The US Vaccine issue is more than just about "The Shots", it's the Totalitarian Tiptoe

[Delight]

JULY 22, 2018 ·
Autoimmunity following Gardasil

Have you noticed how many young girls who have become so unwell following Gardasil report the worsening of their symptoms after the second shot.

This research by Pompilio Martinez, MD from the School of Medicine, National University of Colombia explains why.

Martinez’s survey reveals an overall pattern of peripheral nervous system damage as demonstrated by complaints of inflammatory and neuropathic pain syndromes in the head, back, chest, arms and legs. There were also sensory and motor syndromes with upper and lower limb numbness and tingling (paraesthesia), muscle weakness and difficulty walking (paresis) accompanied by tremors, muscle spasms and twitches (abnormal movements).

Pompilio Martinez describes the neurological symptoms of 62 girls who were vaccinated against the human papilloma virus (HPV). The quadrivalent HPV vaccine Gardasil was given to 61 Colombian girls and and the bivalent Cervarix was administered to one Mexican girl.

Martinez’s survey reveals an overall pattern of peripheral nervous system damage as demonstrated by complaints of inflammatory and neuropathic pain syndromes in the head, back, chest, arms and legs. There were also sensory and motor syndromes with upper and lower limb numbness and tingling (paraesthesia), muscle weakness and difficulty walking (paresis) accompanied by tremors, muscle spasms and twitches (abnormal movements).

It was found that most of these debilitating symptoms developed after the second shot of the HPV vaccine which corresponds to the greater antibody titres that occurs after booster vaccines. Dr Martinez explains the common process of adding an aluminium adjuvant to the vaccine in order to strengthen the immune response and subsequent antibody production.

However as a result a serious problem can occur if antibodies attack other tissues in the body inducing a process called ‘molecular mimicry’. These are called ‘cross-reacting’ antibodies or auto-antibodies and are capable of inducing disease in the body.



Initial exposure to the vaccine or infection induces the production of immunoglobulin which increases over several weeks after vaccination. Then with a repeated dose of the vaccine body cells are reactivated causing very high antibody concentration. Importantly these cross- reacting antibodies are reactivated also and minor damage can be worsened.

Some of these examples of molecular mimicry manifest as nerve demyelination and are experienced as muscle weakness, numbness and neuropathic pain. Some very unfortunate girls and boys develop respiratory muscle problems and require intubation and ventilation.

One of the striking findings of the survey was that symptoms developed after the second dose of the HPV vaccine. After the first dose only 15-30% of girls had symptoms but 48-80% were symptomatic after second dose. Symptom onset and disease severity increase with doses because of increased antibody titres.

This is what we are seeing in the girls who have become unwell after 2 or 3 doses of Gardasil. Frequently their stories are of worsening disease after the second dose of Gardasil.



In my book Gardasil: Fast-Tracked and Flawed I wrote about Australian woman Kristin Clulow and her battle with ill health following Gardasil. In May 2008, the 26-year-old Australian woman received the first dose of Gardasil, one of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines on the market. Two weeks later, the fit young woman fell and broke her left foot and although perplexed at the ease at which she had incurred her fracture, she didn’t think the two events were connected. In August 2008, she dutifully turned up at her doctor’s office for her second shot of Gardasil. But shortly after this injection, Kristin’s health began to unravel. It started with a temporary loss of vision and mobility problems that made it impossible for her to run, jump, dance or wear her beloved heels. Then her handwriting failed her: “Handwriting just doesn’t suddenly go,” she cried. Worse was to come when Kristin’s speech became slurred: “They thought I’d had a stroke.” Kristin’s story is all too common with adverse effects following the HPV vaccines now well over 80,000 according to the World Health Organisation’s database.

Interpretation of the study

We can infer that auto-antibody concentration paralleled symptoms suffered by girls who became sick by Gardasil. That is, antibodies elicited by the first dose caused symptoms in a few girls; while greater antibody concentrations with a second dose would cause a greater number of them to fall sick. Although we have no lab evidence of antibodies changing in this fashion we don’t need it, since it’s a very well-established scientific fact that serum antibody titres change with vaccine doses

Clinical evidence

In the study it was found that when the girls were re-exposed to vaccine antigens the auto-antibodies rose and relapse occurred. When the auto-antibodies were removed then there was clinical improvement. Partial remission has been achieved with antibody removal therapies such as IVIg ( a solution of human plasma proteins and plasmapheresis (a process that filters the blood and removes harmful antibodies).

Valentina’s story



After two doses of Gardasil, Valentina developed flaccid paralysis in at least five muscle groups in her body. The young Colombian woman could not breathe and was intubated and ventilated and given plasmapheresis ridding her blood of the autoantibodies that had caused her paralysis.



This procedure is used for treating many autoimmune diseases which are increasing rapidly. It is not a treatment that is undertaken lightly with risks of complications as well as costing thousands of dollars. This is why there has to be more independent research such as what has been elicited by Martinez in Colombia. It is vital that the public understand the risks of these vaccines that are being given to teenagers all over the world.

How can we let this happen? All over the world girls and boys are becoming very ill after being vaccinated against HPV said to causing cervical cancer. But there is no scientific proof that the vaccine has ever prevented a single case of the cancer. Cervical cancer is well detected by Pap smear programs. There is no need for these harmful vaccines.

Is this intentionally causing infertility in boys and girls?


What if you had known? was the title of a recent talk given by Dr Sherri Tenpenny at a public debate on HPV vaccines organised by Courtenay Heading of Jurby Wellness, a multi national open Science collaboration-passionate about wellness.


To date, I have logged well over 20,000 hours of personal time researching to expose this 200-year mistake. I have collected more than 5,000 mainstream articles into my subscription website, the Vaccine Research Library. These articles, and more, lay bare the travesty, greed, conflicts of interest and sordid politics behind vaccination.

I look forward the day when parents stop poisoning their children because they blindly follow the advice of an under-informed “authority figure” in a white coat. The day is approaching, through the efforts of many, when adults will be more fearful of what is coming through that needle and the potential consequences of a life time of poor health and medical travesties than they are of a fever, a rash, a cough and diarrhea — the core symptoms of childhood diseases. – Sherri Tenpenny


Sherri Tenpenny begins her powerful presentation on Gardasil and Gardasil 9
Probably one of the most unnecessary, most toxic, most destructive vaccines they have come up with yet.

She calls for a change of language in regard to vaccines stating that we need to use the word infection rather than disease. The difference is that infections come and go whereas diseases come from vaccines.

Vaccines are not safe and effective.

The American osteopathic physician and anti-vaccination activist reminds us of the flawed nature of vaccines when she states that if someone develops antibodies after a vaccination the vaccine is called effective when in reality these antibodies are ‘a marker of contamination’.

Gardasil and Gardasil 9

There are greater than 150 serotypes of the human papilloma virus (HPV) that are supposed to cause cervical cancer. However as Tenpenny states:

I think there is an association not causality. HPV infections come and go…like the common cold

For in fact 98% of HPV infections resolve within 2 years. There is some US data which shows that only 3.45% of women tested positive for the 4 HPV strains that became part of the Gardasil vaccine and only 2% tested positive to HPV 16 and 18.

Tenpenny asks:

Why did we develop a vaccine for these strains when women didn’t have these anyway.

We are reminded that the CIN classification does not determine how much cancer is present in the cervical cells but is a marker for how much infection and inflammation there is in the cells. It can depict the potential for the cells to become cancerous. When there is cancer, viruses such as HPV adhere to these tissues but this doesn’t mean that the viruses caused the cancer.

The virus is blamed so we can have a vaccine and this is what happened.

Why do some HPV infections fail to resolve?
Most people have an HPV infection at some stage in their lives but these are usually resolved within two years. However in a small minority of cases these infections do not spontaneously resolve.

Tenpenny listed the risks factors that prevent the resolution of the HPV virus in some women.

Smoking; parity or number of births; number of sexual partners; the continued use of oral contraceptives and poor nutrition.

VLP’s or virus-like particles
As I have pointed out in my book Gardasil:Fast-Tracked and Flawed and reiterated by Sherri Tenpenny, Gardasil vaccines do not even contain the HPV virus.

Developing the vaccine was not straightforward for “HPV proved impossible to grow in the lab”. “Most viruses can be grown in the lab because the cell lines that are grown are ‘permissive’, which means that when a virus gets inside, all the machinery necessary for that cell to make lots of copies of the virus is present,” explains Madonna King, author of Ian Frazer: The Man Who Saved a Million Lives. Undaunted by the challenge, Ian Frazer and the late Jian Zhou, an expert in gene technology, ‘reasoned’ that “If HPV couldn’t be grown … then perhaps they could build their own version of the virus”

So what we have in HPV vaccines is not a real virus but virus-like particles. Seriously what are we really doing injecting these particles into the bodies of teenagers all over the world?

According to investigative journalist and author Janine Roberts:

… these vaccines are the product of a new synthetic vaccine industry based, not on isolating viruses, but on reproducing short lengths of genetic codes postulated to come from proteins that once formed the outer coat of the virus.

Dr Tenpenny’s presentation discusses the toxic contents of Gardasil and Gardasil 9 which include the potent adjuvant amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulphate, (AAHS), polysorbate 80 and sodium borate as well as the antigens – the virus-like particles.

Rise in infertility
Polysorbate 80 is known to cause infertility on female mice. In the research for my book Gardasil: Fast-Tracked and Flawed I discovered that although mainstream media remains silent about the problems emanating from this vaccination program, some doctors are reporting the adverse effects on young women’s health.

In the BMJ (British Medical Journal) Case Reports authors Deidre Little and Harvey Rodrick Grenville Ward of Australia reported the case of a patient with amenorrhoea who noticed that her usual regular menstrual cycle had changed, becoming irregular and then scant after Gardasil.

The authors explain that it is very rare for the condition known as premature ovarian failure to occur at such an early age and that the annual incidence is 10 per 100,000 between 15 and 29 years of age. Premature ovarian failure is a serious health event for young girls and one that adversely affects their ability to have children.

Dr Little has continued her research into HPV vaccines after having several more patients report to her with what is now called premature ovarian insufficiency. These young women report having infrequent periods which continue to dwindle and finally cease.

Deidre Little is a general practitioner who has reported on seven patients with POF who told her their symptoms came on after their Gardasil vaccination. If there are seven reports from her small town of Bellingen, NSW then we can expect that there are many other girls suffering the same unnecessary, but serious and life-changing condition after their Gardasil shots.

Sodium Borate

Is rat poison. Banned in food but the vaccine industry is allowed to include it in vaccines that are injected into our children.

Aluminium adjuvants

Sherri Tenpenny points to a 1995 animal study which found that aluminium adjuvants lead to low sperm counts and therefore to infertility. The addition of these seriously harmful additives, polysorbate 80, sodium borate and aluminium makes her wonder:

Is this intentionally causing infertility in boys… and girls

This is a powerful presentation by Sherri Tenpenny. My thanks to Courtenay Heading for holding this important seminar.

The Gardasil Vaccine—Bad Science, Great Promotion, Dangerous
9 May, 2018

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rjeCNLw2cX0

[Delight]

HPV vaccination does not negatively impact fertility in adolescents, large study finds
Date:
August 21, 2018
Source:
Kaiser Permanente
Summary:
Adolescents who receive recommended vaccinations, including for human papillomavirus, have no increased risk of primary ovarian insufficiency, also known as premature menopause, according to a Kaiser Permanente study published today in Pediatrics.

A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection
Gayle DeLong
Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health,
Received 05 Aug 2017, Accepted 14 May 2018
Current Issues
Published online: 11 Jun 2018
Download citation https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2018.1477640

ABSTRACT
Birth rates in the United States have recently fallen. Birth rates per 1000 females aged 25–29 fell from 118 in 2007 to 105 in 2015. One factor may involve the vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV). Shortly after the vaccine was licensed, several reports of recipients experiencing primary ovarian failure emerged. This study analyzed information gathered in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which represented 8 million 25-to-29-year-old women residing in the United States between 2007 and 2014. Approximately 60% of women who did not receive the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived. For married women, 75% who did not receive the shot were found to conceive, while only 50% who received the vaccine had ever been pregnant. Using logistic regression to analyze the data, the probability of having been pregnant was estimated for females who received an HPV vaccine compared with females who did not receive the shot. Results suggest that females who received the HPV shot were less likely to have ever been pregnant than women in the same age group who did not receive the shot. If 100% of females in this study had received the HPV vaccine, data suggest the number of women having ever conceived would have fallen by 2 million. Further study into the influence of HPV vaccine on fertility is thus warranted.

2015 vaccine debate when Hawaii was considering eliminating exemptions

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NHPeZ08BW6M

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane
Co-authors and Hosts of the “Hollywood Spin” Series of
Commentaries on RevolutionTelevision.net.
U.S. BIODEFENSE CHIEF AND HAWAII SENATOR CHARGED WITH CONSUMER FRAUD IN PBS VACCINE DEBATE ON “MANDATORY INJECTIONS” FOR ALL “HEALTHY CHILDREN”



Honolulu, HI. (Feb. 20, 2015)– PBS Hawaii confused and frightened viewers with a live program debating whether all healthy children must be vaccinated or otherwise quarantined if any outbreak occurs. The INSIGHTS ON PBS HAWAII show featured four of the nations leading analysts, two pro, and two con, who debated the controversial matter most candidly.

America’s bio-defense chief, Sarah Park, and Senator Josh Green, Hawaii’s Health Committee chairman, got slammed for consumer fraud and conflicting interests in the genetically-modified vaccine industry; concealing, among other things, Monsanto and parent-company network sponsor Pfizer—a repeat offender fined the largest criminal damage award for fraud in U.S. history.

Vetting the “con,” and the widespread crime, leading anti-vaccinationists, Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Dr. Janet Edghill, disclaimed the program as part of a national campaign to deceive parents into vaccinating children by smearing better-informed resistors, marginalizing them as “crazy” for rejecting the “intoxicating injections” and expressing legitimate religious, philosophical, and medical concerns.

Park and Horowitz on PBSINSIGHTS ON PBS HAWAII is a live public affairs show that is also streamed on PBSHawaii.org. The producers and host, however, failed to mention their conflicting sponsorship from Merck, Pfizer, and other vaccine makers,when they promoted the show that stunned viewers, and convinced most critics that vaccination resistors are better informed and certainly more candid for examining the “risk/benefit” science grossly and “criminally neglected” by doctors and pharmacists who are heavily invested in the “intoxicating paradigm” controlled by untrustworthy drug companies.

THE UNNERVING CON
Measles outbreaks allegedly linked to “non-vaccinated children” on the mainland have “many in Hawaii questioning whether our vaccination requirements are strong enough to prevent an outbreak here,” the show’s advertisement read. “Although several vaccinations are required to attend public schools, parents who believe the shots are dangerous or unnecessary can seek exemptions for religious and medical reasons. But now that the nearly eradicated measles virus has returned, should exemptions for healthy children still be allowed?”

That “PBS con” framed the program with vaccine-industry-bias, only recognized by people privy to the tricks of “media persuasion,” as you will learn more as your continue reading. . . .

This article reviews the PBS “program,” pointing out omissions, misrepresentations, diversions, and downright fraud committed on behalf of the network’s concealed “underwriters.”

Dr. Leonard Horowitz is a Harvard-trained filmmaker, public health expert, media intelligence analyst, and award-winning author of seventeen books, including the American best-seller Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? that is credited by health officials internationally as largely responsible for the anti-vaccination movement globally.

Complementing the opposition, Dr. Janet Edghill is a leading vaccine injury researcher and parents-rights activist who spent 28 years as an electrical engineer for the Department of Defense, held positions with the Department of the Navy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the US Pacific Command, before earning three Master’s Degrees. Initially a vaccine-proponent, she witnessed her youngest son, Ryan, becoming severely autistic following a vaccine that redirected her life. “Janet” was forced to pursue a new career into special education for vaccine injured children. She went on to earn her doctorate in this field from the University of Southern California. Since then she has served several non-profit organizations in Hawaii, promoting rights for the disabled, and publishing information to help children with autism on AutismInParadise.com.

malia mattoch2PBS host Malia Mattoch moderated the feud. She began, “While there are currently no measles cases in Hawaii, outbreaks connected to Illinois daycare centers and Disneyland have brought the debate to the forefront. . . . Should Hawaii require vaccinations for all healthy children?”

For the next hour, Horowitz and Edghill pummeled medical doctors Green and Park for their willful blindness to vaccination risk studies, and the “intoxicating paradigm’s propaganda,” despite Mattoch giving Park more than her fair share of time.

PBS’s motivation for heralding the program, “Should Hawaii Require All Children to Be Vaccinated?” is not hard to glean. Their influential sponsors seeks to express their bias by abusing the liberal-leaning “public broadcasting” platform to protect and promote their petrochemical-pharmaceutical interests.

“It’s a cartel,” Dr. Horowitz commented to his partnering journalist, Sherri Kane, after the show. “The mob’s murderous history stretches from Nazi infamy with the IG Farben-Rockefeller Standard Oil Company partnership that directed the holocaust of World War II, and repeatedly experimented on humans, to the more recent environmental and public health disasters profiting special interests that are PBS’s leading sponsors.”

DR. PARK’S PROPAGANDA

Rather than vaccine toxicity popping the question, “When will drug companies stop damaging people and the environment?” the show focused on measles and the question, “Are un-vaccinated children putting vaccinated children at risk?”

Mattoch directed the majority of questions to Park, appointed in 2012 to chair the “National Biodefense Science Board” charged with assessing risks and recommending drug and vaccine stockpiling by the federal government. Alternatively, their propaganda claims to be helping to “prevent, prepare for, and respond to public health emergencies” stemming from bioterrorism and infectious diseases.

“I think, ahmm, they pose quite a significant risk,” Park replied to Mattoch’s question to begin demonizing parents of un-vaccinated children. Her transparent effort to cause people to fear vaccine resistors disturbed many viewers.

“[Un-vaccinated children are a risk], ahmm; not only to themselves, but to the community. Hence, ahmm, you know, should they be opting out of vaccination, we, we, . . . will take the measures to protect them, and those around them, by asking them to excuse themselves from school, ahmm, and from the community in general, during the incubation phase if they’ve been exposed.”

In other words, still reeling from the federal embarrassment over the abysmal bio-response to the recent “Ebola crisis,” or similarly embarrassing inefficacy of the 2014 “flu vaccine,” Park pushed fears and threats to promote quarantining people during pronounced outbreaks, regardless of the different risks that different diseases pose to different people in different parts of the world.

Sandra Park2“Ahmm,” Park continued to defend the drug cartel’s increasing preference for quarantines. “That’s so we can monitor them. They can, you know; and make certain [children] get the perfect care; but also to protect other kids who would be, you know, potentially in danger from, ahhh, getting the [measles] disease. So they [that is, unvaccinated children] pose quite a significant risk.”

THE “SIGNIFICANT RISK”
“The most ‘significant risk’ is to Americans’ ‘life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness’ after vaccine intoxication whack your immune system, health, children, family, and finances, as they did in Dr. Edghill’s case,” Dr. Horowitz commented to Kane after the show.

“Vaccine science is like a new religion,” Kane replied. (Sherri Kane is a journalist, psycho-social analyst, and women, children’s and animal rights activist who works with Dr. Horowitz analyzing media propaganda on their Revolution Television Network, and generating “medicinal music” on 528Records.com and the 528 Radio Network.)

“Most governments and religions use fear to control ‘We The Sheeple.’ Kane continued. ” The media is used to get the ‘herd’ to follow corporate fascist agendas—generating a virtual hypnotic trance state in which alternative views are shunned and ‘radicalizers’ are persecuted. This is how the drug cartel manages populations for profit. And now they are aiming to control your most valuable and sacred personal property—your body, forced into quarantines or injected with God knows what.”

Park’s propaganda was transparently Orwellian. Precisely like Kane’s diagnosis. Dr. Park never answered host Mattoch’s question, but skirted the risk-differential issue without providing any scientific evidence whatsoever.

“There are no studies that have ever been done comparing risks between unvaccinated versus vaccinated children, putting either at more or less risk,” Dr. Horowitz said after the show, applauding Dr. Edghill’s comments (as detailed below). “The main reason is that officials under the influence of Big Pharma’s bribes and academic indoctrination neglect and conceal data on injuries that would condemn the vaccine industry irreparably. So the definitive proof, for either side, doesn’t exist; thanks to the special interest groups neglecting the studies and concealing the evidence. This is why Dr. Park can’t argue, but simply diverts from this point. She too is a victim of medical-scientific evidence tampering; and her ‘paradigm’ is, therefore, fundamentally flawed and untrustworthy.”

Nonetheless, that dearth of data didn’t stop Park’s doublespeak setting the standard for the Green-Park team.

“But, I might also add,” Park rambled, “the risk now is not just from unvaccinated children, but unvaccinated adults, because a number of kids have now grown up. And we are now seeing a sort of changing epidemiology in that we are seeing unvaccinated kids being affected; we’re now seeing the unvaccinated adults, the kids that grew up, and now bringing the diseases back home to Hawaii, and spreading it in our communities. Ahmm.”

What did she say? “Unvaccinated adults . . . now bringing the diseases back home to Hawaii,” after Mattoch opened the show admitting that no cases of measles have been reported in Hawaii. (Beam us up Scotty, there are no longer intelligent life forms on this planet.)

Park’s propaganda would be laughable, if it wasn’t so severely serious and unsettling. Other than spreading fear for the sake of vaccine sales, and boosting consumer confidence that has been eroded by the abysmal public health failures in 2014, the bio-defense chair’s assertions just don’t make sense without considering the media agenda–to spin the “Disneyland Measles Outbreak” to socially engineer families to feud over compliance with childhood vaccination “requirements,” and at the same time advertise old and new, supposedly ‘improved,’ vaccines.

The disparity is as large as Bill Gates’s infamous admission at a recent Ted Conference. There the world’s leading vaccine supplier lectured on his mission with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. “Television is a good thing,” Gates said, and “vaccines are expected to reduce the world’s population by 15 percent,” so that survivors can all keep watching television.

“Many of these diseases are actually worse, getting them as an adult,” Park continued frightening viewers. “So the fear is, you know, for them, as well, you know; the worry is that, we’ll see, we’ll start to see some complications that are going to occur, are more likely to occur, in adults. That certainly those over 20, are more likely to have, ahh, complications from measles, ahh, virus, than, than, say those between 5 and 20.”

PARK’S APPALLING PRESENTATION OF PROPAGANDA AND “COMPLICATIONS”

“Park’s propaganda is appalling,” Dr. Horowitz commented after the show. “Park demonstrated gross negligence by omitting the fact that vaccines’ purported ‘protection’ wears off after several years. So that, let’s say you get your baby injected with hepatitis B vaccine as officials recommend; it wears off by the time your teenager finishes high school. That’s what many studies are proving.”

For instance, one study published in the Journal of Hepatology in 2007, showed that cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and even ethnicity, terminated the protection allegedly provided initially by intoxicating vaccinations.

Park continued to explain that “complications” could arise from children not getting vaccinated, but incredibly the example she provided was from her clinical practice treating a terminally ill child who HAD BEEN VACCINATED with the measles vaccines, and later developed “complications” from adult-onset measles.

“What percentage of people have vaccine injuries; which don’t always occur [immediately, but over the long term]?” replied Dr. Edghill, challenging Park’s propaganda.

“I agree completely,” concurred Dr. Horowitz. “The number one issue that’s been completely neglected, grossly neglected, and it’s a violation of the public’s faith and trust in the public health department, is the fact that there is no definitive risk/benefit analysis done.

“The cornerstone of public health is to make sure that we’re not killing and maiming more people than we’re helping and saving. The fact is,” the doctor surmised from researching history and the dangers and damages done in the name of “health science,” “without definitive data on knowing how many people are being injured, essentially what you are doing is propagandizing what amounts to the mass killing of people, or maiming of people, for profit for the pharmaceutical industrialists.”

THE POLIO ERADICATION DECEPTION

Senator Green responded very defensively to Horowitz’s medical blasphemy.

“Before vaccinations, polio caused paralysis in vast segments of society and killed people. Before vaccinations, smallpox devastated societies killing millions of people. Before flu vaccinations, we had global pandemics. . . . We could be wiped out if we didn’t have some capacity to immunize ourselves. This has been the greatest public health success that we’ve seen. . . .”

polio
Dr. Edghill rebutted Dr. Green’s statement saying, “The polio vaccine was initially, just ahh [carcinogenic and deadly], there was so much faith placed in it. . . . It was contaminated with simian virus 40, . . . the 40th monkey virus . . .”

“And that’s a hideous story,” Dr. Horowitz interjected. “The reality is, what the Senator just said is really incomplete. And, again, omissions and misrepresentations in law is fraud. So essentially, to say that the polio vaccine caused the disappearance of polio, you have to forget first Salk, and Salk’s vaccines were hideously contaminated with SV40 which caused horrific cancer pandemics. The reality is that the Salk vaccine, replaced by the Sabin vaccine that was not much better because it was still live attenuated virus, and the killed Salk vaccine was never fully killed, because of the SV40—the 40th monkey virus ever discovered [that caused cancer in virtually every animal it was injected into.]

Dr. Horowitz continued: “Two brilliant women [Bernice Eddy and Sarah Stewart] went to the National Institutes of Health Director, Smidell, and said to him . . . ‘We’ve tested the Merck Pharmaceutical [Co.] polio vaccine off the shelf, [and] if you continue to allow these vaccines to go out, I guarantee you over the next twenty-years you will have epidemics of cancer unlike the world has ever seen. That woman [issuing the warning] was Bernice Eddy. And [the virus] was initially called SE [short for Sewart-Eddy] Polyoma Virus; and essentially it took her ten years before she got to the United States Congress, and in an appeal—because she had been demoted, defunded, and ostracized, persecuted; and [then] SE Polyoma was stolen, and renamed. Dr. Hilleman at Merck renamed it the SV 40 virus. Basically, it [the theft of intellectual property] was sexist, it was outrageous, and it was a complete cover-up of what the true reality is with regard to the original polio vaccines.”

“SV40 is today still being isolated in tumors—in cancerous tumors,” Dr. Edghill responded. “There has also been demonstration of vertical transmission between parent to child.”

“That’s right,” Horowitz concurred. “It’s hideous.”continued here

[Patient]

Posted by Constance (here)

Posted by Patient (here)

Posted by Constance (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
Unvaccinated Population Called Upon to Participate in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Legal Study

This is a fantastic step in the right direction. I would love to see comparative studies of all the unvaccinated vs vaccinated children for every country; i.e worldwide.

Yes, but people are already in hiding. If you have been successful in protecting your children from vaccinations, it is scary to consider participating in such a study.

I don't want to say anymore because I do not want to discourage people from speaking out against vaccines.

I know first hand how vaccinated vs unvaccinated children are.

And I know how your family is treated as a result of not vaccinating your kids.

I hope the parents of the unvaccinated kids respond to this study and that this study is only used for the purpose in which they claim it is.

I hear you feelingly Patient.

Like yourself, I am acutely aware of what can happen as a result of parents not vaccinating their kids. I have so many of my own personal stories to share and it has gone a long way into understanding the pressure, the propaganda, the mind-set, the deceptions and the ignorance that prevails. It is an absolute travesty that as a parent, I have to fight an insane system that wants to take away my right as a human being to be able to choose what I put into my childs body.

And just like yourself, I also know first-hand how vaccinated vs unvaccinated children are.

I've got friends and family in Australia who have unvaccinated children. The differences between the health of those vaccinated and the health of those unvaccinated is like night and day. My son experiences such incredibly good physical health that when other parents or grandparents share about their own vaccinated children being sick, I have to stay silent because I don't have anything to share!

Parents like ourselves and others that you speak of that have done the research and know what's going on - we have no choice but to fight for our children and other kids whose parents might not yet have the whole picture. I have been lucky and have had some parents thank me for opening their eyes and pointing them to research. Urging them to look for themselves to make an educated choice. I feel really bad for those people that trust the system and then end up with tragedy in their lives.

I have kids on both sides - I have younger kids that I have to explain to why their older siblings are autistic. I was vaccinated myself way before they changed the vaccinations to what they have become. After working with my family doctor, he changed his practice and would no longer provide vaccinations to his patients.

Like yourself, my younger children rarely even get a flu bug during flu season. And I am lucky to have high functioning autistic children.

You are also right when you speak of having so many stories that you could share. The impact goes further than what is obvious on the surface and as a parent you are always fighting for your kids. And having to pick and choose when to stay silent is hard because you can not always voice your concerns - and that can be harder than speaking out.

I can see what other people are saying here as well. The fear that some people face to vaccinate their kids can be overwhelming as the system has done a good job keeping them in fear.

I am so grateful to all of those people who fight for the rights of the children. More grateful than I could put into words.

[onawah]

Dr. Andrew Wakefield -from 12/27/18, but worth watching again
The HighWire with Del Bigtree

"HighWire re-airs it’s most important interview to date. Shocking new information, & candid admissions, reveal the real fraud in the case of Andrew Wakefield."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PLjqIL7sdus

[onawah]

Censorship Is the Last Tool of Tyrants
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 28, 2019
(too many live links to embed here--see the article at)
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a..._rid=625937582

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=f3nB4fGljTY

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In 2015, Pfizer’s Prevnar 13 vaccine (which protects against common strains of pneumonia) made more money than either Lipitor or Viagra, two of Pfizer’s top-selling drugs, thanks to the U.S. government recommendation to start using it in seniors over 65
There’s a rapidly progressing effort to vilify and even criminalize those who express concerns about vaccine safety, and to shut down free speech in the U.S. (but only speech relating to vaccine harms, not the alleged benefits of vaccines)
Increasingly tyrannical measures are also being employed, including forcing people to get vaccinated against measles or face significant fines or jail time
Washington state will no longer accept a philosophical exemption from the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine for children seeking to attend daycare or school
Instagram is now blocking vaccine-related hashtags such as #vaccinescauseautism, and any hashtag found to be “spreading misinformation” will be added to an ever-growing list of banned hashtags

The following referenced information contains opinion and perspective on a health topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics that is being discussed in public forums, including in medical, law and other professional journals; newspapers, magazines and other print; broadcast and online media outlets; state legislatures and the U.S. Congress.

Readers are encouraged to go to the websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for the perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking, including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for information on vaccine policymaking; to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for information on regulating vaccines for safety and effectiveness; and to National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for information on research and the development of new vaccines.

The World Health Organization has stated that “vaccine hesitancy” is one of the top 10 global public health threats.

Is the vaccine business a profitable industry? You bet!1 Many vaccine pushers like to promote the idea that vaccine profits are slim, hence there's no financial incentive behind the push for vaccinations. Two years ago, the blog Skeptical Raptor, just to point to one example, stated that " … [T]he Big Pharma vaccine profits conspiracy is still one of most amusing myths of the antivaccination world."2

In reality, Pfizer's Prevnar 133 vaccine (which protects against common strains of pneumonia) actually made more money than Lipitor or Viagra in 2015, both Pfizer top-selling drugs,4,5 and the 2018 revenues for Gardasil 9 was $3 billion according to CNBC.6

As noted by Financial Times,7 profits from Prevnar 13 shot up in 2015, reaching $6.25 billion, nearly three times more than Viagra that year, thanks to the U.S. government recommendation to start using it in seniors over 65 and not just children. "The success of Prevnar shows [vaccines] can be as lucrative as any drug," the article states.8

Censorship Aimed at Blocking First-Hand Testimony of Vaccine Harms
When you have a profitable business, you want to nurture and protect it, and promote its sustained growth. That's normal in the world of business. What's not normal is enlisting government to mandate the use of your product while simultaneously preventing the sharing of bad reviews that might impact sales and/or force you to improve the safety or effectiveness of your product.

And that's exactly what's happening in the vaccine industry. In recent months, the push to censor negative press about vaccines has been outright shocking. The "justification" given is that "misinformation" about vaccines is preventing people from making sound medical decisions.

But make no mistake about it; what's really happening here is that Big Pharma and government are blocking parents of vaccine-injured children from sharing their stories and letting the truth be known that there are risks involved. It's really a showdown between a largely pharma-run government and parents of vaccine injured children — not government against creators of fake news.

There's nothing fake about vaccine injuries. There's also nothing fake about data, oftentimes obtained from government documents, that are unfavorable for the vaccine manufacturers. The current censorship is blocking out those real-world stores of injury, and important data demonstrating that government and industry are not telling the whole truth about what is known about vaccines.

‘Vaccine Doubts Spread Like Disease’
Speaking at a recent event at the World Health Organization’s annual assembly, Seth Berkley, CEO of the Global vaccine alliance GAVI, stated that doubts about vaccines spread across social media “at the speed of light,” and that the spread of “misinformation about vaccines,” is “not a freedom of speech issue,” and that “social media firms need to take it offline” because “it kills people.”9

He also stated there’s “a strong scientific consensus about the safety of vaccines,” referring to the spread of negative vaccine information as “a disease.” It’s well worth remembering that GAVIs primary mission is to “shape markets for vaccines and other immunization products.” Clearly that will not be as easy if people understand the risks.

The WHO and U.S. government are founding partners of GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance. In 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided $750 million in seed money to spearhead the creation of GAVI, a public-private partnership and multilateral funding mechanism involving the WHO, governments, the vaccine industry, the World Bank, philanthropic foundations and civil society groups to “improve access to new and underused vaccines for children living in the world’s poorest countries.”10

Since 2000, GAVI has raised more than $15 billion to vaccinate the world’s children. The single biggest funding source for GAVI is the Gates Foundation, which has donated more than $3 billion, or 20 percent of GAVI’s total income.11

Between 2000 and 2013, only about 10 percent of total funding provided by GAVI ($862 million) was used to actually strengthen health systems in developing countries, such as improving sanitation and nutrition, while nearly 80 percent was used to purchase, deliver and promote vaccines.12

Shutting Down Vaccine Safety Discussion and Censoring Vaccine Harms
Several of my recent articles have discussed the rapidly progressing effort to vilify (if not outright criminalize) those who express concerns about vaccine safety and to shut down free speech about vaccine harms in the U.S., along with increasingly tyrannical measures, forcing people to get vaccinated or face significant fines or jail time. Here's a summary of some of the most prominent examples:

The World Health Organization lists "vaccine hesitancy" as one of the top 10 global public health threats for 2019.13

In a January interview with CBS News,14 Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) did not tell the truth when he flat-out denied the fact that vaccines can cause injury or death.

The fact is, the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 has paid out $4 billion in awards for vaccine damages and deaths, and that's just 31 percent of all the injury petitions filed.15,16

February 27, 2019, Fauci also did not tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth to the U.S. House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations at its "Confronting a Growing Public Health Threat: Measles Outbreaks in the U.S." hearing.17

In his sworn testimony, he claimed childhood vaccines like the MMR are completely safe and do not cause encephalitis (brain inflammation) before the parents in the audience audibly protested and he was prodded into quickly adding the word "rare."18 The facts are:

a. The MMR vaccine package insert19 published by Merck states that "Encephalitis and encephalopathy have been reported approximately once for every 3 million doses of M-M-R II or measles-mumps- and rubella-containing vaccine."

b. The vaccine information statement (VIS), which doctors by federal law (under the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act) are required to give parents before their children receive a CDC recommended vaccine, states that "severe" adverse effects of the MMR20 and MMRV21 vaccines include "deafness; long-term seizures; coma; lowered consciousness; and brain damage." One of the "moderate" adverse events listed as associated with the MMRV vaccine is encephalitis.

c. Studies have shown the MMR vaccine can cause encephalitis and encephalopathy (acute or chronic brain dysfunction).22

d. As noted in a 2015 paper in the journal Vaccine:23

"We summarize epidemiologic data on deaths following vaccination, including examples where reasonable scientific evidence exists to support that vaccination caused or contributed to deaths.

Rare cases where a known or plausible theoretical risk of death following vaccination exists include anaphylaxis, vaccine-strain systemic infection after administration of live vaccines to severely immunocompromised persons, intussusception after rotavirus vaccine, Guillain-Barré syndrome after inactivated influenza vaccine, fall-related injuries associated with syncope after vaccination, yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease or associated neurologic disease, serious complications from smallpox vaccine including eczema vaccinatum, progressive vaccinia, postvaccinal encephalitis, myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy and vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis from oral poliovirus vaccine."

Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, also misinformed Congress when she stated, "There are rare instances in children with certain very specific underlying problems with their immune system in whom the vaccine is contraindicated."

She lied when she said the MMR vaccine "does not cause brain swelling and encephalitis" in healthy children, and that parents would know if their child was at risk beforehand, because their child's doctor would tell them if this were the case.24

In February 2019, FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb threatened state legislators with federal government intervention if they do not eliminate vaccine exemptions.25,26,27

California state Sen. Dr. Richard Pan, D-Sacramento, is urging the U.S. Surgeon General to push mandatory vaccinations to the top of the federal public health agenda.28,29 According to Pan, mandating vaccines, as was done for smallpox during the Revolutionary War, would "protect our right as Americans to be free of preventable diseases."

In March 2019, a bill was introduced in Washington, D.C., allowing minor children of any age to get vaccines in the city without a parent's knowledge or consent after a doctor says the child is "mature" enough to make the decision.30

March 27, 2019, Rockland County, New York, barred any infant, child or teen under the age of 18 who is not vaccinated against measles from entering "public places" until the state of emergency is lifted in 30 days or until they get an MMR shot. (A New York Supreme Court judge lifted the state of emergency April 5, saying the number of measles cases did not meet the legal requirement for an emergency order.)

April 9, 2019, health officials ordered residents in four Williamsburg, New York, zip codes — 11205, 11206, 11211, 11249 — to get vaccinated for measles within 48 hours or face a $1,000 fine or six months in jail.

April 25, 2019, Rockland county issued another emergency order that banned anyone with measles or who has come in contact with a measles case from appearing in public for up to 21 days or face a $2,000 per day fine.

"The new order would keep unvaccinated students who don't have medical or religious exemptions in the most affected areas from going to school, and those who have measles or have been exposed to it and are not vaccinated from going to public places, both indoor and outdoor," CBS2 New York reported.31

May 12, 2019, KUTV reported Washington state will no longer accept a philosophical exemption from the MMR vaccine for children seeking to attend daycare or school.32

Tech Platforms Embrace Position as Truth Adjudicators

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9DL2HNzjzMc

In recent months, media have also been flooded with reports of how tech platforms and social media are fueling "anti-vax" fears and spreading misinformation, and not doing everything possible to prevent sharing of vaccine safety-related material between users.33

Art Caplan, a bioethics professor and head of the division of medical ethics at New York University School of Medicine, has stated that "companies cannot allow themselves to be 'vehicles for misinformation contagion,'" and must take steps to censor information that might lead people to avoid vaccination.34 In response:

YouTube has demonetized "anti-vaccine" channels, barring them from advertising on the platform.35

Facebook is "hiding" vaccine critical content and barring "ads that contain misinformation about vaccines."36

Pinterest is blocking search terms related to vaccines, as well as "memes and pins from sites promoting anti-vaccine propaganda."37

Amazon has removed films critical of vaccine safety from its Prime Video streaming service, including the award winning 2011 documentary "The Greater Good,"38,39 as well as books discussing vaccine risks and failures and/or biomedical and holistic health treatments for autism.40

Google is burying content and videos relating to vaccine safety issues.41

Instagram is blocking vaccine-related hashtags such as #vaccinescauseautism and any hashtag found to be "spreading misinformation" will be added to an ever-growing list of banned hashtags.42,43

Twitter Joins in Censoring Vaccine Material
To this ever-growing list we can now add Twitter, which on May 10, 2019, announced44 users searching for vaccine-related Tweets will immediately be directed to "a credible public health resource," namely the vaccines.gov website, which is run by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

"Noncredible commentary and information about vaccines" will not be included in auto-suggested queries. Twitter is also planning on expanding this censorship tool to include "other important public health issues …"

And that's the crux of the problem, isn't it? Let's face it, the censorship will not be restricted to vaccine information. There are many toxic but profoundly profitable industries out there, and before you know it, we won't be allowed to read about any number of toxic and dangerous issues.

Can You Get Full Disclosure on Vaccines From a Single Source?
Even if, right now, you think it "might be a good idea" to restrict information about the risks and failures of vaccines, it won't be long before the censorship train stops at your station and suppresses information you are interested in and need to know about to take control of your health. Censorship, which is a threat to freedom of thought, speech and conscience, is always a slippery slope.

If the vaccine thought police prevail today, tomorrow you easily could be prevented from reading or sharing information about another health topic near and dear to your heart — be it pollution, climate change, water fluoridation, toxic cosmetics, dangerous infant products, pesticide-contaminated and GMO-altered food or any number of other contentious issues that can impact an industry's bottom line.

Once censorship takes root as an acceptable norm, there will be no end to it. The fact of the matter is, the federal government's vaccines.gov website does not spell out the whole truth about what is known, scientifically, about vaccines. For example, in a May 16, 2019 post, The Highwire points out the fallacies proclaimed on vaccines.gov with regard to aluminum adjuvants in vaccines,45 and that's just one example of many.

According to the vaccines.gov website, aluminum in vaccines is safe, stating that "For decades, vaccines that include aluminum have been tested for safety — these studies have shown that using aluminum is safe."

In reality, aluminum has been used in vaccines for decades without any safety testing having been done. It has simply been assumed that aluminum was safe, because the addition of aluminum to vaccines provokes a stronger inflammatory response in an effort to create longer lasting artificial immunity.

However, as noted in a 2011 paper in Current Medicinal Chemistry, titled "Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are They Safe?":46

"Experimental research … clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences."

Or how about this 2018 study,47 which found high amounts of aluminum in the brains of autistic patients. According to the authors:

"The aluminium content of brain tissue in autism was consistently high. The mean (standard deviation) aluminium content across all 5 individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and 3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively.

These are some of the highest values for aluminium in human brain tissue yet recorded and one has to question why, for example, the aluminium content of the occipital lobe of a 15 year old boy would be 8.74 (11.59) μg/g dry wt.?"

This study goes on to note that one known source of aluminum that children would be exposed to is vaccines, and that "their burgeoning use has been directly correlated with increasing prevalence of ASD."

Science Earmarked as False News — Who Are the Science Deniers Now?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GmFX-iQA2nA

Another example of what the government's vaccines.gov website isn't telling you is the documented evidence48 that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been sitting on since 1978, showing the MMR vaccine causes gastrointestinal problems and upper respiratory infection in roughly HALF of all children.

This 1978 MMR vaccine's licensing data were recently obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests filed by the Informed Consent Action Network.49 These documents raise several other safety questions as well. For example, they show that:

The MMR vaccine was licensed for use in all children based on clinical trials involving a total of 834 children, of which only 342 received the MMR vaccine
Adverse events were only tracked for 42 days following injection
All of the control groups in the eight trials upon which licensing was granted were given another vaccine, in some cases simply another batch or lot of the MMR. None received a real placebo (an inert substance), without which you cannot accurately judge safety, as both the treatment group and the controls will experience side effects. The only thing these studies can tell us is which of two vaccines is better or worse, in terms of short-term side effects
We're Entering an Era of Faith-Based Science
Does the vaccine.gov website tell you this about the MMR? No, it does not. Instead, this very real news, based on official documents from the FDA showing the actual science underpinning the licensing of this vaccine, is now labeled "noncredible vaccine commentary."

The pro-vaccine lobby is very quick to label anyone who questions the safety of vaccines as "anti-science." Yet, what most vaccine safety critics are trying to do is to reveal the science the pro-vaccine lobby doesn't want to share with the public. So, just who are the science deniers?

The pro-vaccine lobby is working hard to get laws passed that will force everyone to use every vaccine the pharmaceutical industry produces and the federal government recommends. If forced vaccination lobbyists get their way, only studies confirming preconceived notions that all vaccines are safe and effective in all instances will be deemed "real science." Everything else is "pseudoscience" or plain "misinformation."

Not only is this censorship trend endangering public health by hiding reality, it's also endangering the very foundation of the field of science by ushering in a highly-radicalized form of faith-based science, where you form an opinion and only allow studies that support that opinion to see the light of day. That's already happening, but we're bound to get much more of it if we continue down this path.

We cannot make sensible decisions about our health and that of our children when all we get is half the story. The video below, "Our Girls Are Not Rumors — Stories of the HPV (Gardasil) Vaccine," is a perfect example of the devastation wrought by incomplete vaccine disclosures. Yet media, largely owned by Big Pharma, tries to write these real-world effects off as nothing but fake news.
In Criminals We Trust?
According to the vaccine lobby, information highlighting the lack of safety is too dangerous to be read. You should just trust the vaccine industry, the makers of these lifesaving marvels.

The problem with that is that most of them have been found guilty in civil courts of engaging in unethical, even criminal, behavior. Why should we trust companies with shoddy ethics that engage in criminal behavior? In my view, this is an unreasonable demand.

Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Baxter International have all graced AllBusiness' Top 100 Corporate Criminals List, along with 13 other drug companies. For example, at the height of the bird flu pandemic of 2009, Baxter "mistakenly" mixed the lethal, live, biological weapon/virus, H5N1, with seasonal flu, then sent it to labs around Europe.

In the largest health care fraud settlement in history, Pfizer was ordered to pay $2.3 billion to resolve criminal and civil allegations that the company illegally promoted uses of four of its drugs, including the painkiller Bextra, and GlaxoSmithKline was found to have spent 11 years covering up trial data showing Avandia was a risky drug for the heart.

In 2012, Pharmaceutical-technology.com reported50 GlaxoSmithKline was in hot water again after a court in Argentina found the company mismanaged a Synflorix vaccine trial that killed 14 babies. Synflorix is a pediatric vaccine against pneumonia and meningitis, much like Pfizer's blockbuster vaccine Prevnar. According to Pharmaceutical-technology.com:

"The firm was fined $93,000 for failing to obtain parental consent to conduct the trials on 15,000 Argentine babies, and an additional 9,000 babies from Colombia and Panama, between 2007 and 2008.

The children were recruited from poor families. Evidence from Argentina's medical regulator said that, in some cases, GlaxoSmithKline pressured parents and grandparents to sign lengthy consent forms that they couldn't understand … GlaxoSmithKline was also criticised [sic] by Judge Marcelo Aguinsky for keeping inadequate records of the children's ages and medical histories."

Unethical Vaccine Testing Methods Have Been the Norm

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yevV_slu7Dw

The sad truth is that GlaxoSmithKline's "mismanagement" was not a one-off event. As reported by Collective-Evolution,51 while under oath, "Dr. Stanley Plotkin, known as one of the fathers of vaccines, reveals … testing vaccines on orphans, colonial ruled populations, babies whose mothers are in prison, and mentally handicapped children." In a letter to the editor of "Ethics on Human Experimentation," Plotkin wrote:

"The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential?"

A short outtake of his testimony covering these specific points is in the video above. The full nine-hour video testimony can be found on Youtube.52 I also suggest reading through "The 6 Top Thugs of the Medical World… As Ranked by 'Top 100 Corporate Criminals List" for a general overview of the companies you're being told to trust blindly and without question.

The Fallacy of Censorship as a Conformity Builder
What we have here is a highly profitable vaccine industry, which has no civil liability for any of the health problems caused by the use of their products, that lobbies government to mandate vaccines, while simultaneously insisting on censoring criticism of vaccine safety and effectiveness, and blocking parents from publicly describing real-life experiences about how their healthy children were injured or died after vaccinations, and refusing to conduct well-designed scientific research that investigates evidence of harm.

The end result cannot be anything other than mounting public distrust, because this simply isn't how honest corporations and industries who conduct business with transparency and integrity go about making a profit. There's no need for censorship when you have nothing to hide and are willing to address shortcomings or product risks to ensure safety and effectiveness.

On top of it all, we now also have an up-cropping of self-appointed arbiters of truth and trustworthiness, such as NewsGuard — a company that right out of the gate failed to adhere to one of its own tenets of trustworthiness: transparency. From the outset, NewsGuard "declined to disclose" the size of its revenue stream in its U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing.53

You can learn more about NewsGuard and its funders in "Beware: New Plan to Censor Health Websites" and "Ghost in the Machine Part 6: Mainstream Media Censors News That Threatens Its Financial Interests."
One of the Most Powerful Videos I've Ever Seen
The following video from Barbara Loe Fisher is one of the most powerful videos that I have ever seen. I am hopeful that watching this video will inspire you to take up the cause and join the fight for vaccine freedom and independence.

There is a cultural war and collusion between many industries and federal regulatory agencies that results in a suppression of the truth about vital important health issues. If this suppression continues we will gradually and progressively erode our private individual rights that our ancestors fought so hard to achieve. Please take a few minutes to watch this video.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xEcYQydhY9E

Protect Your Right To Informed Consent and Defend Vaccine Exemptions
With all the uncertainty surrounding the safety and efficacy of vaccines, it's critical to protect your right to make independent health choices and exercise voluntary informed consent to vaccination. It is urgent that everyone in America stand up and fight to protect and expand vaccine informed consent protections in state public health and employment laws. The best way to do this is to get personally involved with your state legislators and educating the leaders in your community.
See: https://vaccines.mercola.com/

Think Globally, Act Locally.
National vaccine policy recommendations are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being threatened by lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations, and public health officials, who are trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws.

Signing up for NVIC's free Advocacy Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own state legislators on your smart phone or computer so you can make your voice heard. You will be kept up to date on the latest state bills threatening your vaccine choice rights and get practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community.
Also, when national vaccine issues come up, you will have the up to date information and call to action items you need at your fingertips. So please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN! https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx

Share Your Story With the Media and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury, or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up. Write a letter to the editor if you have a different perspective on a vaccine story that appears in your local newspaper. Make a call in to a radio talk show that is only presenting one side of the vaccine story.

I must be frank with you; you have to be brave because you might be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of the vaccine story. Be prepared for it and have the courage to not back down. Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true about vaccination, will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

We cannot allow the drug companies and medical trade associations funded by drug companies or public health officials promoting forced use of a growing list of vaccines to dominate the conversation about vaccination.

The vaccine injured cannot be swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than "statistically acceptable collateral damage" of national one-size-fits-all mandatory vaccination policies that put way too many people at risk for injury and death. We shouldn't be treating people like guinea pigs instead of human beings.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the website of the non-profit charity, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at www.NVIC.org:

NVIC Memorial for Vaccine Victims — View descriptions and photos of children and adults, who have suffered vaccine reactions, injuries, and deaths. If you or your child experiences an adverse vaccine event, please consider posting and sharing your story here.
If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions — Learn how to recognize vaccine reaction symptoms and prevent vaccine injuries.
Vaccine Freedom Wall — View or post descriptions of harassment and sanctions by doctors, employers, and school and health officials for making independent vaccine choices.
Vaccine Failure Wall — View or post descriptions about vaccines that have failed to work and protect the vaccinated from disease.
Connect With Your Doctor or Find a New One That Will Listen and Care
If your pediatrician or doctor refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, intimidation, and refusal of medical care is becoming the modus operandi of the medical establishment in an effort to stop the change in attitude of many parents about vaccinations after they become truly educated about health and vaccination. However, there is hope.

At least 15 percent of young doctors recently polled admit that they're starting to adopt a more individualized approach to vaccinations in direct response to the vaccine safety concerns of parents.

It is good news that there is a growing number of smart young doctors, who prefer to work as partners with parents in making personalized vaccine decisions for children, including delaying vaccinations or giving children fewer vaccines on the same day or continuing to provide medical care for those families, who decline use of one or more vaccines.

So take the time to locate a doctor, who treats you with compassion and respect, and is willing to work with you to do what is right for your child

Sources and References
1, 5, 7, 8 Financial Times April 24, 2016
2 Skeptical Raptor November 5, 2017
3 FDA.gov Prevnar 13
4 Axios.com February 5, 2019
6 CNBC May 12, 2019
9 Reuters May 21, 2019
10 Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Gavi’s mission.
11 Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. The United States Government and the World Health Organization. May 14, 2018.
12 Martens J, Seitz K. Philanthropic Power and Development: Who Shapes the Agenda?
13 WHO.int Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019
14 CBS News January 30, 2019
15 HRSA.gov, Vaccine Injury Compensation Data
16 U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), Data & Statistics, November 2018 (PDF)
17 U.S. House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Confronting a Growing Public Health Threat: Measles Outbreaks in the U.S.
18, 22, 24 The Vaccine Reaction February 28, 2019
19 MMRII Vaccine Insert
20 CDC.gov Vaccine information statement MMR
21 CDC.gov Vaccine information statement MMRV
23 Vaccine. 2015 Jun 26; 33(29): 3288–3292
25 Axios February 14, 2019
26 THV 11 February 22, 2019
27 Stat News Feb. 28, 2019
28 Richard Pan. Letter to Surgeon General Adams. Feb. 19, 2019.
29 Sacramento Bee February 19, 2019
30 WAMU 9 Mar. 6, 2019
31 CBS2 New York, April 16, 2019
32 KUTV May 12, 2019
33 CNN February 27, 2019
34, 35, 36, 37, 40 Washington Post March 18, 2019
38 Huffington Post March 3, 2019
39 Variety March 1, 2019
41 CBS News March 20, 2019
42 BBC.com May 10, 2019
43 Endgadget May 9, 2019
44 Blog.twitter.com May 10, 2019
45 The Highwire May 16, 2019
46 Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(17):2630-7
47 Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology March 2018; 46: 76-82
48 Icandecide.org Documents obtained via FOIA from FDA
49 PR Newswire May 2, 2019
50 Pharmaceutical-technology.com January 10, 2012
51 Collective Evolution January 2, 2019
52 Youtube Lars P, Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines under oath full 9 hour video
53 United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form D, NewsGuard

[Delight]

This is

Dr. Christian Bogner, M.D.
Medical Director
Dr. Bogner is continuously striving to bring forth cutting-edge research for effective therapeutic options. Having lectured both nationally and internationally on autism spectrum disorders, Dr. Bogner’s goal is to optimize each affected individual’s path for recovery by integrating the latest research in this field of medicine. His commitment to healing through nutrition is exemplified by his accomplishment receiving his certificate in Plant-Based Nutrition from Cornell University. His primary interests are hyperbaric and phytocannabinoid therapeutics as well as stem cell research.https://oxfordrecoverycenter.com/sta...istian-bogner/

AutismOne Media
Published on May 28, 2019
Identification of key aspects in nutrition, methylation genetics, neurotransmission and the microbiome will allow integration into advancing technologies like hyperbaric oxygen therapy, neurofeedback and phytonutrient intervention. While optimizing brain plasticity with this concept of synergy, a non-traditional, holistic applied behavioral analysis approach is then added for the re-wiring and continuous learning process.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-KBabs-Hews

Cannabinoid Synergy With Hyperbaric Oxygen - Bogner
June 1, 2018
The literature supports various pathophysiologies in individuals affected with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), including cerebral hypoperfusion, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction and
oxidative stress. It has been hypothesized that children affected with ASD might benefit from Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) owing to the increase in cerebral perfusion occurring during treatment. Various hyperbaric centers have utilized HBOT to treat individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The cell-danger response and endocannabinoid signaling pathways have been described as possible key elements in the pathophysiology of microglia driven
neuroinflammation, with resulting behavioral problems associated with ASD. With the growing body of evidence in the literature that describes beneficial phytocannabinoid effects in patients
affected with ASD, we highlight the principle mechanisms of a novel concept, e.g. phytocannabinoid-hyperbaric-oxygen synergy and its role in paving the way for faster and lasting clinical benefits.

HBOT is approved for several clinical disorders including decompression sickness, gas gangrene, cyanide poisoning and diabetic wounds. Inhalation of above-atmospheric oxygen
might result in an elevation of arterial partial pressure of oxygen, leading to increased oxygen delivery to the brain. HBOT might also have anti-inflammatory properties due to the reduction of
pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor–α, interferon-γ, and interleukins 1 and 6). Furthermore, HBOT might improve mitochondrial dysfunction, as well as up-regulate the
production of antioxidant enzymes. While some studies suggest improved cerebral perfusion, others showed decreased markers of inflammation and did not worsen oxidative stress markers in
children with ASD. In the reviewed studies, HBOT had minimal adverse effects and was well tolerated. Most of the reviewed studies relied on changes in behavioral measurements, which
may lag behind physiological changes. In our protocol, we utilize different ATAs in monoplace chambers for all ASD children.
The molecular collusion of hyperbaric oxygen and phytocannabinoids suggests synergistic properties, aiding in anti-inflammation, detoxification, improved synaptic plasticity and central nervous system homeostasis.

Christian Bogner, MD, FACOG

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Pd3Jx4VNFok

slides from presentation Cannabinoid Synergy With Hyperbaric Oxygen - Bogner

[Delight]

Dr. Rashid Buttar's son was diagnosed with autism after immunizations. He used protocols to detox and his son recovered. He thinks autism is related to an inability to remove heavy metals, especially mercury from the body he observes that this genetic issue is also correlated with high synthetic intelligence. He has concluded that there may well be a conspiratorial element to the vaccine program.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RH6_XwDk-fc

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=83wfuAxtP1c

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8sxk8_rwwR8

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-y60q95N-DU

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=h6XDWF4UkUg

[onawah]

Rubber Stamping—The FDA and Vaccines—Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health: Part IV
MAY 29, 2019
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...urce=mailchimp

"By the Children’s Health Defense Team

[Note: This is Part IV in a series of articles adapted from the second Children’s Health Defense eBook: Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health. The first eBook, The Sickest Generation: The Facts Behind the Children’s Health Crisis and Why It Needs to End, described how children’s health began to worsen dramatically in the late 1980s following fateful changes in the childhood vaccine schedule.]

The vaccine industry has been burgeoning since the late 1980s, when Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) that provided manufacturers with blanket immunity from liability. Two regulatory agencies have played a pivotal role in this vaccine “renaissance”: the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Working hand in glove with vaccine companies, these agencies have helped protect and grow the liability-free childhood vaccine market, ensuring billions of dollars in corporate revenues with little need for vaccine makers to even advertise or market their products.

Although credible accusations have surfaced for years—aired by legislators, researchers, watchdog groups and many others—that both the FDA and CDC lack the impartiality required to make accurate judgments about vaccine safety, the two agencies continue with their business-as-usual practices. With vaccine promotion superseding vaccine safety monitoring as organizational goals, conflicts of interest are baked into both agencies’ DNA.

In this article, we examine the FDA’s role in licensing vaccines and ignoring vaccine injuries. The next article (Part V) will describe the crucial part played by the CDC in creating and promoting the bloated childhood vaccine schedule.

… the clinical trials for Merck’s Recombivax hepatitis B vaccine (approved for administration on the first day of life) monitored fewer than 150 infants and children for five days after each dose. Buried in the vaccine’s package insert is the information that autoimmune diseases and an apparent hypersensitivity syndrome…of delayed onset have been reported days to weeks after vaccination.
Speeding vaccines to market
FDA oversight of vaccines—classified as “biological products” rather than drugs—falls under the jurisdiction of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). The FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) handles other drugs and certain over-the-counter products. For both CDER and CBER, “it is the responsibility of the company seeking to market a drug [or biologic] to test it and submit evidence that it is safe and effective.”

Drug and vaccine manufacturers have an obvious interest in painting a rosy picture of their products, but the classification of vaccines as “biologics” allows vaccine makers to speed their products to market with far less onerous safety testing than is required of other new drugs. In fact, vaccine prelicensing studies often feature fatal methodological flaws that make it nearly impossible to identify safety risks.

The majority of prelicensing clinical trials have an absurdly brief period of observation (sometimes as short as a few days or weeks), which makes it impossible to evaluate longer-term outcomes such as autoimmune illness or cancer. For example, the clinical trials for Merck’s Recombivax hepatitis B vaccine (approved for administration on the first day of life) monitored fewer than 150 infants and children for five days after each dose. Buried in the vaccine’s package insert is the information that autoimmune diseases and “an apparent hypersensitivity syndrome…of delayed onset [have] been reported days to weeks after vaccination” [emphasis added].

Placebo-controlled trials are widely recognized as the gold standard for evaluating vaccine safety and efficacy. However, prelicensing studies typically test new vaccines against existing vaccines instead of using true placebos (defined as “an inert substance, such as a saline injection”). This type of vaccine-to-vaccine comparison makes it possible to mask adverse reactions by claiming that there are no differences between groups.

In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, allowing pharmaceutical companies to make payments to the FDA (called “user fees”) in exchange for expedited approval of drugs and biologics, including vaccines.
Captured agency
Captured agencies operate “essentially as…advocate[s] for the industries they regulate,” abrogating their duty to act in the public’s interest. Vaccine and drug fast-tracking provide a clear example of FDA regulatory capture. In 1992, Congress passed the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, allowing pharmaceutical companies to make payments to the FDA (called “user fees”) in exchange for expedited approval of drugs and biologics, including vaccines. Additional legislation in 2012 further facilitated “accelerated” approval by allowing the FDA to use surrogate endpoints to evaluate a drug or vaccine rather than waiting to assess longer-term clinical benefits.

According to a 2015 report in Fortune magazine, pharmaceutical companies are more than willing to pay “big bucks” to speed up FDA approval. In the process, they gain extraordinary leverage over regulatory decision-making. Whereas the FDA was publicly funded prior to 1992, the agency now receives 45% of its annual budget from industry. Moreover, in fiscal year 2017, three-fourths (75%) of FDA’s annual budget increase came from user fees, with the pharmaceutical industry in essence paying regulators’ salaries.

Unheeded warnings
In former times, researchers and regulators knew that approval of a vaccine did not preempt the need for ongoing, post-licensure safety monitoring. Indeed, those closest to vaccine development have periodically issued warnings about the need for greater caution and scrutiny. Back in 1961, a leading polio researcher stated in Science that “even after licensing, a new vaccine product must be considered to be on trial” because of the many “new variables” that accompany large-scale vaccine production and rollout. In 1999, the head of CBER’s Viral Products Division contended that advances in vaccine technology were “outpacing researchers’ ability to predict potential vaccine-related adverse events.” Both of these well-founded warnings went largely unheeded.

Nowadays, the FDA (along with the CDC and other government agencies) plays mostly a cheerleader role, assuring residents that the U.S. has “the safest, most effective vaccine supply in history.” The vaccine industry makes similar claims, bragging about the “exhaustive and continuous” safety assessment of vaccines, including post-approval. All of these statements blithely skirt around the fact—attested to by the over $4 billion in payouts from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—that vaccines cause permanent disability and death with some regularity.

It is likely that millions of adverse reactions to vaccines are occurring in the U.S. every year—yet, precisely because these injuries nearly always go unreported, official discussions of vaccine safety remain hugely misleading.
Underreporting of vaccine injury
As part of the NCVIA, legislators gave a nod to the potential for vaccine damage by mandating that the FDA and CDC jointly establish a safety monitoring system to collect and analyze “spontaneous reports of adverse events that occur in persons following vaccination.” That system—the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)—has received nearly 700,000 reports of post-vaccination adverse events since 1990. However, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has estimated that these reports represent only 1% of vaccine injuries. It is likely that millions of adverse reactions to vaccines are occurring in the U.S. every year—yet, precisely because these injuries nearly always go unreported, official discussions of vaccine safety remain hugely misleading.

When it comes to reporting vaccine injuries, physicians are critical intermediaries between patients and vaccine manufacturers. Among the factors that work to prevent doctors from recognizing and reporting adverse events are the lack of medical school training on vaccine adverse reactions and low awareness of VAERS. A large and nationally representative study of health care providers (including physicians, mid-level providers and nurses) found that slightly more than a third (37%) had ever identified a post-vaccination adverse event, but only 17% of that subgroup had ever made a report to VAERS. A qualitative study of health providers in Australia (where vaccine policies are, in key ways, similar to those in the U.S.) found that providers often experienced “confusion” about the types of events that would constitute “reportable” adverse events and also were unclear on how to define “serious” adverse events.

For the sake of America’s children, it is essential to ensure that all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals be free from conflicts of interest.
A “coincidence”??? Puh-leeze!
In discussing VAERS, FDA and CDC researchers like to have it both ways. On the one hand, they praise the reporting system for guiding further safety evaluations, but on the other hand, the agencies warn that “VAERS data interpreted alone or out of context can lead to erroneous conclusions about cause and effect as well as the risk of adverse events occurring following vaccination.” They also take pains to point out that “an adverse health event or health problem that occurs following or during administration of a vaccine…might be caused by a vaccine or might be coincidental and not related to vaccination” [emphasis added]. In fact, government authors who churn out boilerplate articles about vaccine safety exhibit a fondness for the notion that post-vaccination mishaps are simply a fluke. Industry, too, likes to tell the public that it has “guidelines and algorithms” to differentiate between a post-vaccination adverse event that “may” be causally related to a vaccine versus an event that is coincidental to vaccination.

Even when the adverse event in question is a death “temporally associated with vaccination,” government researchers like to rely on the coincidence argument—all the while conceding that “loved ones and others might naturally question whether it was related to vaccination”! This, despite admitting to “rare cases where a known or plausible theoretical risk of death following vaccination exists,” such as cases involving anaphylaxis; vaccine-strain systemic infection (following administration of live vaccines to persons with compromised immune systems); intussusception (after rotavirus vaccine); Guillain-Barré syndrome (after inactivated influenza vaccine); fall-related injuries (associated with post-vaccination fainting); systemic or neurologic disease (following yellow fever vaccination); serious complications such as brain inflammation and heart problems (from smallpox vaccination); and vaccine-associated paralytic polio (from oral polio vaccine).

With the FDA’s disproportionate reliance on user fees to fill out its budget, and silly arguments about “coincidences,” it is difficult to make a convincing case that the agency’s vaccine licensing decisions remain uncontaminated by pharmaceutical industry preferences. For the sake of America’s children, it is essential to ensure that all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals be free from conflicts of interest."

[onawah]

From InPower Movement ( https://www.inpowermovement.com/ ) :
Dr. Tenpenny and Robert Scott Bell:
"Science Bites will cover a new vaccine every month, presenting thorough information about that vaccine in bite-size increments, hence the name, and in an easy-to-digest sequence so viewers and listeners can quickly learn the most important facts without having to spend endless hours digging around for it in the scientific journals."

Be sure to check out the first episode of this series on Science Bites at :
https://www.brighteon.com/6037837520001
( there is a whole series of talks about vaccines at brighteon.com )

[Delight]

Concern expressed in 2018 over French legal mandate for vaccination.

"On one side, Professor Luc Montagnier. On the other, Professor Henri Joyeux. The first is a virologist, Nobel Prize in Medicine, member of the Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Medicine. The second, a former professor of oncology, specialist in digestive surgery, is also laureate of the Antoine Lacassagne cancer prize awarded by the National League against Cancer. Two impressive CVs"

APPEAL TO REASON

11 vaccines: Urgent appeal to health professionals and staff
Dear colleagues, dear sisters, dear confreres

The new law, a serious mistake of public health
The new law imposing 11 childhood vaccinations is a serious public health mistake. It has been widely mentioned by the press.

We health professionals, prescribers and / or vaccinators are bound by the law on a path that could turn against some of our own patients, against our profession, and against ourselves.

You will understand why. This Appeal highlights important elements on the subject. Read it carefully before agreeing to sign it.

We are not against vaccines: we are opposed to systematic vaccinations and too many before the age of 2 years.

These practices expose small children to complications because their immune system is not ready to receive so many antigenic aggression.

This is the way to fear:

Sudden deaths of the infant, even if they are rare;
Serious and debilitating chronic autoimmune diseases in the following years, particularly because of the presence of excessive amounts of aluminum adjuvant in the composition of most vaccines;
Risks of particular cancers, bones, muscles, cartilages .. that sarcomas, extremely serious in adolescents and young adults, already detected in animals receiving vaccines with aluminum adjuvant.
You are personally concerned if you are:
General and Specialist Physicians and Surgeons,
Hospital interns whatever the specialties,
Medical students, pharmacy, physiotherapy,
Community or industry pharmacists,
Midwives, Nurses and Other Health Personnel
graduated or in training.
If you belong to the general public, outside health professions, do not hesitate to propose this text to those who treat you. They are more than ever concerned and responsible.

This Call is launched by two medical professors:

Pr Luc Montagnier Pr Henri Joyeux
Professor Luc Montagnier
Nobel Prize in Medicine for the discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Pr Henri Joyeux
International Cancer Prize for its work in Nutrition

Here is the official list of the first 120 signatories

Dr. Bernard Albouy, Dr. Anne Anthonissen, Dr. Bernard Astruc, Dr. Xavier Aubrun, Dr. Jacqueline BAHU, Dr. Nathalie Barral, Dr. Ann-Marie Bendahan, Dr. Françoise Berthoud - Pediatrician, Dr. Etienne Binet, Dr. Anne Borde, Dr. Anne BORIE, Dr. Anick Bossy, Colette Braud Pharmacist, Dr. Pierre-Eugène de Braucourt, Dr. Gerard Breton, Dr. Carole Bloch, Alexia Boiron Pediatric Nurse, François Cabanis Osteopath, Marie-Martine Chabanne Pharmacist, Dr. Jacques Chevassu, Dr. Christian Carrere, Dr. Jean-Louis Chamblas, Dr. Marie Dominique Chemin, Dr. Gérard Coanon, Dr. Alain Coiffard, Dr. Christian Coulon, Dr. Louis-Marie Coupé, Christine Cuisiniez Pharmacist, Dr. Philippe Dechazournes, Catherine Deglesne Pharmacist, Dr. André Devos, Dr. Drogou Françoise, Dr. Maurice Dubail, Dr. Chantal Duley , Dr. Carole Dupont, Dr. Agnès Dupond, Dr. Eric Dupré, Dr. Caroline Duvert-Gouverneur, Dr. Bénédicte Echard, Dr. Guy Ferré, Dr. Marie Caroline Fleury Munier, Dr. Marie-Dominique Fouqueray, Pr Jean-Bernard Fo urtillan Professor of Therapeutic Chemistry, Dr. Jean Garnier, Chantal Giannoni Early Childhood Educator, Nursery Director, Dr. Alexandre Girard, Dr. Jean-Jacques Grenouillet, Patrick Giusti, Dr. Albert Hache, Dr. Véronique Hajek-Maurer, Dr. Claude HERMANN, Dr. Françoise Hulin, Dr. Alina Ionescu, Dr. Michèle Jeammet, Prof. Henri Joyeux, Dr. Michel Kasbarian, Dr. Ines Kint, Dr. Philippe Koch, Dr. Danielle Kuhn, Dr. Petra Kunze, Dr. Dominique Larroque, Dr. Simone Le Brun, Dr. Véronique Ledieu, Dr. Jérôme Lesage, Dr. Nicole Maguy, Dr. Gérard Malhomme, Dr. Jean-Claude Mamelle, Dr. Martine Masseguin, Dr. Christian Mauroy, Dr. Edith Mebsi, Dr. Mardiros Meguerditchian, Dr. Martine Masseguin, Dr. Bénédicte Mignot, Isabelle Minvielle Pharmacist, Alain Millot Osteopath, Pr Luc Montagnier, Dr. Dominique Mossino, Isabelle Morin Desleau, nursery nurse, nursery director, Dr. Lucie Nicolle, Dr. Jean-Robert Nieddu, Florence Nguyen Pharmacist, Dr. Sambologo Ouedraogo, Dr. Michel Parini, Dr. Jean Marie Pell egrin, Dr. Delphine Perche, Dr. Nicole Perrot, Dr. Marie-Antoinette Piens, Dr. Rodolphe Picquet, Dr. Jean-Pierre Poinsignon, Dr. Jean-Michel Pon, Dr. Françoise Pons, Dr. Dominique Prost, Dr. Denis Pugeaut, Dr. Annabelle Rimalou, Dr. Christelle Rolland Dental Surgery, Dr. Pierre Rouzaud, Dr. Louis Ruhlmann, Dr. Jean-Didier of Saint Florent, Dr. Patrick Salvia, Dr. Marie Schmutz, Dr. Hugues Schwieg, Dr. Jean SENTUCQ-RIGAL, Pierre Sindezingue Pharmacist, Dr. Hervé Staub, Dr. Patrick Stora, Dr. Laurent Subiger, Dr. Jacques Suisse, Dr. Jean Louis Uchan, Dr. Frédéric Vallée Pharmacien, Dr. Ludovic Valsesia, Dr. Jean-Paul Toueille, Dr. Annie Trosler-Vergnet, Dr. Luc Vangermeersch, Dr. Pauline de Vaux, Dr. Noëlle Vescovali, Sébastien Viac Osteopath, Dr. Alain Vitiello, Dr. Fançois Volff, Dr. Agnes Wagner, Dr. Philippe Watine, Dr. Jean Paul Zemb Pediatrician


Here are 3 extremely serious decisions.
- Any child born in France from 1 January 2018 must now receive before his 2 years eleven vaccines, against three previously.

- Unvaccinated children will no longer have access to collective reception facilities as of June 1, 2018.

- Reluctant parents no longer fall under the Public Health Code, but the Criminal Code on child health that provides for a much heavier sentence: two years in prison and 30,000 euros fine.

No specific instructions are given regarding the immune status of children. Nothing is said to promote breastfeeding, - respecting the choice of the mother - yet recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and yet provides the best natural protection [1] . Breastfeeding makes it possible to postpone vaccinations beyond two years, if the parents are in good health.

This sharp increase in the number of compulsory vaccines, and sanctions, is presented by the Minister of Solidarities and Health, Agnès Buzyn, as a way to " restore the confidence of the French " in vaccination.

This is a counter-Sense of Public Health, whose minister - supported in fact by vaccine manufacturers - wants to make families responsible.

However:

Is the process scientific ? Is it medically justified ? Is it finally so democratic ?
Is it respectful of the precautionary principle and French law and international treaties signed by France?
Is it beneficial to the health of the children concerned , and of the general public ??
The device put in place by the law is unfortunately more than doubtful, tainted by vagueness or opacity.

Will families have to ask us, before any vaccination, a certificate of responsibility in case of complications?

For the 11 diseases, the infant will have to receive before his 2 years at least four intramuscular injections, besides the reminders :

- 1 hexavalent injection against Diphtheria-Tetanus-Polio-Pertussis-Haemophilus Inflenzae b and Hepatitis B;

- 1 injection against Measles-Mumps-Rubella (3 attenuated viruses);

- 1 injection against Meningococcus C;

- 1 to 2 injections against Pneumococci: a vaccine against 13 kinds of pneumococci (13-valent vaccine) and a vaccine against 23 kinds of pneumococci (23-valent vaccine).

Why your action is important today
We, Professor Luc Montagnier and Professor Henri Joyeux, are today launching this Call to our confreres and all health personnel in France, because of an even more immediate danger that concerns you personally as a health professional.

As a health professional, you are ultimately the only person responsible for all the acts you do on your patients.

Today, the Minister of Health suggests that the French state will "cover" all cases of accidents or side effects related to vaccines.

However, tomorrow, the new laws on "class actions" led by patient associations, could make you vulnerable to personal prosecution , with potentially dramatic consequences for both your professional and personal life. .

This is all the more true as the manufacturing laboratories have released their responsibility , even though their vaccines have not undergone all the tests that are required for the drugs that must obtain a Marketing Authorization (Marketing Authorization). .

The effects of the eleven vaccines on the immature immune system of children under two years old and from the sixth week of life carry many questions in their own right which Science has not yet answered , especially in the appearance of chronic or autoimmune inflammatory diseases.

It will be very difficult to support the opposite in Justice: several judgments including at European level have already condemned laboratories following diseases related to aluminum such as macrophage myofasciitis but also other diseases such as multiple sclerosis (Hepatitis B vaccine). [2]

Currently, a procedure is under way before the Council of State, at the request of 3055 people to remove the aluminum adjuvant present in the mandatory vaccines and replace it with calcium phosphate. The Minister of Health must respond no later than January 15, 2018 before the Council of State.

The possible negative consequences of the generalized vaccination obligation could expose health professionals to legal actions for the purpose of obtaining damages in the event of an accident . They could be examined tomorrow by the European Court of Human Rights.

That is why we invite you to position yourself officially with us to ask the Government for additional scientific evidence to justify its decision.

This is in no way to oppose the vaccine policy , or encourage any movement of "vaccine resistance", let alone challenge the effectiveness of vaccines to stem infectious diseases. No serious therapist can dispute the effectiveness of vaccination in many cases.

On the other hand, it is a matter of informing the Authorities of our questions , and our serious reservations , because our priority concern is the well-being and health of infants.

Imposing the eleven vaccines does not correspond initially to any public health need.

Contrary to what the authorities claim, there is no drop in "immunization coverage".

To justify its decision, the Minister of Health has, in fact, repeatedly referred to " a vaccine coverage that continues to decline ."

This is incorrect.

Official data from Public Health France indicate the opposite : in 2015, the coverage of 2-year-old children against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, whooping cough, and Haemophilus influenzae b, exceeded 95%, while it fluctuated between 87 and 91% between 2000 and 2013.

Coverage rates for other vaccines [3] were also increasing. The primary vaccination of the infant (3 doses) reached 98% or more for the DTP [4] which is " very high and consistent with public health objectives ", according to the organization.

If the government now makes eleven vaccines compulsory instead of three, it is for a perfectly well-known reason, which belongs to a completely different register than that of pure medicine.

This is to circumvent a DECISION of the Council of State, an administrative and non-medical jurisdiction, which concerned the former Minister of Health.

Indeed, on February 8, 2017, the Council of State, the supreme administrative court, asked the Ministry of Health " within six months, and except that the law evolves by expanding the scope of compulsory vaccinations, to take steps or to call on the competent authorities to make available vaccines corresponding to the only obligations ".

These "only matched" vaccines were the only proven DT-Polio that families are demanding. The petition that one of us launched < http://petition.ipsn.eu/penurie-vaccin-dt-polio/> on this subject was signed by 1,138,888 people without the slightest publicity of the big media, well on the contrary.

But the DT-Polio alone was no longer available in 2008, - by calculation and agreement between manufacturers - and in the scrupulous indifference of the Authorities, who let the stocks run out in pharmacies in 7 years . DTP only existed in combination with other vaccines called a multivalent vaccine.

Why did you choose this path when the law then in force, based on a non-controversial scientific basis, provided for the DTP alone?

In short, the obligation of the eleven vaccines makes it possible to align the legislation on vaccines with the state of fact imposed by the manufacturers , who have made the DTP unaccountable in pharmacy, without taking into account the requirement of the families.

Sign this APPEAL ON REASON to defend the interests of your patients and require the Authorities to debate on serious bases exclusively medical and scientific, outside the manufacturers and their affiliates.

No serious scientific or medical justification for choosing the eleven vaccines
The eleven currently mandatory vaccines were previously recommended by the Authorities on the immunization schedule, based on scientific data that has not been questioned; it's more than a nuance.

However, they do not necessarily correspond to diseases that represent a significant risk for ALL children.

In his July 2017 general policy address, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe cited the 10 deaths caused by measles between 2008 and 2016 to justify the measles vaccine requirement.

However, as responded by the National College of Teaching General Practitioners (CNGE), the majority of people who died had an immunodeficiency that contra-indicated this vaccination . Must we believe that the Prime Minister was not informed of this by his advisers?

Where is the logic ? We doctors, how can we still justify ourselves, remain credible in front of our patients who ask us for explanations ??

And that's not all. Why make vaccination against hepatitis B and meningococcal C mandatory?

- Hepatitis B is a disease that is transmitted only through blood and sexual contact. The vaccine is therefore useful in children whose parents carry the virus. However, there is mandatory screening for the mother at the end of the second trimester of pregnancy.

This vaccine is useless in at least 95% of infants. Why do they run the risk, even very low, adverse effects, if there is no benefit in return?

According to experts, the duration of protection against HBV remains uncertain, it would be long (> 15 years): currently, no recall seems necessary. It is therefore beyond 15 years that should be vaccinated and only those who run risks by their behavior or by their profession.

Finally assert that with the vaccine against hepatitis B, there is no neurological damage before 2 years, does not prejudge a later attack, when we know that there are 25 cases of multiple sclerosis (SEP) more each year (700 children in total in France), starting around 6 years old and in an average age of 11-12 years.

A rigorous epidemiological study is needed to compare MS cases with vaccination against DTP alone, and since the spread of recommended Hexavalent. We are waiting for it.

- C meningococcal infections are at infinitesimal risk in normal times. Vaccination should only be considered if there is a risk of a known outbreak. Apart from this case, in an open letter to MEPs, confreres general practitioners believe that: " universal vaccination against meningococcus C may cause more serious adverse effects in infants than benefits in the general population. [5] " We share their position.

There are currently 27 bacterial diseases, 27 viral diseases, 10 parasitic diseases, 2 mycobacterial diseases. The decision to vaccinate against some, and not others, requires a scientific debate that has not taken place .

There is logic, however, but it is not medical or scientific.

It is an administrative "logic" that suits the authorities, not to mention the pharmaceutical companies.

But this "logic" leads for us, health professionals, significant legal uncertainty. By conforming to it, we put ourselves in opposition with the French law and with the international law as you will verify it !!

Non-compliance of the immunization obligation of French law with international law
In 2005, UNESCO adopted the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights with a consensus of 193 countries including France . It stipulates that any preventive medical intervention must be carried out only with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned and based on sufficient information.

This is obviously not the case of compulsory vaccination that is imposed on parents under the threat of criminal sanctions and discriminatory exclusion of communities (excluding schools and crèches as of June 1, 2018). For example, children who are fragile in chemotherapy, or polyallergic patients who can not, should not be vaccinated, will they be excluded forever from communities? Nothing indicates it.

On the other hand, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights provides in its article 2 that the " only interest of Science or Society should not prevail ". However, the main argument put forward in support of the generalized vaccination obligation is the interest of society, in the name of the protection of persons who can not be vaccinated for medical reasons.

So here we are in the contradiction.

In addition, the new immunization obligation contradicts the law of 4 March 2002 on patients' rights, which states that " no medical act or treatment can be performed without the free and informed consent of the person ".

Finally, the " Principle of Precaution " , present in the French Constitution, is obviously opposed to full-scale experimentation, at the level of the entire population of newborns.

The decision to vaccinate must remain the responsibility of each doctor and each family, without imposing gestures that do not take into account heredity, nor the predispositions of the newborn, nor its living environment and its real risk. of infection for each disease.

This is the information that the doctor must obtain and it is not possible that it happens: we do not vaccinate blind.

This is the norm in most European countries where children are not more infected than in France, while vaccination is not compulsory.

Would it not be wiser for the government to reason in terms of recommendations and not on the obligation-sanctioning mode? Doctors and their patients are not stupid. And it is well known that accountability gives better results than guilt .
Does the Minister of Health really believe that she is going to restore confidence in vaccines by leaving as many worries on the shoulders of parents and health professionals?

No medical consensus or citizen on the eleven compulsory vaccinations
Citizen consultation took place, but, contrary to what the authorities and most of the media say today, this consultation was not in favor of the vaccination obligation.

The Diplomatic World of January 2018 recalls that the president of the citizens' consultation on vaccines, our colleague Alain Fischer, " did not note in his public declaration of interest that he received in 2013 a Sanofi-Institut Pasteur prize of 100,000 €. In addition, the conclusions presented by it did not reflect the consultation on major points. "

Professors Olivier Saint-Lary and Vincent Renard, respectively president and vice-president of the National College of Teaching General Practitioners (CNGE) have strongly reminded him in the "Le Quotidien du Médecin" of November 27, 2017 (page 15) under the title: " Vaccine requirement: the benefit / risk balance seems unfavorable. »:

" If a citizen consultation took place, none of the consultation groups (users and professionals) came out in favor of this obligation. Only the conclusion has proposed it by dispensing with the recommendations of both groups . "

We are therefore facing a democratic retreat. This element could also turn against the decision of the Ministry of Health.

The steering committee of citizen consultation on vaccination has also been denounced as " a real propaganda operation (...) conducted to encourage the French to be vaccinated " by the former Secretary General of the National Health Conference Thomas Dietrich [6] , who denounced the lack of transparency on health issues.

According to the association for independent medical information Formindep, this consultation constitutes " a complete failure " and translates " an alarming picture of our health democracy ".

The question of adjuvants, especially aluminum in vaccines, is not resolved
The antigens present in the vaccines are associated with ADJUVANTS which are not without risks [7] intended to stimulate in a non specific way the immune system of the infant under construction.

The most used in France is aluminum hydroxide

When Minister Agnès Buzyn reassures families by saying that this adjuvant has been used and well tolerated for 90 years, it does not take into account the quantity injected or the side effects, including the increase in allergic reactions. These side effects were previously unregistered and their poisoning abilities lower because previously less aluminum was brought. Not to mention that the recent practice of intramuscular injection of the vaccine makes it more harmful.

In addition, the considerable changes in our environment (chemical pollution of our food by herbicides, endocrine disruptors, and possibly also electromagnetic pollution) could weaken the immune responses to vaccines while promoting the penetration of aluminum into the brain. infants.

When the Minister looks to the big media to frighten families, takes pride in the decisions she makes, denigrates those who - without being against vaccines - but for a vaccination administration adapted to age and sex. Infant state, under the responsibility of the doctor, it does not adopt a responsible attitude.

However, we must not ignore that aluminum was:

- suppressed animal vaccines due to the appearance of sarcomas (very serious cancers), especially in cats, in the vaccination zone, or elsewhere in the bone system, cartilage, muscles.

An Italian study on " Fibrosarcomas of dogs at the injection site of vaccines. Comparison with those of cats ", is very clear, particularly in its introduction:" aluminum deposits were detected in 8 canine fibrosarcomas on the presumed site of the injection as well as in 11 feline post-vaccination fibrosarcomas by the aurintricarboxylic acid method. . [8]

We ask that research in this direction be carried out without delay in young people with sarcomas whatever the location.

- Aluminum has been removed from cosmetics because of its transcutaneous absorption which could increase the risk of breast cancer.

The animals, the beauty products are therefore sanctuarized. But not vaccines for children, while aluminum is directly injected into the muscle, bypassing the protections (intestinal barrier, epidermis).

The 11 mandatory vaccines for infants contain 3.8 mg of aluminum, injected into the muscles, which far exceeds the standards allowed for adults.

Contrary to what is repeated in many uninformed media, and by the minister herself, the toxicity of aluminum in vaccines has been clearly established by the works of Prof. Romain Gherardi [9] which have been the subject of international publications at the highest level.

Similarly, the team of Pr Christophe Exley, specialist in aluminum for 30 years, has recently been able to detect the toxic presence of aluminum in the brains of deceased autistic people. Some were just 14-15 years old. " Aluminum is intracellular. In neurons but especially in cells that are not neuronal. These are pro-inflammatory cells. Cells coming from the body that cross the blood-brain barrier by taking aluminum with them. < Https://www.prevention-sante.eu/actu...istopher-exley

This is the route of administration that is important, because taken digestive aluminum is normally rejected in the waste and therefore safe, which is not comparable to intramuscular injection, as some seek to believe, because then almost all of the vaccine aluminum is captured and retained in the immune system.

Aluminum hydroxide vaccines have the disadvantage of persisting very long (several years) in the body. This biopersistence is responsible for:

- macrophage myofasciitis in the vaccine injection area : on 22 December 2017, a woman received compensation for the development of macrophage myofasciitis after hepatitis B vaccination containing aluminum adjuvants;

- effects in other areas of the body, such as lymphoid organs, brain, bones, kidneys, with long-term effects that should not be hidden from the population.

Risk of sudden infant death following vaccination!
The sum of vaccines, used too early in newborns, can trigger a powerful inflammatory response , by release of special proteins made by an attacked immune system, cytokines [10] , which can cause sudden infant death.

A correlation of temporality is recognized in specific cases.

In the US, in 2017, a publication [11] reports among 20231 cases of complications reported after vaccination against hepatitis B, - 51% concerning children under 2 years -, 197 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), c 'ie, sudden infant deaths. In others of more than one month and less than two years, it is mainly the attacks of the nervous system that are observed.

Long before, a publication of Consumer Health (Volume 22 Issue 4 April, 1999), http://www.consumerhealth.org/articl...19990705002005 , by Dr. Viera Schreiber reported 41 cases of children who died in 21 days after the first vaccination injection. More than three-quarters of sudden deaths were correlated with vaccination.

Dr. Schreiber took care to record and analyze respiratory disorders in infants before and after vaccination. She gave her book " Vaccination: The Medical Assault on the Immune System".

In Japan, in 1975, 37 cases of sudden death were reported and related to vaccines. Immunizations before two years of age were then abolished by the Japanese government between 1975 and 1988. Reports of sudden deaths disappeared, until the freedom to vaccinate from 3 months to 48 months resumes, and the rate of sudden death returns on the rise.

In 1982, in Neurology , William C. Torch, pediatrician neurologist, published " Diphteria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunization: a potential cause of the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)" [12] . Out of 200 randomized cases, he reported 70 cases of sudden infant death, two-thirds of which had been vaccinated during the previous 3 weeks. He also observed an increase in the number of cases, if we take into account a larger delay.

Obviously all these publications were strongly and aggressively attacked . But we can not deny the temporal relationship between early vaccination and sudden death.

So this risk can not be ignored. You must be informed so that you know exactly the possible dangers of these 11 vaccines injected to infants before the age of two.

We consider it essential that this information be brought to your attention.

Indian doctors in 2017, report after hexavalent vaccination, - that which is part of the first 6 of the 11 vaccinations today mandatory -, among the sudden deaths, 93.3% of deaths of infants of less than one year in the 10 first days after vaccination, with concentration for the first 3 days, and 7% within 10 days.

In those over one year of age , 83% of deaths were recorded in the first 10 days and 17% after the 10th day . [13] The publication refers to the confidential report (No. 19) provided to the European authorities (EMA, European Medical Agency) by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) on the subject. Indian colleagues are asking the health authorities in their country to revise their confidence in the claims of the EMA.

That is why it should be the sole responsibility of the physician, and under his responsibility, to prescribe in confidence with the families, such or such vaccination in infants, children or adults, according to their state of health and their needs of protection, according to their environment and their way of life.

For true recognition of complications related to vaccination
The great reluctance of families to compulsory vaccinations is also explained by the fact that the complications related to vaccines, which are more numerous and more serious than those claimed by the health authorities, do not take into account.

The cases of autism, [14] fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, narcolepsy, and other autoimmune diseases attributed by patients to their vaccination remain too numerous [15] to be definitively ruled out.

According to Professor Daniel Floret, President of the Technical Committee on Immunization, " it is generally accepted that 1 to 10% of serious side effects related to drugs are reported to regional pharmacovigilance centers [16] " which means that the overwhelming majority of cases are not analyzed.

In particular, it has not been demonstrated that no link will ever be established with vaccination, especially for cases of cancers observed in children and young people, such as sarcomas, very serious cancers, which have been linked to aluminum in animals in different parts of the body, but remain in children and young people with no known cause (s), apart from major immune depression.

In the face of these very real risks, confidence will only be restored by offering the best vaccines needed , injected separately according to the age of the child, tested as drugs, and which will no longer contain harmful adjuvants .

No to precipitation
So far, the French authorities have turned a deaf ear and do not listen to citizens who express themselves, immediately labeled "conspiracy" and "anti", or health professionals who worry.

Those who dare to take part in the debate are too rare and then too easily accused of being "anti-vaccines". This ostracism is led by all those who want to impose vaccinations in a hurry, without studying in detail the possible consequences.

This does not correspond to our position which is cautious, scientifically and medically sound, and which is in line with the conclusions of many independent laboratory experts.

Today, the government's hasty decision to impose the mandatory eleven vaccines puts the entire medical profession in a more than uncomfortable position.

Before the first consequences of law enforcement occur, we invite you to sign this APPEAL FOR REASON to ask questions and request an open debate on medical and scientific grounds.

We are in a democracy and the strength of the number is essential to make the debate alive and prevent the confinement in a binding, authoritarian, and blind policy, whose collateral damage is known in advance.

Today, we are assured that everything will be fine. The recent cases of the Picks and other drugs, where many practitioners have been implicated, prove that the assurances of the authorities are illusory.

In any case, they are not in conformity with the Hippocratic Oath and the principle of the responsibility of the doctor.

This is why we invite you to sign our Call for Reason, and to transfer this message to all the practitioners around you.

Again, it is not about to oppose the principle of vaccination, but on the contrary to reaffirm against an adventurous policy that can only lead to sowing even more doubt in the minds!

According to the Vaccine Confidence Project, whose results were published on EBioMedicine in September 2016, 41% of French respondents believe that vaccines are not safe, a world record, despite a pro-vaccine propaganda recent intense.

The phenomenon can no longer be ignored. It goes well beyond the circle of anti-vaccine activists, which remains very marginal and to which we too often seek to associate ourselves without any discrimination.

To restore confidence, let us ask the government for dialogue, transparency, a real scientific debate based on medical evidence, for a decision that truly reflects the good of everyone.

In conclusion we ask for a formal and official commitment of the health authorities on the following 5 points
- No compulsory vaccination before the child's two years , unless justified and prescribed by the responsible physician.

- Taking into account the protection by the antibodies of breast milk so that the maximum number of children can benefit from it (and according to the free choice of the mother), as recommended by the WHO, to push back the dates of vaccinations .

- The imperative submission of vaccines to appropriate tests, inspired by those of the drugs to obtain the AMM.

- The removal of vaccinating infants against hepatitis B, useless at the 6 th week of life.

- The development of non-toxic adjuvants in vaccines, such as calcium phosphate which is harmless, with some scientific evidence of the toxicity of aluminum being established.

Only at this price will vaccine confidence be restored in our country.

Feel free to broadcast this CALL REASON to all health personnel among your acquaintances.

They too must be protected to remain at the service of their patients.

With our thanks,

Pr Luc Montagnier
Pr Henri Joyeux

[1] Concentrations of granulocyte colony-stimulation in human milk after in vitro simulations of digestion. DA Calhoun, Lunoe M, Du Du Y, Staba SL, Christensen RD. Pediatr Res 1999; 46 (6): 767-71.

- Breastfeeding Provides passive and active Likely long-lasting immunity. THE Hanson. Ann All Asthma Immunol 1998; 81 (6): 523-33.

[2] Court of Justice of the European Union, Case C-621/15, "NW and Others v. Sanofi Pasteur MSD SNC and Others", judgment of 21 June 2017.

[3] Pneumococcus, 91%; hepatitis B, 88%; MMR, 78%, meningococcal C, 70%.

[4] http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/D...-polyomyelitis

[5] https://30ansplustard.wordpress.com/...pment-project/

[6] Thomas Dietrich, " Healthy Democracy, Lost Illusions ", contribution to the report of the General Inspectorate of Social Affairs on the leadership of democracy in health within the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health handed 19 February 2016.

[7] Aluminum in brain tissue in autism - Matthew Mold a , Dorcas Umar b , Andrew King c , Christopher Exley a - Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology - - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb. 2017.11.012

- Non-linear dose-response of aluminum hydroxide adjuvant particles: Selective low dose neurotoxicity - Gu. & all - Toxicology Jan.2017 Vol: 375, Page: 48-57

[8] Vascellari M, Melchiotti E, Bozza MA, Mutinelli F. Fibrosarcomas at presumed sites of injection in dogs: characteristics and comparison with non-vaccination site fibrosarcomas and feline post-vaccinal fibrosarcomas . J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 Aug; 50 (6): 286-91.

[9] World-class work explained with all the scientific references in his book " Toxic Story " - Ed Actes-Sud 2017.

[10] We speak of " cytokine storm ", a cytokine storm or thunderstorm!

[11] Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2005-2015. - Haber P 1 , Moro PL 2 , Ng C 2 , Lewis PW 2 , Hibbs B 2 , Schillie SF 3 , Nelson NP 3 , Li R 2 , Stewart B 4 , Cano MV 2 . Vaccinated. 2017 Dec 11.pi .: S0264-410X (17) 31722-X. doi: 10.1016 / j.vaccine.2017.11.079. [Epub ahead of print]

[12] American Academy of Neurology, 34th Annual Meeting, Apr. 25-May 1, 1982. Neurology 32 (4): pt.2).

[13] Infanrix hexa and sudden death: a review of the periodic safety update reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency- Jacob Puliyel, C Sathyamala - Indian Journal of Medical Ethics - DOI: 10.20529 / IJME.2017.079

[14] Aluminum in brain tissue in autism - Christopher Exley, Andrew King, Matthew Mold and Dorcas Umar, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology , vol. 46, Elsevier, Amsterdam, March 2018 (Online since 26 November 2017).

[15] See for example recently in the press: https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/po...rt-se-shut-off -the law-the-disarray-of-parent-refractory-to-new-vaccines-obligatoires_2536671.html

[16] How to make teaching around the vaccine? ", News and Dossier in Public Health Daniel Floret, No. 71, High Council of Public Health, Paris, June 2010.google translated french to english

[James Newell]

I remember a while back refusing a Flu shot at the VA hospital. I told the polite nurse, "No thanks, I don't need mercury and other stuff in me from that shot." The nurse said, " I have to ask, its orders, and quietly, "Don't tell anyone I don't take them either."

[onawah]

Can you please post a link for that awesome article Delight? Thanks!

Posted by Delight (here)
Concern expressed in 2018 over French legal mandate for vaccination.

[Delight]

Posted by onawah (here)
Can you please post a link for that awesome article Delight? Thanks!

Posted by Delight (here)
Concern expressed in 2018 over French legal mandate for vaccination.

Hi! Click on the blue statement at the bottom that article is google translated. But here is the French link

https://www.11vaccinsobligatoires.co...joyeux/script/

I am glad to see different people concerned about the political aspect of vaccination. The moderator is horrified about mandates. He asks good questions.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NZComwzwJg4

This is talking about genocide... but determining who gets to kill whom.

I am really weirded out by the abortion/ vaccine dichotomy. When my mother was young, a single woman was shunned by her social group for pregnancy (upper middle class of her town).

IMO IF the environment supported ALL MOTHERS and babies as a collective joyous celebration AND responsibility, no one would want to abort. The truth is only babies born in certain circumstances are fully supported IMO. There have always been abortion/infantacides and when abortion became legal and safe, that was a step forward and then so many women were empowered to have babies without "marriage".

I don't know what we should do REALLY but I feel we are slipping into a pit.
Why cannot we realize that only by elevating the whole perspective will we see a solution.

Religion is often the glove on right hand of the control and politics the left glove. The gloved hands throttle the populace with its mental propaganda, emotional threats of shunning and physical constraint when politics and religion align.

[Delight]

Posted by James Newell (here)
I remember a while back refusing a Flu shot at the VA hospital. I told the polite nurse, "No thanks, I don't need mercury and other stuff in me from that shot." The nurse said, " I have to ask, its orders, and quietly, "Don't tell anyone I don't take them either."

I read on facebook group "Stop Mandatory Vaccines" that the veteran benefits might be tied to vaccination? The propaganda is ramping up for the full scale push for all adults IMO.

Vaccines aren’t just for kids: Why it’s important for adults to keep up with their immunizations
by Terri Akman, For the Inquirer, Updated: May 30, 2019- 7:00 AM

With my first grandchild due in a matter of weeks, I knew I had to be current on my own vaccinations because the baby couldn’t receive immunizations for some time to come. The very last thing any grandparent wants is to introduce so much as a sniffle to the nursery.

I had recently had my flu shot and Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis) booster. I had read reports about the rise in pertussis (or whooping cough) cases linked with waning effectiveness of the vaccine. I also know that pertussis may be a bad cough for some sufferers, but it can be deadly for infants.

With so much news about mumps and measles outbreaks across the nation, I had new concerns. Approaching my 60th birthday, I suspected I had the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) vaccine as a kid, but wasn’t positive. I also wondered whether the measles portion of the vaccine could have worn off over the years, as research has shown.

I emailed my doctor’s office and the nurse responded that they didn’t have a record of me having the MMR vaccine, so I could get an antibody blood test that would show whether I was immune to measles. But, she warned, the test would likely not be covered by insurance. A call to Quest, the lab where I get my blood work, revealed that the antibody test would cost me $136.10. Ouch!

After some digging, I found my childhood immunization records that my mother had actually saved. Remember, way back when, before electronic records, that folded white card on which our parents handwrote the date of each vaccine? Sure enough, next to measles: 1963.

But that didn’t mean I was immune. Between 1963 and 1967, roughly one million people were immunized with the so-called killed measles vaccine, which was later found to be ineffective, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (Those who got the weakened “live” measles vaccine during that time are likely protected.) My record doesn’t show which vaccine I received.

“The recommendation was that if you were born during that time, you should get a second immunization to ensure that folks have the protective immunity against measles, mumps and rubella,” said Ian Frank, professor of medicine in the infectious diseases division at the University of Pennsylvania.

And, I learned, I didn’t have to bother with the antibody test.

“There's no harm in just getting the immunization as long as someone doesn't have a compromised immune system,” said Frank.

To be safe, I’m going to get a booster shot.

Vaccine insurance coverage
I am not alone in my concern. My doctor, Nancy Beggs, professor of medicine at Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, said she’s getting more calls than usual with questions about vaccines. And insurance companies are reporting more questions on whether vaccines are covered.

“We have seen a considerable increase in the number of calls we’ve received where members are asking about vaccines or immunizations,” said Ginny Calega, vice president of medical affairs at Independence Blue Cross.

According to the CDC, all Health Insurance Marketplace plans (those governed by the rules of the Affordable Care Act) and most other private insurance plans must cover certain vaccines without charging a copayment or coinsurance when provided by an in-network provider. This is true even for patients who have not met a yearly deductible. Doses, recommended ages, and recommended populations for vaccinations vary. If in doubt, call your insurer.

The danger of adults’ not getting vaccinated
A lot of people associate vaccinations with childhood, when guidelines call for shots starting at age 2 months and continuing through adolescence. So adults may not realize how important it is for them to keep up with their own immunizations.

“Often, healthy folks who don’t have any medical condition may not be seeing a primary-care provider,” Frank said. “It’s worth having a primary-care provider, if for no other reason than to make sure that you have gotten all of the vaccines that would potentially benefit you.”

ADVERTISEMENT
The guidelines continually change, Beggs said. “The purpose of a prevention visit with your health-care provider is to review health-care recommendations according to age, risk factors, and preference,” she said. “A discussion should include an overview of vaccinations, screening tests, and counseling designed to maintain good health and to prevent potential problems.”

Failing to protect yourself also puts others at risk, Frank said. “For the most part, these are infections that can be spread by a respiratory route or through sexual contact, so the more people that are protected, the less likely we are to see cases spread in the community,” he said.

He’s seen his share of heartbreak that could have been prevented.

“I have done infectious disease consults on young, healthy pregnant women – one who died of the flu and two cases where individuals had to be hooked up to an ECMO machine, that bypasses the lungs to deliver sufficient oxygen.”

ADVERTISEMENT
And while pregnancy is a time when alcohol and many drugs are off limits to women, flu shots are definitely recommended.

Your vaccine shopping list
The CDC recommends that all healthy adults (age 19 and older) have the following vaccines:

MMR if you were born before 1957 or don’t have immunity to measles, mumps and/or rubella. The mumps portion of the vaccine is not as durable as the others – that’s probably why we saw the recent outbreak at Temple University among people who had been immunized in the past. But there’s no harm in getting an MMR booster, according to the CDC. (By the way, a booster shot is no different from the regular shot.)
Flu shot to protect against influenza viruses. Get one annually.
Tdap if you did not receive it as an adolescent to protect against pertussis, and then a Td (tetanus, diphtheria) booster shot every 10 years. The CDC advises that for those of us caring for infants, it might be easier just to get another Tdap shot, but ask your doctor.
HPV to protect against the human papillomavirus that causes most cervical cancers, anal cancer, many head/neck cancers, and genital warts. The CDC guidelines recommend it up to age 26 for girls and women as well as males who are gay or bisexual, or have a compromised immune system. For other males, the series of two shots is recommended to age 21. But last October, the Food and Drug Administration expanded its recommendation to men and women up to age 45. Frank agrees with the new recommendation. “I recommend it because it does decrease the likelihood that women will have evidence of cervical changes that are precancerous,” he said. “Also, we’re seeing an increase in the number of men, in particular, who get head and neck cancer caused by HPV.”
Older adults should have two additional vaccines according to the CDC:

The shingles vaccine to protect against complications from the disease that can arise in anyone who has ever had chickenpox. Both a single-dose and a two-dose vaccine are available, but the CDC says GSK’s two-dose Shingrix vaccine is preferred for adults over 50 because it is more than 90 percent effective. It is sometimes in short supply, so call before you go.
The single-dose pneumococcal vaccine to protect against the disease, including infections in the lungs and bloodstream (recommended for all adults over 65 years old, and for adults younger than 65 years who have certain chronic health conditions). Some doctors suggest periodic boosters of the pneumococcal vaccine for certain patients.
There are additional vaccines, including Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B that may be warranted for certain individuals, for example, if you are pregnant or travel internationally. Talk to your doctor about your specific needs.
Posted: May 30, 2019 - 7:00 AM
Terri Akman, For the Inquirer

[Delight]

The hygiene theory is gaining evidence. True Science empowers us.

Healthy fat hidden in dirt may fend off anxiety disorders
Neuroscience NewsNEUROSCIENCE NEWSMAY 29, 2019
FEATUREDNEUROSCIENCEPSYCHOLOGY



Summary: 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid, a fatty acid found in the soil based bacterium Mycobacterium vaccae, interacts with immune cells to inhibit pathways that drive inflammation and increases resilience to stress. Researchers say the findings could bring us one step closer to developing a microbe-based “stress vaccine”.

Source: University of Colorado at Boulder

Thirty years after scientists coined the term “hygiene hypothesis” to suggest that increased exposure to microorganisms could benefit health, University of Colorado Boulder researchers have identified an anti-inflammatory fat in a soil-dwelling bacterium that may be responsible.

The discovery, published Monday in the journal Psychopharmacology, may at least partly explain how the bacterium, Mycobacterium vaccae, quells stress-related disorders. It also brings the researchers one step closer to developing a microbe-based “stress vaccine.”

“We think there is a special sauce driving the protective effects in this bacterium, and this fat is one of the main ingredients in that special sauce,” said senior author and Integrative Physiology Professor Christopher Lowry.

British scientist David Strachan first proposed the controversial “hygiene hypothesis” in 1989, suggesting that in our modern, sterile world, lack of exposure to microorganisms in childhood was leading to impaired immune systems and higher rates of allergies and asthma.

Researchers have since refined that theory, suggesting that it is not lack of exposure to disease-causing germs at play, but rather to “old friends” – beneficial microbes in soil and the environment – and that mental health is also impacted.

“The idea is that as humans have moved away from farms and an agricultural or hunter-gatherer existence into cities, we have lost contact with organisms that served to regulate our immune system and suppress inappropriate inflammation,” said Lowry, who prefers the phrases ‘old friends hypothesis’ or ‘farm effect.’ “That has put us at higher risk for inflammatory disease and stress-related psychiatric disorders.”

Lowry has published numerous studies demonstrating a link between exposure to healthy bacteria and mental health.

One showed that children raised in a rural environment, surrounded by animals and bacteria-laden dust, grow up to have more stress-resilient immune systems and may be at lower risk of mental illness than pet-free city dwellers.

Others have shown that when a particular bacterium, Mycobacterium vaccae, is injected into rodents, it alters the animals’ behavior in a way similar to that of antidepressants and has long-lasting anti-inflammatory effects on the brain. Studies suggest exaggerated inflammation boosts risk of trauma- and stressor-related disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

One recent Lowry-authored study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2017, showed that injections of M. vaccae prior to a stressful event could prevent a “PTSD-like” syndrome in mice, fending off stress-induced colitis and making the animals act less anxious when stressed again later.

“We knew it worked, but we didn’t know why,” said Lowry. “This new paper helps clarify that.”

For the new study, Lowry and his team identified, isolated and chemically synthesized a novel lipid, or fatty acid, called 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid found in Mycobacterium vaccae and used next-generation sequencing techniques to study how it interacted with macrophages, or immune cells, when the cells were stimulated.

They discovered that inside cells, the lipid acted like a key in a lock, binding to a specific receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), and inhibiting a host of key pathways which drive inflammation. They also found that when cells were pre-treated with the lipid they were more resistant to inflammation when stimulated.

“It seems that these bacteria we co-evolved with have a trick up their sleeve,” said Lowry. “When they get taken up by immune cells, they release these lipids that bind to this receptor and shut off the inflammatory cascade.”

Lowry has long envisioned developing a “stress vaccine” from M. vaccae, which could be given to first responders, soldiers and others in high-stress jobs to help them fend off the psychological damage of stress.

“This is a huge step forward for us because it identifies an active component of the bacteria and the receptor for this active component in the host,” he said.

Simply knowing the mechanism of action by which M. vaccae reaps benefits could boost confidence in it as a potential therapeutic. And if further studies show the novel fat alone has therapeutic effects, that molecule could become a target for drug development, he said.

This shows a man with dirty hands
Researchers have since refined that theory, suggesting that it is not lack of exposure to disease-causing germs at play, but rather to “old friends” – beneficial microbes in soil and the environment – and that mental health is also impacted. The image is adapted from the University of Colorado at Boulder news release.

Overall, the study offers further proof that our “old friends” have a lot to offer.

“This is just one strain of one species of one type of bacterium that is found in the soil but there are millions of other strains in soils,” Lowry said. “We are just beginning to see the tip of the iceberg in terms of identifying the mechanisms through which they have evolved to keep us healthy. It should inspire awe in all of us.”

ABOUT THIS NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH ARTICLE
Source:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Media Contacts:
Lisa Marshall – University of Colorado at Boulder
Image Source:
The image is adapted from the University of Colorado at Boulder news release.

Original Research: Closed access
“Identification and characterization of a novel anti-inflammatory lipid isolated from Mycobacterium vaccae, a soil-derived bacterium with immunoregulatory and stress resilience properties”. David G. Smith, Roberta Martinelli, Gurdyal S. Besra, Petr A. Illarionov, Istvan Szatmari, Peter Brazda, Mary A. Allen, Wenqing Xu, Xiang Wang, László Nagy, Robin D. Dowell, Graham A. W. Rook, Laura Rosa Brunet, Christopher A. Lowry.
Psychopharmacology. doi:10.1007/s00213-019-05253-9

Abstract

Identification and characterization of a novel anti-inflammatory lipid isolated from Mycobacterium vaccae, a soil-derived bacterium with immunoregulatory and stress resilience properties

Rationale
Mycobacterium vaccae (NCTC 11659) is an environmental saprophytic bacterium with anti-inflammatory, immunoregulatory, and stress resilience properties. Previous studies have shown that whole, heat-killed preparations of M. vaccae prevent allergic airway inflammation in a murine model of allergic asthma. Recent studies also demonstrate that immunization with M. vaccae prevents stress-induced exaggeration of proinflammatory cytokine secretion from mesenteric lymph node cells stimulated ex vivo, prevents stress-induced exaggeration of chemically induced colitis in a model of inflammatory bowel disease, and prevents stress-induced anxiety-like defensive behavioral responses. Furthermore, immunization with M. vaccae induces anti-inflammatory responses in the brain and prevents stress-induced exaggeration of microglial priming. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying anti-inflammatory effects of M. vaccae are not known.

Objectives
Our objective was to identify and characterize novel anti-inflammatory molecules from M. vaccae NCTC 11659.

Methods
We have purified and identified a unique anti-inflammatory triglyceride, 1,2,3-tri [Z-10-hexadecenoyl] glycerol, from M. vaccae and evaluated its effects in freshly isolated murine peritoneal macrophages.

Results
The free fatty acid form of 1,2,3-tri [Z-10-hexadecenoyl] glycerol, 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid, decreased lipopolysaccharide-stimulated secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 ex vivo. Meanwhile, next-generation RNA sequencing revealed that pretreatment with 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid upregulated genes associated with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) signaling in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages, in association with a broad transcriptional repression of inflammatory markers. We confirmed using luciferase-based transfection assays that 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid activated PPARα signaling, but not PPARγ, PPARδ, or retinoic acid receptor (RAR) α signaling. The effects of 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated secretion of IL-6 were prevented by PPARα antagonists and absent in PPARα-deficient mice.

Conclusion
Future studies should evaluate the effects of 10(Z)-hexadecenoic acid on stress-induced exaggeration of peripheral inflammatory signaling, central neuroinflammatory signaling, and anxiety- and fear-related defensive behavioral responses.

[onawah]

Talking Trash About Parents at the World Health Assembly 2019
by Barbara Loe Fisher
Published May 30, 2019
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/...assembly-2019/

"More than 4,000 representatives from 194 member states gathered in Geneva, Switzerland during May 20-28, 2019 to discuss human-related health issues at the 72nd World Health Assembly, a meeting of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) top decision-making body.1 On the second day of the meeting, the U.S. and 14 other governments sponsored an event “Promoting Vaccine Confidence: Embracing Global Immunization Efforts to Protect the Health of All Generations,” at which doctors and government execs in powerful positions railed against parents questioning vaccine safety and opposing “no exceptions” mandatory use of government recommended vaccines.

Gavi Chief Says Vaccine Hesitancy is “A Contagious Disease”
According to Reuters, Dr. Seth Berkley, founder of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, Inc. and current CEO of Gavi Vaccine Alliance,2 said that “misinformation” about vaccines was not a freedom of speech issue and called on companies hosting online social media platforms to remove the information. “I remind people that this kills people,” said Berkley.3

Agency France Presse (AFP) published a story entitled “Fight vaccine hesitancy as a ‘contagious disease,’ UN meeting told.” According to AFP, Dr. Berkley described the “growing anti-vaccine movement in richer nations” this way:

It’s a contagious disease,” Seth Berkley, who heads the GAVI Vaccine Alliance told AFP, warning that misinformation about vaccine safety “spreads at the speed of light.4

Before becoming the head of Gavi in 2011, Dr. Berkley worked for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Rockefeller Foundation, the Carter Center and served on the Boards of Vaxinnate Corp, Napo Pharmaceuticals and Powderjet Pharmaceuticals.5 6 In 2016, he and other Gavi executives were criticized in an investigative media report in the United Kingdom for taking excessively high salary packages.7

On Oct. 16, 2018 at the World Health Summit in Berlin, he announced that 11 heads of the world’s leading health and development organizations had signed a “landmark commitment” to find news ways to accelerate achieving the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals. He related the UN’s broader sustainable development goals to Gavi’s goal of delivering vaccines to all children.8

Two months later, Dr. Berkley told CNN that “while measles is one of the few diseases we could potentially eradicate, that will never happen if wealthy countries like the United States can’t maintain herd immunity. Because a measles case anywhere is a threat everywhere.” He suggested that parents who don’t vaccinate their children are selfish. “In countries like the United States we need to stop thinking about vaccination as something you only do to protect the one you love, and instead view it also as a goodwill act for the benefit of others.9

U.S. Government, Gates Foundation Biggest Donors to Gavi & WHO
Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance is a public-private partnership established by the WHO and U.S. government with funding provided in 2000 by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation “to improve access to new and underused vaccines for children living in the world’s poorest countries.”10 Gavi serves as a multilateral funding mechanism for purchase and delivery of vaccines involving the WHO, governments, the vaccine industry, World Bank, philanthropic foundations and civil society groups.11

Since 2000, more than $15B has been raised by Gavi to vaccinate the world’s children. The U.S. government has contributed about $1.9B to Gavi and the Gates Foundation is the largest private donor.12

The U.S. government is the largest state member funder of WHO. The Gates Foundation is the largest non-state funder of the WHO, having donated more than $2B in earmarked grants to the international health agency since 1998. Because the Gates Foundation grant money is earmarked for specific programs, such as vaccine purchase, delivery and promotion, the Gates Foundation significantly influences the setting of WHO’s program priorities. 13

U.S. Health Secretary Targets ‘Social Media Conspiracy Groups’
At the vaccine promotion event co-sponsored by the U.S. government at the World Assembly Meeting in Geneva, AFP reported that former Eli Lilly executive and current U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar II, JD14 said, “In my country, social media conspiracy groups confuse well-meaning parents so they hesitate to get the recommended vaccinations.”

According to the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), Azar also highlighted “ongoing US investments aimed at boosting vaccination coverage globally,” such as technical assistance provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to support vaccination campaigns in low-income countries and research on new vaccines for Ebola and HIV funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).15

Vaccine “Misinformation” Breeds Distrust and Destabilization of Governments?
IDSA reported some speakers suggested that, “misinformation about vaccines can also breed mistrust of governments that are promoting vaccination. Such mistrust can destabilize governments with major global ramifications.” Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam reportedly told attendees that public education must establish the status of vaccination as a “social norm,” ensuring that public discourse is not dominated by vaccine opponents.16

Unsafe Hospital Care: 134M Adverse Events & 2.6M Deaths
Despite the highly publicized vaccine promotion event demonizing parents pushing back against enforcement of one-size-fits-all vaccine policies and laws, the World Health Assembly attendees identified far more pressing global health problems like universal health coverage,17 anti-microbial resistance,18 non-communicable diseases,19 greater transparency for pricing of drugs and vaccines,20 and sanitation and patient safety.21

The World Health Assembly attendees recognized patient safety and reducing patient harm in healthcare settings as a key priority, and endorsed the establishment of an annual World Patient Safety Day, pointing out that:

Patient harm due to adverse events is one of the leading causes of death and disability globally. An estimated 134 million adverse events occur annually due to unsafe care are in hospitals in low and middle income countries, contributing to 2.6 million deaths, while 1 in 10 patients is estimated to be harmed while receiving hospital care in high income countries.22

An estimated 15 percent of patients in the world develop one or more infections during a hospital stay, with those living in low-income countries at greatest risk. Member states agreed to a new resolution to improve safe water, sanitation and hygiene in health facilities around the world to prevent the spread of infections and reduce maternal and newborn deaths. Reportedly, one in four healthcare facilities lacks basic water services and one in five have no sanitation services, which affects 2 billion people.

WHO Developing New Global Vaccine Action Plan
The WHO is the world’s largest and most influential public health agency with an annual budget for 2018-2019 of $4421.5M ($4.4 billion).23 The biggest individual programs funded by WHO have been for polio eradication vaccine campaigns ($903M); vaccine campaigns for other communicable diseases ($805M); and corporate services/enabling functions ($715.5M).

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, PhD, who was Ethiopia’s Minister of Health and then Minister of Foreign Affairs before being elected WHO Director-General in 2017,24 told attendees at the World Health Assembly meeting in Geneva that, “WHO is working to ensure vaccines reach more countries than ever before. Vaccination is a right and a shared responsibility.”25

A new Global Vaccine Action Plan is being developed by WHO,26 which will be presented at the meeting of the World Health Assembly 2020. Emphasis is being placed on integrating vaccination programs into wider national health systems to provide every child and adult in the world with vaccinations throughout life as part of a life-long primary healthcare plan.

This article or commentary provides referenced information and perspective on a topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics being discussed in public forums and by U.S. lawmakers. The websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide information and perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking."

References:1 Devdiscourse. Health for All: World Health Assembly 2019 Starts in Geneva. May 20, 2019.
2 Gavi The Vaccine Alliance. Seth Berkely, Gavi Chief Executive Officer. Gavi 2019.
3 Miles T. Vaccine doubts spread like disease, must be taken offline: vaccine chief. Reuters May 21, 2019.
4 Larson N. Fight vaccine hesitancy as ‘contagious disease,’ UN meeting told. Agency France Presse May 21, 2019.
5 Seth F. Berkley. Bloomberg Accessed May 29, 2019.
6 Vaxinnate Corp. Wellcome Trust Leads Round – Emerging Swine Flu Among Targets for Development of Novel Vaccines. Business Wire May 6, 2009.
7 Birrell I. The fattest charity fat cat of them all: Foreign aid boss has made MILLIONS out of the £1.5billion handed to his charity by British taxpayers. Daily Mail Dec. 31, 2016.
8 Berkley S. Global health organisations commit to new ways of working together for greater impact. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance Oct. 16, 2018.
9 Berkley S. Getting Your Child Vaccinated Is A Gift to Others. CNN Dec. 30, 2018.
10 Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. Gavi’s mission.
11 Fisher BL. WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots? NVIC Newsletter Jan. 27, 2019.
12 Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. The United States Government and the World Health Organization. May 14, 2018.
13 Martens J, Seitz K. Philanthropic Power and Development: Who Shapes the Agenda? The entry of the Gates Foundation into the global health arena. The Global Policy Forum November 2015.
14 DHHS. Alex M. Azar II. Jan. 29, 2019.
15 Jezek A. World Health Assembly 2019: Health leaders confront impacts of global vaccine barriers. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) May 21, 2019.
16 Ibid.
17 WHO. World Health Assembly Update 22 May 2019.
18 WHO. World Health Assembly Update, 23 May 2019 – Antimicrobial resistance.
19 WHO. World Health Assembly Update, 24 May 2019.
20 WHO. World Health Assembly Update, 28 May 2019.
21 WHO. World Health Assembly Update, 25 May 2019.
22 Ibid.
23 WHO. Programme Budget 2018-2019. Approved by Seventieth World Health Assembly May 26, 2017.
24 WHO. Biography of Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. 2019.
25 Jezek A. World Health Assembly 2019: Health leaders confront impacts of global vaccine barriers. Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) May 21, 2019
26 WHO. Immunization Today and In the Next Decade: Developing together the vision and strategy for immunization 2021-2030. Draft Zero for co-creation by June 14, 2019.

[Delight]

This is so ominous and so obvious. The social norm is that we should just accept whatever we are asked to do because it suits "our" government. I cannot imagine a world that sees itself as the masters and we the servants in this way.

Vaccine “Misinformation” Breeds Distrust and Destabilization of Governments?
IDSA reported some speakers suggested that, “misinformation about vaccines can also breed mistrust of governments that are promoting vaccination. Such mistrust can destabilize governments with major global ramifications.” Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Theresa Tam reportedly told attendees that public education must establish the status of vaccination as a “social norm,” ensuring that public discourse is not dominated by vaccine opponents.16

Del Bigtree today breaking down the recent hit piece from Aljazeera

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=N56Np2cqSp0

and I do really appreciate Robert Scott Bell's show daily.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3OJN75kpYzc

[Delight]

It would really be great if people could see the implications of the propaganda that mandatory vaccination MUST BECOME the social norm.

Tokyo – February 26, 2014
Macrophagic myofasciitis
New insights on the long-term safety
of aluminum adjuvants
FJ AUTHIER
Reference Center for Neuromuscular Diseases GNMH,
Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France

By pixieforest1
Posted Thursday, May 30, 2019

If Japan can have a public and honest debate about vaccines, why can’t we have that same debate here in Australia?

The Japanese Ministry of Health secretly planned a visit to London for sometime in October 2013 to have discussions on the HPV vaccines with officials in the UK Department of Health and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). This delegation also wanted to speak with scientific and medical experts who were independent of pharmaceutical industry conflicts of interest.

A one Mr. Tetsuya Miyamoto, Director of the Office of Vaccination Policy at the Ministry of Health led that secret mission to get ALL the information about the HPV vaccine.

There had been a spate of very nasty HPV vaccine adverse reactions in Japanese girls and their government was determined to find out if the vaccine was in fact harming those girls.

The Japanese symposium and debate was organized in a very short time frame on behalf of ‘The Researchers Organization Sounding a Warning concerning the Adverse Reactions induced by Human Papillomavirus Vaccines’ through the collaborative efforts of Dr. Harumi Sakai, former Professor at the Tokai University School of Medicine, Dr. Shohei Matsuzaki, Professor Emeritus at the Tokai University School of Medicine, Mutsuo Fukushima, Kyoto News International Department, and SaneVax Inc.

Professor Authier was one of the medical experts that the Japanese delegation spoke to. He consequently testified at the Japanese HPV public hearing, the meeting with the Japanese Senators and at news conferences. The following is his conclusion at the end of his testimony research paper titled, ‘Macrophagic myofasciitis New insights on the long-term safety of aluminum adjuvants’ …

“Neuromigration of alum particles is an active process’

Alum particles can be transported by monocyte-lineage cells to lymph nodes, blood and spleen, and, similarly to HIV, may use MCP1/CCL2- dependent mechanisms to penetrate the brain. This occurs at a very low rate in normal conditions explaining good overall tolerance of alum despite its strong neurotoxic potential.- However, continuously escalating doses of the poorly biodegradable alum adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in case of overimmunization
or immature/altered blood brain barrier
or high constitutive CCL-2 production.”
Authier is also a co-author of a research paper that states, “Nanomaterials can be transported by monocyte-lineage cells to DLNs, blood and spleen, and, similarly to HIV, may use CCL2-dependent mechanisms to penetrate the brain. This occurs at a very low rate in normal conditions explaining good overall tolerance of alum despite its strong neurotoxic potential. However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier or high constitutive CCL-2 production”

References
‘Macrophagic myofasciitis New insights on the long-term safety of aluminum adjuvants’ http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/05-Shingi...0000038475.pdf (as accessed 30 June 2018).REF – ‘Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain’ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23557144

‘Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain’ BMC Medicine 201311:99 https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-99 (as accessed 16 May 2019).

[Delight]

James Corbett explains how the Eugenics movement (intention to sterilize and limit the poor population and increase the population of the rich) changed it's nomenclature to "climate change debate" but that it is still the same intention....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SykwLpCpo7A

Issues analysis
The inconvenient truth about vaccines
by Stefani Williams
April 4, 2019

"Skepticism is the first step towards truth," Denis Diderot, 1746.

Has our government ever been wrong? Has it ever been deceptive? The answer of course, to anyone who knows our history, is yes! Here are a few examples:

Forced sterilization and eugenics

History is fraught with the horrors that eugenics inflicted on the world. The most prominent example is, of course, Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany, but what isn't well known is that Hitler was actually influenced by eugenics-inspired policies implemented in the United States during the early part of the 1900's. Eugenics is the belief that in order to "improve" the human species, only people with "desirable" traits should be allowed to reproduce. This philosophy was responsible for the forced sterilization, perpetuated by the U.S. government, of thousands of "unfit" or "socially inadequate" Americans.

Toxic chemicals in Vietnam

From 1962 to 1975, tens of thousands of U.S. military personnel were exposed to the toxic herbicide Agent Orange, while serving in Vietnam. Agent Orange was part of the U.S. military's warfare program, Operation Ranch Hand, and was used to eliminate forest cover and crops of the North Vietnamese army. Contamination by this toxic mix of chemicals has been linked to dozens of serious health problems in Vietnam veterans and continues to pollute portions of Vietnam where the chemicals were sprayed.

It took the U.S. government decades to finally admit that exposure to the chemical poisoned thousands of U.S. military personnel, after initially vilifying those who claimed they had been harmed by the substance.

An "ethically unjustified" study

Beginning in 1932 and ending in 1972, the U.S. government, in conjunction with the Tuskegee Institute, conducted a study called The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male. The study involved 600 African American men, 399 of which had syphilis and 201 did not. The purpose of the study was not to treat these men, but to observe the natural course of untreated syphilis. The participants were not told the purpose of the study. "In fact, the men had been misled," according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "and had not been given all the facts required to provide informed consent."

The study ended only when an Associated Press article, some 40 years after the study began, blew the whistle on what was going on. In 1973, a class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of the study participants and their families against the U.S. government, and in 1974, a $10 million out-of-court settlement was reached.

Living downwind

From 1945 to 1962, the U.S. military conducted nearly 200 atmospheric nuclear weapons development tests in or near Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. Radioactive contamination or nuclear fallout from these tests has affected the health of tens of thousands, if not more, American citizens. Most of these Downwinders, as they're called, were never warned prior to the testing of the deadly bombs – some only miles from their homes. Victims of this nuclear exposure have numerous forms of cancer and birth defects. Declassified government documents from 1978 to 1980 show that scientists knew in 1947 that fissions from atomic bomb tests were deadly to humans and animals exposed during and after the tests.

In 1962, many of the people who worked in nuclear weapons development and uranium mining and processing filed class action lawsuits against the government for damages resulting from deliberate concealment of the truth. These suits were dismissed by the appellate courts. It wasn't until 1990, when the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act was passed, that the government acknowledged its fault in exposing American citizens to radiation poisoning.

As we can see, our government is not always on the side of facts and truth, or free from instances of coverup for grievous sins.

This leads us to the topic of vaccinations.

Inconvenient truth

The vast majority of Americans agree that vaccinations save lives, and most people choose to vaccinate their children. Vaccinations have been embedded into our cultural psyche. The medical establishment and the CDC vouch time and again for the safety, effectiveness, and need for doctors and parents to rigorously follow the CDC's vaccination schedule.

But despite these assurances and instructions, not all of the medical community has lined up behind the CDC's directives. In fact, thousands of physicians are raising red flags as to the safety, efficacy, and even necessity of several vaccines in the CDC's immunization program.

According to the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: "Vaccines are neither 100% safe nor 100% effective. Nor are they the only available means to control the spread of disease."

AAPS further states, "There are many theoretical mechanisms for adverse effects from vaccines, especially in children with developing brains and immune systems. Note the devastating effects of Zika or rubella virus on developing humans, even though adults may have mild or asymptomatic infections. Many vaccines contain live viruses intended to cause a mild infection. Children's brains are developing rapidly – any interference with the complex developmental symphony could be ruinous."

The truth is there are thousands of people who have been injured by, or have even died from, vaccines. This isn't fringe thinking, it's fact. Many Americans are unaware that in 1986, Congress created a court called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) in the Department of Health and Human Services. Its sole purpose is to handle vaccine injury claims. The hearings are not open to the public, and Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers are tasked with defending the vaccine(s) in question (this is because Congress made the pharmaceutical companies that create vaccines exempt from litigation for faulty products).

To date, this court has awarded nearly $4 billion to vaccine injury victims.

It turns out, every vaccine administered sets aside a legal fee for anticipated damages. And it should also be pointed out that each vaccine has a disclaimer insert that lists risks and possible complications associated with the vaccine – although most people are never told this.

As we can see, vaccine injury occurs at an astounding rate. In fact, 1 in every 640 children given the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, for example, will suffer a seizure from it, compared to 1 of out every 3,200 children who contract measles itself. To further illustrate, from 2004 to 2015, more people died from MMR and other measles vaccines than died from the actual disease the vaccines are supposed to protect against. During this period, there was one death from measles (a woman in 2015, who was vaccinated). But in this same time interval, the MMR vaccine caused at least 108 (recorded) deaths.

The ramifications are shocking – and nearly hidden from public view. Consider that in a three month period alone, from November 2018 to February 2019, the U.S. government has awarded $110 million to vaccine injury victims. That's in the VICP's latest report, dated March 8, 2019 (source).

Forced vaccinations

With measles in the news again and with the media and CDC creating near hysteria over the disease "outbreak" (for a disease that used to be referred to as a "mild childhood infection" that almost everyone caught and recovered from), there is a nationwide push to completely do away with all but medical vaccine exemptions and also forcibly inoculate everyone, including adults, who have not already been vaccinated.

In early March, Congress held hearings on the subject called "Vaccines Save Lives: What is Driving Preventable Disease Outbreaks?" These hearings were one-sided in favor of the CDC and mandated vaccination. Not one dissenting voice was allowed to testify.

It is a form of censorship that scientifically-based dialogue about immunization hazards is being ignored and stifled in congressional hearings (as well as in state legislatures) – which should be a cause of great concern to all Americans.

Apprehension over the safety of vaccines is the overriding reason cited by those who don't vaccinate – or who vaccinate selectively. Another concern is the fact several vaccines are derived from the cultured cells of aborted fetuses – including the MMR and chickenpox vaccines.

But regardless of where you stand on vaccinations, we all ought to agree that no person should be forced to have a substance injected into his body or his child's body that he believes is harmful or morally objectionable.

Government-mandated vaccines are a grave concern to those of us who believe coerced vaccinations violate basic human rights and are therefore unconstitutional. "Serving the greater good" does not justify trampling on individual rights. Furthermore, mandating vaccines will open a pandora's box to a host of future infringements on our liberties; "then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the State can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow," said Barbara Loe Fisher, Co-Founder and President, National Vaccine Information Center.

The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential." The Nuremberg Trials, of course, were conducted in the aftermath of World War II when prominent members of the medical, political, military, judicial, and economic leadership of Hitler's Germany were tried for their participation in the Holocaust and other horrendous war crimes like forced experimentation on prisoners.

What we do about the safety, effectiveness, and need for vaccines should be open to national debate, not forced on us by the faceless few in the "Medical-Industrial Complex."

Corruption and lies

Because Congress has granted pharmaceutical companies complete legal immunity from lawsuits by vaccine injury victims, these companies have no incentive to improve their products – they have no accountability. Another problem with our current system is the enormous profit many employees within the CDC stand to make by increased vaccination production and distribution. Many members of the CDC own or share vaccine patents, a clear violation of ethics.

In December 2018, Congressman Mark Green (R-TN), who is also a doctor, raised the question of vaccine safety and dishonest practices within the CDC in a townhall meeting. He said:

"I have committed to people in my community...to stand on the CDC's desk and get the real data on vaccines, because there is some concern that the rise in autism is the result of the preservatives that are in our vaccines. As a physician, I can make that argument. There appears to be some evidence that as vaccine numbers increase, rates of autism increase. We need better research, and we need it fast. We also need complete transparency of any data. Vaccines are essential to good population health. But that does not mean we should not look closely at the correlation for any causation."

He also said it appears that some of the CDC's data has been "fraudulently managed," and it looks like he's right.

Recently, highly acclaimed pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman signed a sworn affidavit in which he states that while working for the CDC in 2007, he told DOJ lawyers that he had found "exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism. I explained that in a subset of children, vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder." According to Zimmerman, the CDC and DOJ ignored him and misrepresented his position on the autism / vaccine link.

Unconscionably, a 2004 CDC study that initially linked the MMR vaccine to the astronomical rate of autism among America's youth was intentionally altered to show that no significant connection exists. In 2013, the CDC's lead scientist involved in this study, Senior Scientist Dr. William Thompson, contacted biologist Dr. Brian Hooker, whose son is severely autistic, and "confessed that the CDC had omitted crucial data in their final report that revealed a causal relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism." Thompson then told Hooker that the CDC destroyed key data linking MMR to autism.

Why isn't this headline news and one of the biggest scandals of the century? Dr. Thompson is willing to testify before Congress but must first be subpoenaed in order to legally divulge the information he has since it comes from classified material. Congressman Bill Posey (R-FL) called on Congress to do just that in 2017, but his demand has fallen on deaf ears. You'd think that news of a CDC whistleblower claiming the CDC "cooked the books" regarding the MMR / autism link would be blasted from post to pillar in the media, but it hasn't received a sneeze.

It should be noted that, in an obvious conflict of interest, former CDC Chairman Julie L. Gerberding (2002-2009), who was Dr. Thompson's boss and who evidently played a role in the CDC coverup between autism and the MMR vaccine, upon leaving the CDC secured a high-level job in Merek – one of the nation's leading vaccine manufacturers and the producer of the MMR vaccine.

The bottom line

The science is not settled on vaccines, and it should surprise most of us to know that there has yet to be a full-scale, unbiased, double-blind placebo study conducted on the safety of any of the vaccines on the children's CDC schedule. Additionally, there has never been a full-scale study of vaccinated versus unvaccinated people.

Why? Could it be that vaccines are not the "cure-all" that they are purported to be?

Could it also be that "Congress is owned by pharma [vaccine manufacturers]," as Dr. Raeford Brown, a pediatric anesthesia specialist at the UK Kentucky Children's Hospital and chair of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Committee on Analgesics and Anesthetics, said recently?

He told Yahoo Finance in an article published March 13, 2019, that "the pharmaceutical industry pours millions of dollars into the legislative branch every single year. In 2016, they put $100 million into the elections. That's a ton of money.... Congress is getting paid to not hold pharma accountable."

Call your Congressman and demand answers. Nothing will change until Congress feels public pressure to clean up its act and offer greater oversight of the pharmaceutical industry and the CDC.

Just as importantly, contact your local legislators and encourage them to support vaccine measures that will protect individual liberties and conscience. Educate yourself on the dangers of the MMR and other vaccines and then provide the information you have to your legislators. If you are respectful and informed, they will be more likely to listen to you.

Do all you can to stop forced vaccinations and shed light on vaccine hazards. Our children's health and lives hang in the balance.

Stefani Williams is Deputy Chief of Staff of RenewAmerica

[Delight]

Episode 544 - Greg Wyatt
Jun 02, 2016
Caravan to Midnight
"Demons at my Doorstep" Greg Wyatt on board for an in depth discussion about vaccine induced eugenics.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RIDbzt8yRtg