WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Briefly, when Colin Powell died last year, I wrote a little about him. He was a serial war criminal who would have swung at Nuremberg, if his services had been rendered to the Third Reich. Madeleine Albright recently died, who was another war criminal who would have swung. She excelled at doublethink, and she has been receiving similar “eulogies.” She was an acolyte of the Big Zbig, who was another foreign relations criminal. As with Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton, the ascendance of those people simply means that minorities can be war criminals, too, in our land of opportunity.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As I have written, I have been hard at work on my essays. As I worked on my essay on humanity’s Epochal transitions, I decided that I needed a little background before I leapt into the Epochal transitions, and I drafted the below chapter in recent days. I telescoped nearly 14 billion years into a few pages. Accordingly, I could only hit the highlights. The published essay will have links and references. This is just the text.

Best,

Wade

The Journey to Humanity

Half of the original EHJ was devoted to events before humanity appeared on the evolutionary scene. This chapter will greatly condense that tale. However our universe came into being, for what is visible (dark energy and dark matter, which have never been seen, theoretically comprise 95% of our universe), the stars of the show are stars. Stars are enormous fusion reactors, as the gravity that made stars form also forced hydrogen to fuse into helium in the stars’ cores. Stars also create heavier elements during their lives, and at their end, some stars collapse and cataclysmic forces fuse other elements. All naturally occurring elements other than the lightest are believed to have formed from those fusion processes. Some atoms created that way are less stable than others, and they decay into lighter elements (called radioactive decay). That decay liberates subatomic particles and a great amount of energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation (the part that we can see we call light). All currently recognized energy sources in our universe, other than the event(s?) that gave birth to it, come from those processes.

The evidence seems robust to support today’s scientific consensus that Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago (“bya”). Today’s evidence supports the idea that Earth quickly became a water planet, in perhaps less than a quarter-billion years after formation.

How life came into being is an impenetrable mystery to today’s scientists, and the leading hypotheses are little more than inspired guesses. The earliest potential sign of life yet found has been dated to 4.1 bya. If that is true, then life appeared almost as soon as it could on Earth, leading to the idea that life may be relatively common in our universe. I’ll lightly cover the idea that Earth has been visited by denizens of other star systems, and the technology that can usher in the Fifth Epoch may well have been acquired from them. A prominent hypothesis is that life was seeded onto Earth somehow (perhaps Mars), but that does not answer the question of how life originated in our universe. Maybe the ETs or ascended masters have the answer, but this essay will focus on what professional scientists have to say on the matter.

Other than the first life, all life on Earth has had these requirements for existence:

• Acquire enough energy and materials to sustain itself;
• Avoid becoming an energy and material source for other life long enough to successfully reproduce.

Another rising idea among scientists is that everything in our universe may possess consciousness of some sort, which mystics agree with, and perhaps the universe is comprised of consciousness.

The earliest life exploited the potential energy in chemical bonds, in a process known as chemosynthesis. After hundreds of millions of years, some of that chemosynthetic life learned to harness light energy, in a process known as photosynthesis. After hundreds of millions of years of photosynthesis, a solitary organism learned to split water to get the electrons for its photosynthesis, and that organism helped save all life on Earth. That organism’s descendants still constitute the primary energy source for all marine ecosystems, and are called cyanobacteria.

Liberating the oxygen in water created the life-protecting ozone layer and saved Earth’s ocean from escaping into space, as Mars’s did. The oceans also lubricate Earth’s tectonic plates, ensuring the continuance of elemental cycles essential for life on Earth, such as the carbon cycle.

Hundreds of millions of years later, two microbes (a bacterium and an archaean) formed a partnership, and the complex cell was born. Mitochondria are descendants of that collaborating bacterium, and are the energy centers of all animal life, although it would take longer than a billion years after that symbiotic event for the first animals to evolve. Life is a voracious consumer of energy. A human body is 10% mitochondria by weight. Pound-for-pound, complex life burns energy 10,000-to-100,000 times as fast as the Sun produces it.

After a global ice age several hundred million years ago (“mya”), complex cells began the journey to multicellular life, and by the Cambrian Period, complex life formed complex ecosystems. Food chains are primarily energy chains, and other than the photosynthetic organisms near the ocean’s surface, everything else ate everything else, in the “arms race” of the Cambrian Period. That dynamic lasts to this day in our oceans.

All body plans of note (aka “phyla”) appeared by the Cambrian’s end, including that of our ancestors, the first vertebrates. Similar to the act of symbiosis that led to mitochondria, a cyanobacterium formed a partnership that led to plants, and is why our land is green. Green light is the only frequency of visible light that cyanobacteria do not capture. Obviously, plants made it to land before animals did, as plants formed the base of land-based food chains. Plants had about 40 million years of peace before animals began invading. The animal pioneers of land were arthropods, which also dominated the Cambrian ecosystems. Only a handful of phyla adapted to land (including mollusks and worms). Vertebrates were more than 50 million years behind arthropods in invading land, but they soon became the dominant land animals. Fish supplanted arthropods and mollusks as the dominant sea animals, lobe-finned fish lost out to ray-finned fish, and some lobe-fins found refuge and opportunity on land, which led to us.

Land plants were not eager providers of energy and materials for animals, and developed many defensive strategies to fend off animals, including bark, thorns, silicate “rocks” in their bodies, and toxic chemicals. Plants have nervous systems and react when animals eat them, such as producing chemicals that make them unpalatable, which can make one wonder what kind of consciousness plants may possess (their “brains” seem to be in their roots).

Whether it was in the oceans or on land, whether it was microbes, plants, or animals, the essential game was always who gets the energy and who reproduces the most effectively. Those species that lost, either through competition or chemical/physical catastrophes, went extinct, while those that adapted or were lucky survived. The great biological innovations usually arose from ecosystem fringes, in an act of survival, and those marginal creatures often rode their innovations to dominance. Mass extinctions have regularly punctuated the eon of complex life. After each such mass extinction, the resultant ecosystems were dominated by different and often new species, which enjoyed golden ages that were largely free of competition, for a time.

The Sun’s energy output during its lifetime has likely been stable but has slowly increased. Around 2.5 bya, the Sun was 80% as bright as it is today. The carbon cycle is likely the leading factor for temperature variation on Earth. The carbon dioxide from volcanoes adds carbon to the carbon cycle of Earth’s surface, while weathering and deposition are the primary removers of carbon. But when the first forests formed, at the same time that the continents crashed together to form a supercontinent, unique events happened. One was that oxygen levels spiked to the highest levels on Earth that scientists know of, as those trees vented vast amounts of oxygen. That rise in oxygen may have been essential for the vertebrate invasion of land. The other key event was that those forests were buried like no other forests ever were, and they formed nearly all of the coal deposits that humanity mines today. That carbon burial reduced the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide levels so far that it initiated an ice age that destroyed those very same forests. For the past several hundred million years, Antarctica has been at or near the South Pole, and all ice ages over that time began there.

A colder world is a dryer world, and plants adapted by inventing seed reproduction (formerly, all plant reproduction was via spores), while land vertebrates developed eggs that did not need to be laid in water (amniotes). After the Carboniferous rainforest collapse, seed-bearing plants and amniotes dominated terrestrial ecosystems. Complex life usually reproduces sexually, which enables faster evolution, and sexual reproduction is at the root of social behaviors.

Cambrian animals developed organs, including brains, and “intelligence” has been a key dynamic among animals ever since. Among land vertebrates in particular, increasing intelligence was a way for predators to outsmart their prey, for social animals to develop more sophisticated interactions, and display features and behaviors advertised a potential mate’s reproductive fitness. The evolutionary line that led to mammals was dominant before the greatest extinction event ever, about 250 mya, but afterward, archosaurs prevailed while mammals became marginal fringe-dwellers. During the dinosaurs’ reign, some plants invented a new strategy: instead of defending against animals, flowering plants fed them, while using animals to lower the plants’ energetic costs of reproduction. It is the greatest plant/animal symbiosis in the eon of complex life, only rivaled by humanity’s domestication of plants.

The archosaurs’ reign lasted nearly 200 million years before a bolide event wiped nearly all of them out 66 mya (only birds and crocodilians survived), and those marginal mammals soon came to dominate land and sea. Some mammals made the energy-rich tropical canopy their home, and primates were born. Primates, like mammals, were always relatively brainy, which seems to have evolved due to the keen senses required to be marginal animals during the reign of dinosaurs.

Archosaurs dominated a warm Earth, as prodigious volcanic eruptions kept carbon dioxide levels high. About 50 mya, Earth began the cooling trend that resulted in the ice age that we live in today. For billions of years, largely powered by radioactive decay within Earth, the continents have performed a slow dance, as they formed, collided, fragmented, and drifted across Earth’s surface.

Declining volcanism, along with perhaps the increased weathering brought on by the formation of the Himalayan Mountains, as India slammed into Asia, cooled Earth off until Antarctica once again began forming ice sheets. About 20 mya, Africa began to slam into Eurasia, and the family that led to elephants left their African evolutionary home and became the most successful land animals since dinosaurs. There was one other successful migrant from Africa of note: apes. Apes evolved as they left the canopy in a drying African rainforest, and they migrated to Eurasia when the elephant family did. The elephant family beat Africa’s apes to the Americas by more than 15 million years. Those Miocene apes, which lived in Africa and Eurasia, are where I will end this chapter, as they are what humanity arose from. The Epochs of the human journey were about to begin.

[Dennis Leahy]

Hi Wade,

EHJ=Energy and the Human Journey, the beginning of the title of your big essay/novel (for those who wonder what EHJ means) :~)

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Dennis:

At the linked post that I began the post with, I defined EHJ, and anybody with much familiarity with my work knows what it means. The time is coming when I’ll stop referring to it as my “big essay.” At this time, my planned book will have the same title: Energy and the Human Journey. But, it does not hurt to keep defining it!

That Epochal transitions essay may end up being the most succinct version of my work. We’ll see how it turns out. Sketching nearly 14 billion years in a few pages is one way to make it succinct. The other chapters are going to go pretty deeply into each transition, in a way that I felt was too much depth for the big essay. The revised big essay may not be as big as it is today, but we’ll see. My guess is that it will take two years to make those three new essays and revise the big essay. Another year will go into revising my site’s essays to align with them, and another year for the book. That is four years. It might end up being a year less, or maybe a year more. It depends on how my life is going and what the new global catastrophe is. That calendar that Bill leaked a couple of years ago was not too far from the mark.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am working hard on the essays. Really, there is not a lot for me to add on current events. I have written so much on them before, as they are very topical in my work, particularly:

• The “pandemic”;
• The war in Ukraine;
• Global Warming.

Although it was shouted down in the mainstream from the beginning, it indeed seems that the mRNA shots can alter human DNA, and may be wrecking immune systems. COVID-19 may well be an engineered disease. Deaths are skyrocketing around the world among the vaccinated, and the system will never be held accountable, as usual. This is just medical racket, 2.0, but there is nobody in my daily life who understands or wants to, as I witness another great lemming stampede.

In Ukraine, we might avoid a nuclear holocaust, but the media is stumping for one. Ed would have had plenty to write about this situation. It would likely be around how Ukrainians are worthy victims today, and how the entire Nazi connection is being swept under the carpet. The USA loves Nazis, as usual. Refugees are reporting the Nazi atrocities, but the media is never going to give it a fair hearing.

What is happening in Antarctica is surreal these days, far worse and more ominous than what happened in my home state last year, but I continually encounter right-wingers who deny or minimize Global Warming. Last year, when our previous temperature records were obliterated, one pal had a right-wing neighbor who announced that it was just natural variation, as they were experiencing it. My friend was stunned. Human denial can be something to behold. I would not suggest that anybody buy any beachfront property in this century.

It really is incredible, how the left denies the racketeering around this “pandemic,” while the right denies Global Warming. I don’t consider either camp to be truly scientifically literate and worldly, as they grind the axes that align with their self-serving worldviews.

The arrival of the Fifth Epoch ends all of this, but almost nobody on Earth knows or cares in the slightest, as they hack at branches if they hack at all. Truly, are we a sentient species? Hunting for those needles…

Best,

Wade

[kfm27917]

Hi Wade:
Recently saw a Nova documentary about the intelligence of single cell slime mold. Certainly redefins a number of paradigms anout life, intelligence, survival and reproduction.
If U have not yet, I suggest you find it and watch it
https://www.pbs.org/video/secret-mind-of-slime-oa3w89/

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks kfm:

I don’t watch videos much, but am happy to quickly jump around to the articles (1, 2, 3)! I know that the materialist models of consciousness are false, and I alluded to it in my recent chapter draft. Yes, so-called “intelligence” is an interesting topic, and science has barely begun to explore it. In the Fifth Epoch, materialism will go the way of other discarded ideologies. I may mention slime mold intelligence in future essays. Thanks again.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

In days such as these, it is easy to see why Consortium News was Ed’s go-to news site in his last years. Today, I read of the genocide that is taking place in Afghanistan today, courtesy of the USA, as a kind of coup de grâce. This is little different from postwar Indochina. The UK has been carrying our bags for generations, and today is no different. A British “expert” on WMD is flogging for World War III over Ukraine, after rendering his fraudulent services in Syria. He is a WMD expert in the same way that Elliott Abrams is a human rights expert. Ed and Noam wrote a lot about such “experts.”

CNN and the BBC are leading the disinformation campaign on Ukraine, these days (something that CNN excels at), and as I wrote previously, Uncle Joe has now admitted that Russia took the bait in Ukraine. Here comes Cold War 2.0. These are evil times, and my great nation is leading the way. So, I keep writing on it, when I take small breaks from feverishly working on my essays.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

From the beginning, the COVID issue was one of propaganda and censorship. I really had not paid much attention to the medical racket since I wrote my essay a generation ago. I studied vaccination a bit more, had a health revelation when I began eliminating processed food from my diet (again! ), and always knew that capitalism and medicine made very poor bedfellows. The medical racket is all about profits, not health.

Last year, I read books on this “pandemic,” and then I read Lustig’s book, which was an update of Stale Food Versus Fresh Food for me. But, it was not until reading Kennedy’s magnum opus that I realized that medical racket, 2.0, existed, built around phony infectious disease scares, and Big Pharma drugs and vaccines. My estimate of a generation ago, that 80% of what passed for “medicine” in the USA was a fraudulent waste of money, was eerily similar to Lustig’s 75% estimate. Nearly all of what is spent on “medicine” in the USA is simply managing the symptoms of metabolic disease, which comes from the USA’s junk food diet. Big Food creates the addictive substances that generate the patients for Big Pharma, in a closed-loop racket, and the lemmings stampede to their doom. Fauci helped create medical racket, 2.0, and while ignoring chronic disease, which is what kills most Americans and what Fauci was charged by Congress to investigate, Fauci created “pandemics” to keep Big Pharma in the chips, and this so-called “pandemic” was his biggest windfall in a lifetime of graft and corruption. Fauci is Morris Fishbein, 2.0.

I knew that the COVID numbers were rigged from the beginning, and today’s Mercola article, attached, shows how even the CDC is beginning to admit it. Now, the CDC is no longer even collecting COVID death information, so that it can make COVID vanish before the mid-term elections, so that Biden and the Democrats can declare victory. Does it get any more corrupt than that? The entire medical establishment in the USA does not deserve to exist, and the censorship and propaganda hit previously unheard of levels. I no longer have much doubt about eugenics and global tyranny agendas, although the GCs may have little to do with it. This is just what a lust for wealth and power looks like. Bill Gates may or may not be receiving direction for his “philanthropic” efforts. A big problem is that elites even exist, and they will only vanish with the arrival of the Fifth Epoch, when scarcity and fear become dim memories of the human journey. In the Fifth Epoch, love and abundance will reign, not scarcity and fear.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Current events are really cramping my style! I want to ignore Ukraine, but Biden’s unhinged comments this weekend are hard to ignore. I just read this article by Glenn Greenwald, on Biden’s comments. Dr. Strangelove is alive and well in the USA. What insane times to live in, as my great nation leads the way to oblivion. I have to admit that with the “pandemic,” followed by fomenting the war in Ukraine, these might be the last days of the Empire, if we don’t blow the planet up in the meantime. We’ll see.

Back to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have mentioned Chris Hedges quite a bit in my work, and particularly recently, with the Ukraine situation. YouTube just erased all of his shows. The American media resembles the Stalinist media more every day. I’ll never do social media, but I had toyed with the idea of a YouTube channel one day, but I think that I have to let those ideas go. One pal said that a show of mine might last six months on YouTube before the censors erased it. Grim times.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The media always either ignored or lied about Ed and Noam’s Propaganda Model. As Noam said, the media cannot afford to honestly deal with the model, as its implications are fatal to the entire media enterprise. So, the media had to dishonestly transform the hypocrisy around how the media treated East Timor and Cambodia into Noam and Ed’s support for the Khmer Rouge. The Soviet Union played the same trick, turning domestic criticism of the Soviet regime into support for the West. It is a standard tactic, and it does not matter if they were Soviets, Brits, Nazis, or Americans. It is how ruling class propaganda operates.

Ed spent his career as a media analyst making those kinds of comparisons, such as Yugoslavia and Rwanda, the surreal double standards of the use of “genocide,” and so on. Ed would likely be pointing out the double standards of treatment in the Ukrainian war. The American public is receiving a 24/7 propaganda barrage on the war. But even Washington Post is writing about how the Ukrainian military is using civilians as shields, which makes the “war crime” charges against Russia dubious.

Most Americans are now afraid that a nuclear war will break out over Ukraine, and Bumbling Joe Biden is a leading reason for that fear. As Obama once said, “Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up.” To have a clearly demented president at the helm is scary, but Reagan was, too.

The last two years makes the insanity after 9/11 pale to insignificance.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have written plenty on my experiences with and studies of the medical racket. I doubt that I can overemphasize how poorly biology is understood by Western science, and how corrupt Western medicine is. One idea made very clear to me over the years is how poorly Western medicine understands our immune systems. I regard the production of antibodies by vaccines as a kind of gimmick, to show that the medical intervention is “doing something.” It is in good company in Western medicine, with many worthless, deadly, but lucrative medical interventions, that “do something.”

There is a vast amount of evidence (mostly suppressed, of course), that while a vaccine produces antibodies and may prevent an acute reaction, it wrecks the immune system in general, so that it can produce its trick, like a trained circus animal, and leads to all manner of chronic reaction. The way that vaccines work is by producing an autoimmune reaction. Do you think that our skyrocketing autoimmune diseases might have anything to do with it? According to Fauci and friends, there is no relationship, and Fauci also recently called me with a bridge that he wants to sell me.

I write the above as a prelude to today’s Mercola article, attached. It discussed how worthless the boosters are, and how the incessant “boosters” are wrecking the immune systems of those taking them. But that kind of discussion is completely banned in our societies, in these surreal times.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Mercola’s article today is worth some discussion. The problem with conspiracism is that it fosters a paranoid outlook and fact-free opinions. Conspiracists are almost always scientifically illiterate and don’t have a sensible way to approach evidence. QAnon was a perfect example of that, and QAnon did not even die, although most of its adherents finally realized how they were taken for a ride. I periodically hear about the QAnon core’s latest “news,” and it ranks with supermarket tabloids.

That said, there are real conspiracies, and some have global impact, but Donald Trump is the last person that should be looked up to as some sort of hero. JFK was taken out in a conspiracy, as was his brother and others, the GCs are real, but we really landed men on the moon with conventional rocket technology and Earth is spherical, not flat.

There is a medical racket that has been going global for many years, some people at the top are in on it, but as with most situations like this, nearly everybody plays along as they abdicate their sentience and integrity for wealth and “security,” and are easily stampeded over the cliff to their doom.

Attached is today’s Mercola article on the global health dictatorship that Bill Gates and friends are trying to ram through the WHO, and Big Tech is an accomplice, with its rampant censorship and propaganda promotion. Orwell noted long ago that the most pernicious censorship in the West was inflicted by private interests, not governments, and as if to prove him right, his discussion was censored by his book publisher. Noam and Ed’s publishing company was wiped out by its owner to prevent their book’s publication, and Noam has long noted that he could never get any human rights organizations such as the ACLU, or even alternative media, to care about it, because it was not government doing the censoring. We have a similar situation today with Big Tech and the “pandemic” (and now Russia), but because they are officially doing it on behalf of the government, it is a First Amendment issue, which, of course, the media is ignoring.

Mercola’s article today is about how the WHO is being used to ram though a treaty to undermine national sovereignty over disease treatment, in a global medical dictatorship. In ways, this is no different from NAFTA and other “free trade” agreements, and the threat is real. But I have little faith that this will be stopped. The masses are too asleep, and the forces of evil are too active, but we’ll see if this can be stopped. Kennedy’s book covered the territory of Mercola’s article. Dark times.

Best,

Wade

[Dennis Leahy]

Mercola has been heroic in standing up to the pharma coup, however... I find it odd that Mercola has chosen to support a couple of the pharma sector's lies: the herd immunity concept, which is pseudo-scientific hogwash, and attributing at least a partial immunity to the jabs, when the mRNA technology covid jab juice wasn't even designed to prevent infection and transmission (immunity.) Stating that something is "less effective now" is stating that it was "more effective before", when - in truth - it was never effective in preventing infection or transmission. As far as I can tell, all the claims that the covid jabs provide immunity and even hamper much less stop transmission have been a product of the fascist collusion between the US government and the Global Corporate Network's corporate mass media (that are allowed to lie with impunity.) Of course, the directive to mainstream corporate media to obfuscate and manipulate with lies, and the buzzwords and bogus concepts are emanating from the think-tanks of the pharma sector of the GCN, but covertly, rather than overtly.

I am not sure what to make of these issues, when Mercola has provided so much factual scientific information, why acquiesce to pieces of the covert narrative? There is no such thing as herd immunity - it's just a statistic, and any individual animal only reduces its likelihood of infection when surrounded by others with acquired immunity to a pathogen. That individual has acquired no actual immunity at all from the herd. Zero. It's beyond disingenuous to use the term "herd immunity", it's criminal, as it is a major weapon in their assault on truth and a foundational lie they use to build policy from.

I don't know if my thoughts on this were worth interrupting your flow, Wade, but I'm curious whether these inconsistencies have you scratching your head as well. Mercola should have debunked the pseudoscience behind "herd immunity" and should have questioned every government or media conflating statement that mentions getting immunity from covid-19 or stopping transmission of covid-19, by getting jabbed.

I'm not trying to "demote" Mercola, just the bogus concepts that he has allowed onto his truth wagon.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Dennis:

Oh boy, there are scientifically trained people in my circles who think that the entire germ theory is bogus, and there may be something to that. You and I have mixed it up over Noam, who buys orthodox medicine, almost in its entirely. To Noam’s credit, he has stated that drug researchers really don’t understand the underlying biology very well, but just concoct something and try it out. I could not get Ed interested in meeting Brian, and Ed acknowledged to me that he neglected the connection between energy and economy. I agree that under the germ theory, so-called herd immunity only reduces the chance of infection. Mercola has taken on the idea of the COVID-19 vaccines’ reducing transmission, so I don’t know where you are getting your information from. What appears to be the case, however, is that if you get the jab, it will reduce the symptoms of getting COVID. That seems to be its only virtue, but it comes with one hell of a price, which I have written on plenty. Mercola certainly is not promoting jabs.

For me, the issue with Noam, or Ed, or Mercola, or so many others out there who are worth listening to, is that they are all human, with only so many hours in a day and years in a life, and they have to choose their battles. There is nobody on Earth who has it all together on all subjects. As my pal Steve Meyers said, take the best and leave the rest.

For me, the issue is that so many issues do not get fair hearings, and one of my upcoming essays deals with that. In our world of scarcity and fear, nearly everybody is trying to butter their bread and grinding their axes, irrespective of what the truth might be. The only solution that I see is the end of scarcity and fear, and only the arrival of the Fifth Epoch will do that. Until then, the rackets roll along. I don’t see any of the rackets dying before the Fifth Epoch arrives. They are simply too dug in, and almost everybody plays along, with varying levels of complicity and enthusiasm.

I generally don’t buy the conspiracist take that Noam is a Left Gatekeeper, for instance, or that somebody like Mercola is some kind of agent for Big Pharma, or that Trump is the shining knight on a white steed who will save the world!

There is nobody in my pantheon that I agreed on all issues with, and I don’t expect anybody to agree with me on everything. We all have our journeys and points of view. I learn from my pals, they learn from me, and on some issues, we agree to disagree. For me, the issue is how we all pursue our quest for the truth. Our awareness is all that we take with us. Are we self-serving, or other-serving? That is the important issue, for me, not where anybody is with any one position. We all should have the right to be wrong, and be willing to change our minds if the evidence warrants it, and the evidence of experience is always the best kind. The censorship and propaganda these days is something to behold, and I sympathize with anybody who thinks that the global elites are near their end-game of creating a global tyranny, but the issue is what to do about it. For my entire career, I saw people who decided to bail rather than patch the hull (also called hacking at branches).

I have written and will continue to write that energy is the ballgame, and everything else is noise. I am trying to refine and simplify my message, to make it easier to understand, and then I will be engaging in more visibility work.

So, yes, is Mercola the ideal spokesman for alternative medicine and challenging the medical racket? No, and neither is Kennedy, and neither am I. We all do what we can, and we all see dimly through the dark glass of our reality. It is the attempt to see that is always worthy.

Love you, Bro,

Wade

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi Dennis:

Oh boy, there are scientifically trained people in my circles who think that the entire germ theory is bogus, and there may be something to that. You and I have mixed it up over Noam, who buys orthodox medicine, almost in its entirely. To Noam’s credit, he has stated that drug researchers really don’t understand the underlying biology very well, but just concoct something and try it out. I could not get Ed interested in meeting Brian, and Ed acknowledged to me that he neglected the connection between energy and economy. I agree that under the germ theory, so-called herd immunity only reduces the chance of infection. Mercola has taken on the idea of the COVID-19 vaccines’ reducing transmission, so I don’t know where you are getting your information from. What appears to be the case, however, is that if you get the jab, it will reduce the symptoms of getting COVID. That seems to be its only virtue, but it comes with one hell of a price, which I have written on plenty. Mercola certainly is not promoting jabs.

For me, the issue with Noam, or Ed, or Mercola, or so many others out there who are worth listening to, is that they are all human, with only so many hours in a day and years in a life, and they have to choose their battles. There is nobody on Earth who has it all together on all subjects. As my pal Steve Meyers said, take the best and leave the rest.

For me, the issue is that so many issues do not get fair hearings, and one of my upcoming essays deals with that. In our world of scarcity and fear, nearly everybody is trying to butter their bread and grinding their axes, irrespective of what the truth might be. The only solution that I see is the end of scarcity and fear, and only the arrival of the Fifth Epoch will do that. Until then, the rackets roll along. I don’t see any of the rackets dying before the Fifth Epoch arrives. They are simply too dug in, and almost everybody plays along, with varying levels of complicity and enthusiasm.

I generally don’t buy the conspiracist take that Noam is a Left Gatekeeper, for instance, or that somebody like Mercola is some kind of agent for Big Pharma, or that Trump is the shining knight on a white steed who will save the world!

There is nobody in my pantheon that I agreed on all issues with, and I don’t expect anybody to agree with me on everything. We all have our journeys and points of view. I learn from my pals, they learn from me, and on some issues, we agree to disagree. For me, the issue is how we all pursue our quest for the truth. Our awareness is all that we take with us. Are we self-serving, or other-serving? That is the important issue, for me, not where anybody is with any one position. We all should have the right to be wrong, and be willing to change our minds if the evidence warrants it, and the evidence of experience is always the best kind. The censorship and propaganda these days is something to behold, and I sympathize with anybody who thinks that the global elites are near their end-game of creating a global tyranny, but the issue is what to do about it. For my entire career, I saw people who decided to bail rather than patch the hull (also called hacking at branches).

I have written and will continue to write that energy is the ballgame, and everything else is noise. I am trying to refine and simplify my message, to make it easier to understand, and then I will be engaging in more visibility work.

So, yes, is Mercola the ideal spokesman for alternative medicine and challenging the medical racket? No, and neither is Kennedy, and neither am I. We all do what we can, and we all see dimly through the dark glass of our reality. It is the attempt to see that is always worthy.

Love you, Bro,

Wade

Hi Wade, In the second to the last Mercola article you linked, "The Boosters Stop Boosting after 4 Months", besides the title itself, see this example: "COVID-19 booster shots lose effectiveness rapidly, with protection plummeting by thefourth month post-shot.

Protection? Protection from what? Infection is implied.

They provide no protection from immunity. The word "protection" is loaded, and loaded with a nefarious narrative to equate jabs with both immunity and transmissibility, neither of which are affected.

I am not hoisting Mercola's head up on a pike. I'm saying that this is a clumsy and ill-advised way to debunk the mainstream narrative when he uses their language with its twisted implications to try to explain that they are wrong. Boosters never boosted anything (but profits), so why acquiesce to the false narrative that they DO provide protection against immunity and transmissibility by comparing what boosters used to be thought to do with what boosters actually do? My sword is sheathed, Mercola is a hero, but he is wrong to ever have used the phrase "herd immunity" as a serious subject in his writings, and wrong to pretend that protection is real but not as robust as was thought. The word "protection" should never be used in the context of the covid-19 jabs without specifying that "protection" means that (since you had no immunity, even "vaccinated") once you catch covid-19, the symptoms will be less severe. If the covid-19 "vaccine" makers designed and manufactured and deployed a "pre-treatment" that confers NO protection from infection and transmission, then it is a huge mistake to keep using the obviously disingenuous word "protection" to describe it.

Chomsky's head also doesn't being on a pike, even though he was obviously used to get the "liberal" stamp of approval on the USA, Inc. militarily and by sanctions, crushing of Syria and Assad, on the NPR show with Amy Bad-Goodman. He was an all-star for the bad guys that day. He acted as a left gatekeeper that day, whether he is aware of it or not. I don't think he is evil, and believe that he could pass a polygraph test that he believed what he was saying. But, unlike a Catholic confessional, I won't pretend that it didn't happen or absolve him because he said 3 Hail Mary's or because he helped to expose the bad guys' propaganda techniques in the past.

I am not trying to find flawless humans to follow - there are none, and sure as hell none when I look in the mirror. When good guys do bad things, my response is to examine and analyze the bad things, not gloss over them because I'm worried that their halo won't shine as brightly after pointing out personal defects or defective thoughts and ideas. I was trying to put a couple of Mercola's "defective thoughts" on the table, and wondered if you had noticed the same or not.

Love you too, bro!

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Dennis:

I suppose that if somebody was not familiar with Mercola’s work, they could think that his “protection” meant protection from transmission and infection, but he never used it that way that I ever saw. Maybe he could have used “benefit,” but I have no problem with his “protection.”

On Noam, he does not hold any national leaders in high esteem, being the anarchist that he is, and that includes Assad, who is a butcher (but yes, his father was worse, but all Middle East leaders have been, it comes with the territory, like being the American president ). That can’t be credibly denied, just as Noam called out Putin for invading Ukraine, no matter what his rationales were (and I am well aware of how the USA goaded him, and Putin may well have “taken the bait,” just as the Soviet Union did with Afghanistan).

As far his Democracy Now! appearance goes, I fault Amy Goodman more for that, as she followed the media’s agenda. I think that she has lost her way a bit, as she is beholden to her sponsors, and at $1 million a year in salary, the last I knew long ago, it is easy to get compromised.

Now that we are discussing Noam, I have plenty of disagreement with him on issues, and maybe the biggest one is his denial that the CIA would have had any motivation to take out JFK. They had plenty of motivation, the CIA was deeply involved, and at best, Dulles covered up the CIA’s involvement. But, in the end, it pretty much does not matter, as my point on the JFK hit is that our government has not been legitimate since then, and Noam would not strenuously disagree.

Hang in there,

Wade

[onawah]

I definitely agree, Dennis. I often post Dr. Mercola's articles in their entirety here on the forum, but not those with what I also consider to be Mercola's "defective thinking".
It's very disappointing, especially in comparison to his usual cutting edge views.
I wonder if he is making an attempt to court the agreement of those who are still wavering on the vaccine issues as a whole, but if so, it's just not worth the damage it does to his integrity.

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)

I am not trying to find flawless humans to follow - there are none, and sure as hell none when I look in the mirror. When good guys do bad things, my response is to examine and analyze the bad things, not gloss over them because I'm worried that their halo won't shine as brightly after pointing out personal defects or defective thoughts and ideas. I was trying to put a couple of Mercola's "defective thoughts" on the table, and wondered if you had noticed the same or not.

Love you too, bro!

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Back when we were on the receiving end of the media’s lies for years, I had no idea what lied ahead of me, studying the media since 1990, becoming Ed’s biographer, etc. In the past two years, with COVID and now Ukraine, the media has reached unprecedented levels of propaganda and censorship, and I am kind of glad that Ed did not live to see it. The media has warmongered since the 1800s, so the media’s stumping for nuclear war today is no great surprise.

If there is a silver lining to it all, more Americans than ever are awakening to how the media is a big lie machine. Journalists are one of the least trusted professions in the USA today. At the very bottom were car salespeople and politicians. It was “nice” to see judges near the bottom of the barrel, too. Globally, journalists and politicians are the least trusted.

But, I don’t expect some kind of big awakening of the public at large that can be utilized to usher in the Fifth Epoch. I continue to see it as a pretty small group that will make it happen. Awakening to the media’s lies is only part of the process. A bigger, more radical, awakening is needed for what I have in mind.

Best,

Wade