New John Lear: UFOs and everything - The Moore Show

[ichingcarpenter]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vq0HxHjId8w

Lear sure believes in everything out there but always interesting in his conjectures.

[Craig]

Great video indeed,

What struck me was the idea of 2 billion people on the moon? How are they fed or looked after?

Would love to see more on what is on his walls

[RunningDeer]

John Lear - UFOs, 9-11, Moon Landing, Cover Ups,
Conspiracies, Disinformation, Mark Richards, & More

SUMMARY

The Moore Show
Published on Sept. 30, 2018

Guest: Whitley John Lear
Website: https://thelivingmoon.com/

John Lear is a retired airline and for the past 25 years John has researched the subject of UFO's and other related conspiracies.

He insists that the United States Apollo missions never went to the moon and that the moon is inhabited with a civilization of more than 500 million humans like us but considerably more advanced who did not come from earth. John's research holds that our solar system has 40 planets not 9 and that all planets and their moons and satellites are inhabited by humans similar to us as well as Extra Terrestrials.

He further he states that mankind was conceived, engineered and built by ET's who secretly control our lives and that mankind is only one strand of an infinite number of strands of life.

John Lear’s opinion on Mark Richards: I’ve never believed Mark Richard story, so convinced me.

snippet @ 1:03:25

Thomas Moore: …but then I could look at a story that Kerry Cassidy covers like Mark Richards. Now Mark Richards is a guy that's in jail and …

John Lear: I’ve never believed Mark Richard story, so convinced me.

Thomas Moore: Well I I've just spent two weeks in San Rafael collecting the information on him. And the I'm making a little documentary on it to show that Mark Richards is not a secret space program whistleblower. He was part of a murder that took place on July 6, 1982 and he's saying that he was framed for that murder by the deep state. But when I spoke to the lead detectives that arrested him in 1982 and charged him that's not true and then when I spoke to his …

John Lear: Excellent Kevin. Excellent work.

Thomas Moore: …and when I when I spoke to his crime partner that had committed the murder for him, he told me that Mark Richards was stood one foot away from him as he committed the murder. So he was on the planet when the murder took place. And I've got all the court transcripts as well of what was said in the courts.

John Lear: You are amazing. Thank you very much for your work.

{snip}

Thomas Moore: ..but when Kerry comes to see you this week, I'm not against Kerry. This is not, you know, yes we've got a disagreement right now but she's free to do what she wants and we're all at different stages …

[conversation continues]

John Lear doesn’t say anything on the Mark Richard topic, no doubt because of his relationship with Kerry. He again states, “Thank you for your work. You are an amazing guy.”

[Deux Corbeaux]

Interesting and sympathetic story teller.
John said that the stories of Corey Goode and David Wilcock were BS...... so HIS stories do have to be true ..... ??

It sure was entertaining.
I like John

[Did You See Them]

One of my favourite Tin Foil Hatters !
Thanks

[Retief]

I've always liked John Lear for some reason and he certainly spins a good yarn. However, one area I can say with certainty he is wrong about is the Colorado. It's a Block III (not Block II as stated) Virginia class SSN. He was correct about the pump jet but that's public knowledge. The d.d (?) hull plating is fiction as is the use of fusion reactors. Although I am no longer involved in the industry I did have the opportunity to tour a Block III boat last year. Anyway, he's an interesting guy, done a lot and no doubt has great contacts. Just take his stories with a grain of salt, not sure what his agenda is.

[Bill Ryan]

I've posted this earlier (quite a long time ago!), but in case it may be useful:

Camelot witness Henry Deacon, who really did know a lot of stuff, told me in 2008 that John Lear's information was about 80% accurate. From what I believe I know, I'd say that's a pretty good assessment.

[Michi]

John Lear also mentions in the above interview that no one would be able to get thru the Van Allen belt unless the ship would have an 5 feet lead armor. (It's about 41:53 in the video).
When looking at various images at the Van Allen belt being torus shaped I wonder why one wouldn't fly thru at the weakest part at around the south pole.

[Did You See Them]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I've posted this earlier (quite a long time ago!), but in case it may be useful:

Camelot witness Henry Deacon, who really did know a lot of stuff, told me in 2008 that John Lear's information was about 80% accurate. From what I believe I know, I'd say that's a pretty good assessment.

But the thing is .. Which 80% ?

[wnlight]

I do not believe that John Lear was correct about the Van Allan belt. So if I am correct, then that statement must be part of the 20% falsehood. :-)

[geofffxdwg]

Its a good interview but its hard for me to watch for two reasons. First and foremost John Lear looks like he is not doing very well these days. Second is, I was supposed to be there helping with this interview. A personal family crisis stopped me from being at this interview and another very important interview a week before this was filmed. John is very entertaining and he is one of a very few individuals in this industry (He helped pioneer with Lazar) that will admit when he was wrong or mislead and change his opinion on something. I have to agree with Bill Ryan on how much of his information is accurate although my estimates are lower than 80%. None the less I always enjoy a John Lear interview as long as whoever interviews him doesn't keep asking him the same old questions. The soul catcher and CIA pilot etc topics have been beaten to death. A two hour interview can get eaten up very fast listening to him repeat what countless others have already asked him in the past.

[thepainterdoug]

I CHING C/ I almost posted this two days ago. I have to say I have always liked John Lear. I like this interview, he's sharing his info his views and beliefs and could care less about convincing anyone . and I believe Bill is right on the 80% ishness


I have to say I do agree with him on this, THERE WILL BE NO DISCLOSURE .

there will be leaks and drips, hints and promises alluding to, but always steeped in deniability . And OBFUSCATION, the main objective.

[conk]

Posted by Did You See Them (here)
One of my favourite Tin Foil Hatters !
Thanks

Me2.

The idea of people living on the moon is strong contrast to the hours of videos I watched yesterday about the moon being an illusion. Find the Crrow777 videos on that subject. He's the guy who popularized the "lunar wave", based on the work of a brilliant Russian scientist.

[Bill Ryan]

Well,

1. The moon's no 'illusion', and
2. No, nobody lives there (apart from probably a whole bunch of ETs in bases on the dark side, and a few dozen Secret Space Program astronauts in small domes on the near side).
   
   

[DNA]

Posted by conk (here)

Posted by Did You See Them (here)
One of my favourite Tin Foil Hatters !
Thanks

Me2.

The idea of people living on the moon is strong contrast to the hours of videos I watched yesterday about the moon being an illusion. Find the Crrow777 videos on that subject. He's the guy who popularized the "lunar wave", based on the work of a brilliant Russian scientist.

I'm a big fan of Crrow777, I don't agree with everything he says, but he is in new territory and he isn't afraid to make some correlations.

I've heard Crow hypothesize that the lunar wave appears to be a relatively new manifestation, he states that in times past our forefathers were capable of making more detailed maps of the moon than our modern telescopes will show us in modern times.

The same goes for Mars.

Crow has an absolutely amazing telescope, one of the best you can buy as an amateur astronomer, it is many times better than what was available three and four hundred years ago, and yet those folks were able to make better and more detailed paintings of the moon that outperformed photographs taken by astronomers of today. Why is this? Crow thinks it has to do with the Lunar Wave.

Crow thinks that the Lunar Wave is a glitch in a huge halographic projection used to cover whatever is really going on in regards to the surface of the moon.

I'm not saying that his speculation is correct I am saying that it is interesting and I appreciate where he is going in his specialized field of expertise.

[Spellbound]

John Lear was the very first Camelot video I ever came across (by accident 10 years back). After that, I fell down the rabbit hole.

Dave - Toronto

[ichingcarpenter]

.I was a time witness to the Bob Lazar story which
blew everything away with the UFO world. I'm that old and went to UFO affairs before the internet

John has an early history on things and I respect his contribution to the field

However having been a statistician in my quest for my masters
I put his growing stories over the years not at 80% true but 20% true.
He gained enormous earned notoriety with his witnessing the area 51 saucer truth with Bob Lazar and with Knapp.

Then his stories started to grow without validation,data or evidence and it showed in his claims and interviews and least to me

Sorry guys........ great story teller..... But show me the beef .

He's been in his basement since the 80s and doesn't go to UFO conferences
Even when Lazar broke the scene and needed his friend's help to say ........ it was real, which I think it was.




I love him, he opens eyes but I'm not giving him a 80% true peg on his stories as some here.