Posted by Mashika
(here)
Posted by Tintin
(here)
Posted by thepainterdoug
(here)
Te Canadien Prepper weighs in on latest developments as it appears USA is ready to enter the War.
Apologies if already posted, just delete if so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OyIPj1QaSs
Also , I
learned from an intel source that there are no longer tactical nukes. That modern conventional weapons achieve the same so no need for them. Only the big nukes exist and they are not fission bombs as in Hiroshima etc, but fusion bombs so minimal radiation persists. So I was told.
Thanks for that. That was my understanding as well, which, although I have sincere concerns about the nutcases running (or ruining) Ukraine and that they actually would be mad enough to do a "dirty bomb", is kind of reassuring, in that there may well not be a nuclear standoff of any kind. (Picking this up before seeing any subsequent posts).
You know, Putin knows that the west knows, that Putin knows, that the west know that they both know this
This is where we enter the world of theatre.
If it matters at all it should be borne in mind, and remembered, that Russia as the world's custodian of perhaps the second largest stockpile of global nuclear armaments would have
no need at all to employ a "dirty bomb" as much as the freaks in the intelligence owned media and the doorknobs in Ukraine may try and spin otherwise.
Kind of a no brainer
Anyway, thanks for what you've shared here; it is reassuring, actually.
Tactical nukes will remain in existence in Russia because there are hundreds of nuclear silos across all post-soviet republics that are 'hidden' from the world, but that Russian military know very well, these are capable of enduring any kind of surface nuclear explosion and are 10 or so levels down earth, and some interconnected across the region so that even if one falls, it is closed down to prevent contamination to the other ones and the people operating over the fallen one can move to one of the others
Only the top levels of the military know the routes, locations and configurations of those nuclear protected sites
To damage one of those, you need a missile that can go through and down into the actual silo, and not just explode at the surface or half a kilometer above it so as to create a massive explosion that destroys an entire city. You need something that pierces through the concrete and goes down at least one or two levels and then explodes inside. And that's why tactical nukes will remain around
Also, as a side note, Russia has more nuclear warheads than all other nuclear powers in the world combined, but just as with the other ones, not all of them are fully ready or 'functional' , most are in storage, same as for the US, because it is almost impossible to keep them all fully functional, so you keep the very necessary ones in full active mode and rotate them but let's say you need 1000 active at any time, then you may have around 2500 fully ready and active ones, and 10,000 more in storage all over the country
There is also the fact that Russia/US took the 3000+ nuclear bombs Ukraine had, and then it also took around another 4000 or so smaller tactical ones i believe, and also took all the enriched uranium that could be used to create new bombs. Also, all Ukrainian nuclear bombers where destroyed at the time the USSR disbanded, and all nuclear launcher silos were also destroyed. As for the missiles or warheads, the ones taken back to Russia, were they actually destroyed? Or...
because if not we are talking about having some, at least, 5000 nuclear warheads 'misplaced' somewhere, and that could easily be restored to functional state, as neither the US or Russia have any accountability to any other country in the world about that kind of stuff, so no one knows what truly happened with that giant stock of nuclear bombs
This is something i think i said before on my "Ukraine is a Nazi state" thread, the fact that Ukraine got fooled by both the US and Russia and from being the third nuclear power in the world, went into beggar state, must be very hard for them to deal with. And no one can change that, not even the US, and that's why they feel entitled to get all they demand from the west, they basically put the weight of that bad choice into the US and allies. If they had kept their bombs, missiles, silos and bombers, Ukraine would possibly be right now one of the richest, most powerful countries in the world, but.... Russia and the US conspired against Ukraine to fool them and steal all the nuclear power from them. The truth is, no one knows what happened after with all that stuff they took away
So for Ukraine to be able to even build a dirty bomb, they would need help from the outside, as the nuclear fuel is very controlled and they would have to explain any missing fuel that could be used to create a dirty bomb. Unless of course the UN and associates are "in" on the dirty bomb conspiracy plan...
Et tu, Brute? 
Re: WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia
Reply With Quote
Really educational. 
Bookmarks