Vaccination Injuries On Record for Covid19

[ExomatrixTV]

• Lets say, we have 1000+ unique source links worldwide reporting vaccine injuries of all kinds (including deaths!) ... to be found here in this Project Avalon forum thread ... How much (percent) are "mainstream media" discussing vaccine injuries vs "alternative media >>> citing mainstream peer reviewed science sources discussing vaccine injuries" >>> most big media willfully ignores? ... Anyone? ... And what can we learn from this?
  

He/she who ask the wrong questions has a slim chance to get the right answers/insights ... So it is not about time to start asking much better questions?

Disclaimer: "peer reviewed" is NO guarantee it is 100% free from corruption/fraud ... same for any other source we use ... But it is reverse psychology to show how corrupt MSM has become ... Willfully ignoring their own mainstream science publications then calling us "fake news" for pointing that out.

cheers,
John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
December 6th, 2021

[ExomatrixTV]

• Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency

An American club of journalists and academics that wants to make public all scientific data of the approved COVID-19 'vaccines'.

On September 16, 2021, a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit was filed by PHMPT against the FDA to get the documents of Pfizer's gene therapeutic drug public.

• The first pieces have been released.

But the FDA only wants to hand over 500 pages a month, because it is 'too much work' - painting texts and such - to get everything out in one go.
Result : in 55 years everyone will have all the pieces!

Legal battles and the United States. Everything remains special. But in this case, the outcomes of this legal conflict matter to everyone in the world.
Let's take a look at the Pfizer documents that have now been released.

I take up the document with the fascinating title 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021.

On December 11, 2020 , the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer mRNA gene therapeutic. The above document therefore covers about two and a half months after the first marketing of the mRNA product. Hereby table 1:
Before we can understand the numbers above, according to Pfizer , the following conditions apply (emphasis added):

“Pfizer's safety database contains cases of AEs reported spontaneously to Pfizer , cases reported by the health authorities, cases published in the medical literature, cases from Pfizer-sponsored marketing programs, non-interventional studies, and cases of serious AEs reported from clinical studies regardless or causality assessment.” (p. 5)

“An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug ; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication .” (p. 6)

This is offset by the following warning, which has consequences for the numbers of reported side effects:

“Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown.” (p. 5)

It is therefore certain that the total number of reported 'adverse effect cases' in the first 2 1/2 months - 42086 - is lower than the actual number ; we'll never know how many there really are.

• Back to Table 1:

Remarkably, reported side effects are observed 3 times more in women than in men. In addition, by far the most side effects are related to the nervous system - 25957.
What really stands out is the number of fatal outcomes after the mRNA shot: 1,223 deaths .

This requires a comparison with the number of mRNA pricks set. Tellingly, those have been brushed off from the Pfizer documentation.
A simple benefit-cost comparison is therefore made impossible.

Let me therefore go back to the previously used study by Kemper et al. from 2002 (see my Van vaccines and gene therapeutics ) analyzing a possible round of smallpox vaccination . They write (emphasis added):

“After excluding high-risk individuals and their contacts, we estimate that a vaccination strategy directed at people aged 1 to 29 years would result in approximately 1600 serious adverse events and 190 deaths [ at 82.5 million vaccinations ]. Vaccinating people aged 1 to 65 years would result in approximately 4600 serious adverse events and 285 deaths [ at 178.5 million vaccinations ].

Smallpox vaccine has a higher complication rate than any other vaccine currently being used . Careful prevaccination exclusion of high-risk individuals and their close contacts would be essential to minimize complications of a mass vaccination campaign….”

So ... vaccination against smallpox was until recently considered the riskiest of all immunizations .

It is clear that the numbers of side effects and deaths that Pfizer itself reports over the first months of using their mRNA product far exceed the smallpox vaccination numbers.

Based on the number of deaths per number of smallpox vaccinations administered, with an equal risk profile for mortality, 765.98 million mRNA shots should be administered within 2 1/2 months.


That is impossible. That number should be much lower.

The risk of the Pfizer mRNA shot of death alone, if we take the reported death rates as they are, is a lot higher than with the smallpox immunization (which we have a lot of knowledge about).

What should we think of this? The most obvious response is to pose the cause and effect issue:

• Can the deaths actually be linked to the mRNA shot?

An unequivocal answer to this question cannot be given. And that is exactly the crux. The mRNA gene therapeutics against viruses in humans are new; we know very little about its effects on our bodies.

However, referring to, for example, underlying and unknown suffering as a co-cause of death after the mRNA shot - see Pfizer's disclaimer quoted above - inspires very little confidence.

• Because: does the mRNA shot destabilize the unknown 'not entirely robust health' of victims? To what extent then?
• Which individuals are exactly 'destabilized' by the mRNA shot? And: in what terms?

We don't have answers to these questions either.

These are just the reported numbers for a very short time after introduction. What do we know about the long-term effects of Pfizer 's mRNA shot and other similar gene therapeutics?

• Answer: nothing. Is that worrying? No idea!

Ultimately, any form of medical intervention, including vaccines and innovative gene therapeutics, is a trade-off between benefits and costs, risks and benefits.
Both in the short and long term.

In addition, the use of vaccines and mRNA resources must be compared with the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of pathogens.

To recap: The Infection Fatality Rate is the number of deaths from, for example, SARS-CoV-2 divided by the total number of SARS-CoV-2 infected.
For smallpox, the IFR has been known for a long time: ±30% . And to think that all smallpox infections visibly lead to symptoms and death, in 1 in 3 cases!

SARS-CoV-2 is a completely different "beast." Many go through the infection without any apparent symptoms. That is why the IFR for this virus is difficult to estimate.
John Ioannidis puts an IFR in people under 70 years old at up to 0.31% . As is often said, COVID-19 is mainly a disease of old age.

Even if the IFR were to be twice as high, we would not come close to the IFR for smallpox.

• Conclusion: in the context of the risks of COVID-19, the risks of the mRNA shot seem quite substantial.

And to think that on February 28 of this year, vaccine effectiveness was unknown (among many other issues about which no knowledge was available; p. 9):

It is high time for a thorough review of all mRNA gene therapeutics, with all available data from relevant pharmaceuticals and government agencies that approve such technology.
The sooner the better!

• In addition, all 'mRNA coercion' must be stopped. The first documentation gives every reason to do so.

( No : I am not against vaccinations, but I am against the absence of comprehensive and transparent benefit-cost analyzes of the mRNA shot.)
In conclusion, political and public discussion about this form of medical technology should be informed with reports like this one. (And: lots more documentation to come.)

Personally, I have had my fill of fact-free chatter in, for example, the media and politics in The Hague. Among other things …

source (Dutch).

• phmpt.org/pfizers-documents
• phmpt.org/court-documents
  

[mountain_jim]

The ‘VAIDS’ PANDEMIC (Vaccine Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) | New Moral Order

https://agrdailynews.com/2021/12/04/...w-moral-order/






Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eosnwyX7qNUT

[mountain_jim]

https://gab.com/vaccineregrets/posts/107403080205303923

(do not know if true or not)

[mountain_jim]

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/12/...-could-happen/

(go to link for many links in text)

Call To Suspend Covid-19 Vaccination Upon Discovery Of Spike Protein In The Nucleus Of Living Cells

Resveratrol Pills Could Rescue The Vaccinated

The horror of horrors has happened. Spike protein produced by injected RNA vaccines has been found in the nucleus of living cells and can weaken the human immune response and impair immunity.

Over 4 billion Covid-10 vaccinated people on earth had better be searching for the red wine molecule resveratrol today based upon the news that the Covid-19 RNA vaccines, which program for spike protein to enter the watery cytoplasm of cells, but have now been found to “localize in the nucleus of cells” and inhibit DNA repair and therefore impede the human adaptive immune response.

At this point the only way to reverse the problem is to consume resveratrol, a red wine molecule, which has been documented to counter reverse transcriptase, the enzyme that facilitates entry of the spike protein into the nuclear genetic center of living cells.

This genetic catastrophe is reported in a recent issue of the journal Viruses.

The immunized were given mistaken assurances

Immunized people were assured the RNA for spike protein could not get into the nucleus of cells to re-program the cell. If DNA damage cannot be properly repaired, it will contribute to the amplification of viral infection-induced pathology. While Covid-19 virus proteins are synthesized in the watery cytoplasm, some viral proteins are now detectable in the cell nucleus. The discovery of spike protein in the nucleus came as a surprise.

Adaptive immunity, which kicks in days after initial infection, produces the memory antibodies and memory T-cells that confer long-term immunity.

Researchers say “Our findings provide evidence of the spike protein hijacking the DNA damage repair” in a lab dish.

These scientists suggest subunits of the spike protein rather than full-length spike protein, which is what current Covid-19 vaccines deliver, should be re-considered in order to side-step this potentially deleterious drawback of current vaccines.

Predicted by MIT scientists

Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh at MIT warned in May of 2021 of the possibility of injected RNA being incorporated into DNA for transgenerational transmissions. What that means is that vaccinated individuals could transmit the spike protein to their offspring. forbode

Their foreboding report by MIT researchers was published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research.

The rush to produce these RNA Covid-19 vaccines, for a virus that turned out to be no more deadly or infective than the common cold or the flu, has brought about this genetic catastrophe. Rush to market (Operation Warp Speed) efforts by politicians, to curry favor with the public, have backfired. Who will take the political blame now?

In 2011 researchers showed other proteins in coronaviruses were able to move into the nucleus of cells.

Seneff and Nigh wrote: “It has been claimed that mRNA-based vaccines are safer than DNA-vectored vaccines that work by incorporating the genetic code for the target antigenic protein into a DNA virus, because the RNA cannot become inadvertently incorporated into the human genome. It is now indisputable that there is a large class of viruses called retroviruses that carry genes that reverse transcribe RNA back into complementary DNA.

Experimental RNA vaccines, while “having been heralded for their potential benefits, they also harbor the possibility of potentially tragic and even catastrophic unforeseen consequences,” writes Dr. Seneff. These concerns are potentially serious and might not be evident for years or even many generations, she says.

Seneff: “The stakes have never been higher. An experimental RNA vaccine is being injected into billions of people. Given the genetic nature of these vaccines, the masses will have to live with the consequences for the remainder of their lives.”

In August of 2021 this author asked and answered the following question: “Will RNA Covid-19 vaccines gain FDA approval or result in a humongous catastrophe? Answer: probably both.

Resveratrol, a red wine molecule, by virtue of its ability to inhibit reverse transcriptase, could put a halt to this potential biogenetic hazard.

Addendum: Online FACT CHECKERS are saying NO, this study didn’t involve Covid-19 vaccines, it involved Covid-19 virus. But the developers of the Covid-19 vaccines and the National Institutes of Health claim they copied the genetic sequence for Covid-19 spike protein to make the vaccine, which certainly makes this laboratory study pertinent.

The idea of rushing a wholly new vaccine technology (messenger RNA/DNA) into use because an allegedly mutated virus no human had immunity against was totally bogus. For example, people in Taiwan exhibited immunity from prior exposure to SARS-2002 coronavirus outbreak as Taiwanese 80.0% cross-reactive antibodies between SARS (2003) and Covid-19 (2000). Furthermore, human research concerns like these are to be handled carefully and to err on the side of precaution.

Furthermore, Covid-19 vaccines are not conferring immunity to prevent transmission or infectiveness, but only reduce mortality and hospitalization. This makes the RNA vaccines perfect for the drug companies – – treatment is perpetual, but there is no cure.

Mortality data from the VAERS database reveal more deaths from Covid-19 vaccines than all other vaccines combined. –B Sardi

[ExomatrixTV]

• Is it true that our natural ADAPTIVE immune system is compromised the moment you take part in mRNA injection experiments?
• Factors robbing Quality of Life on many levels and decreasing life-expectancy not counting how many commit suicide because of it.

cheers,
John

[ExomatrixTV]

• Update from Funeral Director John O'Looney

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Evidence That They KNEW the Covid Jab Would Kill Thousands:

• source

[Sérénité]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Update from Funeral Director John O'Looney

• source

So shocking it needs to be put in bold;

“I’ve seen more [deaths from] blood clots this last year then I have in the previous 14 year altogether”

[Hughe]

DEVASTATED PARENTS WARN HOW THE COVID SHOTS KILLED OR CRIPPLED THEIR CHILDREN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fK3i0JRZE3RL/

[Delight]

ARE DEATHS AND ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS FOLLOWING
VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19 PATHOLOGICALLY RELATED?
The 2nd Pathology Conference
Dec 4th 2021 from 5 p.m. CET

The reports about serious health damages up to deaths in temporal connection with the current vaccinations against Covid-19 do not tear off. Is there a causal relationship here between the serious health damage and deaths and the previously administered vaccination against Covid -19, which can be proven pathologically?

The link to the livestream, will be posted later in the Telegram channel and also here:
http://www.pathologie-konferenz.de/en

Dear ladies and gentlemen, dear representatives of the press,
we hereby invite you to our press conference on the occasion of current events:
Reports about serious health damages even deaths in close temporal connection
with the current vaccinations against Covid-19 do not tear off.
Is there a causal connection between severe health damages and deaths with the
previously administered vaccination against Covid-19, which can be proven
pathologically?
1.What do we currently know from pathological examinations of 19 persons who died
in temporal conjunction with the vaccination?
2.What results were obtained from the analyses of the tissue samples?
3.What other relevant observations have been made about tumors and their growth
patterns?
4.Is there evidence from general death data of excess mortality caused by
vaccination?
5.What are other urgent survey and research demands?
Analysis of tissue samples from deceased persons
Pathologists Professor Dr. Burkhardt and Professor Dr. Lang have examined tissue
samples obtained from 19 autopsies of deceased persons whose deaths occurred in
a temporal association with vaccinations against Covid-19. The results of these
investigations will be presented and discussed at the International Pathology
Conference.
Tumor growth enhanced by Corona vaccines?
Dr. Krüger, a Swedish pathologist, will report on her observations that since this year,
malignant tumors in the breast are often larger and more aggressive than usual at
diagnosis, and patients are younger than the long-term average. Also, many
histopathologic findings of tumor tissue since the start of Covid-19 vaccination have
differed markedly from those Dr. Krüger has seen in her long professional career.
The report is supplemented by the reports of "turbo cancer" that have accumulated in
oncology practice.
Methodical detection of spike proteins by mass spectrometry
Pathologist Prof. Dr. Lang will report on a new scientific method for reliable detection
of minute quantities of spike proteins in tissue. Detection would provide evidence that
the tissue lesions observed microscopically are indeed caused by the spike proteins,
as typically found in scientific research on Covid.
Current status of fatality investigation procedures
Finally, the current status of fatality investigations is reported. These include the case
of a middle-aged man who died in a causal relationship with vaccination as
established by forensic medicine, as well as the status of the investigation into the
case of the 15-year-old girl who died after vaccination in mid-November 2021.
Insights obtained from statistical analyses of mortality data
Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz will present his analyses of mortality data provided by
government agencies. He will present evidence of higher mortality of vaccinated
compared to unvaccinated persons, especially in the age group 10 - 59 years, and
discuss resulting conclusions.
__________________________________________________________________
We look forward to welcoming you and are available to answer your questions and, if
necessary, arrange interviews with our experts.
Inquiries: Elmar Becker, Attorney at Law wsu.becker@posteo.de
The speakers:
Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt has a long history of teaching at the Universities of
Hamburg, Bern and Tübingen as well as visiting professorships/study visits in Japan
(Nihon University), USA (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia
and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years, after
which he worked as a practicing pathologist. Prof. Burkhardt has published over 150
articles in journals and numerous contributions to handbooks. He has also certified
pathological institutes
Prof. Dr. Walter Lang has spent 27 years running a private institute he founded for
pathology with a focus on transplantation pathology, extragynecological cytology,
thyroid tumors, lung/pleural pathology. He performed Consultation diagnostics for 12
major pulmonary clinics and provided Liver Pathology services for numerous clinics.
During the period 2010-2020, he supervised he supervised the pathology of the lung
clinic in Herner.
Ute Krüger, MD, is a specialist in pathology and senior physician at a Municipal
Hospital in southern Sweden. For the past 18 years, she has been primarily with the
diagnosis of breast cancer.
Prof. Dr. Werner Bergholz is a former professor of electrical engineering with a with
a focus on quality and risk management at the Jakobs University in Bremen. Prior to
his appointment, Prof. Bergholz worked for 17 years in the management of chip
production at Siemens.
Current evidence from the scientific literature on other Vaccine adverse
events:
Increased cases of herpes zoster: (https://www.cureus.com/articles/7435...-of-five-cases)
Significantly increased cases of myocarditis:
(https://link.springer.com/article/10...92-021-01974-0)

2nd Pathology Conference - ARE DEATHS AND ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS AFTER VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19 RELATED IN A PATHOLOGICALLY DETECTABLE WAY?

[Gwin Ru]

Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried To Have Sealed For 55 years Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release

The Most Shocking Document Release Of The Last 100 years

Celia Farber

Dec 5, 2021

Dear readers of my Substack, I want to tell you urgently that I am sitting here, as shocked as I can remember being, since I began reporting on pharmaceutical and government/ pharmaceutical predation in 1987/1988, at a rock magazine called SPIN. I've spent most of my life shocked, often disoriented, wondering if I can believe my own eyes, and trying to square the countless attacks on my own sanity with what appears to be the impossibly dark truth. For years I processed the relentless violence as some kind of possibility that I had missed something. I don’t anymore. Everybody who has failed to oppose this is complicit in mass murder. There are not “two sides.” Pfizer itself can explain exactly why all the people dropping dead have died, but they felt it should be hidden for 55 years, so they could continue to murder and maim without interference. The mass media is the engine of the catastrophe, the sine qua non.

Most smoking guns are not really smoking guns, but this one is.

A group called “Public Health and Medical Professional For Transparency Documents” sued the FDA for the release of Pfizer’s documents concerning adverse events from their Covid “vaccine”, which Pfizer fought to have concealed 55 years, but a courageous judge ordered them released anyway.

They wrote on their website:

”Four days after the Pfizer vaccine was approved for ages 16+, we submitted a Freedom of Information Act Request to the FDA for all of the data within Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine biological product file. We have now sued the FDA for not releasing the data. Click below for court documents and for productions of Pfizer’s documents from the FDA.”

Link: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

My God.

In the 90 days following EUA release of the “vaccine” they recorded 1223 deaths, and 158,000 adverse reactions, including fetal deaths, spontaneous abortions and more. They call this, in their encrypted, trans-human Pharma-lingo, the “post marketing experience.” [See link above]

Whose experience? Pfizer’s, or the dead?

I failed to catch on to this when it was released a few days ago, for which I apologize. Mark Crispin Miller sent it out today and I realized I’d missed something incredibly important. I opened the document and began to read, as my mind short-circuited. One thinks one has seen it all, but no.

I’d heard Alex Jones apoplectically reporting on it this week but for some reason I still didn’t drop what I was doing and go to it. Mike Adams reported comprehensively on it here.

Normally I write prose, sentences, but now I am dropping a massive boulder of words, a sheer word cloud, so you can have a visual sense of the extent of the “adverse events” Pfizer outrageously and blithely calls “..of special interest.” [Note: The events are in fact a master list of potential events that encompass all adverse events they have ever collected. See update and correction here.

These “events” have never been “of special interest” to the protected class of mass media vaccine propagandists, but they are REAL. They are now here in black and white, from Pfizer’s own documents. They mirror exactly what everybody who has been trying to sound the alarm has ever said; There is no mystery anymore.

Anybody who tells you these “vaccines” are safe is somewhere between hypnotized, dishonest, and malicious.

As these Pfizer documents lay bare, our bodies are nothing but their field of sadistic experimentation, their wealth gain, their total self-appointed right to destroy life, while raking in billions, maybe trillions, and even guilt-tripping their endless victims for not promoting “vaccines” once they have been crippled. Even the dead are expected to promote vaccines from the grave, via their surviving loved ones.

Yet you are an “anti-vaxxer.”

And this is a fate worse, they make clear, than death.

But no need to believe “anti-vaxxers” anymore—here’s the data from Pfizer, of everything these predators have “observed” in their victims, whose lives they are ostensibly so insistent upon “saving” and who were healthy before the shots, but spellbound by fear, and sacrificed by an unspeakably cold-blooded media:

APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

1p36 deletion syndrome;2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria;5'nucleotidase increased;Acoustic neuritis;Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency;Acquired epidermolysis bullosa;Acquired epileptic aphasia;Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures;Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis;Acute flaccid myelitis;Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis;Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy;Acute kidney injury;Acute macular outer retinopathy;Acute motor axonal neuropathy;Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy;Acute myocardial infarction;Acute respiratory distress syndrome; [note: that sounds like “Covid 19.”] Acute respiratory failure;Addison's disease;Administration site thrombosis;Administration site vasculitis;Adrenal thrombosis;Adverse event following immunisation;Ageusia;Agranulocytosis;Air embolism;Alanine aminotransferase abnormal;Alanine aminotransferase increased;Alcoholic seizure;Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis;Allergic oedema;Alloimmune hepatitis;Alopecia areata;Alpers disease;Alveolar proteinosis;Ammonia abnormal;Ammonia increased;Amniotic cavity infection;Amygdalohippocampectomy;Amyloid arthropathy;Amyloidosis;Amyloidosis senile;Anaphylactic reaction;Anaphylactic shock;Anaphylactic transfusion reaction;Anaphylactoid reaction;Anaphylactoid shock;Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy;Angioedema;Angiopathic neuropathy;Ankylosing spondylitis;Anosmia;Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody positive;Anti-actin antibody positive;Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positive;Anti-basal ganglia antibody positive;Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive;Anti-epithelial antibody positive;Anti-erythrocyte antibody positive;Anti-exosome complex antibody positive;Anti- GAD antibody negative;Anti-GAD antibody positive;Anti-ganglioside antibody positive;Antigliadin antibody positive;Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody positive;Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease;Anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase antibody positive;Anti-HLA antibody test positive;Anti-IA2 antibody positive;Anti-insulin antibody increased;Anti-insulin antibody positive;Anti-insulin receptor antibody increased;Anti- insulin receptor antibody positive;Anti-interferon antibody negative;Anti-interferon antibody positive;Anti-islet cell antibody positive;Antimitochondrial antibody positive;Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive;Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies positive;Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein associated polyneuropathy;Antimyocardial antibody positive;Anti-neuronal antibody positive;Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody increased;Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive;Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis;Anti-NMDA antibody positive;Antinuclear antibody increased;Antinuclear antibody positive;Antiphospholipid antibodies positive;Antiphospholipid syndrome;Anti-platelet antibody positive;Anti-prothrombin antibody positive;Antiribosomal P antibody positive;Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody positive;Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody test positive;Anti-sperm antibody positive;Anti-SRP antibody positive;Antisynthetase syndrome;Anti-thyroid antibody positive;Anti-transglutaminase antibody increased;Anti-VGCC antibody positive;Anti- VGKC antibody positive;Anti-vimentin antibody positive;Antiviral prophylaxis;Antiviral treatment;Anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody positive;Aortic embolus;Aortic thrombosis;Aortitis;Aplasia pure red cell;Aplastic anaemia;Application site thrombosis;Application site vasculitis;Arrhythmia;Arterial bypass occlusion;Arterial bypass thrombosis;Arterial thrombosis;Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis;Arteriovenous graft site stenosis;Arteriovenous graft thrombosis;Arteritis;Arteritis

CONFIDENTIAL Page 1

FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0000083

Page 30

090177e196ea1800\Approved\Approved On: 30-Apr-2021 09:26 (GMT)

BNT162b2

5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports
coronary;Arthralgia;Arthritis;Arthritis enteropathic;Ascites;Aseptic cavernous sinus thrombosis;Aspartate aminotransferase abnormal;Aspartate aminotransferase increased;Aspartate-glutamate-transporter deficiency;AST to platelet ratio index increased;AST/ALT ratio abnormal;Asthma;Asymptomatic COVID- 19;Ataxia;Atheroembolism;Atonic seizures;Atrial thrombosis;Atrophic thyroiditis;Atypical benign partial epilepsy;Atypical pneumonia [Note: This sounds like the original definition of Covid-19 out of Wuhan];Aura;Autoantibody positive;Autoimmune anaemia;Autoimmune aplastic anaemia;Autoimmune arthritis;Autoimmune blistering disease;Autoimmune cholangitis;Autoimmune colitis;Autoimmune demyelinating disease;Autoimmune dermatitis;Autoimmune disorder;Autoimmune encephalopathy;Autoimmune endocrine disorder;Autoimmune enteropathy;Autoimmune eye disorder;Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia;Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;Autoimmune hepatitis;Autoimmune hyperlipidaemia;Autoimmune hypothyroidism;Autoimmune inner ear disease;Autoimmune lung disease;Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome;Autoimmune myocarditis;Autoimmune myositis;Autoimmune nephritis;Autoimmune neuropathy;Autoimmune neutropenia;Autoimmune pancreatitis;Autoimmune pancytopenia;Autoimmune pericarditis;Autoimmune retinopathy;Autoimmune thyroid disorder;Autoimmune thyroiditis;Autoimmune uveitis;Autoinflammation with infantile enterocolitis;Autoinflammatory disease;Automatism epileptic;Autonomic nervous system imbalance;Autonomic seizure;Axial spondyloarthritis;Axillary vein thrombosis;Axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy;Axonal neuropathy;Bacterascites;Baltic myoclonic epilepsy;Band sensation;Basedow's disease;Basilar artery thrombosis;Basophilopenia;B-cell aplasia;Behcet's syndrome;Benign ethnic neutropenia;Benign familial neonatal convulsions;Benign familial pemphigus;Benign rolandic epilepsy;Beta-2 glycoprotein antibody positive;Bickerstaff's encephalitis;Bile output abnormal;Bile output decreased;Biliary ascites;Bilirubin conjugated abnormal;Bilirubin conjugated increased;Bilirubin urine present;Biopsy liver abnormal;Biotinidase deficiency;Birdshot chorioretinopathy;Blood alkaline phosphatase abnormal;Blood alkaline phosphatase increased;Blood bilirubin abnormal;Blood bilirubin increased;Blood bilirubin unconjugated increased;Blood cholinesterase abnormal;Blood cholinesterase decreased;Blood pressure decreased;Blood pressure diastolic decreased;Blood pressure systolic decreased;Blue toe syndrome;Brachiocephalic vein thrombosis;Brain stem embolism;Brain stem thrombosis;Bromosulphthalein test abnormal;Bronchial oedema;Bronchitis;Bronchitis mycoplasmal;Bronchitis viral;Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic;Bronchospasm;Budd- Chiari syndrome;Bulbar palsy;Butterfly rash;C1q nephropathy;Caesarean section;Calcium embolism;Capillaritis;Caplan's syndrome;Cardiac amyloidosis;Cardiac arrest;Cardiac failure;Cardiac failure acute;Cardiac sarcoidosis;Cardiac ventricular thrombosis;Cardiogenic shock;Cardiolipin antibody positive;Cardiopulmonary failure;Cardio-respiratory arrest;Cardio-respiratory distress;Cardiovascular insufficiency;Carotid arterial embolus;Carotid artery thrombosis;Cataplexy;Catheter site thrombosis;Catheter site vasculitis;Cavernous sinus thrombosis;CDKL5 deficiency disorder;CEC syndrome;Cement embolism;Central nervous system lupus;Central nervous system vasculitis;Cerebellar artery thrombosis;Cerebellar embolism;Cerebral amyloid angiopathy;Cerebral arteritis;Cerebral artery embolism;Cerebral artery thrombosis;Cerebral gas embolism;Cerebral microembolism;Cerebral septic infarct;Cerebral thrombosis;Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis;Cerebral venous thrombosis;Cerebrospinal thrombotic

CONFIDENTIAL Page 2

FDA-CBER-2021-5683-0000084

Page 31

[...]

Full article: https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/c...documents-they

--------------------------------------------------------------

... who would give "Informed Consent" to risk any of the adverse effects listed on more than 8 pages?

[janette]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://gab.com/vaccineregrets/posts/107403080205303923

(do not know if true or not)

Wow ..a doctor with a conscious who actually tells the truth and still they don't believe ..what's it going to take ?

[Gwin Ru]

...

... additional comment fron Jon Rappoport:

Pfizer smoking-gun secret document: their deadly COVID vaccine

by Jon Rappoport
Dec7, 2021

Awakening from the trance

CORRECTION: After publishing this article, I discovered that the gigantic Pfizer list of medical conditions was apparently not a report on logged cases of adverse events, but instead a complete list of conditions that Pfizer would be monitoring, in order to see whether they popped up on their radar as reactions to the COVID vaccine.

Why would Pfizer publish this extraordinary list? Because as they state, these medical conditions have been associated with severe COVID-19 “and vaccines in general.” In other words, vaccines in general, historically, have carried enormous risk and dangers over an incredibly wide area of medical conditions. This is a key confession.

Further, if you read the full secret Pfizer document, you will come to Table 7, which does list a number of categories of adverse reactions, all of which WERE reported in the first three months of the Pfizer vaccine rollout. This IS stunning.

In the secret document, Pfizer does list 1,223 deaths occurring after just three months of the vaccine rollout. This should have been sufficient to cause a complete halt to the vaccination program.

Finally, Pfizer admits that in the first three months of the vaccine rollout, it logged a staggering 42,086 cases of adverse reactions. And as far as I can determine from the Pfizer document, these 42,086 cases represented a total of 139,888 adverse events. In other words, in many cases, there were reports of multiple adverse events.

------------------------------------------------

[Jon's original article:]

Journalist Celia Farber just wrote an explosive article on the Pfizer secret document. You should read it (and her addendum, here). She deserves our thanks and gratitude. And here you can also read the document itself.

In short, the Pfizer document (which was never supposed to see the light of day but was disclosed as part of a FOIA suit) describes the adverse effects from just the first three months of injections with the company’s COVID vaccine:

[...]

Full article: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...covid-vaccine/

[ExomatrixTV]

• 1200 Dead in First 90 Days:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=wCbohvmiigY

This episode reviews a previously hidden report by Pfizer to the FDA covering the first 90 days of ‘post authorization’ vaccine safety data. A judge ordered its release and, perhaps not surprisingly, no major news outlet has dared to cover the story.
Within that first 90- day window, over 1,200 deaths were reported, with a significant number appearing to happen within the first 24 hours after vaccination. We can’t say for sure because the report lacks critical details that would allow us to align the specific deaths with the reported observation that the median elapsed time between vaccination and the adverse event was “<24 hours” for many types of AEs.

This report is a ‘second go’ by Pfizer after the first report was deemed wholly insufficient and lacking detail. This one isn’t actually all that much better, as it is entirely passive (no active data collection undertaken – it relies entirely on “spontaneously” reported events, and no inquiry into the adverse events is part of this version of the report), there’s no attempt made to define the incidence of events, and there is no visible effort made to compare the levels of events to an expected baseline of such events.

It is also impossible to determine first vs second vaccination injections (not reported) and the age brackets are not even age brackets (“child, adult and elderly”).
Besides the 1,223 spontaneously reported deaths, there is an overwhelming tilt towards women reporting AE’s often on the order of 4x or more. None of these were deemed to be worthy of modifying either the administration of the vaccines or the collection of new data in more useful detail.

Further, I track down the actual state of knowledge of what is and is not known about pregnancy and the vaccines to uncover the fact that no providers can say, one way or the other, if the vaccines are safe.

In the most current language available to vaccinators and health care providers, Pfizer says “Available data on COMIRNATY administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.”

Naturally, without being able to articulate the actual risk, true informed consent is not possible for pregnant women seeking to understand what the risks might be to their unborn child. All that can truthfully be said is “we don’t know.”
If more robust data does exist, it is not yet been made public. We may have to wait up to 55 years for that.

Report title: 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021
Links to Referenced Material

• Mattias Desmet interview
• AMA – Informed Consent
• Informed Consent – Pfizer Proivder Labelling (Pregnancy)

FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

This video is intended for EDUCATIONAL and ENTERTAINMENT purposes ONLY and is NOT to be construed as LEGAL, FINANCIAL or MEDICAL ADVICE. Repeat: THIS IS NOT LEGAL, FINANCIAL or MEDICAL ADVICE. We are not legal, financial or medical experts. In case we lose our YouTube channel, be prepared to subscribe to us in other ways.

00:00 – Intro
02:17 – Pfizer Safety Data “Leaked”
09:38 – Known Limitations of SAEs
12:59 – Issues Immediately Apparent in Table 1
21:32 – Safety: Preganancy
24:08 – Children – Off Label Use
27:09 – Heart Issues (Known by Feb 28, 2021)
31:15 – Immune-Mediated
33:34 – Informed Consent
40:44 – What is “informed Consent” for Pregnancy?
43:00 – Conclusions

[mountain_jim]

orig seen

https://t.me/s/DrLynnFynn/694

and cliff

This is in the Oct / Nov issue of Airline Pilot Magazine, US publication " (ALPA)

Pilot deaths in the USA:
2019 - 1,
2020 - 6,
2021 - 111 in 9 months ...

WHY DO YOU THINK?

[ExomatrixTV]

• #RealNotRare: Vax-Injured Women Release Video To Raise Awareness About Adverse Reactions

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=o73dQ5vZenY

A group of women who had their lives turned upside down after taking an experimental Covid shot recently created a video meant to bring attention to their adverse reactions.

“Hello, Pfizer. Hello, Moderna. Hello, AstraZeneca. Hello, Johnson & Johnson,” the women tell the camera in the video’s intro. “Hello, CDC. Hello, FDA,” they add.

Ladies with both European and American accents tell the audience, “Our goal is not intended to spread a further divide in the vaxxed Vs. anti-vax community. We are pro-choice, pro-information, but most importantly pro-safety.”

“We have been hurt, our lives have been altered and we need help,” the women continue. “Doctors are scrambling for answers and we are desperate for help. Help share our stories, help our voices be heard. Help us bring together the medical community so we can receive the help we so desperately need. We are real, we are here and we want our lives back. #RealNotRare.”

The information gatekeepers working for the world’s largest social media companies have decided the hashtag #RealNotRare is potentially spreading misinformation as seen in the following screenshot from Instagram.

“Looking for vaccine info?” Instagram asks when a user searches for the hashtag. “When it comes to health, everyone wants reliable, up-to-date information. Visit the website for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The website has information that can help answer questions you may have about vaccines.”

Users are then directed to the CDC website if they click on the link provided by Instagram.

After bypassing the social media site’s prompt, users can see about 30 posts by vaccine-injured people or their families.

However, at the bottom of the first page of search results, Instagram admits to hiding other posts using that hashtag because, “Some posts may not follow Instagram’s Community Guidelines.”

For all we know, there could be hundreds of thousands of posts under the hashtag, but Instagram won’t let anyone see.

This is just one small example of the censorship loopholes these women are forced to trek through in order to have their voices heard.

One of the women who appeared in the video posted it to her social media this week, writing, “To the incredible women I’ve met along the way, thank you. Thank you for your strength, your support and your sisterhood. The past six months would have been unbearable without you, so thank you. You each have handled an impossible situation with such grace and I can only hope I’ve done the same. Your resilience and determination despite difficult circumstances and faltering health is truly inspiring.”

She told her followers, “To the audience in attendance – I hope that each of you have kept an open heart and an open mind. Many of us are facing the most challenging health battle of our lives, all while navigating through a heavily debated and highly controversial topic. Our health has been politicized, scrutinized and heavily criticized. And honestly, it’s been a hard place to heal.”

“I understand that many of you may find it hard to believe that this can happen,” she continued. “And I don’t blame you, I’m still in disbelief myself. I also understand that your skepticism likely stems from the fact that this hasn’t happened to you or your loved ones. And I pray it never will. But, this is real and it is happening, to us.”

The vaccine-injured young lady added, “I can only hope that one day answers as to why this happened will surface, that studies are enacted to prevent future complications and that further research is conducted for the enhancement of both health and science. Above all, I truly hope no one will have to endure what we have the past six months. It’s been tough, but so are we.”

Shame on those who are preventing these testimonies from being heard as well as those who quickly dismiss these personal accounts all in the name of politics.

source

• facebook.com/groups/realnotrare
• t.me/realnotrare
• twitter.com/RealNotRare
• instagram.com/realnotrareteam
• tiktok.com/@realnotrareteam
• realnotrare.com

[ExomatrixTV]

• Professor who studied the first mRNA corona vaccines: 'Completely ridiculous what is happening'

It's completely ridiculous what's happening, Professor Byram Bridle of the University of Guelph in Canada said on the TV show The Ingraham Angle . Bridle is in a group that studied the first mRNA coronavirus vaccines.

These vaccines are completely ineffective, and by administering an infinite number of doses, they are thought to suddenly become effective. There is now enough evidence to show that we will never achieve herd immunity with the vaccines, says Professor Bridle.


Photo: Byram Bridle (Videostill Rumble/Free Speech Media)

• Just as easy

According to him, the new variants can easily bypass the vaccines. In addition, it has become almost impossible to hide the damage caused by the vaccines.
People who are "fully vaccinated" can still get infected. They can still get corona. They can still die from corona. And they spread the virus at least as easily as people without immunity, the immunologist emphasized.

• Tyranny

There is even talk of a fourth dose. This is all about money, it has nothing to do with science, said Professor Bridle. "This is ridiculous."
Most people don't need the vaccines, let alone a third or fourth dose, said the professor, who spoke of "tyranny."

source

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• POWERFUL: Woman Wakes Up To Reality When Her Husband Gets Myocarditis From A Covid Shot

A woman who once bought into the establishment narratives surrounding Covid-19, vaccinations and “conspiracy theories” speaks out about her rude awakening following an adverse reaction her husband suffered after taking the experimental jab.

Harrison Smith covers this sad account in this segment of The American Journal.

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Heavily-Vaccinated Northeastern States Struggle With Surging Hospitalizations