Re: Fauci
Just for the record (because accuracy is very important even generally and on this subject particularly so), Pfizer did not release 55,000 documents. It released 150 documents totaling 55,000 pages. People often, as this man did, say 55,000 documents, not 55,000 pages.
Pursuant to the court order that forced Pfizer to release the first round of these documents, which it wanted to bury in a save-their-sorry-criminal-asses-time capsule for many decades, the court ordered Pfizer to do a rolling production of documents over the next 8 or so months. The next round of production is supposed to be about 80,000 pages. Roll up your sleeves everyone and get to work.
I am working with a group of people, and there are many other groups of people doing this, reviewing and analyzing the documents. It is a mind-numbing process, but it has to be done.
My impression so far is that while there is some interesting and revealing data in these 55,000 pages, much of what one may consider evidence or proof of wrong-doing is subject to interpretations. That is, it can be said, and will be said, that reasonable minds can differ on the meaning of the data. The "experts" on one side of the safety-efficacy-necessity debate will be lined up against the experts on the other side and at the end of the day the decision makers may be no closer to reaching a conclusion, one way or the other, than they are now.
I want to see what Pfizer will not release--even if ordered to do so. That is where the real smoking guns are.