The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[RunningDeer]

4876-4880 - https://qalerts.app

4876
Oct 15, 2020 5:32:42 PM EDT

https://twitter.com/WashTimes/status...82387079131144
Q



4877
Oct 15, 2020 5:33:19 PM EDT





4878
Oct 15, 2020 5:54:41 PM EDT


>>11090593
twitter_over_capacity.jpg
Q YOU BROKE TWAT!
No, Anon. You did, collectively.
Q



4879
Oct 15, 2020 5:56:51 PM EDT

https://twitter.com/ChanelRion/statu...37387943395328

Just saw for myself a behind the scenes look at the #HunterBiden hard drive:
Drugs, underage obsessions, power deals...
Druggie Hunter makes Anthony Weiner's down under selfie addiction look normal.
#BidenCrimeFamily has a lot of apologizing to do.
So does Big Tech.
@OANN

>>11090775
"Underage obsessions" is a gentle way of putting it.
Remember, it's just a conspiracy.
That's why they are throwing everything they can at it.
Q


4880
Oct 15, 2020 6:22:02 PM EDT

Without you, collectively, there would have been no way to bypass their control.
They weren't about to repeat the mistake(s) of 2016.
You are what matters most.
UNITED NOT DIVIDED.
You awake, thinking for yourself, is their greatest fear.
WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q

[Sue (Ayt)]

Just caught this report on NBC news. Did a search, and it is appearing on yahoo.news and today.com.
Seems the msm is putting out some heavy damage control.
(but it may just backfire on them)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rCHV-_91IOU

[RunningDeer]

Yipes! They posted 29 Q drops in 24 hours.
Will add the Q drops link instead.

The Screaming Sheep (6 seconds)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SIaFtAKnqBU

♡

[RunningDeer]

The Five' react to the 'media meltdown' over Trump's NBC town hall

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9xS3x-84Ykw

Count down is on…

Watch Live: President Trump Town

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y5yUnUxpr_g

[PurpleLama]

Bernard Grover (Radio Far Side), Joseph P Farrell, and Catherine Austin Fitts had an anti-Q pow wow. Now, you guys all know I do not fall on the anti-Q side of the line any more than I am a "true believer", and as such I almost always find the examination of various perspectives to be a fruitful endeavor. These 3 voices are ones we can all appreciate, and as such are worthy of our attention, even if they disagree with the prevalent mood of the thread.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=O1iPBi7BMOU

Skip to 9 minutes to miss technical difficulties and introductions.

[PurpleLama]

We need to know what went down with cicada 3301 and the Global Engagement Center.

The video starts getting good in the second half.

[norman]

Posted by PurpleLama (here)
Bernard Grover (Radio Far Side), Joseph P Farrell, and Catherine Austin Fitts

I ain't addicted to Q.

I'm addicted to sentient love.

I ain't EVER going cold turkey on that. Nothing can replace it in this world, I'll revue the prospect a few worlds later, maybe.

[edina]

This is kinda funny, I never got into cicada because I'm not into puzzles.

I disagree with people who think Q is about puzzles. I have about zero patience with puzzles and I've never found the Q posts puzzling.

What most people call "cryptic" is simply short codes (aka acronyms). I've done a lot of different things in my life and every area naturally develops it's own short cuts in language. NWO, LOL, NSA, RR for Rod Rosenstein. That is not cryptic.

Stringers could be, but I felt that was for operators in the field.

There are now very overt attempts to suppress information. People are waking up. People are seeing this more and more clearly everyday.

It's happening globally for many reasons.

The information shared in the Q posts can be included in those reasons.

[mountain_jim]

From Neon reporting on chan activity - commenters there are split on whether this is a LARPer because why would Chanel risk her career and reputation putting her name out like this?

But this info presentation shows the kind of rumors and dot-connecting that is being discussed around the social media universe - well at least the uncensored areas.

Also reminds me of the BDAnon-style of narrative weaving.

Know soon enough.

From recent Notables: Possibly Chanel Rion posting on /pol/

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/282803452

https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/282848722

on another note

Twitter and Facebook's veto power over any issue - as long as it wasn't used too openly - gave each company tremendous political power.

But it was power that could only really be used once. As soon as either company was willing to openly take sides, they would lose the title of the world's public square, and hand over a huge amount of legitimacy to free speech oriented challengers.

What amazes me most is that this asset of theirs - which apart from Google no other company on Earth possesses - was squandered over something as trivial as Hunter Biden's e-mail.

[mountain_jim]

https://www.revolver.news/2020/10/hu...nthony-weiner/

Could There Be Something Darker and More Sinister Lurking on Hunter Biden’s Hard Drive?

by Moxie Russo

Nobody knows exactly where Hunter Biden is at the moment, but we all know where his laptop is … It’s at The New York Post. And thanks to a couple bombshell reports from The Post, we’re starting to get an idea of the gold mine that’s sitting on his hard drive.

In a nutshell, we’ve learned that Hunter Biden made a lot of money selling “VP access” to business folks in Ukraine and China.

The money Hunter raked in from his pay-to-play scam afforded him a wild and degenerate lifestyle, complete with hookers, strippers, and all the crack his little lungs could handle.

However, like most junkies, Hunter got sloppy, and when he took his laptop in for repair, it set into motion a string of events that would eventually lead to the opening of a Pandora’s Box straight from the bowels of ‘October Surprise’ hell.

The chain of events that led to the opening of Hunter’s Pandora’s Box is murky, but from we can piece together, the computer repair guy who was fixing Hunter’s laptop stumbled across something so alarming that he contacted the FBI, who, in turn, confiscated the laptop.

Prior to the FBI taking possession of the laptop, the computer repair guy made a copy of the hard drive. Now, for all we know, this could have been done as part of the repair process – but either way, a copy was made.

A year or so passed and the computer repair guy hadn’t heard anything back from the FBI so he reportedly reached out to Senator Mike Lee’s office. Unfortunately, he didn’t hear back from him either. At some point along the way, the computer repair guy was put in touch with Rudy Giuliani, who did respond back, and probably realized he just hit the political jackpot.

Rudy has told us that what we’re seeing now is just the “tip of the iceberg,” and he promises a lot more bombshells to come over the next several days.

I’m definitely looking forward to the upcoming political show — however — I’m already convinced that there’s a dark and seedy bombshell sitting right in front of our faces that’s going largely unnoticed.

I did a bit of digging around because I was curious about how this laptop dropped into Rudy’s hands, and in my research, I stumbled upon an article in “Business Insider” that held a very interesting nugget of information.

The article is titled, “The New York Post inadvertently revealed the original source of its dubious Hunter Biden story.” That immediately caught my eye, so I delved into the piece and towards the end of the article I spotted my little “bombshell.”

The Business Insider piece was seeking the same thing I was: dirt on how this whole thing went down. Their people examined many of the documents that were recovered off the hard drive and published in The New York Post piece, and they believe that based on those examinations they’ve identified the FBI agent who issued the subpoena for Hunter’s laptop.

His name is reportedly Joshua Wilson and he works out of the FBI’s satellite office in downtown Willmington. Mr. Wilson is an FBI agent best known for his work in the “child pornography” division of the bureau.

Do you see where I’m going with this?

Here’s a blip from the Business Insider article:

This analysis also suggests the subpoena was served by an FBI agent based out of the bureau’s satellite office in downtown Wilmington. The name of the agent, though not 100% legible, appears to be “Joshua Wilson.” Over the past decade, a number of news outlets have quoted or described an FBI agent with the same name.

Last year, The Star-Ledger newspaper described him as “an FBI agent based in New Jersey who has spent nearly five years working full time on child pornography.” In 2012, the same Joshua Wilson signed a criminal complaint that charged a New Jersey man with collecting and distributing child pornography. The signature on that complaint clearly matches the unreversed signature on the subpoena published by the New York Post.

It’s unclear whether the FBI employs more than one agent named Joshua Wilson. But the available evidence seems to show the Joshua Wilson who signed the subpoena for Hunter Biden’s laptop and the Joshua Wilson who investigates child pornography for the FBI are the same person. This raises the possibility, not explored by the Post, that the FBI issued the subpoena for reasons unrelated to Hunter Biden’s role in Ukraine and Burisma.

So, this raises the very obvious question: Did the computer repair guy stumble upon child pornography on Hunter’s laptop and contact the FBI as a result?

Did he keep a copy of the hard drive as the only remaining evidence of Hunter’s crimes in case the Veeps kid got off scot-free?

Honestly, it doesn’t sound all that Q-ish, does it?

But there’s a bit more I want to share with you.

After I read that article, I was perusing the internet once more and I happened upon another interesting nugget that might just back up this theory.

It came by way of OANN reporter Chanel Rion, who sent out a tweet after seeing the actual contents of Hunter’s laptop for herself.

Here’s what she said: “Just saw for myself a behind the scenes look at the #HunterBiden hard drive: Drugs, underage obsessions, power deals… Druggie Hunter makes Anthony Weiner’s down under selfie addiction look normal. #BidenCrimeFamily has a lot of apologizing to do. So does Big Tech.”

https://twitter.com/ChanelRion/statu...943395328?s=20

Drugs, underage obsessions, power deals…”

“Underage obsessions” is the phrase that jumped out at me. It sounds to me like Chanel is possibly talking about someone having a sexual fetish for minors.

I think that’s a reasonable assumption and it could be another key piece to this very disturbing puzzle.

Hopefully, over the next coming days, more will become clear and we’ll start to see the entire picture of Hunter and Joe’s scandals and crimes emerge.

But as it stands now, it looks like Hunter Biden could be the next “Anthony Weiner” on steroids.

[edina]

This helps explain the bonkers, over-the top, Q is a Cult, crazy Q, hit pieces happening across all types of media the past few days.

If what Chanel describes happens, then media assets will likely be deployed to claim it's all a Q Cult craziness, ... nothing to see here folks, and let's round up the Q people in the process. (Because face it, free thinkers are Divergents, and they're not staying on their media reservations, MSM and Alternative MSM. )

[edina]

I just checked IPOT's youtube channel and it's been "terminated" YouTube's word.

I haven't looked at his channel for a several days, so I don't know how long it's been down.

Note Added: Looks like he is still on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/IPOT1776/status/1316922156786307072

First link to his most recent Twitter thread where he talks about how to stay connected and his plans.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by edina (here)
I just checked IPOT's youtube channel and it's been "terminated" YouTube's word.
First link to his most recent Twitter thread where he talks about how to stay connected and his plans.

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Info mainstream media won’t cover.

• X22 Report - 950,000 subscribers; also @ BitChute
  
• In Pursuit of Truth (IPOT) - 241,000 subscribers; also @ BitChute
  
• And We Know - 383,000 subscribers; also @ BitChute
  
• prayingmedic - 391,000 subscribers; also prayingmedic.com

All four are down. Patrick's (IPOT) last video was October 12th, hours before he posted it, I checked on October 12th to update his subscription count. That video was the last one he uploaded there and on Bitchute.

This comes up for X22report, prayingmedic and And We Know.

[edina]

Amazing Polly's YouTube Channel has been "terminated", too.

This looks to be another YT purge.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by edina (here)
Amazing Polly's YouTube Channel has been "terminated", too.

This looks to be another YT purge.

Six more were either terminated or had the image like the one above: Dollar Vigilante, Charles Ward, High Impact Vlogs, aplanetruth 4u, George Webb, Max Igan (he was terminated a few weeks ago).

mgray’s website, Gray’s Economy is kickin' it.

Hunter Biden questions never showed up at town halls

[edina]

Here's a link to a comment from CodeMonkey (Ron) down in the comments of IPOT's Twitter thread.

https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/stat...13630294777856

Which reminds me of the article I read recently regarding Clarence Thomas

This had been trending on Twitter yesterday, or the day before...

Clarence Thomas Suggests Section 230 Immunities Applied Too Broadly to Tech Companies

Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas suggested in a statement on Tuesday that some legal immunities granted to internet platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act could be narrowed or eliminated in future court cases.

Section 230 grants internet platforms immunity from prosecution if a third party uploads defamatory or otherwise illegal content. For example, a blog website currently cannot be held legally liable if a third-party blogger writes a libelous post. (Such immunity does not generally apply in more extreme cases of illegal activity, such as when a website displays child pornography.)

However, both conservatives and liberals have threatened to revoke this immunity and open large internet platforms like Facebook and Twitter to lawsuits. Joe Biden stated in a New York Times interview in January 2020 that Facebook should lose Section 230 immunity because of the prevalence of political “misinformation” on the platform.

Some conservatives have bristled at what they perceive as anti-conservative bias on sites including Twitter, and have called to revoke Section 230 and threaten those sites with lawsuits over the perceived bias, which they claim reflects editorial decision making that makes the platforms no different from journalistic outlets.

[edina]

And this:

https://twitter.com/AjitPaiFCC/statu...08733805236226

[TargeT]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
"The term preference as used to refer to sexual orientation is widely considered offensive," the site states, "in its implied suggestion that a person can choose who they are sexually or romantically attracted to.”

I always thought "preference" meant it was your "1st choice" or in some instances your "majority" or "only" choice... ie: I prefer not to be in pain. (I do not personally consider that a choice, but I know there are people that do enjoy pain)

I feel completely comfortable saying "I prefer women as sexual partners"... Though I suppose to play devils advocate there could be an argument made that preference is gained largely from social influence, and thus can be "shifted" by influence (out side or inside).

For example: I prefer to not eat eggs, I have absolutely no reason behind it (though I can recall the situations in childhood that, when mixed with my personality, lead to this outcome)


Now the above thinking from webster (or lets be honest, the current "left presenting" control structure) infers that we have no control and are forced into sexual orientation, which I am not so sure is the case. It also is framed in a victimized mentality "I am a victim of my sexual orientation, you should feel bad for me and be careful with how you express ideas that refer to whom I choose to get naked with"....


How often do individuals change sexual preference, is it set in stone? There's a very common joke in US society about "experimenting in college" (though it's generally reserved for females) but doesn't that sort of show that sexual partners are a choice, or can be? Another example of this is that most people have a "type" of the specific gender they are attracted to, a young women I know on St Croix was very attracted to large "farm boy" men, but apparently also very classically feminine women (those are two very specific sub categories of gender) and I never saw her with anyone else; does that now deserve classification and special treatment as well? What are we getting our selves into with this ridiculous thinking pattern??

Anyway, the real issue is that this type of move just "feels dirty" it's intent is dark and negative and it seems bleedingly obvious to me...... but if I have such a strong reaction is it meant to be like that, was that the intent of this move (it seems so sloppy and obvious)?


Again I'm left with questions....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PhHIvIdOHLw

[RunningDeer]

Partial list of channels terminated:

https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/sta...92838236102661

President Trump says, “I know nothing about QAnon.”

In PurpleLama’s vid, “Q & the Qult: A Multi-Spectrum Analysis”, Bernard Grover explains @ 2:57:

Qanon or more accurately Q is the entity, Qanon is the movement that's spawned from it. And I think that's part of the reason why Trump keeps dodging the question. It’s because people keep asking them about Qanon and he says,”Oh, I don’t know anything about that.”

https://twitter.com/SVNewsAlerts/sta...99390519377921

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Stupid question. There is nothing in the Q drops stating the Democrats are "satanic pedophiles", only that such rings/networks exist, and the evidence strongly implicates political power structures, yes including the left, but also (historically) the right. It is worldwide, and extends far beyond politics.

Ostensibly, the Q drops focus on the corruption of former democrat administrations. But she conveniently sidesteps any mention of that... Of course she does. With the skill of a practised politician herself, she tries to discredit the wider hypothesis by redirecting the viewer's attention to its unthinkable (not believable) subtext.

He negotiated the stupid question the only way he could in my opinion.

This interviewer is yet another disgrace, utterly biased and no different therefore than the moderators. But it's NBC, the mainstream media, and Trump knew it would be like this, because, what is it that they all seem to have in common?

Oh yeh, that.