Vaccine Crimes

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by jaybee (here)
[...]
I wonder where the transcript for this is.... ?
[...]

Courtesy of RunningDeer:

Where to find the transcripts for the video: [Youtube videos]

PS: I couldn't find the transcript he mentioned either.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p

[jaybee]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)

Posted by jaybee (here)
[...]
I wonder where the transcript for this is.... ?
[...]

Courtesy of RunningDeer:

Where to find the transcripts for the video: [Youtube videos]

thanks - just found the time stamped transcript by the video - he did say, during the presentation that he had done text of the statement and I've tried to find it but no luck so far - I thought it could be a good thing to print off.....

just seen your edit -

[DSKlausler]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
A most excellent PDF summary of the entire thing, compiled by my highly skilled and able naturopath in Ecuador (an expat Canadian), Patrick Coady.

• https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf

Hey Bill... I'd like to link to that directly on the InterWeb (not here), but cannot locate it. Do you have a direct source?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by DSKlausler (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
A most excellent PDF summary of the entire thing, compiled by my highly skilled and able naturopath in Ecuador (an expat Canadian), Patrick Coady.

• https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf

Hey Bill... I'd like to link to that directly on the InterWeb (not here), but cannot locate it. Do you have a direct source?

It was sent to me as an email attachment... I'm on Patrick Coady's list, as a client and also a friend. But he invited me to share it widely. The only URL is https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf.

[Kryztian]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
A most excellent PDF summary of the entire thing, compiled by my highly skilled and able naturopath in Ecuador (an expat Canadian), Patrick Coady.

• https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf

On the first page of this report it states:

One of the documents recently released shows that during the pre-launch human trial, 1 in 17 participants died from the shot.

"Wow", I thought, "could that possibly be true???" So I looked at the report and the link to the Bernican, which came up with the "1 in 17" number.

Page 7 of the report does show that there were 1,223 fatalities, which is a significant number, but without knowing how many people were in the group who received the vaccine, you can not determine the fatality rate. "The Bernician" shows that there this is from 21,325 but I have no idea where he got that number. The fatalities number is from 42,086 "cases", which would make the rate more like "1 in 34", still tremendous. However, "cases" seems not to refer to everyone who was given the jab, but just the people who had complications and there was a case report filed by 28 February 2021. One should assume that there were a lot of incidents where the person did not experience symptoms that were strong enough where they felt a report needed to be filed.

So how many people got the jab for the group that created 42,086 cases? It doesn't say on the report. On page 6 it states:

It is estimated that approximately (b) (4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021.

The "(b) (4)" appears several places where there should be numbers in the document and is placed over a gray box of vary widths. It seems that this is their way to redact information. So there is no way to know for sure from this report what the fatality rate is. Assuming one out of 5 persons had complications from the jab and filled out a report, this would put the rate at 1 in 170, or 0.59%, still a very high rate! One might say that it was comparable to the death rate of COVID-19 at that time, but, this would not be a fair comparison. Most of the deaths from COVID-19 were elderly, while most of the cases that had complications from the vaccine were from people in the age 31 to 50 group.

There is some good info in Coady's report but the "1 in 17" claim is not accurate and I would verify other statistics here.

[Mare]

Dr Sucharid Bhakti: Organs of dead vaccinated people prove auto-immune attack.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9

[Hermoor]

Those who pull the strings of their WHO puppets want 70% of the world's population jabbed by the middle of 2022.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Great to have a homicidal maniac at the helm of the world's health organization? And not a doctor? But adamant about a protocol, based on what science?, and whose agenda?

Meanwhile, Pfizer advocates for a secrecy freeze of 75 years on all its covid related data, emails, and testing.

Throughout, as the talking heads continue to alter the criteria for mitigation and obscure inconvenient facts about the vax, Kennedy and many others experts have been saying the same thing over and over for two years. Their simple message has not changed. The WHO and its cohorts, in contrast, have been inconsistent and ineffective by every conceivable measure.

An excellent summary of the new Kennedy book, by Wade Frazier, can be found starting about here.


https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1469752

it is comprehensive...and well worth the read...about Fauci...the HCQ story...the Ivermectin saga...and much more to come

[samildamach]

Posted by Kryztian (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
A most excellent PDF summary of the entire thing, compiled by my highly skilled and able naturopath in Ecuador (an expat Canadian), Patrick Coady.

• https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf

https://projectavalon.net/COVID-19_S..._Not_Right.pdf

On the first page of this report it states:

One of the documents recently released shows that during the pre-launch human trial, 1 in 17 participants died from the shot.

"Wow", I thought, "could that possibly be true???" So I looked at the report and the link to the Bernican, which came up with the "1 in 17" number.

Page 7 of the report does show that there were 1,223 fatalities, which is a significant number, but without knowing how many people were in the group who received the vaccine, you can not determine the fatality rate. "The Bernician" shows that there this is from 21,325 but I have no idea where he got that number. The fatalities number is from 42,086 "cases", which would make the rate more like "1 in 34", still tremendous. However, "cases" seems not to refer to everyone who was given the jab, but just the people who had complications and there was a case report filed by 28 February 2021. One should assume that there were a lot of incidents where the person did not experience symptoms that were strong enough where they felt a report needed to be filed.

So how many people got the jab for the group that created 42,086 cases? It doesn't say on the report. On page 6 it states:

It is estimated that approximately (b) (4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021.

The "(b) (4)" appears several places where there should be numbers in the document and is placed over a gray box of vary widths. It seems that this is their way to redact information. So there is no way to know for sure from this report what the fatality rate is. Assuming one out of 5 persons had complications from the jab and filled out a report, this would put the rate at 1 in 170, or 0.59%, still a very high rate! One might say that it was comparable to the death rate of COVID-19 at that time, but, this would not be a fair comparison. Most of the deaths from COVID-19 were elderly, while most of the cases that had complications from the vaccine were from people in the age 31 to 50 group.

There is some good info in Coady's report but the "1 in 17" claim is not accurate and I would verify other statistics here.

I read the unreadacted report a few weeks ago.the 41000 included placebo and drop outs who never reported back e.t.c reducing the final number to 21000 of that arm if my memory serves me right.so the 1 in 17 was correct

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by Kryztian (here)
[...]
... The "(b) (4)" appears several places [...]

Regarding the (b)(4) code:

CONFIRMED: THE JAB IS A CLASSIFIED WEAPON

[Eva2]

I notice a video above of Dr. Tedros but don't think the video in this link has been posted yet - please delete if this is a repeat:
WHO Director Dr Tedros Confesses boosters kill children
Dr Mark Trozzi
December 27, 2021

https://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/27/who-...kill-children/

WHO Director Tedros Confesses Boosters Being Used to Kill Children
Another guilty meat puppet, WCH schedule, great Pfizer carnage analysis, and your action is helping restore human rights now
Hi Jerome,

Thank you for receiving today's newsletter.

The WHO is at the top of a list of corrupt organizations that can not be trusted. It should be dismantled and many of the people working there should be arrested and prosecuted. The WHO has lost all credibility or legitimacy.

Today we have a 35 second clip of WHO General-Director Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus recognizing that "some countries are using boosters to kill children". The following snippet is from the WHO's hybrid press conference with Geneva based Palais des Nations journalists held on 20 December, 2021:
https://drtrozzi.org/2021/12/27/who-...kill-children/

Our very best,
-The Trozzi team
https://drtrozzi.org

[Kryztian]

Posted by samildamach (here)

Posted by Kryztian (here)
The "(b) (4)" appears several places where there should be numbers in the document and is placed over a gray box of vary widths. It seems that this is their way to redact information. So there is no way to know for sure from this report what the fatality rate is. Assuming one out of 5 persons had complications from the jab and filled out a report, this would put the rate at 1 in 170, or 0.59%, still a very high rate! One might say that it was comparable to the death rate of COVID-19 at that time, but, this would not be a fair comparison. Most of the deaths from COVID-19 were elderly, while most of the cases that had complications from the vaccine were from people in the age 31 to 50 group.

I read the unreadacted report a few weeks ago.the 41000 included placebo and drop outs who never reported back e.t.c reducing the final number to 21000 of that arm if my memory serves me right.so the 1 in 17 was correct

There were only three short redactions in the report were three instances that contained numbers. The word "placebo" never appears in the 38 pages of the report. Perhaps you must have read a different report?

The 42,086 cases, are AERs, or "Adverse Event Reports". The report is titled "Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports". If you got the vax and didn't have an adverse event, there was no report. From page 6:

3. RESULTS
3.1. Safety Database
3.1.1. General Overview
It is estimated that approximately (b) (4) doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide
from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December
2020 through 28 February 2021.
Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379
medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/_Citizen_Se7en/s...453293575?s=20

[mojo]

Has anyone heard of any reports of smoke coming from peoples heads & eyes bleeding related to a supposed short circuit as a result of 5G sources? I posted it here because there seems to be a connection with the jab. There is one video that shows people trying to put the smoke out from the mans head and they poured water on his head. The video was being filmed in public and we don't get to know the results of the injury. So far two reports and video is out there but it would be great if anyone else knows more about it.

Here is the telegram link maybe someone can post the video?
https://t.me/VoicesofRevelation/1212

[Matthew]

Posted by mojo (here)
Has anyone heard of any reports of smoke coming from peoples heads & eyes bleeding related to a supposed short circuit as a result of 5G sources? I posted it here because there seems to be a connection with the jab. There is one video that shows people trying to put the smoke out from the mans head and they poured water on his head. The video was being filmed in public and we don't get to know the results of the injury. So far two reports and video is out there but it would be great if anyone else knows more about it.

Here is the telegram link maybe someone can post the video?
https://t.me/VoicesofRevelation/1212

No, this is the first time I've ever seen or heard of such a thing. Sure is bizarre. I don't say this glibly, I hope it's a hoax. I guess it's a waiting game and I hope to God I never hear or see anything like this again

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hang on, I came to post something possibly a little off-topic, but not sure where a home may be?



source twitter
Rob Wranglebury
@RWranglebury
2400 comments and we see the same themes repeated.
People are concerned about their health and Government overreach.

No tin foil hats or nanoparticles as the msm would have you believe....

[Ewan]

Posted by Matthew (here)

Posted by mojo (here)
Has anyone heard of any reports of smoke coming from peoples heads & eyes bleeding related to a supposed short circuit as a result of 5G sources? I posted it here because there seems to be a connection with the jab. There is one video that shows people trying to put the smoke out from the mans head and they poured water on his head. The video was being filmed in public and we don't get to know the results of the injury. So far two reports and video is out there but it would be great if anyone else knows more about it.

Here is the telegram link maybe someone can post the video?
https://t.me/VoicesofRevelation/1212

No, this is the first time I've ever seen or heard of such a thing. Sure is bizarre. I don't say this glibly, I hope it's a hoax. I guess it's a waiting game and I hope to God I never hear or see anything like this again

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hang on, I came to post something possibly a little off-topic, but not sure where a home may be?



source twitter
Rob Wranglebury
@RWranglebury
2400 comments and we see the same themes repeated.
People are concerned about their health and Government overreach.

No tin foil hats or nanoparticles as the msm would have you believe....

That Rob Wranglebury tweet led me to https://twitter.com/i/events/1373029089565573129 as a subsequent tweet was labelled as misleading.

On the WHO timeline there is a Chinese Dr. Eric Ding who kindly explains

Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
·
11 May
IVERMECTIN & COVID—Merck, the company that makes Ivermectin (could make a lot of money)—declares no benefit for own drug…

Don't know if he is a sincere believer and doesn't research anything but the Merck patent for Ivermectin expired and any drug company can make it cheaply.

----------------------

Regarding the smoking man above. First thought was he'd been hit by part of a shattered tear gas cannister or similar. Unpleasant viewing whatever it was.

[Tintin]

Posted by Matthew (here)

Posted by mojo (here)
Has anyone heard of any reports of smoke coming from peoples heads & eyes bleeding related to a supposed short circuit as a result of 5G sources? I posted it here because there seems to be a connection with the jab. There is one video that shows people trying to put the smoke out from the mans head and they poured water on his head. The video was being filmed in public and we don't get to know the results of the injury. So far two reports and video is out there but it would be great if anyone else knows more about it.

Here is the telegram link maybe someone can post the video?
https://t.me/VoicesofRevelation/1212

No, this is the first time I've ever seen or heard of such a thing. Sure is bizarre. I don't say this glibly, I hope it's a hoax. I guess it's a waiting game and I hope to God I never hear or see anything like this again

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Hang on, I came to post something possibly a little off-topic, but not sure where a home may be?



source twitter
Rob Wranglebury
@RWranglebury
2400 comments and we see the same themes repeated.
People are concerned about their health and Government overreach.

No tin foil hats or nanoparticles as the msm would have you believe....

Good catch, and I've retweeted that via the forum account copying in the Secretary of State for Health

[Tintin]

Posted by Ewan (here)

Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
·
11 May
IVERMECTIN & COVID—Merck, the company that makes Ivermectin (could make a lot of money)—declares no benefit for own drug…

Don't know if he is a sincere believer and doesn't research anything but the Merck patent for Ivermectin expired and any drug company can make it cheaply.

----------------------

If my memory serves me well the word is that Dr. Eric Dingly-Dangly-Doo here is to be held at arms length. Suspicions are he's a gatekeeper for the narrative. His statement here isn't wrong but he's another mouthpiece, mainly, for the corrupt WHO.

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by mojo (here)
Has anyone heard of any reports of smoke coming from peoples heads & eyes bleeding related to a supposed short circuit as a result of 5G sources? I posted it here because there seems to be a connection with the jab. There is one video that shows people trying to put the smoke out from the mans head and they poured water on his head. The video was being filmed in public and we don't get to know the results of the injury. So far two reports and video is out there but it would be great if anyone else knows more about it.

Here is the telegram link maybe someone can post the video?
https://t.me/VoicesofRevelation/1212

Clif retweeting a Dr. C. Northrup telegram post:

Going over the comments, it seems a similar effect can be caused by a tear-gas grenade shot and lodged in the head... if it were jabbed + 5G there would be more than one head smoking all at the same time... I think.

[Gwin Ru]

BREAKING: Deadly Vax Lot Numbers IDENTIFIED, Still in Circulation! 14:48

Stew Peters Show
Published January 3, 2022
81,983 Views

Rumble — Still, it’s a dangerous world out there, and the enemies of the American people will be just as committed to destroying you in 2022 as they were in 2021. And that means more masking, more restrictions, and more vaccine mandates. Doctor Jane Ruby joins us for her first segment of the year. She says she has the receipts to show that vaccine toxicity varies by batch, and it’s possible to find out if the vaccine you’re being pressured to take is from one of the tainted batches. Jane Ruby joins us.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vp9dby