+ Reply to Thread
Page 54 of 209 FirstFirst 1 4 44 54 64 104 154 209 LastLast
Results 1,061 to 1,080 of 4176

Thread: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

  1. Link to Post #1061
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,743 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Not really sure where to put this, but I'm pretty sure I don't care; though I do feel I have to share for those that may benefit.


    Exponential change is very difficult for humans, we do not comprehend S curve adaptation or change. Humans are very familiar with linear growth, Exponential growth is not something we are used it at all.

    there are certain points in history that are referred to as "inflection" points, but they truly are never recognized via anything but retrospective analysis.

    it's interesting, and a very over looked part of history. In 1894 (before the 1910'ish sweeping adaption of motorized vehicles) we were terrified about the management of horse manure on city streets...

    Either way, this smacks very much of the above.

    I'm highly impressed with what I've seen in the last decade, in fact I have personally benefited greatly; I think rapid growth vrs financial collapse (which seems to be global currently) is something to consider with this information.





    how close are we to the "Jetsons" ?
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  2. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    ClearWater (7th October 2022), gini (2nd October 2022), Inversion (14th October 2022), iota (7th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (8th October 2022), onevoice (2nd October 2022), pabranno (2nd October 2022), Reinhard (2nd October 2022), Richard S. (2nd October 2022), Snoweagle (2nd October 2022), The KMan (3rd October 2022), thepainterdoug (2nd October 2022), Vangelo (2nd October 2022)

  3. Link to Post #1062
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,545
    Thanks
    53,951
    Thanked 138,046 times in 23,978 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Gov. Newsome Signs the Bill To Punish Doctors for COVID Misinformation
    10,083 views 10/1/22
    1.5K
    Drbeen Medical Lectures
    598K subscribers

    "Gov. Newsome Signs the Bill To Punish Doctors for COVID Misinformation"



    CA Medical MISINFORMATION Bill TRAMPLES Doctors’ 1A Rights, Will Newsom Sign It?
    35,060 views Aug 31, 2022
    1K
    The Hill
    1.53M subscribers

    "California's State Senate passed a bill last night that would punish doctors for spreading false or misleading medical information about Covid vaccines or treatments. Briahna Joy Gray and Robby Soave discuss.

    According to the CDC, in April 2021, increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna). Data from multiple studies show a rare risk for myocarditis and/or pericarditis following receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. These rare cases of myocarditis or pericarditis have occurred most frequently in adolescent and young adult males, ages 16 years and older, within 7 days after receiving the second dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna). There has not been a similar reporting pattern observed after receipt of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine (Johnson & Johnson).

    CDC continues to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for everyone 6 months of age and older. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and CDC have determined that the benefits (such as prevention of COVID-19 cases and its severe outcomes) outweigh the risks of myocarditis and pericarditis after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines."

    Last edited by onawah; 2nd October 2022 at 05:12.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Antagenet (8th October 2022), avid (2nd October 2022), ClearWater (7th October 2022), Dennis Leahy (3rd October 2022), fifi (5th October 2022), Franny (2nd October 2022), gini (2nd October 2022), Harmony (5th October 2022), Inversion (5th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (8th October 2022), justntime2learn (9th October 2022), onevoice (2nd October 2022), Orph (2nd October 2022), pabranno (2nd October 2022), RatRodRob...RRR (22nd October 2022), Reinhard (2nd October 2022), rgray222 (2nd October 2022), Snoweagle (2nd October 2022), Spiral (2nd October 2022), Stephanie (19th October 2022), The KMan (3rd October 2022), Vangelo (2nd October 2022), wondering (2nd October 2022)

  5. Link to Post #1063
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,545
    Thanks
    53,951
    Thanked 138,046 times in 23,978 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Woke Twitter Staff FACES MELT After Elon Buyout FINALIZING--Timcast
    192,020 views 10/4/22
    14K
    Timcast IRL
    1.36M subscribers

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (5th October 2022), Inversion (5th October 2022), iota (7th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (8th October 2022)

  7. Link to Post #1064
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    this came out yesterday and someone ~ ANYONE ~

    actually having the courage and being BOLD enough to speak

    words that are TRUE is so novel these days ..

    it is making headlines and throwing MSM into a genuine hizzy fit!


    partial transcript of full video below:

    "Days ago, Kanye West accompanied by his friend Candance Owen sported shirts simply stating:

    WHITE LIVES MATTER

    the response from Fashion Week and International media was:

    Shock! HORROR! ~ RAGE!


    "there is no excuse for this!" uttered the New York Times

    "this is legitimizing extremesim!" shrieked Rolling Stones

    etc .. etc. "



    question: is there any way we can hasten the demise of these irrelvant would be controllers of the social narrative? ..

    how can we communicate:.


    we are NOT actually going to OBEY what they TELL us to think? ...




    may God bless him!!

    you know? this man? was raised by a God fearing woman

    she did her best to instill strength and conviction and courage in her son

    and he LOVED his mama! she did right by him .. and it shows

    i'm personally grateful because he has take a personal interest in my son

    they're friends, he's very supportive of what my son puts out and he's even had him picked up (across different states) to be taken to some of his events and such

    my son is white ... Ye is sincere ... and recently, words such as

    "that's a blessing" and even being told "you need to pray about that"

    have come out of my son's mouth

    what a private Christian education didn't get him to do?

    Ye has accomplished ...

    so i'm pretty grateful ...



    PS i'll update further on news in the election thread in a bit ..

    *UPDATE*

    article posted here
    Last edited by iota; 8th October 2022 at 01:20. Reason: updated
    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  8. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Blacklight43 (9th October 2022), Brigantia (7th October 2022), ClearWater (7th October 2022), DNA (8th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (8th October 2022), justntime2learn (7th October 2022), Michel Leclerc (22nd October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022), Reinhard (7th October 2022), Sue (Ayt) (7th October 2022), Tyy1907 (8th October 2022), Vangelo (7th October 2022)

  9. Link to Post #1065
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Quote Posted by DaveToo (here)
    Quote Posted by iota (here)
    this is in the realm of practically unfathomable

    and right up criminally negligible

    and may even qualify as criminal stupidity were such a category to exist ...



    WARNING: woman stopped by police placed in hand cuffs in back of police vehicle parked on train tracks ...




    Video shows train slam into Platteville police vehicle
    with woman inside

    the Denver Post reports:

    "A police officer standing near a patrol vehicle parked on Weld County railroad tracks last week ran for safety seconds before a train — its horn blaring — slammed into the SUV, seriously injuring a woman in police custody who had been left in the back of the vehicle.

    It took two other officers, who had been searching the woman’s pickup truck for weapons, at least 15 seconds to react to the train barreling toward the police cruiser while blasting its horn, warning of a coming collision, according to Fort Lupton Police Department video footage released Friday.

    Yareni Rios-Gonzalez, 20, of Greeley suffered multiple broken bones and a head injury when the train smashed the Platteville Police Department patrol vehicle around 7:30 p.m. Sept. 16, on railroad tracks near U.S. 85 and Weld 38.

    Her attorney, Paul Wilkinson, on Friday said he is amazed she survived the train’s impact while handcuffed and trapped in the backseat of the police vehicle.

    He also said it was hard to understand why police officers parked on the railroad tracks in the first place and then failed to move the vehicle once his client was detained inside.

    Quote
    “It’s kind of unbelievable they did something like this,”


    ~ Wilkinson said.
    Rios-Gonzalez’s injuries include a broken arm that has needed surgery, nine broken ribs, a fractured sternum, a back injury and a head injury, Wilkinson said.

    Although Rios-Gonzalez was unconscious when she arrived at an area hospital, she recalls the crash, Wilkinson said.

    “She saw it coming and could hear the horn,” Wilkinson said. “She was trying to get the police officers’ attention, screaming at them. She tried unlocking the door. She had her hands behind her back and was frantically trying to unlock the door.”

    Wilkinson blames the officers for her injuries.

    “I don’t think you ever park on a train track. Ever,” he said. “That would have avoided the whole situation. You just never park on a train track. You have to park somewhere else.”

    On Friday night, a Platteville police officer stopped Rios-Gonzalez after Fort Lupton police received a report about a road rage incident involving a gun. Rios-Gonzalez pulled over just past the railroad tracks on Weld 38, and the Platteville police officer stopped behind her car, with this patrol vehicle on the tracks.

    The eight minutes of edited police footage released Friday shows two Fort Lupton officers arriving to provide backup to the Platteville police officer. They coax Rios-Gonzalez from her pickup truck, handcuff her and put her in the back of the Platteville patrol vehicle, which remained on the train tracks.

    The footage, which includes body camera video and a patrol vehicle’s dashcam video, was obtained by The Denver Post through an open records request.

    The Platteville officer and one Fort Lupton officer then searched the pickup truck for other people. Once they finished, the Platteville officer and a second Fort Lupton officer began searching for weapons. The other Fort Lupton officer, who can be seen in the video holding a rifle, returned to the area near the patrol car where Rios-Gonzalez was in custody.

    As the officers searching the truck discussed whether or not Rios-Gonzalez might have tossed a gun out a window before she pulled over, a train’s horn can be heard in the distance. But it took the two officers at least 15 seconds to notice it, the video footage shows.

    One officer screamed an expletive as they realize a Union Pacific train is coming toward the parked patrol vehicle. The other yelled for his colleague to “stay back,” the footage shows.

    The other Fort Lupton officer, who was standing near the Platteville patrol vehicle with Rios-Gonazlez inside, turned back and forth a couple of times as the train approached, police camera footage shows. He ultimately turned and ran for cover behind a Fort Lupton police car."

    read full article https://www.denverpost.com/2022/09/23/colorado-train-hits-police-vehicle-woman-inside/

    this level of incompetence is incomparable

    to anything i've ever seen

    or possibly conceived ...
    I didn't watch the whole video closely, but what struck me hard were the policemen looking for evidence in the crashed vehicle, chatting to each other very calmly and even joking. All the while there was a woman in part of the vehicle with serious potentially life-threatening injuries, not tending to her.
    I just can't fathom any of that!
    that WAS pretty despicable

    for ordinary citizens there are laws that address that type of negligence

    but it is up to the citizens who observe and live in the communities to take on the response-ability

    to ensure their public servants?

    SERVE the public

    it will not happen on its own

    and each time a boundary is crossed?

    AND allowed?

    the line gets further and further from shore

    so the question is ... HOW much and how far?

    are WE willing to tolerate

    and the answer? also begs another question ...

    WHY is that exactly? (the willingness to allow and tolerate)

    and at what point does that end?

    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Brigantia (8th October 2022), DaveToo (8th October 2022), DNA (8th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (8th October 2022), justntime2learn (9th October 2022), Michel Leclerc (22nd October 2022), Vangelo (8th October 2022), Vicus (8th October 2022)

  11. Link to Post #1066
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Quote Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
    Quote On Friday night, a Platteville police officer stopped Rios-Gonzalez after Fort Lupton police received a report about a road rage incident involving a gun.
    At the end of the vid they stated a gun had been found in her vehicle.

    It’s fair to judge the legal and procedural issues of how the stop went down, but maybe fate served her a steaming waffle of irony.
    that is, of course, possible

    just as it is possible, that as a woman traveling alone?

    she chose to exercise her 2nd amendment to carry a weapon to protect herself

    or because she liked the color, make or model

    ANYTHING is actually possible

    however, there ARE facts

    and the fact remains

    the level of irresponsibility, thoughtlessness and reckless disregard choices?

    resulted in irreparable harm to this woman

    BOTH physically .. and most likely, mentally and emotionally

    they had NO right to inflict such harm upon her

    nor was she being charged with ANY crime

    nor would her having BEEN charged with a crime

    have in ANY way excused nor absolved them of the responsibility

    that was ~ IS ~ indisputably theirs

    you and i? assuredly WOULD have been held responsible

    of that? there is NO doubt
    Last edited by iota; 8th October 2022 at 07:14.
    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  12. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Brigantia (8th October 2022), DNA (8th October 2022), justntime2learn (9th October 2022), Mike Gorman (22nd October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022), Vangelo (8th October 2022), Vicus (8th October 2022)

  13. Link to Post #1067
    Canada Avalon Member Johnnycomelately's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th January 2022
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Language
    English
    Age
    67
    Posts
    1,870
    Thanks
    24,724
    Thanked 11,569 times in 1,840 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Iota, of course you are right. I was looking a bit deeper, not to the physical and proveable. As with anything beyond that, it can be dismissed as a possibility.

    If I chased down another driver and brandished a gun at them, over a response to something I was doing (sounds like she was tailgating), I don’t think I should expect that the world should be considerate and smart in response.

    https://kdvr.com/news/local/police-c...e-platteville/

    “Also in the police report were details from the driver who initially called police on Rios-Gonzalez. He claimed she was tailing him and that he brake-checked her and tried to get away, but she pursued and ended up side by side with him.

    That’s when he claims she pulled a gun — a claim her attorney denies.”

    Quote Posted by iota (here)
    Quote Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
    Quote On Friday night, a Platteville police officer stopped Rios-Gonzalez after Fort Lupton police received a report about a road rage incident involving a gun.
    At the end of the vid they stated a gun had been found in her vehicle.

    It’s fair to judge the legal and procedural issues of how the stop went down, but maybe fate served her a steaming waffle of irony.
    that is, of course, possible

    just as it is possible, that as a woman traveling alone?

    she chose to exercise her 2nd amendment to carry a weapon to protect herself

    or because she liked the color, make or model

    ANYTHING is actually possible

    however, there ARE facts

    and the fact remains

    the level of irresponsibility, thoughtlessness and imbecile-like choices?

    resulted in irreparable harm to this woman

    BOTH physically .. and most likely, mentally and emotionally

    they had NO right to inflict such harm upon her

    nor was she being charged with ANY crime

    nor would her having BEEN charged with a crime

    have in ANY way excused nor absolved them of the responsibility

    that was ~ IS ~ indisputably theirs

    you and i? assuredly WOULD have been held responsible

    of that? there is NO doubt

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Johnnycomelately For This Post:

    Brigantia (8th October 2022), iota (8th October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022)

  15. Link to Post #1068
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Quote Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
    Iota, of course you are right. I was looking a bit deeper, not to the physical and proveable. As with anything beyond that, it can be dismissed as a possibility.

    If I chased down another driver and brandished a gun at them, over a response to something I was doing (sounds like she was tailgating), I don’t think I should expect that the world should be considerate and smart in response.

    https://kdvr.com/news/local/police-c...e-platteville/

    “Also in the police report were details from the driver who initially called police on Rios-Gonzalez. He claimed she was tailing him and that he brake-checked her and tried to get away, but she pursued and ended up side by side with him.

    That’s when he claims she pulled a gun — a claim her attorney denies.”

    Quote Posted by iota (here)
    Quote Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
    Quote On Friday night, a Platteville police officer stopped Rios-Gonzalez after Fort Lupton police received a report about a road rage incident involving a gun.
    At the end of the vid they stated a gun had been found in her vehicle.

    It’s fair to judge the legal and procedural issues of how the stop went down, but maybe fate served her a steaming waffle of irony.
    that is, of course, possible

    just as it is possible, that as a woman traveling alone?

    she chose to exercise her 2nd amendment to carry a weapon to protect herself

    or because she liked the color, make or model

    ANYTHING is actually possible

    however, there ARE facts

    and the fact remains

    the level of irresponsibility, thoughtlessness and imbecile-like choices?

    resulted in irreparable harm to this woman

    BOTH physically .. and most likely, mentally and emotionally

    they had NO right to inflict such harm upon her

    nor was she being charged with ANY crime

    nor would her having BEEN charged with a crime

    have in ANY way excused nor absolved them of the responsibility

    that was ~ IS ~ indisputably theirs

    you and i? assuredly WOULD have been held responsible

    of that? there is NO doubt
    Johnny,

    i can appreciate your thoughts and speculation

    but i do NOT share your views on "Expectation"

    i absolutely DO have an EXPECTATION of an officer of the Law to conduct himself with the highest degree of professionalism, courtesy, reasonable and be ABSOLUTELY conscious that he/she in taking someone into custody?

    is now 100% taking on responsibility for their welfare

    irrespective of ALL else?

    the police WERE 100% responsible and should be held accountable for her welfare

    THEY made that CHOICE

    she did NOT make that CHOICE

    in fact? CHOICE was denied her

    on a metaphysical and ontological level?

    you are responsible for you

    and i am responsible for me

    which means that NONE of HER actions relieved them of THEIR responsibilities

    NONE

    in other words, nothing about HER? gave them leave to behave irresponsibly, or to recklessly put her life in jeopardy, or to cause her the harm that they in fact DID

    we seem to live in a world that excuses tit for tat

    i don't know how to explain to them

    it doesn't work that way

    NO ONE is "excused" ... for ANYTHING .. like ever ....

    the consequences of CHOICES

    will ALWAYS belong to their SOURCE

    that's just universal law, and man's excuse of it is completely inconsequential in the matter ...

    irrespective of the stimulus?

    we will ALWAYS be response-able for OUR response



    PS .. perhaps i should also clarify i come from law enforcement in my family

    my grandfather was a police officer who died in the line of duty

    he was always the utmost gentleman, who conducted his duties with grace and integrity

    i was raised to respect that, not to condone its absence
    Last edited by iota; 8th October 2022 at 04:26.
    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Brigantia (8th October 2022), DaveToo (8th October 2022), DNA (8th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (8th October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022), thepainterdoug (8th October 2022), Vangelo (8th October 2022), Vicus (8th October 2022)

  17. Link to Post #1069
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    S.W. Missouri
    Language
    English
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,846
    Thanks
    36,402
    Thanked 30,446 times in 4,558 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Quote Posted by iota (here)
    Quote Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
    Iota, of course you are right. I was looking a bit deeper, not to the physical and proveable. As with anything beyond that, it can be dismissed as a possibility.

    If I chased down another driver and brandished a gun at them, over a response to something I was doing (sounds like she was tailgating), I don’t think I should expect that the world should be considerate and smart in response.

    https://kdvr.com/news/local/police-c...e-platteville/

    “Also in the police report were details from the driver who initially called police on Rios-Gonzalez. He claimed she was tailing him and that he brake-checked her and tried to get away, but she pursued and ended up side by side with him.

    That’s when he claims she pulled a gun — a claim her attorney denies.”

    Quote Posted by iota (here)
    Quote Posted by Johnnycomelately (here)
    Quote On Friday night, a Platteville police officer stopped Rios-Gonzalez after Fort Lupton police received a report about a road rage incident involving a gun.
    At the end of the vid they stated a gun had been found in her vehicle.

    It’s fair to judge the legal and procedural issues of how the stop went down, but maybe fate served her a steaming waffle of irony.
    that is, of course, possible

    just as it is possible, that as a woman traveling alone?

    she chose to exercise her 2nd amendment to carry a weapon to protect herself

    or because she liked the color, make or model

    ANYTHING is actually possible

    however, there ARE facts

    and the fact remains

    the level of irresponsibility, thoughtlessness and imbecile-like choices?

    resulted in irreparable harm to this woman

    BOTH physically .. and most likely, mentally and emotionally

    they had NO right to inflict such harm upon her

    nor was she being charged with ANY crime

    nor would her having BEEN charged with a crime

    have in ANY way excused nor absolved them of the responsibility

    that was ~ IS ~ indisputably theirs

    you and i? assuredly WOULD have been held responsible

    of that? there is NO doubt
    Johnny,

    i can appreciate your thoughts and speculation

    but i do NOT share your views on "Expectation"

    i absolutely DO have an EXPECTATION of an officer of the Law to conduct himself with the highest degree of professionalism, courtesy, reasonable and be ABSOLUTELY conscious that he/she in taking someone into custody?

    is now 100% taking on responsibility for their welfare

    irrespective of ALL else?

    the police WERE 100% responsible and should be held accountable for her welfare

    THEY made that CHOICE

    she did NOT make that CHOICE

    in fact? CHOICE was denied her

    on a metaphysical and ontological level?

    you are responsible for you

    and i am responsible for me

    which means that NONE of HER actions relieved them of THEIR responsibilities

    NONE

    in other words, nothing about HER? gave them leave to behave irresponsibly, or to recklessly put her life in jeopardy, or to cause her the harm that they in fact DID

    we seem to live in a world that excuses tit for tat

    i don't know how to explain to them

    it doesn't work that way

    NO ONE is "excused" ... for ANYTHING .. like ever ....

    the consequences of CHOICES

    will ALWAYS belong to their SOURCE

    that's just universal law, and man's excuse of it is completely inconsequential in the matter ...

    irrespective of the stimulus?

    we will ALWAYS be response-able for OUR response



    PS .. perhaps i should also clarify i come from law enforcement in my family

    my grandfather was a police officer who died in the line of duty

    he was always the utmost gentleman, who conducted his duties with grace and integrity

    i was raised to respect that, not to condone its absence
    I do want to mention that this woman is innocent until proven guilty. She may not have done anything.
    She may have been the victim of a false claim just like so many folks getting swatted right now.

  18. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Brigantia (9th October 2022), iota (8th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (13th October 2022), justntime2learn (9th October 2022), Michel Leclerc (22nd October 2022), onevoice (8th October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022), Reinhard (16th October 2022), Vangelo (8th October 2022), Vicus (8th October 2022), wondering (8th October 2022)

  19. Link to Post #1070
    Avalon Member justntime2learn's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd April 2014
    Posts
    2,195
    Thanks
    67,322
    Thanked 15,169 times in 2,149 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    I wasn't sure where to put this.
    It's all over the internet though.

    "JUST IN - North Korea fired 170 artillery shells into the "buffer zone," violating the 2018 inter-Korean agreement, South Korea's military says.

    @disclosetv



    N. Korea fires another missile, flies warplanes near border



    Quote Published: Oct. 13, 2022 at 10:37 AM PDT|Updated: 58 minutes ago
    SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korea early Friday launched a short-range ballistic missile toward its eastern waters and flew warplanes near the border with South Korea, further raising animosities triggered by the North’s recent barrage of weapons tests.

    South Korea’s military also said it detected North Korea firing about 170 rounds of artillery from eastern and western coastal areas near the border region and that the shells fell inside maritime buffer zones the Koreas established under a 2018 military agreement on reducing tensions.

    The North Korean moves suggest it would keep up a provocative run of weapons tests designed to bolster its nuclear capability for now. Some experts say North Korea would eventually want the United States and others to accept it as a nuclear state, lifting economic sanctions and making other concessions.

    South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a statement the missile lifted off from the North’s capital region at 1:49 a.m. Friday (1649 GMT Thursday; 12:49 p.m. EDT Thursday).


    While none of the North Korean artillery shells fell inside South Korean territorial waters, the Joint Chiefs of Staff described the firings as a clear violation of the 2018 agreement, which created buffer zones along land and sea boundaries and no-fly zones above the border to prevent clashes.

    Friday’s ballistic launch extended a record number of missile demonstrations by North Korea this year as it exploits the distraction created by Russia’s war on Ukraine to accelerate its arms development and increase pressure on Washington and its Asian allies.

    In response to North Korea’s intensifying testing activity and hostility, South Korea on Friday imposed unilateral sanctions on the North for the first time in five years, targeting 15 North Korean individuals and 16 organizations suspected of involvement in illicit activities to finance North Korea’s nuclear weapons and missile program.

    Japanese Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada said the missile flew on an “irregular” trajectory — a possible reference to describe the North’s highly maneuverable KN-23 weapon modeled on Russia’s Iskander missile.


    “Whatever the intentions are, North Korea’s repeated ballistic missile launches are absolutely impermissible and we cannot overlook its substantial advancement of missile technology,” Hamada said. “North Korea’s series of actions pose threats to Japan, as well as the region and the international community, and are absolutely intolerable.”

    The South Korean and Japanese militaries assessed that the missile traveled 650 to 700 kilometers (403-434 miles) at a maximum altitude of 50 kilometers (30 miles) before landing in waters between the Korean Peninsula and Japan.

    The U.S. Indo-Pacific Command said in a statement the North Korean launch didn’t pose an immediate threat to U.S. personnel or territory, or to its allies, adding that the U.S. commitments to the defense of South Korea and Japan remain “ironclad.”

    It was the latest in a series of missile launches by North Korea in recent weeks.


    North Korea said Monday that its missile tests in the past two weeks simulated nuclear attacks on key South Korean and U.S. targets. It said the tests included a new intermediate-range missile that flew over Japan and demonstrated a potential range to reach the U.S. Pacific territory of Guam, and a ballistic missile fired from an inland reservoir, a first for the country.

    North Korea said the weapons tests were meant to issue a warning to Seoul and Washington for staging “dangerous” joint naval exercises involving a U.S. aircraft carrier.

    Friday’s launch was the North’s second since its announcement on the simulation of nuclear strikes. Some observers had predicted North Korea would likely temporarily pause its testing activities in consideration of its major ally China, which is set to begin a major political conference Sunday to give President Xi Jinping a third five-year term as party leader.

    North Korea said leader Kim Jong Un supervised the test-launches Wednesday of long-range cruise missiles that he said successfully demonstrated his military’s expanding nuclear strike capabilities.


    After the tests, Kim praised the readiness of his nuclear forces, which he said were fully prepared for “actual war to bring enemies under their control at a blow” with various weapons systems that are “mobile, precise and powerful.” He also vowed to expand the operational realm of his nuclear armed forces, according to KCNA.

    There are concerns that Kim could up the ante soon with his first nuclear test since 2017 or by triggering military skirmishes with the South that could be followed by threats of using his nukes.

    The Koreas have so far avoided major skirmishes following their 2018 military agreement, which is one of the few tangible remnants from former South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s engagement efforts with Kim.

    Moon also helped set up Kim’s first summit with former U.S. President Donald Trump in June 2018, but the diplomacy collapsed after the second Kim-Trump meeting in February 2019, when the Americans rejected North Korean demands for major sanctions relief in exchange for a partial surrender of their nuclear capabilities.


    The urgency of North Korea’s nuclear program has grown since it passed a new law last month authorizing the preemptive use of nuclear weapons over a broad range of scenarios, including non-war situations when it may perceive its leadership as under threat.

    Most of the recent North Korean tests were mostly of short-range nuclear-capable missiles targeting South Korea. Some experts say North Korea’s possible upcoming nuclear test, the first of in five years, would be related to efforts to manufacture battlefield tactical warheads to be placed on such short-range missiles.

    These developments sparked security jitters in South Korea, with some politicians and scholars renewing their calls for the U.S. to redeploy its tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea as deterrence against intensifying North Korean nuclear threats.

    South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff said in a separate statement that North Korea had flown warplanes, presumably 10 aircraft, near the rivals’ border late Thursday and early Friday, prompting South Korea to scramble fighter jets.


    The North Korean planes flew as close as 12 kilometers (7 miles) north of the inter-Korean border. South Korea responded by scrambling F-35 jets and other warplanes, according to the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

    There were no reports of clashes. A similar incident took place last week, but it was still uncommon for North Korea to fly its warplanes near the border. Also, in the previous flight last week, North Korean warplanes flew much farther away from the border.

    North Korea’s military early Friday accused South Korea of carrying out artillery fire for about 10 hours near the border. The North Korean military said it took unspecified “strong military countermeasures” in response.

    “The (North) Korean People’s Army sends a stern warning to the South Korean military inciting military tension in the front-line area with reckless action,” an unidentified spokesman for the General Staff of the Korean People’s Army said in a statement carried by KCNA.
    Link: https://www.wjhg.com/2022/10/13/nort...korean-border/
    Last edited by justntime2learn; 14th October 2022 at 01:46. Reason: Added source
    “To develop a complete mind: Study the art of science; study the science of art. Learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else” – Leonardo Da Vinci

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to justntime2learn For This Post:

    Brigantia (16th October 2022), Carlitos (16th October 2022), gini (14th October 2022), iota (16th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (13th October 2022), Vangelo (14th October 2022)

  21. Link to Post #1071
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Quote Posted by justntime2learn (here)
    I wasn't sure where to put this.
    It's all over the internet though.

    "JUST IN - North Korea fired 170 artillery shells into the "buffer zone," violating the 2018 inter-Korean agreement, South Korea's military says.

    @disclosetv


    thank you!

    we're about 15 days out to midterms

    NO ONE will buy a Democrat win much less a sweep

    the Dems themselves are YELLING at the fastidious AOC

    astounding 2 minute video that ought to go viral (see here)

    it's really good to see the people DEMAND, not ask, to be heard!

    and now in another part of the world ..

    people there are arising against their government as well

    threatening the interests of the Clinton Foundation so ....



    A man walks past burning tires set up by protesters during a protest demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Ariel Henry in the Delmas area of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Monday, Oct. 10, 2022. (AP Photo/Odelyn Joseph) ODELYN JOSEPH AP


    Exclusive: U.S. will support sending ‘multinational rapid action force’ to Haiti

    the MiamiHerald reports:

    "The United States has drafted a United Nations Security Council resolution that will encourage the “immediate deployment of a multinational rapid action force” to Haiti to address the nation’s worst security and health crisis in decades, according to a copy of the resolution obtained by McClatchy and the Miami Herald.

    The draft resolution, confirmed by multiple U.S. and U.N. officials, comes in response to a call by U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres last week for the establishment of a rapid reaction force to assist the Haitian National Police. Over the past four weeks, powerful armed gangs have all but sent the country into anarchy, blockading the country’s largest fuel terminals and cutting off its critical roadways.

    It is the first public indication so far that the Biden administration is willing to participate in a military force in Haiti — although the resolution does not specify what role various nations would play.

    A U.S. source familiar with the drafting of the resolution said the multilateral force would not be under the supervision of the U.N. or assembled under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter, which endorses the use of force for the maintenance of peace.

    Last week, Guterres proposed that Haiti and other nations or transnational organizations deploy a rapid response-force, to be followed in the medium-term by a U.N.-led force. It remains unclear who would lead the rapid-action force, but the United States, Canada and France — three countries with a long history of involvement in Haiti — have all expressed skepticism in recent days.

    But the violence and lack of governance in Haiti have led to a shortage of potable water and a burgeoning cholera outbreak, alarming the international community and forcing the Biden administration — long reluctant to intervene in Haiti militarily — to acknowledge last week that the status quo has become untenable.

    If the draft resolution remains unchanged, and the Security Council adopts it, the U.N. would encourage “the immediate deployment of a multinational rapid action force to support the [Haiti National Police] as recommended in the Secretary-General’s letter,” according to the draft.

    It is still unclear whether China or Russia, two permanent members of the Security Council, will support the resolution. China has been critical in recent months of the international community’s approach to Haiti and has called for a stronger arms embargo on the Caribbean nation.

    The United States is also seeking a U.N. mechanism that will levy international sanctions against Haiti’s gang leaders.

    This week, the U.S sent an elite disaster assistance response team to Port-au-Prince, deployed a major Coast Guard vessel to patrol the Haitian coast and issued visa restrictions on prominent Haitians involved in the violence.

    On Saturday, flights from both Canada and the U.S. are expected to land at the Port-au-Prince airport carrying critical security assistance, including armed vehicles ordered by the Haitian police, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

    Read more at: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nat...267336107.html

    so the people of Haiti do not get to say they don't want their government?

    and we are to believe that the news that the former POTUS Hussein

    authorized and LEGALIZED to lie to us is suddenly telling us the truth?

    and this is conveniently timed along with their fear mongering of nuclear attack?

    do they truly believe that humanity has endless tolerance and patience?
    Last edited by iota; 16th October 2022 at 08:10. Reason: added link
    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  22. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Blacklight43 (19th October 2022), Brigantia (16th October 2022), Carlitos (16th October 2022), ClearWater (17th October 2022), justntime2learn (16th October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022), Reinhard (16th October 2022), Vangelo (16th October 2022), Vicus (22nd October 2022), wondering (16th October 2022)

  23. Link to Post #1072
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated



    OPEC+ members line up to endorse oil production cut after US coercion claim

    RNZ news reports:

    "OPEC+ member states have lined up to endorse the steep production cut agreed this month after the White House, stepping up a war of words with Saudi Arabia, accused Riyadh of coercing some other nations into supporting the move.

    The United States noted on Thursday that the cut would boost Russia's foreign earnings and suggested it had been engineered for political reasons by Saudi Arabia, which on Sunday denied it was supporting Moscow in its invasion of Ukraine.

    Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz said the kingdom was working hard to support stability and balance in oil markets, including by establishing and maintaining the agreement of the OPEC+ alliance.

    The kingdom's defence minister and King Salman's son, Prince Khalid bin Salman, also said the 5 October decision to reduce output by two million barrels per day - taken despite oil markets being tight - was unanimous and based on economic factors.

    His comments were backed by ministers of several OPEC+ member states including the United Arab Emirates.

    The Gulf state's energy minister Suhail al-Mazrouei wrote on Twitter: "I would like to clarify that the latest OPEC+ decision, which was unanimously approved, was a pure technical decision, with NO political intentions whatsoever."

    His comment followed a statement from Iraq's state oil marketer SOMO.

    "There is complete consensus among OPEC+ countries that the best approach in dealing with the oil market conditions during the current period of uncertainty and lack of clarity is a pre-emptive approach that supports market stability and provides the guidance needed for the future," SOMO said in a statement."



    Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz said the kingdom was working hard to support stability and balance in oil markets. File photo. Photo: AFP

    "Kuwait Petroleum Corporation Chief Executive Officer Nawaf Saud al-Sabah also welcomed the decision by OPEC+ - which includes other major producers, notably Russia - and said the country was keen to maintain a balanced oil markets, state news agency KUNA reported.

    Oman and Bahrain said in separate statements that OPEC had unanimously agreed on the reduction.

    Algeria's energy minister called the decision "historic" and he and OPEC Secretary General Haitham Al Ghais, visiting Algeria, expressed their full confidence in it, Algeria's Ennahar TV reported.

    Ghais later told a news conference that the organisation targeted a balance between supply and demand rather than a specific price.

    Oil inventories in major economies are at lower levels than when OPEC has cut output in the past.

    Some analysts have said recent volatility in crude markets could be remedied by a cut that would help attract investors to an underperforming market.

    US National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said on Thursday that "more than one" OPEC member had felt coerced by Saudi Arabia into the vote, adding that the cut would also increase Russia's revenues and blunt the effectiveness of sanctions imposed over its February invasion of Ukraine.

    King Salman said in an address to the kingdom's advisory Shura Council that the country was a mediator of peace and highlighted the crown prince's initiative to release POWs from Russia last month, state news agency SPA reported.

    Khalid bin Salman said on Sunday he was "astonished" by claims his country was "standing with Russia in its war with Ukraine."

    "It is telling that these false accusations did not come from the Ukrainian government," he wrote on Twitter.


    article source: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/476...%20the%20move.

    to me it is astonishing that they are NOT standing with Russia as the negative reverberations of being against them are being experienced around the globe

    that the can present themselves as mediators of peace, a peace Russia put on the table and was steadfastedly refused

    i have also seen reports that the anger of people in different countries at the rise of gas (recent post above of Haiti's revolt specifically named this as a factor) is shifting in narrative

    the new narrative specifically shifts blame from Russia to the U.S for the exuberant prices they are being charged.

    apparently, a square meter of Liquid Propane Gas that is sold within the U.S. at $8 is being sold by the U.S. at $40

    my take? our prices are high enough! i understand that the initial sell of to China has now caused OUR reserves to be at the lowest point in decades ... how about the POTUS remembers he is to work for US and maintain the impact on United States citizens as a priority instead of sending billions of dollars OUT of our country to continue a personal agenda which began with his predecessor, Hussein?

    while people in OUR country are now utilizing credit to purchase necessities like food

    below is a video in spanish detailing much of the international discussion. the captions can be adjusted to English and other languages to make the video understandable

    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  24. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Brigantia (22nd October 2022), ClearWater (17th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (19th October 2022), justntime2learn (17th October 2022), Pam (27th October 2022), Sue (Ayt) (17th October 2022), Vicus (18th October 2022)

  25. Link to Post #1073
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated



    Court Urged to Penalize Facebook Parent Company Over $24 Million

    Epoch TImes reported today:

    "A court in Washington state has been urged to make Facebook parent company Meta pay more than $24 million for intentionally violating state law.

    King County Superior Judge Douglass North recently ruled that Meta deliberately violated the state’s Commercial Advertiser Law, which mandates certain information on political advertisements be handed over when requested.

    There were 822 violations.

    Each violation can bring a fine of up to $10,000, but that amount can be tripled because of the finding that the violations were intentional

    [delete]

    Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, urged North to impose the maximum financial penalty, noting Meta’s history of not complying with the law.

    A previous case ended in a stipulated judgment that saw Meta pay a $200,000 civil penalty and $38,500 in fees.

    Quote
    “Despite this penalty,
    awareness of the Law’s requirements, and having been given a clean slate,
    Meta continued intentionally violating the Law
    from the instant the judgment in the first case was entered,” Ferguson said.
    “Meta has never provided all required information in response to any request, and in the instances where Meta provided some information beyond what is publicly available in the Ad Library, Meta’s response often took weeks or months and included redactions Meta intentionally made to obscure required information from its response to requests,” he added.

    The intentional violations come despite Meta lawyers being well-versed in campaign finance law and the company raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaigns in Washington state alone since December 2018, the filing says.

    Ferguson asked for a $24.6 million penalty to be assessed, as well as a yet-to-be-determined fee for state lawyers.

    “We have penalties for a reason,” Ferguson said in a statement. “Facebook is a repeat, intentional violator of the law. It’s a sophisticated company. Instead of accepting responsibility and apologizing for its conduct, Facebook went to court to gut our campaign finance law in order to avoid accountability. If this case doesn’t warrant a maximum penalty, what does?”

    Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    A motion on the hearing is scheduled for later in October.

    In previous court filings and oral arguments, Meta has alleged that the law itself is unconstitutional.

    “Your Honor, in 49 other states, interests of electoral transparency and integrity are typically served by imposing disclosure requirements on the political speakers, not on the platforms that those speakers use. Washington has taken a different approach and it has imposed a sweeping and burdensome disclosure requirement on neutral platforms that host political advertising,” one of its lawyers said in a hearing.

    North rejected the argument, and found the violations of the law to be intentional.

    “They didn’t really make a significant effort to try and comply, either in terms of providing any targeting information, which is clearly required by the law, or in terms of making a serious attempt to comply in a timely fashion … to provide the information available,” he said."

    read full article here

    it is inconceivable that the double standards imposed on law abiding citizens, notwithstanding a president of the United States, Donald J. Trump, is not blatantly obvious.

    how is it that this impudent individual and company is so arrogant as to flagrantly flout its disdain for compliance in the law?

    PayPal's fine of $2,500 for those that dare to stray from the accepted Social Narrative was scheduled to begin on November the 3rd.

    i think it safe to conclude that there WILL be fraud in the midterms and the fine was an intimidation tactic to SILENCE voices raised in opposition.

    thankfully, that backfired to bring about the early demise of a company who arrogantly appointed itself gatekeeper and CONTROLLER of social narrative and behavior.

    may the demise of Facebook follow suit

    as people ALL around the globe arise in unified outrage to reclaim OUR sovereignty and power

    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  26. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Blacklight43 (19th October 2022), Brigantia (22nd October 2022), ClearWater (19th October 2022), gini (21st October 2022), Inversion (19th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (19th October 2022), justntime2learn (19th October 2022), Reinhard (22nd October 2022), Sue (Ayt) (19th October 2022), Vicus (19th October 2022), wondering (19th October 2022)

  27. Link to Post #1074
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    70
    Posts
    11,540
    Thanks
    11,130
    Thanked 76,481 times in 10,816 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Insider trading uncovered: Over 2,600 senior federal officials owned or traded stocks in companies their agencies oversee
    Monday, October 17, 2022 by: Arsenio Toledo

    https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-10-...officials.html





    In perhaps the biggest revelation of insider trading ever, a Wall Street Journal investigation has found more than 2,600 officials from all over the federal government’s executive branch own or trade stocks that stand to rise or fall in value due to decisions made by their agencies.

    The investigators analyzed more than 31,000 financial disclosure forms from over 12,000 senior career employees from the executive branch of the federal government. The forms dated between 2016 and 2021 encompass both Democratic and Republican administrations. (Related: Biggest financial crime in America’s history: Billions of taxpayer dollars STOLEN from COVID-19 relief programs.)

    The financial disclosure forms include data on about 850,000 financial assets and more than 315,000 trades reported in stocks, bonds and funds by federal officials, their spouses or dependent children. The forms also showed that over 2,600 officials in 50 federal agencies and their families have disclosed owning stock in companies that have lobbied the agencies and offices that they work with. They represent more than one in every five senior federal executive officials.

    “These trades represent many potential conflicts of interest – and explicit conflicts of interest that agency officials seem to have simply swept aside and ‘waived the rules for,'” wrote Sharon Zhang for Truthout. “These stock holdings reveal that not only do officials have personal financial interest in (the) companies they are responsible for regulating, but also that they may be trading stocks at seemingly opportune times.”

    Thousands of government officials complicit in insider trading

    Of the over 2,600 government officials involved in alleged insider trading, more than 1,800 of them reported owning or trading at least one major tech stock from Facebook, Google, Apple or Amazon.

    More than 60 officials from five agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, reported trading stock in companies shortly before their departments announced actions against those companies, including enforcement actions like charges and settlements.

    In the Environmental Protection Agency, nearly one in three officials reported owning investments in companies lobbying the agency. On average, these officials held up to $2 million in shares in fossil fuel companies between 2016 and 2021.

    In the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), career executive Malcolm Bertoni disclosed that he and his wife owned stocks in 70 different pharmaceutical, diagnostics, medical device and food companies regulated by the agency in 2018 and 2019. This includes Pfizer and Takeda Pharmaceutical.

    The FDA prohibits employees, their spouses and children from investing in companies that are “significantly regulated” by the agency. All 70 companies were on the prohibited list.

    In the Department of Defense, officials from the Office of the Defense Secretary collectively owned between $1.2 to $3.4 million in stocks and other investments in defense contractors or companies for every year studied by the Wall Street Journal‘s investigation.

    The executive agency with the most insider trading allegations is the Department of the Treasury, with nearly 50 percent of all federal officials who filed public financial disclosures from 2016 to 2021 reporting investing in stocks of firms that lobby the agency.

    Across the federal government, more than 400 officials owned or traded stocks from Chinese companies, including the White House and Department of State officials. Their investments averaged between $1.9 to $6.6 million each year.

    Learn more about government corruption at Corruption.news.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  28. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Blastolabs (19th October 2022), Brigantia (22nd October 2022), ClearWater (22nd October 2022), gini (21st October 2022), Inversion (19th October 2022), iota (19th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (20th October 2022), justntime2learn (19th October 2022), Reinhard (22nd October 2022), Sue (Ayt) (19th October 2022), wondering (19th October 2022)

  29. Link to Post #1075
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,545
    Thanks
    53,951
    Thanked 138,046 times in 23,978 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Biden Admin Quietly Makes Reversal on Student Loan Forgiveness Program
    235,561 views Premiered Oct 19, 2022
    19K
    Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov
    863K subscribers

    🔥 EXCLUSIVE: Data From Pfizer’s 8 Mice 👉 https://epochtim.es/xNWt9EE

    Resources:

    🔵 Claim $2500 of free silver from American Hartford Gold:

    https://ept.ms/3biH9MN.

    🔵 Roman's Instagram:

    https://ept.ms/2VW5HST

    🔵 6 States Lawsuit:

    https://ept.ms/3SjJSrc

    🔵 Government Website:

    https://ept.ms/3SgRJ8Q

    🔵 Reversal Analysis:

    https://ept.ms/3DdORFQ

    🔵 Cost of Program:

    https://ept.ms/3SvzRrj

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (21st October 2022), Brigantia (22nd October 2022), Johnnycomelately (22nd October 2022), justntime2learn (25th October 2022), Reinhard (22nd October 2022), Sue (Ayt) (22nd October 2022), wondering (21st October 2022)

  31. Link to Post #1076
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,545
    Thanks
    53,951
    Thanked 138,046 times in 23,978 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Steve Bannon Sentenced to 4 Months in Prison; Desantis: No Covid Vax Mandate for Florida Kids
    15,745 views 10/21/22
    768
    NTD
    1.29M subscribers

    Special Report: Behind the Trump Raid👉👉https://ept.ms/TrumpSpecial0812YT

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Brigantia (22nd October 2022), gini (21st October 2022), Johnnycomelately (22nd October 2022), Reinhard (22nd October 2022), wondering (22nd October 2022)

  33. Link to Post #1077
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,545
    Thanks
    53,951
    Thanked 138,046 times in 23,978 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    Committee can’t find a lawyer to accept Trump subpoena; Republicans vow to not mandate child vax
    6,122 views
    10/21/22
    1.7K
    Front Page with Scott Goulet
    229K subscribers

    "The U.S. House committee voted to subpoena former President Trump last week, but it has not actually issued the subpoena. Here’s why.

    Recently, one of New York Mayor Eric Adams' aides, revealed the true situation in New York City, in a secret video of Project Veritas.

    CDC advisers voted to recommend adding vaccines to the child and adolescent immunization schedules. Meanwhile Republican governors have said they will not implement the CDC's latest policy. These counter moves are more or less inspired and influenced by President Trump. Here’s why.

    Elon Musk is planning to lay off up to 75% of Twitter staff after the deal is completed."

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (22nd October 2022), Brigantia (22nd October 2022), ClearWater (22nd October 2022), DNA (22nd October 2022), gini (22nd October 2022), Reinhard (22nd October 2022)

  35. Link to Post #1078
    Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    46,568
    Thanked 35,398 times in 4,672 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    ...

    ... Feds Are Handing Control of US to China 30:02

    Forbidden Knowledge TV
    25 mins ago

    It was a Hell of a week for people who care about the future of this country, let alone the future of the human species.

    During the same week that the CDC voted unanimously to add the COVID-19 vaccine to the Child Immunization Schedule, granting manufacturers immunity from all liability for adverse events in both children and adults, we also learned that Boston University did gain-of-function research using an NIH grant of $1.1 million of taxpayer money to combine the Omicron and original Wuhan strains — resulting in an 80% lethality rate in lab mice.

    [...]

    What all of this looks like to me is not that it’s not so much that China is “spying” on us or that China is “stealing” our elections. What it looks like is that our Federal Government is handing over our country to the CCP. We saw it in Afghanistan. We’re seeing it with the Biden Crime Family and we’re seeing it with our elections. Hell, we’ve seen it for the past 30 years, with the offshoring of our industrial base to China.

    I guess the proof will be in the pudding on November 8th and we don’t see the Red Wave.

    The question is why? Is it because of systematic blackmail? Is it because the CCP owns a lot of our Treasuries and the dollar isn’t really worth anything anymore? Japan own 30% more US Treasuries than China and we don’t see them infiltrating out government and stealing our elections.

    Maybe we are one nation under blackmail, as Whitney Webb suggests.

    Contributed by Alexandra Bruce

    Full article: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/fed...f-us-to-china/

  36. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    ClearWater (22nd October 2022), gini (23rd October 2022), iota (23rd October 2022), justntime2learn (23rd October 2022), Tintin (22nd October 2022), Vangelo (22nd October 2022)

  37. Link to Post #1079
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,577 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated



    Fauci testifies during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Capitol Hill in Washington


    Judge Orders Fauci, Psaki,
    Top Officials Be Deposed
    in Big Tech Censorship Case

    the Epoch Times Reports:

    "A federal court on Friday ordered Dr. Anthony Fauci and other top officials to testify under oath at depositions in a case that’s uncovered evidence of alleged federal government collusion with big tech companies to censor users.

    The attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri and other plaintiffs allege that Fauci, director of NIAID and President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, and other defendants, colluded and coerced social media companies to “suppress disfavored speakers, viewpoints, and content” regarding COVID-19.

    U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty went a step further than a previous ruling that forced written testimonies and ordered Fauci and other defendants to testify under oath at depositions.

    “After finding documentation of a collusive relationship between the Biden Administration and social media companies to censor free speech, we immediately filed a motion to get these officials under oath,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt said in a statement.

    “It is high time we shine a light on this censorship enterprise and force these officials to come clean to the American people, and this ruling will allow us to do just that. We’ll keep pressing for the truth.”




    "New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) joined the lawsuit in August, representing renowned epidemiologists Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, as well as Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines.

    NCLA attorney Jenin Younes said she looks forward to learning just how far the accused government officials went to push their COVID-19 “perspective.”

    “For the first time, Dr. Fauci and seven other federal officials responsible for running an unlawful censorship enterprise will have to answer questions under oath about the nature and extent of their communications with tech companies,” said Younes in a statement to The Epoch Times.

    The judge also ordered the depositions of former White House press secretary Jen Psaki, Director of White House Digital Strategy Rob Flaherty, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, CISA Director Jen Easterly, and FBI Supervisory Special Agent Elvis Chan."




    Protesters hold signs denouncing Facebook and CEO Mark Zuckerberg
    at the Humanity Against Censorship rally in front of Meta headquarters
    in Menlo Park, Calif. on May 19, 2022. (Mrs. Hao/The Epoch Times)


    Fauci’s ‘Self-Serving Blanket Denials’


    "In his ruling, Doughty said he agreed with plaintiffs that Fauci’s previous “self-serving blanket denials” about his role in censoring views on social media couldn’t be taken at face value.

    “Plaintiffs argue that even if Dr. Fauci can prove he never communicated with social media platforms about censorship, there are compelling reasons that suggest Dr. Fauci has acted through intermediaries, and acted on behalf of others, in procuring the social-media censorship of credible scientific opinions.

    “Plaintiffs argue that even if Dr. Fauci acted indirectly or as an intermediary on behalf of others, it is still relevant to Plaintiffs’ preliminary injunction motion. The Court agrees.

    “Lastly, Plaintiffs argue that Dr. Fauci’s credibility has been in question on matters related to supposed COVID-19 ‘misinformation’ since 2020. Specifically, Plaintiffs state that Dr. Fauci has made public statements on the efficacy of masks, the percentage of the population needed for herd immunity, NIAID’s funding of ‘gain-of-function’ virus research in Wuhan, the lab-leak theory, and more.

    “Plaintiffs urge that his comments on these important issues are relevant to the matter at hand and are further reasons why Dr. Fauci should be deposed. Plaintiffs assert that they should not be required to simply accept Dr. Fauci’s ‘self-serving blanket denials’ that were issued from someone other than himself at face value. The Court agrees,” Doughty said in his ruling (pdf)."







    Security personnel outside Wuhan Institute during the visit by the World Health Organization (WHO)
    team tasked with investigating origins of COVID-19, in Wuhan,China, on Feb. 3, 2021. (Thomas Peter/Reuters)



    Censoring Lab Leak Theory


    The plaintiffs argued that Fauci allegedly insisted on the censorship of “speech backed by great scientific credibility and with enormous potential nationwide impact” that contradicted Fauci’s views.

    Fauci, for example, communicated in a long-shielded phone call with some scientists to discredit any theory that COVID-19 was the result of a “lab leak” in Wuhan, China. The scientists went on to write a paper severely reprimanding others who were open to the theory.

    If the lab leak theory were true, in turn, it would mean Fauci could be potentially implicated in funding the research on viruses that caused the pandemic which killed millions worldwide, plaintiffs argued. This is because Fauci funded risky “gain-of-function” research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through intermediaries such as EcoHealth Alliance.

    In late January 2020 and early February 2020, Fauci was also in touch with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in oral communications about the government’s COVID-19 response. Facebook then allegedly went on censor the lab leak theory, plaintiffs argued."




    White House press secretary Jen Psaki speaks during a White House press briefing
    at the White House in Washington on May 4, 2022. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)


    ‘Overwhelming’ Need to Depose Officials


    The court also found that Flaherty, Slavitt, Psaki, and other officials also have personal knowledge about the alleged censorship issues and ordered them to be deposed."

    Doughty said there is an “overwhelming” need for Flaherty to be deposed to determine whether fundamental rights to free speech were “abridged” as a result of alleged collusion between senior Biden administration officials and Big Tech.

    Plaintiffs argued Flaherty had “extensive” oral meetings with Twitter, Meta, and YouTube on vaccine hesitancy and combatting misinformation related to COVID-19.

    The judge said there is a “substantive need” for the deposition of Slavitt, who served as the White House’s senior COVID-19 advisor. Doughty noted Slavitt’s remarks on a podcast which “showed he has specific knowledge as it relates” to the issues in the lawsuit.

    The court order cited a series of public comments made by Psaki when she served as White House press secretary, including calling on social media platforms for consistency in banning disfavored speakers.

    “Psaki has made a number of statements that are relevant to the Government’s involvement in a number of social-media platforms’ efforts to censor its users across the board for sharing information related to COVID-19,” Doughty said in his ruling."

    full article here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/judge-...e_4813336.html

    ***


    wow!! they are being held responsible!

    they've got overwhelming evidence of Fauci WITHOUT his deposition!

    heck! many of us, or ANYONE who has experienced being shut down and shut up

    could provide supporting evidence AND could very well lawyer up

    as i just mentioned (here)

    it isn't what they DO that matters ...

    it is OUR RESPONSE that does

    speaking of which?

    Trump is Suing Pulitzer for Giving Prize to Fake News Reporters

    this move?

    PRICELESS


    Last edited by iota; 23rd October 2022 at 06:16.
    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  38. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Alecs (23rd October 2022), Arcturian108 (29th October 2022), Brigantia (28th October 2022), ClearWater (27th October 2022), DaveToo (23rd October 2022), DNA (27th October 2022), fifi (24th October 2022), gini (23rd October 2022), Inversion (23rd October 2022), Johnnycomelately (29th October 2022), justntime2learn (23rd October 2022), pyrangello (23rd October 2022), Reinhard (23rd October 2022), Vangelo (23rd October 2022), wondering (23rd October 2022)

  39. Link to Post #1080
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,545
    Thanks
    53,951
    Thanked 138,046 times in 23,978 posts

    Default Re: BREAKING NEWS ~ Continuously Updated

    CDC Adds COVID Jab to Childhood Immunization Schedule
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    CDC Adds COVID Jab to Childhood Immunization Schedule
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    October 28, 2022
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...bid=1631310771

    (Here it is at last. There can be no doubt now that they are coming for the children.)


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/usjMbIkG0k0R/


    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    Unlicensed COVID-19 shots will be added to the U.S. childhood, adolescent and adult vaccine schedules after a unanimous (15-0) vote by the U.S. CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
    By adding the shots to the vaccine schedule, it paves the way for U.S. schools to mandate them for attendance
    Pfizer and Moderna, the shots’ makers, will also be granted permanent legal indemnity, which otherwise would have disappeared once COVID-19 shots were no longer protected under emergency use authorization
    Once the CDC recommends a shot for “routine administration to children or pregnant women,” it becomes liability free
    Even though COVID-19 shots have been added to the childhood vaccine schedule, they haven’t been mandated for school attendance in most states — yet. In the event that they are — and even before that — it’s time for dissent and a complete overhaul of the CDC

    Unlicensed COVID-19 shots will be added to the U.S. childhood, adolescent and adult vaccine schedules after a unanimous (15-0) vote by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

    The move is likely to shatter whatever remaining trust Americans had in the CDC — “as it should,” said Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology.1 “I am shocked by the malfeasance. I have no trust left at all in our public health system. It is broken.”

    By adding the shots to the vaccine schedule, it paves the way for U.S. schools to require them for attendance. The shots were also added to the Vaccine for Children (VFC) program, which provides vaccines to children at no or low cost using federal funding.2 Pfizer and Moderna, the shots’ makers, will also be granted permanent legal indemnity, which otherwise would have disappeared once COVID-19 shots were no longer protected under emergency use authorization (EUA).3

    Other Countries Refuse to Give COVID Shots to Kids
    Many countries around the world have already walked back their recommendations to give COVID-19 shots to kids, as it became apparent that they may cause deadly side effects and are far less effective than promised.

    In January 2022, Sweden’s Health Agency recommended against COVID-19 jabs for kids aged 5 to 11, stating the benefits do not outweigh the risks.4 Denmark also no longer recommends COVID-19 shots for children under 18,5 and in September 2022, England announced it would no longer offer COVID-19 shots to children unless they’re high risk.6

    Meanwhile, in the U.S., the CDC added COVID-19 jabs to the new childhood vaccination schedule on October 17, 20227 — days before the ACIP’s actual vote.

    “When the CDC briefer … was asked how CDC could add an EUA (unlicensed) vaccine to the schedule, she said something like, ‘We checked with OGC [Office of General Counsel] and they said it was OK.’ And that was that. No legal justification. No moral or ethical justification. And definitely no medical or scientific justification,” Dr. Meryl Nass, a board-certified internal medicine physician with special expertise in vaccine safety and vaccine mandates, wrote on her blog.8

    Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, also asked Grace Lee, ACIP committee chair, if she wanted to see data from Israel showing the COVID-19 shots are not safe. She did not. According to Kirsch:9

    “These people do not want to see any data that shows the vaccines are not safe … She [Lee] refused to answer my Yes or No question on this important data and called the cops on me (even though I didn’t violate any laws). I have it all on video. That is the level of corruption we are dealing with here: ‘scientists’ who simply look the other way when asked if they want to see the safety data.”

    Quote Jamie Sale
    11.4K Tweets
    See new Tweets
    Jamie Sale

    @JamieSale
    World Champion +Olympic Gold medalist🇨🇦 Freedom fighter Canadians For Truth
    edmonton alberta cancanadiansfortruth.caBorn April 21Joined September 2010
    457 Following
    78.7K Followers
    Pfizer, Moderna Get Full Liability Protection
    Vaccine makers have nothing to lose by marketing experimental COVID-19 shots, even if they cause serious injury and death, as they enjoy full indemnity against injuries occurring from COVID-19 shots or any other pandemic jab under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, passed in the U.S. in 2005. As reported by investigative journalist Jordan Schachtel:10

    “In March 2020, the federal government invoked the PREP Act, which gave Pfizer and Moderna a tort liability shield due to the declared ‘public health emergency,’ which the government is reportedly going to revoke in early 2023. The companies’ emergency use authorization shots have since been protected by the federal government through this 2005 congressional action.”

    Once the shots’ EUA status was revoked, they would need to seek FDA approval; however, it’s suspected that this has been purposely delayed to protect Pfizer and Moderna from facing legal liability for injuries caused by COVID-19 shots. However, once the CDC recommends a shot for “routine administration to children or pregnant women,” it becomes liability-free. Schachtel explained:11

    “By adding the shots to the childhood schedule, the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) will transfer liability for vaccine injuries to the federal government’s National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), allowing for Pfizer and Moderna to finally bring an FDA approved shot to the market without opening itself up to lawsuits.

    Moreover, it will act as another windfall for companies that have already brought in hundreds of billions of dollars in revenues, by requiring these vaccinations for children who attend public schools.

    … Over the course of COVID Mania, Pfizer and Moderna have raked in hundreds of billions of dollars in liability free dollars, enriching their executives and board members beyond their wildest dreams.

    Thanks to Big Pharma’s successful regulatory capture of Government Health, and corrupt bureaucrats’ willing compliance, it looks like the mRNA drug cartel will be completely off the hook when it comes to compensating the countless Americans who were harmed by their junk products.”

    Timeline to Prevent Liability Gaps
    Now that COVID-19 shots have been added to the schedule, expect to see the end of the public health “emergency.” “The ‘emergency’ can now end,” Kirsch said. “They needed the emergency to be able to create EUA approval which gave them liability protection as long as the emergency existed. The emergency is no longer needed. The vaccine makers can now manufacture fully ‘approved’ vaccines and have complete liability protection forever.”12

    It's interesting to note, however, that the day before the ACIP vote, Dr. José Romero, the CDC’s director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said that the CDC was not adding COVID-19 shots to the childhood schedule.

    By the next morning, the CDC revealed that it was, in fact, adding them.13 “CDC tried to hide what it was doing until the last minute,” Nass wrote.14 The question is, why? Why did the CDC make the announcement now, when it doesn’t go into effect until 2023?

    The answer could lie in creating the perfect timeline to prevent any gaps in liability for the vaccine makers. Nass explained:

    “The EUAs disappear when the emergency stops (the declarations stop, and they are being renewed every 3 months). So yes, they want to be ready for the ending of the emergency, and they want to seamlessly shift liability to the other liability shield, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

    But that did not seem to require any action at this time. What might require action is licensing the vaccines. Could it be possible that the FDA folk have said they won’t be issuing any more licenses any time soon? There have not been announcements that Pfizer and Moderna have filed the paperwork for licenses. Because, despite everything that has happened, legally you really cannot mandate an experimental product.

    If I were the mfrs’ or government’s lawyers, I would be making sure that the transition from CICP [Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program] to VICP could happen instantaneously, with no moment in time during which the mfrs and government program planners were subject to liability. Putting it on the childhood schedule is necessary to move the vaccine to the VICP.”

    Will COVID-19 Shots Become Mandatory to Attend US Schools?
    As far back as fall 2021, 60% of U.S. parents opposed adding COVID-19 shots to list of required shots for school.15 ACIP isn’t focused on appeasing parents’ wishes, however. ACIP committee member Dr. Nirav Shah, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention, told CNN that adding COVID-19 shots to the CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule would not impact which vaccines are required for school entrance:16

    “We recognize that there is concern around this, but moving Covid-19 to the recommended immunization schedule does not impact what vaccines are required for school entrance, if any … Indeed, there are vaccines that are on the schedule right now that are not required for school attendance in many jurisdictions, such as seasonal influenza. Local control matters, and we honor that.

    The decision around school entrance for vaccines rests where it did before, which is with the state level, the county level and at the municipal level, if it exists at all. They are the arbiters of what vaccines are required, if any, for school entry. This discussion does not change that.”

    This is lip service, however. California and Washington, D.C., have already announced that COVID-19 shots would be mandatory for students,17 and others are sure to follow. Malone said:18

    “Mainstream media is pretending that states determine what vaccines are used, but the truth is that pediatricians use the CDC schedule and state public health officials use this schedule. State public health systems use the schedule to determine which vaccines to require for children to enter schools.

    Yes, some states have more stringent requirements than others. Some states allow for ‘opt-outs,’ but in the end, most states follow the CDC guidelines. The ACIP functionally establishes ‘standard of care’ in this area. Therefore, we can expect an even bigger home schooling and private schooling boom.”

    Governors from several U.S. states, however, have already spoken out, vowing not to mandate COVID-19 shots for schoolchildren. Among them:19

    Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who stated, “As long as I am governor, in Florida there will not be a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for children in our schools. That is your decision to make as a parent. These are new shots. I get a kick out of it when people compare to MMR — things that have been around for decades and decades.”
    Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee, who tweeted, “I’ve always said mandates are the wrong approach, & TN has led in pushing back on federal covid vaccine requirements. Thanks to our work with the General Assembly, TN families won’t be impacted by today’s CDC vote. We'll continue to stand for TN children & for personal freedom.”
    Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, who similarly said, “Regardless of what the CDC says, as long as I am governor, we will never force kids to get a COVID vaccine to go to school.”
    Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, who stated, “Here in Alabama, the parents make decisions when it comes to their children’s health care. We do NOT mandate the covid shot for kids — nor will we ever.”
    Sen. Rand Paul also condemned the CDC’s decision, calling it “appalling”: “This is the same committee that approved booster vaccines for children despite no evidence that COVID boosters reduce transmission, hospitalization or death among children. Appalling!”20

    The CDC Is Corrupt and Can’t Be Trusted




    The video above was produced in 2015, but it’s still relevant today and explains how bribery is effectively legalized in the U.S., affecting laws that are meant to serve the people — but which actually serve corporate donors.

    The CDC cannot accept “commercial support,” but its foundation — The National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — does accept “donations” for the benefit of public health.21

    A foundation is a nongovernmental entity that is typically established to make grants to institutions or individuals for scientific and other purposes. Donors often give money to foundations instead of to the institution itself, in part, because foundations have a fiduciary responsibility to represent the donor’s interest.

    As reported by “A Midwestern Doctor” on Substack, who remains anonymous, the CDC Foundation has received close to $1 billion from corporate donors. Historical examples of these corrupt donations include $60,000 a pesticide research firm prove the safety of two pesticides and more than $1 million from Coca-Cola, which in turn received advice from a CDC staffer on how to stop efforts to reduce sugar consumption worldwide.22

    So, finding out who funds The CDC Foundation gives clues as to where their allegiance lies — and why the CDC and ACIP have voted to approve every vaccine presented to them, even when evidence suggested they do otherwise. Who’s funding the CDC? Here’s a short list:23

    Vaccine profiteers — The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI Alliance (created by Gates) and Imperial College London
    Vaccine Manufacturers — Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson Foundation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Gilead (remdesivir’s manufacturer)
    Big Tech — Facebook, Google, Microsoft, PayPal
    Further, many ACIP and CDC members have owned patents on the vaccines they’ve voted in favor of. “Despite this,” a Midwestern Doctor noted, “They always claim these massive financial conflicts of interest they held have not clouded their judgment on which vaccines they approved (which is technically true since they almost always approve every vaccine that comes their way).

    Providing royalty payments to bureaucrats responsible for pharmaceutical approvals is a slippery slope that consistently incentives everyone within the federal bureaucracy to push through dangerous and ineffective products.”24

    They added the commonly held belief that the move to add COVID-19 shots to the childhood vaccination schedule was done despite the adverse effects it will have on children — for the protection of the CDC’s funders, vaccine manufacturers:25

    “Many outside observers suspect this approval was done to shield the vaccine manufacturers from the inevitable liability they were facing from the explosion of severe injuries from the vaccines and mounting evidence the vaccines were fraudulently marketed (e.g. they are not effective at preventing COVID-19 or transmission of the disease).

    By being added to the schedule, this affords the COVID-19 manufacturers the absurd protection that was enshrined by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act a law (brokered by Fauci) that removed the ability of those harmed by vaccines to sue vaccine manufacturers for their injuries (and for parents of vaccine injured children to receive any support or compensation for many vaccine complications).”

    They’re Going After Kids for Liability Protection
    Ron Paul put it simply when he spoke about the CDC on the “Liberty Report”: “They’re not our friends. They’re not friends of liberty. They’re not friends of medicine. They’re certainly not friends of kids. But do you know who their best friends are? The pharmaceutical companies.”26

    The addition of COVID-19 jabs to the childhood vaccine schedule shows the CDC has closed its eyes to the risks these shots pose and is moving forward to protect its friends at all costs. “Now there is no question whether these are public health professionals carefully considering decisions for 334 million people. They are careerists who love vaccines and are blind to the consequences of their actions. Blind is putting it charitably,” Nass said.27

    In a clip on Mikhaila Peterson’s podcast, shared by the “Liberty Report,” Robert Kennedy Jr. lays out exactly why the CDC is intent on making COVID-19 shots routine for children:28

    “So they’re never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine, without getting liability protection. And now, the Emergency Use Authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and the CARES Act.

    So as long as … you take an emergency use, you can’t sue them. Once they get approved, now you can sue ’em, unless they can get it recommended for children. Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children get it, liability protection. Even if an adult gets that vaccine. That’s why they’re going after kids.”

    At this point, even though COVID-19 shots have been added to the childhood vaccine schedule, they haven’t been mandated for school attendance in most states — yet. In the event that they are — and even before that — it’s time for dissent. “This is regulatory agencies and their advisory committees gone amuck,” Nass said. “Time for the people to stop consenting.”

    Malone added, “Where do we go from here? It is time for an overhaul of the CDC, the ACIP, the FDA, NIH, NIAID and the whole HHS enterprise. It is time for parents to take control back from the state.”29 "

    - Sources and References
    1 Substack, Who is Robert Malone October 19, 2022
    2, 19, 20 ZeroHedge October 21, 2022
    3, 10, 11 Substack, The Dossier October 18, 2022
    4 Reuters January 28, 2022
    5 AP August 18, 2022
    6 FEE Stories September 14, 2022
    7 U.S. CDC Interim COVID-19 Immunization Schedule October 17, 2022
    8, 13, 27 Substack, Meryl’s COVID Newsletter October 20, 2022
    9, 12 Substack, Steve Kirsch’s Newsletter October 20, 2022
    14 Substack, Meryl’s COVID Newsletter October 22, 2022
    15, 18, 29 Substack, Who Is Robert Malone October 20, 2022
    16, 17 CNN October 20, 2022
    21, 22, 23, 24, 25 Substack, The Forgotten Side of Medicine October 20, 2022
    26 Rumble, The Ron Paul Liberty Report October 18, 2022, 0:28
    28 Rumble, The Ron Paul Liberty Report October 18, 2022, 6:00
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Brigantia (28th October 2022), gini (28th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (29th October 2022), wondering (28th October 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 54 of 209 FirstFirst 1 4 44 54 64 104 154 209 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts