+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 37 FirstFirst 1 5 15 25 37 LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 728

Thread: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

  1. Link to Post #281
    Germany Avalon Member Open Minded Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st May 2020
    Language
    German
    Posts
    981
    Thanks
    2,007
    Thanked 8,051 times in 968 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    I assume that most here has been mentioned already such as vitamin C and D and other vital (e.g. plant-based) substances.

    One thing is lesser known and I remembered it from my mycotherapy training from years ago. It is (preferably organic!) mushroom powder from the Coriolus mushroom.
    If you get hold of it from a trusted producer of organic mushroom power I recommend give it a try.

    See more on it on the site of a local producer and institute from my country (also where I studied it) here:

    https://mykotroph.de/en/coriolus-versicolor-en/

    And there's a lot more to medicinal mushrooms that we know about, especially in the Western world where it is hardly used. So for more info on other benefits and diseases that can be treated effectively with mushrooms you can read up on it here:

    https://mykotroph.de/en/medicinal-mushrooms/

    Quote Turkey tail – the mushroom has been used for generations in East Asia and supports the immune system in the fight against viruses. Even “Ötzi” the Iceman – a well-preserved natural mummy of a man who lived between 3400 and 3100 BC – had a relative of this kind in his travel pharmacy 5,200 years ago.

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Open Minded Dude For This Post:

    Agape (24th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Constance (23rd August 2020), Franny (28th May 2020), Gwin Ru (23rd May 2020), Sarah Rainsong (23rd May 2020)

  3. Link to Post #282
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Language
    English
    Age
    80
    Posts
    13,430
    Thanks
    32,729
    Thanked 69,411 times in 11,915 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    An E.R. Doctor Infected With Covid-19 Back At Work After Using Hydroxychloroquine and Z-Pak Protocol


    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Agape (24th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Billy (9th June 2020), Constance (23rd August 2020), Elainie (23rd May 2020), Gwin Ru (23rd May 2020), Sarah Rainsong (24th May 2020), Sue (Ayt) (24th May 2020)

  5. Link to Post #283
    Aaland Avalon Member Agape's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2010
    Posts
    5,801
    Thanks
    14,834
    Thanked 27,084 times in 4,838 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    This could be good news and potentially a game changer:

    Kangra tea could boost immunity and block Covid 19 activity better than antiretroviral drugs

    Indian scientists from the Himalayan Bioresource Institute of Technology based in Palampur, Himachal Pradesh identified about 65 phytophenols in locally sourced from Kangra green tea that can bind to specific viral proteins faster than commercially available anti-virotic drugs in trial.

    There is number of products that have been tried( and kind of ignored) for many years from their labs and results containing high levels of tea saponins such as green tea wine, green tea vinegar , soaps and disinfectants.

    Since this piece of news was released only today I bet they are fast and getting some kind of concentrated medicine with fast bioavailability out as we talk.

    I do believe it because we drink the Kangra green tea locally and it’s very strong and aromatic. So I usually have a cup to improve my heart rhythm but not very often.
    It’s a super strong fresh variety of tea with thousands of years history of human cultivation native to the Kangra valley in Himachal Pradesh, in India.

    Kangra Tea Garden

    Dharmsala Tea Company


    It’s a early bird news of course but certainly worth a trial.


    🙏🍵🙏
    Last edited by Agape; 24th May 2020 at 07:11.

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Agape For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), EFO (14th June 2020), Franny (28th May 2020), Gwin Ru (24th May 2020), onevoice (24th May 2020), Open Minded Dude (24th May 2020), Sarah Rainsong (24th May 2020), Sunny (25th May 2020)

  7. Link to Post #284
    United States Avalon Member Sarah Rainsong's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2020
    Location
    Hi y'all!
    Language
    English
    Posts
    504
    Thanks
    8,909
    Thanked 4,534 times in 505 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Quote Posted by Agape (here)
    This could be good news and potentially a game changer:

    Kangra tea could boost immunity and block Covid 19 activity better than antiretroviral drugs

    Indian scientists from the Himalayan Bioresource Institute of Technology based in Palampur, Himachal Pradesh identified about 65 phytophenols in locally sourced from Kangra green tea that can bind to specific viral proteins faster than commercially available anti-virotic drugs in trial.

    There is number of products that have been tried( and kind of ignored) for many years from their labs and results containing high levels of tea saponins such as green tea wine, green tea vinegar , soaps and disinfectants.

    Since this piece of news was released only today I bet they are fast and getting some kind of concentrated medicine with fast bioavailability out as we talk.

    I do believe it because we drink the Kangra green tea locally and it’s very strong and aromatic. So I usually have a cup to improve my heart rhythm but not very often.
    It’s a super strong fresh variety of tea with thousands of years history of human cultivation native to the Kangra valley in Himachal Pradesh, in India.

    Kangra Tea Garden

    Dharmsala Tea Company


    It’s a early bird news of course but certainly worth a trial.


    🙏🍵🙏
    I'm curious, Agape, when you drink your Kanga green tea, how long do you steep it for? I know of several people for whom drinking green tea is more cultural, and they'll just let the pot sit pretty much all day, adding water to top off the same pot of tea. Dh (dear husband) does this, and so does his mother and his grandfather, and I knew some other people who do this, too--all of whom grew up drinking green tea like that.

    The longer the steep time, the more tannins are released, which can make the tea more bitter, at least to people who apparently didn't grow up drinking a long-steeped, high tannin tea. I didn't, and I favor a much shorter steep time. When I make green tea, I only steep for 5 minutes. Dh thinks my tea is too weak.

    So anyways, I'm just curious on your thoughts on the steep time and it's antiviral effectiveness?

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sarah Rainsong For This Post:

    Agape (24th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), EFO (14th June 2020), Sunny (25th May 2020)

  9. Link to Post #285
    Aaland Avalon Member Agape's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2010
    Posts
    5,801
    Thanks
    14,834
    Thanked 27,084 times in 4,838 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Quote Posted by Sarah Rainsong (here)
    Quote Posted by Agape (here)
    This could be good news and potentially a game changer:

    Kangra tea could boost immunity and block Covid 19 activity better than antiretroviral drugs

    Indian scientists from the Himalayan Bioresource Institute of Technology based in Palampur, Himachal Pradesh identified about 65 phytophenols in locally sourced from Kangra green tea that can bind to specific viral proteins faster than commercially available anti-virotic drugs in trial.

    There is number of products that have been tried( and kind of ignored) for many years from their labs and results containing high levels of tea saponins such as green tea wine, green tea vinegar , soaps and disinfectants.

    Since this piece of news was released only today I bet they are fast and getting some kind of concentrated medicine with fast bioavailability out as we talk.

    I do believe it because we drink the Kangra green tea locally and it’s very strong and aromatic. So I usually have a cup to improve my heart rhythm but not very often.
    It’s a super strong fresh variety of tea with thousands of years history of human cultivation native to the Kangra valley in Himachal Pradesh, in India.

    Kangra Tea Garden

    Dharmsala Tea Company


    It’s a early bird news of course but certainly worth a trial.


    🙏🍵🙏
    I'm curious, Agape, when you drink your Kanga green tea, how long do you steep it for? I know of several people for whom drinking green tea is more cultural, and they'll just let the pot sit pretty much all day, adding water to top off the same pot of tea. Dh (dear husband) does this, and so does his mother and his grandfather, and I knew some other people who do this, too--all of whom grew up drinking green tea like that.

    The longer the steep time, the more tannins are released, which can make the tea more bitter, at least to people who apparently didn't grow up drinking a long-steeped, high tannin tea. I didn't, and I favor a much shorter steep time. When I make green tea, I only steep for 5 minutes. Dh thinks my tea is too weak.

    So anyways, I'm just curious on your thoughts on the steep time and it's antiviral effectiveness?

    Hi Sarah, thanks for response. I think I know what you’re talking about.

    There is so much to tea culture all around the globe and so many types and flavours of tea. The immersion time exactly depends on what kind of tea you choose.

    Chinese and Taiwanese Oolongs can stand two or three “flushes” of hot water and they taste even better, softer in the second run.
    Some of the best quality teas like “White Plum” collected from the softest leaves at the top of the tea plant can stand only two before they taste like water.

    I would recommend Japanese green tea for taste as it’s seldom any bitter.

    This Kangra tea grown in Himalayan valleys maybe special as the soil is extremely rich in minerals and basically traces of most elements of the periodic table.
    So in result, herbs and vegetables are more potent here and taste better too.

    It’s for the same reason why I never drank much of the green tea here- but I should- thinking it’s “too strong”. When fresh it requires very fast immersion time. Basically couple seconds to a minute. It has deep yellow colour and I have to admit it’s little bitter but the taste is “full” as in complete. It satisfies whole spectrum of taste buds.

    So I’m not surprised they found at least 65 different types of phytophenols in it, the next step would probably be producing liquid extract for common use though I’m sure they probably have something more advanced in plan, hopefully into the extraction and isolation of the tea saponins and turning them to life medicine.
    It will necessarily require lots of testing for applications and bioavailability before we get there.


    I’m a spoiled milk coffee drinker( turned from more spoiled milk tea drinker -called chai- in India) but trying to improve habits.


    I really wish it gets out soon. The number of cases in India is on sharp rise at the moment as summer is starting to peak.

    But I can see the global numbers are predictably coming down as of the moment which is a good news.

    Though: there is a danger of second wave in summer. Viruses like hot temperatures, not to mention faster transmission rate.


    The atmosphere surrounding the pandemics here in India is quite different from the West( of us ) I’ve noticed, guess anyone may notice from the news.

    It’s partially certainly for the fact of huge biodiversity on Indian subcontinent that includes still bigger amount of microbial diversity some of which has not been described in the medical journals to this day.
    Many of those known and unknown infections affected humans for thousands of years and were virtually wiped out during the last century due to massive improvements in water sanitation and general hygiene.

    If you were a curious doctor visiting India couple decades ago you would be charmed by cases of infections we have never witnessed in Europe, not in the modern times anyway.

    So people are well aware of the danger of infectious diseases since days of old and accustomed to keeping rules that can protect them but not all are, not all act smart enough and well, many people still live stranded deep under poverty line.

    Well it’s not upon me to sort it out, just explaining that people here “don’t want the virus” and those who can isolate themselves and their children voluntarily, at least till the tidal wave is over.

    🌊🍵
    Last edited by Agape; 24th May 2020 at 16:10.

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Agape For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Delight (24th May 2020), EFO (14th June 2020), Sarah Rainsong (24th May 2020), Sunny (25th May 2020)

  11. Link to Post #286
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,398 times in 4,672 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    About Vitamin D:
    Dr. Rhonda Patrick Goes In Depth on the Benefits of Vitamin D

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Agape (26th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), onevoice (25th May 2020)

  13. Link to Post #287
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,486
    Thanks
    53,904
    Thanked 137,710 times in 23,921 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    THEY BLOCKED EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS
    8,829 views•May 25, 2020
    The HighWire with Del Bigtree
    168K subscribers

    "The #5 reason why we are not on “Team Corona-phobia.”
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Agape (26th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Elainie (27th May 2020), Franny (28th May 2020), Gwin Ru (26th May 2020)

  15. Link to Post #288
    Aaland Avalon Member Agape's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2010
    Posts
    5,801
    Thanks
    14,834
    Thanked 27,084 times in 4,838 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    No major side effects of HCQ, should be continued as preventative treatment for Covid 19

    There is so much misconception and media mess concerning the use of chloroquine as preventative and treatment, blame the “intel” of pharmaceutical companies and inexperience of some of todays fast baked medical professionals.
    Either they dunno, or they pretend not to know or don’t care to explain the topic clearly.

    Clearly a commoner without medical education can not make true sense of it, even the head of WHO can not make sense of it and half of the medical community can’t make sense of it but blindly follow what’s in recent guidelines.

    I can but share what I know from “old school medicine” and first hand practice but bet in it or not it still serves me well.

    Chloroquinone and HCQ was used since its discovery as derivative of quinine to reduce high fever of any origin. Fever itself is not a “disease”, it’s a symptom of disease. Fevers are not specifically caused only by infections or non-infectious inflammations. If your cardiovascular system is weak, you may get fever from overheating, for example.

    The only other tested use of HCQ is it being antihelmintic, toxic to certain intestinal parasites.

    It was sold over counter even while many other medicines were restricted to prescription and used safely against fevers in both children and adults.
    Even in lower therapeutic doses than prescribed today, it’s antipyretic effect was almost immediate and known to work in maximally 3 days.

    It could be prescribed for 7-14 days maximally in serious cases of pneumonia accompanied by fever ( not otherwise).

    Once the symptom of fever was reduced, talking of high fevers not just temperatures elevated to 37.5 C for which HCQ is not recommended therapeutically since it lowers your natural immunity by reducing your temperature and masking symptoms.

    There is no use of HCQ as “preventative against Covid 19”, except for very hot countries like India.
    Such use was never tested before but it can’t be generally recommended especially not in long term.

    Your body temperature is a marker of your overall condition, not a “disease”.

    “Temperature testing” is not a testing for Covid. I know of individuals who will rise body temperature to 37.9 C if they have to wait hour in queue, stressed of being held suspect.

    Likewise, HCQ does not seem to act as antivirotic. We don’t know of original properties of quinine and whether it was able to eliminate malaria plasmids from blood or other microorganisms but it does not seem to act the same way as derivative and manmade compound, that said, it has low antiviral properties to call it such.

    It does not mean its use should be discontinued as target agent against fever.

    But lowering your body temperature chronically does not help, it reduces your immunity and capability to “fight the virus” when infected of which fever is a symptom.
    Fever occurs as highly calibrated immunity response against alien pathogen.

    Fever in itself is not dangerous unless it lasts too long.


    In either case, chloroquine should be used once you get fever and only then, not as a preventative against Covid.


    It does not make you immune to infection but can mask early symptoms which does not mean that you won’t get to trouble later, that all for suppressed immunity response.


    🕊🕊🕊
    Freedom of information act

  16. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Agape For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), earthdreamer (27th May 2020), Harmony (27th May 2020), Sarah Rainsong (27th May 2020), wondering (27th May 2020)

  17. Link to Post #289
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,752
    Thanks
    9,457
    Thanked 45,433 times in 6,387 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention


  18. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Agape (27th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), earthdreamer (27th May 2020), Harmony (27th May 2020), Sarah Rainsong (27th May 2020), wondering (27th May 2020)

  19. Link to Post #290
    United States Avalon Member Sarah Rainsong's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2020
    Location
    Hi y'all!
    Language
    English
    Posts
    504
    Thanks
    8,909
    Thanked 4,534 times in 505 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    This first part of this post is a version of something I shared with my family. I thought it might be helpful here, because if you can understand what’s going on with respect to the virus, you’re better equipped to deal with. (This is only about the virus itself, not about all the other crap that’s tied to it.)

    The second is what I've experience personally, sharing so that others can glean any knowledge they want.


    First, this is a very basic, bulleted outline and summary of what I have learned so far. There are two good sources that I will link to, both of these include a list of their own sources, so you have a chain of information should you wish to follow it.

    Looking at the virus: latest on how it works, symptoms, treatments, etc.
    Latest information on the virus itself
    • While the virus enters the body primarily (though not exclusively) through the respiratory system, it is far from just a respiratory virus.
    • The virus utilizes the ACE2 receptors, which are cells found all in the body and this is why there is such a wide variety of symptoms being reported
    • At this point in time the lungs, kidneys, heart, brain, GI tract, skin, and the blood cells/circulatory system are the main organs affected.
    • Clotting is a showing to be a major factor in this disease, even affecting normally healthy adults
    • It also affects olfactory neurons and can then spread to the brain, thus causing neurological issues.
    • My personal observation: The biggest indicator on whether or not you have a strain of this virus, particularly a milder version (which only means that you don’t need a hospital) is that it is different than any other cold, flu or illness you may have had before.
      No matter the symptoms being reported, the most often repeated phrase I’ve noted is: “this is different from anything I’ve had or encountered before.” This is coming from both those who have been sick and those treating the sick.

    Current Symptoms
    • cough
    • sore throat
    • muscle pain and/or weakness
    • general achiness
    • headache and/or dizziness*
    • chills
    • fever
    • shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
    • (new) loss of taste or smell*
    • nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea
    • heart arrhythmias
    • skin rashes
    • conjunctivitis
    • blood clotting
    • swollen lymphs
    • hair and scalp pain*
    • confusion or sense of not being one’s self*
    • depressed level of consciousness*
    • tingling/fizziness sensation*
    • seizures*
      *indicates a likely neurological symptom

    Looking at the numbers:
    • Normal at-home deaths in NYC average 25/day. In April/May, they have been between 150-275/day. (Not comparable to every location, but indicates severity particularly in NYC and the possibility of unconfirmed Covid19 deaths)
    • Comparing to flu:
      • confirmed flu deaths range 3,448 to 15,620 per year
      • Most flu numbers quotes are estimates, not actual confirmed cases
      • In the last six flu seasons, the CDC’s reported number of actual confirmed flu deaths—that is, counting flu deaths the way we are currently counting deaths from the coronavirus—has ranged from 3,448 to 15,620
      • Covid19 from Jan to May 23, 2020 - 97,800

    Additional
    • Testing can produce both false positives and false negatives.
    • Testing may not identify newer strains.
    • There have been a significant number of people who have recovered from infection only to later become positive for the virus, as yet no one knows why. Theories include:
      • Viral sequestering (like lyme disease)
      • Reinfection after cure. (This is not uncommon with coronaviruses, the common cold is an example.)
      • Testing failures

    (Note: The main reason I included the numbers is that I have several family members who would like to believe it's all b.s. And while I know there are many who don't believe the virus is real, I am not one of them. If you're not prepared, this virus can really wipe you out.)

    Main Sources:
    PLANT-BASED INTERVENTIONS FOR CORONAVIRUS (SARS-COV-2) (And the Necessity for Sophisticated, Organ-Specific Treatments) by Stephen Harrod Buhner - A 80 page report that gives a very detailed view of how the virus works in addition to possible treatment protocols. (This is also referenced upthread.) The last 13 pages list his sources.

    Coronavirus: Something's Not Right Here… video by Chris Martenson - Detailed update given on April 30, 2020. Starting at 17:30, comparing numbers - “Even the flu isn’t the flu.” Sources can be found in the video description.


    Second, My Experience:
    I have been sick since basically Mother’s Day. This makes day 24. Not all days are bad days! Some are worse than others, and what I’ve noticed is that what you eat makes a huuuge difference.

    I’m going to detail my experience and what I did below, just as a reference, but the main point that I’ve learned is it is extremely important to be healthy and maintain a proper balance in your body. The minute you allow your body to get out of balance, this virus jumps on you.

    When people talk about it being opportunistic, this is what they mean. It is searching for the slightest foothold, and it doesn’t take much for it to find one.

    So here’s my experience:
    Mother’s Day I felt really bad and did absolutely nothing, but I took my vitamins and supplements and herbs and by the next day, I was feeling pretty good. I had a lot of gardening that I wanted to do, so for the rest of that week, I spend a great deal of time outside working.

    During that week, at about Wednesday, the temperature was rising and finally beginning to feel like May in Georgia. I got to craving a nice, ice-cold Coke. I used to drink Cokes (Coca-Cola classic) all the time. I haven’t had much in years, except for occasionally. Certainly not for repeated days. This particular week, though, I had Coke three days in a row.

    (Side note: colas are probably the WORST "food" you could possible consume, particularly on a regular basis.)

    I started feeling worse again on Friday. By Saturday, I couldn’t handle working for more than an hour before I gave up. Sunday was terrible. I was miserable.

    I had been taking stuff since Mother’s Day, and I had upped my regime on the following Friday when I started to decline. Then again on Sunday. And then again on Monday or Tuesday. The last time I upped it, I started to really feel better. Ultimately, this is what I ended up taking:
    • Regular vitamin protocols: complete B vitamins, vitamin C, zinc, D3, K, selenium, E, L-lysine, magnesium
    • Additional: liposomal vitamin C and glutathione
    • Herbal Extracts: Chinese Skullcap, Dong Quai, Rhodiola, Licorice, Blue Vervain, Angelica archangelica, Red Sage, Oregon Grape, and Poke (2 tsps of this combination every hour)
    • Herbal Tea: green tea, sage, and oregano
    There are many very good suggestions on this thread on protocols to follow if you get sick. My suggestion is to pick what works for you, and stick with it, every hour if needed, until you feel better, then to continue for at least another day before backing down to a maintenance level.

    Currently, my maintenance protocol--which means that I’m not over it but I don’t need as much as often--is the following;
    • Same regular vitamin protocols
    • Herbal extract 3 times a day: Red Sage, Dong Quai, Chickweed, Usnea, Licorice, and Poke (about 1 ½ tsp of this combination)
    • Herbal tea: green tea, red clover, holy basil and whatever else I might feel like (peppermint, catnip, lemon balm, etc.)
    • Diet: fresh greens every morning, usually a hefty amount of spinach sauteed with chopped onions and topped with an over-easy egg for breakfast

    It took a little trial-and-error to figure out what works for me. The biggest repeating symptom I've had is swollen lymphs. I have to make sure to keep up with my herbal lymph support, otherwise they get sore very quickly no matter how much I drink. Other symptoms: headache, achiness (like having a low-grade fever but no fever), nausea, malaise, fatigue, slight cough (not much!), ear ache, back ache, and vertigo.

    Generally, I didn't have all these symptoms at once. I'd be feeling better for a day, then something new (like vertigo) would start. I'd tackle that and something else, like a headache, would start. I'd have a day of feeling pretty good, then a day of not feeling good. It's like a roller coaster.

    So anyway, hopefully this adds some information to help fill in a larger picture.

  20. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Sarah Rainsong For This Post:

    Anka (27th May 2020), AutumnW (31st May 2020), Bill Ryan (27th May 2020), Gwin Ru (27th May 2020), hohoemi (3rd July 2020), leavesoftrees (28th May 2020), onevoice (27th May 2020), Sunny (29th May 2020), wondering (27th May 2020)

  21. Link to Post #291
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,398 times in 4,672 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Conversation

    Henry Makow @HenryMakow

    Reader- "Covid19 is a bacterium not a virus. Italian authorities did autopsies & found blood was clotted. They started using aspirin 100mg and anticoagulant medication. 14,000 people were released from the hospital as \"healthy\" and covid free."

    https://rense.com/general96/china-envoys-death-in-israel-mink-cov-leeching-clots-part-24.php

    8:06 PM · May 27, 2020·Twitter Web App

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Agape (28th May 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Sunny (29th May 2020)

  23. Link to Post #292
    Great Britain Avalon Member Baby Steps's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th August 2014
    Age
    58
    Posts
    1,665
    Thanks
    17,056
    Thanked 8,979 times in 1,551 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Is Quercetin a Safer Alternative to Hydroxychloroquine?
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    April 27, 2020
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a..._rid=859751977

    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    A Chinese trial comparing clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine and those receiving standard of care alone reports “disappointing” result
    The hydroxychloroquine group only had a 28-day negative conversion rate of 85.4% compared to the control group’s rate of 81.3%. No difference in the alleviation of symptoms was observed between the two groups
    The study did not, however, use supplemental zinc, which helps prevent viral replication. Evidence suggests hydroxychloroquine works for COVID-19 because it acts as a zinc ionophore, meaning it shuttles zinc inside your cells
    A Brazilian chloroquine trial stopped the high-dose arm of the study early due to patients developing ventricular tachychardia, a dangerous heart rhythm problem. Chloroquine is known to be more toxic than hydroxychloroquine
    Quercetin is a naturally occurring zinc ionophore. Taken with zinc, it may be helpful to prevent and potentially treat COVID-19. Research is currently underway to assess quercetin’s effectiveness against COVID-19
    The debate about whether the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19 continues, as a Chinese trial1,2,3,4 comparing clinical outcomes of those treated with the drug and those receiving standard of care alone reports “disappointing” results.

    Hydroxychloroquine Trial Reports Disappointing Results
    Seventy-five COVID-19 patients at 16 Chinese treatment centers received 1,200 milligrams of hydroxychloroquine in addition to standard of care for the first three days of treatment, followed by a maintenance dose of 800 mg per day for two weeks in mild to moderate cases and three weeks for severe cases. Another 75 patients received standard of care only.

    The primary endpoint was a 28-day negative conversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 (viral load reduction). Secondary endpoints included improvement rate of clinical symptoms and the normalization of C-reactive protein and blood lymphocyte count within 28 days.

    According to the authors, the hydroxychloroquine group only had a 28-day negative conversion rate of 85.4% compared to the control group’s rate of 81.3%. No difference in the alleviation of symptoms was observed between the two groups.

    Adverse events were also higher in the hydroxychloroquine group (30%) compared to controls (8.8%). You can find a listing of the adverse events in Table 2 of the study.5 The most common adverse event, at 10%, was diarrhea. That said, the authors point out that:6

    “A significant efficacy of HCQ [hydroxychloroquine] on alleviating symptoms was observed when the confounding effects of anti-viral agents were removed in the post-hoc analysis (Hazard ratio, 8.83, 95%CI, 1.09 to 71.3).

    This was further supported by a significantly greater reduction of CRP (6.986 in SOC [standard of care] plus HCQ versus 2.723 in SOC, milligram/liter, P=0.045) conferred by the addition of HCQ, which also led to more rapid recovery of lymphopenia, albeit no statistical significance.

    Conclusions: The administration of HCQ did not result in a higher negative conversion rate but more alleviation of clinical symptoms than SOC alone in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 without receiving antiviral treatment, possibly through anti-inflammatory effects. Adverse events were significantly increased in HCQ recipients but no apparently increase of serious adverse events.”

    Limitations of This Study
    A few things are worthy to note about this study. Aside from its small size, the patients received a far higher dose of hydroxychloroquine than typically used in the U.S. — 1,200 milligrams for the first three days, followed 800 mg per day for two to three weeks, compared to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s suggested dosage of 800 mg on Day 1, followed by 400 mg per day for four to seven days, depending on severity.7

    Secondly, most patients had mild disease with little hypoxemia, and thirdly, treatment was administered quite late, on average 16 to 17 days after the onset of disease. Commenting on the findings, Josh Fargas, associate professor of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the University of Vermont writes:8

    “Much of the pathogenesis of critical illness seems to result from dysregulated inflammation, rather than direct viral cytopathic effect. This raises a question of whether any antiviral treatment will be beneficial for late-presenting patients with severe illness.

    Of course, it is possible that earlier use of hydroxychloroquine could be beneficial (e.g., perhaps at the first signs of illness on an out-patient basis). This is under investigation and additional data is likely to be forthcoming soon. Even if this does work in the outpatient clinic, it would probably have little impact on the management of these patients within the intensive care unitThis Study Failed to Use Zinc
    Perhaps most importantly, however, is the absence of zinc, which Fargas does not mention. We now know that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine act as zinc ionophores,9,10 meaning they shuttle zinc into your cells, and zinc appears to be a “magic ingredient” required to prevent viral infection.11

    If given early, zinc along with a zinc ionophore should, at least theoretically, help lower the viral load and prevent the immune system from becoming overloaded. Without zinc, hydroxychloroquine may be more or less useless.

    So, in my view, I doubt this study is worth placing too much stock in, seeing how it did not administer supplemental zinc. As noted in the preprint paper, “Does Zinc Supplementation Enhance the Clinical Efficacy of Chloroquine / Hydroxychloroquine to Win Todays Battle Against COVID-19?” published April 8, 2020:12

    “Besides direct antiviral effects, CQ/HCQ [chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine] specifically target extracellular zinc to intracellular lysosomes where it interferes with RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity and coronavirus replication.

    As zinc deficiency frequently occurs in elderly patients and in those with cardiovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, or diabetes, we hypothesize that CQ/HCQ plus zinc supplementation may be more effective in reducing COVID-19 morbidity and mortality than CQ or HCQ in monotherapy. Therefore, CQ/HCQ in combination with zinc should be considered as additional study arm for COVID-19 clinical trials.”

    Chloroquine Trial Stopped Due to Side Effects
    In related news, a Brazilian chloroquine trial13,14 stopped the high-dose arm of the study early due to patients developing ventricular tachychardia, a dangerous heart rhythm problem. As reported by Live Science:15

    “The Brazilian researchers planned to enroll 440 people in their study to test whether chloroquine is a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19. Participants took either a ‘high dose’ of the drug (600 milligrams twice daily for 10 days) or a ‘low dose’ (450 mg for five days, with a double dose only on the first day) …

    However, after enrolling just 81 patients, the researchers saw some concerning signs. Within a few days of starting the treatment, more patients in the high dose group experienced heart rhythm problems than did those in the low dose group. And two patients in the high dose group developed a fast, abnormal heart rate known as ventricular tachychardia before they died.”

    As explained in my previous article, “Antimalarial Medications: A COVID-19 Treatment Option?” chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been shown to be effective in the lab against the SARS coronavirus that appeared in 2003.16,17,18 Laboratory testing also suggests chloroquine is effective in cell cultures against COVID-19 when combined with an antiviral drug, remdesivir.19

    However, chloroquine (Aralen) appears to be a more hazardous choice than hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), which is a derivative of chloroquine.20 Both use the same pathway, but hydroxychloroquine is thought to be about 40% less toxic21 and, overall, has a safer side effect profile.22,23

    Quercetin — A Safer Alternative to Hydroxychloroquine?
    Considering the risks of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, and the evidence suggesting the reason these drugs work for COVID-19 is because they act as zinc ionophores, it’s worth questioning whether other more natural zinc ionophores can be used.

    One prime example would be quercetin, which is a naturally occurring zinc ionophore.24 As reported by the Green Stars Project,25 “Researchers from Oak Ridge National Lab used the world’s most powerful supercomputer, SUMMIT, to look for small molecules that might inhibit the COVID-19 spike protein from interacting with human cells and, interestingly, quercetin is fifth on that list.”26

    Quercetin is one of only three natural products found to inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The only natural product found to be slightly more effective is luteolin, a polyphenol found in radicchio, green peppers, serrano and green hot chili peppers, chicory, celery and many other foods.27

    Quercetin is another flavonols compound found in a variety of foods, including apples, Brassica vegetables, capers, onions, tea and tomatoes, just to name a few. It’s also contained in medicinal products such as Ginko biloba, St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum) and elderberry (Sambucus canadensis).

    Research has already demonstrated that quercetin is a powerful immune booster and broad-spectrum antiviral. As noted in a 2016 study28 in the journal Nutrients, quercetin’s mechanisms of action include the inhibition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) production in macrophages.

    TNF-α is a cytokine involved in systemic inflammation, secreted by activated macrophages, a type of immune cell that digests foreign substances, microbes and other harmful or damaged components. Quercetin also inhibits the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and histamine by modulating calcium influx into the cell.29

    According to this paper, quercetin also stabilizes mast cells and has “a direct regulatory effect on basic functional properties of immune cells,” which allows it to inhibit “a huge panoply of molecular targets in the micromolar concentration range, either by down-regulating or suppressing many inflammatory pathways and functions.”30

    Another 2016 study31 concluded it helps modulate the NLRP3 inflammasome, an immune system component involved in the uncontrolled release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that occurs during a cytokine storm.

    In vitro studies32,33,34 have shown quercetin exerts antiviral activity against SARS-CoV, and preliminary findings35 suggest quercetin can inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 main protease as well. You can get even more details about the anti-inflammatory and antiviral powers of quercetin in “Quercetin Lowers Your Risk for Viral Illnesses.”

    Quercetin Being Studied for Its Use Against COVID-19
    The good news is researchers are in fact planning to study the use of quercetin against COVID-19.36 As reported by Maclean’s,37 Canadian researchers Michel Chrétien and Majambu Mbikay began investigating quercetin in the aftermath of the SARS epidemic that broke out across 26 countries in 2003.

    They discovered a derivative of quercetin provided broad-spectrum protection against a wide range of viruses, including SARS.38,39 The Ebola outbreak in 2014 offered another chance to investigate quercetin’s antiviral powers and, here too, they found it effectively prevented infection in mice, “even when administered only minutes before infection.”

    So, when the COVID-19 outbreak was announced in Wuhan City, China, in late December 2019, Chrétien contacted colleagues in China with an offer to help. In February 2020, Chrétien and his team received an official invitation to begin clinical trials. According to Maclean’s:40

    “The Canadian and Chinese scientists would collaborate on the trials, which would include about 1,000 test patients. Chrétien and Mbikay plan to join colleagues from the non-profit International Consortium of Antivirals — which Chrétien co-founded with Jeremy Carver in 2004 as a response to the SARS epidemic — in manning a 24/7 communications centre as soon as clinical trials go ahead.

    The U.S.-based Food and Drug Administration has already approved quercetin as safe for human consumption, which means the researchers can skip testing on animals. If the treatment works, it’ll be readily available … Chrétien’s team says their treatment would cost only $2 a day.”

    Dosage Recommendations for Quercetin and Zinc
    While the COVID-19 pandemic is in full swing — and for any future influenza season — supplementing with quercetin and zinc may be a good idea for many, in order to boost your immune system’s innate ability to ward off infectious illness. As for dosage, here are some basic recommendations:

    •Quercetin — According to research from Appalachian State University in North Carolina, taking 500 mg to 1,000 mg of quercetin per day for 12 weeks results in “large but highly variable increases in plasma quercetin … unrelated to demographic or lifestyle factors.”41

    •Zinc (and copper) — When it comes to zinc, remember that more is not necessarily better. In fact, it can backfire. When taking zinc, you also need to be mindful of maintaining a healthy zinc-to-copper ratio. As noted by Chris Masterjohn, who has a Ph.D. in nutritional sciences,42 in an article43 and series of Twitter posts:44

    “In one study, 300mg/day of zinc as two divided doses of 150 mg zinc sulfate decreased important markers of immune function, such as the ability of immune cells known as polymorphonuclear leukocytes to migrate toward and consume bacteria.

    The most concerning effect in the context of COVID-19 is that it lowered the lymphocyte stimulation index 3 fold. This is a measure of the ability of T cells to increase their numbers in response to a perceived threat. The reason this is so concerning in the context of COVID-19 is that poor outcomes are associated with low lymphocytes …

    The negative effect on lymphocyte proliferation found with 300 mg/day and the apparent safety in this regard of 150 mg/d suggests that the potential for hurting the immune system may begin somewhere between 150-300 mg/d …

    It is quite possible that the harmful effect of 300 mg/d zinc on the lymphocyte stimulation index is mediated mostly or completely by induction of copper deficiency …

    The negative effect of zinc on copper status has been shown with as little as 60 mg/d zinc. This intake lowers the activity of superoxide dismutase, an enzyme important to antioxidant defense and immune function that depends both on zinc and copper …

    A study done with relatively low intakes of zinc suggested that acceptable ratios of zinc to copper range from 2:1 to 15:1 in favor of zinc. Copper appears safe to consume up to a maximum of 10 mg/d.

    Notably, the maximum amount of zinc one could consume while staying in the acceptable range of zinc-to-copper ratios and also staying within the upper limit for copper is 150 mg/d.”

    How Much Zinc Do You Need?
    Masterjohn goes into even greater detail in his zinc article, discussing maximum absorption rates and much more.45 In summary, he recommends taking 7 mg to 15 mg of zinc four times a day, ideally on an empty stomach, or with a phytate-free food.

    The recommended dietary allowance in the U.S is 11 mg for adult men and 8 mg for adult women, with slightly higher doses recommended for pregnant and breastfeeding women,46 so we’re not talking about taking significantly higher dosages.

    Additionally, you can take one zinc acetate lozenge per day, which will provide you with an additional 18 mg of zinc. If you’re exposed to the virus, take one additional lozenge after the exposure.

    Masterjohn stresses that you’ll want to keep your total zinc intake below 150 mg per day to avoid negative effects on your immune system. He also recommends getting at least 1 mg of copper from food and supplements for every 15 mg of zinc you take.

    Keep in mind that there are many food sources of zinc, so a supplement may not be necessary. I eat about three-fourths of a pound of ground bison or lamb a day, which has 20 mg of zinc. I personally don’t take any zinc supplement other than what I get from my food, which is likely in an optimal form to maximize absorption."

    Sources and References
    1, 6 Medrxiv.org April 14, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558 [Preprint]
    2 Medrxiv.org April 14, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558 [Preprint] (PDF full study)
    3, 8 Emcrit.org April 16, 2020
    4 Reason April 16, 2020
    5 Medrxiv.org April 14, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.10.20060558 [Preprint] (PDF) Table 2, Page 37
    7 FDA.gov Fact Sheet, EUA of Hydroxychloroquine (PDF)
    9 PLOS ONE 2014; 9(10): e109180
    10, 11, 12 Preprints April 6, 2020 DOI: 10.20944/preprints202004.0124.v1
    13 Medrxiv.org April 11, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.07.20056424
    14 Medrxiv.org April 11, 2020 DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.07.20056424 (PDF full study)
    15 Live Science April 13, 2020
    16 Antiviral Research, 2020;177:104762 Highlight bullest
    17 Clinical Infectious Disease, 2020; 10.1093/cid/ciaa237 Abstract
    18 Virology Journal, 2005;2(69) Abstract/Conclusion
    19 Cell Research, 2020;30:269 Abstract
    20, 21 Nature March 18, 2020; 6 Article number 16, Correspondence
    22 Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020; doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa237 Abstract
    23 Medicinenet.com Chloroquine vs Hydroxychloroquine
    24 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2014, 62, 32, 8085-8093
    25 Greenstarsproject.org March 27, 2020
    26 ChemRxiv.org March 11, 2020 (PDF full study), Table 3
    27 Myintakepro.com Luteolin Rich Foods
    28, 30 Nutrients 2016 Mar; 8(3): 167, 5.1.2 Mechanism of Action
    29 Nutrients 2016 Mar; 8(3): 167, Table 1: Mast cell
    31 Mediators of Inflammation 2016; 2016, Article ID 5460302
    32 Journal of Virology October 2004: 11334-11339 (PDF)
    33 Biotechnology Letters February 15, 2012; 34: 831-838
    34 Bioorg Med Chem 2010 Nov 15;18(22):7940-7
    35 Preprints.org March 12, 2020
    36 CBC February 28, 2020
    37, 40 Maclean’s February 24, 2020
    38 Bioorg Med Chem. 2006 Dec 15;14(24):8295-306
    39 Journal of Virology Sep 2004, 78 (20) 11334-11339, Antiviral activity of an analog of luteolin
    41 Appalachian State University, The Variable Plasma Quercetin response to 12-Week Quercetin Supplementation (PDF)
    42 Chrismasterjohnphd.com
    43, 45 Chrismasterjohnphd.com Best Dose of Zinc for COVID-19 Prevention
    44 Twitter, Chris Masterjohn April 10, 2020
    46 NIH Zinc Fact Sheet


    Thanks for this post. This is very important as it emphasises that the zinc stops cell virus reproduction, the cells need elevated levels of zinc and the quinine assists to get the zinc in. What this strongly implies is that for any virus pandemic people need to go on a low dose quinine and zinc regime (or maybe Quercetin) to prevent spread. There you have it, the cheap supplement that chokes off virus production in our body is being excluded from the research - putting people on such a preventative regime for a few weeks would likely cost less that a covid test or the vax
    Last edited by Baby Steps; 30th May 2020 at 12:15.
    we have subcontracted the business of healing people to Companies who profit from sickness.

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Baby Steps For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), onawah (31st May 2020), Sunny (31st May 2020), wondering (6th June 2020)

  25. Link to Post #293
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,486
    Thanks
    53,904
    Thanked 137,710 times in 23,921 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    COVID-19 Critical Care
    Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked
    May 29, 2020
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a..._rid=882417554

    (Vimeo at the link)

    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    Despite the fact that many critical care specialists are using treatment protocols that differ from standard of care, information about natural therapeutics in particular are still being suppressed by the media and is not received by critical care physicians
    Five critical care physicians have formed the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group (FLCCC). The group has developed a highly effective treatment protocol known as MATH+
    Of the more than 100 hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with the MATH+ protocol as of mid-April, only two died. Both were in their 80s and had advanced chronic medical conditions
    The protocols call for the use of intravenous methylprednisolone, vitamin C and subcutaneous heparin within six hours of admission into the hospital, along with high-flow nasal oxygen. Optional additions include thiamine, zinc and vitamin D
    COVID-19 kills by triggering hyperinflammation, hypercoagulation and hypoxia. The MATH+ protocol addresses these three core pathological processes
    "Why is success in critical care being ignored?" the Alliance for Natural Health rightly asks.1 The organization claims "much more could be done to save lives" if critical care protocols were to take into account what critical care doctors are finding in practice. A May 14, 2020, article reads, in part:2

    "After around 8 weeks in lockdown and 3 months since the spectre of Covid-19 loomed large in our media headlines, why is it that a team of frontline critical (intensive) care doctors in the USA who have delivered close to 100% survival with their unique protocol being roundly ignored?

    Wouldn't you think that hospitals and governments would be biting their hands off to get a hold of their protocol? Or clamoring for more information and training to understand why their own outcomes from standard care fall so far short, delivering around just 50% survival in most critical care settings? …

    It's now very clear that the outcomes among the very seriously ill patients in critical care units (also referred to as ICU [intensive care units]/ITU [intensive therapy units] in the UK) are being used to inform lockdown (or lock up!) strategy and keep the fear levels sufficiently high to ensure citizen compliance …

    Why is there such widespread censorship of anything but the party line by online platforms which lack sufficient expertise to adjudicate on matters of science and medicine?

    The public-facing narrative continues to profess that there is nothing you can do to support your immune system, there is nothing in the natural arsenal for Covid-19 … social distancing must be maintained at all times and that the only cure for this terrifying infection will magically come from a vaccine created at warp speed.

    When you add these untruths to the plans being rolled out for ramping up citizen surveillance through test, track and trace, the erosion of our rights and freedoms through the emergency coronavirus legislation, the destruction of economies and the forced reliance of so many on the state for survival handouts, you realize how much we might lose whilst much of the world cowers behind closed doors in fear."

    Front-Line Critical Care Working Group
    As noted by the Alliance for Natural Health, despite the fact that "the obstacle course posed by the peer review process to scientific publication has been removed," and despite many critical care specialists using treatment protocols that differ from standard of care, information about natural therapeutics in particular are still being suppressed by the media and is not received by those who need it most — critical care physicians.

    "We all need to be asking why. After all, people are dying. How would it make relatives feel if it was found that their loved one had died needlessly just because the doctors who were having greatest success were not being listened to and their innovative protocols had been systematically ignored?" Alliance for Natural Health states.3

    According to the article, efforts by Dr. Pierre Kory — medical director at the Trauma & Life Support Center and a faculty member in the Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in the Department of Medicine at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health — to share the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group's4 (FLCCC) successes with other health care professionals have so far come to naught.

    Kory was one of five doctors participating in a May 6, 2020, roundtable discussion5 on COVID-19 with ranking senate committee member Gary Peters, D-Mich. In his testimony, Kory states, in part:6

    "I want to start by saying that I am part of a group of physicians which include several of the most highly published and well-known critical care experts in the country and world (Drs. Paul Marik, Umberto Meduri, Joseph Varon and José Iglesias). In response to the COVID crisis we formed the Front-Line Critical Care Working group …

    Members of our group have now treated in excess of 100 hospitalized patients with our treatment protocol. Nearly all survived. The two that died were in their 80s and had advanced chronic medical conditions.

    None of the patients have had long stays on the ventilator nor become ventilator dependent. The patients generally have a short hospital stay and are discharged in good health …

    Our protocol has been out over four weeks. It is not unique, in fact, we are not alone in what we propose or have been trying … In fact, we are seeing an increasing number of similar protocols with nearly identical therapeutics come out from various institutions and countries, including the Italian guidelines, Chinese guidelines, Yale protocol, Montefiore protocol and others.

    We are doctors, trained to diagnose and treat illness, we are experts in our field with decades of experience and hundreds of publications … We have clearly devised an effective treatment for use, prior to the publication of randomized controlled trials.

    Those trials are critical for sure, as they will help us further refine and/or perfect our treatment doses, durations, and indications, but waiting for the perfect is and will be the enemy of the good, which we are already achieving … We just want to save lives, and we know how to do it."COVID-19 Early Intervention Protocol
    According to Kory, the FLCCCs MATH+ protocol has been delivered to the White House on four occasions, yet no interest has been shown. Worse, he says they continue to be stonewalled by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute for Health. Why?

    Isn't saving lives, right now, and by any means possible, more important than pushing for a vaccine? If the MATH+ protocol works with near-100% effectiveness, a vaccine may not even be necessary. The MATH+ protocol gets its name from:

    Intravenous Methylprednisolone

    High-dose intravenous Ascorbic acid

    Plus optional treatments Thiamine, zinc and vitamin D

    Full dose low molecular weight Heparin

    Kory's testimony transcript reviews and summarizes the MATH+ protocol, and explains why the timing of the treatment is so important. As explained by Kory, there are two distinct yet overlapping phases of COVID-19 infection.

    Phase 1 is the viral replication phase. Typically, patients will only experience mild symptoms, if any, during this phase. At this time, it's important to focus on antiviral therapies.
    In Phase 2, the hyperinflammatory immune response sets in, which can result in organ failures (lungs, brain, heart and kidneys). The MATH+ protocol is designed to treat this active phase, but it needs to be administered early enough.
    The MATH+ Protocol
    The MATH+ protocol7 calls for the use of three medicines, all of which need to be started within six hours of hospital admission:

    Intravenous methylprednisolone, to suppress the immune system and prevent organ damage from cytokine storms — For mild hypoxia, 40 milligrams (mg) daily until off oxygen; moderate to severe illness, 80 mg bolus followed by 20 mg per day for seven days. On Day 8, switch to oral prednisone and taper down over the next six days.
    Intravenous ascorbic acid (vitamin C), to control inflammation and prevent the development of leaky blood vessels in the lungs — 3 grams/100 ml every six hours for up to seven days.
    Subcutaneous heparin (enoxaparin), to thin the blood and prevent blood clots — For mild to moderate illness, 40 mg to 60 mg daily until discharged.
    Optional additions include thiamine, zinc and vitamin D. In addition to these medications, the protocol calls for high-flow nasal oxygen to avoid mechanical ventilation, "which itself damages the lungs and is associated with a mortality rate approaching nearly 90% in some centers," Kory notes.8

    Together, this approach addresses the three core pathological processes seen in COVID-19, namely hyperinflammation, hypercoagulability of the blood, and hypoxia (shortness of breath due to low oxygenation).

    COVID-19 Should Not Be Treated as ARDS
    In the video, Dr. Paul Marik points out that it's crucial for doctors to treat each patient as an individual case, as COVID-19 is not conventional acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

    If the patient is assumed to have ARDS and placed on a ventilator, you're likely going to damage their lungs. Indeed, research has now shown that patients placed on mechanical ventilation have far higher mortality rates than patients who are not ventilated. While not discussed here, some doctors are also incorporating hyperbaric oxygen treatment in lieu of ventilation, with great success.

    The reason for this is because the primary problem is inflammation, not fluid in the lungs. So, Marik says, they need anti-inflammatory drugs. "It's not the virus that is hurting the host, it's the acute inflammatory dysregulated response," he says. "That's why you need to use vitamin C and steroids." He points out that steroids play a crucial role, as it creates synergy with vitamin C.

    COVID-19 patients also have a hypercoagulation problem, so they need anticoagulants. In addition to using the proper medication, they must also be treated early. "You have to intervene early and aggressively to prevent them from deteriorating," Marik says.

    Methylprednisolone May Be a Crucial Component
    Kory expresses concerns over the fact that health organizations around the world are warning doctors against the use of corticosteroids, calling this a "tragic error"9 as "COVID-19 is a steroid-responsive disease."10 In his testimony, he points out:11

    "Sorin Draghici, CEO of Advaita Bioinformatics, just reported12 that their incredibly sophisticated Artificial Intelligence platform called iPathwayGuide, using cultured human cell lines infected with COVID-19, is able to map all the human genes which are activated by this virus …

    Note almost all the activated genes are those that express triggers of inflammation. With this knowledge of the specific COVID inflammatory gene activation combined with knowledge of the gene suppression activity of all known medicines they were able to match the most effective drug for COVID-19 human gene suppression, and that drug is methylprednisolone.

    This must be recognized, as the ability of other corticosteroids to control inflammation in COVID-19 was much less impactful. This is, we believe, an absolutely critical and historic finding. Many centers are using similar but less effective agents such as dexamethasone or prednisone."

    As noted by Kory in his senate testimony, Marik, chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at the Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Virginia, is a member of the FLCCC.13 You may recall that Marik was the one who in 2017 announced he had developed an extraordinarily effective treatment against sepsis.

    Marik's sepsis protocol also calls for intravenous vitamin C and a steroid, in this case hydrocortisone, along with thiamine. I for one am not surprised that the two protocols are so similar, seeing how sepsis is also a major cause of death in severe COVID-19 cases.

    Safe and Effective Treatments Must Not Be Ignored
    As noted by Marik in the video, COVID-19 is not regular ARDS and should not be treated as such. What kills people with COVID-19 is the inflammation, and steroids in combination with vitamin C work synergistically together to control and regulate that inflammation. The heparin, meanwhile, addresses the hypercoagulation that causes blood clots, which is a unique feature of COVID-19. As for the "lack of studies" supporting their protocol, FLCCC notes:14

    "A number of official guidelines, such as those of the WHO and several other U.S. agencies, recommend limiting treatment for … critically ill patients to 'supportive care only' — and to allow the therapies described here to be studied in randomized controlled trials where half of the patients would receive placebo and where the results would come in months or years.

    Our physicians agree that while a randomized controlled trial (RCT), under normal circumstances, might be considered, the early provisions of MATH+, which must be given within hours of critical illness, would inevitably be delayed by such a study design, rendering the validity of the RCT questionable.

    Furthermore, while the results of an RCT would not be available for months or more, well-designed observational studies of the protocol could yield timely feedback during this pandemic, to improve the treatment process much more quickly."

    I believe this information needs to be shared far and wide, if we are to prevent more people from dying unnecessarily. More and more, as doctors are starting to speak openly about their clinical findings, we're seeing that there are quite a few different ways to tackle this illness without novel antivirals or vaccines, using older, inexpensive and readily available medications that are already known to be safe. "

    + Sources and References
    1, 2, 3 Alliance for Natural Health May 14, 2020
    4, 13 covid19criticalcare.com
    5 US Senate May 6, 2020
    6, 8, 9, 11 Dr. Pierre Kory Senate Testimony May 6, 2020 (PDF)
    7 MATH+ Protocol (PDF)
    10, 14 Vimeo COVID-19 Early Intervention Treatment Protocol
    12 Wayne State University April 30, 2020
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Franny (10th June 2020), Hym (5th June 2020), Rhydwyn (9th June 2020), Sunny (31st May 2020)

  27. Link to Post #294
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,398 times in 4,672 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Yale Epidemiologist: Hydroxychloroquine Should Be 'Widely Available And Promoted Immediately' As Standard Treatment

    by Tyler Durden
    Sun, 05/31/2020 - 17:20

    Hydroxychloroqine - a cheap, widely-prescribed anti-malaria drug which was deemed safe for decades until it showed efficacy treating coronavirus - needs to be made "widely available and promoted immediately for physicians to prescribe," according to Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch.



    In a Wedensday manuscript detailing how high-risk COVID-19 patients should be treated, Risch notes that the combination of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and the antibiotic azithromycin (AZ) "has been widely misrepresented in both clinical reportsand public media," and that "Five studies, including two controlled clinical trials, have demonstrated significant major outpatient treatment efficacy."
    Hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin has been used as standard-of-care in more than 300,000 older adults with multi comorbidities, with estimated proportion diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias attributable to the medications 47/100,000 users, of which estimated mortality is <20%, 9/100,000 users, compared to the 10,000 Americans now dying each week. These medications need to be widely available and promoted immediately for physicians to prescribe.
    - Dr. Harvey Risch
    Risch recommends the combination of HCQ+AZ "preferably with zinc" as a "standard outpatient treatment, at least until we find or add something better, whether that could be remdesivir or something else."

    The manuscript flies in the face of mainstream health authorities, which has staged a full court press against HCQ, while promoting Gilead's (very expensive) remdesivir as the only viable option to treat the COVID-19. Medical experts - including Dr. Anthony Fauci of the White House coronavirus task force have cautioned against taking the drug despite its successful use by doctors around the world, who have claimed dramatic improvement in patients with coronavirus.
    "Every patient I've prescribed it to has been very, very ill and within 8 to 12 hours, they were basically symptom-free," said Los Angeles doctor Dr. Anthony Cardillo, adding

    "So clinically I am seeing a resolution."
    In mid-May, President Trump admitted to taking HCQ + Zinc right around the time VP Mike Pence's Press Secretary, Katie Miller, tested positive for the virus.

    Read Risch's manuscript below:

    https://academic.oup.com/aje/advance...waa093/5847586

    https://www.zerohedge.com/health/yal...ed-immediately
    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 3rd June 2020 at 12:34.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Billy (9th June 2020), onevoice (7th June 2020), Sunny (3rd June 2020)

  29. Link to Post #295
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,398 times in 4,672 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Lancet, New England Journal retract Covid-19 studies, including one that raised safety concerns about malaria drugs

    Andrew Joseph
    Stat News
    Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00 UTC


    © GEORGE FREY/AFP via Getty Images

    The Lancet, one of the world's top medical journals, on Thursday retracted an influential study that raised alarms about the safety of the experimental Covid-19 treatments chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine amid scrutiny of the data underlying the paper.

    Just over an hour later, the New England Journal of Medicine retracted a separate study, focused on blood pressure medications in Covid-19, that relied on data from the same company.

    The retractions came at the request of the authors of the studies, published last month, who were not directly involved with the data collection and sources, the journals said.

    "We can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources," Mandeep Mehra of Brigham and Women's Hospital, Frank Ruschitzka of University Hospital Zurich, and Amit Patel of University of Utah said in a statement issued by the Lancet. "Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted."

    The retraction of the Lancet paper is sure to add fuel to contentious arguments about the potential of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, two old malaria drugs, in Covid-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. President Trump has touted them as valuable treatments, despite a lack of rigorous data showing they have a benefit.

    Meanwhile, on Wednesday, researchers reported the results of the first gold-standard clinical trial of hydroxycholoroquine in Covid-19, concluding that it did not prevent infections any better than placebo. Other clinical trials, including some looking at the drugs as treatments, are ongoing.

    The Lancet study gained so much attention because it went further than other observational studies that had similarly found the drugs were not associated with improved outcomes for patients. The study, which was purportedly based on patient data from 671 hospitals on six continents, reported the drugs also corresponded to higher mortality.

    The findings led to the pause of some global clinical trials studying hydroxychloroquine so researchers could check for any safety concerns. Outside experts, however, quickly raised concerns after noticing inconsistencies in the data. They asked the company that compiled and analyzed the data, Surgisphere, to explain how it sourced its data.

    As scrutiny grew, the authors on the paper not affiliated with Surgisphere called for an independent audit. In their Lancet statement Thursday, they said that Surgisphere was not cooperating with the independent reviewers and would not provide the data.

    "As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process," the researchers wrote.


    Related:

  30. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (5th June 2020), Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Billy (9th June 2020), Ernie Nemeth (5th June 2020), fractal being (5th June 2020), Sarah Rainsong (5th June 2020), spade (6th June 2020), Sunny (5th June 2020), wondering (6th June 2020)

  31. Link to Post #296
    Indonesia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th June 2018
    Age
    48
    Posts
    307
    Thanks
    701
    Thanked 1,620 times in 274 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Bill and Melinda Gaettez are the Lancet's funders - isn't it obvious? I was watching the most mainstream normal doctor (but a very thorough and "fundamentally sound" one) talk about this - he was covering the whole CCP/Gates virus outbreak since the beginning with utmost objectivity and with completely no sense of the magnitude of corruption taking place). And the look of a mental shattering of the highest order of trust in the medical journal (deemed to hold the greatest level of "integrity") - is priceless.

    skip to time frame 2:56, and I stopped after he started endorsing the Measles vacc mandate thereafter.



    I couldn't pull myself together for quite a bit...

  32. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to spade For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th June 2020), Billy (9th June 2020), Franny (10th June 2020), Gwin Ru (6th June 2020), justntime2learn (6th June 2020), Sarah Rainsong (6th June 2020)

  33. Link to Post #297
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,486
    Thanks
    53,904
    Thanked 137,710 times in 23,921 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Lancet Editor Spills the Beans
    by Vera Sharav
    Alliance for Human Research Protection
    6/7/20
    (MORE HYPERLINKS IN THE ARTICLE)
    Editors of The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine: Pharmaceutical Companies are so Financially Powerful They Pressure us to Accept Papers
    https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/edito...accept-papers/

    Philippe Douste-Blazy, MD, is a cardiologist and former French Health Minister who served as Under-Secretary General of the United Nations. He was a candidate in 2017 for Director of the World Health Organization.

    "In a videotaped interview on May 24, 2020, Dr. Douste-Blazy provided insight into how a series of negative hydroxychloroquine studies got published in prestigious medical journals.


    He revealed that at a recent Chatham House top secret, closed door meeting attended by experts only, the editors of both, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine expressed their exasperation citing the pressures put on them by pharmaceutical companies.

    He states that each of the editors used the word “criminal” to describe the erosion of science.

    He quotes Dr. Richard Horton who bemoaned the current state of science:

    “If this continues, we are not going to be able to publish any more clinical research data because pharmaceutical companies are so financially powerful; they are able to pressure us to accept papers that are apparently methodologically perfect, but their conclusion is what pharmaceutical companies want.”


    Dr. Richard Horton
    Dr. Douste-Blazy supports the combination treatment –hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) for Covid-19 recommended by Dr. Didier Raoult. In April, 2020

    Dr. Douste-Blazy started a petition that has been signed by almost 500,000 French doctors and citizens urging French government officials to permit physicians to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus patients early, before they require intensive care.

    The issue has become highly politicized; the left-leaning politicians and public health officials are adamantly against the use of HCQ, whereas those leaning toward the right politically are for the right of doctors to prescribe the drug as they see fit.

    The journal SCIENCE described the response to French President Emmanuel Macron trip to Marseille to meet Dr. Raoult who prescribes the combination drug regimen and he has documented their effectiveness.

    However, public health officials, academic physicians and the media – all of who are financially indebted to pharmaceutical companies and their high profit marketing objectives – vehemently oppose the use of HCQ, and use every opportunity to disparage the drug by derisively referring to President Trump as its booster.

    The Lancet Published a Fraudulent Study: Editor Calls it “Department of Error”
    by Vera Sharav
    Alliance for Human Research Protection

    On May 22, 2020, The Lancet published “Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine With or Without A Macrolide For Treatment of COVID-19: a Multinational Registry Analysis”. It was described as an observational study purportedly involving more than 96,000 hospitalized Covid-19 patients in 671 hospitals across six continents. What was not disclosed is the fact that the two lead co-authors have significant, relevant financial conflicts of interest that just may have biased the reported findings.




    The database belongs to Surgisphere Corporation whose founder and CEO, is Dr. Sapan Desai, who is a lead co-author of the study. Dr. Desai has refused to disclose the data – for independent confirmatory review. In fact, he refuses to identify the participating hospitals, or even the countries.
    Dr. Mandeep Mehra, the lead co-author is a director at Brigham & Women’s Hospital, which is credited with funding the study. Dr. Mehra and The Lancet failed to disclose that Brigham Hospital has a partnership with Gilead and is currently conducting TWO trials testing Remdesivir, the prime competitor of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, the focus of the study.
    https://www.brighamhealthonamission....s-hospital/The Lancet report claimed that COVID-19 “patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (with or without a macrolide) were at increased risk of de-novo ventricular arrhythmia and ‘a greater hazard for in-hospital death.’” Such an alarming finding from an inaccessible dataset should have raised concerns for the editor of the Lancet, about the integrity of the study and the accuracy of the claimed findings. In fact, within days of the Lancet publication, concerns about that dataset were raised on social media, on PubPeer, the post-publication discussion website, and in newspapers.

    Within days of publication, Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) declared on CNN

    “The scientific data is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy.”

    A media blitz against hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) created panic: clinical trials aimed at testing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 were suspended by International public health institutions including the World Health Organization the UK government regulatory agency and the French government.

    The chief scientist at the WHO, Soumya Swaminathan, stated that although the Lancet data weren’t from a randomized controlled trial, the data were compelling because they

    “came from multiple registries and quite a large number of patients, 96,000 patients.”

    Knowledgeable scientists and experienced clinicians around the world were skeptical
    The alarming findings and serious negative impact of the Lancet report led numerous scientists around the globe to scrutinize the report in detail. That scrutiny by legitimate, independent scientists has led to many serious questions about the integrity of the study, the authenticity of the data, and the validity of the methods the authors used.

    An Open Letter posted online, is addressed to the authors of the report: Mandeep R Mehra, MD, Sapan S Desai, MD, Frank Ruschitzka, MD, Amit N Patel, MD, and to the editor, Dr. Richard Horton. The letter was signed by more than 200 prominent scientists across the world, including 17 from institutions in Africa.

    The scientists question the evidence for claimed serious risks posed from the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients. Among the concerns raised by the scientists are the following:

    A range of gross deviations from standard research and clinical practices, such as: patients were prescribed inexplicably high daily doses of hydroxychloroquine –far higher than the FDA-recommended doses.
    There was no ethics review.
    The number of patients reportedly from Australia far exceeded the number of patients in the Australian government database;.
    Gross misrepresentation of the numbers of deaths in Australia.
    “Both the number of cases and deaths [the claimed 40% deaths in Africa], and the details provide seem unlikely.”
    Refusal to identify the hospitals that contributed patient data.
    The ratios of patients who received chloroquine (49 %) to those who received hydroxychloroquine (50% ) are implausible; in Australia chloroquine is not available without special government authorization.
    The Guardian reported on May 28th that it could not confirm that UK’s health agencies had even provided data for the study.

    On May 29th The New York Times reported that 100 scientists and clinicians raised serious questions about the validity of the The Lancet report findings. It reported that on May 29th Dr. Mehra issued the following statement:

    “We leveraged the data available through Surgisphere to provide observational guidance to inform the care of hospitalized Covid-19 patients”

    [Perhaps someone can translate what “leveraged the data” means ….? The Times understated the number of scientists who signed the open letter; it is closer to 220.]


    Dr. James Watson, senior scientist at the MORU-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit in Thailand doubts that any research organization could have obtained such detailed massive records for so many people in Africa that quickly. Based on healthcare workers’ descriptions of medical record-keeping, at many hospitals in Africa, he indicated:

    “I just find it very hard to believe.”

    Dr. Watson contributed concerns regarding the African data to the Open Letter. He had to suspend a just-launched trial of HCQ to comply with UK regulators following the Lancet report.
    Dr. Anthony Etyang, a consultant physician and clinical epidemiologist with the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kenya, who is also a signatory to the Open Letter, wrote to The Scientist expressing his doubts about the numbers of African patients in the Surgisphere dataset, noting that even private hospitals on the continent have poor medical records.

    Rather than investigating the serious issues raised about the integrity of the report, The Lancet editor posted the authors’ claimed to “correction” of the numbers of patients in Asia and Australia on a page designated “Department of Error” – whatever that means!

    The nature and number of the serious “discrepancies” that have emerged following the Lancet publication of the Surgisphere “study,” lead one to suspect out-and-out FRAUD.Disputed
    Hydroxychloroquine Study Brings Scrutiny to Surgisphere, Disputed Hydroxychloroquine Study Brings Scrutiny to Surgisphere, an investigative report by Catherine Offord in The SCIENTIST, May 30, 2020, looked deeper than others and uncovered background information about Dr. Desai and the changes in Surgisphere’s product line and his marketing methods. In 2008, Surgisphere was the publisher of medical textbooks that ran afoul when physicians complained about falsified rave reviews. In 2010, Surgisphere became a high impact, online medical journal, whose website boasts that it

    “accrued over 50,000 subscribers spanning almost every country around the world… with almost one million page views per month.”

    The Journal of Surgical Radiology had a three-year run; its last issue was published in January 2013.

    The Scientist reports that Dr. Desai is named in three medical malpractice lawsuits that were filed during the second half of 2019.

    Additional disturbing facts about Surgisphere have been uncovered by a team of investigative reporters — Melissa Davey, Stephanie Kirchgaessner, and Sarah Boseley – for The Guardian. an investigative report by Catherine Offord in The SCIENTIST, May 30, 2020, looked deeper than others and uncovered background information about Dr. Desai and the changes in Surgisphere’s product line and his marketing methods. In 2008, Surgisphere was the publisher of medical textbooks that ran afoul when physicians complained about falsified rave reviews. In 2010, Surgisphere became a high impact, online medical journal, whose website boasts that it

    “accrued over 50,000 subscribers spanning almost every country around the world… with almost one million page views per month.”

    The Journal of Surgical Radiology had a three-year run; its last issue was published in January 2013.

    The Scientist reports that Dr. Desai is named in three medical malpractice lawsuits that were filed during the second half of 2019.

    Additional disturbing facts about Surgisphere have been uncovered by a team of investigative reporters — Melissa Davey, Stephanie Kirchgaessner, and Sarah Boseley – for The Guardian.

    Surgisphere, the company that provided the database for studies published by two of the world’s leading medical journals – The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine – based on Surgisphere data. The studies were co-authored the hydroxychloroquine studies.

    “Surgisphere’s employees have little or no data or scientific background. An employee listed as a science editor appears to be a science fiction author and fantasy artist. Another employee listed as a marketing executive is an adult model and events hostess… until Monday, the “get in touch” link on Surgisphere’s homepage redirected to a WordPress template for a cryptocurrency website, raising questions about how hospitals could easily contact the company to join its database.”

    The fiasco of the publication of essentially fraudulent reports in the journals with the greatest impact on both clinical treatment and public health policies, reveals how thoroughly corrupted so-called peer review has become because it lacks external, independent review by scientists who have NO STAKE in the study outcome. It was only after the reports by The Scientist andThe Guardian, that the editors of The NEJM and The Lancet were compelled to issue an: “Expression of concern.” This fiasco demonstrates why intelligent people seek alternative sources for reliable information.

    The website, Science Defies Politics exposes numerous scientifically invalid studies that were essentially “hit jobs” against the use of hydroxychloroquine.

    WHY are very powerful corporate-government stakeholders so intent on killing a drug with a 70 year track record? Because the drug works against the pandemic; it is readily available, and costs very little. Therefore, it poses a financial threat to both pharma companies and their partners in government and academia, those who are intent on profiting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    As uncovered by Science Defies Politics: 16 of the panel members selected by NIH to formulate the official COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines – including two of the three co-chairs – were paid by Gilead. They issued guidelines that raised fear, uncertainty, and doubt about the use of HCQ combined with AZ, while raising no fear, doubt, or uncertainty about using Gilead’s unproven, unapproved, drug remdesivir; a drug that has shown mediocre performance in clinical trials. Seven of the NIH panelists failed to disclose their financial ties to Gilead. They are listed here.

    The medical scientific literature is infested with financially motivated, shoddy, studies aimed at promoting products and, when a life-saving, non-patentable product, proves effective, scientists are hired to author study reports that are designed to tarnish scientists’ reputations, and to proclaim findings that refute legitimate findings. In this case, studies designed to “debunk” the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine against COVID-19.

    Examples of countries and physicians who have witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ – Az combination as a treatment for covid-19, are viewed by corporate-government collaborating partners as posing a major threat to their marketing agendas.

    For example, Senegal and India are putting their hopes in hydroxychloroquine, marketed by Sanofi, under the trade name Plaquenil. A Sanofi spokesperson stated:

    “We are providing the drug to hospitals and doctors to enable them to carry out clinical trials to determine whether hydroxychloroquine is effective or not, but not to treat Covid-19.”

    On May 23rd the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) issued expanded revised guidelines for use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for COVID-19:

    “The Joint Monitoring Group and the NTF have recommended prophylactic use of HCQ in asymptomatic frontline workers, such as surveillance workers deployed in containment zones and paramilitary/police personnel involved in Covid-19 related activities, asymptomatic household contacts of laboratory confirmed cases and all asymptomatic healthcare workers involved in containment and treatment of Covid-19 and working in non-Covid hospitals/non-Covid areas of Covid hospitals/blocks.”

    Didier Raoult, MD, PhD — “a Science Star” — as the NYT described him in a recent profile, who has identified 500 novel species of human-borne bacteria; a scientist known all over the world as the discoverer of the first giant virus, a discovery that earned him the Grand Prix, one of France’s most prestigious awards.Dr. Raoult is the founder and director of the research hospital, the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection (IHU). He is a professor on the faculty of Medicine of Ais-Marseille University, and since 2008, he has been the director of the Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit), which employs more than 200 people and runs a hospital with 3,700 patients. He has more than 2,300 indexed publications and was classified among the ten leading French researchers by the journal Nature. Dr. Raoult has a reputation for bluster but also for creativity that others lack. As the Times noted, “He looks where no one else cares to, with methods no one else is using, and [he] finds things.”

    Since publishing favorable reports about a treatment combination of two cheap, widely prescribed medicines: hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin, as a treatment of choice against Covid-19, Dr. Raoult has become the subject of intense demonization by the corporate-influenced medical establishment, the media, and the who resort to this tactic whenever they lack evidence or legitimate grounds to support public health policies that cause people harm. Their fallback tactic is to demonize every doctor who challenges them and refuses to adhere to their financially – driven prescribing decrees.

    Dr. Raoult’s latest scientific report about HCQ, Early Diagnosis and Management of COVID-19 Patients: A Real-Life Cohort study of 3,737 Patients, Marseille, France was posted on May 27, 2020,

    It is a retrospective study report of the clinical management of 3,737 patients, including 3,054 (81.7%) treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin (HCQ-AZ) for at least three days and 683 (18.3%) patients treated with other methods. Outcomes were death, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), ≥ 10 days of hospitalization and viral shedding.

    “Treatment with HCQ-AZ was associated with a decreased risk of transfer to the ICU or death (HR 0.19 0.12-0.29), decreased risk of hospitalization ≥10 days (odds ratios 95% CI 0.37 0.26-0.51) and shorter duration of viral shedding (time to negative PCR: HR 1.27 1.16-1.39). QTc prolongation (>60 ms) was observed in 25 patients (0.67%) leading to the cessation of treatment in 3 cases. No cases of torsade de pointe or sudden death were observed.

    Conclusion
    Early diagnosis, early isolation and early treatment with at least 3 days of HCQ-AZ result in a significantly better clinical outcome and contagiosity in patients with COVID-19 than other treatments.”
    In France, doctors who have followed the research of Dr. Raoult, and have themselves witnessed the effectiveness of the HCQ-AZ combination, are suing the government. They demand the right to treat their patients with these drugs before easing of the lockdown. They seek to prevent complications and deaths from a second wave of Covid-19.

    Dr. Violaine Guérin, an endocrinologist who conducted a trial on 100 doctors infected with COVID-19, and their families, reported her study findings that demonstrated the effectiveness of prescribing HCQ combined with azithromycin at the first sign of symptoms. The drugs substantially reduced the viral load of Covid-19:

    “Taking hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on the outset of flu symptoms can prevent Covid-19 from getting worse. We can treat people now before they end up on a ventilator.”

    Her findings replicated those Dr. Didier Raoult.

    Dr. Guérin recommends prescribing hydroxychloroquine for health workers infected by the coronavirus, which is outside of its approved uses. Health unions in France warned that almost 12,000 health care professionals out of 550,000 – roughly a quarter of the country’s health force – were sick with Covid-19. Dr. Guérin recommends its use on compassionate grounds, stating:

    “From the very beginning, doctors have been calling for the right to self-prescribe because they are the ones on the frontline of the coronavirus battle. We cannot waste time when we can treat Covid-19 now, as long as this is done in the early stages of the virus and patients are screened for pre-existing medical conditions.”

    Soon after this favorable study was published, the Minister of Health Olivier Veran in bald political arm twisting fashion, asked the highest health authority to review its authorization for the use of HCQ to treat Covid, suggesting further restriction.

    Read the full article at AHRP.org.https://ahrp.org/the-lancet-publishe...ment-of-error/

    Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1359817
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Billy (9th June 2020), fractal being (7th June 2020), Franny (10th June 2020), Gwin Ru (7th June 2020), Harmony (7th June 2020), onevoice (7th June 2020), Sunny (8th June 2020), wondering (9th June 2020)

  35. Link to Post #298
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,486
    Thanks
    53,904
    Thanked 137,710 times in 23,921 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    Lancet & NEJM Retract Studies Finding HCQ Deadly & Ineffective
    Medical Scandal of the Decade Erupts as Lancet and NEJM Both Retract Studies Finding Hydroxychloriquine Deadly and Ineffective
    Politicized Science: Lancet, NEJM retract studies on Hydroxychloriquine
    BY Celia Farber
    6/6/20

    "At 3:15 pm on June 4, I got a text from my friend Josh in Los Angeles that stopped me in my tracks.

    The text read: “The fake Lancet Hydroxychloroquine study has been retracted.”

    I called Josh. “Are you serious?”

    He’d already texted me the retraction, but still I could barely believe it. Turns out NEJM had also retracted. This was huge.

    Dr. James Todaro, who runs a website, MedicineUncensored, which publishes the results of HCQ studies, tweeted yesterday:

    “This is exploding into one of the most twisted and unbelievable medical scandals of the decade.” Todaro (and social media “sleuths”) were the first to expose the truth, in late May on his site:

    https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/st...ejm-retract%2F

    Quote James Todaro, MD
    @JamesTodaroMD
    ·
    Jun 4
    BOOM. Lancet study on hydroxychloroquine retracted.

    Published study existed for only 13 days.

    Did Twitter peer-review result in the quickest retraction ever for a study of this magnitude? #LancetGate
    Quote Tweet

    The Lancet
    @TheLancet
    · Jun 4
    Today, three of the authors have retracted "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis" Read the Retraction notice and statement from The Lancet https://hubs.ly/H0r7gh50
    Quote James Todaro, MD

    @JamesTodaroMD
    First detailed investigation into Surgisphere reported here:
    https://www.medicineuncensored.com/a...ut-of-thin-air
    UncoverDC reached out to Dr. Todaro to confirm that he was the first to expose the scandal.

    “Yes that is correct,” he wrote. “My report was the first to make a detailed investigation into Surgisphere. [The data company.] My report came out May 29.”

    6 days later, on June 4, the two most prominent medical journals in the world had both retracted the HCQ papers; Two ships hitting the same iceberg.

    It is very rare for a major medical journal to retract a paper, especially one that supports an entire orthodoxy. This paper pinned together the very trinity of Covid-19’s economic and political faith: By taking down HCQ, as “dangerous,” it took direct aim also at President Trump.

    Based on this research team’s data, in lockstep, the WHO halted global trials for Hydroxychloroquine, (HCQ.) Word went out through controlled global media that HCQ was ineffective and even deadly.

    Why? Because the researchers entrusted with collecting and interpreting the data concluded that HCQ a) did not work and b) was associated with increased deaths.

    The paper, numbingly titled: “Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine with or without a Macrolide for treatment of Covid-19: a multinational registry analysis” was published online on May 22, 2020, and it claimed to draw on cohorts of a staggering 96,000 patients (more than two packed Shea Stadiums) in 671 hospitals worldwide.

    The truth now emerging is that the data was never vetted, either by the authors of the paper or by the journals that published its conclusions.

    The Lancet retraction was requested by three of the study’s authors: Mandeep Mehra, Frank Ruschitzka, and Amit Patel, and read in part: “After publication of our Lancet Article, several concerns were raised with respect to the veracity of the data and analyses conducted by Surgisphere Corporation and its founder and our co-author, Sapan Desai.”

    Here is an interview with Desai: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVoYZXPUS7w

    The NEJM retraction was signed by all five authors, including Desai. It read:

    TO THE EDITOR:
    BECAUSE ALL THE AUTHORS WERE NOT GRANTED ACCESS TO THE RAW DATA AND THE RAW DATA COULD NOT BE MADE AVAILABLE TO A THIRD-PARTY AUDITOR, WE ARE UNABLE TO VALIDATE THE PRIMARY DATA SOURCES UNDERLYING OUR ARTICLE, “CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE, DRUG THERAPY, AND MORTALITY IN COVID-19.”1 WE THEREFORE REQUEST THAT THE ARTICLE BE RETRACTED. WE APOLOGIZE TO THE EDITORS AND TO READERS OF THE JOURNAL FOR THE DIFFICULTIES THAT THIS HAS CAUSED.
    Mandeep R. Mehra, M.D.
    Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Boston, MA
    mmehra@bwh.harvard.edu

    Sapan S. Desai, M.D., Ph.D.
    Surgisphere, Chicago, IL

    SreyRam Kuy, M.D., M.H.S.
    Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

    Timothy D. Henry, M.D.
    Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH

    Amit N. Patel, M.D.
    University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

    Incredibly, after The Lancet paper was published, after The WHO stopped all HCQ studies. “Independent peer reviewers” informed the paper’s authors that the private data collection company “Surgisphere,” owned by co-author –Sapan Desai–would not provide the full dataset for analysis. “As such,” they wrote, “our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review and therefore notified us of their withdrawal from the peer-review process.”

    That’s medical journal Latin for “We published despite having no idea if our data was real.”

    The Guardian Newspaper, in addition to Dr. Todaro, actually did excellent reporting leading to yesterday’s sudden retractions, after their investigation led to findings of potential data fraud. Surgisphere claimed to run “one of the largest and fastest hospital databases in the world,” (a global total of 1200 hospitals) but when The Guardian reached out to five hospitals in Australia, they said they had never heard of Surgisphere, never mind submitted patient data to them. One red flag was that Surgisphere was reporting that as of April 21 they said there had been 73 deaths in Australia from Covid-19, but there had only been 67, according to data from Johns Hopkins University. Desai, a vascular surgeon based in Chicago, had also been named in at least three malpractice lawsuits, had raised funds for a shady “human augmentation device” that never came to fruition; His company lists only 11 employees, one of whom, The Guardian points out, is an X rated model, another, a science fiction writer. And to make matters even more unsettling, Desai’s Wikipedia page has been deleted, and he is stonewalling investigators.

    The Guardian quoted Peter Ellis, a data scientist from Nous Group, which does data integration for governments. He said that the Surgisphere database was “…almost certainly a scam.” He said there was no evidence that Surgisphere had any analytical software “earlier than a year ago,” and that it would have taken possibly years to achieve data collection and hospital participation on the scale they claimed. The Lancet study was not only questioned by The Guardian, but also by 120 doctors, who penned a protest. Soon it emerged on Twitter that Surgisphere was placed in liquidation in 2015.

    One thing that troubles me is how the authors requested the retraction of their own article, from both Lancet and NEJM. Note how both journals stood back as impervious as hospital walls, or parents whose only task is to quietly witness their children’s shameful confession before them. The journals take no responsibility for the utter lack of vetting. Not a word. The authors of the fake study are wearing shame-caps and marched before the reader, while the journal editors stand back. Kind of like Buzzfeed with the “Russian dossier.”

    We are seeing the Emperor’s naked body. We are seeing that what stands between the world’s most prestigious medical journals and the world at large on matters of international life-and-death importance is essentially nothing. They ran with it because it was fashionable. It was the thing to think and say in the era of Covid V. Trump, Covid as the new Russiagate and Impeachment.

    But only in the US is the good news about HCQ held hostage by political fervor. It has gotten Covid-19 under control in many countries, including France, South Korea, India, and Turkey.

    Here are studies proving the safety and efficacy of HCQ that any honest journalist could have accessed online in seconds:

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1...N1aDjY/preview

    https://www.connexionfrance.com/Fren...-trial-results

    “How do you get so much data that quickly? It’s extremely difficult and time consuming to negotiate data sharing agreements with hospitals,” said Dr. Jonathan Fishbein, President of Veracuity, a bio-pharmaceutical safety, informatics and analytics firm based in PA. “That should have set off alarm bells. It would have been an issue to pursue before deciding to publish what seemed to be such a seminal paper.”

    “The whole HCQ thing has turned from being a medical thing to a political one. Anybody who is anti Trump will be anti HCQ,” he said in a phone interview. “The real tragedy here is that The WHO acted rapidly on Surgisphere’s findings. As a result, there may have been patients who should have received hydroxychlorquine but didn’t, and paid with their lives.”

    The conflicts of interest are also rather shocking.

    The research teams’s lead author, Dr. Mehra, is a director at Boston’s Bingham & Women’s Hospital, credited with funding the study. Both Mehra and The Lancet failed to disclose that the hospital has a “partnership” with Gilead, and is running trials of competing Covid-treatment, Remdesivir, “touted” by Anthony Fauci. Remdesivir costs $1,000 per pill, whereas HCQ’s generic price is $0.64.

    The day before The Lancet retracted the paper, The WHO announced it would resume trials of HCQ, suddenly discovering that it did not in fact increase the risk of death in patients. Little detail.

    How did this disaster come to pass? How did HCQ go from being a 65 year old malaria drug with no issues to being, by April of 2020, the new Trump attackology, in pill form? The media–that’s how. Medicine is now utterly weaponized in the all engulfing anti-Trump media-driven pogrom. It happened very fast:

    President Trump had come out at more than one press conference, singing the drug’s praises, and saying he himself was taking it. The media began its breast-beating right on cue: It was fish tank cleaner. It was deadly. Trump was killing people. Jimmy Kimmel said Trump was “trying to kill himself,” while Neil Cavuto flatly insisted: “This will kill you.”

    Chris Cuomo thundered that the “numbers are black and white, they don’t lie.” Numbers don’t lie, Mr. Cuomo, but research scientists do. And they did.

    As soon as Trump backed HCQ, in line with his consistent message that he would rather see a successful treatment than a vaccine, because a vaccine can “destroy a person,” absurd and cartoonish fear mongering around this time tested medication erupted through the mass media, designed to crush the hopes of the world, that HCQ could solve the problem, and we could re-open the world for business. They ignored a vast body of medical evidence going back over half a century proving the drug safe for human use, and years of studies proving it worked against SARS, and months of studies from several countries, proving it was effective both a prophylactic and yes, cure, for Covod-19, when used with zinc. The zinc is the thing–the HCQ opens the cellular pathway for the zinc to get into cells.

    “Zinc is the bullet. HCQ is the gun. Treat Covid-19 early and live. Reopen the world economy now,”

    Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, a strong advocate of HCQ who uses it successfully in his practice, wrote on Twitter.

    Quote Dr Vladimir (Zev) Zelenko
    @zev_dr
    Zinc is the bullet and hydroxychloroquine is the gun. @ZelenkoProtocol @realDonaldTrump @RudyGiuliani @MarkMeadows

    5,238
    8:03 PM - May 27, 2020
    Twitter Ads info and privacy
    2,815 people are talking about this
    The debate about HCQ’s safety has always been baseless and fake. It’s been used safely for 65 years, and the CDC’s website (CDC.gov) lists it as a medication that can safely be prescribed to “adults and children of all ages.”

    “CDC has no limits on the use of hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of malaria, ” the site states.

    The only risk the CDC website lists, apart from transient symptoms such as headache, nausea, and itching, is that if you take high doses over many years you have to get your eyes checked as it can lead to a rare eye condition called retinopathy.

    But despite the truth being out in the open for all to access, a psy-op of terror and recrimination formed around the drug, along with a “major study,” appearing way too quickly, that served to puncture not only the drug’s future as a Covid-treatment but also, re-write its entire history, safety profile, and branding. Voila.

    There it was–the ” large scale study” that proved that Trump was wrong, dangerous, and crazy, and that NIH head Anthony Fauci, was correct to dismiss it, (though he was on record advocating it as safe and effective against SARS.) Fauci was of course the good father, warning us all; Trump was the bad father, raising “false hope” about a “deadly drug.” Good father Fauci, was pushing Gilead’s anti-viral HIV drug Remdesivir, claiming it reduced recovery times for Covid-19 patients.


    Meanwhile, Remdesivir is both proven unsafe and proven unproven. From MedPage Today:

    “For Remdesivir, one review in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine cited concern about cardiac arrhythmias, but another in Cardiovascular Research called CV effects and toxicities unknown.”

    Another astonishing line from the same article cites Remdesivir’s use in an experimental Ebola study. You will have to read this sentence twice to believe it:

    “The only adverse events reported in that trial were deaths, and the only one adjudicated as possibly related to Remdesivir was one case of hypotension followed rapidly by cardiac arrest.”

    The side effects for the drug on its lengthy Wikipedia page are hardly reassuring:

    “The most common adverse effects in studies of remdesivir for COVID‑19 include respiratory failure and organ impairment, including low albumin, low potassium, low count of red blood cells, low count of platelets that help with clotting, and yellow discoloration of the skin.[12][unreliable medical source?]Other reported side effects include gastrointestinal distress, elevated transaminase levels in the blood (liver enzymes), and infusion site reactions.[3]

    Why does Anthony Fauci think Remdesivir is safer than HCQ? Why does he have a job at all, protecting “public health” when he thinks we should all be taking a drug that is associated with liver failure and heart attacks, as most anti-HIV drugs are? I’m glad Trump has not spoken to him in two weeks. Make it two months. I feel safer each day POTUS does not speak to Fauci.

    The truth of HCQ, ironically, were captured in the NYT Magazine’s cover story on famous French microbiologist Didier Raoult, which caught my eye when it was published a month ago. The “dek” which sums up the zeitgeist perfectly, reads: “He Was A Science Star. Then He Promoted A Questionable Cure For Covid-19: The man behind Trump’s favorite unproven treatment has made a great career assailing orthodoxy. His claim of a 100 percent cure rate shocked scientists around the world.”

    For the record, and as the article concedes, Raoult’s star has only brightened after his HCQ successes. His face is on coffee cups, in France. Raoult has won every major science award in France, is the most cited microbiologist in Europe, and the 7th most cited worldwide.

    From the NYT Magazine feature, by Scott Sayare:

    “Raoult, who founded and directs the research hospital known as the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, or IHU, has made a great career assailing orthodoxy, in both word and practice. “There’s nothing I like more than blowing up a theory that’s been so nicely established,” he once said. He has a reputation for bluster but also for a certain creativity. He looks where no one else cares to, with methods no one else is using, and finds things. In just the past 10 years, he has helped identify nearly 500 novel species of human-borne bacteria, about one-fifth of all those named and described. Until recently, he was perhaps best known as the discoverer of the first giant virus, a microbe that, in his opinion, suggests that viruses ought to be considered a fourth and separate domain of living things. The discovery helped win him the Grand Prix Inserm, one of France’s top scientific prizes. It also led him to believe that the tree of life suggested by Darwinian evolution is “entirely false,” he told me, and that Darwin himself “wrote nothing but inanities.” He detests consensus and comity; he believes that science, and life, ought to be a fight.

    It is in this spirit that, over the objections of his peers, and no doubt because of them, too, he has promoted a combination of Hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, and Azithromycin, a common antibiotic, as a remedy for Covid-19. He has taken to declaring, “We know how to cure the disease.” Trump was not the only one eager to embrace this possibility.”

    Twitter, last night, raged at The Lancet, NEJM, WHO and Fauci.

    Indy Jones tweeted: “Willful fraud…someone needs to be prosecuted for this.”

    Quote The Lancet

    @TheLancet
    · Jun 4, 2020
    Today, three of the authors have retracted "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis" Read the Retraction notice and statement from The Lancet https://hubs.ly/H0r7gh50



    Indy Jones
    @indy_jones3
    Willful Fraud... Someone needs to be prosecuted for this 🤬🤬


    389
    2:02 PM - Jun 4, 2020
    Twitter Ads info and privacy
    89 people are talking about this
    Mark F. McCarty wrote: “The people who have died, or will die, because of the idiotic and craven over-reaction of certain health authorities to this fraudulent report, likely consider the situation more than “an embarrassment or inconvenience.”

    He also tweeted:
    Quote Mark F. McCarty
    @markfmccarty
    · Jun 2, 2020
    #LancetGate Even if the Mehra paper were true, health authorities who used it to denounce HCQ have disgraced themselves. The study could not determine causation; the clinical significance of the arrhythmias was not established; the study was not pertinent to outpatient care.


    Mark F. McCarty
    @markfmccarty
    They must not be allowed to wriggle off the hook by claiming - "Oops, we were tricked!" Everyone who based regulatory decisions on this should be forced to resign.
    6:35 PM - Jun 2, 2020
    “You have lost all credibility. The Lancet is turning into political propaganda,” wrote Ben Golan.

    “This is a disgrace,” wrote Woman in Science. “The obscene power of Big Pharma…”

    “Mass Murder,” wrote Frente Civico.

    “RIP # The Lancet” wrote Cybertempus.

    “How long does it take,” wondered Stephen W. Shipman, “for people to understand that Fauci is a Deep State tool?”

    Quote Subhash Kak
    @subhash_kak
    Fauci changed policy on #HCQ based on an apparently fraudulent paper published in @TheLancet . That kind of bad judgment means that he should resign.#LancetGate https://twitter.com/swshipman/status...77789375614979

    Stephen W. Shipman
    @swshipman
    #FireFauci Fauci told @CNNnewsroom that this Lancet study provided him with the evidence to dismiss the efficacy of HCQ treatments. How long does it take for people to understand that Fauci is a Deep State tool? #Lancetgate https://twitter.com/JamesTodaroMD/st...73063405907969

    187
    9:39 AM - Jun 3, 2020
    Twitter Ads info and privacy
    99 people are talking about this
    Horton remained blithe and sarcastic in his tweets.

    “Resign,” one tweet said.

    “Sorry,” Horton tweeted. “The best editors get fired. I’m waiting.”

    “How much did The Lancet get paid to publish this paper in the first place?” asked Jeu Decisif.

    “Not enough, obviously,” Horton replied.

    Renato Lopes tweeted: “I feel ashamed to publish anything in The Lancet..Political agenda ahead of the science. Embarrassed.”
    Quote richard horton
    @richardhorton1
    · Jun 4, 2020
    It’s retracted. Here is a statement from three of the authors. https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status...13313702891523

    The Lancet

    @TheLancet
    Today, three of the authors have retracted "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis" Read the Retraction notice and statement from The Lancet https://hubs.ly/H0r7gh50Renato Lopes
    @renatopllopes
    I feel ashamed to publish anything in The Lancet and NEJM from now. The reputation and integrity of two magazines and their editors are in check. Politically biased and no qualified to peer review a study. Political agenda ahead of the science. Embarrassed.

    94
    3:44 PM - Jun 4, 2020
    Twitter Ads info and privacy
    23 people are talking about this
    “Ah, we’ll miss you,” Horton tweeted back.

    I asked Andrew Wakefield, famously persecuted after a 1998 paper he co-authored on the MMR vaccine was retracted from The Lancet, for comment.

    He texted:

    “Horton confuses honest science such as my 1998 Lancet paper with allegedly corrupt science such as that on Hydroxychloroquine.Both instances serve to advance the vaccine industry narrative.”

    By Friday morning, Horton was sounding more contrite. He tweeted:

    “All published papers using the Surgisphere database now need to be investigated as a matter of urgency. Based on our experience, no Surgisphere paper can be regarded as reliable until the primary data have been independently audited.”

    Quote richard horton
    @richardhorton1
    All published papers using the Surgisphere database now need to be investigated as a matter of urgency. Based on our experience, no Surgisphere paper can be regarded as reliable until the primary data have been independently audited. https://twitter.com/travishinson/sta...74466114695168

    Travis Hinson
    @TravisHinson
    Additional papers by all authors should be investigated for similar concerns as this may be a bigger problem than two studies. This lack of oversight could be plaguing other papers by Mehra et al. https://twitter.com/richardhorton1/s...68505777463296

    200
    6:59 AM - Jun 5, 2020
    Twitter Ads info and privacy
    93 people are talking about this
    Asked to place the scandal in context, Dr. Todaro told UnCoverDc:

    “This medical scandal directly embarrassed the world’s most prestigious medical institutions including Harvard, The Lancet and the World Health Organization as well as countless government officials, including Dr. Fauci, who all touted the study’s findings.”

    Meanwhile, how many have, as Dr. Fishbein said, “paid with their lives?” How many will, at the very least, pay with their jobs?



    Celia Farber is half Swedish, raised there, so she knows “socialism” from the inside. She has focused her writings on freedom and tyranny, with an early focus on the pharmaceutical industry and media abuses on human liberties. She is the recipient of the Semmelweis International Society Clean Hands Award For Investigative Journalism, and the author of “Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS”

    Twitter: @CeliaFarber
    Web: www.truthbarrier.com
    FB: Celia Ingrid Farber
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Billy (9th June 2020), Franny (10th June 2020), Harmony (9th June 2020), Sarah Rainsong (8th June 2020), Sunny (8th June 2020), wondering (9th June 2020)

  37. Link to Post #299
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    27th January 2017
    Posts
    18
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 155 times in 15 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    People with the coronavirus infection often have crackling sounds in their lungs. People with beriberi, a vitamin B1 (thiamine) deficiency, also have crackling sounds in their lungs. The cure for beriberi is thiamine supplementation. Also, pneumonia is a common complication of the coronavirus infection, and thiamine has been used to cure pneumonia.

    In a study measuring thiamine levels in red blood cells (erythrocytes), 250 mg/day of thiamine was given to two groups of patients, one group was given the thiamine orally, and the other by injection. Thiamine levels rose slower with oral administration than with injection, but after five days they were similar. In order to get thiamine levels quickly up to therapeutic levels with oral administration, thiamine could be given twice on the first day, then once a day thereafter. For acute infections, a reasonable dose schedule to quickly get thiamine up to therapeutic levels but not overdose, is 250 mg twice on the first day, then 250 mg/day for five days, then around 125 mg/day until the infection ends. By using 125 mg capsules (total from thiamine HCl and benfotiamine), this can be done by giving two 125 mg capsules twice a day, for a total of four, on the first day, then using two capsules once a day for five days, then one capsule a day until the infection ends.

    Oral thiamine should be taken with a meal, in which case it is relatively safe. Possible side effects of thiamine include nausea, diarrhea, stomach ache, or an allergic reaction.

    Thiamine is a great addition to a treatment plan, because it supports the lungs. Some patients who recover from the coronavirus have a loss of lung capacity. If those patients were given thiamine, they might have their full lung capacity today.

  38. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Rhydwyn For This Post:

    Agape (14th June 2020), Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Franny (10th June 2020), Gwin Ru (10th June 2020), Sarah Rainsong (15th June 2020), Sunny (9th June 2020)

  39. Link to Post #300
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,398 times in 4,672 posts

    Default Re: Covid-19 Treatment and Prevention

    COVID: Fake study, Fake drug, Fake land of loons

    by Jon Rappoport
    Jun10, 2020

    As many of you know, a major study on the drug, Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), has been retracted by the Lancet, a mere 13 days after it was published. That might be a world record.

    The study, using a gigantic data set of 96,000 patients in 671 hospitals, concluded the drug was useless for treating COVID-19 patients, and posed health dangers.

    The study (briefly) had the effect of convincing medical professionals, governments, media, and the public that HCQ was a total failure. A COVID drug would have to come from somewhere else.

    Only one problem:

    The authors of the study and the Lancet reviewers now confess the data can’t be found. The strong suggestion is, the data never existed.

    The relentless and brilliant journalist, Celia Farber, covers the whole sordid story at uncoverdc.com. She points out that “Remdesivir, [the toxic COVID drug] ‘touted’ by Anthony Fauci…costs $1,000 per pill, whereas HCQ’s generic price is $0.64.” That’s called a clue.

    And, of course, the plan is to keep the whole COVID farce going long enough to make the Bill Gates vaccine the primary instrument of treatment, through “prevention.”

    The next part of this article was prompted by a story a friend told me: a graduate student, when informed about the Lancet retraction, blew up and said, “Don’t you care about SCIENCE?” Scratching an inch below the surface of his non-sequitur outburst, his meaning was clear—he hates Trump, Trump said he was taking HCQ, so HCQ must be terrible, so the discredited Lancet study must actually be accurate. And that’s science. Isn’t this charming? And how many thousands of dollars did this student’s education cost?

    So let’s focus on one sector of the massive population of loons who are dutifully wearing masks and trudging down life’s path hypnotized by the COVID myth:

    College students.

    Several years ago, I posted a staggering statistic from the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI):
    “More than 25 percent of college students have been diagnosed or treated by a professional for a mental health condition within the past year.”
    Aside from the zombifying effects of the psychiatric drugs (made even more dangerous by any effort to quickly withdraw from them), the students gain a new perspective from the mental-disorder diagnosis: they’re victims. And now a COVID pandemic? They can wear their masks and deepen that self-image. Wonderful.

    Big Brother has given them a psychiatric diagnosis, meds, and an excuse for not succeeding in life. Big Brother has also given millions of them student loans. An illusion of a free ride.

    Victim mindset, free ride. Perfect.

    Throw off those COVID masks? Not a chance. That would suggest the possibility of independence. Goes against victimhood.

    Victims try and whine and moan but never really succeed. That lifestyle sounds interesting. Put it on. Have fun with it. Adjust attitudes. Become a “heroic victim.” Who knew there was such an option?

    Who is Big Brother? The college students hazily think about who is supplying them with the “free” psychiatric meds, who is issuing orders about the pandemic, and who is handing out their loans. Seems to be the government on all counts. OK, love Big Brother, love the government. Done.

    If these students are learning anything at all in college, what is it? Well, at the top of the list would be: “science is truth.” Simple, easy, graspable.

    In this “pandemic,” who is the main figure? Who is the one who SEEMS to be on the side of science, with no political ax to grind? Fauci.

    Well, good. Fauci represents the government, Big Brother. Love Fauci. Follow Fauci.
    Where are the students’ brothers and sisters in the cult of victims? Where are they to be found, whining and bitching and moaning? On Twitter. Good. Love Twitter. Quick, easy, no thinking necessary. Type three sentences, that’s work for the day. Whew. Relax.

    Watch YouTube videos. Let the images and the voiceover flow by.

    Creative vision, energy, ambition, logic? Empty words from a gone world.

    Besides, AI is taking over everything. An automatic system from Big Brother. No effort necessary.
    “Going outside for a few minutes now. Put on my mask. No problem. When I’m out on the street, all I do is look at my cell phone anyway. Just need to stay six feet apart. I can do that. Victim hero behind the mask.”
    The student vaguely remembers a moment last year when he was at the museum and stopped at a painting by Goya. It ripped his heart out. It sent torrents of energy up his spine. But…the memory passes. The meds kick in. That was life as it used to be.

    No more. Now it’s signs and signals of social justice and the cell phone and twitter and the drugs and the mask and the victimhood and the loans and Fauci and the pandemic, etc., etc.


    SOURCES:
    Note: the NAMI figure of 25%, which I found several years ago and cited above in this article, seems to have been scrubbed from search engines. NAMI is now pegging the figure at closer to 20%.

    Instead of accepting diagnoses of made-up mental disorders, parents seeking to understand their children’s anxieties at college ought to consider the following:
    “…National Center for Education Statistics [is] reporting that many 12th grade students in the United States are reading and writing at a fifth grade level. Many college students take transitional coursework to improve their literacy skills in their first year of college. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that about one third of first-year college students take transitional courses… At some post-secondary institutions [colleges], the percentage of first-year students who enroll in transitional classes is as high as 60%…”: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ972863.pdf


    Jon Rappoport
    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 10th June 2020 at 18:15.

  40. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Franny (10th June 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 37 FirstFirst 1 5 15 25 37 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts