The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[mountain_jim]

The Star Trek Q was not a very evolved being ( at least in emotional maturity in my view), using his powers like a petulant child most of the time.

If the whole continuum existed and was like that, it would be no wonder our little world is in such bad shape these days.

[Ratszinger]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
The Star Trek Q was not a very evolved being ( at least in emotional maturity in my view), using his powers like a petulant child most of the time.

If the whole continuum existed and was like that, it would be no wonder our little world is in such bad shape these days.

He was a big kid but some think that is just how a god would act. Do as thou wilt!

[Ba-ba-Ra]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
The Star Trek Q was not a very evolved being ( at least in emotional maturity in my view), using his powers like a petulant child most of the time.

If the whole continuum existed and was like that, it would be no wonder our little world is in such bad shape these days.

I must admit, I've never watched Star Trek. Yesterday when I was trying to explain to a friend about the current Q Movement, he smiled and said: That sounds like star trek. Then, remembering what my husband told me about Gene Roddenberry I was intrigued, so this morning I googled Star Trek Q and found the video I posted.

My perspective when I watched, was different from yours Mt. Jim. The Q that came down, did some good things and also not so good. So, the Q Continuum on seeing the bad things took away his powers. Keep in mind this was a TV show. Not reality. They had to engage in drama to hold an audience.

But , was it based on some reality or just Roddenberry's imagination.

My purpose of my original post was to suggest that both of those scenarios were possibilities.

Is this Q Movement merely some Trekkie's form of amusement?

Or is it possible that Roddenberry taped into a Q Continuum who have now come to help?

Or none of the above. And it is a group of military people who have been fed up with what's happening and they selected the letter Q because of Q clearance, as we have discussed in earlier posts.

As we've discussed, Q seems to know things. Whoever or whatever, Q is encouraging us to research and find truths. From my standpoint that's forcing many to face facts and wake up.

I just thought it was a rather strange coincidence that Star Trek had introduced a Q Continuum and it was worth mentioning.

Make what you want of it or dismiss it. Life is a chose your own adventure.

[mountain_jim]

It's been 15-20 years since I saw these episodes, so my recollections were not meant that seriously. Thanks for reminding me the Continuum acted like Q's parents at times.

And I totally support the possibility that TV shows and movies sometimes contain versions of soft disclosure content - 2 I always think of:

Star Gate SG-1

One of the episodes even titled Disclosure

The US and Russia reveal Stargate Command and its operations to representatives of the other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0709072/

and another had a TV show within the show, giving campy disclosure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole_X-Treme!

"Wormhole X-Treme!" is an episode from Season 5 of the science fiction television series Stargate SG-1. The title also refers to a camp fictional science fiction series named Wormhole X-Treme!, a show-within-a-show that is portrayed in the episode. This was the 100th episode of Stargate SG-1, and as such was produced as a "special" episode laden with large numbers of in-jokes, cameo appearances, and heavy use of metafictional elements for comedic effect.

Close Encounters of the Third Kind

http://www.unacknowledged.info/close...ased-on-facts/

Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind Based on Facts?

Was Steven Spielberg's "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" more than just a sci-fi movie? Extraordinary information published on the Internet in 2005 by a "group of DIA insiders" gave rise to belief that the scenes showing the landing of an alien craft and the boarding of the craft by 12 human astronauts were based on true events.

Steven Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind hit the screens over thirty years ago and was Hollywood’s first block-buster about UFO sightings and extraterrestrial contact. Released in the same year as Star Wars it actually surpassed George Lucas’ movie in box-office revenue and alerted the wider public to the electrifying question – are we alone in the Universe? Although the movie belongs in the popular sci-fi genre there are voices that some parts of the movie are more of a fact than fiction. In particular – the landing and the contact scenes are believed to depict actual events that took place near Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico in April of 1964.

[edina]

Posted by edina (here)
Here's a recent update from CodeMonkey about 8Chan:

Attachment 41479

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/stat...28088155389952

When 8Chan is back online and Q starts posting again, I will continue to repost the Q posts here in this thread.

According to the supbeona for James Watkins, linked here, he was scheduled to meet tomorrow, 5 Sep, at 9:30 AM.

However, when I go to the Congress.gov page and look for hearings scheduled for tomorrow, I don't see one for Homeland Security.

https://www.congress.gov/committee-s...kly/2019/09/02

There is a Committee of Homeland Security hearing schedule for next week on the 10th. But, it doesn't seem to be exactly on the topic related to 8Chan.

I'm wondering if the hearing has been rescheduled. And if so, it will likely be that 8Chan will not come back online until that hearing is complete.

[edina]

Posted by Ba-ba-Ra (here)

My late husband always felt Roddenberry had tapped into another dimension, mainly because Roddenberry would arrive on set and say things like: "No, the panel on the starship didn't look like that, it looked like this. Or, it wasn't over there, it was over here.

Reminder: the series may have been based on some truth that was given to Roddenberry (either thru dreams or visions), BUT, if so, they also had to have drama, etc, so while the general ideas and premises may be conveying truths, a lot of the plots are just entertainment, so don't take them too literally.

This is a very interesting bit of detail.

I watched the Star Trek Q stories video. I didn't realize how many different "Q"s and Q-related storylines there were.

Thanks for sharing Ba-ba-Ra.

[mountain_jim]

From Brian Cates

https://threader.app/thread/1168749477764751361

Brian Cates
@drawandstrike
Columnist for the @EpochTimes. Digital Soldier & Actual Journalist. Mostly deaf. Just a lovable fuzzball. subscribestar.com/brian-cates-po…
Sep. 03, 2019 7 min read

"The agent whose testimony is central to the perjury case against Flynn got himself fired from the FBI for showing blatant political bias in the performance of his duties."


https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-mu...m_2732149.html

…
"When the agent sitting at the center of the beating heart of both the Crossfire Hurricane scandal and your own highly problematic perjury prosecution of Flynn manages to get himself fired for blatant bias and violating FBI protocol, you’re going to be forced to tread carefully."

"The FBI itself cleared him of any wrongdoing after reviewing the intercepts of the phone calls. That story appeared in The Washington Post the same day that Strzok and Pientka suddenly showed up at the White House to grill him about it."

"FBI already had the transcripts of the phone calls between Flynn & Kislyak, reviewed them & determined Flynn hadn’t violated the Logan Act or broken any other law. This was done before Strzok suddenly showed up to grill Flynn on what he and Kislyak had discussed."

This interview by Strzok & Pientka of Flynn takes place in the White House in January 2017.

302 forms are supposed to be filled out immediately following such interviews.

Stzok's 302 of this Flynn interview was not made until August of 2017.
What, you don't remember that?

I wrote about it last December:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/could-...d_2740382.html

…
That 302 form, filled out SEVEN MONTHS after the original interview, has another curious feature to it. The 302 is a bunch of notes of Strzok being interviewed about the Flynn interview. Somebody is walking him through it and writing down the answers he's giving.

If the Flynn interview was January 24, 2017, why is a 302 of the interview only being filled out then on August 22, seven months later?

And why would some unknown person be questioning Strzok about it & writing down his answers? Why didn't he do it himself?

Remember what transpired between January 24, the Flynn interview, and August 22, the filling out of Strzok's 302 form.

James Comey is fired on May 9. Mueller is appointed in May.

Strzok is assigned to Mueller's team in early June. Stzok is kicked off the team in late July.

By August of 2017, Horowitz, Rosenstein and Mueller all know about the text messages between Strzok & Page.

It's why Strzok was booted off the Mueller team & stuck in the FBI Human Resources Dept. while that got sorted out.

Recall what's IN those text messages.

1 of the things Strzok & Page are found to be discussing in their text messages is.....remember this?...is how they can cleverly go about INFLUENCING THE JUDGE WHO IS HEARING THE PERJURY CASE AGAINST LT. GEN. MICHAEL FLYNN.

Yes, indeed!
The agent who played an instrumental role in getting Flynn charged with perjury has been **caught** by the Inspector General discussing how to INFLUENCE the judge hearing the Flynn case.

This is not new. This has been know for over a YEAR AND A HALF.
So here's what I think: that original FD-302 got torn up because the way Strzok originally wrote it, it contained something that had to be changed.

Now that he's been exposed & is sitting the FBI HR Dept. somebody NEEDS a new 302 of that Flynn interview.

So seven months later, after he's already been caught, Strzok has to help this person, who I suspect but can't yet prove is Andrew McCabe, write out a new 302 form that changes how that Flynn interview was covered.

Nothing I'm saying here is new. All this stuff has been public information for more than a year. Some of it, for a year and a half, since December of 2017.

All I'm doing is REMINDING you.
Now add another piece to this puzzle, which I discussed last night.

Strzok is caught through the text messages by IG Horowitz in July 2017.

Flynn didn't plead guilty before Judge "Rudy" Contreras until December 1, 2017.

Four months later.
So...by at least early August of 2017, WHO knows that Strzok & Page have been caught discussing trying to influence the judge hearing the Flynn perjury case being run by the Mueller Special Counsel prosecutors?

1. IG Horowitz
2. DAG Rosenstein
3. Andrew McCabe
Remember who the ACTING DIRECTOR of the FBI is after Comey gets fired.

I don't believe they could yank both Strzok & Page off the Mueller team with McCabe finding out why.

You know who else knows by August about this?

Bob Mueller does.
So...how many people at this point, August 2017, know there's an issue with Judge Contreras?

1. Horowitz
2. Rosenstein
3. McCabe
4. Mueller.

Here's the amazing thing. Here's what doesn't make sense on the surface.

They know...and nobody stops what's going to happen.
4 months go by. Flynn's court date arrives.

He pleads guilty before Judge Rudolph Contreras to 1 count of perjury.

Immediately after this, Judge Contreras is suddenly removed from this case & replaced by Judge Emmit Sullivan, a judge famous for Brady rulings.
So here's what I think happened: that original 302 form from January 2017 that was replaced by the one Strzok helped make in August? It has exculpatory evidence in it.

They didn't make public the fact they were going to charge Flynn with perjury until November 5, 2017.

The new 302 form isn't made until August 2017 & they don't move to charge Flynn with perjury until early November 2017.

Comey's firing in May messed up a lot of their plans, and McCabe & the others are having to make it up as they go.
So very late, not until August, do the SpyGate plotters decide to take that January interview with Flynn & turn it into a perjury case & have Mueller prosecute it.

And part of preparing the perjury case was writing a new 302 that August, 7 months after the Flynn interview.
So here's where I'm going with this.

Strzok was NOT the only FBI agent at that Flynn interview in January 2017.

There was another agent there. Special Agent Joseph Pientka.

We've seen Strzok's post-dated 302.

We haven't seen Pientka's.

In engineering a perjury case against Flynn, the had to make a new 302 form in August with Strzok and use that as a basis to hand it off to Mueller's prosecutors, where's Pientka in all of this?

Where's his 302 from that interview? Does his recollection match Strzok's?

Well we don't know at this point.

Because nobody's seen or heard from Pientka ever since his name was made public.

He's been carefully kept out of sight and out of mind for almost a year and a half.

I've even taken to humorously calling him "The DOJ's Invisible Man".

I've suspected for over a year now that Pientka is going to be a whistleblower in all of this. Strzok, Page, McCabe, they've all been fired or forced to resign.

SSA Joe Pientka is still at the FBI. I'm positive he's already told Horowitz and now Durham everything he knows.
They literally can't produce Pientka until AFTER Horowitz has released his FISC abuse report because what Pientka knows is not only explosive, it's going to blow the lid off of TWO different things:

1) the Flynn set up

and

2) The DOJ/FBI/Fusion GPS backchannel

And as I've been saying, careful preparation has been underway to get things ready for these explosive revelations and it had to be managed with precision and care.

They couldn't have exposed any of this back in 2017 because things weren't nearly ready.

Pientka demonstrates how Flynn was targeted **and** how the FBI/DOJ was hiding/laundering where their Trump/Russia info was coming from - straight from Hillary Clinton's paid operatives at Fusion GPS.

Mifsud blows up the Russian agent narrative, Pientka blows up the rest.

Those who believe the Deep State is running everything are telling you Horowitz will either never release this FISC abuse report, or it's going to be a huge dud.

They also tell you nobody is EVER gonna hear from Pientka, they'll hide him until Trump leaves office.
Well prepare to be amazed.

Not only is this FISC abuse report going to hit with the force of a MOAB, there will be multiple indictments, and then all of a sudden both Mifsud & Pientka are going to magically appear to testify.

We'll see who's right. /

[Ba-ba-Ra]

Thanks Mt. Jim for the above post from Brian Cates.

It's good to keep bringing forth info we've already heard. Because many of us forget as so much is happening, it's hard to keep it all in our mental filing cabinets.

Below is mgray's latest. For me, it was a bombshell. Hope mgray doesn't mind me posting it.

Hurricane Dorian’s curious path
Posted on September 4, 2019
I’m not sure if this post can be proven any time soon, but in the future it may become common knowledge. However weather modification has been a tool for the US government since 1967 with Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War.

That operation was an attempt to extend the monsoon season with cloud seeding to disrupt the movement of enemy troops and supplies in the Asian nation of North Vietnam.

Well the odds of the movements of Hurricane Dorian over the last week seem to be very high and coincidental to be considered random.

Late last week President Trump (below) said in a Rose Garden sppech that Dorian would hit “dead center” without giving a specific location. He warned of its strength and to heed official instructions.

Little St. James Island in the American Virgin Islands, where sex trafficker Jeffery Epstein had his pedo operations was hit “dead center”. Then the storm looped around Puerto Rico causing minimal beach erosion and tropical storm winds, to make a beeline for the Bahamas.

By the time the storm reached Great Abaco Island in the Bahamas it was a Category 5 storm with wind gusts above 220 MPH. Hurricane Dorian parked itself over the island for more than 36 hours, laying waste to all of the island.

Now what is located at Great Abaco Island in the Bahamas?

China’s two largest shipping ports serving the east coast of the United States.

One port is a joint operation between China and Denmark’s largest shipping company Maersk. The photo below shows the devastation of the Bahamian port.

If you recall last month the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called President Trump’s idea of buying Greenland “absurd” prompting the president to say her remarks were “nasty” and “Inappropriate”. The White House promptly canceled a state trip to Denmark scheduled to take place next week.

Just to clarify. These locations were Dorian hit were less than a mile from the eye of the storm, meaning they were “dead center”.

As of Wednesday morning, it appears a much weaken Dorian will turn north and most likely not hit the US mainland as it turns up the coast bringing rain and tropical winds to the southeast coasts.

I leave it to you to determine your level of skepticism on how many coincidences you are comfortably with before coming to a conclusion.

Lastly, my prayers go out to the people devastated by the storm and for the lives lost.

https://twitter.com/3Days3Nights/sta...243523/photo/1


. . . .AND THE PLOT THICKENS . . . .IPOT

The Chinese and Danish Connection - Maersk Shipping Co. . . and disney

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5KUkVKtkINU

[mountain_jim]

Neon new article concerning the Google whistleblower (who I know there are questions about motive and purpose for)

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/09/0...reatawakening/

The Google Whistleblower’s Message from #QAnon. #GreatAwakening
September 4, 2019 by Neon Revolt


Guys, I’m really excited to be able to help break this news along with Thomas at TruReporting, and Redpill78.

I recently had the chance to talk to the #GoogleWhistleblower, Zach Vorhies, who you’ll recall recently dumped a ton of incriminating documents he had saved over the years working at Google with Project Veritas, leading to a number of stunning revelations about the way Google is manipulating the public’s access to certain kinds of information they unilaterally deem unacceptable, on top of interfering in elections world-wide. Zach was also able to submit tons of materials to the DOJ, and had, at one point, police sniper rifles trained at him from the rooftops where he lived, following Google’s attempt to paint Zach as mentally unstable. In response, Zach not only set up a dead-man’s switch was forced to go public, where the spotlight of the press would provide him some much-needed protection, and mitigate Google’s sinister escalation of the matter.

In talking to Zach, I learned a number of things, but naturally, being who I am and what I do, the conversation soon turned to the subject of #QAnon. I asked him his thoughts about the level of censorship Q is experiencing (and likely going to experience in the future), as well as his own thoughts on the movement, and that’s when he dropped a bombshell on me.

The very day that Vorhies went public with Project Veritas, he gets a text message out-of-the-blue.
It’s from a number he has never seen before, and has never had any contact with.

And it is startling:



Zach shows me this conversation, and of course all kinds of questions run through our minds. Is this legit? Is there anyway to verify this? Should we, uhhhhh, call back the number it came from?

Now, I’m not about to publish that number that it came from. I have no desire to “doxx” Q, or anyone potentially related to the operation. And besides, I advised Zach to pretty much forget the number. If this is legit, and this is actually originating from Military Intelligence, they can spoof numbers anyway. For all we know, it could be a number they selected at random. It might also be from a burner.

I also tell him I will not be calling back the number because if this is legit, I do not need spooks showing up at my doorstep. (Not that that would stop them in this particular scenario, per se).

Guys, I’m not saying this is 100% beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt legit… but I will say right now, I’m definitely leaning towards this being legit. And this isn’t exactly unprecedented.

< more at link, including discussion about 8ch upcoming testifying >

[Ba-ba-Ra]

GENERAL MATTIS SLAMS OBAMA

And Rep. Omar's husband speaks out

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xo0FoIv-H24

SerialBrain2 . . . . .some interesting dot connecting

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-3aAnD3Oij8

[edina]

Here's an update on the Homeland Security Hearing with 8chan's James Watkins.

Evidently the hearing did take place this morning.

Code Monkey tweeted about it on his channel.

And 8chan tweeted a status update:

We have retained Mr. Benjamin Barr to assist us in attending the Congressional hearing. In the interest of transparency, here's what we submitted to the Committee in preparation for the deposition.

Here's a link to the 6 page statement prepared. It's an interesting read.

And a link to the joint statement by Rep Bennie Thompson (D) and Rep Mike Rogers (R).

[Ba-ba-Ra]

REP. NUNES TAKES FUSION GPS TO COURT

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZkIcDuKioeQ

BLACK PATRIOT . . . 2 ADDITIONAL COMEY WHITEHOUSE SPIES REVEALED

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xfqu_1Gpd9c

[mountain_jim]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...rst-amendment/

8Chan Owner Provides Private Testimony Before Congress, Defends the First Amendment

The owner of 8chan, Jim Watkins, provided a closed door congressional deposition before the House Homeland Security Committee on Thursday.

Watkins maintains that the site “has never tolerated illegal speech and has a consistent track record of working with law enforcement agencies when appropriate.”

Congress had summoned the anonymous online forum’s owner to testify about how the website plans to tackle “the proliferation of extremist content, including white supremacist content.”

“We want to thank Mr. Watkins for his cooperation today,” House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson and ranking member Mike Rogers said in a statement about the deposition. “He provided vast and helpful information to the Committee about the structure, operation, and policies of 8Chan and his other companies.” They added that they “look forward to his continued cooperation with the Committee as he indicated his desire to do so during today’s deposition.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson and Rep. Mike Rogers had previously wrote in a letter to Watkins that the El Paso shooting was “at least the third act of supremacist violence linked to your website this year.” Similarly, the shooter also had Instagram and Twitter accounts, but representatives from those platforms have not been summoned.

8Chan’s official Twitter account tweeted that they have retained Benjamin Barr as their lawyer, as well as their response to the inquiry.

Barr has previously represented Project Veritas.

“Mindful of tragedies America has faced, Mr. Watkins also believes in the exceptional promise of the First Amendment. 8chan is the only platform featuring a full commitment to free speech—a one-of-a-kind discussion board where anonymous users shared tactics about French democracy protests, how to circumvent censorship in repressive countries, and the best way to beat a classic video game. In this hodgepodge of chaotic discussion, down-home recipes are traded, sorrows lifted, and a small minority of users post hateful and ignorant items,” the letter to the committee explained.

8Chan has come under scrutiny in recent times, particularly after rumors swirled that the El Paso shooter had posted a manifesto on the platform.

Watkins contends that it had not been posted by the shooter.

“First of all, the El Paso shooter posted on Instagram, not 8Chan. Later, someone uploaded a manifesto. However, that manifesto was not uploaded by the Walmart shooter,” Watkins asserted in his video statement. “I don’t know if he wrote it or not, but it was not uploaded by the murderer. That is clear, and law enforcement was made aware of this before most people had even heard the horrific news.”

The forum has been targeted by a massive campaign to have it removed from the internet and is currently offline as it was dropped first by the cybersecurity company Cloudfare, then by Voxility — who provides infrastructure for the hosting platform Epik.

[mountain_jim]

https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/5/20...-paso-shooting

8chan could be back online as soon as next week, lawyer says

The site could still have trouble securing hosting

8chan owner Jim Watkins provided evidence to congressional staffers on Thursday to comply with a subpoena the House Homeland Security Committee issued him after a series of racist manifestos from mass shooters were posted on the site. His site has remained down since shortly after the shooting — but new statements made to The Verge suggest it may be coming back sooner than many expected.

According to Watkins’s lawyer, Benjamin Barr, 8chan’s owners hope to have the site back online in the next week or so. In his prepared remarks for the committee, Watkins said that 8chan is currently “offline voluntarily” and that it may come back online soon, once the site “is able to develop additional tools to counter illegal content under United States law.”

“This isn’t written in stone, but somewhere around a week, they hope to be back,” Barr said.

“THIS ISN’T WRITTEN IN STONE, BUT SOMEWHERE AROUND A WEEK, THEY HOPE TO BE BACK”
Barr told The Verge that he believes the tools Watkins described are complete, but he could not comment on exactly what the tools are or how the relaunched 8chan will counter illegal content on the platform. In his prepared remarks, Watkins did say that 8chan could implement a “read-only” mode for when the site is in a state of emergency, like when a manifesto is posted, or created a separate “restricted mode” that would go into effect under the same circumstances that would make the site inaccesible over the Tor Network and prohibit users from posting any files.

But Barr pushed back against reading too much into that idea. “I don’t think it is the restricted mode,” Barr told The Verge, “but it is with respect to being able to identify illegal content.”

Watkins wrote in his statement for the committee that 8chan already uses one bot to “remove illegal content and spam, automated or human, based only on keywords.”

So far, it appears that 8chan is still down because they are still threatened

“They’ve already executed the security,” Barr told The Verge, but 8chan is currently offline because the owners are “working on having a stable hosting solution where they can’t be deplatformed or it will be a lot more difficult to deplatform them.”

8chan was initially taken offline in early August after the white nationalist El Paso, Texas shooting that left over 20 people dead. The suspected shooter posted a racist screed onto the site prior to carrying out the attack. Following the shooting, Cloudflare, the company that provided cybersecurity to 8chan revoked its service and effectively forced the site offline. After securing another security service, 8chan’s host Epik, also pulled service.

According to Barr, Watkins may be asked to return to the committee in the future, and he hopes to have a publicized hearing. Thursday’s meeting happened behind closed doors with committee staffers, not lawmakers. It’s currently not clear when that next meeting might occur.

“We want to thank Mr. Watkins for his cooperation today,” committee leaders said in a statement following the meeting Thursday. “He provided vast and helpful information to the Committee about the structure, operation, and policies of 8Chan and his other companies. We look forward to his continued cooperation with the Committee as he indicated his desire to do so during today’s deposition.”

[enigma3]

For those who follow EyeTheSpy, there is a Q&A session posted on his Twitter with some interesting statements made. Q related.

https://twitter.com/TrueEyeTheSpy/st...51429046853637

[mountain_jim]

Posted by enigma3 (here)
For those who follow EyeTheSpy, there is a Q&A session posted on his Twitter with some interesting statements made. Q related.

https://twitter.com/TrueEyeTheSpy/st...51429046853637

I am not familiar (or have forgotten) about this source - what is the backstory / verification (if any) for this source?

update

https://inteldinarchronicles.blogspo...a-nz-6118.html

"Is EyeTheSpy Fake?" by Sierra (NZ) - 6.1.18

6/01/2018 10:22:00 PM Emailed, Thoughts
Entry Submitted by Sierra (NZ) at 9:40 PM EDT on June 1, 2018

There is discussion in the Truth community about the authenticity of EyeTheSpy. Some 'Truthers' are posting videos saying that EyeTheSpy is 'fake'. They are urging their viewers not to read anything he writes on Twitter.

Hmmm. That sounds suspiciously like the same kind of censorship indulged in by the giant media corporations eg taking down Truther You Tube channels, canceling Rosanne Barr's TV show.

EyeTheSpy makes it clear that it's his PERSONAL Twitter account. He doesn't claim to be Q - in fact he emphasizes that Q is way out of his security clearance league. EyeTheSpy says that he is a Q admirer, like the rest of us, and while he works (maybe) at the National Security Agency, he certainly does not have the the ear of Q.

We need to be discerning at this late stage of the game. It is up to each of us to finely tune our BS monitor. We need to instinctively know how we feel about EVERYTHING as we read articles and watch videos.

I still follow my time-honored method for discerning what resonates with me: Does it make my heart sink or sing? Also, we have so little time left now for proof, so we will ALL know the Truth VERY SOON.

Meanwhile, remember to sit back with your big bowl of popcorn and enjoy the show. All is well.

Love and Light
Sierra (NZ)

[Ratszinger]

No outside comms

[Ba-ba-Ra]

Thanks Enigma3 for the EyeTheSpy post above.


The following is an important discussion with Jerome Corsi where he reveals more about Bill Ayers & Bernadatte Dorn (The Weathermen) their influence of OBummer, the Unholy Alliance between Islam & Communism, Bill Barr and the next test which will reveal-according to Corsi if Barr is a true swamp creature or not.

begin around 5:00 if you want to avoid the promotions of Corsi's website & books.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cqcSsjro7JI

[Ba-ba-Ra]

LATEST X22 REPORT


More on Jessie Smollett; . .Greg Craig, (attorney who served in Obama WH) found not guilty (not good) . . . . Alva Johnson, who accused Trump of forcing a kiss, (pushing an agenda) it didn't work.. . .Nunes lawsuit against Fusion GPS. . . . .Lindsay Graham pushing hearing for further investigation outside Durham's. . . .DS being pushed on many fronts.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MTtKPaiELp8

[Ratszinger]

Posted by Ba-ba-Ra (here)
LATEST X22 REPORT


More on Jessie Smollett; . .Greg Craig, (attorney who served in Obama WH) found not guilty (not good) . . . . Alva Johnson, who accused Trump of forcing a kiss, (pushing an agenda) it didn't work.. . .Nunes lawsuit against Fusion GPS. . . . .Lindsay Graham pushing hearing for further investigation outside Durham's. . . .DS being pushed on many fronts.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MTtKPaiELp8

I expect corrupted people they discover to be turned. I don't expect them to arrest a perfectly good tool, already established that could be used to their advantage in the future for some political or diplomatic favor or maneuver. The fact is this is politics. If arresting Comey was to their advantage I suspect they'd have done so. I believe Comey does have a long history perspective on the Clinton's few could offer and if say someone were to hold a hot barrel of oil under him while he was suspended over it, figuratively speaking, he would be more likely to turn to answer to a new boss than say go to prison or worse!

I believe Rosenstein was hooked and they got him and then turned him to play their game and be on their side rather than arrest him and humiliate him. I suspect the same with Comey and perhaps others people expect to be arrested. I mean lets face it the side you play on is not always up to you in politics right? Barr is a long time Bush loyalist from way back and I believe he is there to make these deals and turn people into tools his side can use. Barr is simply collecting players and any that don't want to come on board well, Guantanamo is their choice. Would you agree?