The 'Great Reset'

[Gwin Ru]

...

[TargeT]

Posted by viking (here)
We can emerge from this crisis a better world, if we act quickly and jointly, writes Professor Klaus Schwab.

The changes we have already seen in response to COVID-19 prove that a reset of our economic and social foundations is possible.

This is our best chance to instigate stakeholder capitalism - and here's how it can be achieved.

More here...
https://www.activistpost.com/2020/06...0cfa-387770973

Viking

Funny how well they sold it originally, and now we know it's a complete NWO scam... sad

[Eva2]

Canadian petition to stop the "Socialist" Great Reset:

https://thepostmillennial.com/conser...YEFOFb_E1-OPpA

[kfm27917]

(maybe not the best place on PA but definitely related)
Throughout the four-year drama of Russiagate, the hand of British intelligence has revealed itself continuously...

From the obvious role of Sir Richard Dearlove and his former MI6 underlying Christopher Steele who together played a driving role in shaping the dodgy dossier, to their involvement with Oxford Rhodes Scholar Strobe Talbott in composing, promoting and marketing the fraudulent dossier to targeted members of Congress and media, to British Ambassador Sir Darroch caught “flooding the zone” with British intelligence assets to shape Trump’s perception of the world, to the array of British entrapment operations that targeted Michael Flynn as early as 2014 in London… wherever one looks, the hand of British intelligence seems to be everywhere.

While vast effort is made to downplay the British roots of the deep state by the media which tends to portray this problem from a partisan narrative of “democratic party corruption”, this sleight of hand misses the causal nexus and demands we believe that the tail truly wags the dog.

read the story at
https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...-scales-again/

[TargeT]

Posted by kfm27917 (here)
(maybe not the best place on PA but definitely related)
Throughout the four-year drama of Russiagate, the hand of British intelligence has revealed itself continuously...

From the obvious role of Sir Richard Dearlove and his former MI6 underlying Christopher Steele who together played a driving role in shaping the dodgy dossier, to their involvement with Oxford Rhodes Scholar Strobe Talbott in composing, promoting and marketing the fraudulent dossier to targeted members of Congress and media, to British Ambassador Sir Darroch caught “flooding the zone” with British intelligence assets to shape Trump’s perception of the world, to the array of British entrapment operations that targeted Michael Flynn as early as 2014 in London… wherever one looks, the hand of British intelligence seems to be everywhere.

While vast effort is made to downplay the British roots of the deep state by the media which tends to portray this problem from a partisan narrative of “democratic party corruption”, this sleight of hand misses the causal nexus and demands we believe that the tail truly wags the dog.

read the story at
https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...-scales-again/

I working the IC, we have been restricting info we share with F V E Y pretty heavily.... I'd say that means we are onto what has been happening and are quietly changing course.....

this is a 180 from previous behavior and a part of why I'm so positive that everything is under control.

[Tintin]

Posted by kfm27917 (here)
(maybe not the best place on PA but definitely related)
Throughout the four-year drama of Russiagate, the hand of British intelligence has revealed itself continuously...

From the obvious role of Sir Richard Dearlove and his former MI6 underlying Christopher Steele who together played a driving role in shaping the dodgy dossier, to their involvement with Oxford Rhodes Scholar Strobe Talbott in composing, promoting and marketing the fraudulent dossier to targeted members of Congress and media, to British Ambassador Sir Darroch caught “flooding the zone” with British intelligence assets to shape Trump’s perception of the world, to the array of British entrapment operations that targeted Michael Flynn as early as 2014 in London… wherever one looks, the hand of British intelligence seems to be everywhere.

While vast effort is made to downplay the British roots of the deep state by the media which tends to portray this problem from a partisan narrative of “democratic party corruption”, this sleight of hand misses the causal nexus and demands we believe that the tail truly wags the dog.

read the story at
https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...-scales-again/

Great article. Yes, for quite some time now I've suspected something very similar with meddling. I'd be extraordinarily surprised if British Intelligence didn't have its hands involved in the election scenario playing out.

I'd found a Whitney Webb article earlier that I was going to post up that tackles a very similar angle. That Trump has his hands tied with the Julian Assange situation and the transatlantic deep state elements collusion in Julian Assange's incarceration ought to be hint enough, even though sufficient numbers of us here already know this is a centuries old collaboration.

Many many roads lead back to the City of London and the private members' clubs in West London.

[ExomatrixTV]

⚠️ War on Independent Media ‼️ 🤔

[pueblo]

The NYT ran an article yesterday titled...

The baseless ‘Great Reset’ conspiracy theory rises again.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11...ry-rises-again

(*Article is behind a paywall)

Someone however forgot to tell Klaus Schwab (Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum) that it was just a "baseless conspiracy theory"!



It seems Time magazine did not receive the NYT memo either..

THE GREAT RESET

The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to think about the kind of future we want. TIME partnered with the World Economic Forum to ask leading thinkers to share ideas for how to transform the way we live and work.

https://time.com/collection/great-reset/

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by pueblo (here)
The NYT ran an article yesterday titled...

The baseless ‘Great Reset’ conspiracy theory rises again.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11...ry-rises-again


(*Article is behind a paywall)

Someone however forgot to tell Klaus Schwab (Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum) that it was just a "baseless conspiracy theory"!



It seems Time magazine did not receive the NYT memo either..

THE GREAT RESET

The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to think about the kind of future we want. TIME partnered with the World Economic Forum to ask leading thinkers to share ideas for how to transform the way we live and work.

https://time.com/collection/great-reset/

Imagine millions of people finding The "Authoritative" New York Times Article about how to judge "Conspiracy Theories" dealing with The Great Reset is "good enough" to form an "informed & balanced" opinion WITHOUT having any notion of all the different forms of genuine & legit concerns & critical thinking NYT never will include ... only seeking the weakest arguments and it blow up out of proportions to misrepresent a group of people who do not necessarily think all the same but will they be framed like that anyway!

Main goal is to give a feeling to justify NEVER to consider alternative points of view ... Shy away from real critical thinking because they did "the thinking" for you so that you do not have to feel "uncomfortable" when confronted with alarming new insights & perspectives ... on top of that you do not want to be labeled that you are "responsible" to help spread "deceptive "crackpot conspiracy theories" etc.

For me its obvious that NYT is promoting toxic "group think mentality" hive mind tribalism mixed with people having mass induced anxieties & fears serving to keep people (the masses) "in line" with Agenda 2030 especially all others who work for Mainstream Media (News Papers, Magazines, Radio & TV etc.).

There will NEVER be an honest representation (by NYT) of that what they attack but they demand you do if you expose them of their tactics. ... Which we do not find hard to do as they expose themselves by NOT sharing an honest & intelligent summery that does do justice to what critical freethinkers from many different backgrounds stand for. They count on you being lazy.

🌐 Most likely they damn well know they use Strawman Argument Fallacy Tactics but do not care if you know as long as the vast majority does not know they do not care, as long it works to keep the masses in line with the agenda.

For me there is a very simple solution to all of this.

Ask yourself these 2 deep questions:

01. Where can I find a real honest open debate where both (or more) sides are not misrepresented and not getting framed with endless false assumptions/insinuations/accusations that begs to be corrected ... and if you do correct them there is mostly no time left to bring the real (constructive) content based discussion focused on what most important issues are that will affect all of us! ... It is almost they want to prevent that by default like a magician on a stage using (endless) distraction techniques to fool/deceive our perceptions.

02. Why do (I have the perception that) so many blindly trust it is "okay" NOT have a question like question number 01. I just shared here? ... Is it pure mental, emotional & spiritual laziness?... Is it fear that allows them to dictate "how" you have to deal with controversial issues? ... Is it that most people "have no time", "no energy", feel no responsibility to educate themselves differently that is beyond the mass conditioning beyond the "herd mentality"?

... or is it pure incompetence to face 100s of contractions of the status quo (powers that be) and rather follow the "Alpha Male of the Wolf Pack" psychology almost like we have a "obedience-gene" within our DNA embedded ... and exceptions are treated like "anomalies" & "weird" meanwhile the whole society goes insane calling you mad for seeing exactly that.

When a corrupted system is normalizing insanity & legalizing unconstitutional actions it will eventually affect you and (y)our children, friends & family. When that is happening it is probably too late ... People warning about this for decades but were laughed & (skillfully) ridiculed so much so that most do not feel the need to consider any of it ... and even if you did consider it, you still face the mass psychology techniques including help from A.I. Algorithms they bombard you 24/7 on multiple levels!

In short: they (NYT) falsely assume you are not "qualified" enough to think critical about any (highly) controversial issue and demand that you let them decide how to interpreted "reality".

I call them the: "Corrupt Authoritative Perception Managers" serving Dystopian Agenda 2030 Nightmare.

There is so so much more to talk about this ... but I will stop here for now.

• Please tell everybody to use/share this "tinyurl" research link: ⚠️ tinyurl.com/TheGreatReset (Dystopian AI Driven Agenda 2030 Nightmare!) do not only rely on Corporate MSM like NYT mass conditioning & framing.

Cheers,
John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
November 20, 2020

[ExomatrixTV]

Tucker Carlson: The elites want COVID-19 lockdowns to usher in a 'Great Reset' and that should terrify you.

• I can not embed this video from lbry sorry ... would also be cool if we could embed videos from brandnewtube

[ExomatrixTV]

The Next Crisis?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cp190eDFltU

[Tintin]

This article repeats many of the narratives of other good articles discussing the "Reset" but where it differs is in homing in on Article 29 of the UDHR - Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Magna Carta.

The Declaration - 1948

Due to its length I'm posting critical passages and links only here. In my view it is one of the best articles yet that I've seen that pulls together this angle and where there is subjective commentary, in places, remains thought provoking.

_______________________________


The Great Reset abolishes the US Constitution & English Bill of Rights
Author: Philip Ridley
Topic: Great Reset
Date: 14th November 2020

Source: Weston A. Price - London

The Great Reset claims to replace Capitalism with Stakeholder Capitalism, which is the over-riding of national sovereignty by United Nations global governance, for and by their state, corporate and NGO partners, who are the sole Stakeholders of Stakeholder Capitalism.

The Great Reset is also a marketing strategy and propaganda decoy that aims to sanitise, re-package, re-market and distract from the real agenda, which is to implement the world order that was set out in Article 29 of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of “Human Rights”, (UDHR) back in 1948. The Great Reset did not come from nowhere as discussed by Antony P Mueller of the Mises Institute.

Articles 1 to 28 of the Declaration provide positive rights that appear beneficial on the surface and that gave hope, particularly for countries that never had a constitution or bill of rights. However, any pretence of altruism is blown out of the water by Article 29.

UDHR Article 29(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

UDHR Article 29(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

These two articles place the positive individual rights described in Articles 1 to 28 into context with a “community” that they declare we must live within or else be anti-socialist outlaws without rights. This ensures that individual rights will ultimately be over-ridden by the tyranny of the majority and the powerful when they become an irritation. In this case the Community is the United Nations and its State, Corporate & NGO Partners. You must comply with but have no control over the UN’s Stakeholder Community.

UDHR Article 29(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

The kicker is Article 29(3), which authorises the UN to suspend or remove ANY right or freedom and presumably due process of law that is contrary to their purposes and principles, which could of course change with the wind, with no mechanisms in place of any kind to check that power, they can simply do with you what they like, when they like.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Article 4. 1. “In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the na tion (sic) and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, the States Parties to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with their other obligations under international law and do not involve discrimination solely on the ground of race, colour, sex, language, religion or social origin.”

Article 29 was expanded upon by ICCPR, Article 4, which came into force on 23 March 1976, around about the time that the English Constitution was removed from schools, Bar exams for Solicitors and training for Police Constables. This pretended to extend the UN tyranny franchise of Article 29(3) to nation states, providing them opportunity to suspend any right or freedom simply by declaring an emergency, so long as that state of emergency is in tune with the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

This is why we hear for example about the Climate Emergency. Whenever you hear this terminology, know that the corporate “stakeholder” community is defining new boundaries beyond which you have no human rights. Breach your carbon quota or exit your coronavirus bubble and you become outlawed.

Comparison with the English and United States Constitutions

The Angles, Saxons and Jutes were first unified 12th July 927 by King Alfred the Great, making England the world’s oldest country in existence today, hence the unique importance of English law that forms the basis of US Law and all other Common Law Jurisdictions that are founded upon individual liberty and due process of law, two things that the United Nations seek to arbitrarily abolish with Article 29(3) of their Charter.

The most important first step towards our modern Common Law system was the Assize of Clarendon (1166), This law was a re-issuance of ancient rights and customs during the reign of King Henry II that established for the first time a national Common Law system of courts with Habeas corpus and trial by juries empowered to strike out judgements and laws that are unjust through Jury Nullification and rulings by judges, with court decisions forming precedents that allow for adaptation to changing circumstances. It is not uncommon for Parliament to reform or repeal laws in response to court judgements.

This dynamic system, separation of powers and empowerment of the common man allows for feedback to the governors from the governed to deliver a relatively organic, adaptive and stable system. Common Law is the opposite of the top down administrative legal system of the United Nations that reflects the Napoleonic Code and Roman law of continental Europe. The last court of assize was quietly replaced by Crown Courts in England and Wales in 1972 just prior to adoption of the ICCPR and the UK joining the administrative European Union that lacks Common Law.

The other contrast is that in a Common Law jurisdiction you can do anything that is not prohibited by law, whereas under administrative law you can only do that which is expressly authorised, hence the voluminous nature of EU laws and UN policies and treaties.

Magna Carta (1215)

Chapter 39 “No free man shall be seized, imprisoned, dispossessed, outlawed, exiled or ruined in any way, nor in any way proceeded against, except by the lawful judgement of his peers and the law of the land.”

Chapter 40 “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or justice.”

The Magna Carta of 1215 is the most famous attempt to codify some of the principles of the Common Law and the first known law to have asserted that a King, at that time King John, is not above the law. The UN is therefore certainly not above the law in any Common Law jurisdiction. It included Clauses 39 and 40 that guaranteed forever, liberty, justice and due process of law that Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights pretends to abolish.

Magna Carta (1297)

The 1215 Magna Carta was a treaty between the Barons and the King. It was subsequently re-issued into Statute law in 1297 by King Edward I, proclaiming in the introductory text, which remains the law of the land, that:

“these Liberties following, to be kept in our Kingdom of England for ever.”

And in Article 1 that “We have granted also, and given to all the Freemen of our Realm, for Us and our Heirs for ever, these Liberties under-written, to have and to hold to them and their Heirs, of Us and our Heirs for ever.”

Magna Carta (1297) Article 29 (XXIX) “Imprisonment, &c. contrary to Law. Administration of Justice.” states that: “NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor deal with him [condemn him,] but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.”


Chapter 29 (XXIX) of the Magna Carta is the most important law still in force in the UK and possibly the world. The United Nations will have been painfully aware of this when they passed their Universal Declaration of “Human Rights” in 1948 that seeks to abolish the Common Law when it suits them. Is this why the Article that pretends to abolish Chapter 29 of the Magna Carta is Article 29 of the Universal Declaration? If so, this is an indication that the UN Charter and therefore the “Great” Reset is a declaration of war upon all Common Law jurisdictions including the Constitution of the United States of America, which embodies the spirit of Article 29 of the Magna Carta (1297).

Article 29 of the Magna Carta (1297) remains the law of the land in the United Kingdom and Crown Dependencies and its principles remain the foundation of all common law countries. It was confirmed to be retained in the Republic of Ireland by the Statute Revision Act (2007) and the whole of Ireland also has its own Magna Carta Hiberniae (1216). It arguably remains law in Canada and Australia and remains on the statute book in New Zealand. The United States Constitution is in compliance with Chapter 29 of the Magna Carta.

The road was not always smooth and grievances still occurred with various attempts subsequently made to reinforce and codify the liberties of Subjects. For example, the Liberty of Subjects Act (1354) and Observance of Due Process Act (1368) signed into law by King Edward III, both of which remain law in the UK today. They further reinforce protection of general liberties and due process. In particular, and relevant to Article 29 of the UN Declaration and all UN treaties that pretend to be able to suspend liberty and due process, the 1368 Observance of Due Process Act made Constitutional the ancient Saxon custom, that:

“if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary (of due process of law), it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error”.

Therefore, any treaty, enacted or imposed upon a Common Law jurisdiction, certainly in the UK, that pretends to be able to suspend due process of law can be deemed null and void, not only henceforth but also retroactively. This is an unfamiliar principle for many places that are not Common Law jurisdictions and helps explain the hatred that is often expressed towards the Anglo Saxon customs, laws and people. Therefore those UN treaties that suspend our rights and due process of law are “void in the law” and should be “holden for Error”.

England did suffer a Civil War following tyrannous Stuart rule that saw the Petition of Rights (1627) with King Charles loosing his head in 1649. Finally, the Glorious English Revolution, England produced the jewel in its the crown, the English Bill of Rights (1688), which established today’s Parliamentary Democracy and Constitutional Monarchy that remains in full force to this day. Its clauses are similar to the first eight amendments of the United States Constitution.

Many of the Bill of Rights Articles have been contravened by the Coronavirus Regulations including:

- Articles 1 & 2 with the imposition and suspension of laws by decree, which also contravenes Chapter IV the constitutional Act of Settlement 1701.
- Article 3 of the Bill of Rights and Chapter 1 Magna Carta (1297) regarding the unlawful state regulation and suspension of church activities.
- Article 5 regarding commitments and prosecutions for political speech, protest, assembly and limitations on freedom of the Press. “That it is the Right of the Subjects to petition the King and all Commitments and Prosecutions for such Petitioning are Illegall.”
- Article 6 regarding deployment of the military domestically both on streets in in cyberspace without an Act of Parliament. “That the raising or keeping a standing Army within the Kingdome in time of Peace unlesse it be with Consent of Parlyament is against Law.”
- Article 9, by pretending that the majority of MPs could pass a law that suspended the individual right of all MPs to scrutinise and vote on new restrictions on behalf of their Constituents. “That the Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached,, “
- Articles 10 “That excessive Baile ought not to be required nor excessive Fines imposed nor cruell and unusuall Punishments inflicted.” & 12 “That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegall and void.” by the promise of excessive fines and forfeitures before conviction including £10,000 fines with no means test or method of appeal for opening “non-essential” businesses or for organising “unauthorised” political rallies that should be protected by Article 5.
- Article 11 by suspending certain Jury trials. “That Jurors ought to be duely impannelled and returned”
- Article 13 by causing infrequent six monthly Parliamentary scrutiny of Coronavirus regulations. “And that for Redresse of all Grievances and for the amending strengthening and preserveing of the Lawes Parlyaments ought to be held frequently.”

Whilst Article 29 of the Magna Carta speaks of rights in general terms, the Petition of Rights and English Bill of Rights described and made constitutional specific rights as does the United States Constitution, all of which merely elaborate upon the general principles of liberty expressed by Article 29 of the Magna Carta (1297). The English Bill of Rights remains constitutional law in the UK and Scotland was offered by England its own version, the Claim of Rights (1689). The English Bill of Rights was also retained in the Republic of Ireland by the Statute Revision Act (2007) with three minor sections, those deemed discriminatory against Catholics, being repealed as a result of them being deemed repugnant to the Republic.

The English Bill of Rights is often referred to as the Bill of Rights abroad, it remains in statute with constitutional status in Canada, Australia and also New Zealand, which recently bolstered its liberties with the New Zealand Bill of Rights (1990), that amongst other things prohibits forced medical procedures and medical experimentation, which has occurred writ large with lockdown.

Article 29(3) of the Universal Declaration of “Human Rights is the specific clause that plunges a knife into the Magna Carta, English Bill of Rights and United States Constitution by declaring in hostile terms that “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” It may not surprise you therefore that when you divide 29 by 3 you get 9.666 reoccurring.

Whether planned or by coincidence, finding the number of the beast in this clause is appropriate because infamous Satanist, Aleister Crowley, proclaimed “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.” and so it has come to pass that Article 29(3) allows the United Nations to do as it wishes with this being the whole of the law. With the number 9 also featuring in that equation, I reviewed Revelations 9 and couldn’t help but come to the conclusion that such a law would inevitably bring forth the dystopia it describes.

Most politicians and public officials are guilty of committing fraud and malfeasance in office when they read from a script a false lockdown narrative with them imposing unappraised measures handed down by the World Health Organisation.

This renders them all vulnerable to private prosecution, no public official is above the law, except if you run the UN or WHO. Further, any imposition of United Nations treaties that suspend liberty and due process of law within a Common Law jurisdiction is void and in error and those who seek to suspend the common law and constitution are committing sedition or treason, given that the Great Reset seeks to overthrow our ancient, inviolable, unalienable customs, liberties, laws and constitutions. The Treason Act (1351) of King Edward II remains in force in the UK. It states amongst other things that:

“if a Man do levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm, or be adherent to the King’s Enemies in his Realm, giving to them Aid and Comfort in the Realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be proveably attainted of open Deed by People of their Condition,, And it is to be understood, that in the Cases above rehearsed, it ought to be judged Treason which extends to our Lord the King, and his Royal Majesty”

In the USA the President swears an Oath to defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Similarly in the UK, the Monarch swears a Coronation Oath from the Coronation Oath Act (1688), that applies also to Canada, Australia and New Zealand, in which they, on behalf of themselves and their governments “solemnely Promise and Sweare to Governe the People of this Kingdome of England and the Dominions thereto belonging according to the Statutes in Parlyament Agreed on and the Laws and Customs of the same.”

The English Bill of Rights goes further, making it unconstitutional for the UK to be ruled by a foreign power, which places a cloud over our previous membership of the European Union, it states:

“I doe declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God.”

___________________________

Other related/cited: Antony P. Mueller for Mises Institute November 18th 2020:
https://mises.org/wire/united-nation...ns-great-reset

[Patient]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
The Next Crisis?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cp190eDFltU

As crazy as some of this does sound, the internet allows people to "communicate freely" which is something that is always in the way of those who want to control everyone.

But people will always find a way to circumvent absolute control.

[pueblo]

No surprise that Ursula and the EU are on board the Great Reset train..

[vizon]

I'm just dropping by this thread to say...

**** the Global Reset.

I won't be enslaved any further. Enough is enough.

Don't forget, if the elite ruling class really truly gave a **** about our health then they would be advocating preventative care to fight off the COVID-19 virus (vitamin D, C and Zinc are a great start).

They're not.

The world is quickly transforming into a giant corporation. How this doesn't terrify the masses really has me *quite* concerned.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Let's not let them escape through the use of ambiguous phraseology.

This is the rollout of THE NEW WORLD ORDER, as first espoused by George Bush, Sr.

Just like Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin, The Cuban Missile Crisis, 9/11, and now the China Virus...all are calculated and implemented enemy tactics to bring about sweeping changes, that otherwise would not have been accepted by the American people, to leapfrog ahead the mission to bring about The New World Order.

How do they wish to do it? As always, ordo ab chao, order out of the chaos they introduce. And what order? The New World Order!

The great reset be damned.

[kfm27917]

These days I express a number of my opinions as :interesting". This means that given the contrasts in the existing "data" (vs. "information") new data forces me to consider and weigh everything
(within my values and paradigms)

Attached are 3 "interesting" articles on the web for YOUR consideration

https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...ildren-of-men/

https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...-to-walk-away/

https://www.strategic-culture.org/ne...cial-contract/

[Delight]

I like listening to the Highwire as it always shows the sources of information and I can count on the presentations being as objective as possible.

The end game is way beyond a forced vax.
Watch here from 1:03:00

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1yNGaWoRpaExj

[Deborah (ahamkara)]

“Equality is not such a great thing if we are all made equally poor!”😄😄

[ExomatrixTV]

The Great Reset - Dystopian AI Driven Agenda 2030 Nightmare!


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/M6lAJaxcLTkF

• ~original title: "The Great Reset Dystopian Sci-Fi Short Film"

Track and Trace:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OGGczyk9BL8

Police State:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zSi0dAwYKos

Mandatory Vaccine:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lP8yTtptW5M

Masked Agenda:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=R3qzxe2zTug