Vaccine Crimes

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/runews/status/1644993224736489473

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/nbreavington/sta...95723673722886

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/09/p...ovid-vaccines/

BREAKING: Secret Documents published by order of the U.S. Federal Court prove Pfizer, the FDA & Fact Checkers lied when they said Toxic Graphene Oxide was not inside the Covid-19 Vaccines
The Exposé
April 9, 2023

Graphene Oxide is a fairly new substance not yet well understood. But what we do know is that studies have proven it can be toxic to cells and tissues in the body. And further studies have shown Graphene Oxide to have toxic effects on blood cells, inducing oxidative stress and inflammation.

This is why it’s concerning to find Graphene Oxide (GO) has been in and out of the news for the past two years in relation to the COVID-19 vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

Several independent studies conducted by doctors and scientists have confirmed that Graphene Oxide is in fact present in these vaccines. But the manufacturers, medicine regulators and so called Fact-Checkers have refuted these claims, most likely due to the known toxic effects it has on the body.

For instance, Reuters, which essentially supplies the news to the entire Western world without most people realising it, stated in a fact-check article published July 23rd 2021, that it is impossible for the Covid vaccines to contain Graphene Oxide because they would be either dark brown or black in colour, instead of the clear/yellowish colour they are.

But what Reuter’s Fact Checkers failed to mention is that when Graphene Oxide is combined with other ingredients, such as Sucrose, a listed ingredient of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, it’s perfectly possible to produce a clear or yellowish liquid.

But at the time of writing, Reuters did not have access to a document published in February 2023 by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) by order of the U.S. Federal Court.

A document that was submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to gain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

A document that confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

The Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is an injection that contains genetic material called mRNA that invades the cells in your body and instructs them to produce the Spike (S) protein allegedly found on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

It is a highly complex “vaccine” that involves a multi-step manufacturing process that includes the production and purification of messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules and the formulation and packaging of the vaccine.

And according to Pfizer, it is required during the manufacturing process of its Covid-19 vaccine. But we only know this thanks to a U.S. Federal Court Judge ordering the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to publish all the documents that Pfizer submitted to gain Emergency Use Authorization.

For those who don’t know, the Covid-19 injections had not completed phase 3 and 4 trials, so could not be fully approved in December 2020. Instead, they had to be authorized for emergency use only. This is why it’s criminal that they extended the EUA to children, considering they are at little to no risk of suffering anything more severe than the common cold if infected with the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.

If the Federal Court Judge had not forced the FDA to publish the documents, they wouldn’t have seen the light of day for 75 years. Because this is the length of time the FDA requested they be given to publish the documents under the Freedom of Information Act.

However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.

And in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.

The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”

In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most concerning about the study is the confirmation on page 7 that Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –


Source – Page 7
Therefore, during the manufacturing process, several factors could potentially introduce contaminants or foreign materials into the vaccine. This obviously includes the possibility of varying amounts of Graphene Oxide (GO) entering the final product.

One potential source of Graphene Oxide contamination could be the use of raw materials or reagents that contain the toxic substance or other graphene-based materials.

For example, if one of the reagents used in the manufacturing process contains Graphene Oxide as a contaminant, this could potentially introduce Graphene Oxide into the vaccine.

Similarly, if the equipment used in the manufacturing process is not properly cleaned or validated, this could lead to Graphene Oxide contamination of the vaccine.

Another potential source of Graphene Oxide contamination could be through the use of filters or other materials used to sterilize or purify the vaccine.

While these materials are designed to remove contaminants and foreign materials, they could potentially introduce Graphene Oxide into the vaccine if they are not properly designed or validated.

In October 2021, The Expose team published an investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). We found that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times.

At the time, as you can see from the above chart, just 4% of the batches of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine produced were responsible for every single death reported to the CDC as being due to Pfizer Covid-19 vaccination.

Could it be that these batches of the Pfizer vaccine had a yellowish colour and therefore a higher concentration of Graphene Oxide?

Because just a few months prior, Reuters published a fact check that claimed the Covid-19 vaccines do not contain Graphene Oxide, and provided the following explanation as to why –


But Reuters “forgot” to mention something important about sucrose and how its presence in the Pfizer vaccine could result in a transparent or slightly yellowish liquid when combined with Graphene Oxide.

Sucrose is a type of sugar that is commonly used in food and pharmaceutical products as a stabilizer and preservative. In the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, sucrose allegedly helps to maintain the stability and efficacy of the mRNA molecules in the vaccine.

When mixed with Graphene Oxide it can produce a transparent or yellowish liquid depending on the amount of Graphene Oxide present.

But it’s also possible that other officially listed ingredients of the Pfizer vaccine – lipids, potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate – could produce a transparent/yellowish liquid when combined with Grahene Oxide.

It all depends on on the concentration of Graphene Oxide and the interactions between the different components.

This is a concerning fact considering many mainstream news sources in the UK and USA rely on Reuters for their news content.

Some of the major news sources in the UK that use Reuters content include the BBC, The Guardian, The Times, The Daily Telegraph, and The Independent.

Meanwhile in the USA, Reuters content is used by many news outlets, including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, Fox News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal.

This proves that Reuters essentially have a monopoly on the mainstream news in the West, and we’ve just proven that they are quite happy to lie to you.

But for anyone who has chosen to get the Covid-19 vaccine, or not for that matter, the fact the mainstream media lie to you should be the least of your worries.

Because there have been several studies that have shown that Graphene Oxide (GO) can be taken up by cells and tissues in the body, and there is a major concern that it may accumulate in certain organs or tissues over time.

Here are just a few examples of such studies:

In a study published in the journal Nature Nanotechnology in 2014, researchers injected mice with GO and found that it accumulated in the lungs, liver, and spleen. The study also found that the accumulation of GO caused damage to the mice’s lungs and immune systems.
In another study published in the journal ACS Nano in 2016, researchers exposed human lung cells to GO and found that the GO was taken up by blood cells and caused oxidative stress and inflammation.
A review article published in the journal Nano Today in 2017 summarized the findings of several studies on the toxicity of GO. The article noted that GO can be taken up by cells and tissues in the body and has been shown to accumulate in the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. The article also noted that the toxicity of GO appears to be dependent on several factors, including the size, shape, and surface chemistry of the Graphene Oxide.
The study published in the journal ACD Nano in 2016 is of particular concern when we look at the findings of a study conducted by Dr. Philippe van Welbergen of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in which he concluded Graphene Oxide was being transmitted from the COVID vaccinated to the unvaccinated, destroying red blood cells & causing strange blood Clots.

At the beginning of July 2021, Dr. Philippe, was interviewed on a South African community channel, Loving Life TV. He explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.

Their blood had unusual tube-like structures, some particles which lit up and many damaged cells. Few healthy cells were visible. Until three months earlier, he had never seen these formations in blood. We now know these tube-like structures are graphene.

Since then, Dr. Philippe has been a regular guest on Loving Life TV: blowing the whistle on the experimental Covid injection roll-out; providing updates on the increasing damage being done to blood by the experimental Covid injections over time; and, giving updates on the Covid situation in the UK and South Africa.

On 12 February 2022, Dr. Philippe returned again to Loving Life TV to release images of his latest slides of blood samples. The live stream was lengthy so Loving Life TV separated it into two parts.

Part One is a discussion including answers to the audience’s questions.

In Part Two, Dr. Philippe presents the images of his latest blood slides and explains what the images are showing. He discusses nearly 100 blood slides from both “vaccinated” and vaccine-free patients. His slides show that vaccine-free patients have been “infected with vaccine toxins through shedding.”

Below is a short clip from Part Two courtesy of The Timeline Post channel on Telegram.

Dr Philippe (Part Two), The Blood Slides, 12 February 2022
Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.


The rest of the article with pictures is here,

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/09/p...ovid-vaccines/

[onawah]

How Many Millions Are Disabled or Injured From the Jab?
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
April 11, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...bid=1769759438

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The 2022 U.S. Vaccine Damage Report revealed a sobering glimpse into the true carnage that occurred at the hands of the COVID-19 shot campaign
COVID-19 shots resulted in 300,000 excess deaths, 26.6 million injuries and 1.36 million disabilities
Total economic costs due to the shots are estimated at $147.8 billion, including $89.9 billion from related injuries, $52.2 billion from disabilities and $5.6 billion from excess deaths
A preprint systematic review found the mRNA-based COVID shots increased the risk of myocarditis, with a mortality of about 1 to 2 per 200 cases
Evidence of serious neurological harms, including Bell’s palsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenic disorder and stroke, which are likely due to an autoimmune reaction, was also found from the shots

We're beginning to see the fallout from the mass COVID-19 shot campaign, which has been referred to as the "greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity."1

Former BlackRock analyst and fund manager Edward Dowd is one of the few trying to get the word out about COVID-19 shot risks, and he's been using data and statistics to prove his point and publicize the undeniable increase in deaths and disability among young, healthy adults that has occurred since the shots' widespread rollout.2

This group — the 148 million employed Americans between the ages of 18 and 643 — is typically a healthy crowd. This is why private insurance companies love to sell group life insurance policies to large Fortune 500 corporations and mid-sized companies —they hardly ever have to pay out on a claim. But this is changing.

Dowd's 2022 U.S. Vaccine Damage Report4 revealed a sobering glimpse into the true carnage that occurred at the hands of the COVID-19 shot campaign, and its results are striking.

300K Excess Deaths, Millions of Injuries, Billions in Costs
Dowd and colleagues published their 2022 Vaccine Damage Project at their website, Phinance Technologies.5 It revealed the following estimated human and economic costs:6

Human Cost Economic Cost
26.6 million injuries
1.36 million disabilities
300,000 excess deaths
Total: $147.8 billion
Injuries: $89.9 billion
Disabilities: $52.2 billion
Excess deaths: $5.6 billion
To put this into perspective, John Leake writes on Courageous Discourse, "Note that this death count in one year is 5.2 times the number of men killed in 10 years of combat in Vietnam," adding:7

"Perhaps the most extraordinary thing about this state of affairs is that most Americans don't know it's happening. Every day, young people are dying from heart attacks, strokes, and seizures caused by COVID-19 vaccines. Most of their families and friends are led to believe that they just died — suddenly and unexpectedly — of acute conditions that were extremely rare in young people prior to 2021."

The report included data from employed individuals between the ages of 16 and 64, and categorized the impact into four broad groups:

No effect or asymptomatic
Mild to moderate outcome including a temporary or short-term, long-term or permanent injury
Severe outcome that leads to a disability
Extreme outcome leading to death
While group 1 was the largest, comprising an estimated 82% of the population, the authors pointed out that these groups are dynamic, and individuals in one group could move into another, particularly in the case of progressing from no or minor injury to severe injury, such as we've seen with elite athletes suddenly dropping dead on the field:8

"While these groupings characterize different levels of damage from the inoculations, they are not static and could interact with each other. For instance, there might be individuals who had no visible effects after vaccination but nonetheless could still be impacted from the inoculations and could therefore be represented in the sub-group of injured individuals.

In a similar way, individuals with mild injuries from the inoculations could, over time, develop severe injuries to the extent of being disabled, or an extreme outcome such as death. The likely path of outcomes would be from injury to disability to death.

We need to consider, however, that to a lesser extent there could be individuals who suffer extreme outcomes when they had previously only experienced mild injuries until then. We can relate this with the anecdotes of otherwise healthy athletes suffering heart attacks during sports competitions at an alarming rate since the 2021 inoculations."

'The Multiplier Effects Are Massive'
The effects in the report are only what can currently be measured, and are likely to also be fluid. In terms of economic effects, for instance, the report notes that mortuary companies are likely to benefit while life insurers will be harmed, leading to a reallocation of resources.

Meanwhile, in terms of economic costs, milder damage is associated with greater cost, since a larger portion of working age individuals are affected. For instance, those with mild to moderate injury made up a sizeable 18% of the population. According to the report:9

"We make the assumption that the pool of potentially vaccine-injured individuals is about 18% of the population, which is, the rate of related adverse events reported in the Pfizer clinical trial (minus the baseline rate). These injuries will likely manifest a loss of productivity since, as these individuals are likely to have higher absentee rates and, consequently, higher lost worktime rates, than the pre-2019 baseline.

In fact, we performed an analysis of absence rates and lost worktime rates10 in full time workers (using data provided by the BLS). We observed a large increase in absence rates starting in 2020, but accelerating in 2022. Absence rates in 2022 were about 28.6% higher than in 2019, representing a 11 standard deviation variation."

Further, many other economic costs are harder to account for, such as a worker who's still at work but not able to work to their full potential. When these types of scenarios are factored in, the damages could be even more massive. Dowd tweeted:11

"Our economic damage estimates are what we can measure. The knock effects such as lost productivity due to a worker being present but working at say 50%-75% of capacity is missed plus burn out from those picking up slack. Also supply chain delays are not captured etc and etc. The multiplier effects are massive."

Systematic Review Reveals Serious Harms
A preprint systematic review of papers with data on serious adverse events associated with COVID-19 shots again points to significant risks.12 The review was conducted by Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia and Professor Peter Gøtzsche, a Danish physician-researcher who co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration in 1993.

It included 18 systematic reviews, 14 randomized trials and 34 other studies, noting that "most studies were of poor quality" and additional randomized trials are needed. Still, their review revealed multiple red flags, including:13

Adenovirus vector vaccines increased the risk of venous thrombosis and thrombocytopenia
mRNA-based shots increased the risk of myocarditis, with a mortality of about 1 to 2 per 200 cases
Evidence of serious neurological harms, including Bell's palsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenic disorder and stroke, which are likely due to an autoimmune reaction, was found
Severe harms, defined as those that prevent daily activities, were underreported in the randomized trials
Severe harms were very common in studies of booster doses after a full round of shots and in a study of vaccination of previously infected people
Further, not only have drug regulators and public health authorities been slow to follow up on safety signals showing serious harms from the shots, Demasi notes, but, "Population-wide recommendations for COVID vaccination and boosters ignore the negative benefit to harm balance in low-risk groups such as children and people who have already recovered from covid-19 (natural immunity)."14

Australian Safety Report — 24-Fold Increase in Adverse Events
It's can be difficult to parse out adverse effects from COVID-19 shots and those due to COVID-19 infection. The Western Australia Vaccine Safety Surveillance (WAVSS) 2021 Report, however, shows a unique viewpoint that made this possible. At the time, there was virtually no COVID-19 circulating in the community, yet the area had a 90% vaccination rate among those 12 years and over.15 Umbrella News reported:16

"There are few regions in the world where most of the population was vaccinated before the spread of Covid in the community. Sealed off from the rest of Australia, and the world, for 697 days, WA's closed border earned it the moniker of the 'hermit kingdom'.

State Premier Mark McGowan noted WA's unique role in the global vaccination trial, remarking to a press conference in early 2022, You see, Western Australia is an experiment. We basically have had very few Omicron cases, we have very high vaccination levels, and we have a very compliant population."

So, what happened in an area of the world that had very few COVID-19 cases and very high rates of COVID-19 shots? An "exponential increase" in reports of adverse events following immunization (AEFI), such that it necessitated changes to the vaccine safety surveillance program at the department in order to manage them.17 According to the report:18

"The number of AEFI reported to WAVSS was significantly higher in 2021 than in previous years (10,726 compared with an average of 276 per year for the 2017-2020 period) due to the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccination program."

As Umbrella News reported, the peak of AEFI reports coincided with the rollout of shot mandates, culminating in a rush of hospitalizations that strained area hospitals:19

"In 2021, AEFIs for Covid vaccines were reported at almost 24x the rate of AEFIs for all other vaccines combined … In the latter half of the year, as AEFIs peaked, the media regularly reported that WA hospitals were under strain, despite the lack of Covid cases.

The highest month for AEFI reports was October, the same month that vaccine mandates were announced for most of the workforce, the vaccine eligibility criteria were expanded to people aged 18 and over, and walk-in vaccinations became available."

Other standouts from WA's report include a 35% increase in myocarditis and a 25% increase in pericarditis compared to background rates. "Shockingly," Umbrella News noted, "the risk of pericarditis in the age group in the age group 25 to 29 years old was 53.5 cases per 100,000 doses of Spikevax. It is perhaps unsurprising that chest pain was the fifth most common reported AEFI for COVID vaccines in 2021."20

COVID Shot Efficacy 'Grossly Overestimated'
While the risks of adverse effects have been downplayed, the efficacy of COVID-19 shots has been overstated from the beginning. Writing in the Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, a research team revealed that multiple biases, including background infection rates and cross-overs from unvaccinated to vaccinated in the early days of the campaign, led to an overstatement of COVID-19 shots' effectiveness.21

"We conclude that "real-world" studies using methodologies popular in early 2021 overstate vaccine effectiveness," the study notes.22 Board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough explained that from the lack of efficacy alone, the shots should be removed from the market. And the case gets even stronger when you factor in the significant number of related disabilities and deaths:23

"Multiple sources of bias created illusion that vaccines worked as they failed in the real world … claims that the COVID-19 vaccines worked to reduce spread of infection, hospitalization, and death must be rejected.

The burden of proof has not been met and threats to validity have not been overcome. All of the COVID-19 vaccines should be removed from the market and we should begin the investigative phase into how this massive program failed to stop COVID-19.

Think Globally, Act Locally
National vaccine policy recommendations in the U.S. are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being seriously threatened.

Not only are lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations and public health officials trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws, but global political operatives lobbying the United Nations and World Health Organization are determined to take away the human right to autonomy and protection of bodily integrity.

We must take action to defend our constitutional republic and civil liberties, including the right to autonomy, in America. That includes reforming oppressive mandatory vaccination laws and stopping the digital health ID that will make vaccine passports a reality for us, our children and grandchildren if we don’t take action today.

Signing up to use the free online Advocacy Portal sponsored by the National Vaccine Information Center at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own state and federal legislators on your smartphone or computer so you can make your voice heard.

NVIC will keep you up to date on the latest bills threatening to eliminate — or expand — your legal right to make vaccine choices and give you guidance about what you can do to support or oppose those bills. So, please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN:https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/

Share Your Story With Your Legislators and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up.

If you want to protect your legal right to say “no” to vaccines you do not believe are safe or effective, make an appointment to personally talk with someone you have elected to office at the local, state and federal level or write a letter in your own words stating your concerns.

Attend school board and city council and town hall meetings in your community that will impact your right to know and freedom to make decisions about how you or your children will live and stay healthy. If you have a different perspective on a story about vaccination that appears in your local newspaper, write a letter to the editor.

I must be frank with you: You have to be brave because there is a lot of censorship of conversations that challenge “official” narratives about vaccination. You likely will be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of the vaccine story and for defending your informed consent rights. Be prepared for it and have the courage to stand your ground.

Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

While our rights are being threatened, the vaccine injured are being swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than statistically acceptable “collateral damage" of one-size-fits-all mandatory vaccination laws. Way too many people are being put at risk for injury and death and there is nothing scientific or moral about that. We should not be treating human beings like guinea pigs.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the four websites of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at www.NVIC.org, a nonprofit charity that has been educating the public about the need to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths since 1982. The information you get on their websites is fully referenced and will help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your community:

NVIC.org — This website was established in 1995 and is the oldest and largest consumer operated website publishing information on diseases and vaccines on the internet. Learn about vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths and the history and current status of vaccine science, policy, law and ethics in the U.S. on more than 2,000 web pages.
NVICAdvocacy.org — This communications and advocacy network, established in 2010, is your gateway to taking action to protect your right to make vaccine choices where you live.
TheVaccineReaction.org — This weekly journal newspaper published by NVIC since 2015 is dedicated to encouraging an “enlightened conversation about vaccination, health and autonomy.”
MedAlerts.org — This is a user-friendly search engine for the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and sponsored by NVIC since 2006. Search for descriptions of vaccine injuries and deaths reported to VAERS on this popular website.

Find A Doctor Who Will Listen and Care
If your doctor or pediatrician refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, coercion and refusal to provide medical care to someone declining one or more doses of government recommended vaccines is a violation of the informed consent ethic.

Unfortunately, it is becoming routine among members of the medical establishment to be reluctant to share vaccine decision-making power with patients and parents of minor children, especially during the aggressive push for all Americans to get COVID shots.

There are doctors out there who respect the precautionary and informed consent principles, so take the time to locate a doctor who treats you with compassion and is willing to listen and respect the health care choices you make for yourself or your child."


+ Sources and References
1 Rumble February 27, 2023, 1:00
2 Bitchute, Tucker Carlson Interviews Ed Dowd February 25, 2023, 10:00
3, 7, 21, 23 Substack, Courageous Discourse March 29, 2023
4, 5, 8, 9 Phinance Technologies, The Vaccine Damage Project March 2023
6 Zero Hedge March 28, 2023
10 Phinance Technologies, US absence rates and lost worktime data March 2023
11 Twitter, Edward Dowd March 28, 2023
12 medRxiv March 22, 2023
13 medRxiv March 22, 2023, Results
14 Substack, Maryanne Demasi, reports March 28, 2023
15 Twitter, Dystopian Down Under March 28, 2023
16, 19, 20 Umbrella News March 28, 2023
17 Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance Report 2021, Page 29
18 Western Australian Vaccine Safety Surveillance Report 2021, Page 8
22 Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice March 26, 2023, Lessons Learned

[Gwin Ru]

...

... the end that signifies the beginning of some serious backlashes:

President Biden Ends COVID-19 National Emergency

Biden’s executive order ending the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’ will bring more attention to biowarfare crimes and criminal human experimentation conducted on US and global citizens with mRNA technology.

Karen Kingston

Apr 11, 2023
∙ Paid

April 10, 2023: Before I get to the breaking news that President Biden signed an executive order ending the COVID-19 Pandemic National Emergency, I want my readers to know that I received a message earlier today notifying me that some of the prominent ‘anti-vaxx’ medical and scientific experts were willing to state that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are, in fact, bioweapons. I hope this is true.

Why is this important? Because once half of the American population is no longer being gaslit into believing mRNA bioweapons are ‘vaccines’ or ‘gene-therapies’ they will be able to understand and articulate the crimes of biowarfare that have been committed against them and their children. When people are aware that the mRNA injections are bioweapons that are a grave threat to their children, friends and family, they will remove the threat of the mRNA technology injections from their communities by themselves, if they have to.

This brings us to Biden’s Executive Order, “which terminates the national emergency related to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

[...]

[Frankie Pancakes]

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2...e/#more-299646

24-year-old giant panda Le Le dies at Memphis Zoo
February 24, 2023

Giant panda Le Le at the Memphis Zoo picked the Kansas City Chiefs to win the Super Bowl over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on February 5, 2021.

Omaha, NE (KPTM) — The Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium announced that a popular rhino who lived in the zoo's Asian Highlands exhibit, passed away early this week. The death of Jontu was attributed to a gastrointestinal illness.

Below is the news release from the zoo:

Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo and Aquarium sadly announces the death of Jontu, a male, Greater one-horned rhino, on Tuesday, March 28, 2023, from complications related to a gastrointestinal illness. He was 15 years old.

https://fox42kptm.com/news/local/beloved-zoo-rhino-dies

Jontu was “vaccinated”:

Willow, a 6-year-old giraffe at the Maryland Zoo in Baltimore, died after “suddenly deteriorating” Monday, zoo officials said. The team caring for Willow ultimately decided to euthanize her.

Willow, a reticulated giraffe, was born in 2017. Described as an “awkward calf with ossicles that looked like pigtails” when she was young, Willow grew into a tall, beautiful icon for both the zoo and her vulnerable species.

https://www.thebaltimorebanner.com/c...PJUWDN6KRIYTY/

https://www.wbtv.com/2023/03/29/trem...r-old-giraffe/

WILLOW WAS “VACCINATED”

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/...814200320?s=20

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/nbreavington/sta...65740361678872

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/13/b...accine-deaths/

BBC News caught spreading Disinformation which accidentally confirms COVID Vaccination is in fact to blame for Excess Deaths in 2022 being the highest in 50 years

Official UK Government data has revealed a startling truth that has left the people in a state of disbelief.

England and Wales suffered the highest number of excess deaths in over half a century in 2022, and a non-stop weekly rally of excess deaths since week 16 of 2022 that equates to 62,543 excess deaths as of March 2023.

And thanks to the BBC lying to the public, we know that the main cause of this huge increase in deaths is COVID-19 vaccination.



What’s more shocking is that mainstream media reporters had made the decision to conceal the truth from the public, driven by their ambition and a belief that they will not be held accountable for their actions.

They thought the British public would be too lazy to “mark their homework,” so to speak.

But they didn’t count on an independent news organisation, committed to reporting the facts that the mainstream media refuse to, fact-checking their quietly published article.

The BBC, the widely but most definitely unjustly trusted news source/propaganda arm of the UK government, and its reporters have knowingly lied about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccine and lied to the public.

They unequivocally stated that the Covid-19 vaccine was not responsible for a record-breaking year of death, providing a “source” to prove it. They claimed that figures up to June 2022, looking at deaths from all causes, showed unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people.

‘Figures up to June 2022 looking at deaths from all causes show unvaccinated people were more likely to die than vaccinated people.’

Source- BBC Newsnone
They then went on to state that –

”If vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around.”

Source- BBC Newsnone
The problem for the BBC, is that ‘The Expose’ has been analyzing the source provided by a UK government institution known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS) for months on end.

And we can reveal that mortality rates per 100,000 in every single age group, even children, in England and Wales were lowest among the unvaccinated in some age groups as early as 2021, and lowest among the unvaccinated in all age groups by May 2022 at the latest.

The overdue updated report, finally published towards the end of February 2023, also confirms the unvaccinated had the lowest mortality rate per 100,000 throughout the whole of 2022.

Therefore, BBC News has not only lied to the public, but has also admitted in black and white that the Covid-19 injections are to blame for 2022 being the worst year for deaths in half a century by confirming that

“If vaccines were driving excess deaths we would expect this to be the other way around (highest mortality rates among the vaccinated).”

Source- BBC Newsnone

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/sta...614586880?s=20

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/sta...936413184?s=20

[Gwin Ru]

...

... explains the rash of "Turbo Cancers":

Former Pfizer Employee Karen Kingston on Covid mRNA Vaccine Patent Ingredients That Will Bring Spike of Deadly Cancer

Original video.

Karen Kingston has been doing this great work for years. Note that this article is from 10/20/21 (over a year ago). She is a former employee of Pfizer, with detail insights into how these products are produced, tested (or not), and marketed. A lot of her research is based upon the patents that she has found, but is then verified in the products. Her normal medical, legal, review process has uncovered these issues.




By Brannon Howse,
20 October, 2021

This is an interview with Brannon Howse from October 20, 2021. If you go to the 12:00 minute mark, I explain how the enemies of America are destroying America by convincing citizens and military to concede to participate in self-harm and suicide by injecting themselves with bioweapons.

American Citizens and Military are Conceding to Self-Harm due to Fear-Based Propaganda and Coercion

October 20, 2021: The enemies of America are destroying America by convincing citizens and military to concede to participate in self-harm and suicide by injecting themselves with bioweapons.

“Whether it’s China or some global terrorist group, there was no defeating the United States. We have the most powerful economy, we have the most powerful military. So the only way to take out democracy would be for the American people to concede in an effort to commit self-harm and/or suicide against their own population. They would need our own military to do this. That’s the only way America could ever be taken out, and that’s what’s being done.”

This interview is more than a year old. I hope experts and leaders join me in sharing the evidence that the mRNA injections are bioweapons and no longer fear social rejection or criticism for accurately identifying them as such. Please help share the truth by sharing the Kingston Report.

The below is the transcript I copy and pasted from WVTV regarding this interview.


Former Pfizer employee and research patent expert Karen Kingston returned for another blockbuster interview with Brannon Howse in which she shed more light on some of the key ingredients used in the Covid vaccines and their potential impact on human health.

Some of the ingredients are known toxins that could cause a dramatic increase in deadly cancers, Kingston explained in the nearly one-hour interview on Oct. 20.

One questionable ingredient is a product known generically as Luciferase, which is a bioluminescent enzyme catalyst that gives the vials of liquid vaccine a blueish glow under certain light.

“It’s in the patent so we know it’s in the product,” Kingston said.

Luciferase serves two purposes, she said.

“It’s a chemical agent used for scientific testing, so what it does is it will map out and test to see what genetic changes have occurred within the biology of a specimen, which in this case is a human being.

“It’s also a catalyst for amplification and replication of genetic material and it improves the integration of that material into cells.

“So it both provides information and testing as well as replication of genetic material and integration of that genetic material into cells. It aides in these processes.”

But that’s not the most shocking revelation about the vaccines. That honor is reserved for the HeLa immortal cell line used in scientific research and included in the vaccines. It is the oldest and most commonly used human cell line, named after a 31-year-old mother of five who died on Oct. 4, 1951, of cervical cancer. The cell line was taken from her cancer cells on Feb. 8, 1951. Her name was Henrietta Lacks.

HeLa cells have been reported to contain human papilloma virus 18 (HPV-18) sequences.

Gen. Colin Powell was suffering from cancer and died last week of Covid-related symptoms despite being fully vaccinated.

“What’s in the vaccines has been proven to accelerate the formation of cancer cells and if you have cancer it’s going to accelerate the cancer growth in your body in a couple of different ways,” Kingston said.

“One is the patent contains the HeLa stem cell line, an immortal stem cell line from a woman from the 1950s who died from cervical cancer. Unlike the normal stem cells, this is from the most aggressive cancer.

“It accelerates cancerous cell growth. It’s very deadly.”

The code or genetic sequencing from that cell line is now in the vaccine. This is not disputable or up for debate.

The Kingston Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

“It’s in the patent. It explains why people are getting these rare forms of cancer,” Kingston said. “This woman was 31 years old when she died and left five children behind.”

Dr. Judy Mikovitz also believes many of these vaccines are causing cancers in people, Howse pointed out. She reported in a previous interview with Howse that her daughter-in-law died of a rare bone cancer after being fully vaccinated.

“This is how dirty these vaccines are,” Howse said.

“Yes, there will be a massive outbreak of cancers and very advanced forms showing up out of nowhere, basically,” Kingston reiterated.

But the full list of ingredients remains unknown, she said.

“We don’t know. The consumer goods manufacturing practices were all skipped. It’s Russian roulette. We know there are micro-organisms in some of the vaccines. But they’re not in all of them.”

She cited a German doctor’s research that found one out of every five vials contained a micro-organism.

“So what vials contain the HeLa stem cell line? We don’t know.”

Kingston said the mass vaccination programs need to be stopped now and those who have participated in their government approval, manufacture and promotion need to be held accountable.

“There needs to be a mass stop to all of this right now in our country and across the globe. Everything that’s been done. It has not been just unlawful. It’s criminal. The FDA’s [emergency] authorization has been criminal, the FDA approval has been criminal, the manufacturing has been criminal, the propaganda promoting it as ‘safe and effective’ has been criminal.

“This is a massive global terrorist attack against humanity. It’s all criminal. It needs to stop. We’ve been lied to and people are dying. As people like myself and doctors come forward, it’s clear this is an act of genocide against the global population.”

Kingston said the entire global campaign surrounding COVID-19 and the mandating of Covid “vaccines” was part of an international criminal conspiracy to take down the United States as a global superpower and upholder of democracy.

“Whether it’s China or some other global terrorist group, there was no defeating the United States. We have the most powerful economy, we have the most powerful military. So the only way to take out democracy would be for the American people to concede in an effort to commit self-harm and/or suicide against their own population. And they would need their own military to do this. That’s the only way America could ever be taken out, and that’s what we’ve done.”

Kingston said she does not understand why neither the federal nor any state governments have filed criminal charges against the FDA, the CDC, the NIH and Dr. Anthony Fauci.

“What the FDA has done is not unlawful, it is criminal. What Fauci has done is criminal,” she said.

“And yet the FBI is going after moms voicing concerns at school board meetings,” Howse said.

“That’s part of it,” Kingston responded.

That’s part of the deception and diversionary tactics of a mass psychological warfare campaign.

Kingston said the government defines terrorism as any tactic waged against the civilian population that violates state or federal law and results in harm to American citizens.

“That’s what’s going on,” she said.

“If you look at the VAERS data [on the CDC website] those are not adverse events because that would be unintended consequences. The FDA met on Oct. 22, 2020, and they listed out myocarditis, encephalitis, elimination of your platelets [as possible side effects].

“They knew what they were doing. We have all the evidence to show the FDC, the NIH, and the CDC, they all knew what was going to happen. They executed their plan. They used behavioral insights in partnership with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], including Harvard Business at the helm of it, to know how to psychologically, mentally and emotionally manipulate Americans to do something that had no benefit to them, and then to cover it up.”

The OECD, comprised of 38 member nations, is involved with the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations and other elitist, globalist NGOs in using the Covid scare to push for a new international economic and political system based on so-called “green” practices and “sustainable development.”

Kingston did not speculate on why these practices were being pushed, but the reasons are hiding in plain sight in the documents published by the above organizations.

The OECD, for example, states on its website that:

“The COVID-19 pandemic is transforming how we think about our economies and our societies. The policy choices governments make today will determine their success in building a transition to a greener, more inclusive and more resilient tomorrow.”

Klaus Schwab, founder and director of the World Economic Forum, has made countless statements echoing the same exploitive view about Covid, which he says presents “a narrow window of opportunity” for elites to “transform society.”

These elites all use words like “greener,” more “inclusive” and “resilient” as code for a more controlled society in which everything and everyone is connected to the internet, monitored, surveilled and assessed 24/7. Those found to be less obedient to the dictates of big government and big corporations/big tech, are assigned a low social credit score and forbidden from participating in basic life functions like travel, working a job, banking or even entering stores and other public facilities.

The Washington Post, the Associated Press, CBC-Canada, the BBC and other major news outlets participated in the global Covid conspiracy by partnering with Facebook and other social media giants in what they dubbed, in typical Orwellian fashion, the Trusted News Initiative.

Under this initiative big corporate media agreed in December 2020 to stamp out any reporting on Covid vaccines that challenged the prevailing government narrative by branding it as “misinformation” or “disinformation.”

“This is all criminal,” Kingston said. “I don’t understand why people aren’t filing criminal charges.”

HeLa cell lines are listed in the patent on the Moderna website for all of the mRNA vaccines.

“This and the Luciferase may explain why someone like Gen. Colin Powell, already sick with cancer, may have exacerbated his condition. Is that true?” Howse asked.

“Yes. And Dr. Mikovits has had to mourn the loss of her daughter-in-law who is in her forties, from a rare form of bone cancer that normally hits people in their eighties,” Kingston said.

“They could be delivering anything to people.

“This is a lethal injection.”

Those doctors and scientists who truly “follow the science” have been attacked. This includes Drs. Peter McCullough, Brian Ardis, Sheri Tenpenny, Lee Merritt, Sucharit Bahkti and others.

“There’s nothing I’m presenting that isn’t in standard government documents. That’s what I do for a living,” Kingston said.

“The other stuff you’re listening to in the mainstream media is propaganda.”

[Ewan]

KILLING JONAH; Family says Covid 19 vaccine killed their 14 year old son.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=leAfFXGLOzc

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/iluminatibot/sta...831726592?s=20

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/_aussie17/status...148320769?s=20

[onawah]

Media Covers Up Tracking of Unvaccinated People
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
April 18, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...bid=1775911293

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In mid-February 2023, I reported that the U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program:
https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/f...g-unvaccinated
Within days, fact checkers tried to debunk the idea that individual people are being tracked, or that these data could be misused by government or third parties
COVID “vaccination” status was not considered a private medical matter at all during 2021 and 2022, yet mainstream media now want you to believe that your COVID jab status is protected by medical privacy laws
Your medical data are not nearly as private as you think.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is rife with exemptions when it comes to your privacy.
Federal agencies such as Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, are exempt from the privacy clauses and can access identifiable data — especially if there’s an outbreak of infectious disease, be it real or fictitious
Government agencies and a number of third parties or “covered entities” can also use a number of loopholes to re-identify previously de-identified patient data
In mid-February 2023, I reported that the U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn't get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1

Within days, fact checkers were burning the midnight oil trying to debunk the idea that individual people are being tracked, or that these data could be misused by government or third parties.

Strangely enough, the most egregious "misinformation" example USA Today's fact checker could find was a social media post that "generated nearly 200 likes in less than a month."2 Two hundred likes? To most influencers, that's nothing, especially not over the course of 30 days.

Why is USA Today stressing over a post with 200 likes? Seems a bit panicky if you ask me. Reuters also came out with a fact check and, like USA Today, Reuters claimed there was a lack of "context:"3

"New diagnostic codes that describe a patient as under-immunized against COVID-19 were introduced to help doctors identify patients potentially at risk for more-severe COVID and to help health officials track vaccine effectiveness and mortality statistics, among other public health questions, not for U.S. government tracking of unvaccinated individuals, as some are claiming online.

The codes in an individual's medical record, like all personal health information, are protected by U.S. privacy law and could only be analyzed at the group or population level uncoupled from individual identities …"

Your Medical Records Are Far From Private
As is so often the case, the fact checkers are the ones taking the issue out of context or, rather, not presenting the full picture. The fact is, your medical data are not nearly as private as you think. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) is rife with exemptions when it comes to your privacy.

Federal agencies such as Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have every right to access identifiable information, as they are exempt from the privacy clauses, and they're particularly justified to access your private vaccination data if there's an outbreak of infectious disease, be it real or fictitious. As noted in the HHS's and CDC's HIPAA guidance:4

"Balancing the protection of individual health information with the need to protect public health, the Privacy Rule expressly permits disclosures without individual authorization to public health authorities authorized by law to collect or receive the information for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability, including but not limited to public health surveillance, investigation, and intervention …

[T]he Privacy Rule expressly permits PHI [protected health information] to be shared for specified public health purposes. For example, covered entities may disclose PHI, without individual authorization, to a public health authority legally authorized to collect or receive the information for the purpose of preventing or controlling disease, injury, or disability …

Further, the Privacy Rule permits covered entities to make disclosures that are required by other laws, including laws that require disclosures for public health purposes."

Loopholes Also Allow Re-Identification of Personal Data
Government agencies and a number of third parties or "covered entities" can also use a number of loopholes to re-identify previously de-identified patient data. As explained in a CDC Public Health Law document detailing the lawful sharing of private medical data:5

"While HIPAA limits the use and disclosure of health information, it also permits certain secondary use exceptions for public health purposes. HIPAA provides certain circumstances under which patient data can be disclosed to health departments without patient authorization.

Under HIPAA, providers may disclose identifiable patient data (protected health information or PHI) if required by law, allowing states to pass legal exceptions to HIPAA restrictions.

Providers may also disclose PHI to health departments without patient authorization for public health activities, such as communicable disease reporting, or to a public health authority to prevent or control disease, injury, or disability under the public health exemption. A covered entity may access, use, and disclose PHI for clinical research without an individual's authorization if:

1)it obtains documentation of waiver of individual's authorization by an institutional review board or privacy board

2)the PHI is necessary for this research

3)the research is using PHI of decedents

Providers may disclose EHI without patient authorization when the data have been 'de-identified' … but still permits re-identification by providers or regional health information organizations through randomized patient source codes should a public health alert or case report become necessary.

Finally, providers may disclose a 'limited data set,' including dates and zip codes, without authorization and still re-identify patients if they maintain patient codes derived from certain identifiers."

So, can your vaccination status be accessed by federal health agencies? Yes. Can that information be identifiable? Absolutely yes. Does that mean that you, as an individual, could be surveilled and/or get caught in a forced vaccination dragnet or end up experiencing negative repercussions in other areas of your life due to your vaccination status? Probably.

U.S. "privacy" laws certainly make allowances for such scenarios, and considering the behavior of government over the past three years, it would be naïve to believe they would never use your vaccination data against you.

Reuters Muddies the Water
Reuters also muddies the water in other ways. For example, the fact check stresses that medical providers have used the general code Z28.3 (which represents "underimmunized") since 2015, and that "these codes are not used with purposes beyond monitoring and reporting diseases and mortality statistics or for insurance billing."

While it's true that the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code Z28.3 has been around for years, the new subcodes that track COVID jab status were added in mid-September 2021 during a ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting, and during that meeting, they specified that "there is interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized."

Below is a screenshot of page 194 of the agenda6 distributed during that meeting. There's no ambiguity here. The new ICD-10 codes were added for the specific purpose of "tracking people" who are unjabbed or only partially jabbed against COVID-19.

They didn't say they wanted to track "general population data." They specifically said "people" are to be tracked. They also clearly state that this tracking is "of value for public health" — and again, the key words "public health" open the door to federal health agencies accessing identifiable data.



Moreover, additional subcodes specify the "why" a person chose not to get the COVID shot or stopped getting boosters. Those codes are listed in the screenshot below, under Z28.3 Underimmunization Status.7



The use of "delinquent immunization status" under code Z28.39 also tells us something about where this is all headed. "Delinquent" means being "neglectful of a duty" or being "guilty of an offense." Is refusing boosters a criminal offense? Perhaps not today, but some day, it might be, and these codes lay the foundation for that kind of medical persecution.

All Missed Vaccinations Will Be Tracked
Another tipoff that these codes will become part and parcel of the biosecurity control grid, even if they're not used in this way now, is the fact that code Z28.39 — "Other underimmunization status"8 — is to be used "when a patient is not current on other, non-COVID vaccines."9

In other words, they have already begun tracking ALL of your vaccinations, not just the COVID shot, and they can use the Z28.3 sub-codes to identify why you refused a given vaccine.

They've also added a billable ICD-10 code for "immunization safety counseling," which explains the codes detailing "why" you refused a vaccine. So, if you didn't get a vaccine due to "personal decision" (code Z28.2), or due to "personal beliefs or group pressure" (code Z28.1), then your doctor can bill your insurance for regurgitating vaccine propaganda and trying to change your mind.

Codes Could Be Put to Good Use
Giving credit where credit is due, Reuters Fact Check did point out a potentially beneficial purpose for the new ICD-10 codes:10

"[Eric Burnett, who specializes in hospital and internal medicine at Columbia University] said the ICD-10 codes could also help track data on vaccine efficacy, including comparisons between vaccination statuses of hospital or ICU patients with COVID, or patient mortality data based on vaccination status."

That would be great, but the risk of these data being misused by the government is, I believe, greater than the possibility of them being used to protect the public from dangerous mRNA shots, seeing how overwhelming amounts of data showing harms are already being willfully ignored.

CDC Refuses to Answer Questions About the New Codes
Another red flag is the fact that the CDC has refused to answer questions about how it intends to use the new ICD-10 codes. In mid-February 2023, nine House Republicans sent a letter to the CDC demanding answers to these five questions:11

Why did the CDC and National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) decide to start gathering data on why Americans chose not to take the COVID-19 vaccine?
How do the CDC and NCHS intend to use these new COVID-19 vaccination ICD codes?
What steps are the CDC and NCHS taking to ensure that Americans' private health information contained in the ICD system is protected?
Will the CDC and NCHS confirm that they have not, will not, and cannot create a database of Americans based on their COVID-19 vaccination status?
Can the CDC and NCHS confirm that private companies do not have access to lists of Americans' COVID-19 vaccination status through the ICD system, or any other database overseen by the CDC and NCHS
As reported by The Daily Signal February 28, 2023, the CDC for some reason does not want to answer these questions:12

"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention told The Daily Signal that it 'will not be tracking' the reasons Americans give for refusing to take a COVID-19 vaccine … Meanwhile, congressional Republicans told The Daily Signal that the CDC failed to respond to their questions by a deadline last week.

'Two weeks ago, we sent a letter to the CDC demanding answers about its new COVID-19 vaccine database,' Rep. Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., told The Daily Signal in a statement …

'The CDC is stonewalling us and refusing to respond. Why won't the CDC explain why it's gathering data about Americans' personal choices? House Republicans are not afraid to use the budgetary process to keep the CDC accountable to the American people,' Brecheen warned.

House Republicans raised the alarm about the CDC's involvement with the World Health Organization's recently codified International Classification of Disease, or ICD, codes related to COVID-19 vaccination status, which went into effect last April. The codes enable the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to collect data on the reasons Americans refuse to take one of the vaccines …

'The ICD codes were implemented in April 2022, however the CDC/NCHS does not have any data on the codes and will not be tracking this information,' Nick Spinelli, a CDC spokesman, said in an emailed statement. 'The codes are developed and managed by the World Health Organization to enable healthcare providers to track within their practices …'"

End Goal Is Global Database for the Vaccine Passport System
The mention of the WHO brings me to my next point, which is that all of this information will likely, eventually, be transferred into a global vaccination database. Hence the reason why the WHO develops and manages the ICD-10 codes. It's to allow for the "harmonization" of health care across the world.

Incidentally, the fact that the WHO develops and manages these codes also means that the WHO has approved these new codes that track vaccination status, and we already know that the WHO is working on a global vaccine passport.

COVID 'vaccination' status was not considered a private medical matter at all during 2021 and 2022, yet mainstream media now want you to believe that your COVID jab status is protected by medical privacy laws.
To work properly, a global vaccine passport system needs a global vaccination database, and there's no telling what privacy measures, if any, such a database might end up with.
What we do know is that white papers13 and proposed legislation14 published during the COVID era that discuss health tracking and/or vaccine passports have stressed that privacy concerns must be relaxed or dropped altogether to ensure global biosecurity.

We also saw how COVID "vaccination" status was not considered a private medical matter at all during 2021 and 2022. In many places, you had to disclose your status and show proof that you'd been jabbed. Yet mainstream media now want you to believe that your COVID jab status is protected by medical privacy laws. What a joke.

As noted by Dr. Robert Malone in a January 25, 2023, Substack article, this vaccine passport system is being put into place right under our noses, and it would be incredibly naïve to think that these new ICD-10 codes are not part of that scheme:15

"The administrative state is busy building a vaccine passport system that will be active before most Americans are aware of what is being done to them. No one is going to knock on your door asking for your vaccine status because they already know …

They don't need approval from Congress or the courts because we have given them the information through our health care providers. The CDC is the governmental organization tasked with tracking vaccine status on individuals.

They already have the records, as well as updated booster information. They just need to tweak a definition here and there, or get President Biden to keep the COVID-19 public health emergency in place indefinitely and the vaccine passports will be a fait accompli."

A Data Collection Dragnet
As of January 1, 2014, the U.S. government required public and private health care providers to adopt and use electronic medical records (EMR) if they wanted to quality for full Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement.

The government also financially incentivized physicians and hospitals to adopt electronic HEALTH records or EHR.16 The difference between EMR and EHR is that EHR provides a far more comprehensive patient history than EMR, as it contains a patient's medical history from more than one medical practice.

In essence, EHR is what you get when doctors share your medical data to create one comprehensive file that covers all your interactions with the medical system. While that sounds good in theory, Big Pharma immediately seized the opportunity to misuse it by placing drug ads within the EHR system.

This in turn has driven up medical costs and resulted in poor prescribing decisions that put patients at risk.17 Patients are also directly targeted with drug marketing through patient portals.

Physicians and hospitals who adopted EHR got paid extra. Between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) paid out EHR incentive payments to hospitals totaling $14.6 billion.18 Meanwhile, those who chose not to capture, share and report clinical data on patients were financially penalized through reduced Medicare reimbursements.19,20

Needless to say, these "sticks" and "carrots" led to the rapid adoption of both EMR and EHR, both of which government requires if it wants the power to control the population through medicine, and we now know that's exactly what government intends to do.

Transhumanism Is Being Implemented Through Food and Medicine
At the end of September 2022, President Biden laid out a "bold goal" to "end hunger and increase healthy eating and physical activity by 2030" through a federally-backed "Food Is Medicine" campaign.21 https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/r...ot-for-control

Integrating food and nutrition with health care so that food and health policies are under one umbrella will facilitate the creation of new policies, funding and control over both areas. Eventually, food purchases and health records will be linked to your vaccine passport/digital identity, which also holds your educational records, travel records, work records and bank accounts.

That this "Food Is Medicine" campaign has nothing to do with promoting real nutrition or whole food is obvious, as that same month Biden also signed the "Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy."22

This specifies that biotechnology and genetic engineering be used to transform the food and medical industries in order to promote a transhumanist agenda. It's all about creating fake, synthetic and genetically manipulated foods and tinkering with the human genome.
https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/e...-created-foods

On a larger scale, this plan is also promoted by the World Health Organization, which is trying to seize power over health care globally through International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments and the Pandemic Treaty. For more information on that, see "Pandemic Treaty Will Usher In Unelected One World Government." https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/p...rld-government

The WHO is also seeking to put food, medicine and climate under one umbrella. This would allow it to control the global population in any number of ways, as a climate issue could be positioned as a public health issue, or a food issue, and vice versa. In other words, people could be forced to eat bugs instead of beef because it "benefits the climate." Private vehicle use could be restricted because it helps lower vehicular pollution that endangers public health, and so on.

So, to bring us full circle back to where we started, while media are now trying to lull you to sleep with "promises" that there's nothing nefarious about tracking the unvaccinated or "undervaccinated," think long and hard before you close your eyes to the possibility that this is all part of biosecurity-based totalitarian control grid.

Think Globally, Act Locally
National vaccine policy recommendations in the U.S. are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being seriously threatened.

Not only are lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations and public health officials trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws, but global political operatives lobbying the United Nations and World Health Organization are determined to take away the human right to autonomy and protection of bodily integrity.

We must take action to defend our constitutional republic and civil liberties, including the right to autonomy, in America. That includes reforming oppressive mandatory vaccination laws and stopping the digital health ID that will make vaccine passports a reality for us, our children and grandchildren if we don’t take action today.

Signing up to use the free online Advocacy Portal sponsored by the National Vaccine Information Center at : https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/ gives you immediate, easy access to your own state and federal legislators on your smartphone or computer so you can make your voice heard.

NVIC will keep you up to date on the latest bills threatening to eliminate — or expand — your legal right to make vaccine choices and give you guidance about what you can do to support or oppose those bills. So, please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

Share Your Story With Your Legislators and People You Know
If you or a family member has suffered a serious vaccine reaction, injury or death, please talk about it. If we don't share information and experiences with one another, everybody feels alone and afraid to speak up.

If you want to protect your legal right to say “no” to vaccines you do not believe are safe or effective, make an appointment to personally talk with someone you have elected to office at the local, state and federal level or write a letter in your own words stating your concerns.

Attend school board and city council and town hall meetings in your community that will impact your right to know and freedom to make decisions about how you or your children will live and stay healthy. If you have a different perspective on a story about vaccination that appears in your local newspaper, write a letter to the editor.

I must be frank with you: You have to be brave because there is a lot of censorship of conversations that challenge “official” narratives about vaccination. You likely will be strongly criticized for daring to talk about the "other side" of the vaccine story and for defending your informed consent rights. Be prepared for it and have the courage to stand your ground.

Only by sharing our perspective and what we know to be true will the public conversation about vaccination open up so people are not afraid to talk about it.

While our rights are being threatened, the vaccine injured are being swept under the carpet and treated like nothing more than statistically acceptable “collateral damage" of one-size-fits-all mandatory vaccination laws. Way too many people are being put at risk for injury and death and there is nothing scientific or moral about that. We should not be treating human beings like guinea pigs.

Internet Resources Where You Can Learn More
I encourage you to visit the four websites of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), at www.NVIC.org, a nonprofit charity that has been educating the public about the need to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths since 1982. The information you get on their websites is fully referenced and will help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your community:

NVIC.org https://www.nvic.org/ — This website was established in 1995 and is the oldest and largest consumer operated website publishing information on diseases and vaccines on the internet. Learn about vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths and the history and current status of vaccine science, policy, law and ethics in the U.S. on more than 2,000 web pages.
NVICAdvocacy.org https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/ — This communications and advocacy network, established in 2010, is your gateway to taking action to protect your right to make vaccine choices where you live.
TheVaccineReaction.org — https://thevaccinereaction.org/ This weekly journal newspaper published by NVIC since 2015 is dedicated to encouraging an “enlightened conversation about vaccination, health and autonomy.”
MedAlerts.org — https://www.medalerts.org/index.php This is a user-friendly search engine for the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and sponsored by NVIC since 2006. Search for descriptions of vaccine injuries and deaths reported to VAERS on this popular website.https://www.medalerts.org/index.php

Find a Doctor Who Will Listen and Care
If your doctor or pediatrician refuses to provide medical care to you or your child unless you agree to get vaccines you don't want, I strongly encourage you to have the courage to find another doctor. Harassment, coercion and refusal to provide medical care to someone declining one or more doses of government recommended vaccines is a violation of the informed consent ethic.

Unfortunately, it is becoming routine among members of the medical establishment to be reluctant to share vaccine decision-making power with patients and parents of minor children, especially during the aggressive push for all Americans to get COVID shots.

There are doctors out there who respect the precautionary and informed consent principles, so take the time to locate a doctor who treats you with compassion and is willing to listen and respect the health care choices you make for yourself or your child."

Sources and References
1 PJ Media April 8, 2023
2 USA Today March 10, 2023
3, 10 Reuters February 21, 2023
4 CDC HIPAA Privacy Rule and Public Health
5 CDC Public Health Law
6 CDC ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee Meeting September 14-15, 2021
7 Naked Emperor Substack January 27, 2023
8 ICD10data Underimmunization
9 AAFP New Diagnosis Codes
11, 12 The Daily Signal February 28, 2023
13 The Rockefeller Foundation, National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities, April 21, 2020 (PDF)
14 Congress.gov HR 6666
15 RW Malone Substack January 25, 2023
16, 20 USF Health February 16, 2017, Updated March 4, 2023
17 AMA June 16, 2021
18 OIG HHS EHR Incentive Payments to Hospitals
19 AMA EHR Incentive Programs
21 Health.gov Conference on Hunger, Nutrition and Health
22 Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/CKellyUAP/status...550802433?s=20

https://twitter.com/CKellyUAP/status...391034880?s=20

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/stat...830737924?s=20

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/...520442880?s=20

[Vangelo]

This twitter post appears to have been deleted. I wonder what is up.

Here is a link to the study but I can't find results/conclusions:

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://twitter.com/CKellyUAP/status...550802433?s=20

https://twitter.com/CKellyUAP/status...391034880?s=20

[Matthew]

We've likely all heard of this case and seen this report, but what is interesting here is the shenanigans of classed as unvaccinated if died within 14 days of vaccination is blown out the water in this high-profile case.

Doctor died from rare reaction to AstraZeneca Covid jab, UK coroner rules
Dr Stephen Wright’s widow considering legal action against AstraZeneca and government
...

Speaking at a Business Questions session, Ms Mordaunt,the Commons Leader also accused Mr Bridgen of promoting "false propaganda" which originated from the Kremlin and "abusing and undermining colleagues." The comments came after he raised the case of Dr Stephen Wright, a NHS clinical psychologist, who had died from “unintended consequences of vaccination”- according to a recent inquest.

Mr Bridgen said: "In light of yesterday’s Coroner’s Court ruling that the death of Dr Stephen Wright was due to unintended complications of the vaccine, we now have a legal precedent to review all cases of deaths which fell within the first 14 days of receiving these experimental treatments.

"As previously, any death within a fortnight of receiving a vaccine was regarded as an unvaccinated death. His death was originally attributed to natural causes. Will Government issue a statement and also release details of all the other such cases of situations where people sadly died within 14 days of vaccination?”

...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-coroner-rules

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/...422277634?s=20

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/...432253441?s=20

[Sue (Ayt)]

Posted by Vangelo (here)
This twitter post appears to have been deleted. I wonder what is up.

Here is a link to the study but I can't find results/conclusions:

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://twitter.com/CKellyUAP/status...550802433?s=20

https://twitter.com/CKellyUAP/status...391034880?s=20

I found the announcement of the results on a press release by MedinCell (who conducted the study) that was published on 1/5/2023
https://www.medincell.com/en/2023/01...ed-population/