Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[Delight]

FYI

PRESS RELEASE: Doctors and Scientists Accuse Medical Regulator of Downplaying COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers
The European Medicines Agency is misleading citizens into medical experimentation, experts warn
Doctors for Covid Ethics
April 1st 2021

Doctors and scientists from 25 countries have today issued a rebuttal letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), following the regulator’s dismissal of their earlier warnings regarding COVID-19 vaccine dangers from clotting and bleeding.
Within days of the EMA receiving the group’s original letter on March 1st, outlining risks of blood disorders from COVID-19 vaccines, over a dozen countries suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine following deaths from clotting and bleeding, as the doctors had warned.
On March 23rd, however, the EMA dismissed the group’s concerns as relating to “minor” and “rare” events, concluding that “a positive benefit-risk balance has been established.”
The doctors and scientists have today hit back, accusing the EMA of misleading the public on the vaccines’ true risk-benefit profile. “Your reply of March 23 is unconvincing and unacceptable,” they wrote, noting that recorded cases of life-threatening cerebral venous thrombosis (CSVT) post-vaccination likely “represent just the tip of a huge iceberg”. Common reactions to vaccination, including headache, nausea, blurred vision and vomiting, they state, are symptoms of CSVT, and should be assessed as such, immediately.
Clotting and bleeding after vaccination can also “be expected to increase with each re-vaccination, and each intervening coronavirus exposure” the group warned. Over time “this renders both repeated vaccination and common coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom — in the absence of ‘vaccination’ — COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.
“Such is the real risk-benefit analysis of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’. Either the EMA lacks the subject-matter expertise to appreciate the molecular science of this reality, or it lacks the medical ethics to act accordingly.”
The group, Doctors for Covid Ethics, which includes professors of immunology and microbiology, described the EMA’s responses to their concerns as “unscientific”, “vague”, and lacking credibility. They have offered to liaise with the agency to mitigate against vaccination risks and ethics violations, including helping the EMA to “craft a focussed pharmacovigilance plan.”
The group warned that continuing to administer inadequately tested gene-based COVID-19 vaccines represents dangerous medical experimentation, whose “true risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits”, reflecting “serious violations of medical ethics and citizens’ medical rights.”
“Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, or coercing them through ‘vaccine passports’, constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code”, they caution.
The letter is addressed to Emer Cooke, Executive Director of the EMA, and was copied to the lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission.
Link to Doctors for Covid Ethics rebuttal letter to EMA (April 1st): https://doctors4covidethics.medium.c...21-7d867f0121e
Link to EMA letter to Doctors for Covid Ethics (March 23rd): https://doctors4covidethics.medium.c...1-d6760984dd06
Doctors for Covid Ethics is a group of over 100 doctors and scientists from 25 countries.
Web: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drs4CovidEthics
For comment contact Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD: sucharit.bhakdi@gmx.de, or Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD:mpalmer@uwaterloo.ca
Further resources
Original Doctors for Covid Ethics letter to EMA (Delivered March 1st): https://doctors4covidethics.medium.c...9-f6e17c311595
Video statement (March 11th)by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene: https://lbry.tv/@Doctors4CovidEthics...n-letter.ENG:0
Doctors, scientists, lawyers and colleagues in allied disciplines can sign the open letter by sending their name, qualifications, areas of expertise and country of practice to:Doctors4CovidEthics@protonmail.com, with web verification (eg workplace or registration link, not for publication).
END

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/mCSY4HDAPXc5/



Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/v43hnKwgQQZX/

[ExomatrixTV]

• Dr. Ryan Cole - Covid Mistakes

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/hfzL5gUeQvxr

[uzn]

Well spoken Andrew Lawrence


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YQuVvrmaCcpM

[uzn]

Canada

A Polish head of a church in Canada kicks out members of armed uniformed thugs for the regime of Elizabeth the 2nd calling them Gestapo, Nazis, and Communists

The video filmed by the angry priest shows members of the so-called Canadian 'Royal' police being shown the door by him after they desecrated the 'Passover, the holiest Christian holiday' in his words.

The Gestapo members left as they didn't have a warrant in the first place.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/48ULp6vKJYg2

[uzn]

“Achieving behaviour change”

A guide for national government.



download:
https://assets.publishing.service.go...Government.pdf

[ExomatrixTV]

• Emergency Sunday Broadcast: Globalist Smoking-Gun Document Confirms Vaccine Causes Permanent Brain Damage

Alex Jones breaks down the SPARS 2025-2028 documents that lay out how the globalists will launch a second more severe pandemic to consolidate final power into their world government project, with an even deadlier vaccine in the works to “stop” the crisis they created. PDF

[ExomatrixTV]

source

• Dramatic video shows police shut down Easter church service and threaten worshippers with fines for breaking COVID-19 rules

[Delight]

The ugly truth about the Covid-19 lockdowns - Nick Hudson, co-founder of PANDA
In this short 30 minute video, you will hear clearly, simply, and precisely where we went wrong with our #COVID19 response, and why it is so important we stop and reassess our actions and policies.
Democracy and individual human rights are dying. Not at the hands of politicians, but of unelected medical bureaucrats the world over.
Tag your friends, share this powerful video, and join the resistance at No More Lockdowns Canada.
#ONPoli #CDNPoli #NoMoreLockdowns #WeAreLivingALie #WeMustResist
this video on these platforms as well:
https://vimeo.com/532172876
https://odysee.com/@PANDA/TimeToReopenSociety

Source: Watch on Vimeo

[Icare]

Thanks, Greybeard, for uploading the clip with Dr Coleman explaining why this is his last video.

I understand why he can't take the abuse he has been getting for speaking out.

This is really sad, I have a lot of respect for Dr. Coleman.

[greybeard]

Prof Dolores Cahill: "mRNA Vaccine will Kill People in their 70s in Two to Three Years"


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/HsXYbU76OtpS

[greybeard]

Global Medical & Scientific Experts Call Upon World Governments to Act Now to Save Lives

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ypxrJhSg5xU

[greybeard]

COVID-19: an overview of the evidence
March 18, 2021


https://www.hartgroup.org/covid-19-evidence/
The data is in: lockdowns serve no useful purpose and cause catastrophic societal and economic harms. They must never be repeated in this country.

The ‘sunk cost fallacy’ is a well known one. World War 1 is the classic example. By Christmas 1914 it was obvious to all that the war was a catastrophe, but to admit this was to admit that all the lives lost had been lost pointlessly. And no country would confess that.

However, after a year of pain, suffering and enormous loss, the UK must reach for new solutions to the COVID-19 problem and any future respiratory disease outbreaks. We must learn from errors, acknowledge the harms of the measures we have taken and account for them moving forward. We now need a more holistic, measured approach.

Many international studies bear out that lockdowns have proven to be a complete failure as a public health measure to contain a respiratory virus. They did not succeed in their primary objective of containing spread yet have caused great harm.

Lockdowns were explicitly not recommended even for severe respiratory viral outbreaks in all pandemic planning prior to 2020, including those endorsed by the WHO and the Department of Health. The reasons for ignoring existing policies and adopting unprecedented measures appear to have been (i) panic whipped up by the media (especially scenes from China), (ii) a reluctance to do things differently to neighbouring countries and (iii) the unfaltering belief in one single mathematical model, which latterly turned out to be wildly inaccurate (Imperial College, Neil Ferguson).

We must find the courage to do things differently and to admit mistakes. The USA is leading the charge here, with more and more states turning their backs on lockdowns and mask mandates.

Moving forward, we would recommend the following steps:

Reinstate the existing pandemic planning policies from 2019, pending a detailed review of the policies adopted in 2020. Look to countries and states which did things differently. There should be a clear commitment from the Government that we will never again lockdown.
Stop mass testing healthy people. Return to the principles of respiratory disease diagnosis (the requirement of symptoms) that were well researched and accepted before 2020. Manufacturers’ guidelines state that these tests are designed to assist the diagnosis of symptomatic patients, not to ‘find’ disease in otherwise healthy people.
Stop all mask mandates. They are psychologically and potentially physically harmful whilst being clinically unproven to stop disease spread in the community and may themselves be a transmission risk.
Vaccination. Abandon the notion that vaccine certification is desirable and that children should be vaccinated. There is no logical or ethical argument for either.
Devise a public education programme to help redress the severe distortions in beliefs around disease transmission, likelihood of dying and possible treatment options. A messaging style based on a calm presentation of facts is urgently needed.
A full public enquiry into the extent to which severe/fatal COVID-19 is spread in hospitals and care homes. There is stark recent evidence on this from Public Health Scotland and if true for the rest of the UK, there needs to be better segregation of COVID-19 patients and staff within these settings.
More funding and investigation of treatments for COVID-19, instead of only focusing on vaccination as a strategy. Given the high rates of hospital transmission, encourage a drive for more early treatment-at-home using some of the protocols discussed herein.
Divert funds. The not inconsiderable money saved from ceasing testing programmes can be diverted to much needed areas, such as mental health, treatment research and an increase in hospital capacity and staffing. The vast debts accrued during 2020 will also need to be paid off, a fact that seems to be worryingly absent from economic recovery plans.

Read our full review of the evidence here >

Our group of scientists, medics and public health experts have put together this rigorously and widely researched document. Topics included are:

COVID policies and harm to children – Professor Ellen Townsend; Dr Karen Neil
COVID-19 vaccination in children – major ethical concerns – Dr Ros Jones
Vaccine passports – an ethical minefield – Dr Malcolm Kendrick
Asymptomatic spread – who can really spread COVID-19? Dr John Lee
Economic impacts – the true cost of lockdowns – Professor David Paton; Professor Marilyn James
Mutant strains and the futility of border closures – Dr Gerry Quinn
‘Zero Covid’ – an impossible dream- Professor David Livermore
Masks – do the benefits outweigh the harms? – Dr Gary Sidley
Psychological impact of the Government’s communication style and restrictive measures – Dr Damian Wilde
Lockdowns – do they work? – Professor Marilyn James
Mortality data & COVID-19 – Joel Smalley
The ONS Infection Survey: a reevaluation of the data – Dr Clare Craig; Dr Paul Cuddon
Promising treatment options – Dr Ros Jones; Dr Edmund Fordham
Care homes – we must do better for the most vulnerable in society – Dr Ali Haggett
Ethical considerations of the COVID-19 response – Professor David Seedhouse

Please follow and like us:
Facebook
Twitter
Post navigation
COVID-19 vaccination in children – major ethical concerns
Vaccine certification – an ethical minefield

[Valle]

Thanks! - a very hopeful discussion about Ivermectin.

Posted by greybeard (here)
Global Medical & Scientific Experts Call Upon World Governments to Act Now to Save Lives

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ypxrJhSg5xU

[TravelerJim]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Emergency Sunday Broadcast: Globalist Smoking-Gun Document Confirms Vaccine Causes Permanent Brain Damage

Alex Jones breaks down the SPARS 2025-2028 documents that lay out how the globalists will launch a second more severe pandemic to consolidate final power into their world government project, with an even deadlier vaccine in the works to “stop” the crisis they created. PDF

Ok, it's true that you have to listen to Alex Jones but I am listening to this and it seems to be a show on old documents from a few years back. The plans are all in place for what is now happening. Amazing.

[Delight]

The numbers of post vaccine injuries are not being reported accurately.

ICAN, through its attorneys, has once again written to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the new Director of the CDC, this time to demand an answer as to why the CDC’s reporting of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination is not in line with a clinical study conducted which shows much higher rates following these vaccinations.

The CDC tells the public that “Anaphylaxis after COVID-19 vaccination is rare and occurred in approximately 2 to 5 people per million vaccinated in the United States based on events reported to VAERS.” However, ICAN reviewed a recent study at Mass General Brigham that assessed anaphylaxis in a clinical setting after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. This study, in stark contrast to the CDC’s claim, found “severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations.” This is equivalent to 50 times to 120 times more cases than what VAERS and the CDC are reporting!

In a letter to Dr. Walensky, ICAN explained that this alarming underreporting of anaphylaxis by the CDC and VAERS is particularly troubling because it is mandatory for medical providers to report anaphylaxis after any COVID-19 vaccine to VAERS. In addition, the CDC reports that most of these reactions occur within 30 minutes of vaccination. The study reported that the mean time to reaction is 17 minutes post-vaccination. This means that vaccine administrators, then, should be aware of a majority, if not all, of these cases as vaccine recipients are supposed to be observed for 15 to 30-minute periods following vaccination at all vaccination sites.

Additionally, and specifically with regard to COVID-19 vaccines, there has actually been a push by health authorities to inform medical providers that they need to report anaphylaxis to VAERS. Despite this, the rate of reporting still appears to be only around 0.8 to 2 percent of all cases of anaphylaxis. (This is close to the Harvard Pilgrim study which found that approximately 1% of adverse events are reported to VAERS).

ICAN explained to Dr. Walensky that this raises serious concerns regarding (i) under-reporting of other serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, and (2) adverse events following other vaccines for which there has not been the same push to report adverse events. The anaphylaxis study highlights the urgency of the ongoing, well-known problem with adverse event reporting post-vaccination which ICAN has been pointing out for years.

Unless and until this is addressed, underreporting to VAERS, a passive signal detection system, will continue to blind health agencies, medical professionals, and patients from what is really occurring in the clinic and will render true informed consent impossible.

ICAN continues to ask the hard questions of Dr. Walensky and others. ICAN will closely review any response from Dr. Walensky and will continue to push for improved transparency regarding vaccines and their development, clinical trials, and safety surveillance.

Geert Vanden Bossche (DVM, PhD)
Critical unresolved questions re: population dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness and host immunity

Critical unresolved questions re: population dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infectiousness and host immunity

The following critical but unresolved questions are an attempt to outline an urgent open scientific debate with expert scientists in virology, vaccinology and immunology, preferably in a joined constructive effort to find a way out of the ongoing world crisis.

More infectious variants

• How to explain the sudden emergence of several, more infectious variants (e.g., UK, South-African, Brazilian variants) in QIV 2020 (i.e., prior to the roll-out of mass vaccination campaigns and despite relatively low infection rates)?

• Will highly infectious variants persist in the human population? (How) can these variants be controlled?

• What is the likelihood for mutations rendering these variants less infectious and/or less virulent (cfr. ‘common cold’) to be selected? What would be the likelihood for such less infectious variants to adapt to the human population?

Innate immunity

• What is the contribution of variant-nonspecific innate immunity to anti-Covid-19 immune defense?

• Can spike(S)-specific antibodies (Abs) outcompete multimeric, variant-nonspecific sIgMs for binding to S protein? If so, can S-specific Abs interfere with natural Abs even if unable to neutralize the virus?

Asymptomatic infection

• How to explain the increase in cases of severe Covid-19 disease in younger (< 60 years), previously protected, age groups as currently observed in several countries?

• What is the role of short-lived anti-S Ab titers in a subset of asymptomatically infected subjects? Are those protective or do they interfere with the host’s innate immunity?

• Which immune mechanisms prevent Sars-CoV-2 infections from causing (severe) symptoms in the vast majority of the population?

• Which mechanisms are responsible for rapid viral clearance in asymptomatically infected subjects?

• To what extent do young healthy people contribute to the emergence of new variants?

Ongoing mass vaccination campaigns

• What is the likelihood that ongoing mass vaccination campaigns will provide herd immunity?

• Which objective criteria could be considered reliable indicators of potential selective immune escape of Sars-CoV-2? How to investigate whether or not a correlation exists between these criteria and external influences such as those brought about by pharmaceutical or nonpharmaceutical interventions?

Miscellaneous

• What is our current understanding of the mechanism causing ‘common cold’ coronaviruses to provide short-lived protection against Covid-19 disease?

• How can we explain re-infection with Sars-CoV-2 to occur in the presence of neutralizing Abs

• What is the role of CD8+ T cells in immune protection against Covid-19?

[greybeard]

'Tyranny is a Habit!'' - Sir Desmond Swayne OBLITERATES Labour and Conservatives for Covid-19 Act

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=L2N6XBnm0_M

[ExomatrixTV]

⚠️ 3 steps pushed forward by the C0VlD Tyranny Agenda2030 'The Great Dystopian Reset' ... after various protest demonstrations: 1 step back then 2 steps forward ... after criticism in their own parties: 1 step back then 3 steps again forward again ... after a few public blunders or scandals: 2 steps back, then ... etc. etc. etc. NETTO they know that they will eventually achieve their goals. ... Most is PURE THEATER.

Have several (practical & non-violent) ideas on how to turn the tide ... soon I will start brainstorming with like-minded people ... "Outsmart Defeatism, Going Beyond The Mass Conditioning" is my credo.

Cheers,

John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
April 6, 2021 🦜🦋🌳

[pueblo]

Link established between the Astrazeneca vaxx and blood clots, cause is still (conveniently) unknown.

[Delight]

Posted by pueblo (here)
Link established between the Astrazeneca vaxx and blood clots, cause is still (conveniently) unknown.

Neil Ferguson weighs in....

and this clear explicit statement is chilling

and the rest of the interview from 4/5/2021

[ExomatrixTV]

• “The Vaccine Is Killing Me!” Facebook Fact-Checks Woman’s Post About Covid Vaccine Adverse Reaction… She died a week later!
•