Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

[James Newell]

A few more are waking up to this. Supposedly 45 million watched her Netflix movie.

Sandra Bullock’s Bird Box Is About 5G Radiation & Mass Suicide.

https://www.infowars.com/sandra-bullock-admits-bir...

#5G #Radiation #MassSuicide #BirdBox #MassConditioning

[onawah]

UN Secretary General Confesses Ignorance on Known 5G Dangers
GreenMedInfo.com
Published on Jan 4, 2019
"The first eight months of WWII with no fighting was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind. 237 scientists from 43 countries consider 5G a threat to health, yet the UN's Secretary General jokes about his ignorance on 5G, despite WHO reports going back almost two decades stating their harms. Read the article:"

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9bardNO_Ryk

From: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/un-...-war-humanity:
by Claire Edwards, 3 January 2019

"The first eight months of WWII with no fighting was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind.

This phoney war is also silent, but this time shots are being fired – in the form of laser-like beams of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from banks of thousands of tiny antennas[1] – and almost no one in the firing line knows that they are being silently, seriously and irreparably injured.

In the first instance, 5G is likely to make people electro-hypersensitive (EHS).[2] Perhaps it was sitting in front of two big computer screens for many of the 18 years I worked at the UN that made me EHS. When the UN Office at Vienna installed powerful WiFi and cellphone access points – designed to serve large, public areas – in narrow, metal-walled corridors throughout the Vienna International Centre in December 2015, I was ill continuously for seven months.

I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres [transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails.

As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMR published over the last 80 years.[3]

Having spent years editing UN documents dealing with space, I know that outer space is hotly contested geopolitically and any untoward event involving a military satellite risks triggering a catastrophic response.[4] Space law is so inadequate – just one example is the complexity of space liability law[5],[6] – that we could really call the Earth orbits a new Wild West. China caused international consternation in 2007 when it demonstrated an anti-satellite weapon by destroying its own satellite. Space debris is the main concern among space-faring nations, with a so-called Kessler syndrome positing a cascade of space debris that could make the Earth orbits unusable for a thousand years.[7] Does launching 20,000+ commercial 5G satellites in such circumstances sound rational to you?

I live in Vienna, Austria, where the 5G rollout is suddenly upon us. Within the last five weeks, pre-5G has been officially announced at Vienna airport and 5G at the Rathausplatz, the main square in Vienna, which attracts tens of thousands of visitors to its Christmas market each December and skating rink each January, which are special treats for children. Along with birds and insects, children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies.[8]

Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR poisoning:[9] nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs. Other biological effects such as tumours and dementia usually take longer to manifest, but in the case of 5G, which has never been tested for health or safety, who knows?[10]

Seemingly overnight a forest of 5G infrastructure has sprouted in Austria. In the space of three weeks one friend has gone from robust health to fleeing this country, where she has lived for 30 years. Each person experiences EMR differently. For her, it was extreme torture so she and I spent her last two nights in Austria sleeping in the woods. Interestingly, as she drove across southern Germany, she suffered torture even worse than in Austria, while in northern Germany she had no symptoms at all and felt completely normal, which suggests that there has been as yet no 5G rollout there.

There are no legal limits on exposure to EMR. Conveniently for the telecommunications industry, there are only non-legally enforceable guidelines such as those produced by the grandly named International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which turns out to be like the Wizard of Oz, just a tiny little NGO in Germany that appoints its own members, none of whom is a medical doctor or environmental expert.[11]

Like the Wizard of Oz, ICNIRP seems to have magical powers. Its prestidigitation makes non-thermal (non-heating) effects of EMR exposure disappear into thin air, for taking into account the tens of thousands of research studies demonstrating the biological effects of EMR would invalidate its so-called safety guidelines.[12] It has bewitched the International Telecommunication Union, part of the UN family, into recognizing these guidelines.[13] And one little email sent to ICNIRP in October 2018 to submit Professor Martin Pall’s comments on ICNIRP’s new draft guidelines conjured up an immediate explosion of interest in the sender’s online presence – which had hitherto attracted none – from companies and individuals worldwide, one country’s immigration authorities, the office of the Austrian Chancellor (head of government), a firm of lawyers in Vienna and even Interpol![14],[15]

I hope that people read and share our Stop 5G Space Appeal to wake up themselves and others quickly and use it to take action themselves to stop 5G. Even eight short months of this 5G Phoney War could spell catastrophe for all life on Earth. Elon Musk is set to launch the first 4,425 5G satellites in June 2019 and “blanket” the Earth with 5G, in breach of countless international treaties. This could initiate the last great extinction, courtesy of the multi-trillion-US-dollar 5G, the biggest biological experiment and most heinous manifestation of hubris and greed in human history.10

People’s first reaction to the idea that 5G may be an existential threat to all life on Earth is usually disbelief and/or cognitive dissonance. Once they examine the facts, however, their second reaction is often terror. We need to transcend this in order to see 5G as an opportunity to empower ourselves, take responsibility and take action. We may have already lost 80 per cent of our insects to EMR in the last 20 years.[16] Our trees risk being cut down by the millions in order to ensure continuous 5G signalling for self-driving cars, buses and trains.[17] Are we going to stand by and see ourselves and our children irradiated, our food systems decimated, our natural surroundings destroyed?

Our newspapers are now casually popularizing the meme that human extinction would be a good thing,[18],[19] but when the question becomes not rhetorical but real, when it’s your life, your child, your community, your environment that is under immediate threat, can you really subscribe to such a suggestion? If you don’t, please sign the Stop 5G Appeal and get active in contacting everyone you can think of who has the power to stop 5G, especially Elon Musk[20] and the CEOs of all the other companies planning to launch 5G satellites, starting in just 20 weeks from now. Life on Earth needs your help now.



The transcript of my exchange with the UN Secretary-General of 14 May 2018 follows.

[Start of transcript]

Staff member: Mr. Secretary-General

UN staff have repeatedly been told that they are the most important resource of this Organization.

Since December 2015, the staff here at the Vienna International Centre have been exposed to off-the-scale electromagnetic radiation from WiFi and mobile phone boosters installed on very low ceilings throughout the buildings. Current public exposure levels are at least one quintillion times (that’s 18 zeros) above natural background radiation according to Professor Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.

The highly dangerous biological effects of EMFs have been documented by thousands of studies since 1932 indicating that we may be facing a global health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than those caused by tobacco and asbestos.

Mr. Secretary-General, on the basis of the Precautionary Principle, I urge you to have these EMF-emitting devices removed immediately and to call a halt to any rollout of 5G at UN duty stations, because it is designed to deliver concentrated and focused electromagnetic radiation in excess of 100 times current levels in the same way as do directed energy weapons.

In line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to “Protect, Respect and Remedy", 5G technologies MUST be subjected to an independent health and safety assessment before they are launched anywhere in the world.

There is currently an international appeal (https://www.emfscientist.org/index. php/emf-scientist-appeal) signed by 237 EMF scientists from 41 nations urging the UN and particularly the WHO to exert strong leadership in fostering the development of more protective EMF guidelines, encouraging precautionary measures, and educating the public about health risks, particularly risk to children and fetal development.

Mr. Secretary-General, we have a unique opportunity here at the UN Office at Vienna. Since our medical records are digitized, you have the possibility of releasing data on a closed population exposed to off-the-scale levels of electromagnetic radiation to establish if there have already been abnormal health consequences for the UN staff here in the last 28 months.

I urge you to do so and stop any 5G rollout in these buildings immediately.

Thank you.

UN Secretary-General: Sorry, because you are talking to someone who is a little bit ignorant on these things. You’re talking about the WiFi systems?

Staff member: On the ceilings of these buildings, WiFi boosters and cell phone boosters were installed without consultation, without information to staff in December 2015. Now, if you understand electromagnetic radiation, the signal is - if you cannot get a signal from your mobile phone, the signal goes to maximum strength and that then bounces off metal walls affecting the body multiple times at maximum exposure levels. So the situation here is extremely dangerous. I have heard anecdotally of many people who have had health problems. I don’t know if they are related but the Precautionary Principle would dictate that we use our medical records to look into this and that we remove these dangerous devices immediately. Thank you.

UN Secretary-General: Well, I’m worried because I put those devices in my house. [Laughter & applause]

Staff member: Not a good idea!

UN Secretary-General: This I will have to – I confess my ignorance on this but I’m going to raise this with WHO [World Health Organization] – which I think is the organization that might be able to deal with it properly for them to put someone - their staff or organizations to work on that because I must confess I was not aware of that danger – [humorously] to the extent that I put those things in the rooms of my house – in the ceiling.

Staff member: I would suggest that everybody start looking into this issue and particularly into 5G, which 237 scientists from 41 countries consider a threat that is far worse than the tobacco and asbestos threats of the past.

UN Secretary-General: Well, maybe I have learned something completely new. I hope it will be very useful to me but I confess it is the first time I hear about it.

[End of transcript]

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the authors of the Stop 5G Appeal.

Claire Edwards, BA Hons, MA, worked for the United Nations as Editor and Trainer in Intercultural Writing from 1999 to 2017. Since May 2018, she has collaborated with Arthur Firstenberg to publish the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (www.5gspaceappeal.org). The Appeal has attracted over 30,000 individual and group signatories from 100 countries, but still needs to reach many more people."

Comment from the youtube page: "...duping delight smile. He is lying! Guterres is from my country, he is an ignorant puppet, perfect for deception speech at UN. He is one of the puppets of the cabal. He was selected for secretary general at UN because Portugal is involved in the development of 5G techcnology and the internet 2, the internet of things, he is lying! He is a criminal!

[onawah]

20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth
January 8, 2019
http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/200...-entire-earth/
by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News

"Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.

In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.

As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.

The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1]

The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1]

5G will use Phased Array Antennas to shoot Beams of Radiation at Cell Phones
These satellites will use the same type of phased array antennas as will be used by the ground-based 5G systems.

This means that they will send tightly focused beams of intense microwave radiation at each specific 5G device that is on the Earth and each device will send a beam of radiation back to the satellite. [2]

Previous generations of RF cellular communication used large antennas to send a blanket of radiation in all directions. The lower frequencies they used and the broad distribution of microwaves limited the numbers of cellular devices that could connect through an individual tall tower.

The much shorter length microwaves used for 5G will make it possible to use small phased array antennas to send and receive signals.

Phased array antennas consist of clusters of hundreds of tiny antennas that work together to shoot a ray of energy at a target just like a bullet. A cluster of these tiny antennas can be arranged in a 4 inch by 4 inch matrix.

The rays of microwaves they produce will be strong enough to pass through walls and human bodies. If they were not strong enough to do this, then everyone with a 5G smartphone would have to stand outside when using the devices. [2]

Each 5G product will also have multiple phased array antennas which will be used to create a powerful beam of radiation back to the 5G devices mounted on electrical utility poles or toward a specific satellite in space.

These beams of radiation will also need to be strong enough to pass through walls and human flesh such as a hand or head to reach the intended destination. [2]

This means that if you are in a crowded location, such as an airport or on a train, there will be hundreds if not thousands of invisible beams of radiation flying through the environment at the speed of light.

As people move in that environment, their bodies will be penetrated by numerous beams of radiation as they walk or as other people walk around them with their 5G smartphones. [2]

5G Phones will be much more Powerful than Previous Phones
The effective radiated power of the 5G phased array antennas in phones will be 10 times more powerful than 4G phones.

No one will be free from exposure.

In addition, 5G beams of microwave radiation will be received and transmitted from new computer equipment, household appliances, and automobiles.

Stationary equipment such as Wi-Fi hubs in homes and offices will be permitted to use microwave beams that are 15 times stronger (300 watts) than the signals from 5G phones or 150 times stronger than 4G phones. [2]

Why is 5G so Much More Dangerous than Previous Microwave Communication Systems?
Arthur Firstenberg, author, researcher, and advocate for limiting RF exposure from the environment, explains the analysis of 5G radiation that was published in Microwave News in 2002. He stated:

When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow.

But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body [5G], something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body.

These re-radiated waves are called Brillouin precursors.

They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough.

5G will probably satisfy both requirements. This means that the reassurance we are being given—that these millimeter waves are too short to penetrate far into the body—is not true. [2]

5G Satellites Will Fill the Skies
These are the companies with the biggest plans to deploy satellites:

SpaceX: 12,000 satellites
OneWeb: 4,560 satellites
Boeing: 2,956 satellites
Spire Global: 972 satellites
Arthur Firstenberg describes the plans of corporations who want to use 5G technology. He states:

Honeywell has already signed a memorandum of understanding to become OneWeb’s first large customer—it plans to provide high-speed Wi-Fi on business, commercial, and military aircraft throughout the world.

SpaceX would like to provide the equivalent of 5G to every person on the planet. [3]

Ground-based 5G Implementation
Ground-based 5G systems are already being implemented in dozens of major cities right now. Plans are being approved by hundreds of other cities, which will allow implementation in 2019 and beyond.

As I explained in my previous articles, cities do not have the right to “say no” to 5G. FCC regulations prevent cities from objecting on the basis of health concerns – they only can speak to issues of esthetics and the practical matter of the placement of equipment.

They are required to “say yes,” and they better do it quickly, or telecom companies will threaten them with legal action for obstructing their plans.

Satellite Based 5G Implementation
The first two 5G test satellites were launched by SpaceX in February of 2018. Hundreds of other satellites are expected to be launched in 2019. The full set of 20,000 satellites could be put in orbit during the next two years.

To put this into perspective, as of September 2017 there were 1,738 operating satellites into orbit around the Earth. This means the number of satellites will be 11 times greater than the current number. [4]

Environmental Catastrophe from Rockets used to Launch Satellites
Rocket fuel is very destructive to the Earth’s ozone layer which protects us from the harsh effects of radiation from the sun. In 2017, there were 90 rocket launch attempts worldwide. [5]

The rockets that use solid fuel produce massive ozone depletion. While rockets using liquid kerosene as fuel destroy less ozone, they release massive amounts of black carbon soot into the air, especially at high altitudes.

If the number of annual rocket launches increases by 10 or more times, which is likely under the plans these corporations have made, computer models suggest that the combination of ozone depletion and release of black soot could produce a 3 degree warming effect over the Antarctic and reduce the ozone in the world’s atmosphere by 4%. [3]

Even though it will be possible for a single rocket to put multiple satellites into orbit, we are still talking about a 10 or 20 fold increase in environmental damage over what is being produced today. [3]

The 5G satellites have a relatively short lifespan, perhaps only 5 years, which means there will be high numbers of rocket launches, not just in the next few years, but in every year for the foreseeable future. [3]

Mercury-based Rocket Fuel Could Spread Neurotoxins Over the Earth
As bad as liquid and solid rocket fuels will be for the environment, Apollo Fusion is developing a mercury-based propulsion system for launching rockets.

These ion propulsion rocket engines use powerful magnets to push away small charged particles at high speeds, which generates thrust. NASA experimented with mercury ion propulsion in the 1960s, but abandoned the research.

Mercury is an extremely strong neurotoxin, which is harmful to all forms of life, especially humans.

The risks of an environmental catastrophe are monumental, because if there was a malfunction and one of these engines exploded, highly toxic mercury would be spread through the atmosphere and over the Earth. [6]

All the talk from telecom companies about 5G being a panacea for environmental protection and energy conservation is quite ridiculous when we think about the environmental damage that will be created by any of the rocket engines they choose to use for launching their satellites.

Space Junk will Pollute the Earth
Each satellite will be the size of a small refrigerator and will weigh approximately 880 pounds. [4]

With a life expectancy of only 5-years [3], this means there will be a massive amount of space junk orbiting the Earth.

Eventually, all those satellites will fall down to Earth and will burn up as they enter the Earth’s atmosphere.

All the hazardous materials in the satellites will be released into the air and will float down to the ground as dust or in droplets of rain.

Telecom Companies are Creating a Worldwide Disaster in the Name of Technological Progress
5G is promoted as being the next great wonder in the plan to advance technology to create smart cities where everything and everyone is instantly connected in real time with no lags or lost signals.

Of course there will be a few costs.

Everyone will be irradiated with millimeter-size, non-ionizing radiation 24 hours a day with completely unknown health effects.

Studies designed to investigate harm from 5G will be completed many years after the 5G systems on the ground and in space are fully implemented.

At that point it is very unlikely that telecom companies would dismantle their systems even if it is shown that their technology is causing cancer and other diseases. They would just deny the risks.

They will tell us that the science was settled decades ago. They will tell us that evidence linking 5G to cancer and other diseases is just a conspiracy theory that only a few crackpots believe.

Millions of people will suffer from radiation exposure with symptoms such as headaches, weakness, brain fog, impaired ability to learn and reason, chest pain, and numerous other symptoms that will baffle most conventional physicians.

There is Nowhere to Hide from 5G Radiation
Today, it is possible to live in a location that has reduced levels of microwave exposure. This is accomplished by choosing a living space that is far away from cell phone towers.

However, in the near future, it won’t matter where we live, because 5G will irradiate us wherever we happen to live or work.

Cities Can’t Say No to 5G Implementation
FCC regulations have been structured in such a way that local municipalities cannot stop telecom companies from installing 5G. They are specifically prohibited from trying to delay or stop 5G implementation on the basis of health concerns. Their only recourse is to try to make the ground-based 5G system somewhat more esthetically pleasant.

Based on what has been happening around the country, telecom companies are sweeping aside local resistance and gaining approval for their 5G systems in rapid succession.

Can 5G Implementation be Stopped?
As far as I can tell, at this point, the only way that 5G will be stopped will be by congressional action. If enough people raise a stink with their elected officials, then perhaps 5G could be put on hold while studies are done to examine the true health risks.

Telecom investment in 5G has been massive. They are planning full implementation on the ground and in space in the next couple years. The time to object is now and not after hundreds of thousands of people become sick. [7]

If you would like to watch an in-depth presentation on the risks and hazards of 5G, then please view the following presentation.

Listen to Arthur Firstenberg discuss the history, science, and description of 5G, including 5G from satellites in space and its expected effects on all living things:

Cell Phone Task Force, Taos, New Mexico, August 2, 2018
You also may wish to review some of my previous articles about the risks of 5G and other forms of radio frequency exposure.

Public Waking up to Fact that 5G has not been Proven Safe for Human Health
5G Technology is Coming – Linked to Cancer, Heart Disease, Diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and Death
Cell Phone and Wi-Fi Exposure to the Eyes Causes Long-Term Damage
New 5G Cell Towers and Smart Meters to Increase Microwave Radiation – Invade Privacy
Smart Meters: Countdown to a National Crisis of Illness and Death
Will Driverless Cars Cause DNA Damage and Cancer?
How Big Technology Companies Control the Minds of the Masses through Smart Phone Addiction
About the Author
John P. Thomas is a health writer for Health Impact News. He holds a B.A. in Psychology from the University of Michigan, and a Master of Science in Public Health (M.S.P.H.) from the School of Public Health, Department of Health Administration, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

References
[1] “Planetary Emergency,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force.

[2] “5G – from Blankets to Bullets,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force.

[3] “WiFi in the Sky,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force.

[4] “5G from Space,” Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force.

[5] “2017 Space Launch Statistics,” – Spaceflight101.

[6] “Space Startup Apollo Fusion Wants To Use Mercury as a Fuel,” Avery Thompson, Popular Mechanics, 11/20/2018.

[7] Arthur Firstenberg, Cellular Phone Task Force, Taos, New Mexico, 8/12/2018. "

[onawah]

I am wondering if your opinion might change at all, Bob after viewing the posts starting here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1268078
and the post just above this one.

Posted by Bob (here)

That's some of my observations and logic. And why I am not concerned about 5G. It is only one more of a myriad of signals present, and the sun, if it goes away, or if it experiences extreme outbursts most definitely the normal "noise" is going to change dramatically. How organisms adapt to energetic changes will be better or worse depending on if they have learned to adapt to changes in stimulation.. Someone very fragile, not able to adapt who is absolutely unable to "live in the city" is going to succumb or be very unhappy. IMHO.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by onawah (here)
I am wondering if your opinion might change at all, Bob after viewing the posts starting here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1268078
and the post just above this one.

Posted by Bob (here)

That's some of my observations and logic. And why I am not concerned about 5G. It is only one more of a myriad of signals present, and the sun, if it goes away, or if it experiences extreme outbursts most definitely the normal "noise" is going to change dramatically. How organisms adapt to energetic changes will be better or worse depending on if they have learned to adapt to changes in stimulation.. Someone very fragile, not able to adapt who is absolutely unable to "live in the city" is going to succumb or be very unhappy. IMHO.

I agree with both Bob and onawah ... sort of.

I am quite concerned with 5G, and I am not all that greatly concerned with some more random transmitters in my environment in the 2 GHz to 80 GHz frequency range.

Quantity, and frequency, matter:

EMF emissions are like hot water. A small drop of warm water would usually not even be noticed; a tsunami of boiling water would kill you quickly. And warm (98.6F) water is the primary ingredient of our human bodies, absolutely vital to our being alive, as are a complex array of electrical-magnetic fields (EMF's) throughout our body's cells, tissues and organs ... an incredibly complex array, in space, time, frequency, and complex interactions.

I am not claiming that another increase in the cell phone network EMF radiation will be totally, absolutely, harmless. Almost no non-trivial change, either way, ever meets that criteria. Most likely any increase (or decrease) of our ambient EMF's will adversely effect at least a few people, just as an increase (or decrease) in the rainfall in an area will adversely effect at least a few people, plants, or animals.

But I am saying that one of the notions being offered by some of the opponents of 5G, the notion that, basically, the higher frequences necessarily present higher risk, is a false notion. It's almost as if some of the 5G opponents are saying (implicitly) that: "4G at about 2 GHz was bad; just think how much worse 5G at 80 GHz will be!!! 80 is 40 times 2. Be afraid, very afraid."

That I disagree with, and that I suspect is part of one of the often used deep state tactics:

To push a change on us that actually is dangerous, shout incessantly of some false danger with that change.

The deep state can use this false alarmism two (at least) ways:

1. Since the false danger never, or rarely, materializes, people begin to discount any alarms, even legitimate ones, raised by anyone, over that change.
2. "Blackwash" (discredit by association) those raising legitimate alarms with these over-hyped, "conspiracy theory" alarms of a false danger, as Chicken Little alarmists.

===

What I am concerned with, regarding 5G:

1. Phased-array antennas concentrating the EMF on our bodies and brains.
2. Pervasive surveillance using mobiles, IOT devices and the 5G infrastructure.

Any radio or other electro-magnetic (EM) emissions can be directed using phased-array antennas. Instead of the emitted energy being spread in many directions, like a candle, phased antenna arrays can focus EM waves mostly in a single direction, like a spotlight. The same light from a candle that barely lights a room will be uncomfortably bright, if focused on a single spot on the cornea of your eyeball. That light focusing is just the application of the equivalent of phased-array antennas, at the optical light frequency.

The most common frequencies used by Wi-Fi and Mobile these days are near to 2.4 GHz, which has a wavelength of 125 mm (5 inches). Our mobiles and handhelds are too small to contain very effective phased-array antennas at those frequences, so their emissions, as we hold them close to our bodies and brains, are not very focused, but rather spread out in many directions, like the candle burning in a room at night.

The frequences used by 5G will cover a wide range, from below 2.4 GHz to above 80 GHz. The lower frequencies go through walls (and heads and hands) more easily, but (as just noted in the previous paragraph) are too long in wavelength to be easily directed by our small handhelds. The higher frequencies are more easily blocked, but are short enough in wavelength that our handhelds, and the IOT devices scattered about our home, car and surroundings, can easily fit phased-array antennas that will focus those beams sharply, in order to aim the emitted power at the receiving cell tower. This avoids wasting precious battery power emitting lots of wasted radio waves, while cranking up the effective power in the specific direction of the other antenna (the cell tower), thus enabling higher bandwidth data transmissions. A precisely directed radio beam is more efficient and powerful ... more power where you need it, and less wasted elsewhere.

This is all well and good ... until you've got your handheld on one side of your head, talking to a cell tower on the other side. Your handheld is now beaming more intensely focused radio waves, right through your brain. The health problems that any of us would be subject to, if radiated with too powerful a signal, will show up in more people, thanks to the more focused radio beams.

This can work the same from the cell tower perspective. Rather than, as present, a cell tower generating poorly focused beams spread out over a wider area, in the future, when using the higher frequencies that 5G will sometimes use, the cell tower will be able to aim a larger number of more focused beams, at the specific active devices it is connecting to. So, to guess wildly on the actual numbers, instead of today's cell tower radiating over your entire neighborhood, rather weakly, to handle your latest cell call, rather at the higher frequencies the cell tower will be able to focus the beam onto just your house or backward. When this happens, your use of a cell phone (or of IOT devices) will put a more focused, and probably higher, EMF load on those other people, plants and animals near by to you. Of course, as cell towers get smarter, they will be increasingly adaptive in how much power they use for each connection, so as to save power while providing the desired quality of service (data rates) for each call. So it might be going to a higher frequency does not radiate your family more, but radiates your neighbors less, if that's all that that connection needs. In urban environments, the narrower beams at the higher frequencies reduce the background noise caused by the wasted energy going off to the side, allowing more active simultaneous active connections in densely populated areas. More intelligent cell towers in urban areas will actually be able to bounce narrow beams off buildings to get to a specific client device that might have no direct path to a cell tower, further increasing urban density.

This potential for more accurately focused radio beams, even from small, lower power, battery operated devices, along with the wide spread usage of IPv6 (the Internet Protocol (IP) addressing able to handle (thousands, billions, ... I don't know ... but a lot of) devices per square foot over the entire planet, are two key technologies that will enable connecting practically everything imaginable to the Internet. A vast grid of land based 5G towers (and on the ground), along with tens of thousands of 5G satellites, will keep us very "well connected."

So the second concern also arises from the more focused beams possible at the higher frequencies that 5G will be able to use when it chooses. This concern is that 5G will help raise the global surveillance grid to a new level of pervasive ubiquity.

Of course, unmentioned above in my focus on the potential health risks of focused beams and the improved surveillance capacity, there is a third concern. That surveillance will not always be passive. Humans, along with plants and animals, are electrical beings. A world wide grid, on the ground and in tens of thousands of low earth orbit satellites, can doubtless be used for mind and body control, for better or worse.

[norman]

The Whoowhoo Black Goo Guru has a view . . . .

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0r5ofmfHcNI

[Hervé]

Wireless Radiation: Stop the 5G Network on Earth and in Space, Devastating Impacts on Health and the Environment

International Appeal: There are 26,740 signatories as of December 4, 2018

By Arthur Firstenberg Global Research, January 09, 2019
The Appeal

To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations
We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.

Executive summary
Telecommunications companies worldwide, with the support of governments, are poised within the next two years to roll out the fifth-generation wireless network (5G). This is set to deliver what is acknowledged to be unprecedented societal change on a global scale. We will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart” cities and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips and will be connected wirelessly to the Internet. Every person on Earth will have instant access to super-high-speed, low- latency wireless communications from any point on the planet, even in rainforests, mid-ocean and the Antarctic.

What is not widely acknowledged is that this will also result in unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned density of radio frequency transmitters is impossible to envisage. In addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one trillion objects a few years later. Commercial 5G at lower frequencies and slower speeds was deployed in Qatar, Finland and Estonia in mid-2018. The rollout of 5G at extremely high (millimetre wave) frequencies is planned to begin at the end of 2018.

Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.

If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.

Immediate measures must be taken to protect humanity and the environment, in accordance with ethical imperatives and international agreements.

[...]

Full article: https://www.globalresearch.ca/wirele...onment/5665066

[Hervé]

Jim Stone's take on another facet of 5G:

UN staff member 5g war on humanity

Jim Stone's comment:

Now that I know how the antennas are configured, I have to agree. Shooting a pencil beam in a random direction (possibly straight through the user's brain depending on tower orientation) is totally negligent of all safety and proves the agenda is nothing but control , spying (via back scatter receivers) and actually causing a measured amount of harm ON PURPOSE.

They might even be able to eventually read people's thoughts by monitoring how that pencil beam ends up being affected by brain waves when it passes through people's brains.

I am going to bump a report on this topic from yesterday in case people missed it, it is very important

5G satellite launch

20, 000 satellites are soon to be launched for 5g. The tech being used defies common sense. I did not realize up to this point that the antennas, even in the 5G devices, are going to be able to focus their beams the same way Haarp does.

Let me explain how a radio beam is focused, using AM radio as an example:

Let's say your broadcast audience is in a narrow corridor (such as a valley in a mountain range). It will make no sense to send your radio signal where it won't be heard (back in the mountains, where only a few hikers are) so in such situations, multiple antennas are used. The tallest antenna will transmit the signal. Then passive antennas, spaced at precise intervals away from the active antenna, will cause the signal to be diverted in their direction. The more antennas in a row there are, the more focused the radio beam will be. The picture below shows an antenna array that will make an AM broadcast directional by 6DB (which will quadruple the effective broadcast power to a preferred zone) these antennas are for 1.52 MHZ so they are shorter than most AM radio antennas.

AM frequencies are very low compared to 5G, and antenna size is a function of the speed of light vs the frequency that will be transmitted at. To do a full wave antenna for an AM signal at 1 MHZ would therefore require an antenna that is 5, 280 x 186, 000 / 1, 000, 000 feet long. That equals 982 feet tall. There is an effect that allows AM antennas to work efficiently at around 62.5 percent of full wave length, so for 1 MHZ the antenna actually only needs to be a little over 600 feet tall. We have all seen such antennas, they are common.

That was a very short explanation, there is more to this than that, but it will suffice to explain how the illustration above can be implemented in a much smaller space, only the size of a cell phone.

AM radio, which ends at 1.7 mhz, requires very large antennas because the frequencies are so low. And low frequencies of the type AM used were not dangerous to people. But let's say your transmitted frequency is 1 GHZ. That would require an antenna only about 8 inches long. 5G, which operates at frequencies up to 80 times as high as that, requires antennas that are only about 1./10th of an inch long and the entire frequency range is potentially dangerous.

You can put lots of those little antennas in a cell phone, arranged like the AM radio illustration above, and therefore cause the 5G beam to become very focused, giving it the power it needs to punch through solid objects (which high frequencies absolutely hate to go through).

PROBLEM:

What if the satellite or tower is on the opposite side of your brain, and your cell phone decides to shoot a super focused beam through your brain to reach the tower? It cannot know where your brain is, or someone else's brain next to you. THIS IS A ROCK STUPID TOTALLY NEGLIGENT SYSTEM. I WILL NOT USE IT, THIS IS RETARDED BRAIN DAMAGE TYPE TERRITORY, IT CANNOT EVER BE DONE EVEN AT FRACTIONAL WATTAGE.

AS IF I want a phase array antenna pushed up to my head, shooting out a high intensity pencil beam! Oh, you won't notice the slowly creeping damage as your brain constantly re-assigns new neurons to complete the tasks that were done by the million or so that got wrecked from an hour long phone call. Those calls will only be sent directly through your brain for 50 percent of all calls anyway because sometimes the tower or satellite is favorably placed so don't sweat it. You've got trillions of neurons to waste, your brain "only uses 10 percent of them anyway" RIGHT? If the current batch of cell phones (which won't kill neurons outright because they don't shoot a pencil beam) were a problem because they caused cancer, JUST WAIT until 5G takes off. That tech is NOT FOR ME, 3g is working JUST FINE and I worry about even that!.

5g is the type of system that goes in when the people making the decisions don't give a damn about you. They'd rather have their back scatter radiation scanners sending back high res images of the inside of your home so they can big brother you real good. That's the real reason why 5g is being implemented, BET ON IT and if you don't think they want you brain damaged, VACCINATE YOUR KIDS, AND GET YOUR DAMN FLU SHOT.

By the way, NO ONE at the golden globes actually accepted the flu shot, it was all a ruse. They know what the hell is going on. If you think the people pushing 5g want to improve your life, think again, they are the EXACT same people pushing the tainted vaccines. Brain damage may well be one of the "positive outcomes" of 5g that they are seeking, especially with them having the audacity to use pencil beams for it to work. Pencil beams are considered potentially dangerous, they are the radio form of a laser. You don't have that in a device operating at any sort of power levels around ANYONE if you care about whoever is using it.

==============================================

What I understood of the above is that a 5G phone/device is basically a DEW as explained by Dr Ginny Silcox here (<---) via wave guided beams (microwaves as pencils' pushers/suckers//vibrators).

[onawah]

I haven't seen birds, bees and other pollinators coming into the debate nearly enough.
They are already in severe decline, and we depend on them heavily for more than just birdsong, honey and beauty. They are a significant part of the food chain that we depend on.
We have a whole thread on Avalon devoted just to the survival of bees!

[James Newell]

I think we could also look at what we can do about all this microwave transmissions. Here is a link to a company that claims it can do something about it.

https://dq271.isrefer.com/go/AultHome/jamesk8/

If you go check out the video on the bloodtest and emf from a phone, it is interesting.

[onawah]

"The Dangers of #5G ... What Mainstream Media Does Not Allow Us To Debate!
STOP5G
TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2019
The Dangers of #5G and What We Are Not Being Told!
"Governments throughout the world are pushing for the rollout of 5G (Fifth Generation) technology as if it is just an upgrade from 3G and 4G.
THIS IS FALSE
01. Mobile and Wireless experts such as Nick Hunn and William Webb state that this technology does NOT guarantee better connectivity, faster speeds or reliability and that the huge amounts of tax payers’ money being used to fund this would have been better spent upgrading the 4G network AND been far cheaper.
02. 4G is between 1GHZ and 5GHZ whilst 5G Technology is 5GHZ to 300 Ghz but uses also companion signals below 5Ghz!
03. Bandwidths of 26-90 GHZ are to be utilised. This is the equivalent of 90 billion electromagnetic waves hitting the body per second – tens of Billions MORE electromagnetic waves than what we have been used to.
04. The difference will also be in wave lengths, millimetre wave lengths that are shorter and pulsed and can penetrate the skin easier.
05. There are already over 10,000 studies showing the radiation that we are exposed to using EM radio frequency levels from 3+4G.
06. 240+ international Doctors and Scientists in 41 countries have petitioned to stop this technology from being used and many citizens worldwide are against this being used in this way.
07. There are NO research studies on the long term effects of this onslaught of millimetre wave radiation but government agencies are going to go ahead regardless.
08. This type of radiation is called non-thermal or non-ionizing and government agencies have tried to deny that there is any danger despite the studies of medical and Independent researchers.
09. The technology is also government surveillance technology.
10. Millimetre waves (mmWaves) in the ultra-high bands can affect our cells and cause higher levels of cancers, strokes, heart problems – all the life threatening diseases that we already suffer from.
11. Also, the biggest insurers, Lloyds, have refused to insure against EMF injuries from using phones, etc.
12. According to the Infrastructure Commission in the UK, small cell towers will need to be placed between 100 and 300 meters apart EVERYWHERE.
13. The so-called ”Internet of Things” means even household appliances will use this technology and smart cars will also contain heavy radars systems that will spew out EMR (electromagnetic radiation) from all angles – magnify this by millions of cars!
Government Agencies and University funded research is being paid for by the telecommunications Industry who stand to profit. Government can no longer be trusted to put our health before profits. If this technology is supposedly safe, why do the American military use millimetre wave technology weapons that disperse crowds, causing burns to the skin?
We demand Independent, long term, medical and safety research BEFORE this technology is rolled out in our streets and homes. Those who force this technology on us without proper safety assessments will be served Notices of Liability and will be personally liable for any harm that this technology causes."
Further Info at: inpowermovement.com
http://stop5g.whynotnews.eu/?page_id=522
Research Stop5G.net
Like: Fb.me/Stop5G
Join: Fb.com/groups/Stop5G

[Pam]

Posted by onawah (here)
Also some discussion about 5G on this thread:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...06#post1264606
Following, I've copied post #1 by Arcturian108in that thread:

Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
Folks,
I have yet to watch this two-hour video, but think it might be so valuable that I don't wish to hold up your viewing of it in case it is taken off the web.

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cli...ve-never-seen/

Alexandra Bruce, of "ForbiddenKnowledgetv.net" sent the video to her list this morning with the following explanation: "There is so much mind-blowing original content coming out on YouTube lately, it was hard to choose one that best represents the zeitgeist of the day but I settled on this very odd broadcast by the Leak Project with Clif High, in which the latter speaks in a kind of code in order to ward of the censorbots of Google-YouTube, referring to this episode as a "LARP" (live-action role playing).

Clif says that a million people are being abducted by aliens around the world every year, mostly outside the US and that beneath the political theatrics, the US, Russians and Chinese are working together to manage what they perceive to be a threat. He believes that something akin to what happened when Neanderthals were replaced by Homo sapiens is under way right now, where we are being replaced.

Clif says, "I'm also quite convinced that some odd things are involved in our war against the aliens. One of these odd things is the 5G network. So, 5G is gonna roll out all around the planet. It's gonna roll out and there isn't anything any human can do because we need that 5g as a very large – at least in the minds of the military – strategic weapon against the space aliens."

Clif then explains that the millimeter wave band used in 5th generation (5G) communications technology was originally used in scanning near-field microscopes, whose resolution he says is perfect for examining DNA. The TSA scanners at the airport also use the millimeter band in their scanners. Clif suggests that the military has people trained to use these millimeter scanners to detect the DNA of hybridized humans.

It gets weirder. He says, "Right now, there's something going on that seems to suggest the USA government might be captive by the aliens and the Chinese and the Russians don't like this...
Clif explains that mind control is the primary weapon of the invaders. "Space aliens can control our minds they can actually control the neural pathways in our brains and they can do so, such that they could eliminate me from your vision I could be sitting there I could be coughing and hacking and they decide what you will hear and see of my presence and they can do this relatively easily...they are able to control our brains through their inbuilt telepathic abilities...

"The 5G Network...could be used, in my opinion to disrupt the ability of the hybrids to control human thought...so it may be that in order to have a free mind in the future...we have to live in 5G envelopes, in order to be relatively free from being screwed with by the space aliens, as they proceed with their evil plan to conquer Earth."

Clif goes on to share numerous anecdotes from his experience and those privately shared with him from people all over the world."

I'm kind of curious where Clif is getting all of this information? Last year he was the king of cryptocurrencies saying their value would go through the roof and selling financial information and now he is telling us we humans are being replaced and the USA government might be captive by the aliens and the Chinese and the Russians don't like this... Is he using the same computer data technique that has proved him wrong so many times in the past?

[onawah]

Your guess is as good as anyone's!

Posted by peterpam (here)
I'm kind of curious where Clif is getting all of this information? Last year he was the king of cryptocurrencies saying their value would go through the roof and selling financial information and now he is telling us we humans are being replaced and the USA government might be captive by the aliens and the Chinese and the Russians don't like this... Is he using the same computer data technique that has proved him wrong so many times in the past?

[onawah]

Award Winning Journalist Exposes Wifi Disaster in Canadian Public School that Injured Dozens of Children
BY PHILLIP SCHNEIDER ON JANUARY 8, 2019
https://phillipschneider.com/award-w...s-of-children/

"“Two children have dropped dead in Simcoe County Schools since Wi-Fi was installed…” ~Rodney Palmer

Wireless technology is largely seen as benevolent and kind. Any danger to our health is typically passed off to the next generation to figure out, regardless of the consequences that have happened already. This story has played out many times in the past, whether it be DDT, cigarettes, or leaded paint. However, as Wifi proliferates throughout our schools with potential dangers for our children’s health, some are courageous enough to fight back against this under-studied science.

Rodney Palmer, an award-winning Canadian journalist and Communications Advisor at the Safe School Comittee, has been speaking out about the dangers of Wifi in public schools since at least 2010. In a presentation to the Royal Society of Canada, he spoke about a wifi disaster at a public elementary school that injured dozens of students. The story is quite remarkable.

“When the schools installed the wifi, we found out that at least four children had erratic tachycardia [fast or irregular heart rate] that confounded their doctors and they were wearing heart monitors to school. The older children…told us they had blackouts in certain areas of the school.” – Rodney Palmer


Do children have a particularly low resistance to wireless radiation? According to Rodney Palmer, many school-aged children report a negative reaction from exposure to Wifi since its introduction to public schools. These children cite headaches, irregular heart rate, and blackouts as potential reactions to the technology.

“Anyone could make the argument that you could safely spray any amount of pesticide on any person for any amount of time, although that once thought to be okay, and that’s the current government thinking with microwave radiation.” – Rodney Palmer

If you’re an adult and you want to have Wifi in your house, you can make the decision about whether you want to use a technology that may harm your health; that’s part of what it means to be free. However, the story starts to change when we talk about children.

Most parents would do anything that they can to keep their children safe, and if getting rid of Wifi at home does the job then so be it. But when children are in places where they are forced by the government to spend most of their childhood, it’s no longer up to the parents to aid their child’s health. It’s up to a bureaucracy which likely doesn’t have the same agenda as the parent. In one school’s case, they told the parents that there was no other option.

“The Simcoe County District Schools Board said no. They said the children must be exposed to Wifi at school. Even the children who were sick and presented to the school board themselves were told no, you may not plug your computer into the wall. You must sit all day in a sea of microwave radiation.”

Because of safety code 6 in Ontario, the school board does not have to acknowledge a parent’s complaint about this issue because the code considers the radiation to be completely safe. However, appropriate long-term testing has not been done to determine whether some children are affected negatively by wireless radiation.

“So, we were right! Our kids were sick at school and nowhere else. There was no mold problem, no recent renovation, chemical building materials. Only a newly installed massive WIFI system. They measured and found that radiation created by the WIFI exceeded Safety Code 6 thermal threshold by 34%. And that explained how my son came home from school with hot ears every day. He was being cooked by microwaves.

School WIFI operates at 2.4 GHz, the same frequency as a microwave oven.

So, did they shut it down?

Evacuate the school?

Did they alert the teachers? Parents? Students?

No!” [Source]

No, the Simcoe County District School Board kept it quiet. They told no one. They downplayed the results as insignificant and failed to tell the parent who were BEGGING for answers.

Unfortunately, in many western countries, children are given few options as to where their education may take place. In the UK, laws have been introduced forcing parents to pay fines of up to £120 because of their child’s tardiness to school. This type of law appears to be popping up around the world, where parents are granted littler control over the life and health of their child.

As several children have had unexplained health issues in suspicious connection with Wifi radiation, the question should not be whether we can prove for a fact that Wifi caused the incidents, but whether we should be forcing a potential danger on the world’s children just because we can’t prove for a fact that it was not.

“The ‘weight of evidence’ model is weighted in favor of science payed for by the wireless industry. As you all know, science can be manipulated, but cardiac arrest can’t.” – Rodney Palmer

Read more articles from Phillip Schneider.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Phillip Schneider is a student and a staff writer for Waking Times.

This article (Award Winning Journalist Exposes Wifi Disaster in Canadian Public School that Injured Dozens of Children) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Phillip Schneider and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement."

(Children are being used as guinea pigs and are valued as little more to the industries creating these technologies,or to the lamestream media, and apparently now even schools, than "collateral damage". With 5G these technologies aren't becoming less dangerous, but more so. Despite deniers, responsible sources are testifying to it. )

[onawah]

Senator Blumenthal Seeking Answers on Health Risks Posed by 5G wireless technology
Environmental Health Trust
Published on Dec 6, 2018
https://ehtrust.org/u-s-senator-rich...ealth-hazards/

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hnF1_sa1cMw

"The new 5G wireless network from companies like AT&T and Verizon promises faster speeds and more connectivity for the customer, but is it actually, well, safe?

According to one senator from Connecticut, we still don’t know yet — even with thousands of the smaller new towers expected to be built by the end of 2019, for the sole purpose of bathing the country in the same form of millimeter wave radiation used by airport body scanners.

The new 5G is a major step forward for wireless technology communications, experts say. But it also could be one of the biggest health mistakes in human history, if the results of a recently released 10-year, $30 million study are any indication.

5G Carries “Unknown and Unstudied” Health Risks, Senator Warns

Echoing a call to action from Dr. Joel Moskowitz, a renowned public health expert from the University of California-Berkeley who called the technology a “massive health experiment on all species,” Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal called on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to ensure the safety of millions of Americans. https://althealthworks.com/17136/a-m...-of-5g-towers/

The true effects of 5G are “unknown” and have been “understudied,” the senator said at his December 3 press conference, which can be seen in its entirety below.

“That is a sign of neglect and disregard on the part of the Federal Communications Commission that seems unacceptable,” he added.Blumenthal, who has previously called for the creation of a new food agency to replace the FDA, has long been focused on health, and he doesn’t believe that the FCC is following proper scientific method with 5G.

“In order to reach a conclusion about the health and safety of this new technology, we need facts,” he said. “We need evidence.”

Evidence on 5G cancer risks hasn’t been uncovered yet due to a lack of research, but lesser frequencies from 2G and 3G cell phones have already been linked to cancer in a $30 million study on rats.

The study, which lasted ten years and was released on Nov. 1, was mentioned by Blumenthal as a major red flag.

As noted in this article from the Connecticut newspaper the Journal Enquirer, the National Toxicology Program released research finding “clear evidence” that male rats exposed to high levels of radio frequency radiation, comparable to frequencies used in 2G and 3G cellphones, developed cancerous heart tumors.

Current safety standards for the powerful wireless towers are based on outdated technology from 1996, Blumenthal noted. If these less powerful technologies are capable of such a risk, what effect will the new 5G towers have on humans and animals alike?Nearly one million of the souped-up 5G towers are expected to be installed across the country by 2026. If the safety data is as thin as Blumenthal and researchers believe it is, human beings and animals alike will become test subjects.

“I don’t want to minimize the advances or the progress that it may reflect, that it will make the Internet quicker and maybe more reliable,” Blumenthal said at the press conference, discussing a letter he wrote to the FCC.

“But at what cost is the question. And all I’m asking from the FCC is do your job and study the health hazards.”
How to Oppose 5G in Your Area
Already, one California town managed to stop 5G towers from being constructed using strategies like the ones below.
The website EMFSafetyNetwork.org "

[Hervé]

Despite Winning Court Case: Scientist Faces Jail for Warning about 5G

By wmw_admin on January 18, 2019
B.N. Frank – Activist Post Jan 16, 2019

Since 2017, 241 scientists and doctors from the U.S. and around the world have demanded a moratorium on the installation of 5G wireless technology due to biological and environmental risks.


Activist Post already reported about the 5G court case that was won in Gateshead, England after 5G was installed in street lamps and people became sick. Scientist, Mark Steele, was part of the movement to get the 5G removed and Gateshead council members weren’t at all happy about that.


From Zero5G.com:

Mark Steele, a 5G campaigner, has been highlighting the dangers of a secret 5G rollout by Gateshead Council where residents are complaining of increased illness and Cancer in the affected area. There’s enough evidence to conclude the new smart 5G arrays on the top of new LED lampposts emit Class 1 Radiation frequencies and should be treated as a danger to the Public. Gateshead Council ignorantly rebutted clear evidence and created false allegations on social media posts and printed leaflets stating that Mark Steele is spreading Pseudo Science and that the arrays are not dangerous or 5G:
[…]
They misused Police Powers to gag Mark Steele and yesterday he left a free man and Gateshead Council to fork out £11k of taxpayers money to cover the court cost amounting to woeful ignorance. In Court, none of the Council Officers could explain what 5G is; and their leading Government expert refused to attend the Court hearing.
In conclusion, the Judge refused to gag Mark, stating: “The public have a right to know.”
[…]
The Judge declared Mark Steele as a credible expert and engineer on EMF and GSM technologies, which proves Gateshead Council are liable for corruption, misleading the public, making people ill and attempting to discredit Mark Steele and all others such as Smombie Gate fighting 5G rollouts.

Regardless of all of this, Mark now seems to be facing jail time for continuing to warn the public about 5G as well as expecting Gateshead council members to answer questions. So much for democracy…

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WrMu7CvBgBs

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=82FHImoueac

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=H_f9gpg4t6c

5G is still being forced on communities all over the world despite all the opposition, risks, and consequences associated with it. If this concerns you, visit the following websites for more information on what you can do to stop it:

• Wireless Information Network
• Americans for Responsible Technology
• 5GExposed
• 5G Information
• Center For Safer Wireless
• Center For Electrosmog Prevention
• Citizens for Safe Technology
• Electricsense
• EMF Safety Network
• Environmental Health Trust
• In Power Movement
• Last Tree Laws
• My Street, My Choice
• Our Town Our Choice
• Parents for Safe Technology
• Physicians for Safe Technology
• SaferEMR
• Scientists for Wired Tech
• TelecomPowerGrab
• We Are The Evidence
• WhatIs5G

Source

[avid]

I noticed our local street lamps were all being fitted with new ‘controllers’ on the top last week....
Hopefully nothing nefarious....

[Akasha]

Nice One, Hervé. I was listening to Mark Steele on Field McConnell's Abel Danger YT channel this afternoon and thinking this has to go on Avalon NOW! Thanks for saving me the trouble (and for a much more comprehensive post than I could ever have done).

[ExomatrixTV]

MICHAEL HENRY DUNN: ASCENSION & THE 5G CRISIS

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_PSSr-Gqka4

[ExomatrixTV]

• 5G - War on Humanity - David Icke

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳