Vaccine Crimes

[Icare]

66 year-oldpilot crashed his small plane just hours after receiving his second Moderna jab


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6jpOnyW7iOPR

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/PierreKory/statu...897736707?s=20

https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.c...gainst-science



Peter Hotez's War Against Science
Approaches for dealing with those who promote falsehoods and seek to silence the truth

< ling article at link >



https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/statu...824562690?s=20

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...creation-wuhan

Vax-Pushing Debate Dodger Linked To 'Chimeric' Coronavirus Creation In Wuhan

< at link >

Hotez’s own 2012 to 2017 NIH grant for the development of a SARS vaccine had the stated aim of responding to any “accidental release from a laboratory,” in addition to a possible zoonotic spillover of the virus.

As part of his NIH grant, Hotez subcontracted funding for research on combined or “chimeric” coronaviruses, a scientific paper shows. Hotez’s grant underwrote two of Shi’s collaborators on the project. [Shi headed the Wuhan lab's coronavirus modification project].

[onawah]

Self Assembly Nanomaterials Used For Battery And Electronic Devices Found In Human Blood - Filament Construction Process Documented - Unvaccinated Are Becoming Cyborgs Too
Dr. Ana’s Newsletter
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
JUN 21, 2023
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email

(THIS ARTICLE will be easier to read at the link above, but I just wanted to copy it here to make sure that it can be clearly seen how detailed and thorough Dr. Ana's research is here, as in her other articles, and what clear conclusions can be drawn from it. )





"Image: a-d) Schematic of the formation mechanism of Fe 2 O 3-C nanofibers with bubble-nanorod-structure. e,f) TEM images of Fe 2 O 3-C nanofibers. Figures a-f reproduced with permission. [52] Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society. g) TEM image of carbon-based materials with bubble-nano rod structure, reproduced with permission. [78] Copyright 2012, Royal Society of Chemistry.

Porous One-Dimensional Nanomaterials: Design, Fabrication and Applications in Electrochemical Energy Storage

In this article I wish to draw attention to the literature in advanced chemistry and nano materials that describe the formation of Iron Oxide nanofibers with a bubble- nanorod-structure. These carbon nanofibers can self assemble from nano size to any desirable size. They have similarities to electrolysis rods used in batteries as well as biosensing devices.

I also wish to show further live blood images that document the self assembly process from the spherical bubbles containing what appears to be similar structures to quantum dots that are emitting light in a pulsating fashion and changing colors - as I have showing in previous posts. Quantum dots also can self assemble.

I have previously shown video of microscopy of the filaments with bubbles attached, here is an image from C19 un injected blood:



In this video below I have captured the bubble self assembly in the blood of an unvaccinated individual who has had intimate contact with a C19 injected person.

These spheres are not triglycerides or bacteria, they are involved in the building of the filament structure as I have shown in my video with Maria Zeee.

(See video in the article--not embedded here)

In this publication you can see the bubbles are integral to building self assembly nano fibers which are used for example to create batteries:



Design and Synthesis of Bubble-Nanorod-Structured Fe 2 O 3 –Carbon Nanofibers as Advanced Anode Material for Li-Ion Batteries

Here is a drawing that shows the nano rod structure. Note that Clifford Carnicom has done studies on human blood which showed that the Iron of the red blood cells has been converted from Fe 2+ to Fe 3+, hence no longer transporting Oxygen and creating sludge like appearance of the blood with extremely decreased electrical conductivity by up to 47% in C19 un injected individuals. I believe these rods are hijacking our electricity and life force for self assembly:



Image: TOC-Bubble nanorod structure

Here you can see how porous nanostructures self assemble with significant similarities to what I am seeing in the live blood:



I wish to draw attention to the image showing a nanotube with metals circled in red:



On the right you see a closer look at this porous metal carbon nano fiber. On the left you see a filament from live blood from the video above with active bubble emission, with similar metallic filament inclusions:



Here is a video of the active bubble emission that look just like a water electrolysis process - you can click on the link and watch the video to show you how this battery works:
https://www.sciencephoto.com/media/6...lysis-of-water

Electrolysis of water

Here we can see further classic carbon nano tubes that self assemble and are coated with metals like iron. I have seen the exact structures as below in human un injected blood. Everyone has them now.



Structural design and environmental applications of electrospun nanofibers

Here is an article describing how these carbon nano fibers can be used as batteries ( and other electronic devices):





Codoped porous carbon nanofibres as a potassium metal host for nonaqueous K-ion batteries

In this article you can find more explanation on how this works FOR BIOLOGICAL SENSING APPLICATIONS: Preparation, Characterization, and Applications of Electrospun Carbon Nanofibers and Its Composites





These metal NP-supported CNF nanocomposites have shown great promises in catalysis [21], fuel cells [22], and highly sensitive chemical/biological sensing applications [23, 24]. In particularly, the CNF composites showed excellent results in various catalytic systems such as in photocatalytic activity [25, 26], water gas shift reactions (WGS) [27], enzyme immobilization or biocatalysts [28, 29], and direct oxidation of alcohols.

Please note the association of the growth of “bubbles” that are responsible for the self assembly of the fibers on a larger and larger scale. There is no limit to self assembly, the growth process starts on the nano scale and can build skyscrapers if so programmed. This is a large sphere that starts to develop structure of filament in the surrounding - all images are from C19 un-injected blood. In my understanding, this technology has self spread regardless of injection status at this time due to contamination from environmental and C19 injected sources.



This shows how such a sphere builds a filament, this time red.



This is a sphere that reshaped itself to create a filament. 100x magnification



Below you can see the filament being constructed from the spheres that release their innards.



This is a higher magnification 200x clearly showing the spheres building the filament in the blood.



This image below is embalmed blood of someone deceased 8 months ago. You can see the filament looks the same. In my recent interview with Maria Zeee it shows how the small spheres are self assembling, they have different colors just like quantum dots. The process does not stop with death of the organism.



Summary:

I believe that what Celeste Solum described in her interview with Maria Zeee is already happening. The C19 un-injected are being changed into Cyborgs and the technology is rapidly evolving.

EXCLUSIVE: Celeste Solum – The End Game, Synthetic Biology EXPOSED!!!
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
·
MAY 5

GO here to see the video--https://zeeemedia.com/interview/exclusive-celeste-solum-the-end-game-synthetic-biology-exposed/

EXCLUSIVE: Celeste Solum – The End Game, Synthetic Biology EXPOSED!!! This interview of two amazing women that I highly respect and have the privilege to know, Celeste exposes and confirms everything I have been speaking about. I highly recommend this to everyone. Please share it.

Read full story:https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m-the-end-game

I urge all human beings to look at this with utmost urgency and demand answers and solutions, as well as accountability for war crimes against all perpetrators.

Our world and human species is dying.

Will you not wake up and save Life itself?

Dr. Ana’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. "

[onawah]

The Hydrogel Conspiracy - Decoding The Link Between Morgellons & Covid-19 - The Lazarus Initiative - My Interview With Sasha Stone Live Streams Saturday 3:45 PM PST
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
JUN 22, 2023
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email


https://lazarusinitiative.com/live-stream/bonus-june/

The Hydrogel Conspiracy - Decoding The Link Between Morgellons & Covid-19

"I was invited to speak with Sasha Stone. It was like meeting a spiritual brother, and we had my favorite kind of conversation, which is “Truth by Firehose.” In pure, unadulterated unfiltered truth - love abides.

We cover my research on hydrogel, synthetic biology, Morgellons/ CDB, spiritual awakening, operation Paperclip, Nazi Germany and the US government connection, the occult technologies and Alien Agenda.

Since we discussed demonology and Cathy O’Brien’s revelations as an MK Ultra Mind Control Survivor Whistleblower - I was invited for a Q&A with Cathy and Sasha tomorrow.

Cathy O‘Brien is one of my all time heroes and it is the first time I am meeting her. I read her book “TRANCE formation of America” and “Access Denied: For Reasons of National Security” about 15 years ago and it was a major eye opener in my life to the pedophile satanist perverted degenerated filth we call the “Elites” and the government operations that are criminal and satanic beyond the worst imagination possible.

TRANCE Formation of America is the first documented autobiography of a victim of government mind control. Cathy O’Brien is a healed and vocal survivor of the Central Intelligence Agency’s MK-Ultra Project Monarch operation.

Tracing her path from child pornography and recruitment into the program to serving as a top-level intelligence agent and White House sex slave, TRANCE Formation of America is a definitive eye-witness account of government corruption that implicates some of the most prominent figures in U.S. politics.

You will not look at people like Hilary Clinton, Dick Cheney and many other paid and blackmailed deceivers called “politicians” with much more then disgust. At least that is what I see. Demonic creatures that behave worse than any animal...yet they refer to us as “hackable animals.” When you read this, you will understand why we need military tribunals - once we clean out our military of the transhumanist satanists.

Cathy’s book “PTSD - A Time to Heal” is magnificent. I was trained as a psychiatrist and spiritual healer and have read a lot of materials in the field. Cathy’s book is a true jewel and I found her insights wise, loving, effective and beautiful - a must read for anyone dealing with trauma or anyone working to help people who experienced unfathomable trauma.

If you have not yet read her books, get them now. She is definitely a “Truth by Firehose” kind of individual, and an example that the worst imaginable abuse and trauma can be overcome - speaking to the indominable spirit and divine essence that lives within us all.

Here is her website:https://trance-formation.com/

TRANCE formation of America

It is because of brave individuals like her that this world’s eyes are opened to the evil military industrial complex deceptions that have run and destroyed so much of our lives.

I am so excited to meet my hero and I hope you watch the symposium to expose Morgellons/ synthetic biology. I am not sure when the Q&A with Cathy will be shown, but my interview with Sasha will be live streamed at 3:45pm PST. Sasha generously allowed that I share this link above and my subscribers can watch it free of charge.

Please check out his website and subscribe here: Sasha Stone https://sachastone.com/about/

Many other fabulous speakers have been interviewed including my friend Elana Freeland. I highly recommend her books too, especially Geoengineered Transhumanism. You can find her site here: Elana Freeland https://www.elanafreeland.com/geoeng...-transhumanism

Meeting such bright lights always gives me hope.

I send you all much gratitude for all your messages and comments, please forgive when I cannot keep up - but I appreciate you none the less, wherever you are.

Remember that love, hope, resilience, truth and our realization of oneness as humanity helps us day by day to get through these times, always evolving in knowledge and wisdom. Life on this magnificent planet is a beautiful gift and worth fighting for.

The Truth is getting out.

God wins.

💙💙💙

Dr. Ana’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. "

[onawah]

Dr. Robert Malone on the Truth about Peter Hotez
78K followers
6/22/23
(Worth watching--Video below)

"Wow: Dr. Robert Malone describes Peter Hotez’s role in creating COVID-19 in Wuhan, the exorbitant payments he’s received from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and his efforts to label critics of the vaccine as racists and anti-Semites."

https://sovren.media/video/dr-robert...otez-3301.html

https://rumble.com/v2v2g8e-dr.-rober...vaccine-a.html

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2sh0yy

[Icare]

Very sad data about child deaths after being vaxxed:

[onawah]

It’s Time to Blow the Lid off the Global ‘Health’ System
6/25/23
Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD from Dr. Ana’s Newsletter
anamihalceamdphd@substack.com
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#in...HfJQWrCGhMZfsv

(Not all hyperlinks are embedded here. See the article at the link for many more.)

"Dr. Ana’s Newsletter cross-posted a post from The Kingston Report
Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
Jun 25 · Dr. Ana’s Newsletter
Karen Kingston's expose about the dangers of nanotechnology is phenomenal. She - as I also have -points out the danger of the medical freedom movement denying its presence and preventing millions of people from getting adequate treatment. We demand further scientific research into solutions and the acknowledgment of what I and others have found in humanities blood! We must jointly blow the cover of this problem, that may well mean planetary extinction if we do not immediately take action for mitigation. I offer any denying freedom movement physician a free live blood analysis. See for yourself in your own blood! Please share this article far and wide. Let the evidence sink in. It is mounting and becoming UNDENIABLE.

It’s Time to Blow the Lid off the Global ‘Health’ System
Denying the Use of Nanotechnology in the COVID-19 Injections Has Made the Medical Freedom Movement Powerless in their Efforts to Prosecute Pfizer and other Criminals
JUN 25
https://karenkingston.substack.com/p...sFreemail=true

In 2020, the formerly secretive multi-trillion dollar nanotechnology/synthetic biology industry exploded around the globe with the introduction of COVID-19 injections. The nanotechnology industry is an unregulated, ‘dual-use’ industry with military weapons and consumer applications that has been causing mild-to-severe cognitive dysfunctions, infertility, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and death for decades.

The COVID-19 injections are engineered modRNA nanoparticle injections that are classified as electromagnetic devices. Don’t believe me? Then just read the Pfizer DoD contract and FDA guidance that clearly defines the mRNA nanoparticles as electromagnetic devices. Or read Dr. Ana Mihalcea’s SubStack articles where you can ‘see for yourself’ the nanotechnology in the blood of the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

Lying about the Use of Nanotechnology Has Made the Medical Freedom Movement Powerless in their Efforts to Prosecute Pfizer and other Criminals
There are Freedom Movement leaders who claim that discussing nanotechnology will weaken efforts to remove the injections from the market when in fact, the exact opposite is true. The nanotechnology industry is barely regulated in America. Essentially the FDA, the consumer protection agency, and EPA all said, “We’re going to let the manufacturers regulate themselves.”

A virtually unregulated industry means that there are no laws or government agencies protecting Pfizer and other manufacturers from civil and criminal liability for enabling the injection adults and children with engineered modRNA nanoparticles that are known toxic pathogens and electromagnetic devices.

In other words, the Childhood Vaccine Protection doesn’t protect Pfizer from injecting children with electromagnetic nanoparticles and pretending Pfizer has liability protection shielded by the US military is a completely fabricated story.

When Freedom Movement leaders and global civilians acknowledge that billions of innocent adults and children have been injected and poisoned with engineered nanoparticles that are ‘vaccine nanotechnologies’ that have a dual-use as weapons of biowarfare, I believe everyone of a a sound mind will do everything in in their power to remove the COVID-19 injections from communities around the globe.



We must demand immediate prosecution of Pfizer from our government officials and law enforcement, beginning with seizing the company’s assets.

Share this SubStack Far and Wide
I implore you to share this interview with Stew Peters and this free Substack with all influential connections you have; from government officials to your pastors to media platforms and Freedom Movement experts.

This post is FREE!. Feel free to share: https://karenkingston.substack.com/p...sFreemail=true

Originally published June 21, 2023: When an individual (or group of individuals) with proclivities to act in deceptive, manipulative, and harmful ways are caught in a transgression their typical responses would include things, such as; denying the transgression ever happened; or denying that they know their co-conspirators; or even calling the witnesses to their crimes ‘not credible’ and ‘emotionally unstable’; but would they go so far as to deny the very existence of the weapons that they used?

I mean….how brilliant would it be if a group of global tyrannical elites could assault the human population with engineered nanoparticle technologies that are defined as weapons of mass destruction by our own US government; and then deny the engineered nanoparticle technologies even exist, because….the global elites are controlling the leaders of the global citizens who are trying to stop their mass extermination plan.

What a crazy idea, right?



Or are we being mocked?

“The component of the Mockery of the Victim is a show of macabre arrogance when done in a veiled or symbolic fashion and eliciting no significant response of opposition from the victim is one of the most efficacious techniques in psychological warfare.”

Don’t let them mock us anymor.
Leaders of the Health Freedom Movement are denying the existence of nanotechnologies in the COVID-19 mRNA nanoparticle injections even though there are hundreds of industry documents clearly stating the that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain nanotechnologies that are for the purposes of merging biological humans with digital technologies.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ful...m_medium=email



If we look at the secretive use of nanotechnologies objectively (and without trolling and name calling), the nanotechnology industry is a multi-trillion dollar industry and is absolutely booming in the synthetic biology sector with the release of the COVID-19 engineered mRNA nanoparticle viruses, spike proteins, and injections.



Nanotech got another mega-boost in the neurotech/neuroweapons space with the recent news coverage of Neuralink (Neuralace).

Neuralink and mRNA Technologies are Weapons of Mass Destruction
KAREN KINGSTON
·
JUN 6


Updated June 8, 2023: Blackrock Neurotech has pioneered the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology similar to Neuralink. Blackrock Neurotech received FDA 510k clearance for use in humans in 2007. Per Blackrock Neurotech, the company is not affiliated with Blackrock.

Read full story: https://karenkingston.substack.com/p...m_medium=email

James Giordano, advisor to the US Military and Intelligence Community, wrote that neurostim technologies and neurotechnology nanoparticles (such as Neuralink/Neuralace), “should not be considered for their mass destruction effects.”



Really James? “Nanoparticle technologies should NOT be considered for their weapons of mass destruction effects,” because in this 2018 video, Giordano informs the US Army WestPoint Cadets that;

“The brain is and will be the 21st century battlefield in many ways. End of story. You will encounter some form of neurocognitive science that has been weaponized not only in your military career, but in your personal and professional lives.”



“Importantly is this other acronym WMD2… this is part of a regular and ongoing innovation in your careers. Weapons of Mass Destruction and Disruption, disruption and influence will be the key to creating peer capabilities and asymmetrical relations and engagements.”

- James Giordano, West Point Modern War Institute, 2018

If you visit James Giordano’s website, he has over a dozen publications and presentations explaining how neuroweapon technologies and nanoparticle WMDs can be used on civilians by creating join-partnerships with the private sector and creating markets and demands for the use of nanoparticle technologies on humans and other biological life forms.

Nanotechnology is for the Purposes of Directed Evolution (Transhumanism)
Dr. Robert Malone, the self-proclaimed inventor of mRNA nanoparticle technology, has even publicly stated that the mRNA technologies are the ‘suite of technologies that are the entry point to transhumanism.’ Transhumanism is the forced evolution of the human species using engineered mRNA nanoparticles to make non-human genetic changes and bio-digital changes to the DNA of human beings. Transhumanism’s end game is the extermination of the human species. Transhumanism is the definition of biowarfare.

Dr. Malone has alluded to the fact that the SARS-2 modRNA spike proteins found in the COVID-19 injections are engineered mRNA neuroweapons that cross the blood-brain barrier causing brain inflammation.



Specifically on Joe Rogan: https://open.spotify.com/episode/3SC...ium=email&nd=1
...Dr. Malone stated:

Elon Musk is openly manufacturing mRNA microfactories, nano-batteries, and nanotech neuroweapons with funding from the World Economic Forum and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://karenkingston.substack.com/p...m_medium=email

Despite all of this evidence right in front of our own eyes, the discussion of nanotech itself is ‘off the table’ with most of the platforms and leaders of the Medical Freedom movement with the exception of a select few media platforms, such as the Stew Peters network.

The Multi-Trillion Dollar ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Industry that’s Funded by US Tax Payer Dollars and Will Destroy the Planet
Nanotechnologies are not only used in electronics and smart devices, but nanotech is also used in biological products, medical products, foods, dietary supplements, cosmetics, water sanitization, agriculture, and tobacco products.

Industry experts are well-aware that the use of engineered nanoparticle technologies is rampant, harming biological life forms and our planet at an accelerated rate.



The National Nanotechnology Initiative was launched in 2000 and is funded annually by tax payer dollars per the President of the United States’ annual budget.



Throughout the early 2000’s, tens of thousand of new applications for nanotechnology were being developed from use in electronics and smart devices, to beverage and food preservatives, to fertilizers for soil and water sanitization, and for creating synthetic viruses (i.e. coronaviruses) and bacteria.



Beginning in the 2000’s until today, hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed articles were published and global symposiums were held to discuss the environmental, health and safety risks of engineered nanoparticles.



In 2007, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) put into legislation REACH (Registration, Authorization, and Restriction of Chemicals) and in 2010 set their first mandatory safety guidelines regarding the quantity, type of material and safety of manufacturing of nanomaterials.



The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) put together draft (unenforceable) guidelines in 2017 that are worth less than the piece of paper they were printed on. However, the following year, NIOSH issued a 7-year safety plan to protect workers who manufacture nanotechnologies.



Let that sink in. In 2018, the National Institute for Safety and Health (NIOSH) issued guidelines for workers who may be exposed to engineered nanoparticles via inhalation or skin contact, and then in December of 2020, Pfizer and the biotech industry began injecting billions of global civilians with engineered nanoparticles directly into their bodies and bloodstreams.

In 2014, the FDA published Guidance for the Nanotechnology Industry essentially saying it was up to the industry leaders to regulate the safety of the use of nanotechnologies in medical products, foods, dietary supplements, cosmetics and tobacco products.



Tyrants of the Nanotechnology Industry Proclaim "There is NO Nanotech Industry!"
Not surprisingly, according to a 2009 Survey of Nanotechnology Leaders (aka ‘nanotech tyrants’), when asked to participate in a survey on the nanotech industry, the leaders of the nanotech industry first responses were to ‘deny the existence of the nanotechnology industry.’



When asked about educating consumers, the tyrants of industry responded with the general consensus that consumer education about the use of nanotechnologies was ‘not necessary’ and would be ‘bad for business.’

Is it “bad for business” to educate consumers on nanoparticle technologies? Well… I don’t know…Do you think if consumers knew that inhaling, ingesting, or being directly injected with engineered nanoparticles, has toxic effects on their lungs, kidneys, livers, hearts, brains and reproductive organs (including hormones and sex drive); they would have said, “No thank you,” or even organize a movement to criminalize the use of mRNA technologies and engineered nanoparticles in humans, animals, and even water sanitation?



Per the survey, when asked about safety regulations, the industry leaders agreed that it was in the ‘best interest of consumers for the industry to regulate the safety of nanotechnologies’ because industry would ‘ultimately be the ones liable for safety’ not the FDA or regulatory bodies. “One subject added that companies cannot use regulatory decisions as a defense in a court of law and thus are the ones ultimately liable for safety in a legal sense.” Can we all agree that we can sue Pfizer now?

Nanotechnology is Nanotoxic at the Genetic Level
Nanotechnology isn’t nano-amazing. It’s nano-toxic. Nanotechnology is destroying the human species at the mitochondrial level - meaning it’s destroying our DNA.



Nanotechnology has infiltrated all areas of our life. We’ve been told nanotechnology is all ‘in our imagination,’ and even if it does exists, ‘it’s perfectly safe.



Nanotechnology may be invisible to the human eye, but it is very real. Nanoparticle technologies were developed as weapons of mass destruction and are now being used to injure us and our children through adulteration of our medications, supplements, food, water, and through the most potent delivery mechanism, in ‘vaccines.’

The only reason why nanotechnology has grown into a global, multi-trillion dollar industry that is slowly disabling and sterilizing humanity is because it has been kept as secret from global citizens. Why are so many medical freedom leaders in lock-step with denying the existence of these technologies, specifically the use of nanoparticle technologies in the COVID-19 injections? Were they told that if they bring up nanotechnology during interviews that they will be blacklisted from larger media platforms and kicked out of the movement? (like I was told).

Showing Light on the Darkness is the Only Way Out
Nanotechnology is the one topic that is imperative to remain a secret in order to force a bio-digital dystopia upon humanity and for our enemies to win.

If scientists, doctors, and attorneys continue to look for lab-made biological origins to explain a nanotechnology assault on the human species, humanity will be left in the dust.

mRNA ‘vaccines’ and ‘coronaviruses’ are advanced engineered nanoparticles. They are self-assembling nanotechnologies that develop from the nano size to the micro size to the scale of visible synthetic structures inside the human body, aka ‘white fibrous clots that do not not dissolve.’ See #diedsuddenly

Do we deny the existence of these mRNA engineered nanoparticles because we have medical, legal, and mRNA experts who can not be questioned or debated because when they say ‘There is no nanotech,’ that means “There must be no nanotech!”

Despite what other experts have found in the COVID-19 vials and vaccinated blood; despite hundreds of patents, thousands and thousands of peer-reviewed journals, corporate pharma websites, FDA filings, and a more than $3 trillion nanotechnology industry that exists right here and now across our food supply, cosmetics, supplements, water transportation, water filtration, medicines, and vaccines, including $billions in the manufacturing of graphene oxide nanoparticles.

A select few leaders have shown us dozens of credible documents or actual vaccine vial samples or blood samples, showing us the evidence of nanotechnology in the COVDI-19 injections in a way we can easily understand and quite literally ‘see for ourselves.’

Are Synthetic Biology, mRNA and Ai Directing the Evolution of Humans to the Point of Extinction?
KAREN KINGSTON
·
JUN 9


June 9, 2023: On June 2, 2023, I had the honor of being part of a synthetic biology (SynBio) discussion with two pro-freedom, pro-humanity leaders that I greatly respect, appreciate, and consider dear friends, Dr. Ana Mihalcea and Maria Zeee. While SynBio experts

Read full story:https://karenkingston.substack.com/p...m_medium=email

What if some of the leaders of the Freedom Movement have been manipulated, bribed, or even blackmailed into avoiding the discussion of engineered nanoparticle technologies? Are we unknowingly supporting the controlled opposition to our own mission of restoring America and seeking justice against those who waged this bioweapon attack on humanity? How can you tell if someone is an independent critical thinker or being controlled? Easy, ask them to address the self-assembling nanotechnology in the COVID-19 vials and blood of the vaccinated.

We Must Unite
I do agree we must unite, but we must unite under truth and God. Pray that leaders will stop going along with the false narrative that ‘there is no nanotech’ out of fear of being cast out of the ‘leaders of the freedom movement’ or simply because they’re too prideful to admit they got something wrong.

None of us are infallible. Getting something wrong regarding the convergence of the most advanced fields of biology and technology ever to be developed in the history of mankind is to be expected…. that is…if you’re still human.

May God save humanity.

The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.
Colossians 2
I want you to know how hard I am contending for you and for all who have not met me personally. My goal is that they may be encouraged in heart and united in love, so that they may have the full riches of complete understanding, in order that they may know the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.

I tell you this so that no one may deceive you by fine-sounding arguments. See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.

I strongly recommend subscribing to Dr. Ana Mihalcea’s SubStack to stay up to date on nanotechnology and for effective treatments to detox.




Originally posted on The Kingston Report
Karen Kingston
Subscribe: https://karenkingston.substack.com/s...m_medium=email
The Kingston Report is an evidence-based, med-legal analysis of mRNA technologies and the dangers of the rapidly growing synthetic biology industry.

© 2023 Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104 "


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2oekqu/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

C19 Un-injected Live Blood Images Documenting Nano Technology Self Assembly, Increased Blood Coagulation and Blood Toxicity
Dr. Ana’s Newsletter
JUN 24, 2023
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email

(Lots more photos of infected blood and explanations from Dr. Ana)

Starting with:


Image above: hydrogel filament that looks like a device with highly abnormal surrounding blood

In my recent substacks, I have been showing the self assembly process of the hydrogel/CDB filaments from spheres filled with artificial intelligent particles. I want to continue documenting my findings of C19 un-injected blood showing a worsening of the toxicity of blood findings and an acceleration in self - assembly.

Many people cannot fathom that what I am saying is true. The only thing that I can do, is to continue to show you. I care about people, and what I find in the blood never ceases to shock me. I look at the person and I look at the blood and I pray to God for answers. I also pray for them to take it serious. Some do not, they ignore the findings, do not get any treatment, hence contaminate everyone around them. They, and the people around them, are headed towards disease and aging at an extreme rate. In this case, I believe that denial kills.

New Findings In Unvaccinated Live Blood Show Same Self Assembly Hydrogel Spheres As In Embalmed Blood Deceased With Huge Rubbery Clots. Shocking Research Verification: There Are No More Pure Bloods!
ANA MARIA MIHALCEA, MD, PHD
·
JUN 19



Much more at the link: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email

[onawah]

As if "anti-vaxxer" is an insult
Piercing the Veil of Reality
Bernhard Guenther
<bernhard@veilofreality.com> via s2.csa1.acemsc4.com
vgo_ee=%2BgKTIAOD3xQmesLuBP8l205GRNza5FuYLJ09Nq%2Fgsm8%3D%3AaOZMD6RRUrp26rFx7kl1IJSToSZ7Gjsc

"Of course, I'm against any vaccines and have been for decades since the 90s, thanks to Jon Rappoport's work and many other renegades exposing the lies.

I received two vaccines when I was a child in the 70s. That's it: 2 vaccines in my whole life. The last one was when I was six years old. My Mom refused any other vaccines, and I grew up very healthy. I would even go further than any "safe vaccine" proponents. There is no need for any vaccines, and there is no such thing as a "safe vaccine."

Once you see through the lies of virology, allopathic medicine, Big Pharma Cartel propaganda, media fear-propaganda, and Rockefeller-sponsored corrupted institutionalized medical education based on corrupted science and "appeal to authority - fallacy," and instead, you learn about the body-mind-spirit connection, the spiritual science behind any dis-ease, and not mistake symptoms for causes, how your psychology and unconscious [stress, fear, suppressed shadow/trauma] affects your biology, etc., your whole life changes.

You shift from disease care, which is what most mainstream "health care" is all about [especially when it's "free"], to preventive medicine/care, which is about the right lifestyle that is unique to you.

It means taking care of your emotional, psychological, and spiritual health via inner work, and finding your deeper purpose in life, so you don't chase the rat race of mindless materialism and consumption based on socially and culturally conditioned desires that are not your "own."

Many people get sick because they try to adjust to a world where pathologies have become normalized, going against their inner nature, and they've lost their inner guidance, which makes them more vulnerable to becoming authoritarian followers.

Staying healthy also implies the obvious physical self-care like the proper diet [but not what the WEF, WHO, Bill Gates, or the official "food pyramid" tells you are good for you], exercise (especially body-mind practices like yoga, Qi Gong), sun, spending time in nature, meditation, regular bodywork/massage/acupuncture, high-quality vitamins, etc.

Then you don't need state-sponsored "health care," and you will thrive. But it requires investing in yourself and taking responsibility for your life and health.

Fear and the Forces of Illness

Here's something I wrote 3.5 years ago, in February 2020, when the pandemic fear propaganda started. From my article Corona Fear Virus and the Forces of Illness:

[...] 'Keep in mind that from a matrix perspective, this whole COVID "epidemic" is way beyond the virus (or non-virus) itself but the primary intention is to infuse the fear frequency into the population for that will weaken your "protective" shield (aura) and create entry points for that what you are afraid of (not just illness.)

So, the most important attitude is to reject fear and any "suggestion" of the illness or anything else you may be afraid of. You can take care of your physical health as much as you want with supplements, vitamins, food, etc., but if there is still fear or it is driven by fear, there will be entry points for the illness to come in.

Essentially, any fear you have is rooted in the fear of death, which keeps you from truly living, and that is exactly why the matrix occult forces want to keep you chained to fear: it diminishes your divine power, essence, creativity, and freedom, essentially keeping you in a frequency prison out of your own manipulated/conditioned "free will'.

'It is impossible to truly love life as long as one fears death. This can be constantly corroborated when observing human reactions. The more a person lives with gusto and joy, the less he or she fears death. The more people shrink in fear from death, the more they cling to life, not because they enjoy life or because they are dynamically related to it, but in order to avoid death. Such people really do not live at all.

Every aspect of living follows this principle. If you desire health in a spirit of fearing sickness, you prevent health. If you fear the aging process, you prevent eternal youth. If you fear poverty, you prevent abundance. If you fear loneliness, you prevent real companionship. If you fear companionship, you prevent self-containment. So it goes on and on…'

– Eva Pierrakos

'That is how illnesses try to come from one person to another — they attack, by a suggestion like this or otherwise, the nervous being and try to come in. Even if the illness is not contagious.

There is a sort of protection around the body which we call the nervous envelope [aura] — if this remains strong and refuses entrance to the illness force, then one can remain well even in the midst of plague or other epidemics — if the envelope is pierced or weak, then illness can come in.

They [the forces of illness] first weaken or break through the nervous envelope, the aura. If that is strong and whole, a thousand million germs will not be able to do anything to you. The envelope pierced, they attack the subconscient mind in the body, sometimes also the vital mind or mind proper — prepare the illness by fear or thought of illness.

Nothing to take away the resistance like fear. But still the subconscient is the main thing. If the contrary Force is strong in the body, one can move in the midst of plague and cholera and never get contaminated. Plague too, rats dying all around, people passing into Hades. I have seen that myself in Baroda.'

- Sri Aurobindo

[...] Going a bit deeper with the Coronavirus scare and artificially created crisis/epidemic, the Powers That Be (PTB) behind the scenes (not your official puppet "representatives") understand occult and metaphysical laws very well, like Black Magic magicians and sorcerers of the dark side.

As I mentioned above, the PTB (vessels for the occult hostile forces) attempt to create their desired reality THROUGH us. This is nothing new and has been going on for thousands of years. It's the ultimate mind control, for they understand the metaphysical consequences with regard to "reality creation".

It also ties into the Hegelian Dialect of Problem-Reaction-Solution, for they need the willing consent of the masses, i.e., their "free will" to go along with it even if it's manipulated "free" will, i.e., creating traps of agreement according to the occult law of agreement.

They put spells on the population, resulting in self-fulling prophecies vie FEAR and BELIEF. So, what we see now with this entirely artificially created massive fear frequency in the collective regarding the "virus" is that many people are getting sick and developing symptoms because of the SUGGESTION and manifest them in their own bodies even though there is no objective threat.

Fear damages the aura and energy body and lowers the protective energetic outer layer of the body, which in turn creates entry points for the suggestions to come in and manifest. This goes way beyond the over-simplified New Age idea of "Law of Attraction" and way beyond just having "negative thoughts" (One of the new age distortions about "reality creation").

So, if you feed into and believe the virus scare (or any illness scare) you are potentially creating disease/illness, not only potentially in yourself but in others as well via thought projections (which act like psychic attacks on occult levels), and help them manifest the reality they want to in order to further their agenda.[...]

- from "Corona Fear Virus and the Forces of Illness" (February 2020)

The protective layer - the aura - is also damaged by any vaccine and most pharmaceuticals (as Thomas Mayer wrote about in "The COVID Vaccines from a Spiritual Perspective"), as well as trauma, stress, unconscious shadow projections, living a lie, and going against the voice of your soul, etc.

In other words, the aura is a reflection of your holistic physical, psychological, emotional, and spiritual health.

Does it mean you won't ever get sick again? No, and you will still die at some point, like everyone else, because that's called the cycle of life and death in our current state of evolution, but you won't live in fear of disease or death because you are also not identified with your body anymore, but you do take care of it and honor it as it is the vessel for your soul-being.

There is also the mystery of life and God's/The Divine's plan, your karmic lessons over lifetimes based on the immutable universal law of cause & effect, which can also manifest in dis-ease, and the cause is sometimes not that obvious. Sometimes illnesses are necessary initiations on spiritual levels and to process karma, as Rudolf Steiner talked about.

But all that is just 'nonsense' and 'dangerous misinformation' to the tunnel-vision view of the hard-core materialist whom you will never be able to convince.

We still live in the dark age of materialism. Once the world and the people are ready to embrace spiritual science, the whole game changes collectively, but it's still a long way to go.

Godspeed.
Bernhard Guenther "

See: https://veilofreality.com/?vgo_ee=%2...l1IJSToSZ7Gjsc

Posted by onawah (here)
That tallies somewhat with Rudolf Steiner's warning that the Vaxx would cause in humans a spiritual split.
See:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1516496
and
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1502064

This certainly sheds light on why the unvaxxed can't seem to get through to the vaxxed.

Posted by Seeclearly (here)
Here's a tweet from Bernhard Guenther, we're he gives a bullet point summary of his view on the vaccines consequences on the soul .He claims that the vaccines deliver Soratic Transhumanism Spirits .
A note of caution, the full article is very heavy hypothesis but not one without hope .

[Gwin Ru]

...

... and medical crimes:

Dr. Lee Merritt Interviews Dr. Lawrence Palevsky 1:10:48

GrassRootsWarriorNetwork
1 day ago

Dr. Lee Merritt. Frontline Doctor Dr Lawrence Palevsky Great Awakening Nescara GRWN Kevin Hoyt Denise Bliss Philips

Dr. Lee Merritt Interviews Dr. Lawrence Palevsky.

www.themedicalrebel.com

Grassroots Warrior Network-A plethora of your favorite content providers all in one place and always FREE to view. Accurate, balanced, and solid information YOU can count on. Spiritual, educational and news/politics - For THE PEOPLE by THE PEOPLE and paid for by public support and viewers like you!

Who is ready to be a Grassroots WARRIOR? If YOU would like to join the colony and support our effort, here's how you can help- SHARES HELP too!

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2tkh2w

[onawah]

Contaminated COVID Products and Green Monkey Virus
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
June 26, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1839061072

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...-shots-pdf.pdf

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Microbiologist Kevin McKernan and his team recently discovered simian virus 40 (SV40) promoters in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s bivalent mRNA COVID shots
SV40 have long been suspected of causing cancer in humans
DNA contaminants may have the ability to alter the human genome.
One of Pfizer’s vials also had an SV40 promoter with a nuclear localization sequence (NLS), a 72 base pair insertion that makes the promoter “much more aggressive and also drives the sequence into the nucleus” of the cell
DNA contamination is a warning sign that endotoxin, which causes anaphylaxis when injected, may be present
A cinnamycin-resistant gene is also included in the sequencing vector, and it’s unclear if or how this might impact human health.
In a worst case scenario, it could make your microbiome resistant to antibiotics

In the video (below), Jessica Rose, Ph.D., interviews microbiologist Kevin McKernan on “Good Morning CHD.” McKernan’s team recently discovered1,2,3,4 simian virus 40 (SV40) promoters in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s bivalent mRNA COVID shots, which, for decades, have been suspected of causing cancer in humans.5 As explained in the abstract, posted on OSF Preprints in April 2023:6

“Several methods were deployed to assess the nucleic acid composition of four expired vials of the Moderna and Pfizer bivalent mRNA vaccines. Two vials from each vendor were evaluated ... Multiple assays support DNA contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agency (EMA) 330ng/mg requirement and the FDAs 10ng/dose requirements ...”

Equally, if not more, troubling, these DNA contaminants also can alter the human genome. As explained by McKernan, genomic sequencing involves reading the letters of the genome, A, T, C and G, which make up the DNA code. Both DNA and RNA can be sequenced in this manner.

DNA can be likened to a copy of the hard drive of your cell, while RNA is like your task manager, dictating the software program being run in a given moment. When you sequence RNA, you get a sense of what the cell is being instructed to do, while sequencing DNA tells you everything the cell could possibly do if the proper instructions are present.

COVID Shots Contain Both RNA and DNA
It’s been assumed that the COVID shots contained only RNA, but using genomic sequencing, McKernan discovered they contain DNA fragments as well, and there really should not be any. The RNA is basically copied, or “Xeroxed” off the DNA, and only the RNA should be in the final product.

As noted by McKernan, the DNA used is proprietary. “They don’t want people to know all the tricks they put in the DNA to drive maximum amount of Xeroxing, if you will.” But what popped out during sequencing was the entire sequencing vector, “which shows us everything they’re doing to drive the expression of this RNA,” McKernan says.

So, we now know they’re using a T7 promoter, an SV40 promoter, an antibiotic-resistance gene, that the replication is bacterial in origin and more. As explained by McKernan, to get the amount of RNA required for these shots, you need very large amounts of DNA. To get the DNA required, a piece of DNA that codes for RNA in a circle, called a plasmid, was created and then reproduced inside E. coli in a huge vat.

Plasmids are unique in that they have an origin of replication that allows the DNA to copy itself several hundred times inside every cell of the E. coli, and, since bacteria double every 20 minutes, you get exponential amplification of the DNA overnight.

The DNA must then be extracted from the E. coli and purified. Once that’s done, a T7 in vitro transcription reaction is run on the purified DNA, which copies the RNA off that DNA.

The plasmid that is put in with the E. coli — the sequencing vector — is the blueprint for how the RNA is made, and this is what McKernan found, in its entirety, in the vials. It really should not be there. Only the purified RNA should be present.

Regulatory agencies have an acceptable upper limit for double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in medical products, but the DNA McKernan found was orders of magnitude higher than those thresholds.

The arbitrary limit for dsDNA set by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is 330 nanograms per milligram (ng/mg), but McKernan suspects that limit isn’t stringent enough, because they probably didn’t consider that it might include replicable DNA. In all likelihood, this limit was primarily based on concerns about E. coli DNA, which might get mixed in.

In a May 20, 2023, Substack article,7 McKernan also pointed out that Pfizer itself submitted evidence to the EMA showing sampled lots contained anywhere from 1 ng/mg to 815 ng/mg of DNA, so regulators knew they had quality control problems from the start. In McKernan’s testing, the highest level of DNA contamination found was 30%, which is rather astounding.

Endotoxin Concerns
McKernan also explains that one of the primary concerns when pulling plasmids out of E. coli is the fact that endotoxins frequently tag along. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an endotoxin, sits on the outside of gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli. When endotoxin is injected, it can cause anaphylaxis, and life-threatening anaphylaxis just so happens to be among the most commonly reported side effects of these shots. According to McKernan:8

“Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected ... You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA ...”

What Is the SV40 Promoter For?
As mentioned earlier, the sequencing vector found also included an SV40 promoter. To be clear, this is not the whole virus. It’s only the promoter, meaning a specific portion of the viral DNA that is essential for gene expression. The problem is that this particular promoter is known to be problematic.

SV40 promoters have been studied for years and are known to trigger cancer when encountering an oncogene (a gene that has the potential to cause cancer). What’s more, McKernan found that one of the Pfizer vials had not just one but two SV40 promoters.

One of them had a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) that the other didn’t have — a 72 base pair insertion for a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) that makes the promoter “much more aggressive and also drives the sequence into the nucleus” of the cell. NLS is basically a sequence that tags a given protein for import into the cell nucleus, and this further heightens the risk of genome integration.

You can get [genome] integration off these vectors alone, and if vectors have things that localize in the nucleus, then odds go up tremendously that there could be genome integration going on. ~ Kevin McKernan
Now, this second, more aggressive promoter was only found in one of the two Pfizer vials tested, even though they were from the same lot. What might account for this remarkable quality discrepancy? At bare minimum, it suggests Pfizer is changing its manufacturing on the fly, without oversight. Changing the plasmid used is a major change in manufacturing that really should require regulatory oversight, McKernan notes.

As for why any of the SV40 promoters are in there, McKernan in certain that it was part of an intentional design, as these promoters have a long research history.

Genome Integration Can Occur in More Ways Than One
The reason NLS is so concerning is because it can drive genome integration even in the absence of LINE-1 (long interspersed nuclear elements 1), which allow for insertions, deletions and rearrangements within the genome through reverse transcription.

“If you’re injecting this much DNA, you don’t need LINE-1 at all. You can get integration off these vectors alone, and if vectors have things that localize in the nucleus, then odds go up tremendously that there could be genome integration going on,” McKernan says.

Cytoplasmic transfection can also allow for genetic manipulation because the nucleus disassembles and exchanges cellular components with the cytosol during cell division.

Even if genetic modification does not occur, the fact that you’re getting foreign DNA into your cells can pose a risk. Partial expression could occur, for example, or it might interfere with other transcription translations that are already in the cell.

How Might Cinnamycin Resistance Gene Affect Human Health?
Rose and McKernan also discuss how the cinnamycin-resistant gene found in the sequencing vector might impact human health. What happens if this gets into a patient and encounters bacteria? Will it make that bacteria resistant to cinnamycin (a tricyclic antibiotic)?

“While speculative, at the moment, we would assume yes,” McKernan says. “Plasmids get absorbed by bacteria at 37 degrees (Celsius) temperature, which is the temperature of your gut ... and if they can confer any selective advantage, then they’re going to replicate and become the dominant species in your microbiome.”

Possibly, it might require the patient to be on an antibiotic when this occurs, as this is what would give the bacteria the selective advantage. Still, antibiotic use is quite common, so this is not a concern that should be discarded off hand. Potentially, these bivalent jabs may be spreading antibiotic resistance through the injected population, which could have grave consequences.

Will Your Microbiome Produce Spike Protein?
A related question is whether your microbiome might also produce spike protein permanently. McKernan suspects the bacteria will make spike RNA, but bacterial ribosomes don’t have the right equipment to read that RNA, so they probably won’t be able to translate it.

That said, bacteria are frequently absorbed by mammalian cells in a process called bactofection, and this is a known gene transfer technique.9 So, this may result in your cells producing spike protein.

The RNA in the COVID jab is also modified to resist breakdown, so you really have two versions of the spike protein that can persist longer than anticipated, and the spike protein, of course, is the most toxic part of the virus that can cause your body to attack itself.

“The real concern is we’ve got an amplifiable piece of DNA that can replicate in bacteria,” McKernan says. “Your body is loaded with bacteria [and] it’s going to start replicating this DNA once it’s inside of them, and we don’t know what’s going to happen after that.

It could make RNA, it could get absorbed into mammalian cells, it could be killed and completely gotten rid of. But the DNA shouldn’t be there to begin with. So, we have to start monitoring how much DNA is actually in lot to lot? What is its length? Is it circular? And how much of it can we tolerate?”

McKernan Calls on Scientists to Reproduce His Results
On his Substack, McKernan has published all the details10 scientists and labs would need to rapidly and inexpensively replicate his investigation and assess the dsDNA contamination of COVID shots around the world, and he’s urging researchers to do so.
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/ra...-assessing-the

According to McKernan, one team has already contacted him saying they found sequencing vector in the original monovalent COVID shots. Their findings will hopefully be released shortly.

Resources for Those Injured by the COVID Jab
The more we learn about the COVID jabs, the worse they appear. If you got one or more jabs and are now reconsidering, first and foremost, never ever take another COVID booster, another mRNA gene therapy shot or regular vaccine.

You need to end the assault on your body. Even if you haven’t experienced any obvious side effects, your health may still be impacted long-term, so don’t take any more shots.

If you’re suffering from side effects, your first order of business is to eliminate the spike protein that your body is producing. Two remedies that can do this are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Both drugs bind and facilitate the removal of spike protein.

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has developed a post-vaccine treatment protocol called I-RECOVER.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/prot...ine-treatment/
...Since the protocol is continuously updated as more data become available, your best bet is to download the latest version straight from the FLCCC website at covid19criticalcare.com11 (hyperlink to the correct page provided above).

For additional suggestions, check out the World Health Council’s spike protein detox guide,12 which focuses on natural substances like herbs, supplements and teas. https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/spike-protein-detox
To combat neurotoxic effects of spike protein, a March 2022 review paper13 suggests using luteolin and quercetin. Time-restricted eating (TRE) and/or sauna therapy can also help eliminate toxic proteins by stimulating autophagy."

Sources and References
1, 6 OSF Preprints April 10, 2023, Edited April 11, 2023 DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/b9t7m
2 Twitter KanekoaTheGreat May 20, 2023
3, 7 Anandamide (Kevin McKernan) Substack May 20, 2023
4 The Healthcare Channel May 22, 2023
5 Expert Rev Respir Med October 2011; 5(5): 683-697
8 The Health Care Channel, Greer Journal Why the COVID “mRNA” vaccines are actually DNA gene therapies that must be removed from the market
9 Gene Therapy September 15, 2005; 13: 101-105
10 Nepetalactone Newsletter March 22, 2023
11 Covid19criticalcare.com
12 World Council for Health Spike Protein Detox Guide November 30, 2021
13 Molecular Neurobiology March 2022; 59(3): 1850-1861


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2bz1ci/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

TRUMP STILL SUPPORTS COVID “VACCINES” & IGNORES ADVERSE REACTIONS & DEATHS
June 26, 2023
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/tru...ctions-deaths/

"Trump says he’s going to obliterate the Deep State – but what could be more Deep State than the genocidal $7 trillion money-laundering operation that was/is the entire COVID sh!tshow?

Dr Jane is stoic as she delivers a Black Pill, as a longtime Trump supporter who worked in his administration. She runs a part of Bret Baier’s recent interview with Donald Trump, in which the two discuss the vaxx and it’s devastating to watch Trump’s chaotic and frankly, stupid attempts to deflect Baier’s questions.

Her analysis of his tactics and his word choice is spot-on and very, very sad, considering that she has firsthand knowledge that Trump has been fully briefed about the death and destruction that has been and is still being wrought by the jabs.

Why, oh why is Trump covering for the vaxx and still claiming that he “saved 100 million lives” with Operation Warp Speed? It’s a complete slap in the face to his base.

He’s already being endlessly attacked by the Liberal World Order and facing centuries of jailtime over conjured nonsense, why is he unable to tell the truth about the vaxx?

The Federalist, a strongly Trump-supporting publication is asking the same question:

It remains unclear what data Trump is relying on to claim Covid shots saved 100 million lives — a contention the former president has made several times before…

Holding Big Pharma and public health officials accountable for their vaccine falsehoods is a must. And Trump’s sizable influence among Republican voters could be instrumental in achieving it. Trump’s acknowledgment of the issue and a potential conservative response could give Republican politicos the push they need to investigate and punish these entities where appropriate."


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2tvodu/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

EVIDENCE PROVES SURVIVORS OF EU PFIZER JAB TOOK PLACEBOS
6/30/23
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cov...took-placebos/

"A Danish study linking vaxx injuries and deaths in the EU to specific batches and lots has revealed a similar pattern to what was seen in the US. https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/evi...es-of-vaccine/

All of the jab-related deaths in Europe were attributable to 4.2% of the batches (5% in the US). Also, the deadly batches were deployed in specific regions where depopulation was apparently desired, as was also seen in the US.

In the US, Red States like Kentucky saw a 1,900% worse vaccination death rate than Democrat-controlled California, suggesting the Republican state received 20 times the amount of deadly batches of COVID-19 vaccine than the Blue State.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cdc...to-red-states/

Alex Jones walks us through the details of the Danish study, the details of which were published by Robert F Kennedy Jr’s Children’s Health Defense yesterday in the article reproduced below.

‘Bombshell’ Study of Pfizer COVID Vaccine Suggests Some People Got Highly Dangerous Shots, Others Got a Placebo

'Danish scientists uncovered compelling evidence that a significant percentage of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine distributed in the EU likely consisted of placebos — and the non-placebo batches demonstrated higher-than-normal severe adverse events in recipients, prompting the researchers to call for further investigation.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/a...vradakis-ph-d/

Danish scientists uncovered compelling evidence that a significant percentage of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine distributed in the EU likely consisted of placebos — and the non-placebo batches demonstrated higher-than-normal severe adverse events in recipients.

The scientists published their study in March, as a letter submitted to the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. BNT162b2 is the vaccine granted Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other authorities.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998

The study initially did not attract attention, but recent media reports brought it to light.

Journalist Kim Iversen, who on Wednesday reported on the study on The Kim Iversen Show, called it an “absolute bombshell of a story.”

(Continued in next post)

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2uhmpl/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

Continued from post above. (It had to be done this way since only one Rumble video can be embedded in a single post.)

"Iversen cited as her source an article in The Daily Sceptic, also published Wednesday, by five German scientists who have publicly questioned the safety of the vaccines.
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/28/...ay-scientists/

The Danish researchers looked at Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines administered in Denmark between December 2020 and January 2022 and found that batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine could neatly be divided into three groups.

Two of the three groups demonstrated higher-than-normal percentages of severe adverse events in recipients. However, for the third group of batches, a total of zero adverse events were reported.

The researchers also examined data indicating which batches were inspected and tested by regulators and discovered that almost none of the batches from the third group — associated with no severe adverse events — had been inspected.

According to Iversen, the findings suggest that “many of the batches of the Pfizer vaccine administered to the public — up to 30% — were placebos. And even worse, the evidence points to regulators knowing about it and willingly administering them.”

The study’s authors wrote:

“The observed variation in SAE [severe adverse event] rates and seriousness between BTN162b2 vaccine batches in this nationwide study was contrary to the expected homogenous rate and distribution of SAEs between batches.

“In conclusion, the results suggest the existence of a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 vaccine, and more studies are warranted to explore this preliminary observation and its consequences.”

Iversen said these results mean “either they were actively experimenting on the public or they were covering up for the fact that the vaccines came with numerous side effects.”

‘This is how placebos would look’

The German scientists first discussed the results of the Danish study last week on a German online talk show, Punkt.Preradovic, hosted by journalist Milena Preradovic.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=W0aIfkBSRNM

According to The Daily Sceptic, they analyzed how “the batches used in Denmark, which are represented by the points in the graph, essentially break down into three groups.”



One set of batches, referred to as the “green batches,” accounting for over 60% of the overall sample demonstrated “a moderate or moderately-high level of adverse events associated with them.”

Specifically, one severe adverse event was reported per approximately 400 doses in this batch — much higher than the rate of severe adverse events reported for the influenza vaccine.

Another set of batches, referred to as the “blue batches,” was “associated with an extraordinarily high level of adverse events” — with a rate of reported severe adverse events of 1 in 10 doses, accounting for nearly 50% of the vaccine-related deaths in the sample.

Some batches within the “blue” group had an even higher rate of severe adverse events: up to 1 in every 6 doses.

However, the “blue batches” were administered the least in Denmark, representing less than 5% of the total number of doses in the sample. This led the scientists to note that “these especially bad batches may perhaps have been quietly pulled from the market by public health authorities.”

The third set of batches, referred to as the “yellow batches,” represented approximately 30% of the total number of doses administered in the sample, but were “associated with literally zero suspected adverse events.”

Gerald Dyker, Ph.D., professor of organic chemistry at Ruhr University in Bochum, Germany, and a member of the team of five German scientists calling attention to the Danish study, suggested that “malicious” observers might conclude “this is how placebos would look.” https://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/oc2/dyker/

“Why would a certain group have absolutely no side effects?” Iversen said. “These scientists said the only time you get that is in the control group. That’s the group that was given the placebo.”

‘The regulators knew’

The Daily Sceptic reported that when the German researchers compared the batch numbers with publicly available data on the vaccine batches, “They made the startling discovery that almost none of the harmless batches, unlike the very-bad and not-so-bad batches, appear to have been subject to any quality-control testing at all.”
https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadI...IsMyBatch.html

“What they uncovered through public information … was that some of them were tested and some of them were not,” Iversen said, noting that every single batch in the “blue” group and almost all batches in the “green” group were tested by regulators and were then “rolled out to the public.”

However, when it came to the “yellow” batches, Iversen said the researchers found that all but one were not tested by the regulator.

Dyker told Preradovic, “This would support the initial suspicion that they are maybe in fact something like placebos,” a point further emphasized by Iversen, who said:

“How could this possibly be? What are the chances that the group that got no side effects whatsoever, that looks like a placebo, that looks like saline solution, what are the chances that none of them would have been tested except one, when all the others were tested in the other groups, practically all of them? The chances are next to nothing.”

“Do you know what that showcases right there? That right there shows the regulators knew. They knew they didn’t need to test the saline solution. It would have been a waste of their time, so they didn’t.

“And they released it to the public, and that was 30% of the doses, and they were placebo and they knew they were placebo. That’s what that looks like.”

Observing that many more doses were given from the “blue” and “green” groups, Iversen suggested several possible reasons for this, including that the researchers believe when regulators saw the high percentage of severe adverse events in those two groups, “they quietly pulled” those batches from the market “without telling anybody.”

In reference to the “blue” group, which demonstrated an extraordinarily high percentage of severe adverse events, Iversen said, “It’s possible that this was a different formulation and they rolled it out there as they were experimenting on people.”

She said it could be that it was “an intentional batch and that they were experimenting on the people, giving them this extra dose of something that had something different in it,” she added, “because it looks like if they were giving people placebos, that they were experimenting on people.”

“The only other thing that’s possible is that they were covering up for the massive number of side effects,” Iversen said, adding that there was an “outrageous number of side effects, and the only way to mitigate it and to keep the public calm [was] to give them a placebo. That way, the overall rate of side effects will be way lower.”

Iversen noted that Denmark has a reporting system for severe adverse events similar to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the U.S.
https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

VAERS has historically been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/defau...eport-2011.pdf

She said that in such voluntary reporting systems, most people who experience adverse events never report their injuries. “You have to take that into consideration, because that actually skews the numbers lower than higher.”

Suggesting that “This maybe was going on pretty much everywhere the Pfizer vaccines were being administered,” Iversen called for an investigation to be launched in the U.S.:

“This obviously needs to be investigated, and we would like to see this investigated here in the United States as well.

“Were they doing this and where were they doing this? Did they notify people that they potentially were getting a placebo? … Were the people aware that they were in a clinical trial essentially? That’s what that is. That is a test, you are a test subject … and they were collecting data.

“This is criminal.”

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2uboo4/?pub=ijro7

[Kryztian]

Bump - this is quite a story!

It should upset not just us level headed conspiracy theorist, but our delusional normie friends who in 2021 were eagerly waiting for the precious dose of Pfizer, or Moderna, or whatever they could get into there system which would undoubtedly protect them from the dread Wuhan wet market virus. Imagine if they had known then that there was a 30% chance they were taking a placebo.

Posted by onawah (here)
EVIDENCE PROVES SURVIVORS OF EU PFIZER JAB TOOK PLACEBOS
6/30/23
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cov...took-placebos/

"A Danish study linking vaxx injuries and deaths in the EU to specific batches and lots has revealed a similar pattern to what was seen in the US. https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/evi...es-of-vaccine/

All of the jab-related deaths in Europe were attributable to 4.2% of the batches (5% in the US). Also, the deadly batches were deployed in specific regions where depopulation was apparently desired, as was also seen in the US.

In the US, Red States like Kentucky saw a 1,900% worse vaccination death rate than Democrat-controlled California, suggesting the Republican state received 20 times the amount of deadly batches of COVID-19 vaccine than the Blue State.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cdc...to-red-states/

Alex Jones walks us through the details of the Danish study, the details of which were published by Robert F Kennedy Jr’s Children’s Health Defense yesterday in the article reproduced below.

‘Bombshell’ Study of Pfizer COVID Vaccine Suggests Some People Got Highly Dangerous Shots, Others Got a Placebo

'Danish scientists uncovered compelling evidence that a significant percentage of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine distributed in the EU likely consisted of placebos — and the non-placebo batches demonstrated higher-than-normal severe adverse events in recipients, prompting the researchers to call for further investigation.

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/a...vradakis-ph-d/

Danish scientists uncovered compelling evidence that a significant percentage of the batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine distributed in the EU likely consisted of placebos — and the non-placebo batches demonstrated higher-than-normal severe adverse events in recipients.

The scientists published their study in March, as a letter submitted to the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. BNT162b2 is the vaccine granted Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other authorities.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998

The study initially did not attract attention, but recent media reports brought it to light.

Journalist Kim Iversen, who on Wednesday reported on the study on The Kim Iversen Show, called it an “absolute bombshell of a story.”

(Continued in next post)

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2uhmpl/?pub=ijro7

[mountain_jim]

https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-...-certificates/



CDC Altered Minnesota Death Certificates that List a Covid Vaccine as a Cause of Death

BY Aaron HertzbergAARON HERTZBERG JULY 3, 2023 GOVERNMENT, VACCINES 9 MINUTE READ

Someone (who needs to remain anonymous) was able to obtain the death certificates from Minnesota for all deaths that occurred from 2015 to the present, which presented the opportunity to see if the CDC is being entirely honest about the US death data. Unsurprisingly, the CDC is not.

As we shall document, the CDC is concealing references to a covid vaccine on Minnesota death certificates (that are exceedingly rare to begin with because of widespread medical establishment denialism of vaccine adverse side effects). In almost every death certificate that identifies a covid vaccine as a cause of death, the CDC committed data fraud by not assigning the ICD 10 code for vaccine side effects to the causes of death listed on the death certificate.

Background

When someone dies, there is a death certificate that is filled out for official/legal purposes. Death certificates contain a lot of information (some states include more than others), including the causes of death (CoD).

Causes of death refer to the medical conditions that ultimately played some role in the demise of the decedent. To qualify as a CoD, a condition only needs to contribute to the medical decline of the decedent in some way, but doesn’t have to be directly responsible for whatever ultimately killed the person. If someone had high blood pressure, and subsequently suffered a heart attack that led to cardiac arrest which killed them, all three conditions qualify as CoD. On the other hand, this unfortunate fellow’s ingrown toenail is not a cause of death, because it in no way contributed to their demise.

This is from the CDC’s own guidance explaining how to properly fill out CoD’s on a death certificate (you don’t need to understand the difference between Cause A, B, etc for this article):



The critical thing to keep in mind is that the person filling out the death certificate writes a text description of the CoD’s, but doesn’t assign the ICD 10 codes for the CoD’s.

That’s the CDC’s job.

ICD 10 Coding System for CoD’s
There is a fancy coding system that is used to classify the many thousands of medical conditions that can play a role in death known as the International Classification of Diseases. Every few years, it is updated/revised to keep up with new medical (or bureaucratic) developments, as new conditions are discovered and old conditions are reorganized or reclassified.

The current iteration of the ICD that was used for the deaths we’re looking at is the ICD 10 (that’s the 10th version). It is basically a hierarchical classification system:



There are codes for practically every random weird thing you can think of:



These are categories themselves – a code can go as 7 characters long:



Source

ICD 10 Codes for Covid Vaccine Side Effects
There are two ICD 10 codes for vaccine side effects that can be broadly used for the covid vaccines – T88.1 and Y59.0:

T88.1 – Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified.



Y59.0 – Viral vaccines



(There are other ICD 10 codes for various specific complications or side effects of vaccines, but the point remains that an ICD 10 code for vaccine side effects exists.)

CDC – Centers for Data Concealment
The CDC receives the death certificates from the various states and applies ICD 10 codes. This is primarily done with a secret algorithm, with a tiny percentage of cases adjudicated by CDC staff when the algorithm is unable to confidently assign an ICD code to the text description written on the actual death certificate (such as confounding spelling or a text description that does not make much sense). I confirmed this with a biostatistician who works for a DoH in a US state (I’m leaving out which one because I want to preserve my persona grata status). The individual who obtained the MN death certificates likewise confirmed with state officials that the ICD codes in their data were assigned by the CDC.

What a death certificate identifying a covid vaccine as a CoD *should* look like

There are three death certificates in the MN tranche that contain either T88.1 or Y59.0. One is for a flu vaccine reaction, and – surprisingly – the other two are for a covid vaccine.

Note – when used below:

UCoD (Underlying Cause of Death) refers to “the disease or injury that initiated the train of events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury.”

MCoD (Multiple Causes of Death) refers to “the immediate cause of death and all other intermediate and contributory conditions listed on the death certificate.” (everything else)



The first death certificate contains a covid vaccine ICD (below), and it looks like the CDC was trapped and could not avoid putting it on without fundamentally rewriting the death certificate, because the vaccine complication is unambiguously listed as the UCoD (this death certificate is saying the person was killed by a heart attack caused by the covid vaccine within minutes of injection):



The second death certificate the CDC deigned to assign a vaccine ICD (and not only one but *BOTH* vaccine ICD codes(!!)) feels like perhaps a rogue CDC employee was working that day and snuck it in:



In any event, as we can clearly see, both T88.1 and Y59.0 are indeed appropriate for when a covid vaccine is listed as a CoD. Thus the CDC cannot claim that there was no official ICD 10 code that could be used to designate covid vaccines (or any other excuse).

The FRAUD:

With that introduction, below are 7 death certificates from Minnesota that identify a covid vaccine as a cause of death where the CDC omitted the corresponding ICD 10 code identifying a vaccine side effect when the CDC assigned ICD codes to the death certificates.



The first fraudulently filled out death certificate offers a crucial detail highlighting not only the fraud but the naked double standards for assigning CoD’s.

This death certificate identifies both a covid vaccine and covid itself as contributory CoD’s (in the last row highlighted in yellow, vaccine underlined in green, covid in blue):

“covid vaccine second dose 10 hrs prior to death”
“history of covid infection in May 2020” (about 7-8 months prior to death)
Any remotely objective person would presume that if a condition that occurred 7 months prior without any clear link to the actual death still nevertheless meets the standard for being identified as a CoD, then surely a condition or event that occurred a mere TEN HOURS before death identified by the doctor filling out the death certificate merits inclusion as a CoD.

Yet, the CDC assigned U70.1 – “COVID-19, virus identified” – for covid, but neglected to assign T88.1 or Y59.0 for the covid vaccine.

A second point to highlight is that we see that anything mentioned as a CoD, even in the context of “history of” that had (presumably) been long resolved, is a legitimate CoD insofar as assigning an ICD 10 code and epidemiological data are concerned.



This decedent suffered a cardiac arrest that ultimately led to her death *ONE DAY* after being vaccinated.

(For the record, I am not bothered by the “though it’s not clear as to any mechanism for how the vaccine could have led to the cardiac arrest” line. This death occurred February 24, 2021 – well before there was any sort of public awareness about the multiple plausible mechanisms by which the vaccine could cause heart damage. So to me, whoever filled out the death certificate was a gutsy fellow willing to identify a covid vaccine on a death certificate that had his name on it.)

Fraudulent Death Certificate #3



This death certificate doesn’t merely identify a covid vaccine, it explains that the decedent “felt sick after the vaccine” and died 4 days later from a heart attack. Yet, no T88.1 or Y59.0.



This death certificate provides that the decedent received her second dose of Pfizer 18 days prior to her death.



Here we have a 65-year-old male who was killed by a heart attack 12 days after getting vaccinated.



This case is especially noteworthy. Someone involved with this death informed me that the family had to pressure the coroner to put the recent covid booster on the death certificate. A family member also filed a VAERS report themselves, after the patient’s doctors declined to do so.

Furthermore, the CDC applied W34 as the UCoD. What is W34 for?



‘accidental discharge and malfunction from other and unspecified firearms and guns.’

There is no mention of any firearms mishaps on the death certificate.

One would have to wonder how such an errant code came to be, especially on a death certificate that contains other ICD 10 shenanigans. It is unlikely that ‘Y590’ or ‘T881’ would be ‘misspelled’ or algorithmically mixed up with ‘W34.’



Perhaps if there were no other instances of fraudulent omittance of vaccine ICD codes on other death certificates, and the CDC wasn’t in the habit of routinely assigning U07.1 for a covid infection that resolved a year ago, the failure to include T88.1 or Y59.0 here could be excused.

At minimum, this death certificate should contain T88.0 – ‘Infection following immunization’ – to document the breakthrough infection (which is a subject for a separate article as this seems to be fairly widespread).

Additional Observations

The following table shows the date of death and age for all 9 death certificates shown above that identified a covid vaccine as a CoD:



It is striking that 7/9 died before May 2021. This is odd – if anything, the deaths should skew later, not earlier. Vaccine adverse events were denied – with maximum prejudice and then some – for many months before the medical mainstream has finally (begrudgingly) started to acknowledge that the covid vaccines can trigger potentially lethal pathologies (in exceedingly rare instances to be sure).

The clustering of death certificates mentioning a covid vaccine at the beginning of the rollout suggests that ‘administrative’ interference likely played a role in discouraging coroners from mentioning a covid vaccine on death certificates.

Another noteworthy tidbit here is the age of the decedents: every single one is a senior citizen, and the average age of the decedents is 80. This is important to highlight because whereas young people “dying suddenly” stands out, there has been much less attention or acknowledgement of the covid vaccine’s devastating toll upon the old and frail, where deaths – even those that occur in close proximity to vaccination – are readily attributed to prior health conditions.

Finally, the actions of the CDC call into question whether the CDC is altogether qualified or trustworthy enough to be the steward of the nation’s epidemiological data. The CDC manages many of the datasets that underpin whole fields of study. If the CDC is willing to fraudulently alter data (or even if the CDC is just too incompetent to avoid corrupting data), all data under the aegis of the CDC is potentially suspect, especially if it relates to a controversial political or social issue. The implications of this are disturbing, to say the least.

Author
Aaron Hertzberg
Aaron Hertzberg
Aaron Hertzberg is a writer on all aspects of the pandemic response. His Substack is called Resisting the Intellectual Illiteratti.

[onawah]

How FDA Spins Science on Cellphone Radiation and Human Health Risks
7/7/23
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20230707

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

"Despite a $30-million “gold standard” study demonstrating clear cancer risks from cellphone radiation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the telecom industry continue to spin the science and create doubt.

By
Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

"Editor’s note: This is the first in a three-part series examining key questions in the public debate on the safety of wireless radiation. Part I addresses the question, How did the FDA arrive at its position on cellphones and cancer?

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims there’s not enough scientific evidence to link cellphone use to health problems — but according to Devra Davis, Ph.D., MPH, a toxicologist and epidemiologist, the FDA’s claim is untrue and misleading.

Davis spoke with The Defender about the important backstory leading up to the FDA’s position on cellphone radiation as it relates to human health.

To support its statement — that “the weight of scientific evidence has not linked exposure to radio frequency energy from cell phone use with any health problems” — the FDA references a 2008-2018 literature review it conducted on radiofrequency (RF) radiation and cancer.

After completing the review, the FDA stated: “To date, there is no consistent or credible scientific evidence of health problems caused by the exposure to radio frequency energy emitted by cell phones.”

However, Davis said the FDA’s review was never signed. In other words, the names of the individuals who authored the report were never publicly released.

Davis has authored more than 200 peer-reviewed publications in books and journals, ranging from the Lancet to the Journal of the American Medical Association. She is the founding director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council at the National Academy of Sciences and the founder and president of Environmental Health Trust.

Davis, who worked as a scientific adviser under multiple presidential administrations said, “Normally, when you have a review at that high level it’s quite consequential and it’s always signed.”

“The reason it was unsigned, I believe,” Davis told The Defender, “is because no one in the FDA was willing to put their name behind such a piece of junk. It was absolute nonsense,” she said. “It ignored many publications and only relied on an incredibly skewed interpretation of the literature — and I’m being generous when I say it like that.”

Davis pointed out that the FDA issued the review shortly after the National Toxicology Program (NTP) completed its multi-year $30 million study on cellphone radiation.

In that study, NTP researchers concluded there was “clear evidence” that male rats exposed to high levels of RF like that used in 2G and 3G cellphones developed cancerous heart tumors, and “some evidence” of tumors in the brain and adrenal gland of exposed male rats.

The NTP for decades has been the premier governmental testing program for pharmaceuticals, chemicals and radiation, said Davis, who served on the board of scientific counselors for the NTP when it was first started in the 1980s.

‘Gold Standard’ NTP study findings suppressed

Davis told The Defender that the government had access to a “gold standard program testing with positive results” that were consistent with and corroborated dozens of other studies. “It wasn’t like it [the NTP study] was a one-off study,” she said.

Once the word got out that the findings of the NTP study were positive — meaning the government researchers had found an association between cellphone radiation and the growth of cancerous tumors — the telecommunication industry “started its tactics” to suppress the findings, Davis said.

Davis has been researching such tactics for more than a decade. This fall she plans to release a new edition of her 2010 book, “Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What the Industry Is Doing to Hide It, and How to Protect Your Family.”

Instead of the NTP study report being released in 2016 when it was first ready, she said, the telecom industry exerted pressure to subject the study’s conclusions to an unprecedented level of scrutiny.

“When the first drafts began to circulate internally, it was elevated for a peer review unlike any that has ever been conducted in the history of the entire program — and I can say that with great certainty. No other compound or substance [studied by the NTP] has ever been subject to this level of peer review,” Davis said.

A panel of external scientific experts convened for a three-day review of the study and its conclusions in March 2018.

However, rather than downplaying the study’s conclusions, the experts concluded that the scientific evidence in the study was so strong that they recommended the NTP reclassify some of its conclusions from “some evidence” to “clear evidence” of carcinogenic activity.

Davis — who attended the three-day review — said, “The reviewers that had been picked were people who were top-of-the-game toxicologists from Proctor and Gamble, from [Nokia] Bell Labs. [They were] industry toxicologists, but they were straight-up people.”

Davis said many of the experts spoke with her privately. “The woman from Proctor and Gamble was concerned about her kids. She said, ‘This [cellphone radiation] is not appropriate.’ I said, ‘Yes, that’s what we’ve been trying to say for some time.’”

More than 250 scientists — who together have published over 2,000 papers and letters on the biologic and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMFs) produced by wireless devices, including cellphones — signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for health warnings and stronger exposure limits.

FDA rejects study it solicited, ‘spins’ it as faulty

When the experts’ review of the NTP study was released, the FDA — which in 1999 requested the study and reviewed all its protocols, interim reports and final reports — the agency in November 2018, repudiated the study and in February 2020, released the unsigned literature review that criticized the study.

“They [the FDA] suddenly said, ‘Well, the exposure chambers [used in the study] are not relevant to humans. The [radiation] levels were too high,’” Davis said. “They were not.”

Davis was not alone in disagreeing with the FDA’s rejection of the NTP study. More than 20 scientists, including Davis, wrote a letter calling on the FDA to retract the literature review. Many scientists individually wrote to the FDA as well.

Moreover, the Environmental Health Trust wrote a 188-page report on the FDA’s inaccuracies in its research review and safety determinations about cellphone radiation.

Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the University of California, Berkeley, who has researched cellphone radiation for over a decade, identified nine “biased statements” made about the NTP study that “tend to create doubt about data quality and implications.”

In “SPIN vs FACT: National Toxicology Program report on cancer risk from cellphone radiation,” Moskowitz lists and counters each statement. For example, Moskowitz noted that the claim the study’s conclusions were faulty was rebutted by the study report itself.

Moskowitz also pointed out that Christopher Portier, Ph.D., a retired head of the NTP who helped launch the study and still sometimes works for the federal government as a consultant scientist, told Scientific American, “This is by far — far and away — the most carefully done cell phone bioassay, a biological assessment.”

How telecom industry war-gamed study’s results to manufacture doubt

According to Davis, the telecom industry has for decades influenced governmental agencies such as the FDA to “manufacture doubt” about scientific studies — such as the NTP study — that do not benefit it.

She pointed out that in the early 1990s, Motorola launched a “disinformation campaign to confuse the public.” According to the Environmental Health Trust:

“When first reports that cell phone radiation could damage DNA emerged from the laboratory of Henry Lai and N.P. Singh [both researchers at the University of Washington, Seattle] in the 90’s, a memo written by Motorola to their media advisors in 1994 announced the clear strategy that remains alive and well: war-game the science.”

The “wargame” memo — first released by Microwave News (see page 13) — showed that Norman Sandler of Motorola’s corporate communications department on Dec. 13, 1994, wrote to Michael Kehs of the Burson-Marsteller public relations firm in Washington to plan how Motorola would respond to Lai and Singh’s findings.

Sandler and Kehs had a three-point plan to impede further scientific research on how cellphone radiation might cause DNA damage and to create public doubt in such studies. The plan involved:

Delaying — or halting — Lai and Singh from continuing their DNA research.
Preventing other scientists from replicating the study, or carefully selecting scientists who would.
Convincing the press and the public using industry-selected scientists that the Lai-Singh DNA study results were of marginal importance and with questionable relevance in regard to the question of whether cellphones are safe for humans.
“I think we have sufficiently war-gamed the Lai-Singh issue, assuming SAG [the Scientific Advisory Group] and CTIA [the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association] have done their homework,” Sandler said.

Sandler said Motorola’s executive vice president was “adamant” that the industry come up with a “forceful one- or two-sentence portion of our standby statement that puts a damper on speculation arising from this research.”

Sandler proposed the industry say:

“While this work raises some interesting questions about possible biological effects, it is our understanding that there are too many uncertainties — related to the methodology employed, the findings that have been reported and the science that underlies them — to draw any conclusions about its significance at this time.”

“That exact message,” Davis said, “keeps getting repeated and is well-funded to create doubts.”

She added:

“The [telecom] industry has been very effective in their war games against science and scientists. We have to do a better job of clarifying the science and countering misleading and selective data from industry.”

Next in this series: What’s behind the 5G rollout? "

(You can subscribe to Children's Health Defense newsletter here: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/sign-up/
It was started by RFKennedy Jr. who unlike most politicians, tells the truth about many important issues like the dangers of microwaves, vaccines, and government corruption. )

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KgldG9r-i9M

-Jul 6, 2023
Vaccine batches with different adverse reaction reports.

Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...

71% of the suspected adverse reactions occurred in 4.2% of the vaccine batches

[Gwin Ru]

...

... The Confidential Pfizer Report released as part of a Freedom of Information request is a bombshell. The vaccine was launched in mid-December 2020. By the end of February 2021, “Pfizer had already received more than 1,200 reports of deaths allegedly caused by the vaccine and tens of thousands of reported adverse events, including 23 cases of spontaneous abortions out of 270 pregnancies and more than 2,000 reports of cardiac disorders.”

This Confidential Pfizer Report provides data on deaths and adverse events recorded by Pfizer from the outset of the vaccine project in December 2020 to the end of February 2021, namely a very short period (at most two and a half months).

by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky

The data from mid-December 2020 to the end of February 2021 unequivocally confirms “Manslaughter”. Based on the evidence, Pfizer had the responsibility to immediately cancel and withdraw the “vaccine”.

Pfizer’s Worldwide marketing of the Covid-19 Vaccine beyond February 28th, 2021, is no longer an “Act of Manslaughter”.

Murder as opposed to Manslaughter implies “Criminal Intent”.

Pfizer’s Covid 19 Vaccine constitutes a Criminal Act. From a legal standpoint it is an “Act of Murder” applied Worldwide to a target population of 8 billion people.

What is contained in Pfizer’s “confidential” report is detailed evidence on the impacts of the “vaccine” on mortality and morbidity. This data which emanates from the “Horse’s Mouth” can now be used to confront as well as formulate legal procedures against Big Pharma, the governments, the WHO and the media.

Contributed by Alexandra Bruce Contact

Source: https://odysee.com/$/embed/@lestu-dio:d/chossudovsky16052022:e

[onawah]

Why Pfizer Stopped COVID Vax Trial
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
July 11, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1852485174

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...-trial-pdf.pdf

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In February 2021, Pfizer launched a randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind study to evaluate the safety of its COVID-19 shot — BNT162b2 — in healthy pregnant women
The injections were set to take place between 24 and 34 weeks’ gestation, with participants randomized 1-to-1 to receive a COVID-19 shot or placebo
The study was initially set to enroll 4,000 women, but Pfizer only signed up 349, then stopped enrollment entirely
The CDC’s widespread endorsement of COVID-19 shots for pregnant women before the study was completed may have negated the need for the trial
Pfizer stated that because so many pregnant women had already gone ahead and gotten the shot, due to the government’s endorsement, enrollment dropped and there was no reason to move ahead with the study

No randomized trial data are available for use of the COVID-19 shot in pregnant women, and Pfizer cut its pregnancy trial short.1 But this doesn’t stop the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from recommending COVID-19 injections for everyone 6 months and older, including “people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or those who might become pregnant in the future.”2

“Not having any good data didn’t seem to bother the CDC,” Dr. Martin Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, wrote in Tablet.3 He and a team of scientists petitioned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to add a disclaimer to the shot’s label about the lack of trial data on its safety in pregnant women. The FDA declined, stating that this information wouldn’t be relevant.

Pregnant women, however, do need to know about the shot’s lack of testing during pregnancy — it’s the foundation of informed consent. They’d also likely be interested to know why Pfizer stopped its pregnancy trial early and has yet to make the results it did find public.

Pfizer Stopped COVID Jab Pregnancy Trial, Withholds Data
In February 2021, Pfizer launched a randomized, placebo-controlled, observer-blind study to evaluate the safety of its COVID-19 shot — BNT162b2 — in healthy pregnant women. The injections were set to take place between 24 and 34 weeks’ gestation, with participants randomized 1-to-1 to receive a COVID-19 shot or placebo.4 But while the study was initially set to enroll 4,000 women,5 Pfizer only signed up 349, then stopped enrollment entirely.6

“Most concerning,” Makary explained, “the pregnancy outcomes of those who participated in the trial, and their babies, are still not public today, nearly two years later.”7 Pregnant and breastfeeding women were excluded from Pfizer’s and Moderna’s phase III clinical trials,8 but in April 2021, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky announced, "CDC recommends that pregnant people receive the COVID-19 vaccine."9

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) soon echoed this statement, recommending pregnant women get injected, as did the UK’s Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.10

So, as the months passed, hundreds of thousands of pregnant women globally rolled up their sleeves to receive the vaccine, despite the absence of any clinical trials. “The message from authorities was clear — the harm from COVID-19 infection outweighed any harms from the mRNA vaccine — but in truth, they couldn’t possibly have known,” noted Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., a former medical scientist with the University of Adelaide and former reporter for ABC News in Australia.11

Animal Studies Show Fetal Loss, Skeletal Variations
Pfizer’s product labeling suggested, “No vaccine-related adverse effects on female fertility, fetal development or postnatal development were reported.” But, Demasi reported, a freedom of information request from 2021 showed this was based on an animal study of just 44 rats, which showed concerning findings about fetal loss:12

“The study found the vaccine led to a statistically significant doubling in fetal loss (9.77% mRNA vs 4.09% saline), but Pfizer concluded that the difference between the two groups was “not biologically meaningful.”

The label also states that Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine was not tested for its potential to cause carcinogenicity (ability to cause cancer), genotoxicity (ability to damage genetic information), or impairment of male fertility.”

An animal study conducted by Moderna also showed a significant number of rats were born with skeletal variations after their mothers were injected with the COVID-19 shot while pregnant. But, according to Demasi, “Moderna concluded that the “Skeletal variations are structural changes that do not impact development or function of a developing embryo” and therefore “not considered adverse.”

Trial Stopped Because Many Pregnant Women Already Injected
Pfizer hasn’t publicly explained why its trial on pregnant women was stopped short, nor why the resulting data hasn’t been published. It’s possible they ended the trial because of unfavorable results. It wouldn’t be the first time.

However, in this case it appears the CDC’s widespread endorsement of COVID-19 shots for pregnant women — before the study was completed — may have negated the need for the trial altogether, at least from Pfizer’s perspective. As Makary put it:13

“In the case of the COVID vaccine trial in pregnant women, the trial may have been terminated not because the results were unfavorable, but because no data was needed. The medical and public health establishments had already made up their minds, declaring it safe and effective regardless of what the data was going to show. Why evaluate a product if the CDC and ACOG are already sold on the product?”

Demasi agreed. In fact, she published an email from Pfizer, in which the company admitted that enrollment for their trial significantly declined in the end of 2021, because health officials had already given the shot their seal of approval. Because so many pregnant women had already gone ahead and gotten the shot, due to the government’s endorsement, there was no reason to move ahead with the study. Demasi published Pfizer’s email response, which reads:14

“In the fourth quarter of 2021, enrollment was stopped in C4591015 Study (a Phase 2/3 placebo controlled randomized observer-blind study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 against COVID-19 in healthy pregnant women 18 years of age and older). This study was developed prior to availability or recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women.

The environment changed during 2021 and by September 2021, COVID-19 vaccines were recommended by applicable recommending bodies (e.g., ACIP in the U.S.) for pregnant women in all participating/planned countries, and as a result the enrollment rate declined significantly.

With the declining enrollment, the study had insufficient sample size to assess the primary immunogenicity objective and continuation of this placebo controlled study could no longer be justified due to global recommendations. This proposal was shared with and agreed to by FDA and EMA.”

As for the lack of published data, Pfizer stated it doesn’t have it:15

“Pfizer does not yet have a complete data set from the maternal immunization study, C4591015. Pfizer and BioNTech plan to complete the analysis of the clinical trial C4591015 and share it with global public health regulators and seek publication or presentation as is our standard practice.

It is important to note that relevant real-world evidence on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women has been presented and published numerous times by various parties in multiple journals and forums.”

Natural Immunity Is Still Being Ignored
Not only does ACOG “strongly recommend” that pregnant women get a COVID-19 shot, but they also recommend a booster dose.16 “Vaccination may occur in any trimester, and emphasis should be on vaccine receipt as soon as possible to maximize maternal and fetal health. This recommendation applies to both primary series and booster vaccination,” ACOG states.17

But missing from their information is data about natural immunity. Research by Makary and colleagues, published in JAMA,18 showed that natural immunity to COVID-19 — achieved by prior infection, not an injection — was durable for about two years, suggesting it’s longer lasting than any protection gained from a COVID-19 shot.19

A systematic review and meta-analysis published in The Lancet20 also revealed natural immunity to be at least as effective as, and likely superior to, COVID-19 injections.21 Health officials don’t have the data from Pfizer’s randomized trial of the shots in pregnant women. But rather than erring on the side of caution — especially for those with natural immunity — they’re still recommending everyone get the shots.

Scientists Warn Pregnant Women Not to Receive COVID Shots
Not everyone’s onboard with health agencies’ push for pregnant women to get injected. “The pushing of these experimental COVID-19 vaccines globally is the greatest violation of medical ethics in the history of medicine, maybe humanity,” Dr. James Thorp, a maternal fetal medicine expert, told Tucker Carlson.22

Thorp and colleagues published a preprint study that found striking risks to pregnant women who received the shots, along with their unborn babies.23 The outcomes were so dire that the researchers concluded pregnant women should not receive COVID-19 shots until further research is completed.

“A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring,” they explained.24 Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots were associated with a significant increase in adverse events (AE), including:25

Menstrual abnormality

Miscarriage

Fetal chromosomal abnormalities

Fetal malformation

Fetal cystic hygroma

Fetal cardiac disorders

Fetal arrhythmia

Fetal cardiac arrest

Fetal vascular mal-perfusion

Fetal growth abnormalities

Fetal abnormal surveillance

Fetal placental thrombosis

Low amniotic fluid

Fetal death/stillbirth

The data also revealed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and a more than twofold increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes across six different categories, according to board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.26

NIH Study Confirms Menstrual Changes Post-Jabs
Delayed menstruation has also been confirmed following COVID-19 shots, according to a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology — funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Research on Women's Health.27

The study involved 3,959 individuals between the ages of 18 and 45 years. Those who had not received a COVID-19 shot noted no significant changes in cycle four during the study compared to their first three cycles. But those who received COVID-19 shots had longer menstrual cycles, typically by less than one day, when they received the shots.

The European Union, meanwhile, has recommended that “heavy menstrual bleeding” be added as a side effect to mRNA COVID-19 shots.28 Makary noted:29

“Here in the U.S. there’s been no such update to product labeling. This lack of humility was also evident when healthy young women were told with incredible absolutism that the COVID vaccine cannot affect fertility. The right answer should have been: We don’t think it will affect fertility but we don’t have any good data on the question.”

Officials Choose ‘Stern Paternalism’ Over Informed Consent
In the absence of data for a vulnerable population — pregnant and breastfeeding women — health officials should have urged caution. As the effectiveness of natural immunity became clear, people should have been informed of this and warned of potential risks from COVID-19 shots. This way, they could make an informed decision before consenting to an injection that could have serious reproductive effects.

The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) felt the data were compelling enough in 2021 to withdraw the shots for vulnerable populations like pregnant women,30,31 but health officials chose, instead, to make them guinea pigs for an untested, experimental shot.

“In the absence of good data, organized medicine chose the path of stern paternalism. But in my experience as a physician, it’s far better to properly inform a patient rather than steamroll their questions,” said.32 If and when Pfizer does release the data, it’s possible that health agencies will have some explaining to do if the data aren’t favorable. Makary continued:33

“It may be that Pfizer’s pregnancy trial would have been favorable to the vaccine, showing that the benefits outweigh harms, but Pfizer has not released the data. Perhaps the data was not favorable, or perhaps Pfizer realized they had convinced the medical establishment without data, so why run the risk of sharing what a placebo-controlled trial shows?" ”

- Sources and References
1, 5, 6, 7, 21, 29, 32, 33 Tablet June 21, 2023
2, 3, 13 U.S. CDC, COVID-19 Vaccines While Pregnant or Breastfeeding October 20, 2022
4 ClinicalTrials.gov, To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Against COVID-19 in Healthy Pregnant Women 18 Years [...]
8, 10, 11 Substack, Maryanne Demasi reports February 23, 2023
9 CBS News April 27, 2021
12, 14, 15 Substack, Alexander COVID News February 25, 2023
16, 17 ACOG, COVID-19 Vaccines and Pregnancy: Conversation Guide
18 JAMA. 2022;327(11):1085-1087. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1393
19 Twitter, Marty Makary February 3, 2022
20 The Lancet March 11, 2023
22 Rumble February 27, 2023, 1:00
23, 24, 25 Preprints 2022, 2022090430
26 Substack, Courageous Discourse March 2, 2023
27 Obstetrics & Gynecology: January 5, 2022 - Volume - Issue - 10.1097
28 European Medicines Agency October 28, 2022
30, 31 Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law Volume 4:130-143 November 2021