+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 74 FirstFirst 1 3 13 23 63 74 LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 1467

Thread: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

  1. Link to Post #241
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ddddddddddddddddddddddddd
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 03:57.

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (21st October 2020), chocolate milk (22nd October 2020), Franny (28th October 2020), Gemma13 (23rd October 2020), Gwin Ru (22nd October 2020), janette (21st October 2020), Peace in Oz (22nd October 2020), Savannah (25th October 2020), T Smith (2nd November 2020), wondering (23rd October 2020), Zanshin (22nd October 2020)

  3. Link to Post #242
    Australia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th September 2020
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    282
    Thanked 331 times in 27 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia



    BREAKING: Victoria Police BACKFLIP on protest stance amid Supreme Court challenge

    In an astonishing backflip, today, Victoria Police announced their position change on the legality of protests.
    Assistant Commissioner Luke Cornelius now concedes "protests are a human right".



    Mr Cornelius has previously declared protests illegal as they are "not one of the four permitted reasons to leave home".

    Kerry Cotterill is among hundreds who have previously been fined for protesting while complying to the Cheif Health Officer directives.

    The backflip comes days before our constitutional challenge on the legality of protesting is set to be heard in the Supreme Court.

    Tomorrow protests are planned in Melbourne's CBD.

    More to follow.

    https://www.rebelnews.com/breaking_v...ourt_challenge

    Small businesses are beginning to defy lockdown orders by opening back up. The day after the salon opened it was announced hairdressing salons and some other small businesses could open, shortly after that it was announced we may see more restrictions being lifted for small businesses sooner. This is not just a coincidence. See how powerful we are? See how little pressure is needed for an almost immediate effect? Inspire each other, work together and we the people of the world can take our nations back for our children.

    https://www.rebelnews.com/i_will_open

    Congratulations fellow Aussies!
    Last edited by chocolate milk; 22nd October 2020 at 17:27.

  4. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to chocolate milk For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (22nd October 2020), Constance (22nd October 2020), Eva2 (12th November 2020), Ewan (5th November 2020), Franny (28th October 2020), Gemma13 (23rd October 2020), Gwin Ru (23rd October 2020), janette (22nd October 2020), leavesoftrees (23rd October 2020), Mark (Star Mariner) (28th October 2020), mountain_jim (26th October 2020), Peace in Oz (23rd October 2020), Savannah (25th October 2020), Tintin (22nd October 2020), wondering (23rd October 2020), Zanshin (22nd October 2020)

  5. Link to Post #243
    Australia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th September 2020
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    282
    Thanked 331 times in 27 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    MSM reporting a few hundred protesters.









  6. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to chocolate milk For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd October 2020), Constance (24th October 2020), Eva2 (12th November 2020), Franny (28th October 2020), Gemma13 (24th October 2020), Gwin Ru (24th October 2020), janette (25th October 2020), Lunesoleil (23rd November 2020), Mark (Star Mariner) (28th October 2020), Mike Gorman (28th October 2020), mountain_jim (26th October 2020), Peace in Oz (25th October 2020), Savannah (25th October 2020), twin fig (24th October 2020), wondering (23rd October 2020), Zanshin (25th October 2020)

  7. Link to Post #244
    Avalon Member Gemma13's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2011
    Location
    Western Australia
    Language
    Australian
    Posts
    2,658
    Thanks
    10,021
    Thanked 18,326 times in 2,618 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    Oh for the good 'ol days. The following was posted on Facebook.

    Quote About 35 short years ago everyone had Jobs everywhere, in fact Mums use to stay home and families all lived happily just on Dads wages.

    We had Iron Ore and great steel industries, we had shipbuilding, Car manufacturing, Holden, Chrysler, Mitsubishi, Toyota, Ford even Lightburn made a Zeta, we built TV’s, radio’s, washing machines, Victa lawnmowers, hills hoists & fine furniture manufacturing. We built Car parts and we even made our own tyres at Bridgestone! We had fishing ports all over Australia from Port Lincoln to Brunswick Heads. We made our own cheap Petrol that was refined at Stanvac Oil refinery in SA, Bulimba Refinery in Brisbane. Mortlake Sydney Refinery’s from oil brought in from the Bass Strait, North West Shelf and the Timor Sea.

    We built Aircraft, Boats, Submarines and battlecruisers, Ships, warships. Buses. Locomotives, Diesel-electric trains, as well as the tracks, and you can add hundreds more to that list.

    And everything was “PROUDLY MADE IN AUSTRALIA”

    We had Corner stores and Milk Bars and Deli's, and Hardware shops all over the city and country. Our Rural towns were a hive f activity as they were very strong Communities and were linked by a vast rail network that now lies dormant forever all across the country.
    Flea Markets everywhere on the weekends. All our food was fresh and local. Our Milk and bread were delivered every morning fresh to our doorstep in recyclable glass bottles.

    We paid our rates to the local council to maintain our streets and remove our rubbish. and we use to dump our extra rubbish free at the local tips.
    We had work available as driveway attendants at all our local Service Stations, that was when we had Australian owned Service Stations like GOLDEN FLEECE that even had restaurants owned by H.C. Sleigh... and AMPOL. I even remember good old STANLEY who checked your tyres, checked your oils and washes your windscreen. And at ALL these places you could always find a JOB!!!

    I remember going to Myers, David Jones and Waltons etc to buy Clothes and there was always someone with a tape measure to measure me up and all my NEW clothes fitted perfectly... Today I have to take clothes off the shelves, get them out of the packets, Take them to the fitting room and try them on... If they don't fit put them back and keep trying till you get some that do fit. 2 Hours later take them to the checkout that if it is not a Self Serve checkout. They are scanned and the operator tells me the price... Oh, I say... Can you tell me, the second-hand price, please???? These are new She replies... No, they are not! These shirts smell under the armpits... These are not new at all... How many people before me have tried them on??? I don't know what diseases people have. This is a public health issue.

    We had PUBLIC UTILITIES like Power Stations, Water & Gas which would employ thousand around the Country and it was always so cheap, it would sustain thousands of Industries all over the Nation, this was how thousands of jobs were created.

    We were all taught Respect for others and ourselves at school.

    Then the bloody Government starting selling out our very souls !!!! It started to Corporatise itself and began to compete against private enterprise instead of Govern. Local Councils started to buy up Caravan & Tourist Parks in all the major tourist spots and build Shopping Hubs and rented them out and at the same time dictate to all others what you can and can not do...
    Then we started going downhill.

    All our companies and manufacturers started going offshore or close down because this new corporate government did deals with other countries under free trade agreements that allowed them to totally wipe out our business and manufacturing by allowing the foreign business to start flooding our once great nation with their cheap crap.

    We as Australians use to all watch each other's backs and respect each other and all say G'day with a smile because we were all happy with our freedom and our wonderful democracy. Children could safely go anywhere as long as they were home before dark. Now we just watch each other through security screens and burglar alarms and live in constant FEAR & STRESS.

    These Foreign Countries were allowed to just march in and start taking over and rape and pillage all our resources. They started driving our Farmers off their lands and then sold it to these foreign countries.

    They cut back funding to our education system and slowed down teaching trade skills to our youth and set up 457 visa’s to replace our trade workers with poor quality cheap workers from overseas. These things left our once beautiful Country in tatters!

    Politicians allowed Foreign Countries to buy our Power Stations and guaranteed them that they would always make a profit at our expense no matter what.

    Now because we have lost so much the Government then realised they don't get much income anymore and have to find new ways to make money so it hits it’s own people further in the pocket. They invented things like GST, Excise Taxes, Levy's buy the hundreds on everything. They cut funding to our Emergency Services and forced us to all pay an Emergency Services Levy, they cut funding to our Police and Public housing.

    All our Public owned Forestries were sold off to foreign ownership.

    These new Corporate Government Politicians laughed in our faces and gave themselves MASSIVE pay rises and they all pat themselves on the back knowing that we are so dumb and stupid we would not know what is going on!

    Now they tell us we have to tighten our belts and lose what little we have left to pay back the MASSIVE DEBT they left us all in after gifting other countries billions in foreign aid setting up their countries at the peril of our own...

    Everywhere I shop today just about everything is "MADE IN CHINA" and it dawned on me that every time I buy something made in China I am actually funding China to buy up my own country out from under my feet. We are making China so much profit they can now afford to buy us right out which is exactly what they are doing and our Government is helping them do so.

    Today I drive the main roads around Adelaide and all I see is the empty buildings that once housed all these great manufacturing companies and when I drive past the Holden Plant at Elizebeth totally empty I begin to literally cry for what has happened to my once great nation.

    This overpaid government need more taxes to live on so they are now going to force our elderly (God bless them, for they were the ones that helped build this Nation in the first place) back into the workforce until they are 70. and tell everyone to go out and get a JOB!! But this is NOT just South Australia, this has happened all over Australia.

    So can someone in this new Corporate Government tell us EXACTLY WHERE THESE BLOODY JOBS ARE???????????????????????

    ALL YOU HAD TO DO WAS SELL THE MILK AUSTRALIA... NOT THE WHOLE COW!

    TODAY EVERY SINGLE THING LISTED ABOVE IS NOW GONE, GONE, GONE AND JUST LEFT TO DECAY!!!!

    HOW THIS ONCE MIGHTY 100% SELF SUFFICIENT NATION HAS FALLEN...

    Written by
    Gary J Matthews.
    Last edited by Gemma13; 24th October 2020 at 14:05.

  8. The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to Gemma13 For This Post:

    AlaBil (25th October 2020), Arcturian108 (25th October 2020), avid (25th October 2020), Ba-ba-Ra (24th October 2020), Bill Ryan (24th October 2020), chocolate milk (25th October 2020), Constance (24th October 2020), De Christu (24th April 2021), DeeMetrios (28th October 2020), Dreamer148 (25th October 2020), Ewan (24th October 2020), Franny (28th October 2020), greybeard (24th October 2020), Gwin Ru (24th October 2020), janette (3rd November 2020), Lunesoleil (23rd November 2020), Mark (Star Mariner) (28th October 2020), Peace in Oz (25th October 2020), Savannah (25th October 2020), syrwong (2nd November 2020), wondering (25th October 2020), Zanshin (25th October 2020)

  9. Link to Post #245
    Australia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th September 2020
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    282
    Thanked 331 times in 27 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    More from Avi



    *math

    Don’t miss this next one, Melbourne protesters in fine form. I love them.


  10. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to chocolate milk For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th October 2020), Constance (25th October 2020), DeeMetrios (28th October 2020), Eva2 (12th November 2020), Franny (28th October 2020), Gemma13 (3rd November 2020), greybeard (25th October 2020), Gwin Ru (25th October 2020), janette (25th October 2020), Mark (Star Mariner) (28th October 2020), Mike Gorman (28th October 2020), Peace in Oz (28th October 2020), Savannah (25th October 2020), wondering (25th October 2020), Zanshin (25th October 2020)

  11. Link to Post #246
    Avalon Member Peace in Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th July 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    12,905
    Thanked 1,421 times in 147 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    If the moderators consider this message inappropriate, please remove!

    There was this comment on one of YouTube's videos of Dan Andrews' press conference. I don't know where he's got the information from or whether it is true, time will tell:

    "they want to use future food to control the population via food parcels etc, and this is all to introduce an emergency covid budget which includes a digital only debit card with a balance of $4,500 per person. so when the food begins to run thin in january, and the economy has collapsed after christmas. they can set out an EMERGENCY BUDGET, which could possibly include bailing-in and freezing all bank accounts. hence the debit card which you will live on, jobless while you queue for your food at any of the main chain stores. in your mask of course, awaiting instructions. thats 2021. this man (Dan Andrews) lying through his back teeth."

  12. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Peace in Oz For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (28th October 2020), Constance (28th October 2020), DeeMetrios (28th October 2020), Eva2 (6th November 2020), Ewan (3rd November 2020), Franny (28th October 2020), Gemma13 (3rd November 2020), Gwin Ru (28th October 2020), janette (3rd November 2020), Zanshin (28th October 2020)

  13. Link to Post #247
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 20:32.

  14. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), DeeMetrios (28th October 2020), Eva2 (6th November 2020), Ewan (3rd November 2020), Franny (3rd November 2020), Gemma13 (3rd November 2020), Gwin Ru (28th October 2020), janette (3rd November 2020), Peace in Oz (28th October 2020), petra (23rd November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020), Zanshin (28th October 2020)

  15. Link to Post #248
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 20:32.

  16. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), DeeMetrios (28th October 2020), Ewan (3rd November 2020), Franny (3rd November 2020), Gemma13 (3rd November 2020), Gracy (28th October 2020), Gwin Ru (28th October 2020), janette (3rd November 2020), Johan (Keyholder) (2nd November 2020), Peace in Oz (28th October 2020), petra (23rd November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020), Zanshin (28th October 2020)

  17. Link to Post #249
    Avalon Member Peace in Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th July 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    12,905
    Thanked 1,421 times in 147 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    Resistance is slowly taking shape.
    Police blow whistle on coronavirus deception
    NSW Police Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions:

    "A LETTER written by a senior constable from the Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol and signed by colleagues, has exposed the COVID-19 narrative for its deception and the harm it is causing to police and their relations with the public.

    The letter, dated October 26, is addressed to NSW Commissioner of Police Michael Fuller and is one of the best rebuttals of the COVID narrative of fear and control written anywhere, noting false predictions of its severity, false and misleading statistics, flaws in testing and serious questions around the virus itself.

    The letter makes the very strong point that in the same way they cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device on motorists, the same must be demanded of the RT PCR test and as such, “police should not in any way” mandate testing for COVID-19, or rely on the results.

    For police to raise this within their own ranks may be portrayed as controversial but the action is consistent with common law enforcement, e.g. investigating, exposing and prosecuting a crime of deception carried out against the public.

    The letter signatories are urging fellow police officers across the country to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or to sign their form at this link. https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth

    The letter reads:
    RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions

    We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force. Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules. Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.

    With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths [2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.

    With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”. [3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.

    We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors, such that experts who later reviewed it have said “no serious scientist gives (it) any validity”. [4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should “never be used to diagnose infectious disease”, because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.

    In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results. Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon, in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response. Here are some statistics which reflect this reality:

    For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic [9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2% [10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immuno-compromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12] At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%. [13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%. [14] Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting.

    Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable, and Taiwan’s is outstanding. The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.

    We note from the recent Federal budget, huge debt and unemployment, is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses. In our line of work, we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing.

    We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” [15] So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18]

    What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 [19], when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [20, 21, 22]. Instead, the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca [23] and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives.

    AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims, kickbacks and bribery, consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations. [24] Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine [25].

    Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed.

    All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable.

    We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring. Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.

    These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28] (Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first).

    There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework. Article 7 of the international convenient of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” [31]

    Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise “A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.” [32] Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. [33]

    Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency being valid.” [34] With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36].

    Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-

    Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines;
    The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines;
    Police do not participate in any way in the forcing of vaccines upon the population;
    That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated
    To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and
    To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government.

    Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC’s [37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government [38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity [40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘the experts’, all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules. We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: –

    Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which: Places integrity above all; Upholds the rule of law; Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals; Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing; Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction; Capitalises on the wealth of human resources; Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly.

    Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence.

    We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth to show your support for this stance, which we have called Cops for Covid Truth. With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust, by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.

    Regards
    Alexander Cooney Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol
    NSW Police Force Grafton Police Station
    5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460

    And other signatories"

    https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth
    https://cairnsnews.org/2020/11/02/po...rus-deception/

  18. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Peace in Oz For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), Constance (2nd November 2020), Delight (3rd November 2020), Ewan (3rd November 2020), Franny (4th November 2020), Gemma13 (3rd November 2020), gini (3rd November 2020), Gwin Ru (3rd November 2020), janette (3rd November 2020), Johan (Keyholder) (2nd November 2020), JohanB (2nd November 2020), kfm27917 (2nd November 2020), Tintin (2nd November 2020), Tracie (Bodhicee) (3rd November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020), Zanshin (3rd November 2020)

  19. Link to Post #250
    Avalon Member Gemma13's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2011
    Location
    Western Australia
    Language
    Australian
    Posts
    2,658
    Thanks
    10,021
    Thanked 18,326 times in 2,618 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    WOW, just WOW. So encouraging to read this statement from our Police Officers. Covers all bases from wrongfully stopping protests, to false Covid data and false testing, to Hyrdochloroquine, to Government tyranny, etc.

    So proud of these guys

    Unfortunately Serene Teffaha, the solicitor compiling the stats and report, who is credible, isn't a particularly polished public speaker. She's very, rightly, passionate which makes her an easy target to discredit. Unfair, yes, but it is what it is.

    With a bit of luck some of the more "optics acceptable" public personas will grab and run with this. We'll have to wait and see.

    Quote Posted by Miha (here)
    Resistance is slowly taking shape.
    Police blow whistle on coronavirus deception
    NSW Police Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions:

    "A LETTER written by a senior constable from the Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol and signed by colleagues, has exposed the COVID-19 narrative for its deception and the harm it is causing to police and their relations with the public.

    The letter, dated October 26, is addressed to NSW Commissioner of Police Michael Fuller and is one of the best rebuttals of the COVID narrative of fear and control written anywhere, noting false predictions of its severity, false and misleading statistics, flaws in testing and serious questions around the virus itself.

    The letter makes the very strong point that in the same way they cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device on motorists, the same must be demanded of the RT PCR test and as such, “police should not in any way” mandate testing for COVID-19, or rely on the results.

    For police to raise this within their own ranks may be portrayed as controversial but the action is consistent with common law enforcement, e.g. investigating, exposing and prosecuting a crime of deception carried out against the public.

    The letter signatories are urging fellow police officers across the country to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or to sign their form at this link. https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth

    The letter reads:
    RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions

    We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force. Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules. Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.

    With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths [2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.

    With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”. [3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.

    We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors, such that experts who later reviewed it have said “no serious scientist gives (it) any validity”. [4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should “never be used to diagnose infectious disease”, because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.

    In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results. Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon, in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response. Here are some statistics which reflect this reality:

    For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic [9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2% [10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immuno-compromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12] At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%. [13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%. [14] Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting.

    Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable, and Taiwan’s is outstanding. The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.

    We note from the recent Federal budget, huge debt and unemployment, is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses. In our line of work, we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing.

    We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” [15] So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18]

    What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 [19], when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [20, 21, 22]. Instead, the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca [23] and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives.

    AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims, kickbacks and bribery, consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations. [24] Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine [25].

    Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed.

    All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable.

    We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring. Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.

    These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28] (Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first).

    There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework. Article 7 of the international convenient of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” [31]

    Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise “A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.” [32] Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. [33]

    Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency being valid.” [34] With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36].

    Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-

    Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines;
    The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines;
    Police do not participate in any way in the forcing of vaccines upon the population;
    That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated
    To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and
    To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government.

    Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC’s [37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government [38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity [40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘the experts’, all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules. We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: –

    Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which: Places integrity above all; Upholds the rule of law; Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals; Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing; Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction; Capitalises on the wealth of human resources; Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly.

    Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence.

    We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth to show your support for this stance, which we have called Cops for Covid Truth. With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust, by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.

    Regards
    Alexander Cooney Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol
    NSW Police Force Grafton Police Station
    5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460

    And other signatories"

    https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth
    https://cairnsnews.org/2020/11/02/po...rus-deception/
    Last edited by Gemma13; 3rd November 2020 at 03:45.

  20. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Gemma13 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), Constance (3rd November 2020), Ewan (3rd November 2020), Franny (3rd November 2020), greybeard (3rd November 2020), Gwin Ru (3rd November 2020), janette (3rd November 2020), Mike Gorman (23rd November 2020), Peace in Oz (3rd November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020), Zanshin (3rd November 2020)

  21. Link to Post #251
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    55
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    4,668
    Thanked 1,524 times in 268 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    Ordinary aussie and kiwi folk raising awareness of the systemic pedo protection racket running rampant through the judiciary and government

    https://m.facebook.com/riseupforchil...story.php&_rdr

    #RiseUp #SaveOurChildren #GetLoud #LiftTheSupressionOrder #ExposePedophilia
    Last edited by Zanshin; 3rd November 2020 at 16:14.

  22. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), Constance (3rd November 2020), Franny (4th November 2020), Gwin Ru (4th November 2020), janette (4th November 2020), Peace in Oz (4th November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020)

  23. Link to Post #252
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    55
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    4,668
    Thanked 1,524 times in 268 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?sto...4&id=701190763

    Sign the Petition This is about the children ❤

    https://www.aph.gov.au/petition_list?id=EN1856

    Petition signing closes Nov. 4th


    Petition Reason
    On 20th October 2015, Senator Heffernan brought to Parliament and Australia's attention, official documents presented during the Wood Royal Commission and again during Royal Commission into Ritual and Sexual Abuse within Institutions. These documents include police documents, naming 28 high profile paedophiles, including one former Prime Minister. Investigation into these documents were stopped. The government and Judiciary have been noted suppressing these documents with orders for 90 years, choosing not to investigate as the public would ‘lose faith in the judiciary’. The public have already lost faith in the Government and Judiciary. This is compounded by these suppression orders. We the Australians with integrity and honour stand against these suppression orders and wish to protect our children. We insist these people and institutions be fully investigated, and held to account, including those whom have chosen to cover and suppress any investigations.

    Petition Request
    We therefore ask the House to 1: Lift the 90 year Suppression Orders on these documents. 2: Create and support permanently, Independent Corruption and Integrity Commission to investigate ANY and ALL corruption exposed within Government, Judiciary and other formal Institutions. 3: Investigate these particular documents suppressed, and bring those guilty to account. 4: Bring justice to the victims and survivors, by exposing those people and systems in place that are corrupt and currently hidden. 5: Clean the institutions of all corruption, to start bringing the public’s faith back, showing that our government and judiciary will be honest and work for the people of Australia, while protecting our children’s future.

  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), Constance (3rd November 2020), Franny (4th November 2020), Gwin Ru (4th November 2020), janette (4th November 2020), Peace in Oz (4th November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020)

  25. Link to Post #253
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 20:27.

  26. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd November 2020), Ewan (5th November 2020), Franny (4th November 2020), greybeard (4th November 2020), Gwin Ru (4th November 2020), janette (4th November 2020), Mike (4th November 2020), Peace in Oz (4th November 2020), wondering (3rd November 2020), Zanshin (3rd November 2020)

  27. Link to Post #254
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 20:28.

  28. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th November 2020), Ewan (5th November 2020), Franny (5th November 2020), Gracy (4th November 2020), Gwin Ru (5th November 2020), Icare (16th November 2020), janette (4th November 2020), Peace in Oz (4th November 2020), Zanshin (4th November 2020)

  29. Link to Post #255
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    55
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    4,668
    Thanked 1,524 times in 268 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    Quote Posted by Constance (here)
    I am sharing this information here because what I want to say about protesting is that whenever we protest, it brings the whole morphic field down. The elite are energetic beings too... They love it when people are fighting against something/resisting because they understand exactly what happens to our energy fields when we do.

    See my post here for a practical example of how, whenever we project our energies against ourselves or another, it affects our energies.

    There are other ways we can take our power back...
    I agree Constance -

    Having studied contract/commercial law for over a decade now, with specific focus on rebutting the adhesion contracts (hidden contracts) we are deemed to agree with, through our actions, or by our silence, or failure to rebut sufficiently -

    Protest and lawful assembly/rebellion are not the same thing

    If one has made every reasonable attempt to notice the relevant 'authority' of breaches, without receiving response or achieving remedy - then lawful assembly/rebellion is a duty and obligation required of the citizenry to hold the government to account.

    If one decides to gather in protest without noticing the 'authorities' - this is construed as breach of contracts agreed to by tacit acquiescence, justifying the 'appropriate' use of force required to disperse said protest.

    *****************

    The pen is mightier than the sword. The only facts in a matter are the agreement between the parties. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in commerce.

    Write a letter addressing the issue and mail it to the head of gov. dept. (police commissioner/ attorney general/ head politician/etc.)

    Attach an affidavit - simply the witnessed word of the real wo/man.

    Send it by registered post and then certify the non-response (a corporate legal fiction can not rebut an affidavit).

    After 30 days send a notice of default using the certified non-response to demonstrate the govt. agrees with your position by it's silence (tacit acquiescence).

    Then assemble lawfully, to address holding a government to account, for disregarding the will of the people.

    N.B. This does not mean one will be treated any differently than a 'protestor' by a state officer who is ignorant of the law -
    it does however create lawful standing for subsequent attempts by the state, to enforce 'legal breach notices' etc.

    The strength of processes such as this will only truly be made manifest through strength in numbers, the power of the people.

    To quote Christian Walters - They don't amount to a hill of beans compared to the rest of us.

    *****************

    This simply reverses the process used 'legally' by 'the state'.

    Petitions and pleadings - are seen as begging for relief from an 'authority' to be granted or denied seemingly on a whim.

    Lawful notices created with the certified agreement of 'the state', by non-response - are powerful tools, to be wielded responsibly, by informed and educated men and women for the benefit of all.

    I'll leave it to the discernment of readers to evaluate the level of success gained through the use of different strategies as seen below.


    Last edited by Zanshin; 5th November 2020 at 02:45.

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th November 2020), Constance (5th November 2020), Eva2 (6th November 2020), Ewan (5th November 2020), Franny (5th November 2020), Gwin Ru (5th November 2020), Peace in Oz (5th November 2020)

  31. Link to Post #256
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 20:25.

  32. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th November 2020), Ewan (5th November 2020), Franny (5th November 2020), Gwin Ru (5th November 2020), Patient (12th November 2020), Peace in Oz (5th November 2020), petra (23rd November 2020), Zanshin (5th November 2020)

  33. Link to Post #257
    Australia Avalon Member Zanshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th November 2013
    Age
    55
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    4,668
    Thanked 1,524 times in 268 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    Quote Posted by Constance (here)
    Thanks for your thoughts there Zanshin

    My rhetorical questions about any or all of these things is not addressed to yourself specifically, rather, these are questions are aimed at everyone:

    Why do we need governments?
    Why do we have to entertain anything that this system has to currently offer if it doesn't serve us?
    Why would we want to waste any of our time or energy trying to remedy a system that was created by the elite in the first instance?
    Why are we trying to solve this problem at the same level of consciousness that created it?
    Why not create a new model and a system instead?

    Excellent questions Constance which, far from being off-topic or even rhetorical, I would consider very pertinent.

    So here is my brief shot at addressing them -

    I'll begin with a quote from Theodore Roosevelt at the Jamestown Exposition 1907:

    It behooves us to remember that men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others. If from lawlessness or fickleness, from folly or self-indulgence, they refuse to govern themselves, then most assuredly in the end they will have to be governed from the outside. They can prevent the need of government from without only by showing that they possess the power of government from within. A sovereign cannot make excuses for his failures; a sovereign must accept the responsibility for the exercise of the power that inheres in him; and where, as is true in our Republic, the people are sovereign, then the people must show a sober understanding and a sane and steadfast purpose if they are to preserve that orderly liberty upon which as a foundation every republic must rest. (At Jamestown Exposition, April 26, 1907.) Mem. Ed. XII, 593; Nat. Ed. XI, 312.

    I would venture that very few of us do not enjoy at least some of the benefits and privileges afforded by modern society and further, would absolutely prefer it to the other option available - the life of the hermit in the cave or the forest. As soon as we come together in community, we must make concession to others if we are to coexist successfully, with some form of council or governing body seeming historically to be the natural progression toward facilitating this goal.
    The complexity of modern society also dictates that systems be implemented for management of infrastructure, distribution of services, protection of individuals and said society, with the inevitable management of infringements and infringers upon these systems.

    If the spectrum of systems of governance range from one extreme being: all the tyrannical totalitarian 'isms' (fascism, nazism, communism, etc.);
    through the varied degrees of representative democracies and republics;
    to arrive at the other extreme being: anarchy, which could perhaps most correctly be defined as the complete absence of the need for organized government as everyone governs themselves -

    it follows that there are those amongst us who are incapable of self-governance, be it through lack of physical or mental ability, or simple ignorance and/or lack of inclination do so.
    post edit: leading to the conclusion that all societies will require governance which will fit somewhere on this spectrum tending away from anarchy

    All that said, I would further venture that each of us must accept our part in the development of the current system to exactly how it is today.

    If we are not actively involved in working toward a better society; or actively informing those that are, of our express will and intent; then, under the most fundamental laws of contract, we are in agreement, by our inaction and silence, that our participation in said society is voluntary.

    I would not be the first to state that the system has been hijacked by private interests - in banking, in the courts and governments, by rampant unchecked corporatism and cultism of all forms, however -
    we still need to acknowledge ownership of this system as ours, hijacked though it may be, and accept responsibility for effecting and implementing remedies.

    It has long been my position that, discussions centered around which government model has most merit, are exercises in futility without addressing the system hijackers -

    *the private central bank cartels, manufacturing scarcity through usury and fractional reserve 'lending' (debt creation) - where (interest free) creation and issuance of a nations currency must rightly remain with the treasury of a minimalist administrative government for the prosperity of all.

    *the private law club, The Bar Society - operating out of The City of London, which administers the negotiation of commercial instruments for the gain of their private, for-profit 'courts' rather than dispensing justice for the people.

    *the private religious cult operating out of The Vatican - where pope Boniface laid claim to title to the world in 1302 under Unum Sanctum, an express trust by papal bull, which, along with subsequent testamentary trusts also created by papal bulls, I've been told were written on 'parchment of kid' - the tanned hide of sacrificed infants, to create 'living laws' for control of title to the lands of the earth, the peoples of the earth and the souls of the earth.

    I would suggest that creating a new system from scratch would be such a mammoth undertaking as to be impossible and further, unnecessary when all that is required is to take back our system - our buildings, our resources, our infrastructure - from the hijackers, by unified effort and concerted will of the people.

    I see more evidence every day that the consciousness of the people is rising - with perhaps the current challenges being necessary and inevitable
    for the critical mass to rise to the requisite level of education and commitment to fulfill the duties and obligations that come with the benefits and privileges
    of participating in any society.
    Last edited by Zanshin; 5th November 2020 at 07:43.

  34. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Zanshin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th November 2020), Constance (5th November 2020), Eva2 (6th November 2020), Ewan (5th November 2020), Franny (23rd November 2020), Gwin Ru (5th November 2020), Icare (16th November 2020), Peace in Oz (5th November 2020), Sue (Ayt) (5th November 2020)

  35. Link to Post #258
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,448
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,479 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
    Last edited by Constance; 14th November 2021 at 20:17.

  36. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Alecs (12th November 2020), avid (12th November 2020), Bill Ryan (12th November 2020), Ernie Nemeth (12th November 2020), Eva2 (12th November 2020), Ewan (12th November 2020), Franny (23rd November 2020), graciousb (18th November 2020), Gwin Ru (13th November 2020), Icare (16th November 2020), Peace in Oz (13th November 2020), petra (23rd November 2020), Tintin (12th November 2020), wondering (12th November 2020), Zanshin (30th November 2020)

  37. Link to Post #259
    Avalon Member Peace in Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th July 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    12,905
    Thanked 1,421 times in 147 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    NSW rolling out mandatory QR check in system. They want all the businesses to use it. Victoria also adopted this QR digital contact tracing system in the state institutions.


    Chinese President Xi Proposes GLOBAL Health QR Code System to Revive Coronavirus-Battered Trade & Travel
    https://www.infowars.com/posts/chine...-trade-travel/

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Peace in Oz For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd November 2020), Constance (23rd November 2020), Franny (23rd November 2020), pueblo (23rd November 2020), Zanshin (30th November 2020)

  39. Link to Post #260
    UK Avalon Member Mike Gorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    67
    Posts
    2,197
    Thanks
    6,840
    Thanked 17,468 times in 2,077 posts

    Default Re: Extreme Covid measures in Australia

    Quote Posted by Gemma13 (here)
    WOW, just WOW. So encouraging to read this statement from our Police Officers. Covers all bases from wrongfully stopping protests, to false Covid data and false testing, to Hyrdochloroquine, to Government tyranny, etc.

    So proud of these guys

    Unfortunately Serene Teffaha, the solicitor compiling the stats and report, who is credible, isn't a particularly polished public speaker. She's very, rightly, passionate which makes her an easy target to discredit. Unfair, yes, but it is what it is.

    With a bit of luck some of the more "optics acceptable" public personas will grab and run with this. We'll have to wait and see.

    Quote Posted by Miha (here)
    Resistance is slowly taking shape.
    Police blow whistle on coronavirus deception
    NSW Police Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions:

    "A LETTER written by a senior constable from the Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol and signed by colleagues, has exposed the COVID-19 narrative for its deception and the harm it is causing to police and their relations with the public.

    The letter, dated October 26, is addressed to NSW Commissioner of Police Michael Fuller and is one of the best rebuttals of the COVID narrative of fear and control written anywhere, noting false predictions of its severity, false and misleading statistics, flaws in testing and serious questions around the virus itself.

    The letter makes the very strong point that in the same way they cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device on motorists, the same must be demanded of the RT PCR test and as such, “police should not in any way” mandate testing for COVID-19, or rely on the results.

    For police to raise this within their own ranks may be portrayed as controversial but the action is consistent with common law enforcement, e.g. investigating, exposing and prosecuting a crime of deception carried out against the public.

    The letter signatories are urging fellow police officers across the country to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or to sign their form at this link. https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth

    The letter reads:
    RE: Open Letter Concerning the Police Enforcement of ongoing COVID-19 restrictions

    We are writing to you to raise concerns we have about the use of the police to enforce the ongoing restrictions placed upon our citizens relating to COVID-19, which has seriously eroded community trust in our great police force. Since the Attorney General Declared a State of Emergency for the novel coronavirus, our governments have acted upon certain powers to impose restrictions on its citizens, using the police to enforce their rules. Due to the novel nature of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, most people concurred that certain restrictions should be followed, until more was learnt about the virus.

    With the initial modelling from the Imperial College in the UK [1] and the Peter Doherty Institute here in Australia, indicating a catastrophic number of cases that would severely burden our hospital system and could result in up to 150,000 Australian deaths [2], it is easy to comprehend why our governments would respond as they did and why the vast population would comply.

    With these frightening projections it became evident that we needed to find a way to quickly diagnose the disease. Yet the Centre for Disease Control in the US states that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”. [3] So even without the virus being isolated, the RT PCR test was picked to become the gold standard for testing.

    We note that the modelling was later found to have serious calculation errors, such that experts who later reviewed it have said “no serious scientist gives (it) any validity”. [4, 5] And now the RT PCR test has been proven to be unreliable at best, with the inventor stating it should “never be used to diagnose infectious disease”, because it cannot tell if what it detected is alive or dead. [6, 7, 8] This test is still being relied upon to make critical decisions in the interest of public health and safety.

    In the same way we cannot use an inaccurate speed detection device to proctor a civilian’s speed, the same must be demanded of a faulty RT PCR test and as such, police should not in any way mandate testing for covid-19, or rely on any outcome of the results. Now that we have almost 12 months of statistical data that can be relied upon, in place of flawed computer modelling, these statistics show a reality that is far from the modelling projections, which were relied upon by National Cabinet in their response. Here are some statistics which reflect this reality:

    For example, we now know that around 45% of people who contract the virus are asymptomatic [9] and asymptomatic transmission is between 0-2.2% [10]. We also know that 80% of people who contract the virus will only have mild symptoms [11] and it is overwhelmingly the elderly and immuno-compromised who are at risk of severe symptoms that could result in death. [12] At the time of writing, the world-wide survival rate for covid-19 is 97.3%. [13] The ordinary flu is 99.9%. [14] Furthermore, statistics clearly show that while the confirmed cases may be on the rise, the percentage of deaths is plummeting.

    Sweden and Taiwan did not enforce lockdown on its citizens like much of the world did. Although Sweden failed to take better precautions to protect the elderly in the early stages, their death rate is comparable, and Taiwan’s is outstanding. The statistics show there is a high infection rate across the globe, but very low deaths; regardless of whether there was forced lockdowns or not. What we can derive from analysis of this is that these two distinctly different ways have resulted in much the same outcome.

    We note from the recent Federal budget, huge debt and unemployment, is that our lockdowns have created a series of problems that now seem to outweigh the threat this virus poses. In our line of work, we know that the socioeconomical problems created here will transpire into a greater threat down the track, as people struggle to deal with the collateral damage this is causing.

    We have been told that the advice from the World Health Organization is a key aspect to the National Cabinet response, yet Dr David Nabarro of the WHO recently stated “We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” [15] So in spite of the facts, as they stand now, it would appear that the National Cabinet has been lagging in its capacity to adapt to the reality of the situation and this is causing them to fail in their duty to respond in proportion to the risk. The risk being overwhelmingly with the elderly and immunocompromised. [16, 17, 18]

    What is even more concerning is the prohibition on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 [19], when over 121 peer reviewed scientific studies have shown it to be effective in treating and preventing the disease [20, 21, 22]. Instead, the federal government has done a vaccine deal with AstraZeneca [23] and Australians told we cannot expect to go back to normal until a vaccine arrives.

    AstraZeneca has been found guilty of offences relating to off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products, making false claims, kickbacks and bribery, consumer protection violation, healthcare offences, government-contracting violations and more. Since 2000 they have been fined over US$1.1billion dollars for these offences and violations. [24] Still, they have been granted protection from future product liability claims relating to its COVID-19 vaccine [25].

    Alarmingly, Prime Minister Scott Morrison stated they will make the vaccine “as mandatory as you can possibly make it” [26], in spite of the criminal record of its producer, their exemption from liability claims, the fact we already have at least two approved and extremely safe medications in Ivermectin [27] and hydroxychloroquine; shown to be effective treatments and the reality that the virus does not pose a serious threat to the healthy. It seems these decisions appear to be corporate interests, not in the best interests of public health and wellbeing as is claimed.

    All this indicates that the ongoing restrictions on the healthy population is a disproportionate response, yet the police are still expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. The evidence would suggest resources are better directed to protect the vulnerable.

    We are concerned with the legitimacy of the actions we are being told to take against the citizens of Australia. States and territories cannot rise above the commonwealth constitution as well as international treaties we are signatories to, yet this is occurring. Under the state of emergency, the emergency requirements are qualified and restricted by the significant fact that emergency requirements and directions cannot request an individual to be isolated, detained, tested, vaccinated, medically treated or bodily searched in the absence of a biosecurity control order issued to the individual.

    These measures are referred to as biosecurity measures and are captured under Subdivision B of Division 3 of Part 3 of Chapter 2 of the Biosecurity Act 2015. [28] (Emergency and public health powers, at the States and Territories, do not provide a carte blanche to breach an individual’s human rights by isolating them, or detaining them or testing them without the proper required notifications and risk assessments first).

    There is an inter-governmental agreement [29] which places the Commonwealth in the lead as well as the Australian Health Sector Emergency Response Plan [30]. This ensures that the States and Territories act to compliment the Federal Legislative Framework. Article 7 of the international convenient of civil and political rights states “no-one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.” [31]

    Article 27 of the Vienna convention on the law of treatise “A party may not invoke the provision of its internal law as justification of its failure to perform a treaty.” [32] Article 7 of the Australian human rights commission Act 1986 states “no-one should be subjected to torture or to cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, in particular, no-one shall be subject without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. [33]

    Section 109 of the commonwealth of Australia constitution states “when a law of a state is inconsistent with a law of the commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall to the extent of the inconsistency being valid.” [34] With federal and international legislation breaches, it will be taken that we are complicit and consensual in their undertaking on the people of Australia, potentially rendering us criminally liable under the Crimes Act 1914 [35], as well as the Criminal Code Act 1995 [36].

    Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccinations. We feel a real calling to do our part to stop this oppression, so we are writing to you to raise the following issues:-

    Police Force employees have ‘choice’ as to whether or not to receive vaccines;
    The Police believe that all members of the community also have choice around receiving vaccines;
    Police do not participate in any way in the forcing of vaccines upon the population;
    That the Police Association start preparing to defend Police employees who choose to not be vaccinated
    To raise the alarm that there is a global dictatorship occurring and the Police Force is being used as a tool to push these global and corporate agendas upon the population; and
    To warn the Police Force not to simply acquiesce to these requests, rules and laws and to act in the best interest of its population, not tyranny of government.

    Recently letters have been written to our leaders from the legal fraternity, including high profile Judges and QC’s [37], The Australian Institute for Progress penned by 30 public intellectuals including 15 professors of relevant disciplines, one of whom is an advisor on health and well-being economics to the UK government [38], Advocate Me’s open letter to all leaders seeking to review disproportionate response to SAR-CoV-2 [39], as well as hundreds of doctors from the medical fraternity [40]. Despite the government continually parroting that they are following the advice of ‘the experts’, all these requests have been ignored and the police used as the enforcers of these senseless rules. We ask that you consider the information provided herein and the NSW Police Force statement of values: –

    Each member of the Police Force is to Act in a manner which: Places integrity above all; Upholds the rule of law; Preserves the rights and freedoms of individuals; Seeks to improve the quality of life by community involvement in policing; Strives for citizen and police personal satisfaction; Capitalises on the wealth of human resources; Makes efficient and economical use of public resources; and Ensures that authority is exercised responsibly.

    Many of us believe that we are removing our own rights and freedoms by enforcing these rules upon the community, including our family and friends. And the community are confounded by the intensified police enforcement around peaceful freedom protests and how inconsistent this was when compared with the Black Lives Matter protests. This contradiction is further destroying public confidence.

    We are reaching out to all our fellow police officers across the country, to write a similar letter to their respective police commissioners, or sign our form at https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth to show your support for this stance, which we have called Cops for Covid Truth. With trust in our police force now seriously eroded, we ask you to consider now challenging the necessity of the ongoing restrictions to restore community trust, by being an integral part of returning our State and Country back to normality.

    Regards
    Alexander Cooney Senior Constable Coffs/Clarence Highway Patrol
    NSW Police Force Grafton Police Station
    5 Duke Street Grafton NSW 2460

    And other signatories"

    https://advocateme.wixsite.com/copsforcovidtruth
    https://cairnsnews.org/2020/11/02/po...rus-deception/
    This Alexander Cooney is a switched on, intelligent fellow! I am greatly encouraged by this letter, he has described the situation with great clarity.

  40. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike Gorman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd November 2020), Peace in Oz (23rd November 2020), Zanshin (30th November 2020)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 74 FirstFirst 1 3 13 23 63 74 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts