Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[Kryztian]

Posted by happyuk (here)

Also gone are the few remaining vaccine mandates, for workers and inbound travellers. Tests on arrival in New Zealand are no longer required but encouraged.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-covid-changes

If I read this correctly, I no longer need vaccination to enter the country. Without wishing to sound too smug, for me it represents a big two fingers held high to all those gutless naysayers who said I'd never be able to travel.

Here's the announcement from Jacinda Ardern herself that all mandates are lifted

I had to laugh at her final words: "We all need to respect everyone's individual decisions." That's a bit like hearing "We all need to respect individuals regardless of their race or religion" from Adolf Hitler.

[norman]

from The Guardian

What’s behind the mystery of thousands of excess deaths this summer?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/med...d93ad2e2591db1


Devi Sridhar
Over the past couple of months, deaths in England and Wales have been higher than would be expected for a typical summer. In July and August, there were several weeks with deaths 10% to 13% above the five-year average, meaning that in England about 900 extra people a week were dying compared with the past few years.




The leading causes of death are within the typical range (the five-year average): heart and lung diseases, cancers, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Covid-19 deaths could account for half of the excess mortality, but the other half is puzzling, as there’s no one clear reason that jumps out.

It’s likely to be a mix of factors: Covid is making us sicker and more vulnerable to other diseases (research suggests it may contribute to delayed heart attacks, strokes, and dementia); an ageing population; an extremely hot summer; and an overloaded health service meaning that people are dying from lack of timely medical care. This winter, the cost of living crisis and concerns about fuel poverty will add to these contributory factors, given the links between deprivation and ill health. So we may see these excess death numbers continue.

Related: Record 6.8m people waiting for hospital treatment in England


The excess mortality puzzle has been weaponised by some to argue that this is a delayed consequence of lockdown. In essence, this is to say that mandatory restrictions on mixing and stay-at-home legal orders, as well as turning the NHS into a Covid health service during the first and second waves of infection, prevented people from being diagnosed or treated for other conditions such as cancer, heart disease, or even depression – and that those long-hidden conditions are now killing people.

Of course, some medical care suffered during the pandemic, and delayed diagnosis leads to poor health outcomes. But to say that not having restrictions would have solved this problem is naive. Restrictions ultimately limited the number of people hospitalised for Covid-19 at any one time, so that the health services could cope with these numbers. Healthcare is finite: the best way to preserve resources for non-Covid conditions was to keep Covid infections as low as possible.

Given the English government’s delay in responding to Covid-19 and implementing measures to suppress it in the first and second waves, the NHS struggled to provide high-quality care to all those who arrived in hospital. Countries that managed to avoid large numbers of Covid-19 patients in the pre-vaccine era through smart suppression based on testing and isolation, such as New Zealand and South Korea, managed to keep their health services running for a wider range of conditions. England took the path of late, and thus longer, lockdowns without a clear exit strategy, and a failing test/trace/isolate system.

The excess mortality data points to three key issues. The first is that the NHS is overloaded, quality of care is suffering, staff are burnt-out and leaving their positions, and this is leading to medical care being delayed for acute conditions (heart attacks and strokes) but also chronic ones, where every week and month matters, such as cancer treatment and surgeries. Too many ambulances are unable to offload.

Unfortunately, certain politicians have turned to blaming NHS staff for being lazy and only doing virtual appointments, or being off work with illness. What’s clear is that we need real investment in the NHS, in its people, facilities and operations, so that it is an attractive place to work that can provide the volume and quality of care needed.

Second, Office for National Statistics data has shown that mortality jumped on days with extreme heat. We know extreme weather events are becoming more common, and that higher temperatures can lead to strokes, heart attacks and blood clotting in elderly and vulnerable groups. This problem is not going away as climate experts warn that what we see as unusually hot temperatures will become the norm over the next 50 years.

But most importantly: Covid-19 is still circulating and killing people, especially those in elderly groups and those who are unvaccinated. While it has dropped from being the leading cause of death, it is still one of the top 10 causes of death in the population, and even with a much-reduced fatality rate due to vaccination and prior infection, it is contributing to that 10-13% jump in summer excess mortality. In fact, as these figures show from the ONS, many other major causes of death are slightly below the five-year average.

The good news is that the fatality rate for Covid-19 – the chance of death when infected – is now below seasonal flu for the vast majority of people. This is because of scientific developments and the efforts by governments to delay the spread of Covid-19 until vaccinations could be rolled out. The bad news is that it’s still a cause of disability and death, alongside heart disease, cancer, dementia and other challenges.

Instead of illogical arguments about whether lockdown was responsible for excess mortality – entirely without evidence – it’s worth taking a closer look at the data, which suggests that, in fact, it’s a mix of the new burden of Covid-19 and an overloaded health service, with days of extreme heat thrown in.

As always, a clearer picture will emerge with more research and analysis over time. For now, we should be focusing on how to develop better treatments and vaccines to bring the mortality rate of Covid-19 down further, investing in the NHS to ensure quality and timely care, and looking at how to better cope with extreme weather events. Global events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and climate change are making us all sicker. If we could just acknowledge their impact across political lines, we could work together on solutions.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/chrismartenson/s...LREx8GCJABdczw

full image

[ExomatrixTV]

• DC Director Admits Agency Gave False Info:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mQbzHMdl-4o

[norman]

British government quietly BANS covid jabs for children under 12 while U.S. government still pushing shots on BABIES

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-...ildren-12.html





With no fanfare or public announcement, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) in the United Kingdom has decided that covid “vaccines” should no longer be given to children under 12 years of age.

As government officials in the United States continue to push the jabs on young children and even babies, British authorities now feel as though there is little-to-no risk of tiny tots catching covid.

According to the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the government policy of administering covid jabs to children aged 5-11 was “only ever meant to be temporary.”

“This one-off programme applies to those aged 5 to 11 years, including those who turn five years of age before the end of August 2022,” reads the UKHSA’s “Green Book,” which contains information about the jab rollout for use by public health professionals.

“Subject to further clarification, on-going eligibility in 2022 / 23, after the one-off programme, is expected to be for children in the academic years where children are aged 11 or 12 years,” the Green Book further reads. (Related: Pfizer’s mRNA [messenger RNA] covid injection recently triggered a massive hepatitis outbreak among children throughout the U.K.)

Covid vaccines haven’t just been discontinued for little ones in the UK: They’re technically BANNED

The wording used by the UKHSA is a bit confusing, making it seem as though the shots have merely been discontinued for use in children under 12. It turns out that the shots are actually banned, meaning it is now a crime to jab pre-teens for the Fauci Flu.

“I just wanted to post a quick note because, in many places and news media, this news is not described properly,” wrote Igor Chudov on his Substack. “People mention this program as being ‘discontinued.’ That benign sounding description is not quite exactly correct.”

“The correct statement is that in the UK, Covid vaccines were just BANNED for all children under 12. Not a single UK child under 12 is allowed to get any doses of Covid vaccines.”

The only exception to the new rule is children who are deemed to be “severely immunocompromised.”

In a statement following the rule change, health freedom activist Dr. Naomi Wolf praised the decision. She explained in an interview on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” program that Chinese Virus shots damage the reproductive ability of young children, potentially ruining their bodies for life.

“The vaccines hurt the testes and hurt the parts of the testes that develop the masculinity and secondary sex characteristics of little boys, and baby boys, and teenage boys,” Wolf explained.

“So they literally harm the chances of your little boy child to grow up normally as a male human adult.”

In the comment section, one person was not as thrilled by the decision – not because it was a bad one necessarily, but because it is “too little, too late.”

“What do I think? Off with their heads!” this person added, along with a screenshot of an article from The Exposé pointing out that ever since Fauci Flu shots were introduced, there has been a massive increase in excess deaths among children across Europe.

“Official mortality figures for Europe show that there has been a shocking 691% increase in excess deaths among children since the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine for use in children aged 12 to 15 in May,” the Exposé article explains.

“Before this decision by the European Medicines Agency, deaths among children in 2021 were below the expected rate. But following the emergency use authorisation, excess deaths among children by the end of the year had risen by a deeply troubling 1,599% compared to the 2017 to 2020 average.”

[mountain_jim]

have not verified this - just saw

[norman]

CDC now says covid jabs causing myocarditis isn’t “misinformation” after all, after YEARS of Big Tech censorship for those who said it first

https://www.newstarget.com/2022-09-1...formation.html





The latest data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that so-called “vaccines” for covid germs come with an exceptionally high risk of myocarditis, pericarditis and other related heart inflammation troubles.

Contrary to what CDC mouthpieces like Rochelle Walensky have been saying, it is not “misinformation” to say that the shots cause cardiovascular damage. They clearly do, as the data speaks for itself.

The most damaging injection appears to be Pfizer’s mRNA (messenger RNA) variety, which in the 16-17 age category for males results in 71.5 cases of myopericarditis per million injected after the second dose. In the 12-15 age category for males, the figure was 42.6 cases per million injected.

Moderna’s mRNA shot was not much better, causing the same condition in 37.7 young men per million between the ages of 18 and 24 after the second dose. The 12-15 age group of young men was not calculated. (Related: A peer-reviewed JAMA paper written by CDC scientists found that Chinese Virus injections trigger myocarditis at much higher rates than the government is officially letting on.)

Rates of myopericarditis in “fully vaccinated” women, comparatively, are next to null, suggesting that these bioweapon injections specifically target male physiology.

“When reports first surfaced in 2021 that some cases of myocarditis – the inflammation of the heart muscle, potentially leading to blood clots and heart attack or stroke – were potentially associated with the Covid-19 vaccine, the corporate media and its fact-checkers were quick to label them as misinformation, saying the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh its small risks,” reported The Federalist.

Three-to-five times more young men are being heart-harmed by covid jabs than what the CDC was reporting this time last year

Matt Shapiro added to this sentiment on his Substack, writing that “last year’s misinformation on vaccine-associated myocarditis in young men is this year’s well-established fact.”

“The rates of dose 2 myocarditis are 3-5 times higher for young men than what the CDC was reporting this time last year. For comparison, this is what was presented in the ACIP meeting this time last year.”

Also almost a year ago, European researchers published a study stating exactly what the CDC is now reluctantly admitting. Tracy Høeg, Allison Kruf, Josh Stevenson and John Mandrola found that myocarditis is, in fact, a serious risk factor post-injection – especially for men.

“This study was a canary in the coal mine in the debate about whether or not the COVID vaccine should be recommended for young men,” Shapiro further writes.

“With rates of myocarditis this high and the severity of COVID as low as it is for this age group, the case in favor of the vaccine for this age group is not strong. These results are why countries across Europe suspended the Moderna vaccine for men under 30.”

The results of that study, as tweeted by Høeg, can be viewed below:

Keep in mind that anyone who dared to share this information last year was immediately convicted by the social media gods of spreading “misinformation.” Now, that same misinformation reflects the official data published by the CDC.

“Big Tech used these so-called fact-checks to censor good-faith Americans, dissenting medical experts, and even lawmakers who questioned the CDC’s vaccinations-for-all narrative,” Shapiro says.

In the comment section, someone else added that there are a “lot of quiet ‘mea culpas” going on lately,” meaning admissions of guilt by government agencies that are mostly flying under the radar.

The latest news about unsafe and ineffective Fauci Flu shots can be found at VaccineInjuryNews.com.

[norman]

Whilst you were distracted by the Battle for Ukraine, Documents were published confirming Moderna created the Covid-19 Virus

Evidence has emerged which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Covid-19 virus was created by the very pharmaceutical giant that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection; Moderna.

https://expose-news.com/2022/03/14/d...created-covid/


. . . more and links at link above.

PDF version




The New American

VIDEO: Moderna Lawsuit Against Pfizer May Unmask Details of Covid Origin

https://www.brighteon.com/9a5281ed-6...1-052718ff06b9

[24 mins]

[norman]

NEJM study confirms that covid jabs destroy natural immunity

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-...-immunity.html


Within the first few months following “vaccination” for covid, a new study has found, a person’s immune system degrades to the point of developing negative immunity.

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) published the disturbing paper, which looked at 887,193 children aged five to 11 in North Carolina, 30.8 percent (273,157) of whom received at least one dose of Pfizer’s mRNA (messenger RNA) shot between Nov. 1, 2021, and June 3, 2022.

Using a form of statistical modeling that carefully adjusts for confounding factors such as underlying health conditions, scientists determined that the shots fail rather quickly post-injection and eventually eat away at immunity in a manner similar to AIDS – hence why many now refer to post-injection immune degradation as vaccine-induced AIDS, or VAIDS.

The shots not only failed to provide protection for the children after just a few short months, but they also left the children in worse immune shape overall. (Related: Natural immunity, not vaccine-induced “immunity,” is the way to go for long-term health.)

The study’s authors wrote that even though covid injections appear to “confer considerable immunity against Omicron infection,” they only do so for a few months, if that (supposedly). After that, the shots result in a “rapid decline in protection” that eventually turns the immune system against itself.

“This is very disturbing because it suggests not only that the vaccines give negative ‘protection’ after a few months but also that they destroy the protection that should have been provided by natural immunity,” reported the Daily Sceptic about the study.

“The unvaccinated keep their protection from previous infection but the vaccinated end up with negative efficacy even if they’ve been previously infected. This means the vaccines appear to demolish a person’s natural immunity and leave him or her more vulnerable to infection than he or she was before.”

bioRxiv study finds that mRNA covid jabs damage adaptive immunity against other diseases, too

The NEJM study establishes the fact that covid injections damage innate immunity against covid, but what about the other pathogens?

Another related study published at bioRxiv, “The Preprint Server for Biology,” reveals that mRNA shots damage both innate and adaptive immunity in general, regardless of the disease.

Describing Fauci Flu shots as “highly inflammatory” with “a long in vivo half-life,” the bioRxiv study emphasizes that mRNA spike proteins cause chronic inflammation, which some would argue is the underlying cause behind all diseases and the health damage they cause – including early death.

“We found that pre-exposure to mRNA-LNPs or LNP alone led to long-term inhibition of the adaptive immune responses, which could be overcome using standard adjuvants,” the study explains.

One of the diseases looked at specifically was Candida albicans. Covid injections were found to diminish resistance to this fungal illness, resulting in a “general decrease in blood neutrophil percentages.”

“In summary, the mRNA-LNP vaccine platform induces long-term unexpected immunological changes affecting both adaptive immune responses and heterologous protection against infections,” that study concluded.

In the comment section, someone remarked that it is hardly a surprise that these experimental gene modification cocktails are damaging people’s immune systems, seeing as how they were never even safety tested.

“Their fear that they messed up people’s immune systems and therefore have to keep stabbing them is the only ‘positive’ explanation for why they continue pumping this poison into people,” wrote another.

“This is criminal negligence territory. Eventually lawyers and judges will awake from their trance – many of them and their family were poked, many of them will eventually put 2 and 2 together – the ensuing pulverisation of the health authorities and ‘scientists’ that perpetrated this will be epic. And it will come.”

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/sta...eN7bHYpZpT0wJg

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...tners-00053969


How Bill Gates and partners used their clout to control the global Covid response — with little oversight

Four health organizations, working closely together, spent almost $10 billion on responding to Covid across the world. But they lacked the scrutiny of governments, and fell short of their own goals, a POLITICO and WELT investigation found.

< rest at link >

[Delight]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/sta...eN7bHYpZpT0wJg

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...tners-00053969


How Bill Gates and partners used their clout to control the global Covid response — with little oversight

Four health organizations, working closely together, spent almost $10 billion on responding to Covid across the world. But they lacked the scrutiny of governments, and fell short of their own goals, a POLITICO and WELT investigation found.

< rest at link >

It all leads up in the article to

MORE need for government control because WE WILL HAVE ANOTHER PANDEMIC.

This is propaganda....

[mountain_jim]

Well it is Politico - you expect that from them, though supposedly they were going to be more unbiased under new ownership.

[Michel Leclerc]

Posted by norman (here)
NEJM study confirms that covid jabs destroy natural immunity

(...)

One of the diseases looked at specifically was Candida albicans. Covid injections were found to diminish resistance to this fungal illness, resulting in a “general decrease in blood neutrophil percentages.”

(...)

Long time no see, dear Candida albicans! When my friend Luc got “HIV infected” in 1986, one of the first real symptoms of his immunity breaking down was the onset of Candida albicans on his tongue. Soon enough, in Belgium at least, when “gay” men noticed "something" on their tongue, they had themselves checked only to find that they were doomed... until our charming Dr. Sickle got his AZT on the market. AZT and its ensuing “improved”, “more patient-friendly” therapies slowly transformed the person into some sort of mutant, who would end up losing the battle anyway – after years, decades maybe, a shortened life.

Thirty-five years later: "another portion please".

[Delight]

I don't know about anyone else, but I am absolutely very confused by the vitriol aimed from "my side" of the alt health movement toward more "mainstream" MDs who are trying to stop the jab but still are traditional in some ways. I HATE the term "controlled opposition" which can be aimed at anyone (Alex Jones and EVERYONE). I am reminded of Bill's quote that "kindness is a super power".

I am concerned after recent hearings that Judy Mikovits is in a bad mental/emotional place. I am praying for all of us. We need it!

More Fever Swamp
When will they ever learn (to do their research before popping off with conspiracies)?

Robert W Malone MD, MS
Sep 19

“Welcome to the fever swamp”
Steve Bannon, in response to my briefing him on recent attacks describing me as controlled opposition.

ad hominem
Related to Ad hominum: Argumentum ad hominem

ad hom·i·nem

(hŏm′ə-nĕm′, -nəm) adj.1. Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument: The candidates agreed to focus on the issues rather than making ad hominem attacks against each other.

2. Appealing to the emotions rather than to logic or reason.

Another week gone, another Sunday Strip posted. Still the book editing is not finished. Last Thursday, a two hour broadcast to Vienna talking about the state of the world and COVID, with a specific case study concerning MonkeyPox Fearporn. Friday Jill and I flew out to Las Vegas, departing for Dulles airport at 0500h EST. Up Saturday at 0500h PST to hit another broadcast to the Better Way conference in Vienna, wherein I focused on the fact that we are in the middle of a global, unrestricted media and information war, and provided coaching to the effect that our opponents believe that the end justifies the means, and to not expect them to recognize any legal or ethical boundaries. Then off to the large corporate training meeting which was the purpose of the travel, and spoke with Jeffrey Tucker and Candice Owens on the Administrative State, modern media control, censorship, and all that.

Below was one interesting take on the meeting, which speaks volumes.

“Yesterday I spoke at a convention of 600-plus finance professionals. All their lives were profoundly affected by lockdowns. They seemed very excited to hear my message. I asked the crowd how many had heard of the Great Barrington Declaration. Only 6 hands went up. It's a good reminder to me of how far we have to go. We think we have reached multitudes but the reality is that we are nowhere near that point. 99% of people have no idea that there was another way.”

Two of those six hands were mine and Jill’s.

After the meeting, having been up since 0500h, Jill and I retired to our room and ordered falafels delivered for dinner, as Vegas was jammed this weekend and Jill and I just did not want to deal with crowds. The falafels were truly horrible. Living large! Finally, a full nights sleep, got up, got the Sunday Strip composed and posted. Both of us feeling more calm, rested, relaxed than usual.

And then more fever swamp crazy arrived in the email in-box from Denmark.

From: Martin Wendelboe <m.wendelboe@xxx>
Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:14 AM
Subject: Dr. Judy Mikovits questioning the truthfulness of Dr. Robert Malone
To: <delbigtree@xxx>, <me>
Cc: <drjudy@therealdrjudy.com>

Dear Del Bigtree and Dr. Robert Malone (cc: Dr. Judy Mikovits)

I subscribe to Dr. Judy Mikovits’ newsletter. In her latest there is a link to a video clip with the following notes: QUOTE: "Recently on The Clay Clark Thrive Time Show on September 11, I asked Dr Robert Malone 5 questions, such as how many bioweapons have you been funded to develop?" UNQUOTE

Following the link you get to this video clip with the headline:Dr Peter Breggin & Doctor Judy Mikovits Ask,- Is Doctor Robert Malone Part of NIH ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines)?- Who is Doctor Robert Malone?

https://rumble.com/v1jn8xy-doctor-ro...ource=omnisend

And with links to this site: https://breggin.com/Threats-from-the...Mass-Psychosis accusing Dr. Malone and Prof. Desmet of being trojan horses.

Can any of you explain what is going on? Why is Judy Mikovits all of a sudden attacking Dr. Malone? I thought you were all on the same page supporting each other in getting the truth out and end this deroute towards The Great Reset and all that nonsense.And I wonder what Mikki Willis has to say about this (I haven't’ got his e-mail)… One day he is making the Plandemic block buster documentaries featuring Dr. Mikovits. The next day he is about to release a new (I guess block buster) featuring Dr. Malone. THIS IS NOT IN ANYBODIES INTERREST AT ALL.

I guess Dr. Mikovits has the phone number to Dr. Malone—so why not just call him instead of participating like that in a talkshow.Now, you could say that these are all questions for Dr. Judy Mikovits. Well, you could be right but I really would appreciate if the two of you could ask her some of these questions directly and then get together, all three og you, live on The High Wire to sort this out. Because NOW I DON’T KNOW WHO TO TRUST !

Most kindly

Martin Wendelboe

Copenhagen, Denmark

So much for spending a peaceful, relaxing morning with my wife before packing up and jumping on another Airbus back home, to arrive late at night on a Sunday. Sound like your idea of a good time? I mean, really. I am developing a new appreciation for Greta Garbo.

Then this further slice of happiness arrives:

From: Dr Judy <drjudy@therealdrjudy.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: Dr. Judy Mikovits questioning the truthfulness of Dr. Robert Malone
To: Martin Wendelboe <m.wendelboe@xxx>
Cc: delbigtree@xxx <delbigtree@xxx>, <me>, Mikki Willis <MIKKI.WILLIS@xxx>

Dear Dr Martin

I’m not attacking Dr Malone (or anyone else)

I’m asking for transparency and data as I always have)

There are not sick people behind this website.

We are simply attempting to get transparency.

Dr Malone published his CV showing 2011-2016 particopation in grants as a “capture manager” receiving billions of dollars in grants from DARPA and other military organizations for bioweapons programs HIV ZiKa. Ebola etc 2011-2016

As physicians Drs Malone McCullough and Joey should know purinerguc modulators (ivermectin Suramin and dozens of other therapeutics developed since the discovery of purinergic modulation of the immune system brain and lungs work done since Geoffrey Burnstock published in 1972.

I have presented peer reviewed clinicla studies since 2011 when our 2009 science paper showed disease association of xmrvs and exiting solutions.. drugs HCQ,Suramin, ivermectin and many others.. dine I was jailed and my life’s work censored

Perhaps they did not know at the beginning of the Plandemic But they certainly knew in 2020 when millions were denied and murders these lifesaving proven safe drugs for now decades and in the case of Suramin a century!!
My husband and daughter in law were murdered she denied ivermectin for cancer

My husband absolutely immune simply starved and tortured to death for refusing to deny his God given immunity

Now we are all supposed to bow down to these doctors who are being portrayed as heros while being paid millions in 2021/2022 by pharma and the medical industrial complex who created Plandemic/ genocide/mass murder

They knew last August and December as my beloved husband and a beautiful mother of a 4 year and 9 year old we’re murdered Repentance means turning 180 degrees and asking for forgiveness and getting justice for those murdered by either Ignorance or malfeasance at best Not generating a new term mass psychosis while laughing on fol about blaming the victims No evil at NIH

No Plandemic No genocide of millions Really?Just arrest the psychotic like dr Judy who clearly cause this 40 year Plague of corruption!! I’ll never stop telling trutha no d showing the data

Best regards

Judy

OK, let’s work through these accusations, for the record, to the extent possible.

I have not received any funding from DARPA, have never written a DARPA proposal, have never assisted a client in obtaining funding from DARPA, have never worked with DARPA.

I have not worked on bioweapons programs. I have worked on development of vaccines for HIV, Ebola, Influenza, VEE, WEE, Tularemia, Smallpox, SARS-CoV-2 and many other agents. I am a vaccine development expert. And a clinical development expert. And a regulatory affairs expert. And a government contracting expert. And a program and project management expert. It is what I used to do. I spent decades developing that expertise. And I threw away my consulting business to speak out about the corruption and failures of the USG to follow well established norms including bioethical norms in the case of the genetic SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. And I have spent quite literally hundreds of hours on podcasts trying to educate people about these issues.

I am sorry that Dr. Judy Mikovits has experienced such tragedy in her life. But, to state the obvious, this is not my fault.

I performed a threat assessment during the first week of January, 2020 concerning what I was able to discover regarding SARS-CoV-2, and determined that there was insufficient time to develop a safe and effective vaccine for the virus (and also noted the horrible history of prior attempts to develop human vaccines for other coronaviruses), and then spun up a highly skilled team (and got them funded) focusing on repurposing existing licensed drugs for treating the disease. My efforts directly lead to the discovery and initial clinical testing of famotidine and the combination of famotidine and celecoxib (together with colleagues), and obtaining funding for and helping manage a variety other clinical trials for these agents as well as ivermectin. I was a very early advocate for ivermectin, and strongly backed the initial ivermectin clinical trial review of Pierre Kory in my role as editor of the special edition of Frontiers in Pharmacology which focused on repurposed drugs.

The term “Mass Psychosis” as well as the term “Mass formation” were well established before I learned of them from Dr. Mattias Desmet. And Dr. Desmet did not invent the terms, despite what Dr. Breggin has been saying. These terms have been used in the literature for many decades. And Dr. Desmet has been subjected to non-stop slander and defamation in the european press for his academic scholarship published in English under the title “Psychological basis of Totalitarianism”. This is a false narrative which Dr. Breggin should know better than to promote, as in theory this is his professional specialty. Unprofessional behavior hardly begins to scratch the surface of what he has been up to lately with his attack tour focused on myself and Dr. Desmet. This “blaming the victims” narrative of Dr. Breggin is also a false accusation, as anyone who has read my writing or listened to me speak can attest.

Then there is this one “Now we are all supposed to bow down to these doctors who are being portrayed as heros while being paid millions in 2021/2022 by pharma and the medical industrial complex who created Plandemic/ genocide/mass murder”. I have no idea what she is referring to here. This is just unhinged raving. I certainly have not received millions in 2021/2022 from pharma and the medical industrial complex. This is a wild, unsupported defamatory accusation.

And then there is this: “They knew last August and December as my beloved husband and a beautiful mother of a 4 year and 9 year old we’re murdered Repentance means turning 180 degrees and asking for forgiveness and getting justice for those murdered by either Ignorance or malfeasance at best”. Not sure from this what I should be asking repentance for?

This has been my life since early August when the Breggins, Stew Peters, Jane Ruby, and Judy Mikovitz seem to have all agreed among themselves that I am a mass murderer, various flavors of controlled opposition, the devil incarnate, or some random mixture of the above.

Any day now I expect demands from this crew that I prove to the world that I have stopped beating my wife. Because this group just wants transparency, of course. Nothing to do with spinning up controversy so that they can get more clicks, sell more vitamins, air filters and books, etc. So here we go again.

Just for the record, I have not watched (and do not intend to watch) Judy’s interview on “The Clay Clark Thrive Time Show on September 11”, and she has never corresponded with me until today (copied above) after I received this email from “Martin Wendelboe”. I have no idea who Clay Clark is. And I do not need any more poison in my life than I am already dealing with from the left wing corporate press. I have no idea of what Judy said, or what accusations she may have made on that broadcast. I barely have time to take care of my farm and house chores, write or edit the daily substack, tour all over the world speaking, do 5-10 broadcasts per week, and do my laundry. And occasionally pet the dogs and take them for a walk. I do not generally listen to other peoples podcasts, and rarely even listen to my own. I have never listened to the entire infamous Joe Rogan podcast that I recorded. I do know that Judy has been touring with the Breggins, Stew Peters, Jane Ruby and others. I avoided participating in that tour, in large part because I do not want to be associated with conspiracy theorists.

And I do not respond well to people who try to blackmail me to go on their podcasts, as the Breggins did. And I do not do podcasts to “debate” with the crazies. I have enough to do without dealing with all of this additional darkness. I hope I have now made that clear to all concerned. Just because someone attacks me does not mean that I have an obligation to go on their podcast so that they can get lots of clicks and sell more vitamins or air filters or books or whatever. Seems pretty straightforward? Make sense to you? Are we all aligned on this?

I prefer to avoid the fever swamps of conspiracy land, and to stay fact based. Which is why I was late to the party (compared to some) in coming to terms with the WEF and the “Great Reset”. Because it was outside of my core competency, I have never been to the Davos meetings, and this seemed to be yet another conspiracy theory. And when I realized I was wrong about that, I dove in to try to better understand the WEF, documented the young leaders program and its trainees, etc. And I wrote about what I discovered.

However, there does seem to have been something odd happening with those who participated on that particular tour involving Breggin, Mikovits and others, and many involved seem to have developed an obsession with me for some reason. Maybe because I turned down the offer?

I do not understand this logic that I have an obligation to respond to every wild claim or personal attack that someone may wish to make about me. Especially when they involve someone grabbing some fragment off of my CV and then blowing that up into some big conspiracy when they do not even take the time to investigate the topic and context. For example, please see this recent substack, which addresses the most recent fever dreams of Jane Ruby and Stew Peters. Neither of which seem to be able to read and comprehend a US Government web page. Maybe having been a drug rep and a bounty hunter (respectively) before COVID-19 is not sufficient preparation for becoming responsible investigative journalists? Many seem to find them entertaining. But that does not obligate me to have to respond to their every wild accusation. And no, the government is not putting snake venom into the drinking water.

So, now Jill reads this latest email and gets upset that Dr. Judy Mikovitz is attacking me. There is a saying that “A happy wife is a happy life”. True enough, but the contrapositive is also true. Why people feel that they need to make wild accusations is beyond me. But I guess concern trolls are going to troll, and conspiracy theorists are going to conspiracy theorize.

And so, to please Jill, I respond to this thread.

Dear Dr. Mikovitz

Wrong.

No DARPA grants.

No bioweapons research.

Vaccines research.

Judy - you understand the government. Can't you read a CV?Please stop spreading lies about me. And please, get a grip.

Do you read our substack?

Your comments and those of Dr. Breggin, Stew Peters and Jane Ruby are repeatedly factually wrong. This one addresses the false ACTIV accusations as well as the false mRNA vaccine development accusations.

J’Accuse!

This one addresses the underlying business models being advanced here

Well Being: Stoking Rage

This one addresses Dr. Breggins' misrepresentations regarding Mattias Desmet's work

Is Mattias Desmet an expert in Mass Formation or a Trojan Horse

As does this

The Psychology of Totalitarianism

This addresses the layers of psychological phenomina

Caged animals are safe, but it is not much of a life

And these address the WEF

WEF Graduates in the USA - Elected June, 2022?

The Annual Summer WEF Meeting

Did Justin Trudeau Just Destroy “Social Credit System” Logic?

Eating Bugs: Let’s Dig into It!

Child Sacrifice, WEF/WHO Power Grab

And so many more…

And of course, your comments about the advertisement which Mikki Willis produced for Plandemic 3 being about selling alcohol is a complete distortion of reality.

Please see https://rumble.com/v1ia5qt-the-most-...ng-doctor.html

Your repeated attacks represent gross misrepresentations of my positions and writing.

Please just stop.

robert

In response to which I receive a clip from Judy from my own CV listing a few of the contracts that I have won for clients or been involved in managing. None of which have anything to do with DARPA. Because I have never been involved in a DARPA contract. What the clip does document is that I have worked on a multi-million dollar BARDA program for development of a cell-based influenza vaccine (not involving genetic vaccination). And played a key role in enabling the advanced development and licensure of the “Merck” Ebola vaccine. Among other projects. Which facts I have discussed in multiple prior podcasts.

Concern trolls are going to troll, conspiracy theorists are going to conspiracy theorize, and haters are going to hate.

I am trying to help the world sort out what has gone on since January 2020, and to think through what we can do to help stop this from happening to us again. But I have neither time nor interest in trying to drain the fever swamps. And it is not my job to address whatever paranoid conspiracy theories various people may spin up in their spare time and then broadcast on some obscure podcast that I have never even heard of before.

So, to those who choose to listen to the crazies, please stop insisting that I have an obligation to do so, and do not write to me about what you imagine to be some sort of obligation that I have to make happy with people who feel the need to spin up crazy ad hominum attacks.

If you believe that it is entertaining to have your hate and fear buttons pushed, that is your business. But leave me out of it. Please, listen. Just leave me (and my partner Jill) alone about these people.

I have done nothing to harm them, and I do not owe them anything. And I especially do not owe them the favor of coming on their podcasts so that they can make money off of insulting me.

Thank you for your understanding.

Over. The plane will be landing soon.

[gini]

EU INVESTIGATING VAX DEATH! - FORCED BY 1600% EXCESS DEATH NUMBERS! - WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW!--18/9/22--30 min --World Alternative Media-
Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video//qKnOiI3dgTte/

[DaveToo]

As of Sep 14, 2022 (five days ago) the WHO refuses to declare the pandemic over.
They say this is not the time to let up with Covid measures (vaccines, testing etc.).

Press conferences on COVID-19 and other global health issues


In contrast, Dr. Biden has become the spokesman for the world when it comes to health matters.
He has declared the pandemic over!


The vaccines manufacturers seem to be reluctantly siding with Biden.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Biden: 'Pandemic Is Over' Just In Time For Elections!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oJyHhkFKX0g

In an interview full of shocking statements, President Biden told 60 Minutes last night that the Covid pandemic is now over. It may sound good this close to the election, but such an announcement has enormous implications for those still being fired and harassed. Also today: blockbuster NY Post article claims Facebook spied on (conservative) users PRIVATE msgs and sent them to the FBI.

[Libico]

https://brownstone.org/articles/adve...try-of-health/

The Israeli MOH had no adverse events reporting system for the entire year of 2021. They commissioned a research team to analyze the reports from a new system implemented on December 2021.

A leaked video reveals that in June, the researchers presented serious findings to the MOH, that indicated long-term effects, including some not listed by Pfizer, and a causal relationship. Te Ministry published a manipulative report, and told the public that no new signal was found.

“Here we will have to really think medical-legal. Why medical-legal? Because for quite a few adverse events we said: ‘OK, it exists, and there is a report, but still get vaccinated.’ I mean, we have to think about how to write it and how to present it correctly. So this will not yield lawsuits later: ‘Wait, wait, wait, you said everything will pass and you can get vaccinated. And now look what happened to me. The phenomenon continues.‘”

The speaker is Prof. Mati Berkowitz, a pediatric specialist, head of the Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology unit at Shamir Medical Center, and head of the research team appointed by the Israeli Ministry of Health (IMOH) to examine the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. This crucial study was based on a new adverse event reporting system the MOH launched in December 2021 – 12 months AFTER rolling out the vaccines to the public, as the system was implemented in December 2020, as they now officially admit, was dysfunctional and did not allow an analysis of the data.

In an internal Zoom meeting in early June, the recording of which was leaked to the press, Prof. Berkowitz warned MOH senior officials that they should think carefully how to present his study’s findings to the public, otherwise they may be sued, since they completely contradict the MOH’s claims that serious side effects are rare, short-term and transient.

After analyzing the reports received over a period of 6 months, the research team found that many serious side effects were in fact long-term, including ones not listed by Pfizer, and established causal relations with the vaccine. Yet, instead of publishing the findings in a transparent manner to the public, the MOH withheld the findings for nearly two months, and when it finally released an official document, it misrepresented and manipulated the findings, minimizing the extent of reports, and stating that no new adverse events (“signals”) were found, and that the events that were detected were not necessarily caused by the vaccine, even though the researchers themselves said the exact opposite.

As is well known, Israel was crowned, by none other than Pfizer’s CEO Albert Burla, “the world’s laboratory.” And for a good reason. Indeed, Israel has a very high vaccination rate and was the first in the world to give boosters to everyone. In fact, Pfizer’s request for the approval of the boosters was at least partially based on the so-called study conducted in Israel. Israel was also one of the first countries in the world to vaccinate pregnant women.

Yet, as the MOH now admits, during this entire critical year in which the vast majority of Israelis were vaccinated, most of them with 2-3 doses, the vaccine adverse events reporting system was dysfunctional and did not enable a reliable analysis of the data.

In fact, since the beginning of the vaccination campaign, many Israeli experts have expressed serious concerns regarding the ability of the IMOH to monitor the safety of the vaccine and provide reliable data to the world. Nevertheless, the IMOH told the Israeli public, the FDA, and the entire world that they have a surveillance system, and that they are closely monitoring the data. For example, Prof. Retsef Levy from MIT, an expert in health systems and risk management, voiced serious criticism during a Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting on September 17 of last year which focused on the approval of the booster dose, stating that the system is dysfunctional and that the safety of COVID-19 vaccines is not monitored properly. In response, Dr. Sharon Alroi-Preis, the Health Ministry’s head of public services and a top COVID adviser to the Israeli government, claimed that she is “pretty surprised with Retsef Levi’s comment that Israel doesn’t follow adverse events.” Dr. Alroi-Preis stated: “It’s our data. I’m in charge of it. So I know exactly what is being reported to us.”

Only at the end of December 2021, a year after starting the vaccine rollout, did the MOH finally institute a proper system to coincide with the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in children aged 5-11. The new system is based on a non-anonymous digital reporting form, which the Ministry asked all public HMOs (Health Management Organizations) to distribute among all patients after they had been vaccinated, so that those who suffered side effects could report them. At the same time, the ministry appointed Prof. Mati Berkowitz and his staff members to analyze the reports. The analysis was done on reports received from the HMOs in Israel over a period of 6 months – from the beginning of December 2021 to the end of May 2022.

The team examined both the close categories of side effects that were set by the MOH (there were 7 such categories), and the free text (they identified 22 categories of side effects). Due to limited time and resources, they decided to first analyze only the 5 most common side effects they identified: 1. neurological injuries; 2. general side effects; 3. menstrual irregularities; 4. musculoskeletal system disorders; and 5. digestive system/kidney and urinary system.

In early June, the researchers presented their findings to MOH senior officials, including Dr. Emilia Anis, head of the MOH’s epidemiological department. Here are their main findings and points:

New signals – The research team identified and characterized side effects not listed by Pfizer, including neurological side effects such as hypoesthesia, paresthesia, tinnitus, and dizziness; back pain; and digestive system symptoms in children (abdominal pain).
Long-term events – The research team repeatedly stressed during the discussion that their findings indicate that, contrary to what we were told so far, in many cases, serious adverse events are long-term, last weeks, months, a year, or even more, and in some cases – are ongoing, so that the side effect still lasted when the study was over. These include menstrual irregularities and various neurological side effects, muscle-skeletal injuries, GI problems, and kidney and urinary system adverse events.

Re-challenge – The researchers found many cases of re-challenge – recurrence or worsening of a side effect following repeated doses of the vaccine. In fact, they identified cases of re-challenge in all the 5 most common side effects they analyzed – e.g., neurological injuries; general side effects; menstrual irregularities; musculoskeletal system disorders; and digestive system/kidney and urinary system.

An important example that demonstrates the severity of these findings is menstrual disorders.

Long-lasting – In one of the slides, the researchers wrote: “Studies carried out on the above-mentioned subject noted short-term abnormalities (up to a few days) in the menstrual cycle. However, over 90% of the reports detailing the characteristics of the duration of this adverse event indicate long-term changes (emphasis in the original. Y.S). Over 60% indicate duration of over 3 months.”

Rechallenge – Then in ~10% of the cases, the problem recurred following additional doses.

Professor Retsef Levi, who is also a member of the Israel Public Emergency Council for the COVID 19 Crisis, said in an interview with GB News that the example of long-term menstrual disorders detected in the study also demonstrates the authorities’ response to the public’s reports.

At first, they utterly deny any causal relationship between these disorders and the COVID-19 vaccines – in this case they denied it despite countless reports that flooded the internet from the very beginning of the vaccination rollout. Then, when the reports still continued and became impossible to deny, the authorities, and experts on their behalf, changed the narrative admitting there might be a relationship, but even if there is one, the symptoms are mild and transient. They only last a few days and they have no future implications on fertility.

The researchers’ conclusions: The findings establish causality, and may lead to lawsuits

1. Causality – The researchers emphasize that, according to the literature, these findings establish causal relations between the vaccine and the side effects.
As can be heard in the following clip, Prof. Berkowitz stresses that it increases the chances of causality “from possible to definite:”

“One of the things that are strong here is the re-challenge. We know about medications. There is the Naranjo scale [the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) Probability Scale]. Naranjo, when there is an adverse event which recurs with the re-challenge, it turns from ‘possible’ to definite, to significant.”

2. Think Medical-Legal – as if all this wasn’t damning enough, Prof. Berkowitz warns the MOH officials, in reference to the long-lasting side effects, they should think carefully how to present his study’s findings to the public, since they completely contradict their claims that serious side effects are rare, short-term and transient.

The HMO’s are keeping the data close to their chests

The research team explained during the meeting that their study has one important limitation – they only got cooperation from one small HMO to share the data it received from the new reporting system. (Israel’s health system is divided into 4 different HMO-type organizations; each Israeli is signed up with one of them) None of the other 3 HMO’s shared their data, including Israel’s 2 largest ones – Clalit and Maccabi. Prof. Berkowitz said that they are keeping the data ‘close to their chests.’

The only HMO that did share the data (Meuchedet) is very small, representing only about 15% of the Israeli population, with a heavy religious population, which has lower vaccination rates than the general population, and seldom use smartphones, so most of them were not even able to receive the text message.

Two other limitations mentioned by the research team:

The most severe cases were not even included in the analysis. There were 173 cases of hospitalization and ER visits that were separately examined by a dedicated expert committee.
The researchers stressed they still have a lot of work to do , since they only analyzed the 5 top common side effects, but there were 17 others (including cardiovascular, which was 6th most common) that they did not yet analyze.



‘The denominator report’ – concealment, manipulation and cover-up

Although the IMOH was aware of these findings, they withheld them for 2 months, not only from the public, but even from their own expert committee that decided on June 30 to approve the vaccine for infants as young as 6 months. That decision was made 3 weeks after the IMOH had been warned about these results and their implications.

The formal report was finally released, on August 20, in a closed press briefing, and surprisingly, the MOH admitted in the report, black on white, that Israel did not have a functional adverse events reporting system until December 2021. The unbelievable explanation was: “As the vaccination operation progressed, data was received from the anonymous online form, but without the ability to process and professionally validate the data.”

Yet, even after receiving such serious findings and warnings, they manipulated the data and tried to hide crucial information to make the vaccine look safe.

‘No new signal’ – The MOH went so far as to claim there were no new adverse events found in the study that were not already known – no new signals. What about the neurological injuries, which the researchers said are not even mentioned on Pfizer’s label? What about the long duration, or the re-challenge? None of these findings are anywhere to be found in the official report.

Manipulating the numbers – In order to promote the narrative of “rare adverse events,” the MOH divided the number of reports received with a denominator of the total number of doses given in Israel for the entire year and a half since the beginning of the vaccine rollout – ~18 million, hiding the fact that they only instituted the system in December 2021, and that the analysis was done on reports received during the 6 months until May 2022, from one small HMO.

This ignores the known fact that such passive reporting systems cover only a fraction of the actual events. That would still be true even if the system was operational throughout the entire vaccination period and used by all HMOs (which of course is not the current case). This manipulation – using the denominator of the total doses, was repeated in each of the categories of the side effects in the report.

Furthermore, it turns out that in order to downplay the rate of reports on menstrual irregularities, the MOH used a denominator of the total number of all adult doses – ~16 million – and thus, absurdly, included men in the equation of how common menstrual irregularities are.

Global implications

The discussion exposed in the leaked video has far-reaching and worrying implications at a global level. While Israel is a relatively small country, it was dubbed “the world’s laboratory.” The eyes of much of the world were on it, and the FDA and other regulators have repeatedly cited its experience with the vaccine as a basis for policy-making, including for boosters and mandates and much else.

So if Israel did not in fact have a functioning adverse event monitoring system in place and its data was a fiction, and even if when it did launch a proper monitoring system a year too late, with analysis of the system’s findings completely ignored and withheld – what was the FDA really relying on? What were all those regulators relying on?

[mountain_jim]

Brian Cates
Remember the DARPA contract Daszak & Co. did that DARPA turned down to engage in gain of function research on bat coronaviruses?

Daszak and his merry crew simply went and got the funding from the NIH and the NIAID.

And then spent two years lying their asses off and trying cover up what they did.

https://renz-law.com/wp-content/uplo...nson-Final.pdf



////////////////////








(from page 8)

What is Gain-of Function Research?

For purposes of this discussion, gain-of-function research involves manipulating viruses in a laboratory setting to investigate their potential to infect humans.
Here is a description of how gain-of-function research was conducted on a virus to make it transmissible to humans and to potentially make it more deadly to humans (in other words, the creation of SARS-CoV-2):

• First, the genome of an existing virus is mapped.
• In one approach, a virus is passaged in host animals (for example from mouse-to-mouse or ferret-to-ferret) repeatedly until a virus with different properties emerges. The virus may not have the capability of infecting a targeted animal species at the beginning of the project but gains this capability to infect the target animal through serial transmission.
• Another approach involves directly engineering changes in the genome of the virus. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, a genetically engineered spike protein created in the lab, was inserted into the genetic sequence of a virus. The high affinity of this spike protein to the ACE2 receptor in the body increased the infectivity of what became SARS-CoV-2.
• The new virus was then tested on humanized mice (biologically modified with a human receptor that enabled the new SARS-CoV-2 to enter their cells) and on human lung cells in the lab.
• Researchers succeeded in infecting human epithelial cell preparations and making the living mice sick with SARS-CoV-2. They knew they had created a virus that could infect humans.
• They then made the absurd claim that this process can happen in nature, which is why more funding should be allocated to conduct more of this type of research

[mizo]

Not sure what to say about this...