Problems with Mark Richards' SSP testimony to Kerry Cassidy

[kevin Moore]

Posted by Mike (here)
Thanks for taking the time to answer all those questions, Kevin. Appreciate it.

And it was kind of you to apologize to Val.

Looking forward to the next vid.

Well thanks Mike - have a good weekend mate

[PurpleLama]

Look, just because you made this make-nice video doesn't mean I won't be keeping an eye on you!

Psst, you need to start your own thread to post your content (with descriptions, or here we go again!).

[Tintin]

Posted by kevin Moore (here)

Posted by Mike (here)
Thanks for taking the time to answer all those questions, Kevin. Appreciate it.

And it was kind of you to apologize to Val.

Looking forward to the next vid.

Well thanks Mike - have a good weekend mate

I second that Mike.

[onawah]

I am curious as to why:
Kevin thought that JoAnn (presumably JoAnn Richards) is an Avalon member and posted on this thread.
As to why Kevin has decided now that he wants to be friends with Avalon members, when he stated before quite clearly here that he didn't care about making friends.
If he thinks that maybe he owes Bill an apology for jumping to conclusions and attacking Bill before he knew anything about the current state of the relationship between Kerry and Bill?

[kevin Moore]

Onwah I did not no that it wasn't Jo Ann - but now Bill stated it wasn't - so cool, We all want the same thing so its better to work together - full stop. maybe you missed the end of my video when I did say to bill lets start over.

[Debra]

Thank you, Kevin. Your sincere apologies and response by vlog was a great idea.
Best of the weekend to you!
Debra

[Valerie Villars]

Kevin apologized? If he did I would like to acknowledge it.

If you did Kevin, thanks and it's all good but where?

If not, I'm off to find a good documentary to watch.

[PurpleLama]

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
Kevin apologized? If he did I would like to acknowledge it.

If you did Kevin, thanks and it's all good but where?

If not, I'm off to find a good documentary to watch.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3gqxfxtKLzY

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
Kevin apologized? If he did I would like to acknowledge it.

If you did Kevin, thanks and it's all good but where?

If not, I'm off to find a good documentary to watch.

Kevin @ 14:30:

One person that I want to apologize to on Project Avalon is a lady called Villars. Now when we were having a heated debate on there, she said to me as a last line of some of the stuff she was typing. "I won't watch your documentary because you're so combative and ugly. No offense. "

And when she said that to me, I did take offense to it. And I told her to "go **** herself". Now she's come back to me to say, "Look, I don't mean you were ugly. I meant your behavior was."

And if that's what you meant, "I completely apologize. Okay?"

It's not the way I read it, but I will defend myself. I don't you know I think we all should have that ability to say no or you know just to go against someone when things are being said. Which you know it's just combative like that.

But let’s let's just move on from here right? I’m sorry. You've told me what you meant. Let’s just move on. And that goes for a lot of the Avalon members. Let’s just move on.

To Kevin:

Thanks for clearing the air and for the apology to Valerie and to the Avalon members. I agree, let's move on.

[Gemma13]

Kevin

Appreciate the podcast, I get it, as your written expression leaves a lot to be desired.

My thoughts:

. No issue with making a career about wanting to “help” people. Everyone has to make a living so time and product needs to be paid for (unless one is fortunate enough to survive without it).

. No issue with experimenting and “evolving” with various income sources – many people dabble in diverse areas, make mistakes, and move on; behavioural integrity can only then be determined over time.

. Being brutally honest Kevin, you didn’t have the talent to make it in mainstream as a presenter, but of course you know this. Media, like many industries, being highly competitive and cutthroat.

. You chose to start out in the alternative realm because of this and kudos to you as you have had marginal success with your platform because of the grant kick-start. The mainstream/academic arena wasn’t going to continue funding/supporting you though so you have had to carry on yourself. Kudos again for continuing to live your dream of being a media presenter.

. Choosing the alternative, in particular channelling, was a good choice because:

- mainstream doesn’t exclusively control it apart from marginalizing it to the sidelines of its own content

- You could continue with your career and explore your personal interests at the same time whilst making a living ; (being the common theme to everyone re “who are we and what the hell are we doing here”)

- the alternative can be a lucrative niche

- I imagine you are/were also “paid in kind” with free channellings/info, (perhaps accommodation at times) from the multitudes that were happy to be interviewed; smart business

My concerns:

. Anyone can become an on-line media presenter with technology today – happening all the time as we are acutely aware.

. Unfortunately a lot of people have a distorted view that “media presenters” have an intelligence that surpasses their own, when the intelligence to be a “media presenter” only needs a technological skill set combined with personality confidence.

Hence the False Equation:

Confidence = Intelligence ∴ Content = Credible

Content requiring a whole other level of “intelligence” which is tragically often missing in our new culture of pop-up media personalities.

. So Kevin, you say you want to evolve into News Media now and keep telling everyone you are all about the truth and hate those that lie.

. A good researcher will have a plan on how they source information, analyse it and come to conclusions about it; and then, of course, integrity is critical to be factored in.

This is tricky of course with so much “unprovable” material leading conclusions to be based entirely on personal opinion.

My questions:

. Could you detail your research methodology.

. If a conclusion relies on an informed opinion in your future works could you provide a backdrop for why your audience should feel confident in your analysis.

. In many cases establishing “truth” to its closest parameters requires collaboration. Could you identify, at this point, if you would collaborate with anyone and why. As well as identify your "current version" of credible researchers/media personalities - considering obviously that no-one can corner the market on "truth" and its knack for swinging like a pendulum.



I appreciate that in an ocean of on-line individuals skeptics can be kicked to the curb quite easily and not bothered about. But if you are truly genuine about transparency I would imagine you don’t want to just “preach to a niche choir” for the cha-ching, like so many carbon cut-outs flooding the stage.

So I would be grateful for your time and consideration of a response.
Thank you

[Valerie Villars]

It's all good Kevin. My favorite part was where you pronounced my name with an English accent.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Joe (here)
Kevin,

Can you tell us how you acquired the very desirable domain name, channeling.com?

What problems, if you care to share, did you have in acquiring that site?

Anyone can register a domain name for a fee and for a set amount of time as long as it isn’t taken. register.com is one of many place where you can check. Below shows that channeling.com is taken and gives other suggestions which you don't need to use.

You don't acquire a site, you build one or hire someone to build it and/or maintain it. Though, it is possible for someone to sell/buy a website. For a monthly fee, you can set up a website and design it how ever you want or use website templates provided by the company. The monthly cost to run the website depends on the package deal you sign on for, the complexity of your website and the amount of data space, etc.

[kevin Moore]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Posted by Joe (here)
Kevin,

Can you tell us how you acquired the very desirable domain name, channeling.com?

What problems, if you care to share, did you have in acquiring that site?

Anyone can register a domain name for a fee and for a set amount of time as long as it isn’t taken. register.com is one of many place where you can check. Below shows that channeling.com is taken and gives other suggestions which you don't need to use.

You don't acquire a site, you build one or hire someone to build it and/or maintain it. Though, it is possible for someone to sell/buy a website. For a monthly fee, you can set up a website and design it how ever you want or use website templates provided by the company. The monthly cost to run the website depends on the package deal you sign on for, the complexity of your website and the amount of data space, etc.

How I got the top tier domain in channeling as single word domain name - well let me answer that in a future video also ill say now that its costing a lot of money and was a future investment - but sure ill address that in my next video.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
It's all good Kevin. My favorite part was where you pronounced my name with an English accent.

Im gad were starting over - thank you

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Gemma13 (here)
Kevin

Appreciate the podcast, I get it, as your written expression leaves a lot to be desired.

My thoughts:

. No issue with making a career about wanting to “help” people. Everyone has to make a living so time and product needs to be paid for (unless one is fortunate enough to survive without it).

. No issue with experimenting and “evolving” with various income sources – many people dabble in diverse areas, make mistakes, and move on; behavioural integrity can only then be determined over time.

. Being brutally honest Kevin, you didn’t have the talent to make it in mainstream as a presenter, but of course you know this. Media, like many industries, being highly competitive and cutthroat.

. You chose to start out in the alternative realm because of this and kudos to you as you have had marginal success with your platform because of the grant kick-start. The mainstream/academic arena wasn’t going to continue funding/supporting you though so you have had to carry on yourself. Kudos again for continuing to live your dream of being a media presenter.

. Choosing the alternative, in particular channelling, was a good choice because:

- mainstream doesn’t exclusively control it apart from marginalizing it to the sidelines of its own content

- You could continue with your career and explore your personal interests at the same time whilst making a living ; (being the common theme to everyone re “who are we and what the hell are we doing here”)

- the alternative can be a lucrative niche

- I imagine you are/were also “paid in kind” with free channellings/info, (perhaps accommodation at times) from the multitudes that were happy to be interviewed; smart business

My concerns:

. Anyone can become an on-line media presenter with technology today – happening all the time as we are acutely aware.

. Unfortunately a lot of people have a distorted view that “media presenters” have an intelligence that surpasses their own, when the intelligence to be a “media presenter” only needs a technological skill set combined with personality confidence.

Hence the False Equation:

Confidence = Intelligence ∴ Content = Credible

Content requiring a whole other level of “intelligence” which is tragically often missing in our new culture of pop-up media personalities.

. So Kevin, you say you want to evolve into News Media now and keep telling everyone you are all about the truth and hate those that lie.

. A good researcher will have a plan on how they source information, analyse it and come to conclusions about it; and then, of course, integrity is critical to be factored in.

This is tricky of course with so much “unprovable” material leading conclusions to be based entirely on personal opinion.

My questions:

. Could you detail your research methodology.

. If a conclusion relies on an informed opinion in your future works could you provide a backdrop for why your audience should feel confident in your analysis.

. In many cases establishing “truth” to its closest parameters requires collaboration. Could you identify, at this point, if you would collaborate with anyone and why. As well as identify your "current version" of credible researchers/media personalities - considering obviously that no-one can corner the market on "truth" and its knack for swinging like a pendulum.



I appreciate that in an ocean of on-line individuals skeptics can be kicked to the curb quite easily and not bothered about. But if you are truly genuine about transparency I would imagine you don’t want to just “preach to a niche choir” for the cha-ching, like so many carbon cut-outs flooding the stage.

So I would be grateful for your time and consideration of a response.
Thank you

wow ok sure let me come back to you as im just pushed for time but I will come back to this

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Joe (here)
Running Deer,

There’s a story involved if Kevin cares to share it. When I asked about what problems did he have to “acquiring the site” I meant, “acquiring the domain name”.

Web domain names, their acquisition, and buying/selling are a big business. I’m just an average Joe. There’s no way I could afford to buy a domain name like that.


https://www.godaddy.com/garage/5-tri...es-for-profit/

Buying and selling domain names is an exciting adventure that for some seems to conjure up images of finding hidden pirate treasure or guessing the winning combination on the next Powerball. Stories abound of domains that were purchased for $8 dollars 15 years ago being sold today for millions. Of course, that leads the more adventurous of us to wonder, “How can I do that?”

Joe, it’s been awhile since I’ve purchased domain names. IIRC it was around $25-$35 per year. The overall average is less for longer commitments such as 3-5 years.

There was a time and maybe there still is where those with the foresight purchased domain names that would be valuable in the future. One example is the purchase of movie stars names in hopes that the stars would pay big money to gain the rights to the domain.

How to Reserve a Domain Name. Do You Need a Web Host if
You Want to Reserve a Domain for Future Use?

One of thesitewizard.com's visitors recently told me that she had an idea for a website that she planned to make in the future, and asked if she needed a web host if all she wanted to do was to reserve a domain name. This article addresses that question.

The Short Answer

The short answer to the question is "no". That is, if all you want is to reserve a domain name, you can easily do it by simply registering that domain. You do not need a web host or website or anything like that to get that name.

How to Reserve a Domain Name (The Detailed Answer)

A website is a separate thing from a domain name. As I explained in my article on How to Create a Website, a domain name is just a name. When you register a domain, you merely get the right to associate it with your website. In the brick and mortar world, a domain name is like the business name that you register with some government organisation ("organization" in US English), while a website is analogous with your shop or office premises. Just as you can register a business name without renting premises in some building for your shop, so also can you register a domain without "renting" space on a web host for your website files.

It's a Common Practice

Reserving domain names is actually a more common practice than you may think. Many experienced webmasters do it automatically long before they start a website. Most even register multiple variations of a name for a single idea, since at that early stage in the planning process, it's hard to be sure which name they might finally settle on. And as everyone knows, domain names sell like hot cakes, so a name they think of today might not be available tomorrow.

{complete article}

[geofffxdwg]

Posted by Joe (here)

Posted by kevin Moore (here)
Onwah I did not no that it wasn't Jo Ann - but now Bill stated it wasn't - so cool, We all want the same thing so its better to work together - full stop. maybe you missed the end of my video when I did say to bill lets start over.

To be clear, you deflected Onawahs question of why you thought I was JoAnn?

I suspect you made the outlandish claim to try and distract attention from my post about your channeling website - you must have realized that it doesn’t portray your motivations in the best light and you were embarrassed despite your protestations.

You accuse Kerry of misleading and promoting frauds on the one hand, and on the other you promote the work of equally destructive and psycopathic personalities like Corey Goode and Emery Smith.

With your channeling website you are selling (eventually- as you clarified that the site is not operational yet) channelers to a group of emotionally vulnerable New Agers. There is nothing illegal or wrong about what you want to do, but it does call in to question your priorities and motivations.

And it also displays a contradiction in your evaluation of Kerry compared to what you do yourself. Are you so irrationally angry at Kerry because you are projecting?

You also say you are angry at Kerry because she had you investigated by a private detective. Do you understand that she did that only after being Facebook stalked/harassed by your partner Geoff for 6 weeks, who also acted emotionally unstable on this website as well?

If I were Kerry (ahem- which I am not) I may have done the same thing if I had the means to do so.


Kevin, I am not against you. I think Kerry deserves the criticism you have with her. To be sure, it’s a serious character flaw she has and it’s not fair to people seeking truth.

What I am asking you to do is to tell the truth about Kerry without carrying out a personal vendetta against her, as you have been advised on this site many many times. As long as the truth comes out I will be your best friend.

You offered an olive branch and to start over on your video. I totally accept, let’s take a fresh start and you can promote your doc and answer questions about your projects here which is beneficial to everyone.

Do you have nothing better to do but continue to insult both Kevin and I with such petty insults? You talk about fresh starts and continue acting like a child. I'm not here to argue with you or answer questions that have nothing to do with our documentary. Tale a recess.

[kevin Moore]

Posted by geofffxdwg (here)

Posted by Joe (here)

Posted by kevin Moore (here)
Onwah I did not no that it wasn't Jo Ann - but now Bill stated it wasn't - so cool, We all want the same thing so its better to work together - full stop. maybe you missed the end of my video when I did say to bill lets start over.

To be clear, you deflected Onawahs question of why you thought I was JoAnn?

I suspect you made the outlandish claim to try and distract attention from my post about your channeling website - you must have realized that it doesn’t portray your motivations in the best light and you were embarrassed despite your protestations.

You accuse Kerry of misleading and promoting frauds on the one hand, and on the other you promote the work of equally destructive and psycopathic personalities like Corey Goode and Emery Smith.

With your channeling website you are selling (eventually- as you clarified that the site is not operational yet) channelers to a group of emotionally vulnerable New Agers. There is nothing illegal or wrong about what you want to do, but it does call in to question your priorities and motivations.

And it also displays a contradiction in your evaluation of Kerry compared to what you do yourself. Are you so irrationally angry at Kerry because you are projecting?

You also say you are angry at Kerry because she had you investigated by a private detective. Do you understand that she did that only after being Facebook stalked/harassed by your partner Geoff for 6 weeks, who also acted emotionally unstable on this website as well?

If I were Kerry (ahem- which I am not) I may have done the same thing if I had the means to do so.


Kevin, I am not against you. I think Kerry deserves the criticism you have with her. To be sure, it’s a serious character flaw she has and it’s not fair to people seeking truth.

What I am asking you to do is to tell the truth about Kerry without carrying out a personal vendetta against her, as you have been advised on this site many many times. As long as the truth comes out I will be your best friend.

You offered an olive branch and to start over on your video. I totally accept, let’s take a fresh start and you can promote your doc and answer questions about your projects here which is beneficial to everyone.

Do you have nothing better to do but continue to insult both Kevin and I with such petty insults? You talk about fresh starts and continue acting like a child. I'm not here to argue with you or answer questions that have nothing to do with our documentary. Tale a recess.

dont worry geoff I dont mind answering any questions people have here - yes its not to do with the Doc but if they want to know more about the person behind the doc no problem.....

[onawah]

Geoff, I took a look at your profile page and I see you have been a member here since 2012, though not very active until lately.
I came across this post from you: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post540665
...where you described Alex Jones in a way that I totally resonate with, re his excitable style of "winding people up". Can you step out of your own shoes for a minute and see how some of us here may have been feeling that your and Kevin's posts here have been creating a similar effect, and why?
Alex shares a lot of good info, and I think that is why his objectionable way of communicating hasn't caused his demise as a presence in the alternative community.
No one here has had any objections to the information you both have shared about Mark Richards, but I would say that your careless and out of control emotional way of expressing yourselves have us concerned.
We like our forum a lot, and we don't want it trashed, or the vibe brought down.
We also want to keep on exposing hoaxes, and so we have been willing to work with you, but you don't seem to be coming across as very sincere in wanting to work with us.
If you don't have time to do a better job of answering reasonable questions, and the only time you have for is to come here and fight, then I think it would be better to find another venue.

Posted by geofffxdwg (here)

Posted by Joe (here)

Posted by kevin Moore (here)
Onwah I did not no that it wasn't Jo Ann - but now Bill stated it wasn't - so cool, We all want the same thing so its better to work together - full stop. maybe you missed the end of my video when I did say to bill lets start over.

To be clear, you deflected Onawahs question of why you thought I was JoAnn?

I suspect you made the outlandish claim to try and distract attention from my post about your channeling website - you must have realized that it doesn’t portray your motivations in the best light and you were embarrassed despite your protestations.

You accuse Kerry of misleading and promoting frauds on the one hand, and on the other you promote the work of equally destructive and psycopathic personalities like Corey Goode and Emery Smith.

With your channeling website you are selling (eventually- as you clarified that the site is not operational yet) channelers to a group of emotionally vulnerable New Agers. There is nothing illegal or wrong about what you want to do, but it does call in to question your priorities and motivations.

And it also displays a contradiction in your evaluation of Kerry compared to what you do yourself. Are you so irrationally angry at Kerry because you are projecting?

You also say you are angry at Kerry because she had you investigated by a private detective. Do you understand that she did that only after being Facebook stalked/harassed by your partner Geoff for 6 weeks, who also acted emotionally unstable on this website as well?

If I were Kerry (ahem- which I am not) I may have done the same thing if I had the means to do so.


Kevin, I am not against you. I think Kerry deserves the criticism you have with her. To be sure, it’s a serious character flaw she has and it’s not fair to people seeking truth.

What I am asking you to do is to tell the truth about Kerry without carrying out a personal vendetta against her, as you have been advised on this site many many times. As long as the truth comes out I will be your best friend.

You offered an olive branch and to start over on your video. I totally accept, let’s take a fresh start and you can promote your doc and answer questions about your projects here which is beneficial to everyone.

Do you have nothing better to do but continue to insult both Kevin and I with such petty insults? You talk about fresh starts and continue acting like a child. I'm not here to argue with you or answer questions that have nothing to do with our documentary. Tale a recess.

[kevin Moore]

Posted by Joe (here)

Posted by geofffxdwg (here)

Posted by Joe (here)

Posted by kevin Moore (here)
Onwah I did not no that it wasn't Jo Ann - but now Bill stated it wasn't - so cool, We all want the same thing so its better to work together - full stop. maybe you missed the end of my video when I did say to bill lets start over.

To be clear, you deflected Onawahs question of why you thought I was JoAnn?

I suspect you made the outlandish claim to try and distract attention from my post about your channeling website - you must have realized that it doesn’t portray your motivations in the best light and you were embarrassed despite your protestations.

You accuse Kerry of misleading and promoting frauds on the one hand, and on the other you promote the work of equally destructive and psycopathic personalities like Corey Goode and Emery Smith.

With your channeling website you are selling (eventually- as you clarified that the site is not operational yet) channelers to a group of emotionally vulnerable New Agers. There is nothing illegal or wrong about what you want to do, but it does call in to question your priorities and motivations.

And it also displays a contradiction in your evaluation of Kerry compared to what you do yourself. Are you so irrationally angry at Kerry because you are projecting?

You also say you are angry at Kerry because she had you investigated by a private detective. Do you understand that she did that only after being Facebook stalked/harassed by your partner Geoff for 6 weeks, who also acted emotionally unstable on this website as well?

If I were Kerry (ahem- which I am not) I may have done the same thing if I had the means to do so.


Kevin, I am not against you. I think Kerry deserves the criticism you have with her. To be sure, it’s a serious character flaw she has and it’s not fair to people seeking truth.

What I am asking you to do is to tell the truth about Kerry without carrying out a personal vendetta against her, as you have been advised on this site many many times. As long as the truth comes out I will be your best friend.

You offered an olive branch and to start over on your video. I totally accept, let’s take a fresh start and you can promote your doc and answer questions about your projects here which is beneficial to everyone.

Do you have nothing better to do but continue to insult both Kevin and I with such petty insults? You talk about fresh starts and continue acting like a child. I'm not here to argue with you or answer questions that have nothing to do with our documentary. Tale a recess.

Geoff,

Kindly point out where the insults are that you say are directed at you and Kevin?

If you have an issue, please report it to the moderators who have a strict policy against insults on this forum.

Posted by Joe
I suspect you made the outlandish claim to try and distract attention from my post about your channeling website - you must have realized that it doesn’t portray your motivations in the best light and you were embarrassed despite your protestations.

------ I have no idea what you are talking about here clueless .com

Posted by Joe
You accuse Kerry of misleading and promoting frauds on the one hand, and on the other you promote the work of equally destructive and psycopathic personalities like Corey Goode and Emery Smith.

--- it was done in June of 2018 way before I went in the direction I have..

Posted by Joe
With your channeling website you are selling (eventually- as you clarified that the site is not operational yet) channelers to a group of emotionally vulnerable New Agers. There is nothing illegal or wrong about what you want to do, but it does call in to question your priorities and motivations.

- ------ Why does this call into question my priorities and motivations - dude im doing a channelling documentary - I cover shows like Coast To Coast does - what are talking about I do a paranormal talk show - Why would I not want to help people with giving people readings and other services and helping myself as well - I believe i'm a soul having a human experience - if you don't then the services I do will make you feel that way about me...full stop. I LOVE PSYCHICS AND CHANNELERS I ALWAYS HAVE - BUT IF I DISCOVERED ONE WAS A FRAUD I WOULD SAY SO ..

Posted by Joe
And it also displays a contradiction in your evaluation of Kerry compared to what you do yourself. Are you so irrationally angry at Kerry because you are projecting?

- - how do I compare to kerry THINK joe Just THINK I DON'T PROMOTE FEAR PORN NOR DO I HAVE A TOP WHISTLE BLOWER CALLED MARK RICHARDS

Posted by Joe
You also say you are angry at Kerry because she had you investigated by a private detective. Do you understand that she did that only after being Facebook stalked/harassed by your partner Geoff for 6 weeks, who also acted emotionally unstable on this website as well?

----- what evidence do you have that Geoff stalked her online for six weeks - come back to reality thats FAKE NEWS.... also if thats what you would do is put a private investigator onto me I really question you as a person Joe... As I would have never had done that - but her higher self did do me a favour.

Posted by Joe
If I were Kerry (ahem- which I am not) I may have done the same thing if I had the means to do so.

Kevin, I am not against you. I think Kerry deserves the criticism you have with her. To be sure, it’s a serious character flaw she has and it’s not fair to people seeking truth.

What I am asking you to do is to tell the truth about Kerry without carrying out a personal vendetta against her, as you have been advised on this site many many times. As long as the truth comes out I will be your best friend.

- I have only ever wanted the truth in my community and thats what I will be doing in my documentaries- showing the darkness of some of these researchers/Host and whistle blowers who are not helping anyone with there bull**** mental instability and damaging peoples awakening.

Posted by Joe
You offered an olive branch and to start over on your video. I totally accept, let’s take a fresh start and you can promote your doc and answer questions about your projects here which is beneficial to everyone.

[Flash]

A domain name at Godaddy is literally 9$ for one year, if you can ever find a name that suits you, hundred of thousands have been bought by companies to be resold at heavy prices.

Lets give a chance to Kevin, he came back to his senses lately, and Geof, please, do the same.

No more paranoia among long standing members.

(English grammar: why did I ever think that among was written amongst? OK found the answer "Among is the earlier word of this pair: according to the Oxford English Dictionary, it first appeared in Old English. ... With regard to their meanings, there’s no difference between among and amongst. ... You can find out more about among and amongst on the Oxford Dictionaries blog,"
In brief: I am old lolll. How many of you guys check in the dictionary on a regular basis to read or write on avalon????)

[kevin Moore]

Posted by Flash (here)
A domain name at Godaddy is literally 9$ for one year, if you can ever find a name that suits you, hundred of thousands have been bought by companies to be resold at heavy prices.

Lets give a chance to Kevin, he came back to his senses lately, and Geof, please, do the same.

No more paranoia among long standing members.

(English grammar: why did I ever think that among was written amongst? OK found the answer "Among is the earlier word of this pair: according to the Oxford English Dictionary, it first appeared in Old English. ... With regard to their meanings, there’s no difference between among and amongst. ... You can find out more about among and amongst on the Oxford Dictionaries blog,"
In brief: I am old lolll. How many of you guys check in the dictionary on a regular basis to read or write on avalon????)

agreed lets just all move forward