Stop 5G before it's irreversible!

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
But my key point in this post is that such harmful impacts on a modest subset of the population are probably NOT the primary motivation for the aggressive rollout of 5G that is upon us. Those impacts are just collateral damage.

The primary motivation, I figure, is to drive most users of (and IOT devices on) the Internet into a more easily controlled environment of mobile and IOT devices running approved apps.

As with printing presses and radio communications, the transition from the difficult Wild Wild West phase, to the deeply controlled and controlling phase, will take a few decades to realize its full potential.

But 5G, Wi-Fi for the World, is a key step in that process.

Posted by Paul (here)
Hmmm ... I wonder if Patrick Wood is reading this thread as a guest.

Three months after I posted the above post, warning of the controlled technocratic environment that will be leveraged on such technology as 5G, Patrick Wood published the following book:

Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order

From the Introduction (page 3) of this book:

With the rapid advances in Smart City technology, mass surveillance, the Internet of Things, 5G rollouts, and now massive censorship of all opposing positions, it seems that "game over" may have actually already been called; if not, it certainly is very close.

...
I agree with Patrick Wood. In my words:

5G is Wi-Fi for the World's Internet of Things.

From another corner of the Web, comes this article, discussing the use of technology to surveil and control the sometimes unruly Chinese people.

Zerohedge posted this article from Bill Blain's Morning Porridge: China Is Juggling Half A Dozen Flaming Hand Grenades While Walking On A High Wire:

============

...

China is a state juggling half a dozen flaming hand grenades while walking on a high wire suspended above a pit of hungry tigers - just like any other government, attempting to deliver peace and prosperity. But, China’s basis is very different to other economies, and it’s now approaching a critical period in its history - the next few years could see China evolve into something very much darker and different.

...

In the medium term [Chinese Premier] Xi is fighting a desperate battle to secure and enhance his position and reign back the communist party’s excesses - to fight corruption in the only way he believes China will understand: by being a strong dictator. He is not as secure as many in the West believe. Hence the recent moves towards a “cult of Xi” reviving memories of the Maoist era. It looks to the West that he is in control of the state, but experienced China hands tell me his control of the state is far less secure that any previous Chinese leader - there is a serious likelihood that any breakdown in the implicit state-citizen pact will be met with extreme violence, and Xi will be the fall-guy.

...

But, this get’s even more complex: Long-Term, China may be in a far stronger position - and that’s because of Tech. While the West agonises about how social media and big data might be abused and misused, the Chinese have no such civil-liberty foibles. Their tech-environment is now providing the data and direct oversight of individuals to enable a far more effective and functional secret police run state. The kind of data oversight available to the Chinese state will enable it to keep the lid of the populace

...

============

5G is a key part of this invasive and pervasive surveillance and control network.

Some will suffer noticeable and harmful biological effects, yes.

However the global grid enabled by a combination of technologies that includes 5G will provide the "nervous system" that turns humanity from packs of usually compliant, sometimes rebellious, sometimes conflicting, groups of people into a "body whole", with an "immune" system like that in our own bodies that can identify right down to the individual cell level, cells (aka humans, in this case) that have gone rogue or that are no longer useful, and "isolate" those cells from the rest of the body, or "recycle" the materials of those cells for other purposes.

Controlling leadership and behind the scenes power broker positions in such an integrated, planetary wide, technocracy monitored and managed, civilization, that is making use of the energy, propulsion and materials technologies currently known but kept secret from public view ... these will be very powerful positions ... no doubt sought after by those who seek power and control.

So far, humanity and especially those who gain the most power, have not shown itself to have the ethics, integrity and morality appropriate to such a position.

I remain concerned:

• I would not hand a machine gun to a school yard bully. Nor would I hand over control of Human Civilization 2.0 to those evil, Satanic, families who apparently have been most powerful in our civilization.
  
• I worry that the alarms raised, such as in this very thread, over the biological effects of 5G technology are (while true to a considerable extent) over-played, as a distraction from the more systemic changes that 5G, and related technologies, are enabling ... changing humanity from a conglomeration of warring tribes into a substantially more integrated, surveilled, controlled and technologically advanced civilization.

We seriously need to clean up our act.

[onawah]

From a woman's or a child's or especially a pregnant woman's perspective, that is a VERY SHORT-SIGHTED CONCLUSION.
Such decisions are almost invariably made by men for men, who seem to constantly forget that the health of women and children is critical to their own survival.
That perspective also fails to take into consideration the very considerable impact on human health that the COMBINATION of ALL the toxins and frequencies and heaven only knows what else is bombarding us 24x7 in total is having, NOT ONLY to humans, but to the plants, the animals, the insects and everything on this planet that we depend on for survival.
Adaptation can only be stretched so far.
And even supposing we survive the onslaught, what would the human race become?

Posted by Paul (here)
[*]I worry that the alarms raised, such as in this very thread, over the biological effects of 5G technology are (while true to a considerable extent) over-played, as a distraction from the more systemic changes that 5G, and related technologies, are enabling ... changing humanity from a conglomeration of warring tribes into a substantially more integrated, surveilled, controlled and technologically advanced civilization.[/LIST]We seriously need to clean up our act.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by onawah (here)
From a woman's or a child's or especially a pregnant woman's perspective, that is a VERY SHORT-SIGHTED CONCLUSION.

If my son were to marry, and his wife were to become pregnant, then I intend to use what influence I might have to minimize their exposure to EMF's, as well as to glyphosate, vaccines, and other toxins and dangers. I already take some such efforts to minimize my own exposure, and my son's exposure when he lives with me.

I agree that the biological effects of 5G technology are true to a considerable extent, as I stated in my post (and you quoted.)

I agree that mothers and their young children, before and after birth, are amongst the most vulnerable.

There are several such dangers in our "modern" lives. Those who take responsibility for their lives and the care of themselves and their children can usually find some way to reduce the risk of such dangers ... but not always. I also make considerable effort to improve my nutrition, and to the quite modest extent that I have any influence, my son's nutrition, as therein lies a key means to improve one's resilience to toxic food, water, air, meds, EMF's, chemicals, etc that are all around us.

I doubt that 5G rollout can be stopped, or even slowed much. I was working for AT&T ("Ma Bell") when cell phone technology began its rollout back in the late 1970's, and my son now works for Ericsson, installing cell phone tower equipment. 5G is happening, and happening hard and fast, over the next two or three years.

From my perspective there is a risk of turning the warnings of 5G into a bigger, but eventually hopeless, campaign, which will turn some of us more into hopeless victims, rather than informed and empowered agents working for the best interests of ourselves and those we care about. The call to "Stop 5G before it's irreversible" (this thread's title) is (I suspect) a potential problem two ways:

• It risks redirecting what could be our own valuable abilities to improve our own health and our children's health, to a potentially hijacked and eventually doomed, campaign.
• It risks distracting us from the widespread usage of such technologies as 5G to integrate humanity into a single sentient "super-being", in dire need of elevated morality and ethics in its power centers.

Take personal responsibility for what can be done personally, and seek global responsibility for what must be done globally.

[onawah]

I would much rather live on a planet of beings that are integrated with the planet, living in harmony and in accordance with natural laws.
From my perspective, the human race has not been permitted to do this because of interference from ET and other-dimensional races.
More and more advanced technology is not going to make us better, but more like them--MORE out of balance, unnatural, aggressive, rogue, unethical and immoral.

Posted by Paul (here)
From my perspective there is a risk of turning the warnings of 5G into a bigger, but eventually hopeless, campaign, which will turn some of us more into hopeless victims, rather than informed and empowered agents working for the best interests of ourselves and those we care about. The call to "Stop 5G before it's irreversible" (this thread's title) is (I suspect) a potential problem two ways:

• It risks redirecting what could be our own valuable abilities to improve our own health and our children's health, to a potentially hijacked and eventually doomed, campaign.
• It risks distracting us from the widespread usage of such technologies as 5G to integrate humanity into a single sentient "super-being", in dire need of elevated morality and ethics in its power centers.

Take personal responsibility for what can be done personally, and seek global responsibility for what must be done globally.

[onawah]

The connection between these two subjects will not be apparent unless you listen to the whole talk here:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=b87WQj3q0_w

Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1271110

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
From a woman's or a child's or especially a pregnant woman's perspective, that is a VERY SHORT-SIGHTED CONCLUSION.

If my son were to marry, and his wife were to become pregnant, then I intend to use what influence I might have to minimize their exposure to EMF's, as well as to glyphosate, vaccines, and other toxins and dangers. I already take some such efforts to minimize my own exposure, and my son's exposure when he lives with me.

I agree that the biological effects of 5G technology are true to a considerable extent, as I stated in my post (and you quoted.)

I agree that mothers and their young children, before and after birth, are amongst the most vulnerable.

There are several such dangers in our "modern" lives. Those who take responsibility for their lives and the care of themselves and their children can usually find some way to reduce the risk of such dangers ... but not always. I also make considerable effort to improve my nutrition, and to the quite modest extent that I have any influence, my son's nutrition, as therein lies a key means to improve one's resilience to toxic food, water, air, meds, EMF's, chemicals, etc that are all around us.

I doubt that 5G rollout can be stopped, or even slowed much. I was working for AT&T ("Ma Bell") when cell phone technology began its rollout back in the late 1970's, and my son now works for Ericsson, installing cell phone tower equipment. 5G is happening, and happening hard and fast, over the next two or three years.

From my perspective there is a risk of turning the warnings of 5G into a bigger, but eventually hopeless, campaign, which will turn some of us more into hopeless victims, rather than informed and empowered agents working for the best interests of ourselves and those we care about. The call to "Stop 5G before it's irreversible" (this thread's title) is (I suspect) a potential problem two ways:

• It risks redirecting what could be our own valuable abilities to improve our own health and our children's health, to a potentially hijacked and eventually doomed, campaign.
• It risks distracting us from the widespread usage of such technologies as 5G to integrate humanity into a single sentient "super-being", in dire need of elevated morality and ethics in its power centers.

Take personal responsibility for what can be done personally, and seek global responsibility for what must be done globally.

[onawah]

And there's a second part as well:
Narcissism, the New Faith - Part 2: Missionary Cult and the End of Society

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=buNFfb43oC0

...also posted on this thread:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1271110
...which is also relevant, though not very optimistic!
If you get that far, you will probably also want to listen to this interview:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5Ibu59P472A

[Universoul]

Has this been posted? It's an overview of the health effects of cell phone radiation and how it effects mitochondria, the surveillance state, and AI/entities that could be brought into the world with these technologies.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eN7UPXYX7ts

[James Newell]

5G is an Anti life technology. That is a well spoken line.

[Franny]

ΕX DΗS ΕMPLOYΕΕ TΕLLS ΑLL! Shocking INTΕRVIΕW on ΤΗIS CΟMNG TΕCΗNΟLΟGΥ

Yes, it's a rather clickbait title but this is a compelling interview - if true. Had to put that in there.

ΑNΟNΥMOUS lNSIDΕR shares what we all may face...AND HOW to PRΕPARΕ. ΕX-DΕPΑRTMENT of HΟMΕLΑND SΕC. ΕMPLOYΕΕ TΕLLS ΑLL she experienced with HΕR DΕCLINING health working next to FIVΕ GEE TΕCH! Shocking INTΕRVIΕW on RΕAL WORLD lMPACTS of ΤΗIS CΟMNG TΕCΗNΟLΟGΥ.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=pheiufl6TCA

Where you can get RF Meters to check your own microwave/RF/EMF levels at home: click here
https://tinyurl.com/yaxgfg8q - RF Meters

--
Where you can get shielded clothing to protect from RF:
https://tinyurl.com/ycz9g3lc

--
Where to get Shielding Bedding to block RF:
(also paint, curtains, fabrics, phone cases)
https://tinyurl.com/y8pe5r75

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by latte (here)
ΕX DΗS ΕMPLOYΕΕ TΕLLS ΑLL! Shocking INTΕRVIΕW on ΤΗIS CΟMNG TΕCΗNΟLΟGΥ

Yes, it's a rather clickbait title but this is a compelling interview - if true. Had to put that in there.

It sounds true to me, yes (and clickbait alarmist as well <grin>.)

The deficiency of critical nutrients in our typical fast food and grocery store foods, along with the toxins in our food, water, air, vaccines and pharmaceuticals, as well as excessively high levels of exposure to various EMF emissions, can and frequently do cause a variety of chronic, very serious, eventually fatal diseases.

The advanced imaging technology (AIT) in the full-body airport scanners used by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) emit pulse trains of electromagnetic waves that have frequencies from 24 to 30 GHz, which is within the same range (about 2 to 80 GHz) of various frequency bands being considered for use in the 5G cell network.

Also the entire airport scanning project is fraudulent, based on staged false operations (9/11, the shoe bomber, the underwear bomber), to impose and gain acceptance for a deeply tyrannical and oppressive level of surveillance, first in airports, and eventually in most other public transports and public arenas and events.

Dose matters. We are always exposed to essentially all frequencies across the entire EMF spectrum ... some of which is vital to our life and well being, in the right "dose". I like my room lit well enough at night that I can see things, but I don't like military power weapon lasers, capable of destroying an airplane or missile, being shone in my eyes ... my head would literally explode if that happened.

If I were King for a day, I'd send all the airport scanners to the junk yard, to be dismantled and recycled for parts and materials. I would permanently disband the TSA and leave airports and airlines to return to whatever security they found useful, such as prior to 9/11 of 2001. I would also declassify and release to the public the real story of 9/11.

I'd be a busy King that day (and these acts would be but a small part of my work that day.)

However I would not dismantle the transportation (roads, harbors, airports, cars, trucks, trains, planes, ships, ...) system, even though that system also maims and kills many people each year. Nor would I dismantle or stop all further deployment of the cell phone network, which already causes (contributes to causing, along with all the other toxins, fraudulent "standard of care" conventional allopathic medicine and nutritional deficiencies) a variety of chronic, sometimes fatal, diseases.

Cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships are a vital and useful technology in our present civilization, and cell networks are becoming increasingly so, in both good and bad ways.

We each should continue to do what we can at a personal level to live with and make use of these technologies in useful ways while minimizing the health risks, and to do what we can at a society level to improve the safety of these systems.

Hmmm ... I wonder if we could punish (once prosecuted and found guilty) the key people who pushed for and benefited from the airport scanners by requiring that they spend the remainder of their lives, 23 hours a day, confined to a cell that had a permanently powered on full body scanner in its cell walls, radiating the cell interior.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
Cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships are a vital and useful technology in our present civilization, and cell networks are becoming increasingly so, in both good and bad ways.

We each should continue to do what we can at a personal level to live with and make use of these technologies in useful ways while minimizing the health risks, and to do what we can at a society level to improve the safety of these systems.

Even more important than improving the physical safety of these systems is improving their information privacy.

When one cooperating oligarchy of institutions (corporations, governments, NGO's, ...) has exclusive shared access to the integrated accumulation of all the vast and very rapidly increasing volume of data on almost every human being on the planet, then that provides them a means, the key means, to enable pervasive and invasive surveillance, and hence pervasive and invasive control, of humanity, on both mass population and focused individual levels.

5G, as the world-wide Wi-Fi for the "Internet of Things", is a key component of this pervasive and invasive surveillance and control grid. Yes, 5G will be yet one more toxic element in our environment contributing to the chronic disease and eventual death of a sizeable fraction of humanity. But will even those, the majority, who survive, sometimes in good health, risk ending up being prisoners on their own planet.

The key, in my view, is decentralization of information access, so that no one institution has access to more than a modest subset of the available information about us. We are a long way from that happening, and seemingly getting further away each day.

[norman]

Paul. No matter how they divide up the data access zones at the front end for professional/business users, the techies will be the ones who can join it all up again, simply because they will have to be able to link it all up anyway.

It's not too unlike the idea that a gun ban will only mean that the bad guys have all the guns. If the cyber system is zoned all the techies will have the data power.

Not sure I want a future ruled by techies any more than by banksters.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by norman (here)
Paul. No matter how they divide up the data access zones at the front end for professional/business users, the techies will be the ones who can join it all up again, simply because they will have to be able to link it all up anyway.

It's not too unlike the idea that a gun ban will only mean that the bad guys have all the guns. If the cyber system is zoned all the techies will have the data power.

Not sure I want a future ruled by techies any more than by banksters.

I agree - We are quite unlikely to ever obtain final "victory" in the "data privacy" wars.

As with the gun ban, the struggle between the freedoms and powers of the collective and of the individual will continue, apparently for as long as human civilization continues at its present level of "spiritual" maturity. That struggle will end only when we either bomb ourselves back to the stone age, or advance somehow, in ways that I can only guess at, with hesitation.

However ... awareness that this is a struggle, in some ways the struggle, in which we are engaged is critical to our "staying in the game", lest the Satanic collectivist impulses carry the day and obtain a lasting and durable dominance.

We will not win, at least not our present level of awareness. We must see to it that they do not win either.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
The key, in my view, is decentralization of information access

Here's another example of increasing centralization of data about us (though entirely off the 5G topic of this thread): Uncle Sam Wants Your DNA: The FBI’s Diabolical Plan to Create a Nation of Suspects (TheDailyBell.com)

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
Just moving one's cell phone to the other side of one's body might be enough to block some of these higher frequencies

These higher frequencies that are being added to the range of frequencies allocated to 5G are easier for a small array of antennas (such as fits in a hand held mobile) to direct, as focused beams.

That means, for more frequent cell phone users, when their head happens to be between their mobile and the cell tower, their mobile will be directing a more focused beam right through their head. At the higher frequencies that 5G can reach more of that focused beam will be blocked by their heads ... meaning more of that radiation absorbed by their skulls and brains.

Jim Stone describes this in more detail in a post he made a couple of days ago:

===========

Cleaning up the mess: Let's get the details of 5G clear

5G is the LEAST penetrating of all wireless technologies by a factor of an average of 20 cubed. This means it has a hard time penetrating anything, including your skin. If anyone posts "it penetrates better than anything" they are wrong, and don't understand how frequencies behave. The fact that 5G has such a difficult time penetrating anything at all is what makes it dangerous.

Why would a lack of an ability to penetrate make it dangerous? Answer: Because of the type of phase array antenna all 5g devices need to function. The device can easily triangulate where the tower is because the frequencies are high enough to allow triangulation from only the antennas in a small device. The device, knowing exactly where the tower is, then uses a phase array antenna to blast a signal back to the tower. This would not be a problem if the device never tried to reach the tower through your brain, but if your brain is between it and the tower, you're going to have massively focused energy cutting a thin line through your brain, and it will definitely cause damage. And even if they figure out how to cause the device to normally point that beam away from you, what about other people nearby? They cannot be factored in. 5G is going to be a haphazard wave throw. Interestingly, because of the nature of how such devices work, mark my word: People will notice the device giving off "heat". It will definitely happen. it will "give off heat" but won't be hot itself. That's because the "heat" will be the radio waves getting absorbed by your body, with as much gain as they are using people are without question going to notice.

What's going to happen when your brain gets that heat, and you can't feel it? The brain itself can't feel injury, headaches are felt from the inside linings of blood vessels in the brain and not the actual neurons. You could fry lots of them and never feel a thing.

And the elite don't care, they are doing all they can to destroy our intelligence with shots they claim are vaccines and are clearly not. 5G brain damage would probably be an asset to them as far as they see it. I cannot believe they are legalizing it at all.

I will NEVER use 5g, EVER. I don't need a daily dose of brain damage!~

===========

The cell towers, and satellites, will radiate us, one and all, with a wide range of intensities and various frequencies, and we will have a wide range of abilities to stay healthy. Some, with more borderline health, will feel the effects of the cell tower radiation more. Some who use mobiles (even for texting or video watching) more often, or who are often close to someone else using a mobile, will receive more cell tower radiation, aimed in their general direction.

But talking on a mobile, while holding it on the other side of your head from the cell tower, will maximize the damage, to your brain. Children, with thinner skulls, will be especially vulnerable to this.

[onawah]

Scientists Warn of Health Effects: Washington DC Council 5G Small Cell Roundtable
Environmental Health Trust
Published on Dec 1, 2018

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ljLynbr5iPc

Senator Patrick Colbeck Testifies Against 5G: Hearing 2018
Environmental Health Trust
Published on Sep 3, 2018
Senator Patrick Colbeck Testifies Against the deployment of 5G because of the reported health effects from wireless technologies in a hearing 2018. Learn more about 5G at https://ehtrust.org/resources-to-tak...mlining-bills/

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=j-UEuOYOED4

[onawah]

The Dangers of 5G to Children’s Health by the Children’s Health Defense Team
2/13/19
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...urce=mailchimp



"Mobile and wireless technologies are a ubiquitous feature of modern life. Most U.S. adults own smartphones, a growing proportion are “smartphone-only” Internet users and over a fourth report being online “almost constantly.” As for children, a 2014 survey of high-income nations reported that almost seven in ten children used a mobile phone, and two-thirds of those had a smartphone, usually by age 10. As described by Nielsen, it is now as common to see “a kid with a smartphone in their hand” as it was to see “a kid playing with a yo-yo in the years before the digital age.”

The enthusiasm with which the public has embraced each new mobile and wireless technology—most of which have never undergone any appropriate safety testing or standards development—suggests that consumers rarely stop to consider the health implications of the infrastructure shoring up their ability to browse, stream and download anytime and “on the go.” Consumers are not entirely to blame for their lack of awareness—it is not easy to disentangle the technologies’ health risks in the face of the telecommunications industry’s steady and calculated disinformation efforts and a captured Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that “follows the script of fabulously wealthy, bullying, billion-dollar beneficiaries of wireless.”

… powerful 5G (fifth-generation) networks and technology are about to subject everyone, on a continuous basis, to unprecedented forms and amounts of mandatory irradiation—without prior study of the potential health impact or any assurance of safety.

Now, however, a global 5G “frenzy” is upon us and is coming into full force. The rollout of “blazing fast” 5G technology will “dramatically increase the number of transmitters sending signals to cellphones and a host of new Internet-enabled devices.” The time is ripe for greater grassroots awareness of the undisclosed tradeoffs between convenience and 5G’s potentially catastrophic health effects. Far from a simple “next-gen” upgrade, powerful 5G (fifth-generation) networks and technology are about to subject everyone, on a continuous basis, to unprecedented forms and amounts of what retired U.S. government physicist Dr. Ronald Powell calls “mandatory irradiation”—without “prior study of the potential health impact” or any assurance of safety. Considering that young people (with their smaller body mass and developing brains) are particularly vulnerable to radiation, the Environmental Health Trust has termed 5G “the next great unknown experiment on our children”—and the entire human population.

Early warnings
In fact, the “giant uncontrolled experiment” on children and adults has already begun, despite an urgent international appeal by tens of thousands of scientists, doctors, environmental organizations and citizens calling for a halt to 5G deployment. In 2018, telecom carriers in the U.S. and Europe began rolling out 5G technology in dozens of cities. Focusing (for now) on “dense urban and high-traffic areas” in the U.S., AT&T began positioning its 5G infrastructure in major cities in eight states, and Verizon started offering 5G home broadband service in “select neighborhoods” in a handful of cities.

… health problems such as insomnia, miscarriage, memory problems and other neurological issues, and there are widespread reports of annihilation of insect and bird populations.

For the most part, health concerns have ranked as a tiny footnote in the midst of the massive hoopla about 5G’s speed and capacity, although trade magazines admit that there may be “some objections” to 5G due to “concerns over potential health risks.” In both Europe and the U.S., however, individuals living and working in proximity to newly installed 5G towers and antennas are telling a different story. Many have immediately started experiencing health problems such as insomnia, miscarriage, memory problems and other neurological issues, and there are widespread reports of annihilation of insect and bird populations.

In response to complaints from fire fighters subjected to 5G antennas, the International Association of Fire Fighters has gone on record as opposing “the use of fire stations as base stations for towers and/or antennas for the conduction of cell phone transmissions until a study with the highest scientific merit and integrity…is conducted and it is proven that such sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members.”

A United Nations whistleblower recently drew attention to 5G’s dramatic impact on health in a widely circulated series of comments about 5G’s “seemingly overnight” rollout in Vienna, Austria. Describing 5G as a “silent war,” she commented:

“…Children are the most vulnerable to 5G depredation because of their little bodies. Friends and acquaintances and their children in Vienna are already reporting the classic symptoms of EMR [electromagnetic radiation] poisoning: nosebleeds, headaches, eye pains, chest pains, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, tinnitus, dizziness, flu-like symptoms, and cardiac pain. They also report a tight band around the head; pressure on the top of the head; short, stabbing pains around the body; and buzzing internal organs.”

Above and below
One of the novel dangers introduced by 5G technology is its reliance on high-frequency millimeter waves (MMWs), a bountiful and not previously commercialized portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. While 5G’s enthusiasts are quick to promise support for literally billions of devices, there is one catch—the shorter millimeter wavelengths cannot travel as far as the lower frequencies used for earlier generations of mobile technology. Thus, while there were about 300,000 wireless antennas on U.S. cell towers and buildings as of 2016 (a doubling since 2002), 5G will require “exponentially more”—millions of small cell towers every 500 feet “on every street corner.”

… even in the home environment, 5G technology [will] blast through walls and cribs, making a mockery of the notion that ‘your home is your castle’ in which you are supposed to be safe.

Organizations concerned about the health hazards of wireless radiation note that “Right now, you don’t have to live next to a cell tower….but once they have these [5G] cell antennas everywhere, you won’t be able to [move away].” Unfortunately, the “nowhere to hide” aspects of 5G are even more serious, because ground-based 5G systems will be supplemented by satellite-based systems. In March, 2018, the FCC approved the initial launch of over 4,400 low-Earth-orbit 5G communication satellites, to be followed by thousands more over the next two years—with the eventual result being 11 times more satellites orbiting the Earth than currently. The satellites will send “tightly focused beams of intense microwave radiation at each specific 5G device that is on the Earth,” while each device then sends “a beam of radiation back to the satellite.”

In practical terms, this means that in crowded locations such as airports, individuals’ bodies “will be penetrated by numerous beams of radiation as they walk or as other people walk around them with their 5G smartphones.” But even in the home environment, “5G technology [will] blast through walls and cribs,” making a mockery of “the notion that ‘your home is your castle’ in which you are supposed to be safe.”

More than skin-deep
Scientists, doctors and experts from around the world have issued repeated warnings about 5G’s risks, drawing on published research on MMWs as well as thousands of studies showing the harms caused by other mobile and wireless technologies.

In this context, industry and government claims that 5G technology is safe are completely disingenuous. In fact, the health effects of MMWs are already quite familiar to the U.S. military and defense agencies around the world. The U.S. has at its disposal non-lethal crowd control weapon systems (euphemistically named Active Denial Systems) that use millimeter waves to penetrate the skin of targeted individuals, “instantly producing an intolerable heating sensation that causes them to flee.” In research commissioned by the U.S. Army “to find out why people ran away when the beam touched them,” they discovered that targets “feel like [their] body is on fire.” Researchers also have warned that “the same parts of the human skin that allow us to sweat also respond to 5G radiation much like an antenna that can receive signals.”

Moratorium urgently needed
When the FCC endorsed the transition to 5G in 2016, then-Chairman Tom Wheeler (a former telecom industry lobbyist) vowed “to allow new [5G] technologies and innovations to evolve and flourish without needlessly prescriptive regulations.” Thus, even though 5G represented a radical shift in technology, the FCC proposed no further safety studies, instead continuing to rely on its “outdated, excessively permissive, and thus widely criticized, radiation-exposure guidelines that…are based primarily on a 30-year-old analysis…many years before the emergence of most of the digital wireless technology in use today.” A recent government study by the National Toxicology Program—which determined that cell phone radiation causes cancer—deemed the three-decade-old guidelines “unprotective.”

… children who began using either cordless or mobile phones regularly before age 20 had more than a fourfold increased brain tumor risk.
5G poses risks to all life on the planet—people, animals, insects and plants. However, it is clear that fetuses and children are among the most vulnerable members of the human population. Even prior to 5G, Swedish researchers concluded that “children are indeed more susceptible to the effects of EMF exposure at microwave frequencies” and reported that children who began using “either cordless or mobile phones regularly before age 20” had more than a fourfold increased brain tumor risk. Describing brain cancer as “the proverbial ‘tip of the iceberg,’” the researchers also observed that “no other environmental carcinogen has produced evidence of an increased risk in just one decade.”

The UN whistleblower states, “People’s first reaction to the idea that 5G may be an existential threat to all life on Earth is usually disbelief and/or cognitive dissonance. Once they examine the facts, however, their second reaction is often terror. We need to transcend this in order to see 5G as an opportunity to empower ourselves, take responsibility and take action.” Some of the actions that people have taken include signing the International Appeal; learning about the multiple reasons to be concerned about 5G radiation and telling others; talking to legislators about why rushing legislation that streamlines the deployment of 5G small cells is a bad idea (and also raising the awareness of legislators and state utility commissions about the risks of smart meters); and changing their relationship to their devices, including using wired rather than wireless Internet connections (or turning off WiFi routers at night) and adopting other simple steps.

5G promises to create an even “denser soup of electrosmog,” with incalculable health effects. In fact, any sane person who examines the evidence must concur with the authors and over 40,000 signatories of the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, who agree that the rush to blanket the planet with 5G “constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.” "

[avid]

In the last 2 days, Border News NW UK, have stated they are trialling 5G at Alston, an extremely ‘cut-off’ large village in the hills here. Interviewing locals,there seems no dissention, but if I were them, I’d be monitoring health issues ‘avidly’.
Today, there were planned electricity supplies cut-offs. Goodness knows what these poor isolated folk are being subjected to.
They are frequently cut off during snow events, but this makes them an ideal ‘isolated’ experimental unit, as the one in Gateshead has been outed and going through the courts still. Expert witness supported by Judge. Apparently, other areas in UK holding off until further evidence of health issues resolved....

https://www.hexham-courant.co.uk/new...orth-pennines/

http://www.cybermoor.org/

https://www.smombiegate.org/5g-court...-soros-and-un/

[edina]

There's a guy I follow on Facebook.

I'm too busy to keep up with his blog, yet.

He has been posting information about 5G, and it's affect on mitochondria.

It's excellent information.

His name is Dr. Jack Kruse, his page is Optimized Life.

And another great source of information on this topic is A Microwaved Planet.

I don't know if you're already familiar with them, or not.

But, I thought I would share them here, while I still can.

[Hervé]

Los Angeles firefighters report neurological damage after cell tower installation near their station

Arjun Walia Collective Evolution
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:01 UTC

The conversation about 5G within the mainstream is becoming quite concerning for onlookers, as there's been an increase in awareness about the health concerns of wireless radiation. Sure, there are natural sources of electromagnetic radiation on both ends of the spectrum in our environment, but never before has humanity experienced this much. The main reason why this is so concerning is because:

"Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects." (Dr. Sharon Goldberg, 5G Small Cell Tower Hearing In Michigan)

You don't have to look hard to find the scientific research pertaining to wireless radiation, cell phones, electrical lines, etc. That being said, "waiting for high levels of scientific and clinical proof before taking action to prevent well-known risks can lead to very high health and economic costs, as was the case with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco." (The European Commission).

Here you can find a list of citations for 1,670 peer-reviewed scientific papers about electromagnetic fields (EMF) published in scientific journals dating back to 1979 all the way through to 2018.

Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.

The statement above comes from Martin L. Pall, PhD & Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University. He wrote a very informative report, titled 5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them.

That's also something you may want to check out.

What's really concerning here is the fact that this issue is completely ignored by our federal health regulatory agencies. I'm more so referring to North American agencies, as multiple countries around the world have completely banned wireless technology inside of schools and nursery homes due to health concerns. Take France, for example. They passed a law in 2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools. The law states that Wi-Fi must be turned off in all elementary schools when it's not in use. A wired connection, if possible, is preferred. This could also be a great solution for your home, and a wired connection is much faster than a wireless one. France is one of dozens of examples.

It really highlights the connection between big corporations and our federal governments. In North America, corporations control science, safety, what gets approved and what doesn't get approved. It's a huge problem.

"Because there's absolutely no question. There are people in government, who truly agree when I talk with them, they agree that this mine shouldn't go ahead, or that damn shouldn't be built, or Monsanto shouldn't be allowed to test its seeds here. It's corruption really, the might of money, the corporations that hold governments in their hands, because of lobbying power and so forth, it's really frightening." - Jane Goodall

That being said, it's great to see so many people taking initiative. We must act, and we must continue to create awareness and help shift human consciousness in several areas. Take, for example, a city by the name of Peterborough in Ontario, Canada, near Toronto where Collective Evolution is based.They have developed an information sheet to help organizations accommodate individuals who have electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). Symptoms of electromagnetic sensitivity include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, a lack of energy, fatigue, flu like symptoms, and much more.

Scientists, researchers, and people of all backgrounds have been creating awareness about this subject for a long time, but we have not heard much from mainstream media. And it seems that when they do cover it, it's often a ridicule piece hinting at 'pseudoscience.' Again, this is quite concerning.

Below is an example of what I am referring to, something that goes beyond the science and into actual human experience, as many of us are feeling the effects of EMFs. The video is from of Dave Gillotte, Fire Captain and Union President at Los Angeles County Fire Fighters.

Dave Gillotte
Fire Captain / Union President at Los Angeles County Fire Fighters Dave Gilotte, who is also a 25-year veteran fire fighter, gave his testimony at the Los Angelas California Board of Supervisors meeting in 2016. In fact, it's important to note that firefighter groups in the United States have long opposed cell towers on their stations. Not only that, but in California they have been able to be exempt from the forced placement of towers on their stations because of the strong opposition they have due to health concerns from the radiation.

This wasn't even a 5G tower, which is what we are heading for next.

Dr. Gunnar Heuser lead brain studies on firefighters following a cell tower installation on their fire station and found that their brains were all abnormal. His SPECT brain study in 2004 focused on firefighters who complained of neurological problems following a cell tower installation at their fire station beforehand. The symptoms they experienced were: headaches, memory problems, sleeping problems, depression, and anxiety. Dr. Heuser published a study recently on fMRI showing abnormalities in EHS similar to brain injury. Original study published in July 2017, without the controls, full text: Corrigendum to the study, which includes fMRI scans of the controls (non- EHS)

Below is a video of the hearing mentioned above.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=s-x_xv6dg9E

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS (IAFF)

• "The IAFF opposes the use of fire stations as base stations for towers and/or antennas for the conduction of cell phone transmissions until a study with the highest scientific merit and integrity on health effects of exposure to low-intensity RF/MW radiation is conducted and it is proven that such sitings are not hazardous to the health of our members."

• The IAFF Official Position Against Cell Towers on Fire Stations passed in 2004.

• This position was initiated after increasing complaints among firefighters with cellular antennas on their stations coupled with the California study showing neurological damage in California firefighters conducted by Dr. Gunnar Heuser.

Read the Press Release on the Firefighter Resolution and Research Study that found Neurological Damage

Read the Affidavit of Susan Foster detailing the study and findings here

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=61h_vuBujw0

Related:

• Hundreds of birds dead during 5G cell phone tower experiment in The Hague, Netherlands

• City blocks 5G cell tower installation over claims that it can cause cancer

• Largest ever cell tower radiation study confirms link to cancer

• Cell phone tower hypocrisy: Rescuing firefighters not kids

• India's Supreme Court shuts down cell tower after man claims EMF radiation gave him cancer

• The growing cell tower menace to our health