Bill Ryan's personal Question-and-Answer thread. Pile it on. :)

[petra]

Posted by Ayt (here)

Posted by Valerie Villars (here)
I can't beat that. I only grew 2 inches.

My apologies for having missed that in this thread.

Seriously? So surprised to hear of others growing suddenly! (I was amazed to gain 1 inch, but never spoke of it to anyone.) Also, everything just suddenly healed for me. (sorry to derail thread)

This is the kind of thing that makes me love Project Avalon! We don't keep secrets.

[snoman]

Hello Bill,
Reading about your experience with someone who seemed slightly different from most humans, got me thinking on that moment in the Charles interview where you both acknowledge that he is not quite like other people. I did find his manner intriguing during the time I spent with him. Able to exert a charismatic energy.
What was it about him that you found 'different'?
Thanks

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by snoman (here)
Hello Bill,
Reading about your experience with someone who seemed slightly different from most humans, got me thinking on that moment in the Charles interview where you both acknowledge that he is not quite like other people. I did find his manner intriguing during the time I spent with him. Able to exert a charismatic energy.
What was it about him that you found 'different'?
Thanks

Well, he'd been formally trained in various ways to activate and utilize certain psychic abilities.

I suspect they're dormant, or partially active, in most or maybe all of us, of course. But awakening and harnessing them is the key.

[snoman]

Thank you Bill. Abilities that are easily lost too I concluded.

[happyuk]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by snoman (here)
Hello Bill,
Reading about your experience with someone who seemed slightly different from most humans, got me thinking on that moment in the Charles interview where you both acknowledge that he is not quite like other people. I did find his manner intriguing during the time I spent with him. Able to exert a charismatic energy.
What was it about him that you found 'different'?
Thanks

Well, he'd been formally trained in various ways to activate and utilize certain psychic abilities.

I suspect they're dormant, or partially active, in most or maybe all of us, of course. But awakening and harnessing them is the key.

Hi Bill one other slow-burning question I have (again!) about Charles.

I remember him in the video talking about the importance of having a good diet. His quote (from my admittedly fallible memory) was "well, you've seen my diet".

My apologies if this comes across as daft and superficial, but do you recall what it was that he ate? I would find this very interesting. Would I be correct in assuming Charles would have abstained from any kind of stimulants including tea, coffee and alcohol?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by happyuk (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by snoman (here)
Hello Bill,
Reading about your experience with someone who seemed slightly different from most humans, got me thinking on that moment in the Charles interview where you both acknowledge that he is not quite like other people. I did find his manner intriguing during the time I spent with him. Able to exert a charismatic energy.
What was it about him that you found 'different'?
Thanks

Well, he'd been formally trained in various ways to activate and utilize certain psychic abilities.

I suspect they're dormant, or partially active, in most or maybe all of us, of course. But awakening and harnessing them is the key.

Hi Bill one other slow-burning question I have (again!) about Charles.

I remember him in the video talking about the importance of having a good diet. His quote (from my admittedly fallible memory) was "well, you've seen my diet".

My apologies if this comes across as daft and superficial, but do you recall what it was that he ate? I would find this very interesting. Would I be correct in assuming Charles would have abstained from any kind of stimulants including tea, coffee and alcohol?

I'm afraid I absolutely don't know.

[gigawatt]

This is quite possibly the best thread EVER! Love the flow and thoughts.
Thank you for thinking this one up!

[scotslad]

What's your thoughts on the scientology auditing process and the process of unblocking/releasing negative emotions attached to previous life experiences. Do you think it can really help individuals, and have you been audited or do you get on or up the bridge at all by experiencing other scientology products/services? Should we stay away or embrace or spend our money on better and more effective alternatives?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by scotslad (here)
What's your thoughts on the scientology auditing process and the process of unblocking/releasing negative emotions attached to previous life experiences. Do you think it can really help individuals, and have you been audited or do you get on or up the bridge at all by experiencing other scientology products/services? Should we stay away or embrace or spend our money on better and more effective alternatives?

Many thanks... I've posted about this (in general) in posts #25, #365, and #371. They may all be worth reading on this complex and interesting subject.

• What's your thoughts on the scientology auditing process and the process of unblocking/releasing negative emotions attached to previous life experiences?
  
  Well, in expert and ethical hands (and the 'ethical and expert' bit is important!) it's extraordinarily effective, sometimes dramatically so.

• Do you think it can really help individuals?
  
  Absolutely. 100%. But (again!) it has to be properly done.

• Have you been audited or do you get on or up the bridge at all by experiencing other scientology products/services?
  
  I've only experienced auditing in the care of people very well trained in standard scientology processing (outside the Church, that is. That bit is important, too). There are a number of spin-offs and derivatives, which I really can't comment on as I've not experienced them.

• Should we stay away or embrace or spend our money on better and more effective alternatives?
  
  Well, all I can say is that my personal experience, which is extensive over 35 years, is that the investment can be considerable over time (in terms of time and money) — but then, most valuable things in life are just the same.
  
  I don't know of a more effective alternative. But it's rather like any helpful or remedial series of actions, applied to anything that needs improvement, enhancement, optimization or repair. Sometimes there are quick-fix options that do actually work, and there can be many ways of addressing a problem or question. It depends what the problem is. Sometimes, a deep-reaching permanent solution is the best thing to seek out.
  
  My own dictum about all this is that this is one of the very few this-lifetime investments — of any kind — that you can take with you into one's next lifetime. That has to be emphasized. In that sense, it's absolutely not superficial or lightweight in any sense, and (in my strong opinion and experience) could not be more profound or valuable.

[petra]

Hi Bill,
I didn't realize you'd been involved with Scientology so much, and I'm just wondering if you would agree, disagree, or have any comments on this statement I found on the Wiki page for Scientology & Hypnosis (ref link), which is sourced from L. Ron Hubbard's book titled "What is Scientology?"

I'm particularly interested the "putting people into a state of higher awareness" part.

The Church of Scientology's official position on hypnosis is that it is a dangerous and undesirable practice. Whereas hypnotism's goal is to place a person in "a state of lessened awareness (i.e. trance)", Scientology's stated goal is to put people into the opposite state - one of higher awareness.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by petra (here)
Hi Bill,
I didn't realize you'd been involved with Scientology so much, and I'm just wondering if you would agree, disagree, or have any comments on this statement I found on the Wiki page for Scientology & Hypnosis (ref link), which is sourced from L. Ron Hubbard's book titled "What is Scientology?"

I'm particularly interested the "putting people into a state of higher awareness" part.

The Church of Scientology's official position on hypnosis is that it is a dangerous and undesirable practice. Whereas hypnotism's goal is to place a person in "a state of lessened awareness (i.e. trance)", Scientology's stated goal is to put people into the opposite state - one of higher awareness.

Yes, I'd generally agree with that. Hypnosis (in my opinion) is never necessary.

[petra]

Quoted from Post #371:

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

• As some reading this may well understand (from their own experience!) Hubbard was certainly under attack almost ALL THE TIME, including from entities — which Scientology has all the processes and understanding needed to address and handle. But Hubbard himself never completed all the necessary research into entity handling. This is important to understand. That was continued and extended in the mid- to late-1980s by Bill Robertson, and is now complete.

Hi Bill, this part really stood out to me because of another part of "The Grail Message" material relates to occult training (found here). It is really stressed that occult training is NOT advisable, in any case.

I tend to agree with that, and the post above is kind of frightening in the respect of the research having been completed. I mean, what's the next step once research is completed? That's rhetorical...

It also stresses the "dangers" of hypnosis, which is the basis of my previous question and I'm happy to hear you'd have absolutely no need for hypnosis.

In regards to Mr. Hubbard being constantly under attack, I certainly think that's plausible. When I first came across Tom Montalk's moon phase correlations with attacks, I was kind of taken aback, because I did not notice any such correlation - I felt I was under attack ALL the time also (not so much anymore).

The moon phase correlation is totally suspicious, and I think this relates to what you're saying in Post #365 Question 3 in the respect that it can apply to some people, but not to others.

[anon]

Hi Bill,

Noticed you speaking against William Tompkins in another thread, but can't find any info elsewhere as to why you think he's not legit.

I'd be grateful if you could enlighten me as to your opinions on the fellow, and his story.

Thanks,

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by anon (here)
Hi Bill,

Noticed you speaking against William Tompkins in another thread, but can't find any info elsewhere as to why you think he's not legit.

I'd be grateful if you could enlighten me as to your opinions on the fellow, and his story.

Thanks,

Hi there, and a very warm welcome to the forum!

it's a good question, and I do understand why you'd be asking it. A similar question was asked in post #348 in this [long!] thread, and so maybe I can repeat my response here.

***

This interesting question was sent in by e-mail from a guest:

~~~

I was just introduced to William Tompkins after watching Kerry Cassidy interview him. He says that there is a Secret Space Program that has its roots going back many years to when he was part of the US Navy...a time when the Navy contracted with Northrop, TRW, and Lockheed Skunkworks... all of whom were working with a group of Nordic ETs to develop an anti-gravity vehicle capable of deep space and interstellar travel. He claims this led to the establishment of a secret Navy base on the dark side of the moon (where there were already existing Reptilian/Draco bases). And lastly, he goes on to say that Bill & Hillary Clinton, Obama, and GW Bush are all shape-shifted Reptilians... and that Trump is not a Reptilian.

In your opinion, Bill, is this nothing more than the delusional ramblings of a senile old man, a charlatan, a fake, all of the above... or is there some level of truth to any of this man's extreme claims?

~~~

My reply:There is a Secret Space Program, 100% for sure. Precisely how extensive it is, we can't be certain, but there are very, very probably already bases on the Moon and Mars. A friend I know recently talked to the Deputy Director of NASA, off-record, and was told that the 'Secret Space Program' was all military, and NASA had to put up and make do with 'hand-me-downs' that might be as much as 30 years old.

But Tompkins was exaggerating and embellishing, I feel certain of that. He knew some things, but his book (I read 100 pages of it, and could go no further) was dreadful. It was an embarrassment.

He was a draftsman: very gifted at making engineering drawings. And he did work at Douglas when he said he did, we know that. But he was NOT an engineer, and wouldn't have been a senior part of the design teams for anything: he didn't have the education or qualifications to do all the math that would be needed.

And the timescale he asserts is too early. No way could we have made aircraft-carrier size spaceships in the early 1950s, years before Sputnik. They would be so heavy they'd have to have been assembled in orbit, and that massive multi-launch infrastructure just didn't exist back then. (Now, or at any time after the 1980s, yes, for sure. Antigravity technology is now very well-understood and has been operational for decades. But NOT back in the early '50s.)

Some reported reptilian shape-shifting I firmly believe is very real. I do also believe that these beings have infiltrated some of our senior influential positions, in many areas, maybe not just in politics. This ties into the real, complex, and inter-dimensional nature of our reality, that we barely understand yet — if we understand it at all.

This may be the main reason full 'disclosure' is still a VERY long way off. Any revelation of what's actually going on would have to encompass these highly-strange but important areas, and the truth would be just too unacceptable and shocking — even to very well-aware and well-informed people.

[anon]

Okay thanks for that (your book links 404 btw). What are your opinions on Boyd Bushman?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by anon (here)
Okay thanks for that (your book links 404 btw). What are your opinions on Boyd Bushman?

Well, Boyd Bushman was a bone fide aviation engineer who worked for Lockheed Martin. He was a smart guy: no fake or flake. He'd been interviewed by David Sereda, back in 2010, and that very interesting video is here.

• https://youtube.com/watch?v=SODv9RfFZdQ

He was elderly even then. A few years later, he made his now rather infamous 'deathbed' video. That was released according to his instructions, shortly after he'd passed in August 2014. In the video, he showed photos of an ET being he said he'd been given — but unfortunately they were soon identified with certainty as being Walmart alien dolls.

That's a real shame. That discredited everything else he ever said — which may well have been someone's intention. I have no doubt Bushman was a sincere, highly intelligent man. But it looks like someone fooled him, and now of course that's what people remember.

David Sereda gave a good interview about Bushman here:

• https://youtube.com/watch?v=OhQGQoFAos8

...and his 'deathbed video' can be seen here.

• https://youtube.com/watch?v=xENuvTDnKa8

[anon]

Yes, I'm pretty much in agreement with you there, although nobody points out you can also buy alien grey doll/model/masks as proof they don't exist (and most of us know they do). I'm still undecided as to whether his workmates were having him on. Either way I've no doubt he was telling his own truth as he believed it at the time.

One thing that bothers me about his detractors, is that nobody's bothered to try and disprove his experiment, dropping high powered magnets squashed together off a tall building. They can get the magnets off Bob Lazar's online shop (and most of them can afford it).

What do you think about Edgar Fouche?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc1IrnEkH0g

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by anon (here)
Yes, I'm pretty much in agreement with you there, although nobody points out you can also buy alien grey doll/model/masks as proof they don't exist (and most of us know they do). I'm still undecided as to whether his workmates were having him on. Either way I've no doubt he was telling his own truth as he believed it at the time.

One thing that bothers me about his detractors, is that nobody's bothered to try and disprove his experiment, dropping high powered magnets squashed together off a tall building. They can get the magnets off Bob Lazar's online shop (and most of them can afford it).

I'd be pretty sure that all that HAS been replicated in black projects as long ago as the early-to-mid 1950s. This recent presentation by aerospace researcher Michael Schratt (talking to Richard Dolan) is really most interesting.

He shows clearly that there was co-ordinated, intensive, high-level research into gravity back then, in a wide array of institutions and universities. Then, suddenly, in round about 1955-56, everything went totally quiet, and none of this research was ever mentioned again.

• https://youtube.com/watch?v=58A14lJG9Fw

Posted by anon (here)
What do you think about Edgar Fouche?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc1IrnEkH0g

I doubt his account. I'm certain TR-3Bs are real — there have been way too many consistent, detailed sightings — but his account of the physics is very inadequate to account for what's been reported. Fouché stated that technology had been developed to reduce the mass of this enormous thing (a huge triangle, 600 ft to a side) by some 89%.

But that simply means that (e.g.) a craft weighing 30,000 tons (which is what a naval battleship weighs) would now only have the mass-equivalent of 3,300 tons.

That's still a heck of a lot, FAR heavier than the heaviest regular aircraft. So what makes it go from horizon to horizon in just a few seconds?

As an example, this giant thing, the canceled XB-70 Valkyrie, had a take-off weight of 270 tons. And it could only go at Mach 3.



So either Fouché's not smart enough to see the holes in his own info (and he never appears to) — or there's a bunch more information that either he doesn't know or has redacted, and he's just playing dumb, releasing just part of the story. Either way, there's something that's not quite right here.

[TomKat]

Bill,

Do you think there is a 100% human secret space program? Or is all of it alien-assisted?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by TomKat (here)
Bill,

Do you think there is a 100% human secret space program? Or is all of it alien-assisted?

Yes, I'd be pretty sure that the secret space program is an all-human (but maybe multinational) thing. No Chewbacca in the cockpit! But of course some, or maybe most, of the technology used might very well be alien-derived.