Time to move on.

[chelmostef]

But this always happens and this is why posts get moved around this happens a lot, No?

Off topic posts being moved... This was once a big thing to if I remember rightly.

Not just Charles related but with other stuff too.

Just Charles has peeped peoples interest... Not necessarily a bad thing, just a way of learning.

[sjkted]

But this always happens and this is why posts get moved around this happens a lot, No?

Off topic posts being moved... This was once a big thing to if I remember rightly.

Not just Charles but with other stuff too.

There were once standards here. This did happen from time to time. But, this is happening en masse now because the mods are letting people get away with it and people are taking their own liberties to say whatever they want wherever they want...

--sjkted

[chelmostef]

Posted by sjkted (here)

There were once standards here. This did happen from time to time. But, this is happening en masse now because the mods are letting people get away with it and people are taking their own liberties to say whatever they want wherever they want...

--sjkted

You have a valid point, but the subject matter(This being about Charles) is irrelevant. People should follow the simple rule of stay on topic. Which we haven't, paradox hey!

[SKAWF]

i wanted to put a video here. didnt work out too well.

heres something to fill in the time.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=p-wmbM6EpZU

[ponda]

Re moving on.

Interesting that the recent Atticus poll favored that Atticus should stay but reveal all of the info and now we find that he is leaving.One might assume that he doesn't want to reveal all of the info.

[chelmostef]

Posted by ponda (here)
Re moving on.

Interesting that the recent Atticus poll favored that Atticus should stay but reveal all of the info and now we find that he is leaving.One might assume that he doesn't want to reveal all of the info.

One can assume many things but doesn't mean it is fact.(off topic again, sorry)

[sjkted]

You have a valid point, but the subject matter(This being about Charles) is irrelevant. People should follow the simple rule of stay on topic. Which we haven't, paradox hey!

Agreed 100%. It's not about Charles, it's about being OT.

--sjkted

[modwiz]

Posted by ponda (here)
Re moving on.

Interesting that the recent Atticus poll favored that Atticus should stay but reveal all of the info and now we find that he is leaving.One might assume that he doesn't want to reveal all of the info.

Considering his post here, it would seem he has had enough with being called divisive. You'd think he was paying people here the way some act.

He can't win here. It is a set up by the hecklers and jeerers. The person on stage doesn't put hecklers in the audience. People who want to stop the performance are the ones behind the heckling. It is absurd and intellectually dishonest to suggest anything else.

[modwiz]

Posted by sjkted (here)
I have a question for the mods:

We have a longstanding member who is announcing his intentions to depart the forum, and then suddenly it becomes the Charles thread with "please don't leave Charles".

Where are you guys when a thread goes seriously O/T? As I remember, mods were quite active on this sort of thing prior to that auspicious date of 1/1/11.

--sjkted

As soon as a person who is leaving posts their good bye. It is over. The OP has left the building.

The thread has been abandoned. What topic?

He's leaving...............He left........... All done!

So now it's open mike on comedy night.

[ponda]

Posted by modwiz (here)

Posted by ponda (here)
Re moving on.

Interesting that the recent Atticus poll favored that Atticus should stay but reveal all of the info and now we find that he is leaving.One might assume that he doesn't want to reveal all of the info.

Considering his post here, it would seem he has had enough with being called divisive. You'd think he was paying people here the way some act.

He can't win here. It is a set up by the hecklers and jeerers. The person on stage doesn't put hecklers in the audience. People who want to stop the performance are the ones behind the heckling. It is absurd and intellectually dishonest to suggest anything else.

Well you put yourself up on the stage and you have to take what comes.I wouldn't label people hecklers just because they view things differently.Balance of opinion is a good thing and i believe it was being put there with the intention of giving other people a balanced perspective.

I'm fairly sure that charles said that he himself was divisive.

Personally i hoped he would of hung around and gave out a bit more info and experiences.Some of it was interesting but life will go on regardless of what charles says or does.Good luck to him

[quench]

Posted by Atticus (here)
It's a solution to a few problems,slowing the sight down etc.
Also no big deal we can copy across threads etc.
And probably tidy up as we go,it's a suggestion think about it , it's inevitable anyway in the long run.

Please don't start any arguments about this it is meant to do the opposite.

Thank you

Bill/Atticus

Just yesterday I started going through all the RULERS OF THE WORLD threads, with the idea of condensing them a LOT. Going through each page and copying into a Word document all quotes posted by Bill, Atticus, and Girl Friday, and also all posts thanked by Atticus.

After going through 16 pages of the forum in the "Charles' comments about a False Flag ET threat event: important new information" thread (320 posts), there are just 9 pages in the Word document (21 posts). That's an idea of how much space and time it will save.

I was doing this for my own benefit, but if you would like to use them for a new private website or if they would be useful on this website then they're yours. Although, I'm only half through that first one at the moment because unfortunately have to go to work yesterday and today lol

So I will continue tomorrow. Let me know

[Humble Janitor]

Probably a stupid question, but is Atticus really "Charles"?

If so, weren't we required to ask someone else to ask him questions or can we ask him directly?

[The One]

ArtyCarl my Avalon friend

Things have changed ArtyCarl i have noticed that myself but your contribution to this forum is just as important as anybody else’s.Theres been a huge increase in members in the last month and i haven’t contributed to the forum like I usually do. I am sitting back for a while and just reading what other people have to say.


Just because everything is different doesn't mean anything has changed go as far as you can see; when you get there, you'll be able to see further

P.S Please dont make this a Charles thread

[Icecold]

Posted by chelmostef (here)
Perhaps this is about protecting whistle blowers from the flack of the forum. Not just Atticus but any whistle blower can be hurt by callous and hate full comments coming from members of Avalon... The dynamics of Avalon change not just from new members but old members too. We say we are kind all loving spirits but we seem to have trouble putting that in the comment sections. This is by no means all but enough to make a solid difference.

I would suggest that all whistle blowers have there very own section of the forum that is protected from the flack, petty name calling and belittling, that has been happening.

This section would be a read all basis and perhaps invite only... And hurtful, spiteful commenters will be down graded so that commenting for them would not be allowed in those sections. Also the whistle blower has the right to down grade anyone from their section as deemed necessarily. So it would be like a buffer zone between the forums.

As we have seen many times before whistle blowers leave because of the actions from a few. If we want to continue this way that is fine, but it will keep happening unless the mechanics of the forum change. Or we grow up and stop being nasty... Of course this is to late for the past whistle blowers they are just pages in the book of Avalon.

Perhaps in the new paradigm that we are all waiting for will be nice, kind and loving to each other.

Whistleblowers need to be vetted privately through Bill and be cleared for authenticity before they post on the forum in public. This also allows Bill to resume the interview format. The interviews can then be publicised for discussion by the forum via a thread. In that way, there will be no call to claim a fraud. Turning 'whistleblowers' loose on the forum with no credential checks invites scrutiny. After publication of a video and a general member discussion. 'Whistleblowers' can then safely interact with the forum.

[modwiz]

Posted by The One (here)
ArtyCarl my Avalon friend

Things have changed ArtyCarl i have noticed that myself but your contribution to this forum is just as important as anybody else’s.Theres been a huge increase in members in the last month and i haven’t contributed to the forum like I usually do. I am sitting back for a while and just reading what other people have to say.


Just because everything is different doesn't mean anything has changed go as far as you can see; when you get there, you'll be able to see further

P.S Please dont make this a Charles thread

You and Arty might want to do a reality check. In 21 collective months the two of you have managed 60 thank yous to other posters. 24 for Arty and 36 for yourself.
So it is apparent you have been unimpressed with the material here since you arrived. You have found little worthy of your praise in a little short of a years time here.

So, whatever has changed here it hasn't been the penury of your appreciation.

You can PM each other with these imaginings of recent ennui because the history of your gratitude can be seen by all here. Oops!

See. It isn't a Charles thread.

Good night, Gracie.

[TimelessDimensions]

Like spiced ham, the Charles thing is probably just a fad.

Project Avalon is already starting to snap out of the hysteria so I'm sticking around :-)

[chelmostef]

Posted by Icecold (here)
Whistleblowers need to be vetted privately through Bill and be cleared for authenticity before they post on the forum in public. This also allows Bill to resume the interview format. The interviews can then be publicised for discussion by the forum via a thread. In that way, there will be no call to claim a fraud. Turning 'whistleblowers' loose on the forum with no credential checks invites scrutiny. After publication of a video and a general member discussion. 'Whistleblowers' can then safely interact with the forum.

And that is what happens... I'm saying if we stay on this format, the one you have described then we will continue the way we have done. And this is to loss all most every whistle blower coming to Avalon.... What I'm saying is we should offer them some protection, if they come giving information. Bunk disinfo what ever info they have, pitch forking people is not a good way to operate....

And if its not Bunk, disinfo, then its an even worse way to operate.

Or we can wait for the paradigm to change and people act in a more compassionate all loving way.

[Icecold]

MW have you ever thought of taking up gardening as a serious occupation?

[witchy1]

You and Arty might want to do a reality check. In 21 collective months the two of you have managed 60 thank yous to other posters. 24 for Arty and 36 for yourself.So it is apparent you have been unimpressed with the material here since you arrived. You have found little worthy of your praise in a little short of a years time here.

Hi Modwiz, I think this a little unfair IMHO. I imagine we have many people who dont post much or get the time to read through every post and digest it. It is a quantum leap in assumption that they are unimpressed with the material here. How could you know this?

Just because people take a back seat and are less visible than many others does not infer that they are not interested. People approach thing differently and we all have different amounts of time to spend in here. Just because they are not "thanking" people or posting much does not mean they are any less valued than any other member - does it?
W

[modwiz]

Posted by witchy1 (here)

You and Arty might want to do a reality check. In 21 collective months the two of you have managed 60 thank yous to other posters. 24 for Arty and 36 for yourself.So it is apparent you have been unimpressed with the material here since you arrived. You have found little worthy of your praise in a little short of a years time here.

Hi Modwiz, I think this a little unfair IMHO. I imagine we have many people who dont post much or get the time to read through every post and digest it. It is a quantum leap in assumption that they are unimpressed with the material here. How could you know this?

Just because people take a back seat and are less visible than many others does not infer that they are not interested. People approach thing differently and we all have different amounts of time to spend in here. Just because they are not "thanking" people or posting much does not mean they are any less valued than any other member - does it?
W

He was ruing a time before Charles when the forum supposedly was better. I found it not so well supported by his contributions. You have less than half the time here and have expressed yourself in a fashion that is 10 times greater.

Nobody should thank what they do not like. My point was that they found so little to like for a time disproportionately greater than the time Charles has been here.

Further, I was not speaking about their value. I was speaking of their perceived value fulfillment here since the arrival of Charles. The very point of the posters piece.

Thank you for making me reconsider my post.

I stand by it.