Cockburn’s sources at The Spectator are EXTREMELY suspect.
And indicting the kids requires Mueller to make his case to Barr, providing all the hard evidence he’s acquired over the past two years, so Barr can sign off on the indictment.
Yeeeaaaaaaaah, that ain’t happenin’ because you and I both know, no evidence exists.
I don’t know how Q expects any of the Anons to get all these indictment counts he requested, but this looks like more pretty transparent BS. I highly doubt Barr had to pull anything Mueller filed, so the only reason I think Q is posting this absolute nonsense is to provide more cover for Mueller.
I do think, however, that there is something to this idea that Mueller is going to indict POTUS’ kids, in terms of… building a useful narrative, and baiting out more deep-state/media assets/Dems in the process.
Think of it – any Trump-related indictment is like catnip to the #LunaticLeftists. So all the White Hats would need to do is play some “he-said-she-said” and suddenly… you see articles like this popping off.
With Q “confirming” that this is what really happened, Mueller gets another layer of cover (or at least, plausible deniability), to see him through the home-stretch.
(Or, at least that’s how I see it. We’ll see if I’m right in a very short time, I imagine – and I’m happy to be wrong, as well).
Re: The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks