The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[mgray]

A little more background on Anthony Weiner's laptop.

[mountain_jim]

I've been waiting for a long time for the (NYC Police insider) rumored contents of the emails in the 'insurance' folder from this laptop to be made public.

Hopefully they were not lost ("We have it all") and the chess pieces are lining up to get around the stonewallers and expose it all in trials.

[Helene West]

I just read Noelle's post above re Q trip codes to Google books and the book excerpt. Lolllllllll this is getting funny folks. We just need Rod Serling showing up....

[Zanshin]

Two of my biggest passions over the years - music (playing and singing ballads w/ guitar) and martial arts (different forms but big Aikido focus).

Now every time I bust out Hotel California or Desperado I struggle with the debauchery of the music scene and Don's puported penchant for underage girls.

Aikido's big hollywood star Seagal turns out to be a major sex pest.

Now Q is throwing out quotes from Reagan who, if I'm not mistaken, used to get Cathy O'Brien to do tricks for him with his labrador.

Great quotes from Reagan (or whoever wrote his speeches for him).

I'm still partial to the Eagles and Led Zepplin - maybe I'll stick more to the Irish ballads I was reared on (where all their parties were merry and all their songs were sad).

The less said about Seagal the better.

Is this slide into depravity a part of the human condition when given access to unfetered power - I wonder what debasement I could be tempted into in a similar circumstance?

As said access to unfettered power is far from my sphere, I'm just going to hike out to one of the Glasshouse Mountains and pick a challenging route to climb.

When I get to the top I'm going remove my climbing shoes and ground myself on that ancient stone - as far as I can get from the internet and as connected as I can get to mother earth's net.

[Jayke]

Very interesting presentation from Mike Billington of the LaRouche movement. He covers lots of pertinent points regarding some of the bigger picture elements shaping current geopolitics. From Kavanaugh’s confirmation to China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative (to which he works as a consultant to China’s high finance institutions, helping direct the rollout of the new Silk Road projects). Another interesting note about Billington is that he spent 10 years in jail as a political prisoner in the US, because, along with Lyndon LaRouche, they were writing books exposing the British Empires sinister role in directing American Deep State affairs.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WedTnwJzcYo

=============

An article—not related to the video above—but also from the LaRouche website, discussing the implications of the upcoming midterms in November.

• https://larouchepac.com/20181008/ele...way-beyond-now

This Election Will Not Be 2016 Done Over —We're Way Beyond That Now!

Those like Hillary Clinton who have never understood what happened in the 2016 election, naturally expect (and hope) that the 2018 midterms will mark a return to "normal" U.S. elections. They make nonsense predictions like their claim that a statistic—the one that says that on average, Presidents have usually lost in midterm elections—ensures Trump will lose the House of Representatives. But nothing could be more ludicrous than to believe that any statistic from the past could control what Americans do now. It could only influence them if they were stupid enough to believe such an argument. But now, in fact, Americans generally are a lot less stupid than they were two years ago—or even two months ago. That is the real story of this election—although it is one that Hillary Clinton may never be able to understand.

The name for this phenomenon is "the mass strike," as Lyndon LaRouche constructed this argument exactly 50 years ago, basing himself on Percy Bysshe Shelley's unfinished A Defence of Poetry of 1821, and Rosa Luxemburg's The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions of 1906. Great works by two of humanity's greatest leaders of the modern era. LaRouche most frequently cited a section towards the end of Shelley's work, assuming his hearers were familiar with the writing as a whole. Describing historical periods preceding or accompanying "a great and free development of the national will" of England, Shelley wrote, "At such periods there is an accumulation of the power of communicating and receiving intense and impassioned conceptions respecting man and nature."

The spread of this "power" is not precisely voluntary, and is often unnoticed by the recipients. Its immediate causes in one or another case are usually unknown—as is seen both in Shelley's and in Luxemburg's arguments. Indeed it most resembles a perception rather than a thought—but not a perception by the usual organs of sense. Shelley continues from the sentence quoted above, to write "The persons in whom this power resides, may often, as far as regards many portions of their nature, have little apparent correspondence with that spirit of good of which they are the ministers. But even whilst they deny and abjure, they are yet compelled to serve, the power which is seated on the throne of their own soul."

If we can prevent the disaster of a Democratic House of Representatives, which would destroy the country by impeaching the President; if we can shut down Britain's regime-change operation and put conspirators Obama, Mueller, Brennan and others in jail; and if we can use this mass-strike period to win hegemony for LaRouche's "Four New Laws" and New Bretton Woods system—then, under those conditions, the whole world is now entering a new period of deep-going, far-reaching positive reform, comparable to Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, but far broader in its implications. National sovereignty is being brought back from the dead, at the same time that sovereign nations fully engage together to win the "common aims of mankind," as LaRouche's collaborator the late Dr. Edward Teller put it.

What is all this—a forecast of the future? ("Never make predictions, especially about the future," said Casey Stengel.) But its effects are already here today, in what Shelley called "the gigantic shadows which futurity casts upon the present." You can call it the future if you like, but it is already shaping the 2018 elections, as it has been for some time before we noticed it. The "power" Shelley was writing about, we might call intensely awakened individual creativity—which is intrinsically social at the same time that it is individual. It is the only conscious power of negative entropy we know of in the universe. Its effects are seen in the volunteers joining Kesha Rogers' flagship Independent campaign in Texas' 9th Congressional District, but also equally in thousands of other ways which may seem to have nothing to do with each other.

How does it work? Americans (and not only Americans) are experiencing the most diverse kinds of effects, minute-to-minute, of all the indirect ramifications of the fact that the long nightmare which reached the deepest level of Hell under George W. Bush and Obama, may finally be coming to an end. (There are many other valid ways to phrase this as well.) This reflects itself, unawares, in changed personal relationships. In cultural factors and other areas too numerous to name. They are unaware of it, but at the same time they are changed by a perception, as it were, of something "gigantic" of which they are unaware.

A sort of reasoning is going on in their minds which is often implicit, rather than conscious. (Rosa Luxemburg's Mass Strike explores this aspect very fully.) Take, as an example, the effects of the Kavanaugh hearings. What is their meaning for tens of millions of Americans, even if they themselves may not be aware of that meaning? "Think where we'd be now if Hillary had won. What an open sewer!" And where we will be if she claws her way back.

The major "Russiagate" documents which are being declassified by President Trump and Congressional committees will hit over the next few days into this mass-strike process. The mass strike is occurring in the forcing-medium of the oncoming election. What does it mean for the "election per se"? Not only will this not be a "normal" pre-2016 election. It will not be a rerun of 2016 either—we're now in a completely different world from where we were in 2016. Among many other effects, the mass strike means that unique creative interventions will be made, by ourselves and others and ourselves with others, to "turn the adversary's flank," and such interventions will re-echo and inspire all sorts of others, increasingly as Nov. 6 approaches

============

If anyone’s got the means, motive, planning and opportunity to pull off the Q psy-op; the deep state operatives affiliated to the LaRouche movement would be my number 1 contenders. Certainly fills my Hope-O-Meter to anticipate we might actually see some positive changes take shape after the midterms at least.

[Bob]

A very bad day... for some elite swamp critters..

I have been given a verbal warning to "shut up".. stop with the postings.. hmmm

wondering a bit about that, I came across this article - http://preservefreedom.org/we-will-k...d-on-metadata/

The stealthy use of backdoor data collection programs has given many a cause for concern.

In a time where you can be labeled a terrorist for being true to Christian values or called a “hate-monger” because you don’t agree with gay marriage, there are dangerous implications for the collection of metadata.

David Cole said that the collection of metadata eliminates the need for actual content to be presented when life or death decisions are being made.

Here’s what the means: If you say enough of the “right” keywords, or if your activity fits a certain profile, metadata alone can be used to construct a profile that puts you on a “hit list.”

That’s horrifying.

Essentially, if your conversations meet certain criteria, they don’t even need to know what you said, all they have to do is see what you talked about.

Forget innocent until proven guilty… in the future, you could be found guilty (and executed) just because you fit “a guilty profile.”

and

Ever since Edward Snowden pulled back the curtain and let Americans see how the NSA and other clandestine agencies have been secretly collecting metadata from phone calls, emails, and other forms of electronic communication, people have been asking, “For what purpose?”

Now there’s a definitive answer.

Hayden has revealed the collection of metadata can be used for the purpose of executing people when their metadata lines up with a certain, target profile.

As he said:

“[That] description… is absolutely correct. We kill people based on metadata.

But that’s not what we do with this metadata,” said Hayden, apparently referring to domestic metadata collection. “It’s really important to understand the program in its entirety. Not the potentiality of the program, but how the program is actually conducted.”

“What it cannot do are all those things that… allows someone to create your social network, your social interactions, your patterns of behavior. One could make the argument that could be useful, [or] that could be illegal, but it’s not done,” he said. “In this debate, it’s important to distinguish what might be done with what is being done.”

and

At a debate being held at Johns Hopkins University, former CIA and NSA director Michael Hayden revealed the true purpose of the NSA’s dragnet espionage program.

Though Hayden argued that he was only describing the potential use of the program, his remarks were nonetheless callous and chilling when he uncovered the true reason for the agencies underhanded and surreptitious snooping techniques.

The debate can be seen in this video below:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kV2HDM86XgI

obviously I haven't stopped sharing my thoughts..

[RunningDeer]

@17:59 - "We kill people based on metadata."

Posted by Bob (here)
A very bad day... for some elite swamp critters..

I have been given a verbal warning to "shut up".. stop with the postings.. hmmm

wondering a bit about that, I came across this article...

“[That] description… is absolutely correct. We kill people based on metadata.

But that’s not what we do with this metadata,” said Hayden, apparently referring to domestic metadata collection. “It’s really important to understand the program in its entirety. Not the potentiality of the program, but how the program is actually conducted.”

“What it cannot do are all those things that[/INDENT]
obviously I haven't stopped sharing my thoughts..

[Jayke]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
@17:59 - "We kill people based on metadata."

Listening to more of the presentation from that point on, it seems like this strategy could have been used by the NSA to identify John McCain as an ISIS commander, as pointed out by Q in one of their photo drops a while back. 228 people got flagged in the profiling system—according to the speaker in the vid. I wonder how many of those were deep state traitors to the American constitution?

The CIA have been profiling people for decades. Fritz Springmeier had a book ‘how to create an Illuminati mindslave’, where, amidst all the extremely disturbing accounts of the mind manipulation techniques employed by the illuminati in their torture programs, they briefly discuss the importance of John Gittingers Personality Assessment System for profiling potential Manchurian candidates:

Psychologist Dr. John Gittinger (Nov 1, 1917 - Oct 19, 2003) conceived the fundamental idea behind the Personality Assessment System, or PAS, many years ago when he observed that our personalities are shaped, to a large extent, by the way we use the several components of our intellect. He realized that each person learns to cope with life by using (or not using) the intellectual strengths and overcoming (or not overcoming) the intellectual weaknesses that she or he may have learned or acquired by genetic endowement. He saw that, over the period of our maturation into adulthood, this process produces what we call each person's "personality." The result, in other words, for each of us, is a coherent pattern for how to "do" life.

Gittinger's insight evolved into a system by which cognitive behavior, emotional reaction, perceptual style and social interaction can be mapped into twelve scalable dimensions, each representing a component of intellectual function. These dimensions, and the technology for mapping into and out of them, constitute the Personality Assessment System. The system has, as its major strengths, the fact that such mappings permit one to quantify social intelligence, identify the roots of psychological disfunctions, design effective therapies for such disfunctions, tailor educational strategies to fit individual needs, provide guidance to those with personnel problems and make accurate predictions about individual behavior. The PAS is being applied for all these, and other, purposes in a number of settings and institutions in the U.S. and abroad.

The PAS has its roots in Gittinger's early career as a psychologist at Central State Hospital in Norman, OK (1948-1949). It was there that he began to observe behavioral differences among the patients, which could be linked to differential (ipsitive) scores on the sub-tests of standardized psychological test instruments. 1950-1978, Dr. Gittinger’s professional career and the PAS further developed as he rose to the position of Chief Psychologist of World-Wide Operations for the Central Intelligence Agency. During that time he perfected the PAS through the analysis of tens of thousands of cases being evaluated for national security purposes He also served as an advisor to several U.S. presidents about matters of national security. His use of the PAS to analyze and make accurate predictions about the behavior of key world leaders was of critical importance to the decisions made by those presidents.

Even John Marks, in his anti-CIA book In Search of the Manchurian Candidate, recognized and reported that the most positive development during the 1950's and 1960's in the CIA was the Personality Assessment System. Marks goes on (though with characteristic sarcasm) to describe the genius of Dr. Gittinger whose creative thought and psychological acumen resulted in the development of the PAS.

After Dr. Gittinger’s retirement from government service in 1978, many of the psychologists with whom he had worked developed university affiliations. Students at such prestigious institutions as Cornell University, The Ohio State University, The University of Missouri, and American International College are among those who have been provided with an opportunity to learn to analyze and interpret PAS profiles. The Gittinger Assessment Center, established at Hocking College in 1984, served as a site for training, resources, information, and data collection. Today, many original documents from the development and research on the PAS are housed at the Center for the History of Psychology on the campus of the University of Akron.

They’ve had our personalities profiled since the inception of the internet. They started with magazine subscriptions and credit card data no doubt.

[ThePythonicCow]

.

Oct 8, 2018

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#361

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 11:13:39 No.361

>>293
But, of course, Anons already knew POTUS would not be baited to FIRE.
Think Red Line.
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#362

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 11:44:09 No.362

>>306
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem...chment-recusal
But, of course, Anons already knew D's playbook re: KAV.
Think [HERD SHEEP].
Think 2/3rd Senate vote req to impeach [impossible].
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#363

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 12:39:07 No.363

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...arrassment-not
[Why not?] [if true] D's do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?
Why are D's opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?
DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT - why the block?
Define 'Projection'.
See article above - redactions made to 'protect' exposing the REAL TRUTH?
Logical thinking.
McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] 'wear a wire'
Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House
Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]
[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House
Locked & Loaded.
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#364

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 12:49:52 No.364

File (hide): d67e5285d9a29fe⋯.jpg (112.68 KB, 1080x809, 1080:809, GS2819378100.jpg) (h) (u)



https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status...33485742313472
But, of course, Anons already knew this.
Knowledge is power.
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#365

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 12:53:20 No.365

>>357
113,000+ 'suppressed' [new] views in less than 24hrs.
Your voice is spreading.
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#366

Oct 08 2018 14:12:00 Q !!mG7VJxZNCI
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/pegg...avanaugh-fight
#WALKAWAY
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#367

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 13:27:19 No.367

https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-...lic-1539017194
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/t...ta-breach.html
https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/21/tw...r-over-a-year/
Do you believe in coincidences?
Data provided to D party 'affiliate' to [target] voters for Nov 6 election?
Win-at-all-costs?
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#368

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 14:05:15 No.368

File (hide): 089785b63585223⋯.jpg (457.66 KB, 2047x1683, 2047:1683, DpAd_R_W4AEJntk.jpg-large.jpg) (h) (u)

From https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3398186.html#3398484

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 16:45:14 2f96e5 (1) No.3398484
>>3398290 ... [[ Links in turn to this Brietbart article - Paul. ]]
Court order to preserve ALL data sent to GOOG?
Think GOOG+ / Gmail / etc.
Comms Cleanup?
The More You Know…
Q

[ThePythonicCow]

.

Early in the morning of Oct 9, 2018

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#369

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 10/08/18 (Mon) 22:58:37 No.369

[Sally Yates]
Q

[ThePythonicCow]

Some earlier posts in this thread mentioning Sally Yates:

• 12 Feb 2018: Sally Yates met with Obama, Comey, Biden and Susan Rice on 5 Jan 2017 (just before Obama left office) (discussing the anti-Trump activity ??)
• 20 Mar 2018: Sally Yates employee of Senior Executive Service (SES)
• 11 April 2018: Following the firing of AAG Sally Yates, April 2017, Boente was put in charge of the DOJ National Security Division
• 18 April 2018: Eleven House Republicans referred Hillary Clinton, Comey, McCabe, Lynch, Boente, Strzok and Page to FBI for prosecution
• 5 May 2018: Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General & Acting Attorney General - FIRED
• 6 May 2018: Sally Yates testimony to House Intel Committee conflicted with that of Comey, McCabe and McCord
• 17 May 2018: People at very top organizing Trump entrapment: Obama, Lynch, Comey, McCabe, Preet Bhahara, Sally Yates, Brennan, Clapper, Jeh Johnson.
• 7 Sep 2018: Signed off on the redacted FISA application
• 11 Sep 2018: Bruce Ohr [in effort to save Nellie Ohr] testifying against Rosenstein, Yates, Lynch, and Comey?
• 11 Sep 2018: Panic in DC. -- King & Spalding hired [last week] to represent Sally Yates?
• 9 Oct 2018: [Sally Yates]

[arwen]

Since this important issue never came up in the hearings, (Patriot Act, and specifically the 4th Amendment), dropping this here:

SCOTUS Nominee Brett Kavanaugh on the Fourth Amendment and Warrantless Bulk Data Collection

Extract:

Kavanaugh expressed that view in the course of a 2015 statement concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc in Klayman v. Obama, which was then before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The case centered on the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's controversial information-gathering program, which involved the NSA collecting the telephony metadata of all Americans. "In my view," Kavanaugh wrote, "the Government's metadata collection program is entirely consistent with the Fourth Amendment."...

...The future of the Fourth Amendment is one of the most pressing issues facing the Supreme Court. As the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee prepare for Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings in the coming months, I encourage them to devote real attention to his possible shortcomings on the Fourth Amendment front."

And of course, that just somehow never came up. There is no question that in the current political climate, this data collection has proven essential, but it is a matter that needed to be probed and discussed. Far more than his beer drinking habits. Interesting how that happened.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by arwen (here)
And of course, that just somehow never came up. There is no question that in the current political climate, this data collection has proven essential, but it is a matter that needed to be probed and discussed. Far more than his beer drinking habits. Interesting how that happened.

Yeah - portions of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing were not trying to talk law, but rather trying to trash Kavanaugh.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
Some earlier posts in this thread mentioning Sally Yates:

• 7 Sep 2018: Signed off on the redacted FISA application

From https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...085966848.html, I see that Sally Yates signed off on two of the applications to the FISA Court:

[mgray]

Rosenstein appears to have more than nine lives.

[arwen]

Not Q related as such, but will be interesting to see what occurs, and what comes from Q in the light of this:

Chairman Devin Nunes Discusses Rod Rosenstein

Link to full article above.

Extract:

Exposing the FBI/DOJ dirty deeds is a major priority for a contingent within congress and a multitude of Trump supporters. Therefore HPSCI Chairman Devin Nunes and Trump supporters have differing sets of priorities than President Trump...

...As noted , likely the U.K and Australian government are both concerned and embarrassed at the exploitation that took place. Christopher Steele (U.K), Alexander Downer (AU) etc.

The collaborative ‘spy-gate’ operation (crossfire hurricane) between the CIA, FBI and DOJ-NSD is an embarrassment; and globally no-one knows the extent to which the FISA and Five-Eyes process is used, manipulated and abused.

Key point. Trump now has the leverage.

When wondering what President Trump will do with the leverage he now carries, think back to how Donald Trump (apex predator) always holds leverage for maximum impact at specifically chosen (by him) pressure points. Trump carries leverage like currency; he withdraws from positions when he gains leverage. The ability to deploy leverage at a time of his choosing is the power; the position which creates the leverage is not as powerful, and thereby discarded...

...The election is 29 days away from today. There is almost no way the IG report on FISA abuse and “spygate” will be completed prior to the mid-term election...

...The IG process for the FISA report is structural. Once the interviews and investigation is complete the “IG referencer” phase takes several weeks. The referencer could be a person or a group of people depending on the size of the report.

The referencer has the responsibility for going through every statement of fact and providing the citation or footnote for the assertion. The person(s) doing the reference review has/have the most arduous of tasks.

The referencer checks every sentence, every assertion, and ensures only provable facts with citations are part of the report. Every assertion of fact must be cited (or footnoted) to include the investigative material that proves the fact. After the footnotes, citations and all fact assemblies are reconciled a draft report is written. The Draft Report encompasses the findings.

The Draft Report is then sent to the principals to review. The Draft Report review allows the principals to provide input on the facts identified and outlined within the draft. This part of the process takes at least two weeks. Responses from the principals about the facts outlined in the draft report are then reviewed, cleared for addition if appropriate, and included in the final report. Then the final report goes to print."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=CXM_z0lhjK8

[Helene West]

Folks, just wanted to say good-bye.
I really have appreciated this thread and everyone who has posted.
The transition into trump thread was one of the main reasons for checking in for me as it was a wonderful substitute for legacy media but that thread is basically dead now due to turiya's choosing to leave.
Re other threads, There are those who can couch their condescension, arrogance, dishonesty and attacks on certain groups or individuals in a stylistic fashion that passes under the radar and if I respond to it with my more overt style the intervening 'moderating' is more triggered and extreme than the actual message response on my part.
But basically I spend too much time on forums anyhow whether reading or writing and there is a need for my time to be spent elsewhere.

The intrigue of Q continues. From the bottom of my heart I hope and pray we are not being royally and diabolically scammed. I wish you all the very best.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Helene West (here)
But basically I spend too much time on forums anyhow whether reading or writing and there is a need for my time to be spent elsewhere.

I wish you all the very best.

Continued health and discovery and all else on your to-do-list, Helen West.

With heart,
Paula

♡

[Valerie Villars]

Well, Helene, I really liked the way you express yourself. I will miss you very much, as I miss Turiya, Kiwi and Michelle Marie. Sigh.

[mgray]

Helene, be well. You will be missed.