The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[Chester]

Swedish Covid-19 chief Anders Tegnell: judge me in a year

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xh9wso6bEAc

[Ratszinger]

You take the total number dead for any reason on that chart and add them up. They've done this for you already but to be safe do it yourself don't trust them. The total number of deaths for all reasons is 1,801,150,000 and 6% of that number is the cases that died of COVID19 and only COVID19, people otherwise perfectly healthy with no underlying conditions contributing to the cause of death such as one of the other reasons for deaths in the other columns. The answer is 108,069 people that died of COVID19 all by it's self. The other deaths with other contributing factors bring the number up to the current 167,558.

[Chester]

Posted by Ratszinger (here)
You take the total number dead for any reason on that chart and add them up. They've done this for you already but to be safe do it yourself don't trust them. The total number of deaths for all reasons is 1,801,150,000 and 6% of that number is the cases that died of COVID19 and only COVID19, people otherwise perfectly healthy with no underlying conditions contributing to the cause of death such as one of the other reasons for deaths in the other columns. The answer is 108,069 people that died of COVID19 all by it's self. The other deaths with other contributing factors bring the number up to the current 167,558.

You seem to have difficulty in reading with clarity. The percentage was in context of US covid related deaths (at that time approximately 153,000). Anyways - the information is going viral despite the attempts by the Twitters of the world to censor it -

CDC accused of ‘quietly modifying’ COVID death stats

"Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups."

[norman]

I've been checking out what the "left" is talking about, in the run up to the election, I've found something that's a bit more than hard left spin.

During this "The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell - Biden v. Trump: General election officially underway" podcast, I heard someone tell the listeners that 1,000 people a day are dying of covid19 right now in Trump's America.

I don't believe it. Can that be true?


edit:

A more novel item is seeing how people can spin a neutral poll result.

When asked, 73% of Americans say they are not happy with the direction the country is going in. [I do wonder who thought of asking that question in that way]

The 'LEFT', spin that into 73% 'dissatisfaction with Trump'.

Hah!, I've just spent 4 years watching the 'left' doing everything possible to block Trump from fixing the direction the country is going in.

That's my dip down into election politics done.

[Ratszinger]

[/COLOR]

Posted by Chester (here)

Posted by Ratszinger (here)
You take the total number dead for any reason on that chart and add them up. They've done this for you already but to be safe do it yourself don't trust them. The total number of deaths for all reasons is 1,801,150,000 and 6% of that number is the cases that died of COVID19 and only COVID19, people otherwise perfectly healthy with no underlying conditions contributing to the cause of death such as one of the other reasons for deaths in the other columns. The answer is 108,069 people that died of COVID19 all by it's self. The other deaths with other contributing factors bring the number up to the current 167,558.

You seem to have difficulty in reading with clarity. The percentage was in context of US covid related deaths (at that time approximately 153,000). Anyways - the information is going viral despite the attempts by the Twitters of the world to censor it -

CDC accused of ‘quietly modifying’ COVID death stats

"Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of deaths with each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups."

That is all deaths in the USA I wasn't counting the world. I was only looking at all deaths in the USA and the percentages are from those numbers. You're the one exaggerating numbers to lower them. The count of the dead due to COVID19 and only COVID19 is the number I gave for the people in the USA that died by COVID19 and only that and nothing else. These were people otherwise healthy with no underlying conditions just as stated. You seem to want to fudge the numbers to favor an agenda. I just want to be truthful.


You go to the link I provided earlier and the new updated numbers for today are there here at 4am with USA death count total for the entire count of all being 1,818,702 that have died in the USA!

6% of that number that total is what they are talkin about! All deaths no matter the cause. That number today is 109,122 that died of COVID19 all by itself with nothing else contributing to their death but the novel virus.

[mountain_jim]

Wanted to share this Gab post by C.E.O. of BASED that I resonated with...

https://gab.com/Keepinitlive/posts/104788097155084552

I'm starting to hate the term "redpilled". The definition of that should be calculated by how long you have rejected MSM and had a thirst for "alternative" sources. If that is just a few months, sorry got bad news for ya, you aren't "redpilled". You are however on the correct path/pattern of behavior. The reason I hate this term is that it puts a cheap label on what it means to truly break free from the "matrix" (another allegory I HATE). The questions you should ask yourself is why? What lead you to this line of thinking?

I hate making posts personal, but I am 30 years old. I read "behold a pale Horse" by Bill Cooper(HERO) in 9th grade because of a cool cousin that gave me a copy(deceased {cuz&cooper}). I remember telling my high school frens in (around) 2007 about the "loose change" documentary and the "Zeitgeist" movie. When I was like 16-17. I am not stating this to brag or impugn others creds. My point being is that if Q is your first and only redpill then I would recommend NOT taking the whole bottle at once. The reason the Q movement grew so much in the early days was because of oldfags like me that have been taking slow micro-doses of redpills for YEARS, MANY much longer than me.

It is definitely an eye opener to be exposed to "alternative" info , to develop a different worldview than your peers. I would even classify it as exciting sometimes(depressing most others). It is however EXTREMELY important to READ Q DROPS(in my everlasting search for truth, Q is the only true VERIFIABLE intel my civ ass will ever get) beginning to end, at least once a month. The reason I say this is that I have "red-pilled" plenty of normie frens irl, and they always fall for **** like Steinbart,5G ,Flat Earth etc. etc, and that is because they NEVER READ Q. They just gravitate to whatever (insert here) thing on the internet that can "explain" it to them (no different from MSM).

Although they may have "taken the red-pill" ,that just basically means you looked something up for once. However when that barrier to question the info you are disseminating breaks, the tendency for you to absorb all info in front of you as truth HAS NOT.

Being red-pilled is great, it takes time tho. Being based should be your long-term goal imo. I consider myself based because of the length of time I have been looking into things that I deem important, and any issue or "conspiracy" that I have researched I have done so with a COMPLETE open mind, and hours/months if not years of study. If you ask me where I stand on something I will either politely say "I have not done enough research/open minded to it- let me get back with you, OR I know enough of what I am talking about to DIE ON ANY HILL I STAND ON. Be "red-pilled" AND BASED. The world depends on your due diligence. I hope this makes sense, had a few bourbons.

LOVE to ALL in this movement!

[mountain_jim]

In last 3 days:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/child-...io-us-marshals

US Marshals rescue 25 missing children from Ohio; many are victims of human trafficking or prostitution

In a separate undercover sting operation, 27 men were arrested after allegedly attempting to engage in sexual activity with minors

U.S. Marshals located 25 missing and endangered children from Ohio in the past 20 days of an ongoing operation. U.S. Marshals worked with state and local agencies in Ohio to track down missing children in Operation Safety Net.

The missing children, who were between the ages of 13 and 18, were found in Cleveland, East Cleveland, Euclid, Willoughby, and as far away as Miami, Florida. U.S. Marshals noted that a quarter of the endangered children were victims of human trafficking and prostitution.

"These are kids that have been abused, neglected. Some involved in human trafficking," U.S. Marshal Pete Elliott told WOIO-TV.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-mars...cid=uxbndlbing

U.S. Marshals say they found 39 missing children in Georgia during two-week operation

The U.S. Marshals Service found 39 missing children in Georgia over two weeks in a mission known as "Operation Not Forgotten," the agency announced in a press release Thursday. The operation led to the rescue of 26 children and the safe location of 13 others.


"These missing children were considered to be some of the most at-risk and challenging recovery cases in the area, based on indications of high-risk factors such as victimization of child sex trafficking, child exploitation, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and medical or mental health conditions," the press release reads.

"Other children were located at the request of law enforcement to ensure their wellbeing," the release continues. "USMS investigators were able to confirm each child's location in person and assure their safety and welfare."

[mountain_jim]

Thread on many of George Soros funding operations

https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1300650506952605697

https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1...747519495?s=20

https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1...454944769?s=20

interesting thread on what may be happening behind the scenes to legally go after Antifa:

https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1300592826170908675



https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1...231973376?s=20

[Gemma13]

Thomas Paine points out the low Covid 6% CDC stats in this tweet linked in Sammy's post.

Posted by Chester (here)
We've been played (but most on this forum know this)

https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/...rgency-sham%2F

and...

The Fauci Files

Story at-a-glance

Dr. Anthony Fauci has served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, but has yet to come out with the “Big One” — a vaccine or infectious disease treatment that will allow him to retire with a victory under his belt

Fauci has flip-flopped on the use of masks, first mocking people for wearing them, and then insisting they should. In mid-July, he suddenly urged governments to “be as forceful as possible” on mask rules

While Fauci still claims there’s only anecdotal evidence supporting the use of hydroxychloroquine, and that the drug doesn’t work for COVID-19, the scientific support for it goes as far back as 2005

In April, Fauci praised the NIAID-sponsored drug Remdesivir, saying it "has a clear-cut and significant positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery." Overall, the improvement rate for the drug was 31%

Research now shows hydroxychloroquine reduced mortality by 50% when given early, and many doctors anecdotally claim survival rates close to 100%. Despite such excellent results, Fauci continues to disparage and cast doubt on hydroxychloroquine

[Gracy]

https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/1...231973376?s=20

Hey you guys, serious questions here: If I'm not mistaken, DHS has the power to do warrantless searches because of the Patriot Act, which used to be considered a dangerous precedent. Along with it's red headed stepchild the National Defense Authorization Act which could lock these "terrorists" away indefinitely for life without trial, same as any one of us who could be labeled "terrorist", or "dangerous to national security" like Julian Assange.

So, are warrantless searches supposed to be a good thing now? I've always rather liked what's left of the 4TH Amendment.

And why is DHS deemed trustworthy now? They were born of false flag 9/11, of which this same federal government was blaming Saddam Hussein and it's own creation Al Qaida for. Were they already around then they would be screaming a terrorist is behind every tree as well.

Kind of like they are now.

So what gives? How did they morph into trusted knights in shining armor?

I remember just a few short years ago when people were freaking out because DHS was buying up billions of bullets, and guns were flying off the shelves in case they were needed to defend against them.

My how times have changed.

[norman]

Posted by Gracy May (here)


My how times have changed.

They never thought she'd lose.

[mountain_jim]

Good points Gracy May.

But you always seem to impute our support for these things posted about here, and I do support bringing violent anarchist law-breakers to justice, but I have not supported any of the loss of our rights since the Patriot Act.

For me this has all been about awakening the sleeping/mind-controlled - for hopefully better governance in the future, if indeed we still have a country left by then.

The USA has basically been overthrown and run in the background by CIA-Operation-Paperclip-Nazis since the 1947 National Security Act (well plus Rothschild /Rockefeller banksters and pharma) - waking folks up to all of that is our only hope, if it's not too late.

I am reporting what's going on, not saying it's a great thing - I started to put 'legally' in quotes when I posted.

And long ago in a response to autumnw, I indicated if Q-team was military the possibility of military extra-legal actions was a valid concern.

Another concern: it appeared to me that the Q-team always seemed to be on the side of the NSA and ok with the fact that access to all US citizen communications via FISA had been granted and in use (and abuse).

Like just now in Australia arresting a women for posting on Facebook to protest government overreach, our freedoms have rapidly disappeared.

On the other hand, if Soros-funded organizations and individuals are burning federal property and terrorizing citizens with an intent to overthrow the elected government, I hope US Law enforcement has legal means to go after those breaking the laws and those funding them.

And if the Dem politicians keep encouraging this behavior and bailing out these violent anarchists, and the MSM keeps providing cover, I want folks to be aware of that also.

Interesting times.

[Gracy]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
Good points Gracy May.

But you always seem to impute our support for these things posted about here, and I do support bringing violent anarchist law-breakers to justice, but I have not supported any of the loss of our rights since the Patriot Act.

Okay thanks Jim. I faithfully read everything posted here, and usually when y'all post tweets like that it's in support of, unless directly pointed out as being some mainstream media drivel or something.

Something I notice overall, is that folks across the political spectrum tend to be in support of these big behemoth branches of government when "their guy" is at the helm, and then back to expressing concern for them when the other side's guy is at the helm, so I had to check and see what was up with that.

Like I've got a very close relative who bleeds blue for the democrat party, no matter what, they're always the good guys. When Bush invaded Irag it was a war crime, but when Obama ruined Libya the tune changed to "well, sometimes we have to do things like that to uphold our national security".



In another instance they were all for the new, broad reaching powers the NDAA gave Obama to combat terrorism, but expressed grave concern over what the next guy might do with them.

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
The USA has basically been overthrown and run in the background by CIA-Operation-Paperclip-Nazis since the 1947 National Security Act (well plus Rothschild /Rockefeller banksters and pharma) - waking folks up to all of that is our only hope, if it's not too late.

You don't think it goes any further back than that?

I don't exactly think the white hats were at the helm for instance, when "we" were stealing land from places like the Sandwich Islands and Mexico, or committing genocide against the Indians.

I do agree that WW2 and just after was the big empire handover from Great Britain, to the US.

[mountain_jim]

Well the illuminati/masonic involvement goes back to the forming.

The banker cabal regained control at Jekyll Island in 1910 with the Federal Reserve undercover operation.

The Military Industrial / Intelligence complex asserted their broad powers in 1947.

I would not ascribe white-hattery to much of any USA history - but it's still where I live and hope to improve things rather than watch/experience anarchical destruction happen.

back to the original topic, first Q post in a week

4628
Link to New Q Drop
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
2 Sep 2020 - 11:33:22 AM
https://www.fbi.gov/services/informa...ments/sentinel
Files do not go 'missing' unless 7th floor direct involvement.
Follow the logs.
Q

Privacy Impact Assessment for the SENTINEL System

...
Accuracy of Information

Operational information will be verified or checked as part of the normal procedures associated with day-to-day tasks of the FBI Special Agents, Intelligence Analysts and other SENTINEL users. The procedures associated with criminal investigations, national security intelligence production, and scientific support performed by the FBI, which include multiple levels of oversight and review both internally and externally to the Bureau, ensure that information is checked for accuracy. SENTINEL’s workflow design will aid the review process. In addition, it is standard practice in law enforcement and intelligence analysis to corroborate and verify the accuracy of personal information from as many sources as are available before acting upon it—and that practice will be followed in the SENTINEL case management system as well. This practice is driven not only by the desire to protect the privacy of persons whose information is in SENTINEL, but also by the imperative to ensure that resources are properly used and focused where they will do the most good.

Disposition

Information from SENTINEL is subject to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Information entered into SENTINEL is kept according to the appropriate record schedule for that individual record. The record schedule depends on and is determined by the type of data or the case classification. For example, a case in SENTINEL could be a Public Corruption case, Counterterrorism, or a Terrorism case. FBI’s Records Management Division (RMD) follows processes and procedures for disposition schedules depending on the type of record maintained within SENTINEL.

...

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/sta...895708161?s=20

[Gemma13]

GracyMay I personally don't always align with what I/is posted. I think it's valuable to look at both sides of anything and appreciate when members contribute multiple angles as I don't automatically default to "member must be in agreement with what they post". I imagine a lot do though.

[Ernie Nemeth]

I agree that power lies within the reaches of the military industrial complex, as Eisenhower warned us of way back when. It is not ever about the Dems or Rebs. That is just entertainment for the masses. So they feel like they have a measure of control over their lives.

There is a divide between reds and blues. One or the other take hold of the reigns of power. But the real control are those who are always there, that do not need an election to gain power or influence, whose job is to wield the power of the USA in the name of the newest head of state. Those people and their masters do not come and go and we the people have no say in who they are or what their policies might be.

If anarchy is represented as violent disregard for law and order, is sovereignty its opposite? How would you describe sovereignty?

[mountain_jim]

“Government is the Entertainment division of the military-industrial complex.”

― Frank Zappa

[norman]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)


How would you describe sovereignty?

I don't think this is entirely out of place here.

Sovereignty (personal) has to be subtle, under played and especially respectful, to work. Otherwise, if it's confrontational or aggressive, it's anarchy itself, at it's worst.

The key really is respect. It counters so many of the issues that get thrown up, for example, in identity politics. If two people, however different, can look each other in the eyes with real mutual respect, all the other issues fall away to irrelevance.

If those two people cannot, for any reason do that ( yet ), they need space away from each other, not a political regime that forces them into a neutered mutuality.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Gracy May (here)
Something I notice overall, is that folks across the political spectrum tend to be in support of these big behemoth branches of government when "their guy" is at the helm, and then back to expressing concern for them when the other side's guy is at the helm, so I had to check and see what was up with that.

I definitely hear you, Gracy. Taking or adopting 'sides' based on red or blue is a huge misstep. I've always believed that. When viewed through that single lens all you will ever see is a parallax view of things. I don't take any sides. Personally, I disliked, distrusted, and disproved of every PM from Thatcher to present, whether red or blue. Boot-licking, motherf'ing royal sycophants all of them. War-mongering, hypocritical, special-interests protecting, big-bank-protecting, paedophile-protecting, frauds.

I could rant forever about our so-called 'political' system. On the US side, I feel exactly the same of Bush, Clinton, Bush2, and Obama. Dirty, lying, war-mongering frauds. Carter was a puppet. Ford was swamp. Nixon was swamp. Johnson was gangster swamp. But JFK was a hero, and Reagan I had a lot of time for. For me, parties and allegiances play second fiddle to character and integrity. That I strongly contend is the MOST important ingredient for high office (and it's why most who have integrity and character don't get to hold high office). It's almost like you have to be a slime ball to sit in the big chair. So few appear to get that or share that opinion. If I thought Hillary was a person of high integrity, of firm moral fibre, she would've had my vote. But she wasn't, and none of them were.

For many, many reasons, evidences, arguments, and examples displayed throughout this thread and multiple others, I have reached the opinion (and did 4 years ago), the very firm opinion - that Trump is a person of actual integrity. Obviously no saint, who is!, but a man of very different stripe to those who preceded him. We know he's not a career politician, that's in his favour immediately, but is he a puppet?

I don't think so. With the abuse and resistance he has received from the political establishment and the media establishment, all that phony Russia collusion bs they attempted to frame him with (and failed), I don't think so. I feel the push back against the deep state is real. I believe what Trump portrays himself to be, and what he has promised to do, is real. He intends to drain the swamp. And I believe he's doing his best, in the face of monumental interference and obstruction. I believe he is trying to save the country - and by extension, the western world. Not from invasion but infiltration. I do see that. Clear as day. And I trust the Q intel, and him. So that's where I'm at.

I've been called a crackpot for beliefs more fringe than this, so I'm not worried.

[mountain_jim]

6 more Q drops since the first one today - 4 of which outline the politician misconduct that was included from other sources earlier in this thread. (Don't know if identical or more or less covered)

https://qmap.pub/

and I somehow missed the fact that Q's first post today corresponds to the Front Page of today's USA Today - a paper I would always read when I was travelling on business and it was delivered to the room.

https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status...610261505?s=20

4629
Link to New Q Drop
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
2 Sep 2020 - 11:46:30 AM

< USA Today image >

CORRUPT.
CONTROLLED.
ENEMIES OF THE REPUBLIC.
Q

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...cid=uxbndlbing

QAnon is radicalizing Americans
Ashley Shaffer
USA TODAY

A far-right conspiracy movement is spreading through America. Coronavirus cases in the U.S. are higher than anywhere in the world. And in another episode of time appearing to be meaningless, it's almost September.

It's Ashley with Monday's news to know. Let's do it.

The QAnon conspiracy theory has gone mainstream

Been hearing about the far-right conspiracy theory QAnon lately? Me, too. So I asked my colleague, Nathan Bomey, to explain it to me. Here's what he had to say:

Before the internet, it was hard to share conspiracy theories. Now, however, it's really simple. And Americans are increasingly diving deep — so deep that it's getting dangerous. A growing number of people are falling prey to a patchwork of conspiracy theories called QAnon. The group circulates a wide range of conspiracy theories, but its main premise is the baseless assertion that President Donald Trump is protecting the world from a network of "evil" Democrats who are secretly leading a child-sex trafficking ring. The far-right movement is increasingly spreading their conspiracies on mainstream social media channels. Feeling the suffocating grip of social isolation and economic challenges amid COVID-19, many Americans are desperately searching for a sense of community — and they're finding it in QAnon.

But this isn't harmless clickbait: Extremism experts say they're concerned about signs that the "digital cult" is translating into real-world violence. In April, an Illinois woman who had immersed herself in QAnon theories was arrested in New York after traveling there with a stash of knives and weapons and threatening Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.

What is QAnon and where did it come from? What to know about the far-right conspiracy theory:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ry/5486724002/