Vaccine Crimes

[jaybee]

.

....continuing the conversation that's on the last page...


While respecting all differing opinions about the main characters and commentators on the Covid Farce and the Jabs...

I am inclined to think that Robert Malone is OK and on our side...

I'm more suspicious about Brian Ardis... who grins like a Cheshire Cat while talking about the most serious of matters - and seems very pleased with himself - crashing on to the 'scene' a while back with the venom thing -
then there's Jane Ruby... who seems a bit too glamorous to me... not that I'm saying she should dress in tweeds and flat shoes, with no make up... to be taken seriously but I'm just getting a 'bit too vain' vibe..

Haven't seen much of George Webb to comment about him...

Karen Kingston - I think she is probably (almost certainly) the real deal - but has had her mind twisted to pieces and has been scared to death behind the scenes, by others (like Ardis and Ruby - and Webb... and others maybe...??)....I feel that Stew Peters is genuine but has been encouraged to distrust Malone by others who could be Alphabet Agency Plants...

It all gets a bit complicated doesn't it.... bit muddy.... one thing for definite though, there are 100% sure going to be plants on the scene - (whoever they are) trying to direct the narrative and cause mischief...

[mountain_jim]

I prefer to stick to the data for the most part - which continues to prove the crimes and go unreported by the MSM.

https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/stat...462676480?s=20

from link

https://vigilantnews.com/post/bombsh...or-of-medicine

Bombshell: 98% of Adverse Events Are NOT Being Reported in the UK, According to Top Professor of Medicine
By
The Vigilant Fox
Retired nurse educator Dr. John Campbell dropped yet another explosive video on his Youtube channel Saturday. He shared how the Pandemic Response and Recovery Group, a bipartisan parliamentary group in the United Kingdom, raised concerns about the country's approach to vaccine safety. Notably, evidence suggests that a staggering 98% of adverse reactions to vaccines may not be reported.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kGmOLkmfWIU

At the center of this controversy lies the UK's Yellow Card System, a mechanism to report adverse reactions. Though originally paper-based (hence the name "yellow card"), this system has since gone digital. Nonetheless, its efficacy is now under scrutiny.

According to Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, as little as only 2% of adverse reactions are being reported through this system, rendering it basically useless.



< more at link >

https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/sta...763660800?s=20

< not sure why tweet not fully showing >

full image





https://twitter.com/VigilantFox/stat...548878336?s=20

[onawah]

Q-Dots in blood suddenly from some source
8/13/23
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/cp/136005564

"Q-Dots in blood suddenly from some source.
A recent view of my blood which i have mostly been keeping clean until now apparently.

KARL.C
AUG 12, 2023
CROSS-POST FROM KARL.C’S SUBSTACK
'Dr. David Nixon cross posted this substack, which I also found interesting. These are structures that I have seen in the blood as well. I believe it is important to show that the blood findings are seen around the world. I look forward to sharing Dr. Nixons substack on his findings from Australia soon. - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD'



I do all the detoxing, avoid the bad foods, drink the filtered water, etc. I felt very strange recently and that is when i decided to do a routine check-up. To my surprise the blood looked worse than at any other point than i have seen before. The spicules are insanely stacked in some images, gels are present, fibers growing big and long. The colored dots are everywhere and in another post i will show you them forming as the blood settles."


Much more here:https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/cp/136005564

[Icare]

SHOCKING NEW VAX DATA! - CDC Data Shows Over 118,000 Children Died Suddenly After Injections! (and these are just the figures for the United States alone)
From August 15, 2023

[onawah]

Pfizer Is Hiding How COVID Jab Damages the Heart
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
August 15, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1883734629

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...-heart-pdf.pdf

(Rumble video is embedded at the end of this post.)

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
August 3, 2023, the Australian Senate held a COVID hearing. Sen. Gerard Rennick asked Dr. Krishan Thiru, Pfizer’s Australian medical director, to explain the mechanism of how the mRNA COVID shot causes myocarditis. Thiru, however, kept talking in circles rather than answering the question
Either Pfizer has no idea how the shot damages the heart, which raises serious questions about the company’s scientific qualifications, or they do know but refuse to admit it, for fear of liability
Pfizer appears to have sponsored campaigns to push for the jab to be mandated, at least in the U.S., thereby maximizing the potential damage along with profits
According to Marc Girardot, the bolus theory can explain how and why the mRNA COVID shots damage the heart and other organs
Several other theories and hypotheses have also been proposed, including molecular mimicry, immune response to mRNA, dysregulated cytokine expression, ACE2 suppression, endothelial damage, lipid nanoparticles triggering syncytia formation and impeding the electrical conduction of the heart, and more

August 3, 2023, the Australian Senate Education and Employment Committee1 held a COVID hearing in which Sen. Gerard Rennick asked Dr. Krishan Thiru, Pfizer’s Australian medical director, to explain the mechanism of how the mRNA COVID shot causes myocarditis.2

Thiru, however, kept talking in circles rather than answering the question. Rennick valiantly tried, without success, to redirect him back to the question at hand, which was: Does Pfizer understand how the shot is causing damage to the heart?

How are you calling it safe without understanding the risk? ~ Sen. Gerard Rennick
The take-home here is that either a) Pfizer has no idea how the shot damages the heart, which raises serious questions about the company’s scientific qualifications or b) they do know but refuse to admit it, because if they do, it creates liability. As noted by Rennick, how can Pfizer say the shot is safe if they don’t understand the risk?

Pfizer Sponsored Groups Calling for Jab Mandates

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bnJWToe_w2g

Pfizer has not only insisted its COVID jab is safe and effective, and that side effects like myocarditis are vanishingly rare (despite athletes and young people dropping from heart problems at rates never seen before), the company also appears to have sponsored campaigns to push for the jab to be mandated, at least in the U.S., thereby maximizing the potential damage along with profits.

According to investigative reporter Lee Fang,3 Pfizer financed a long list of U.S. groups that lobbied for COVID jab mandates, including consumer groups, medical groups, public health organizations as and civil rights organizations. In the video above, UnHerd reporter Florence Read interviews Fang about his findings. Notable recipients of Pfizer funding just prior to or during the jab rollout included:4

The Chicago Urban League, which accepted a $100,000 donation from Pfizer to promote "vaccine safety and effectiveness." Unlike other corporate donations, this one was not publicly disclosed on the League’s website.

The National Consumers League, which received $75,000 from Pfizer earmarked for "vaccine policy efforts." As noted by Fang, Andrea LaRue, an NCL board member, also happens to be a "highly paid contract lobbyist to Pfizer, focused on vaccine policy," and this conflict of interest also was not disclosed.

The Immunization Partnership, which received, but did not disclose, a $35,000 donation from Pfizer for "legislative advocacy" in 2021, the same year they lobbied against Texas legislation to prevent vaccine passports and vaccine mandates for municipal workers.

The American Pharmacists Association, American College of Preventive Medicine, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American College of Emergency Physicians, all of which signed a letter5 in support of Biden’s unconstitutional jab mandate for employers with 100 or more employees, after receiving grants from Pfizer.

The National Hispanic Medical Association, which worked with a public relations firm to distribute "press release and media placements" that "called on employers of essential workers to mandate COVID-19 vaccines." They also lobbied in favor of Biden’s vaccine mandate — all after receiving $30,000 from BIO, a vaccine industry lobby group that represents Pfizer and Moderna.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, which received several specialized grants from Pfizer in 2021. State chapters also received Pfizer grants earmarked for vaccine policy lobbying efforts.

Who Are These Institutions Working For?
As reported by UnHerd:6

"This is not the first time Pfizer has promoted its drugs to high-profile institutions. In 2009, the organization was prosecuted by the U.S. Justice Department for ‘engaging in illegal off-label promotion of their drugs’ and ‘encouraging doctors to prescribe the drugs where there was no kind of regulatory authority.’

According to Fang, these donations undermine trust in such institutions: ‘Are they acting as a representative of the community? Or are they acting as corporate lobbyists, as organizations acting in the interests of their donors?’"

Indeed, as attorney Jenin Younes told Fang, "If people or institutions advocated for or implemented mandates, while failing to disclose ties to the vaccine companies, that is a serious ethical violation, and potentially even unlawful, and should be thoroughly investigated."7How the COVID Jab Can Damage Your Heart
As for how Pfizer’s mRNA COVID jab can damage your heart, several scientists have thrown their 2 cents into the discussion. One of them is Marc Girardot, a member of Pandemics Data & Analysis (PANDA8), a "multidisciplinary, sense-making group of global experts who encourage good science, rational debate and sound public policy, with the aim of empowering people to make informed decisions" about COVID-19.

On his Substack,9 Girardot features a long list of articles "debunking the COVID narrative with observations, facts, data and rigorous scientific method." In a June 5, 2023, article,10 he focused on the bolus theory, which can help explain how and why the mRNA jabs can trigger myocarditis and other cardiovascular problems. Girardot writes:11

"For those who are new, a good analogy for a Bolus is a ‘Swarm of particles,’ a particularly dense group of particles circulating through the vascular system and carpet-bombing the blood cells linings before being diluted into the blood ...

The map right below attempts to explain the variety of ways a bolus of vaccine particles can harm the body (read the Endothelium) via varying journeys down the vascular system in the first minute post-injection."



For clarification, what Girardot is really talking about is when a vaccine is accidentally injected straight into the bloodstream. Normally, you’re supposed to pull back on the plunger to make sure you’re not hitting a blood vessel before you inject a vaccine. This is known as aspiration.

In the case of the COVID jabs, health authorities instructed vaccine administrators to skip this step. Back in January 2023, Bret Weinstein of the DarkHorse podcast briefly brought up Girardot’s bolus theory on the Joe Rogan Show (video below).12

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VpjiK2zJOh4

Myocarditis Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg
Girardot points out that vaccine injuries will "always" involve several locations, not just a single organ like the heart. The reason someone might "only" experience myocarditis is because:

"Some areas might regenerate; other deleterious harm might be corrected for by the immune system ... In some areas like in the bone marrow, it will likely be very transient as endothelial stem cells are abundant and can repair it very quickly. But there is no such thing as a Bolus hitting only the heart ... at a minimum the vasculature will be damaged and coronary disease might happen."

In an August 5, 2023, tweet, Girardot argued that the bolus theory is "the very mechanism of action of any transfecting vaccine."13

"Protein production is accompanied by antigen presentation on MHCs [major histocompatibility complexes] and indeed, as testified in all autopsies and biopsies, all adverse events are T-cell mediated," he writes, adding that most transfection occurs in the endothelium, not organ tissue, and endothelium permeabilization appears to be "a root cause of so many illnesses, it’s unbelievable."

So, according to Girardot, "myocarditis is the tip of the iceberg." Other predictable effects include neurodegenerative diseases, neuropathies, the hyper-production of hormones, tinnitus, arthritis, sterility and more.

Hypotheses Cited by Vaccine Pusher
Another theory for how the COVID jabs can cause myocarditis has been presented by none other than Dr. Peter Hotez, a vaccine pusher if there ever was one.

In July 2021, he published a paper14 in the journal Circulation, citing the hypothesis that molecular mimicry between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and self-antigens might trigger "preexisting dysregulated immune pathways in certain individuals, immune response to mRNA, and activation of immunologic pathways, and dysregulated cytokine expression."

"The reasons for male predominance in myocarditis cases are unknown, but possible explanations relate to sex hormone differences in immune response and myocarditis, and also underdiagnosis of cardiac disease in women," he noted.

Other Mechanisms of Harm
Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., also has detailed mechanisms of action that can explain how the COVID shots damage the heart. For example, back in 2021, she pointed out that the spike protein that your body produces in response to the COVID-19 shot suppresses ACE2, which can trigger problems such as pulmonary hypertension, ventricular heart failure and stroke.15,16 But that’s not all.

In May 2021, Seneff co-wrote a paper17 titled "Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19," published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. In it, she describes the spike protein as a metabolic poison with wide-ranging effects.

While I recommend reading Seneff’s paper in its entirety, I’ve extracted key sections below, starting with how the spike protein can trigger pathological damage leading to heart, lung and brain diseases:18

"In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.

These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature … Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.

Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality … The ‘in vivo studies’ they referred to … had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.

Suzuki et al. (2021) went on to demonstrate experimentally that the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at a low concentration … activated the MEK/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway to promote cell growth. They speculated that these effects would not be restricted to the lung vasculature.

The signaling cascade triggered in the heart vasculature would cause coronary artery disease, and activation in the brain could lead to stroke. Systemic hypertension would also be predicted. They hypothesized that this ability of the spike protein to promote pulmonary arterial hypertension could predispose patients who recover from SARS-CoV-2 to later develop right ventricular heart failure.

Furthermore, they suggested that a similar effect could happen in response to the mRNA vaccines, and they warned of potential long-term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on the spike protein.

An interesting study by Lei et. al. (2021) found that pseudovirus — spheres decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein but lacking any viral DNA in their core — caused inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally.

They then exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue.

This study makes it clear that spike protein alone, unassociated with the rest of the viral genome, is sufficient to cause the endothelial damage associated with COVID-19. The implications for vaccines intended to cause cells to manufacture the spike protein are clear and are an obvious cause for concern."

74% of Post-Jab Deaths Linked to the Shot

(Continued in next post)

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v31u89d/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

(Continued from post above)

74% of Post-Jab Deaths Linked to the Shot

(Rumble video embedded at the end of this post)

Dr. Peter McCullough has also presented hypotheses for how the shot damages the heart. In a July 2023 systematic review19,20 of 325 autopsy cases, McCullough and his team concluded that 62.5% to 73.9% of post-jab deaths were likely caused by the injection.

The most implicated organ system was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%).

In the featured Daily Clout interview above, McCullough explains the jab’s mechanisms of action that appear to be responsible for a majority of post-jab heart-related deaths. In myocarditis, the electrical current can no longer conduct smoothly through the heart muscle, causing an abnormal heart rhythm. This abnormal heart rhythm can then lead to sudden cardiac death.

Lipid nanoparticles have been found to damage electrical conduction in the myelin sheath, so it makes sense that they may also damage electrical conduction in the heart. What’s more, when lipid nanoparticles are taken up by human somatic cells — nonreproductive cells, found in the heart and other internal organs — it causes syncytia formation, a process in which individual cells fuse together. This, in turn, can exacerbate the progression of heart failure.21

Because the heart prefers lipids over glucose for fuel, it may preferentially take up lipid nanoparticles, more so than other tissues. On top of that, exercise increases blood flow, which draws more lipid nanoparticles to the heart. Once your heart is inflamed, adrenaline surges can become deadly.

McCullough cites research showing there are two primary periods of sudden cardiac death: during exercise and between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. The common factor between these two is adrenaline. Adrenaline surges during exercise and in the natural waking process. If you have myocarditis, this adrenaline surge can be enough to trigger sudden cardiac death.

Why Can’t Pfizer Answer the Question?
As you can see, there’s no shortage of theories and hypotheses to explain how the mRNA COVID shots can damage your heart and cause myocarditis, so the fact that Pfizer’s reps cannot cite a single mechanism of action to explain it is simply not believable.

It’s not that they can’t answer the question. They don’t want to, and the most likely reason for holding this information back is because if they admit knowing how the damage is done, they may be held liable since they never warned anyone about it. Their safest route right now is to say they don’t know, and then, at some point in the future, pretend as though a recent investigation finally solved the mystery. Commenting on Thiru’s inability to answer his questions, Rennick said:22

"Last night, the Senate finally got to question Pfizer as to the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine. It was disappointing that they would not acknowledge the lack of testing they performed prior to the rollout, nor could they explain why it damages heart muscle.

If they can’t explain the biological mechanism as to why it causes damage to the heart, then they can’t guarantee it doesn’t cause other injuries. Despite all of this they continue to claim the vaccine is safe and effective without qualifying the risks."

Resources for Those Injured by the COVID Jab
Aside from autopsy assessments, case reports of harms and various other studies, things like job statistics, disability claims, life insurance claims and all-cause mortality statistics also tell us that the COVID jabs are having a devastating effect.23 All have skyrocketed since the introduction of these COVID jabs.

If you got one or more jabs and suffered an injury, first and foremost, never ever take another COVID booster, another mRNA gene therapy shot or regular vaccine. You need to end the assault on your body.

The same goes for anyone who has taken one or more COVID jabs and had the good fortune of not experiencing debilitating side effects. Your health may still be impacted long-term, so don’t take any more shots.

When it comes to treatment, it seems like many of the treatments that worked against severe COVID-19 infection also help ameliorate adverse effects from the jab. This makes sense, as the toxic, most damaging part of the virus is the spike protein, and that’s what your whole body is producing if you got the jab.

So, the primary task to prevent and/or address post-jab injuries is to eliminate the spike protein. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine bind to and facilitate the removal of spike protein. According to McCullough, nattokinase, bromelain and curcumin also help degrade the spike protein.

For a comprehensive treatment plan, see the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) I-RECOVER protocol. It’s continuously updated as more data become available, so be sure to download the latest version straight from the FLCCC website at covid19criticalcare.com.24 Additional detox remedies can be found in "World Council for Health Reveals Spike Protein Detox."

+ Sources and References
1 Australian Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee Full Hearing August 3, 2023
2, 22 Trial Site News August 5, 2023
3, 4, 7 LeeFang.com April 24, 2023
5 ASCP December 6, 2021
6 UnHerd July 3, 2023
8 PanData.org
9 COVID Myth Buster Series (Marc Girardot) Substack
10, 11 COVID Myth Buster Series (Marc Girardot) Substack June 5, 2023
12 COVID Myth Buster Series (Marc Girardot) Substack January 9, 2023
13 Twitter Marc Girardot August 5, 2023
14 Circulation July 20, 2021; 144: 471-484
15 European Heart Journal July 20, 2020: ehaa534
16 Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326
17, 18 International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444
19 Zenodo July 6, 2023
20 Lancet Preprints July 5, 2023
21 BioRxiv May 10, 2023
23 Vaxxter.com June 12, 2023
24 Covid19criticalcare.com


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2vzco4/?pub=ijro7

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/un...mectin-swindle

The Unforgivable Ivermectin Swindle

BY TYLER DURDEN
WEDNESDAY, AUG 16, 2023 - 09:45 AM
Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance

This month, lawyers for the Food and Drug Administration admitted in a U.S. court that doctors “do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID”, an admission that stands at stark odds with a multiple year campaign to misinform, misalign and tarnish the reputation of one of the world’s most successful drugs, which could have been used to save hundreds of thousands of lives during the pandemic.

“FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID. So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine,” Ashley Cheung Honold, lawyer representing the FDA said this month.

I know this likely isn’t the case for my regular readers, but if you’re new to the blog and you happen to be one of those people who still doesn’t quite understand that you are routinely lied to by the media and the billionaires that run our country, I can think of no better indoctrination than the travesty of a fraud that was just perpetrated on the American people regarding ivermectin.

For those who haven’t followed the story, during the course of the Covid pandemic, it was revealed that ivermectin - a drug that has been administered billions of times to humans and is on the World Health Organization’s list of Essential Medicines - was found in numerous clinical trials to have efficacy in early treatment of Covid-19. If you’re looking for a primer on this, here is a website that aggregates all of the clinical trials and here is a discussion with Bret Weinstein and Dr. Pierre Kory that serves as a great introduction to the topic.



If you’ve been at least semiconscious over the last two years, you’ve noticed that early means of treating Covid outside of the vaccines (like Vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin) were routinely shunned by “the science” and then, by proxy, the useful idiots in the mainstream media.

Out of all of the early treatments, ivermectin got the shortest end of the stick. Not only was it likely the most efficacious of all the early treatments, it was also routinely subject to bastardization and a berating by the media.

The disinformation campaign about ivermectin, spearheaded by mainstream media (“brought to you by Pfizer!”) reached its fever pitch when the media and government agencies alike appeared to knowingly and maliciously juxtapose the human dosage of the drug with the coincidental and mostly unrelated fact that it was also used in a veterinary dosage to deworm horses.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=QAkQlZgnbUQ

Rather than distinguish one ivermectin use from the other clearly, these bad actors instead willingly chose to perpetuate the brazen lie that ivermectin was only horse medicine.

The media fostered this lie because their sponsorship and advertising revenue depended on it. The lie was then used as a weapon against anyone who discussed the legitimate usage of the human drug and its storied history of success.

But the most noxious example of media dishonesty came from coverage of Joe Rogan, who took ivermectin after getting Covid. CNN took footage that Rogan posted on his personal Instagram, edited the color scheme to make Rogan look worse than he originally appeared, and then proclaimed that Rogan was taking “horse dewormer”.

CNN’s version of the video is on the left, with Rogan’s original on the right:



In short, the coverage of the drug was maliciously and purposefully skewed to present a false narrative to viewers. Behold, this incredible asshole:



This is why, back in 2021, I wrote an article called “The Hysterical Joe Rogan Ivermectin Coverage Is Why People Don’t Trust Media Anymore”.

Rogan responded to the coverage in 2021, stating:

“They’re making **** up! They keep saying I’m taking horse dewormer. I literally got it from a doctor. It’s an American company. They won the Nobel Prize in 2015 for use in human beings and CNN is saying I’m taking horse dewormer. They must know that’s a lie.”

“If the internet says it, who cares. But CNN is saying it. Jim Acosta!”

“CNN was saying I am a distributor of misinformation. I don’t know what’s going on, man. You know, there is a lot of speculation. One of the speculations involves the emergency use authorization for the vaccines. That, in order for there to be an emergency use authorization, there has to be no treatment for a disease.”

“The grand conspiracy is that the pharmaceutical companies are in cahoots to try and make anybody who takes this stuff look crazy. But what’s crazy is look how better I got [sic]! I got better pretty quick, bitch.”

Rogan then had a chance to confront someone from the network when he played host for Dr. Sanjay Gupta, who appeared on The Joe Rogan Experience to chat about public health, Covid, the nation’s distrust in scientists and his network.



Source: The Joe Rogan Experience

Rogan wasted no time in calling out Gupta, and his network, for lying about him.

"They lied and said I was taking horse dewormer," Rogan said to Gupta.

While Gupta starts trying to change the subject, Rogan eventually backs him into a corner. "If you got a human pill, it shouldn't be called that," Gupta is forced to concede.

Rogan then asked Gupta: "Does it bother you that the news network you work for out and out lied? They outright lied about me taking horse dewormer."

"They shouldn't have said that," Gupta blurted out in response.

"Why did they do it?" Rogan asks.

"I don't know," a defeated Gupta says.

Gupta then took to his home field, CNN, to have a laugh with Don Lemon, who was running damage control about the entire interview. Amidst Lemon’s snide and dismissive attitude toward many of Rogan’s valid points, he also denied ever calling ivermectin horse dewormer.



And it wasn’t just CNN. NBC News called ivermectin “widely discredited” without any qualifiers. When the Rogan story dropped in late 2021, I did a search throughout the mainstream media and here’s the first four results that popped up:



< out of time here -more links and content at link >



And so, today, the purpose of this article is to finally set the record straight and put a bookend on my long string of articles about ivermectin. The conclusions should be obvious to anyone at this point.

Pfizer, Moderna and Astra Zeneca wanted to sell their experimental vaccines in the absence of long-term safety data.

They couldn’t do it under Emergency Use Authorization if ivermectin and other early treatments were found to have efficacy.

Ergo, the media, sponsored by these same pharma companies launched a malicious misinformation campaign in the face of demonstrable proof of both efficacy and safety for ivermectin.

This campaign knowingly mislabeled a drug with a decades-long history of success in humans as horse medicine.

As this took place, additional “rigged” clinical studies, many of which with significant conflicts, tried to paint a picture of ivermectin not being efficacious through dishonest means (learn all about this here).

From there, government worked with social media to stifle and censor anyone who raised critical questions or told the inconvenient truth in the midst of the pandemic.

Finally, after all the damage was done and the vaccine grift ended, the FDA casually and cavalierly admitted that doctors “do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat Covid.”

If your eyes aren’t open after understanding what just happened here, you are not paying attention.

[onawah]

Vaccinated Outbreak at CDC Bigger Than Reported
FACTS MATTER
ROMAN BALMAKOV
8/15/23

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YuJeTb1DsBQ

(WOW, what goes around sure does come around!!)

"It turns out that the COVID super-spreader event at the CDC headquarters was actually significantly larger than previously reported. Despite the non-stop messaging that’s been coming out of the CDC, every once in a while, there’s an event that pops a hole in their well-crafted narrative.

One of the most recent was the CDC event held by the CDC headquarters, which experienced a massive COVID outbreak despite nearly everyone at that event being vaccinated.

However, it gets even wilder: we here at The Epoch Times were able to successfully file a Freedom of Information Act request through which we obtained internal documents from inside the CDC, showing that the outbreak was larger than the CDC previously reported and, despite what the CDC wrongly claimed, people were actually hospitalized."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epocht...M7rVnO7yPts%3D

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/stkirsch/status/...416951055?s=20

text (I could not find a link to study in these tweets)

Retsef Levi
@RetsefL
Excellent Science Immunology study is very bad news to the mRNA/nanolipids platform!

Showing that vaccine-induced myocarditis is likely driven by the platform & not antigen specific (i.e., spike protein)!

Implying that future mRNA-based vaccines/drugs would have same risk!

Also providing another evidence of sustained heart scarring and abnormalities! Vaccine-induced myocarditis is NOT mild!

@BretWeinstein

@DrAseemMalhotra

@P_McCulloughMD

[onawah]

RFK Jr's Own Family DUPED by Media's Lies
8/18/23
Jeremy R. Hammond <newsletter@jeremyrhammond.com
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2023/...y+Media+s+Lies

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded in this post)

"As Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky illuminated in their book Manufacturing Consent, the mainstream media fulfill a propaganda function by manipulating public opinion to favor (or not care about) criminal government policies.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has long been exposing many of the same criminal policies that media outlets like the New York Times advocates under the guise of "journalism", so it is only natural for the Times to constantly demonize him.
What's more remarkable is how even some of RFK Jr.'s own family members choose to believe the mainstream media's brazen lies about him.
The media make claims about him that any journalist worthy of the job description could easily check. And anyone checking the primary sources can see how the media's claims are demonstrably false.
So, I once again did the media's job for them by fact-checking a recent Times article about how some of RFK Jr.'s relatives have been criticizing and condemning him for supposedly spreading "conspiracy theories" and racist tropes:
See how the media lie effectively about RFK Jr.
The media should not be able to get away with such brazen lying. Yet they do. The masses consider articles like this one from the Times to be journalism, and therein lies their error. It's not journalism. It's propaganda advancing a political agenda (i.e., getting Biden reelected and continuing the present policy course of the criminal regime in Washington, DC).
We must combat the dangerous propaganda emanating from the mainstream media. Please share this article so others can see how they are being lied to and their thoughts manipulated. (You don't have to favor RFK Jr as a candidate to understand the importance of truth in media!)"


Why Do Some of RFK Jr.’s Own Family Members Believe the Media’s Lies about Him?
by Jeremy R. Hammond
Aug 18, 2023
https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2023/...y+Media+s+Lies

"Table of Contents
Introduction
The Power of the Mainstream Media’s Political Propaganda
The ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Canard
Deflecting from Real Tyranny with the ‘Microchip’ Strawman
The Unproven Mortality Benefit of COVID‑19 Vaccines
Lying about Kennedy’s Anne Frank Comment
The Threat of Genetically Targeted Bioweapons
Conclusion

Introduction
The New York Times vs. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: How the Mainstream Media Spread Vaccine Information
Get my newsletter plus access to my new free e-book revealing how the mainstream media spread vaccine misinformation.

Yes, I Want this FREE Download
On August 6, the New York Times published an article by Peter Baker titled “Anguish in Camelot: Kennedy Campaign Roils Storied Political Family”. The article’s one-sentence summary states, “The presidential bid by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has tested the bonds of an iconic Democratic clan that does not want him to run and does not know what to do about it.”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., also known as Bobby, is the nephew of President John F. Kennedy, who was assassinated in 1963. He is the son of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, who was assassinated in 1968 while campaigning for the presidency. (Despite this family history, the Biden administration recently declined RFK Jr.’s request for Secret Service protection, and the media as usual have been misinforming the public about the significance of this decision.)

Baker’s one-sentence summary conveys the message that RFK Jr.’s family is united in opposing his candidacy, which is untrue. The article’s featured image is of Kennedy giving a speech in Boston, Massachusetts, to announce his candidacy on April 19, 2023. To the left and above the photographer, out of view of the telephoto lens, were members of his family who were there to support him.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qLar8dg_DTw

The aim of the New York Times article is to inform us how certain members of Kennedy’s family oppose his candidacy due to their disagreement with certain of his views.

However, Baker’s article is not journalism. It is a work of political propaganda aimed at prejudicing us against Kennedy as a presidential candidate who is challenging Joe Biden for the Democratic nomination.

You can tell this by the way the Times portrays RFK Jr.’s critical relatives as though holding correct opinions about him, which portrayal is accompanied by the Times’s own reliance on strawman argumentation for the purpose of demonization.

A strawman argument is logical fallacy whereby a false characterization of an opposing view is presented, and then a counterargument is made to challenge that “strawman” instead of addressing the actual opposing view. This is a favored propaganda device utilized by the mainstream media to deflect from real issues and to control people’s thoughts by deceiving them into holding mistaken beliefs.

In this instance, we are supposed to believe that Kennedy is a crazy conspiracy theorist prone to bigoted rants. To persuade us into drawing this false conclusion about Kennedy, the Times demonstrably lies about his views and statements.

The Power of the Mainstream Media’s Political Propaganda
The type of political propaganda produced by the New York Times is highly effective. As illuminated in Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky’s seminal treatise on the subject, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, the mainstream media serve a propaganda function, limiting the range of allowable opinion to a very narrow spectrum in order to manipulate public opinion in favor of harmful and outright criminal government policies.

This function of the media helps to explain why Democrats tended to place even more faith in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) after it repeatedly lied to the public about COVID‑19-related matters than they did before the pandemic.The lies propagated by the CDC included falsehoods aimed at serving the financial interests of the pharmaceutical companies, such as deceiving people into the belief that two doses of an mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine would confer durable sterilizing immunity, ending the pandemic by stopping infection and transmission of SARS‑CoV‑2. The reliance on this lie by government officials reveals how the aim was to manufacture consent for the policy aim of achieving high vaccination rates rather than to properly educate the public with respect for the right to informed consent.

The consequence of the media’s parroting of the government’s lies was the systematic violation of this fundamental human right.

The consequence of the media’s parroting of the government’s lies was the systematic violation of this fundamental human right.
Throughout the pandemic, the government colluded with social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to censor factually accurate information that didn’t align with the adopted political agenda, while the Big Tech companies in turn partnered with the media’s faux “fact check” industry to suppress truth while spreading deceitful government and pharmaceutical industry propaganda.

I was banned by LinkedIn, for example, for accurately reporting how the CDC’s claim that COVID‑19 vaccines confer better protection than natural immunity was contradicted at the time by virtually all the non-CDC-originating scientific literature and was later falsified by the CDC’s own data as reported by its own researchers in its own MMWR journal.

Yet a recent poll showed that, instead of being repulsed by how the government sought to systematically violate the First Amendment to the Constitution, which is supposed to protect our freedom of speech and freedom of the press, most Democrats now favor continued censorship and trust the government to tell them what to think.

The malevolent influence of the New York Times and other propaganda outlets helps to explain how this situation can exist in a supposedly free country supposedly populated by free-thinking individuals.

In fact, such statist propaganda is so effective—as Peter Baker’s article clearly demonstrates—that members of the Kennedy clan who oppose Bobby Kennedy’s candidacy have themselves fallen prey to the brazen lies being told about him by mainstream media outlets, with the standard for deception being set by America’s “newspaper of record”, the New York Times.

The ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Canard
The New York Times’ “Anguish in Camelot” article opens by reporting that the “only grandson of President John F. Kennedy”, Jack Schlossberg, has “had enough” with his cousin Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Just days before Schlossberg published an Instagram post criticizing RFK Jr., the Times states, “his conspiracy-minded cousin had suggested that Covid‑19 had been engineered to protect Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people.”

This claim about RFK Jr. happens to be untrue, but we’ll come back to that.

Undisclosed by the Times is that Schlossberg’s Instagram post was a political statement in which he endorsed Joe Biden for president, showering Biden with praise to such an extent that he ludicrously credited Biden with having “ended the COVID pandemic”. (One lesson from the pandemic that must surely have been hard not to learn is that the virus does not obey the whims of politicians.)

While it should be obvious that such ridiculous political propaganda is not to be taken seriously, the New York Times does just that. To try to get us to take Schlossberg’s criticism of his cousin seriously, Baker goes on to ridicule what he describes as Kennedy’s “conspiratorial musings”.

Here, Baker links to another Times article published on July 6, from which we can learn that one of these “conspiratorial musings” is the belief that JFK’s assassination was not the work of a lone gunman but the result of a conspiracy—a view that happens to be shared by most Americans.

That President Kennedy “was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy” was also the conclusion drawn in 1979 by the House of Representatives’ Select Committee on Assassinations.

On August 15, reporter Tucker Carlson published an interview with RFK Jr in which Kennedy explains his view about the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the motives for his uncle’s assassination. Viewers can watch starting at about the 16-minute mark in part two of the interview judge for themselves whether he sounds crazy and his conclusions implausible (and why hasn’t the government declassified the documents?):

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5oHsX-3lmNw

(In part one, Kennedy also discussed the Biden administration’s denial of his request for Secret Service protection, and he mentions my name and the article I published on that topic on August 7. Other important topics discussed included the war in Ukraine, the migrant humanitarian crisis, and the harms of inflation.)

Incidentally, Kennedy explains during the interview that it was the CIA with its malevolent influence on the media that popularized the use of the phrase “conspiracy theory” to dismiss legitimate perspectives as though loony. The New York Times of today would surely make the CIA of JFK’s era proud.

Deflecting from Real Tyranny with the ‘Microchip’ Strawman
Another “conspiracy theory” propagated by RFK Jr., according to the New York Times, is that “coronavirus vaccines were developed to control people via microchips.”

The Times evidently wants us to believe that Kennedy has propagated the claim that COVID‑19 vaccines contain microchips. In a paper published in the journal PLoS One titled “COVID‑19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories”, we find the following paraphrased summary of this microchip claim:

With the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine, microchips (nano-chips) will also be introduced into the human body, then 5G networks will enter the business, through which the world elite will send various signals to the chips, thereby controlling humanity.

The Times notably makes no effort to substantiate its claim that Kennedy has been among those spreading the claim that the vaccines contain microchips.

The simple explanation for this omission of evidence by the Times is that Kennedy has never claimed that the vaccines contain microchips.

This is a good lesson for the savvy news consumer: Whenever you see the media saying that somebody said something, but they do not provide a quote or otherwise provide a source for you to verify that the person said the thing, that is a huge red flag that you are consuming propaganda rather than journalism.

The New York Times is not the only mainstream propaganda outlet to spread this disinformation about Kennedy. Numerous others have utilized the same strawman argument to demonize him, and the Times is simply regurgitating the lie.

In an article published on June 22, for example, Slate falsely claimed that Kennedy had claimed that Microsoft founder Bill Gates “is implanting tracking devices into humans through microchips in the vaccine.”

That article cited a Forbes article from August 15, 2020, that similarly tried to connect Kennedy to the “conspiracy theory that Gates plans to install tracking devices into humans with the coronavirus vaccine”.

The same day as Forbes, The Daily Beast ran an article likewise trying to connect Kennedy to “the notion that Gates planned to insert microchips in would-be vaccine patients to monitor and control their behavior”.

Both Forbes and The Daily Beast referenced an Instagram post from Kennedy on August 11, 2020, that, by The Daily Beast’s account, propagated the “conspiracy theory” that “Bill Gates has hatched a plot to implement tracking devices on billions of people under the guise of a COVID‑19 vaccine.”

In fact, Kennedy’s Instagram post did not claim that the vaccines were being used to implant microchips into people.

His post instead included a meme with an image of Bill Gates laughing and the words “The digitalized economy? We get rid of cash and coins. We give you a chip. We put all your money in your chip. If you refuse a vaccine, we turn off the chip and you starve!”

“We get rid of cash and coins. We give you a chip. We put all your money in your chip.”
It is obvious from the actual text of the meme that the chip being referred to is not one that would be implanted into people via vaccination (because, logically, there would be no chip in unvaccinated people to turn off).

Hence, the claim that Kennedy claimed that there were microchips in the vaccines is a brazen and deliberate lie.

The purposeful effect of that lie, in addition to simply demonizing Kennedy for something he never said, is to deflect from the meme’s legitimate underlying message about the threat of authoritarian governance. The meme was obviously intended as a darkly humorous tongue-in-cheek warning about a possible dystopian future based on current realities.

For instance, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has advocated the “benefits of a cashless society” in a future “digital economy”, and it is of course true that the powers-that-be have been moving toward implementation of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). Among the central banks moving in this direction is the Federal Reserve.

At the “Bitcoin 2023” event in Miami, Florida, on May 19, 2023, Kennedy gave a talk in which he discussed the existential threat of governments abusing their power to control access to currency as a means of silencing critics and controlling people’s behavior.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fz7FPl065II

An example is China’s “social credit” system.

We also witnessed how the government of Canada froze bank accounts of people who protested its authoritarian lockdown measures including vaccine mandates.

More recently, in the UK, former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage had his personal and business accounts with Coutts bank closed on what he claimed were “political grounds”. As reported by The New American, the BBC disputed this with a report claiming that the reason for his account’s closure was that his account balances had fallen below the required threshold:

The broadcaster was forced to issue a significant correction to its report and send a formal letter of apology to Farage after he obtained a 40-page dossier that Coutts had compiled to make the case for debanking him. That document revealed that although the bank found that Farage met the “criteria for commercial retention,” it was closing his accounts because his “values … do not align with the bank’s.”

The BBC changed its headline and acknowledged “that the information we reported—that Coutts’ decision on Mr Farage’s account did not involve considerations about his political views—turned out not to be accurate and have apologized to Mr Farage.”

In the US just last month, Dr. Joseph Mercola, the founder of the leading natural health website Mercola.com, reported that “JP Morgan Chase Bank informed me they are closing all of my business accounts, along with the personal accounts of my CEO, my CFO and their respective spouses and children”.

Mercola commented, “This is what the new social credit system looks like, and what every soul on the planet can expect from the central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) that are being rolled out. Go against the prevailing narrative of the day, and your financial life will be deleted with the push of a button.”

There are numerous other examples of individuals being debanked for expressing views unapproved by the political establishment.

It is also true that the powers-that-be have envisioned the use of microchips as part of the envisioned digitalized economy.

For example, the lead paragraph of a World Economic Forum article on the subject in 2017 stated, “When we talk about a cashless society, we usually mean using contactless bank cards or smartphones to make everyday purchases. But what if you don’t need to carry a device at all?” The article went on to discuss “the tantalizing prospect” of implanting microchips into workers that would in time become a “passport for everything”.

A news roundup post from the WEF linked to that article with the creepy advice, “When your mobile phone isn’t mobile enough. Try an implanted microchip.”

A WEF article in August 2022 stated that “implant technologies could become the norm in the future”. The article included the less-than-reassuring remark, “Are we moving towards a ‘brave new world’? As scary as chip implants may sound, they form part of a natural evolution that wearables once underwent.”

We are further advised by the WEF, “If the idea of a chip in your body makes you cringe, consider all the pharmaceuticals you take without question.”

The telling assumption underling that piece of advice is that we should set aside our own intuition and do what we’re told without question as opposed to considering our own feelings and thinking for ourselves.

“If the idea of a chip in your body makes you cringe, consider all the pharmaceuticals you take without question.”
The WEF has also advocated the use of “vaccine passports” as a means of coercing people into accepting vaccinations and penalizing individuals who choose not to accept these pharmaceutical products. The World Health Organization (WHO), too, has pushed for a global vaccine passport system; and in the wake of the COVID‑19 lockdowns, the WHO has been aiming to acquire even more centralized power to implement authoritarian measures in the event of another pandemic.

In February 2021, the WHO issued an interim position paper that advised against countries implementing vaccine passport systems not on any ethical or legal grounds but only because of the technicality that the COVID‑19 vaccines hadn’t been shown to prevent transmission (a fact acknowledgeable for such internal deliberations but withheld from the public relations messaging about vaccine effectiveness). Hence, basic medical ethics and the legally protected right to informed consent were not among the WHO’s considerations.

The WHO receives funding from vaccine manufacturers, including GSK, Sanofi, and Merck. Presently, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the WHO’s largest source of funding (after Germany and before the US).

In addition to funding the WHO’s “Global Vaccine Action Plan”, the Gates Foundation has also joined the US government in partnering with Moderna in the development of the mRNA technologies used in its COVID‑19 vaccine.

It is also true that Bill Gates has funded the development of implantable biotech specifically to track individuals’ vaccination status. (The digital vaccine certificate utilized a “quantum dot dye” technology rather than a microchip—“something like a bar-code tattoo”.)

Gates was among the most prominent advocates of the disastrous authoritarian lockdowns and has advocated the use of vaccine passports.

Journalists Jeremy Loffredo and Max Blumenthal in October 2021 published a detailed exposé of Bill Gates’ role in the global “public health” establishment titled “Public health or private wealth? How digital vaccine passports pave way for unprecedented surveillance capitalism”. They reported how “The titans of global capitalism are exploiting the Covid‑19 crisis to institute social credit-style ID systems across the West.” (Note that the “capitalism” that Loffredo and Blumenthal refer to is the opposite of free market capitalism, more rightly labeled “crony capitalism” or perhaps most appropriately “fascism”.)

The Gates Foundation had, for example, funded “a WHO paper providing ‘implementation guidance’ for proof of vaccination certifications across the world.”

Another Gates-funded effort is “the world’s largest digital ID database, known as Aadhaar”, which “is named for a 12 digit number that serves as proof of identity and address, among other markers, anywhere in India.” As Loffredo and Blumenthal reported,

In 2016, the Gates Foundation ponied up funding for a World Bank project called the Identity for Development (ID4D) Initiative for the declared purpose of bringing the “Aadhaar approach to other countries.”

To date, the World Bank has invested $1.2 billion into the ID4D initiative, with the official aim of creating “identification systems using 21st Century solutions.”

. . . Back in 2016, Bill Gates’ Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), Microsoft, Accenture and the Rockefeller Foundation established a new consortium to provide digital ID certificates to infants when they receive their routine immunizations. They called it ID2020, incidentally naming it for the year that a global pandemic would be declared.

ID2020 says it is “dedicated to spearheading a global digital biometric identity standard,” and claims Digital IDs will lead to “financial independence.”

In February 2021, ID2020 announced the launch of the “Good Health Pass Collaborative”, whose website’s homepage features former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair—who joined US President George W. Bush in initiating an illegal war of aggression against Iraq on the basis of lies about Iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)—saying that we “urgently require an internationally-recognized system of health passes” for travelers to “prove their health status” as a step “to limit the spread of new COVID‑19 variants.”

The “Interoperability Blueprint” page of the site makes clear that “health status” includes “proof of vaccination”.

Bill Gates has also expressed his desire for global depopulation and has advocated mass vaccination as a means to get there on the grounds that people in developing countries wouldn’t have so many children if they had a higher odds of surviving childhood—a belief that ignores the scientific evidence that non-live vaccines like the diphtheria, tetanus, and whole-cell pertussis (DTP) vaccine are actually associated with an increased risk of childhood mortality.

In his Instagram post, Kennedy recommended the investigative reporting of independent journalist James Corbett, who in a major video series on Bill Gates has observed how the Gates Foundation has funded “the research, development and deployment of injectable contraceptives to the developing world.”

Corbett continues:

In 2014 it was announced that Microchips Biotech, Inc., a company in Lexington, Massachusetts, had developed a new form of birth control: “a wireless implant that can be turned on and off with a remote control and that is designed to last up to 16 years.” According to MIT Technology Review, the idea originated when Bill Gates visited Robert Langer’s MIT lab in 2012 and asked him if it would be possible to create an implantable birth control device that could be turned on or off remotely. Langer referred Gates to the controlled release microchip technology he had invented and licensed to MicroCHIPS Biotechnology, and the Gates Foundation granted $20 million to the firm to develop the implants.

Corbett goes on to accurately report how Gates has aimed to reduce the global population while maintaining a “core mission of vaccinating every child on the planet to providing every child with a digital biometric identity.”

The Gates Foundation is also a major funder of “The Vaccine Alliance” organization known as Gavi, which in 2018, Corbett notes, “issued a call for innovation in digital technologies ‘for finding, identifying and registering the most vulnerable children.’ The call specifically requested technologies for capturing, storing and enrolling the biometric details of infants on ‘rugged biometric devices.’”

In sum, the message communicated by the meme in Kennedy’s Instagram post is firmly grounded in the truth that powerful individuals like Bill Gates want to move us into a cashless society in which we buy and sell using central bank digital currencies in connection with digital IDs, implants, and vaccine passport systems.

Here is the meme Kennedy shared for your consideration it in light of all of the above information about the push toward centralized global governance; compare its true message with how the mainstream media distort it to falsely claim that Kennedy claimed that COVID‑19 vaccines contain microchips:


"
(Continued)

[onawah]

(Continued from post above)

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded in this post)

"This meme speaks accurately to how emerging technologies could be used and how the powers-that-be evidently would use them if We the People do not act to defend our precious liberty.

After falsely suggesting that Kennedy is among those who have claimed that the COVID‑19 vaccines contain microchips, the Times notes that Kennedy issued a statement in April responding to public criticisms against him from family members by saying, “I bear them no ill will. Families can disagree and still love each other.”

Asked to provide a comment to the Times, Kennedy responded, “It’s pretty clear that the Times is not going to treat me fairly honestly so I’m going to decline.”

Indeed, Baker’s article clearly and incontrovertibly demonstrates the Times’ dishonesty and prejudicial treatment of Mr. Kennedy.

That the Times is so dishonest is unsurprising; the newspaper is just fulfilling its usual function. What is truly remarkable is the fact that some of Kennedy’s own family members choose to believe the media’s lies about him.

The Unproven Mortality Benefit of COVID‑19 Vaccines
“For years,” the Times article goes on, “Mr. Kennedy has made himself into a champion of the vaccine resistance movement, promoting spurious assertions about the dangers of inoculations and once calling the Covid‑19 vaccine the ‘deadliest vaccine ever made.’”

It is notable that the Times in this instance chose to describe the movement Mr. Kennedy has been at the forefront of as “the vaccine resistance movement” instead of the usual “anti-vaccine movement”. This might represent progress since “anti-vaxxer” is the derogatory label used by the media to dismiss legitimate concerns about government vaccine policies. This is presumably a result of Kennedy’s consistent insistence that he is not “anti-vaccine” but rather pro-informed consent.

At the same time, the Times’ description of the movement appropriately conjures up the Borg characters from Star Trek: “Resistance is futile. All will be assimilated.”

This results from the Times’ effort to avoid describing the movement in a way that accurately characterizes Bobby Kennedy’s views—such as by calling it the “health freedom movement”.

It is also notable that the Times dismisses Kennedy’s remark about COVID‑19 vaccines as false without even attempting to provide a counterargument. If COVID‑19 vaccines are not, then which vaccine is the deadliest?

If COVID‑19 vaccines are not, then which vaccine is the deadliest?
The context of the quote matters, as well. The quote is from a presentation from Kennedy to the Louisiana House of Representatives on December 6, 2021.

During that presentation, Kennedy pointed out the fact that the clinical trial data from the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine showed that those who received the vaccine were more likely to die than those who did not. This outcome was most notably due to an imbalance in outcomes whereby more subjects died from cardiac arrest in the vaccine group—deaths that were plausibly caused by the vaccine.

As observed by leading researchers into the “non-specific effects” of vaccines, the clinical trial data for mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines showed no mortality benefit of vaccination.

The authors of a study in Clinical Research in Cardiology looked at autopsy reports of people who died unexpectedly within 20 days of receiving COVID‑19 vaccination and concluded, “Overall, autopsy findings indicated death due to acute arrhythmogenic cardiac failure. Thus, myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS‑CoV‑2 vaccination.”

A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths following COVID‑19 vaccination published on the preprint server Zenodo found, “The most implicated organ system in COVID‑19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%), and multiple organ systems (7%).” Out of a total of 44 papers containing 325 autopsy cases, “A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID‑19 vaccination.”

A public opinion survey by Rasmussen Reports in March 2023 found that “Nearly as many Americans believe someone close to them died from side effects of the COVID‑19 vaccine as died from the disease itself.”

The specific argument of Kennedy’s that the New York Times references from his testimony to the Louisiana House of Representatives is that there have been more deaths reported to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) than to all other vaccines combined for the 30-year life of the surveillance system.



Here is what the VAERS data look like in graphical form from a study published by the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), with reported deaths on the right:



VAERS was established under a 1986 law that granted broad legal immunity to vaccine manufacturers against vaccine injury lawsuits and created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) to shift the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical industry and onto the taxpaying consumers (the program is funded by an excise tax included in the price of each vaccine dose).

While the VAERS data do not prove that COVID‑19 vaccines were the cause of the reported deaths, this is certainly an alarming safety signal that the New York Times has previously tried to dismiss and deflect attention from.

Instructively, the Times has two virtually opposite descriptions of VAERS depending solely on the criterion of whether the data are being used to support the claim of vaccine safety or to draw attention to signals of potential harms from vaccination.

When attempting to reassure its readers about vaccine safety, the Times describes VAERS as a reliable system for rapidly identifying any possible harms, “an aggressive system to track and detect side effects so they can be addressed”.

Yet, in response to observations about the alarming number of deaths reported to VAERS following COVID‑19 vaccination, the Times dismisses VAERS as “a decades-old system that relies on self-reported cases from patients and health care providers”, a system that “generally cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.” Health officials, the Times tells us in this alternative context, “warn against using VAERS to make determinations about vaccine risks.”

Thus, to support its own claims of vaccine safety, the Times describes VAERS as a reliable surveillance system for rapidly identifying any possible harms from vaccines, whereas when VAERS data reveal an alarming safety signal, the Times dismisses it as an outdated system that is practically worthless for that purpose.

The Times instructively does not dispute the facts presented by Kennedy that the clinical trials for the Pfizer vaccine showed no mortality benefit or that there have been more deaths reported after receipt of COVID‑19 vaccines than for all other vaccines throughout the life of the VAERS program.

For the obvious reason, the Times also declines to substantiate its dismissal of Kennedy’s conclusion that more people have died from COVID‑19 vaccines than from any other vaccine over in the past three decades by enlightening us as to which other vaccine it thinks has been deadlier.

Lying about Kennedy’s Anne Frank Comment
The New York Times next regurgitates one of the usual propaganda talking points about Bobby Kennedy emanating from the mainstream media, which is that he “has said Anne Frank had more freedom during the Holocaust than Americans pressured to take the vaccine”.

The claim that Kennedy has claimed that unvaccinated Americans experienced worse tyranny during the lockdowns than Jews did during the Holocaust is a complete fabrication on the part of the mainstream media.

Kennedy never said any such thing. This claim is yet another outright lie, as anyone can verify for themselves by watching the speech he gave at a “Defeat the Mandates” rally in Washington, DC, and seeing how the media take his statement about Anne Frank completely out of context.

Evidently, Times writer Peter Baker couldn’t be bothered to do journalism by actually watching Kennedy’s speech, as indicated by the fact that, instead of providing a link to the speech, he supports his own gross mischaracterization of it by lazily relying on a Washington Post article with a headline falsely claiming that RFK Jr. said that “the unvaccinated have less freedom than Anne Frank did”.

What Kennedy actually said during the speech was that governments today “are putting in place all these technological mechanisms for control that we’ve never seen before” and that “would be the ambition of every totalitarian state since the beginning of mankind, to control every aspect of behavior, of conduct, of thought, and to obliterate dissent.”

The point he was making about Jews hiding or fleeing over the mountains was that Nazi Germany did not have the technological capabilities that governments have today to surveil and control people’s behavior—which is obviously true.

Kennedy additionally mentioned having visited East Germany in 1962 with his father and meeting people who had escaped the communist regime by climbing over the Berlin Wall. “Today, the mechanisms are being put in place”, Kennedy immediately added, “that will make it so none of us can run and none of us can hide.”

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=joiLT2IT2qQ

Thus, contrary to false characterization from the New York Times and the Washington Post, Kennedy was not saying that what unvaccinated Americans experienced during the lockdowns was worse than what Jews faced during the Holocaust. He was instead simply emphasizing the need to fight the authoritarian governance because it set dangerous precedents, including implementation of “vaccine passport” systems that would prevent people from being able to travel unless they accepted COVID‑19 vaccination (even if those individuals already had superior natural immunity to SARS‑CoV‑2).

What Kennedy was rather expressing is that, if Americans don’t stand up and fight for their freedom, the government will continue escalating its violations of the US Constitution and fundamental human rights to such an extent that, at some point in the future, we will be living in a dystopian system of absolute totalitarian control over the population that, with technologies like satellite surveillance, central bank digital currencies, digital IDs, and vaccine passports, would be far beyond the control achieved by any totalitarian regime in history, including Nazi Germany.

Thus, we can see that Kennedy’s true offense was merely having criticized the lockdowns and coerced mass vaccination, and we can see how the New York Times and Washington Post choose to defend these criminal policies by twisting his words out of context with the intent to demonize any form of dissent from the totalitarian agenda.

The Threat of Genetically Targeted Bioweapons
As already noted, the second paragraph of the Times’ “Anguish in Camelot” article claims that Kennedy “suggested that the Covid‑19 virus had been engineered to protect Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people.”

Further into the article, the Times claims that Kennedy “declared that the coronavirus was ‘targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people’ and that ‘the people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.’”

Note closely which parts of that statement are a quote from Kennedy and which parts are the Times’ paraphrasing of what he said.

The Times adds, “He later said he was misinterpreted, writing on Twitter that the disparate effect of the virus ‘serves as a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons’ but ‘I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered.’”

“I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered.”
Thus, the Times characterizes Kennedy as a liar vainly attempting to deny having said something that he did in fact say.

The truth is that the Times is once again persisting in taking his statements out of context for the purpose of demonization.

To support the insistence that Kennedy did claim that the COVID‑19 vaccines are a bioweapon deliberately designed to spare Jews and Chinese, Baker cites a past Times article titled “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Airs Bigoted New Covid Conspiracy Theory About Jews and Chinese”. That article stated that “his suggestion that the coronavirus pandemic spared Chinese people and Jews of European descent strayed into new and bigoted territory. . . . And Mr. Kennedy’s remarks about Ashkenazi Jews hit antisemitic tropes on multiple levels.”

That article in turn cited a New York Post article from July 15 titled “RFK Jr. says COVID may have been ‘ethnically targeted’ to spare Jews”. The Post similarly asserted that “Kennedy’s remark echoes well-worn anti-Semitic literature blaming Jews for the emergence and spread of coronavirus”.

Usefully, the Post provides a video clip of Kennedy’s comments, which enables us to compare the media’s characterization with what Kennedy actually said. In doing so, we can see how the Times and the Post are both deliberately misrepresenting him.

Here is what Kennedy said:

And we need to talk about bioweapons. I know a lot now about bioweapons because I’ve been doing work on it for the past two-and-a-half years, and the technology that we now have to develop these microbes, we have hundreds of millions of dollars into ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing.

In fact, COVID‑19, there’s an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID‑19 attacks certain races disproportionately. The races that are most immune, because of the genetic differentials among different races, of the ACE2 receptor, COVID‑19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese.

We don’t know if it was deliberately targeted or not, but there are papers out there that show the racial and ethnic differential and the impact of that.

The first point to be made here is that Kennedy in no way suggested that Jews were responsible for creating and releasing SARS‑CoV‑2. Anyone familiar with Kennedy’s views on the question of the virus’s origins knows that he rather favors the hypothesis that the virus was the result of “gain of function” experiments done by researchers from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where the first outbreak of COVID‑19 occurred. For the Post to suggest that Kennedy was rolling out some anti-Semitic trope is totally dishonest. There is not a shred of truth to this accusation, which is demonstrative of moral and intellectual cowardice on the part of the so-called “journalists” leveling it.

The second point is that the idea that the virus was created in a lab is not a “conspiracy theory” but a legitimate scientific hypothesis. Indeed, evidence indicates that SARS‑CoV‑2, the coronavirus that causes COVID‑19, was created in a lab, and individuals involved in the “gain of function” research that appears to have resulted in the creation of this virus—including Dr. Anthony Fauci—have from the start of the pandemic sought to control the media narrative by dismissing any talk of a lab origin as a “conspiracy theory”.

For a time, Facebook even banned posts suggesting that the virus might have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where the outbreak first occurred.

Facebook even banned posts suggesting that the virus might have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where the outbreak first occurred.
The New York Times, of course, has consistently downplayed the lab origin hypothesis, such as by touting now-discredited research by a group of scientists claiming the virus likely leapt from raccoon dogs to humans at the Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market in Wuhan, which include several individuals who are known to have closely collaborated with Fauci to suppress discussion of a lab origin by publishing the now infamous commentary in Nature “The proximal origin of SARS‑CoV‑2”.

Earlier in the pandemic, the Times contributed to the propaganda campaign designed to deflect attention from the role of the US government in funding dangerous gain-of-function research by editorially endorsing the description of the idea that “the virus was engineered in a laboratory” as a “conspiracy theory”.

Since it became public how key players responsible for funding or participating in the research on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology sought to control the media narrative, the media have come to acknowledge—although they persist in trying to downplay—the possibility that SARS‑CoV‑2 was created in a lab.

The third point is that Kennedy did not say that the virus was created as a bioweapon, much less that it was deliberately created to spare certain races. His comments are rather consistent with the hypothesis that the COVID‑19 outbreak was the result of an unintentional escape from the lab as opposed to the virus having been deliberately released as a bioweapon.

He simply stated that an argument can be made that COVID‑19 disproportionately affects certain races due to differences in the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, which is the cell receptor with which the spike protein of the virus binds, which enables the virus to enter and replicate inside the cell.

Moreover, he explicitly stated that it wasn’t known whether these effects were an intentional result of engineering or not, so the media’s claim that he said that the virus was a bioweapon deliberately engineered to spare certain races is yet another bald-faced lie illustrating how they take his statements out of context for the purpose of demonization.

This once again proves the willingness of the New York Times and other major media outlets to deliberately fabricate a claim and falsely attribute it to RFK Jr.—yet another illustration of the media’s routine reliance on the strawman fallacy for the purpose of manipulating public perception in service to a clear political agenda.

The fourth point is that evidence does indicate that there are genetic factors in the pathogenesis of COVID‑19. For the media to deny this and dismiss the idea as somehow racist is utterly absurd.

As Kennedy clarified on Twitter on July 15 in response to the New York Post article:

The @nypost story is mistaken. I have never, ever suggested that the COVID-19 virus was targeted to spare Jews. I accurately pointed out — during an off-the-record conversation — that the U.S. and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons and that a 2021 study of the COVID-19 virus shows that COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect certain races since the furin cleave docking site is most compatible with Blacks and Caucasians and least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews. In that sense, it serves as a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons. I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered. That study is here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664879/

Post
See new Tweets
Conversation
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
@RobertKennedyJr
The
@nypost
story is mistaken. I have never, ever suggested that the COVID-19 virus was targeted to spare Jews. I accurately pointed out — during an off-the-record conversation — that the U.S. and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons and that a 2021 study of the COVID-19 virus shows that COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect certain races since the furin cleave docking site is most compatible with Blacks and Caucasians and least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews. In that sense, it serves as a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons. I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered. That study is here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664879/
9:46 AM · Jul 15, 2023
·
6.4M
Views

On July 16, the Kennedy campaign issued a statement correctly noting how the author of the New York Post article had engaged in dishonest strawman argumentation. “Levine is fabricating an opinion, attributing it to me, and trolling for scandal,” Kennedy said.

The media outlets propagating this lie about him remained unapologetic, opting to respond to his explicit clarification by persisting in the lie. Just as the New York Times dishonestly attempted to portray Kennedy’s Twitter post as a vain attempt to deny that he had parroted some anti-Semitic trope, the New York Post ludicrously portrayed it as “attempted damage control” for having dished out a “wild conspiracy”.

While acknowledging that Kennedy cited a study “that discussed genetic factors in the spread of the deadly bug”, the Post pretended as though the study did not support Kennedy’s statement by persisting that “there is no evidence that the virus was deliberately engineered to spare certain ethnic groups”—a repetition of the same deliberate strawman argument exposed by Kennedy in his tweet.

“Levine is fabricating an opinion, attributing it to me, and trolling for scandal.”
The authors of the study Kennedy cited reasonably hypothesized that human genetic factors may play a role in the pathogenesis of COVID‑19, so they “investigated genetic susceptibility to COVID‑19 by examining DNA polymorphisms” in ACE2 and the gene TMPRSS2, “two key host factors” determining susceptibility to SARS‑CoV‑2 infection. Their findings suggested that there was “unique genetic susceptibility across different populations”.

The Times article falsely accusing Kennedy of repeating anti-Semitic tropes acknowledged the existence of the study he was referencing but asserted that it “made no reference to Chinese people as less receptive to the virus” while acknowledging that “one particular receptor for the virus appeared not to be present in Amish and Ashkenazi Jews.”

The Times withholds the fact that the “one particular receptor” is the key cell receptor that the virus’s spike protein binds with in order to infect the cell.

Moreover, the study authors pointed out that East Asian as well as Ashkenazi Jewish populations “do not appear to carry” the “deleterious variants in ACE2” that they had identified. East Asia, of course, includes China, by far the largest country in that region and the second most populous country in the world with over 1.4 billion people.



Map of East Asia (Image by Koyos + Ssolbergj + Serg!o, licensed under GNU Free Documentation License)
The fact that the word “Chinese” doesn’t appear in the paper is thus a moot point, but it illustrates how the purpose of the Times is not to inform but to advance its own political agenda by senselessly demonizing Biden’s leading opponent for the Democratic nomination.

Other research has found that Ashkenazi Jews commonly express an ACE2 variant that has a higher binding affinity for the spike protein, suggesting increased susceptibility, but this study, too, supports Kennedy’s main point since the authors of that study agreed that genetic factors are “likely” involved in the pathogenesis of COVID‑19. The “substantially increased affinity” of certain ACE2 variants for the spike protein “raises the possibility that they could be risk factors for severe COVID‑19.”

A study in JAMA Network Open pointed out that there were many factors that might explain racial disparities in COVID‑19 outcomes, likely including genetic factors. On August 2, 2023, JAMA published an article providing “A Genetic Explanation for Why Some People Had Asymptomatic COVID‑19”, which cited a study in Nature finding an association between asymptomatic infection and a common allele of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA).

A search for “genetic susceptibility covid-19” at PubMed.gov, a database of the medical literature operated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), turns up hundreds of results. Selecting a few of the more obviously relevant ones, a study in the Lancet journal eBioMedicine in October 2021 stated that genetic predisposition to COVID‑19 “is now increasingly recognized”. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the journal Gene in August 2022 found that the evidence indicated genetic risk factors contributing to COVID‑19 susceptibility, including variations in ACE2 receptor. A review of the topic in Infection, Genetics and Evolution in June 2023 emphasized that “we are still in the need of better understanding the causal relationships between host genetics and COVID-19, in order to identify biomarkers for individuals at risk, as well as to provide potential targets for therapy.”

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, the founder of IPAK, published an article on July 17 pointing out the absurdity of the media attempting to characterize the observation that there are genetic risk factors as somehow bigoted or racist by citing two additional studies indicating that “host susceptibility variation is based on differences in ACE2 receptors.”

The fifth point to be made is that Kennedy is right to raise the alarm about the possibility of bioweapons being developed to target people based on their DNA. This is the key point that the Times stupidly deflects attention from with its libelous accusation that Kennedy is racist.

In October 2004, for instance, the British Medical Association (BMA) issued a report warning that the construction of genetically targeted bioweapons was “now approaching reality”.

In October 2005, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) issued a statement including the warning that “The potential to target a particular ethnic group with a biological agent is probably not far off.”

“The potential to target a particular ethnic group with a biological agent is probably not far off.”
In June 2008, the concern was raised in a hearing before the House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade that “We now need to add bioweaponry incorporating human genetic technology to our arms control portfolio.”

In April 2018, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP) published an article warning that governments could conceivably “edit the genes of a deadly virus so that it would affect only a single target based on his or her genetic code”. Advances in gene editing “could allow scientists to develop biological weapons capable of discriminating among target populations based on ethnic, racial, or other genetically defined characteristics.”

In August 2019, researchers from Cambridge University’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk published a report warning that biological weapons could be made to target specific ethnic groups.

In June 2022, at the Aspen Security Forum held by the Aspen Institute, Representative Jason Crow, a member of the House Committee on Armed Services and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, stated that

There are now weapons under development and developed that are designed to target specific people. Right? That’s what this is, where you can actually take someone’s DNA, take, you know, their medical profile, and you can target a biological weapon that will kill that person, or take them off the battlefield, or make them inoperable.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Q6hctxu3X8Q

While accusing Kennedy of echoing racist tropes by suggesting genetic risk factors for severe COVID‑19, the New York Post in July 2022 reported on Crow’s comments, adding that Senator Joni Ernst, who sat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, had “warned about US enemies intentionally spreading diseases and harming agriculture, in turn causing food scarcity.”

Instructively, there was nothing in that New York Post article suggesting that we should not take these warnings seriously, much less that we should dismiss them as racist tropes.

As accurately observed by Alex Gutentag and Michael Shellenberger of Public, a Substack publication that has producing real journalism (as opposed to what the mainstream media do), “there was nothing anti-Semitic about Kennedy’s remarks, nor did he say that the Chinese government deliberately targeted whites and blacks and spared Jews and Chinese people.”

On the contrary, “Kennedy is right to raise the alarm about China’s bioweapons program. And the debate over bioweapons research, which includes research into vaccines to protect against them, is long overdue.”

(Indeed, a major reason Dr. Anthony Fauci has long defended and supported gain of function research is to “facilitate the early stages of manufacturing vaccines” in the event of an outbreak of a novel virus.)

“We are deeply concerned about China’s potential ability to generate ethnically targeted products,” an anonymous source in the US intelligence community told Public. “And there are other countries with similar capabilities, such as Russia and Iran.”

“When discussing bioweapons,” a senior investigator in the US government said, “‘ethnic targeting’ is absolutely a goal that the Chinese government has declared. The CCP [Chinese Communist Party] markets ‘ethnic targeting’ with a positive spin for ‘public health.’ In public health arenas, ‘ethnic targeting’ becomes ‘precision medicine.’”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., it’s worth noting, has written a forthcoming book titled The Wuhan Cover-Up and the Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race, which is currently available for pre-order.

Bobby Kennedy was raising a serious concern about the threat of genetically targeted bioweapons. The New York Times, however, does not wish for serious discussions about important issues to occur. Instead, it aims to help Biden win the election by producing deceitful political propaganda to demonize Biden’s leading challenger for the Democratic nomination.

Conclusion
The New York Times’ “Anguish in Camelot” article goes on to say that RFK Jr.’s warning about genetically targeted bioweapons was “too much for several family members”, prompting scathing denunciations by his sister Kerry Kennedy and his brother Joseph P. Kennedy II, as well as his cousin Jack Schlossberg.

Most of the rest of the article goes on about how much the Kennedy clan loves Joe Biden.

This raises the question: Why are even members of Bobby Kennedy’s own family so susceptible to being duped by the mainstream media’s brazen lies about him?

The Times wants us to dismiss him as a “conspiracy theorist” for expressing the belief shared by most Americans as well as the 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations that the death of his uncle John F. Kennedy was not the work of a lone gunman but the result of a wider conspiracy.

The Times falsely suggests that Kennedy is among those who have spread the claim that COVID‑19 vaccines contain microchips, which is a deliberate misrepresentation of a meme he posted on Instagram humorously communicating a legitimate concern about the attempts by the powers-that-be to control our behavior, such as the movement toward central bank digital currencies and “social credit” systems, the debanking of people who speak out against medical tyranny, the development of digital IDs and even implantable microchips that will serve as people’s “passport for everything”, and coerced vaccination including “vaccine passports” aimed at penalizing individuals who decline these pharmaceutical products.

The Times accuses Kennedy of spreading misinformation for saying that the COVID‑19 vaccines have caused more deaths than any other vaccine in the past three decades, but it fails to address the legitimate points he made about the clinical trial data showing no mortality benefit and the alarming safety signal in VAERS data. The Times reveals its lack of seriousness on this topic, too, by using two virtually opposite descriptions of the utility of VAERS depending on the sole criterion of whether the data does or does not show a safety signal. Instructively, while rejecting Kennedy’s conclusion, the Times also declines to identify what other vaccine it is implicitly claiming has caused more deaths.

The Times falsely claims that Kennedy said that unvaccinated Americans during the lockdowns faced worse oppression than Jews living in Nazi Germany, which is a deliberate misrepresentation of what Kennedy said during his speech at the “Defeat the Mandates” rally—a strawman that, in addition to demonizing him, serves to deflect attention from the legitimate point he was making about the existential threat of authoritarian governance.

Finally, the Times falsely claims that Kennedy repeated an anti-Semitic trope by claiming that SARS‑CoV‑2 is a bioweapon deliberately engineered to spare Jews, yet another deliberate misrepresentation of his point about evidence indicating genetic risk factors in the pathogenesis of severe COVID‑19. Once again, in addition to demonizing Biden’s leading rival for the nomination, this misinformation serves to deflect from Kennedy’s legitimate point about the threat of genetically targeted bioweapons.

This case study illustrates the true function fulfilled by the New York Times and other mainstream outlets, which is not to do journalism but to generate dangerous political propaganda designed to manufacture consent for authoritarian and criminal government policies.

The fact that some of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s own family members believe the lies about him emanating from major media outlets like the New York Times serves as a remarkable testimony to the extraordinary effectiveness of such deceitful mainstream propaganda. "

[Eva2]

https://therebelpatient.substack.com...m_medium=email

'Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD cross-posted a post from The Rebel Patient™

Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
Aug 19 · Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
Karen Kingston is a friend. I have not heard from her in almost a month. If there is anyone who can help this effort to locate her and bring her safely home to her family, please help and share this information.

Family Statement on Missing Person Karen Kingston, August 18, 2023
DR MARGARET ARANDA
AUG 19

“Since Karen arrived in Mexico, we have maintained continuous communication with her since July 30, 2023. However, her last confirmed location was on August 9, 2023.

In light of recent information received by the family, we have taken the necessary steps to officially report Karen as a missing person in Mexico.

We appreciate your understanding as we collaborate with the appropriate authorities in our determined effort to locate Karen and ensure her safe return.

Our primary focus is on these profoundly concerning and all-encompassing endeavors. We commit to providing regular updates as we verify crucial information that adds to our understanding of the situation.

At this critical juncture, we kindly request your support in spreading awareness about Karen’s disappearance. We urge journalists, the public, and our extended networks to share her story, and provide any information that could aid in locating Karen.

Your overwhelming support has not gone unnoticed, and we are genuinely thankful for your ongoing prayers and appeals for Karen’s safe reunion with us.

Together, let’s bring Karen home.

We appreciate that Dr. Margaret Aranda will relay our official family communications.”

The official Missing Person’s Bulletin is below; the article with Karen’s timeline is here.

ACT NOW
ACT NOW! Help Us Get Karen Kingston Home: Official 'Missing Persons' Bulletin from Mexico
DR MARGARET ARANDA
·
AUG 18
ACT NOW! Help Us Get Karen Kingston Home: Official 'Missing Persons' Bulletin from Mexico
This is to confirm that Karen Kingston is missing. Please see below for the translation of the official bulletin, followed by more information. A statement from the family will follow shortly on Ron Kuchler’s Substack, seen below. This announcement is being translated to many languages. Constantly check back for updates.

Read full story
Thank you for caring, sharing, and praying for Karen.



Karen's Give.Send.Go.

Originally posted on
The Rebel Patient™
The Rebel Patient™
Dr Margaret Aranda

© 2023 Ana Mihalcea, MD, PhD
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104

[onawah]

Whistleblower Karen Kingston Missing
Family Statement on Missing Person Karen Kingston
August 18, 2023
From: Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD from Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD <anamihalceamdphd@substack.com
Sat, Aug 19, 2023

(Anyone not familiar with Karen Kingston's whistleblowing work, see: https://rumble.com/search/all?q=karen%20kingston

Greg Reese Report--Karen's a subject in Reese's most recent podcast at: https://gregreese.substack.com/p/oh-...=email#details
https://api.substack.com/feed/podcas...82eb21f332.rss
Dr. Robert Malone also comes up in the podcast in reference to Kingston, as well as the 12,000 year solar cycle/ geomagnetic pole reversal.
There was a comment from someone in the comment section of the Reese Report saying that Karen was found and is safe, but no confirmation of that as yet. )

“Since Karen arrived in Mexico, we have maintained continuous communication with her since July 30, 2023. However, her last confirmed location was on August 9, 2023.

In light of recent information received by the family, we have taken the necessary steps to officially report Karen as a missing person in Mexico.

We appreciate your understanding as we collaborate with the appropriate authorities in our determined effort to locate Karen and ensure her safe return.

Our primary focus is on these profoundly concerning and all-encompassing endeavors. We commit to providing regular updates as we verify crucial information that adds to our understanding of the situation.

At this critical juncture, we kindly request your support in spreading awareness about Karen’s disappearance. We urge journalists, the public, and our extended networks to share her story, and provide any information that could aid in locating Karen.

Your overwhelming support has not gone unnoticed, and we are genuinely thankful for your ongoing prayers and appeals for Karen’s safe reunion with us.

Together, let’s bring Karen home.

We appreciate that Dr. Margaret Aranda will relay our official family communications.”

The official Missing Person’s Bulletin is below; the article with Karen’s timeline is here.

ACT NOW! Help Us Get Karen Kingston Home: Official 'Missing Persons' Bulletin from Mexico
DR MARGARET ARANDA




This is to confirm that Karen Kingston is missing. Please see below for the translation of the official bulletin, followed by more information. A statement from the family will follow shortly on Ron Kuchler’s Substack, seen below. This announcement is being translated to many languages. Constantly check back for updates.

Read full story:https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/pr...395420705.heic

[Satori]

Posted by onawah (here)
Whistleblower Karen Kingston Missing
Family Statement on Missing Person Karen Kingston
August 18, 2023
From: Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD from Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD <anamihalceamdphd@substack.com
Sat, Aug 19, 2023

(Anyone not familiar with Karen Kingston's whistleblowing work, see: https://rumble.com/search/all?q=karen%20kingston

Greg Reese Report--Karen's a subject in Reese's most recent podcast at: https://gregreese.substack.com/p/oh-...=email#details
https://api.substack.com/feed/podcas...82eb21f332.rss
Dr. Robert Malone also comes up in the podcast in reference to Kingston, as well as the 12,000 year solar cycle/ geomagnetic pole reversal.
There was a comment from someone in the comment section of the Reese Report saying that Karen was found and is safe, but no confirmation of that as yet. )

“Since Karen arrived in Mexico, we have maintained continuous communication with her since July 30, 2023. However, her last confirmed location was on August 9, 2023.

In light of recent information received by the family, we have taken the necessary steps to officially report Karen as a missing person in Mexico.

We appreciate your understanding as we collaborate with the appropriate authorities in our determined effort to locate Karen and ensure her safe return.

Our primary focus is on these profoundly concerning and all-encompassing endeavors. We commit to providing regular updates as we verify crucial information that adds to our understanding of the situation.

At this critical juncture, we kindly request your support in spreading awareness about Karen’s disappearance. We urge journalists, the public, and our extended networks to share her story, and provide any information that could aid in locating Karen.

Your overwhelming support has not gone unnoticed, and we are genuinely thankful for your ongoing prayers and appeals for Karen’s safe reunion with us.

Together, let’s bring Karen home.

We appreciate that Dr. Margaret Aranda will relay our official family communications.”

The official Missing Person’s Bulletin is below; the article with Karen’s timeline is here.

ACT NOW! Help Us Get Karen Kingston Home: Official 'Missing Persons' Bulletin from Mexico
DR MARGARET ARANDA




This is to confirm that Karen Kingston is missing. Please see below for the translation of the official bulletin, followed by more information. A statement from the family will follow shortly on Ron Kuchler’s Substack, seen below. This announcement is being translated to many languages. Constantly check back for updates.

Read full story:https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/pr...395420705.heic

Good God, I hope this is not true. If it is, I pray for her safe return; Whatever the reason for her having gone into hiding and now, ostensibly, gone missing.

Ps. What is the source of this confirmation?

[onawah]

It would appear that the source of the report of Kingston missing was her own family.
But there is also a report that she is safe (from the comment on the Greg Reese Report), though that had not been confirmed the last time I looked.

Posted by Satori (here)

Good God, I hope this is not true. If it is, I pray for her safe return; Whatever the reason for her having gone into hiding and now, ostensibly, gone missing.

Ps. What is the source of this confirmation?

[onawah]

MRNA & Why It Matters
TOM RENZ
AUG 19, 2023
https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/mrna-and-why-it-matters

"This article is pretty science heavy so at this point I also want to acknowledge two additional points. First, I am not a Peter McCullough/Harvey Risch type scientist. I am a lawyer with some science background. That means that I am not the guy that will be creating science, but to do my job as an attorney litigating in this area I have to be able to read and understand the science. I do those things quite well. Second, the information in this article is based simply on reading and understanding the science. There is nothing here I’ve created - I just know how to read.

Disclaimers aside, I want to open this article with a confession. This article was titled using the acronym mRNA but that was intentionally misleading. For purposes of this article - mRNA actually stands for modRNA which is different from mRNA. mRNA is messenger RNA and is found all over in life. modRNA is laboratory modified RNA that has been synthetically created for a purpose. It can be more durable, and have substantially greater impact than a true mRNA and can do many other things.

Why does this matter? Well let’s start with the COVID “vaccines”. Because mRNA is a weak particle and breaks down easily with a relatively lower risk of messing with your genetics than other gene therapy products (like modRNA) that is what is always talked about in the jabs. The problem is that it is a lie. Here is the FDA label for the Pfizer jab:



You can find the entire label here: https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471. Note that different vials are different (denoted by the cap color) but also, under number 3, that one of the ingredients is modRNA. No one is talking about this but it is crucial.The human body is built on instructions carried in our genes. Here is a great summary of this info from NIH found here - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21134/:

Life as we know it is specified by the genomes of the myriad organisms with which we share the planet. Every organism possesses a genome that contains the biological information needed to construct and maintain a living example of that organism. Most genomes, including the human genome and those of all other cellular life forms, are made of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) but a few viruses have RNA (ribonucleic acid) genomes. DNA and RNA are polymeric molecules made up of chains of monomeric subunits called nucleotides.

To give you an idea of how complicated the genes that make up our body are this description from the same webpage follows:

The human genome, which is typical of the genomes of all multicellular animals, consists of two distinct parts (Figure 1.1):

*The nuclear genome comprises approximately 3 200 000 000 nucleotides of DNA, divided into 24 linear molecules, the shortest 50 000 000 nucleotides in length and the longest 260 000 000 nucleotides, each contained in a different chromosome. These 24 chromosomes consist of 22 autosomes and the two sex chromosomes, X and Y.

*The mitochondrial genome is a circular DNA molecule of 16 569 nucleotides, multiple copies of which are located in the energy-generating organelles called mitochondria.

*Each of the approximately 1013 cells in the adult human body has its own copy or copies of the genome, the only exceptions being those few cell types, such as red blood cells, that lack a nucleus in their fully differentiated state. The vast majority of cells are diploid and so have two copies of each autosome, plus two sex chromosomes, XX for females or XY for males - 46 chromosomes in all. These are called somatic cells, in contrast to sex cells or gametes, which are haploid and have just 23 chromosomes, comprising one of each autosome and one sex chromosome. Both types of cell have about 8000 copies of the mitochondrial genome, 10 or so in each mitochondrion.So think about how complex that makes us. The nuclear genome contains 3.2 billion nucleotides & the mitochondrial genome contains 16.5k. Each of these were designed by God and have evolved over the millennia to work as a singular machine. Now imagine a watch. The watch tells perfect time because a bunch of tiny gears all work perfectly together to move the hands the appropriate amount to point to the proper minutes and seconds. If one of these gears becomes damaged or the wrong size gear is put into place the entire watch would go haywire and fail to work. A watch may have hundreds of parts - our bodies have billions.

With that in mind let’s talk about modRNA (or worse - saRNA). Rather than taking my word for what this is let me share this explanation from Pfizer you can find at https://www.pfizer.com/science/innov...rna-technology until they change it (which will likely happen shortly after I publish this):



So Pfizer’s modRNA and saRNA vaccines modify the nucleosides that make up the genes that make up our body. Now consider this:



Windows 10 apparently has 50 million lines of code. Windows 11 has 60-100 million lines of code. Google has 2 billion lines of code. Each of these have more bugs in them than I can fathom as demonstrated by the fact that everyone that uses a computer spends half their time swearing at it. If we cannot make 50 million lines of codes work right why in the hell would we think we can insert random code into a product 3300 billion lines of code - many of which we do not fully understand - and not have problems?Understand that, at core, mRNA, modRNA, saRNA, etc. - these are all gene therapies and all about genetic manipulation. To suggest that this is high risk is an understatement. We have no idea what we are doing and yet we continue forward trying to control these genes.

I want to apologize but I do not want there to be any doubt that modRNA is all about gene editing so I have to point to some ugly “sciency” stuff. Let me start with this abstract from an article titled “Genome Engineering for Stem Cell Transplantation” you can find at https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.mesot2018.l34 (link to the full article is there as well). Here it is:

To avoid the ethical issues of embryonic stem cells, genome engineering has focused on inducible pluripotent stem cells, which can develop into all 3 germ layers. The ability to detect methylation patterns in these cells allows research into pluripotency markers. The recently developed CRISPR system has allowed widespread application of genome engineering techniques. The CRISPR-Cas9 system, a potent system for genome editing, can be used for gene knockout or knock-in genome manipulations through substitution of a target genetic sequence with a desired donor sequence. Two types of genome engineering can be initiated: homologous or nonhomologous DNA repair by the Cas9 nuclease. Delivery of the CRISPR-Cas9 and target donor vectors in human pluripotent stem cells can be accomplished via viral and nonviral delivery methods. Nonviral delivery includes lipid-mediated transfection and electroporation. It has become the most common and efficient in vitro delivery method for human pluripotent stem cells. The CRISPR-Cas9 system can be combined with inducible pluripotent stem cells to generate single or multiple gene knockouts, correct mutations, or insert reporter transgenes. Knockouts can also be utilized to investigate epigenetic roles and targets, such as investigation of DNA methylation. CRISPR could be combined with human pluripotent stem cells to explore genetic determinants of lineage choice, differentiation, and stem cell fate, allowing investigators to study how various genes or noncoding elements contribute to specific processes and pathways. The CRISPR-Cas9 system can also be used to create null or nucleasedead Cas9, which has no enzymatic activity but has been utilized through fusion with other functional protein domains. In conclusion, RNA-guided genome targeting will have broad implications for synthetic biology, direct perturbation of gene networks, and targeted ex vivo and in vivo gene therapy.

For those of you that are human and think this looks like hieroglyphics let me explain why it matters. This is all about using genetic modification of stem cells with various types of gene therapy. The discussion about delivery methods, what they want to do with DNA, and the use of RNA are all related to modifying human genetics. At some point this may become safe and effective but at present it is not even close. Further, note that the way this article talks about “RNA-guided genome targeting” and gene therapy meaning there is acknowledgement that all that we are seeing stems from the goal of controlling the human genome.Since the time of that 2019 article, “science” has advanced. We now have several years of modRNA experimentation on billions of people around the world via the COVID vaccines and the direction of this work has continued to evolve. In 2022 an article was published titled “Robust genome editing via modRNA-based Cas9 or base editor in human pluripotent stem cells“ that focused again on modifying our genetics using modRNA. That article, found at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9499999/, has the following summary:

CRISPR systems have revolutionized biomedical research because they offer an unprecedented opportunity for genome editing. However, a bottleneck of applying CRISPR systems in human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) is how to deliver CRISPR effectors easily and efficiently. Here, we developed modified mRNA (modRNA)-based CRIPSR systems that utilized Cas9 and p53DD or a base editor (ABE8e) modRNA for the purposes of knocking out genes in hPSCs via simple lipid-based transfection. ABE8e modRNA was employed to disrupt the splice donor site, resulting in defective splicing of the target transcript and ultimately leading to gene knockout. Using our modRNA CRISPR systems, we achieved 73.3% ± 11.2% and 69.6 ± 3.8% knockout efficiency with Cas9 plus p53DD modRNA and ABE8e modRNA, respectively, which was significantly higher than the plasmid-based systems. In summary, we demonstrate that our non-integrating modRNA-based CRISPR methods hold great promise as more efficient and accessible techniques for genome editing of hPSCs.

In English, this essentially describes how effective and efficient modRNA is at genome editing. Remember, all the COVID vaccines are gene therapy products and none are using natural mRNA. Instead each of these are toying with those 3300 billion lines of code that make humans work and we are just hoping that there are no unintended consequences.

I know this is complex and that there is a lot to consider but let me state this. The biochemical modifications that have been done to RNA have altered it substantially. These alterations were done for the purpose of allowing the use of these various RNA technologies to modify the human genome. In light of the complexity of the human genome we not only have no idea of the consequences I do not believe we can truly state what changes will ultimately be permanent and which will be temporary.Further, the “progress” in RNA tech has not only gone towards creating more effective methods of altering the makeup of humanity, it has also gone towards ensuring these gene therapies were more robust and lasted longer. While much of that discussion will be for another article, that is precisely the reason that they can now create foods that deliver gene therapy “vaccines” to people as well as other things (mosquitoes, aerosols, topicals, etc.).

The info above is quite clear. My research has been extensive and only a very small part of it is included here because most of the documents are so technical that they are nonsensical to people not used to reading them. That said, I challenge anyone to argue with what is here.

Our genomes are ours. These monsters are dead set on remaking humanity in an image that is not God’s and in doing so without people even knowing it’s happening - let alone consenting. I am not okay with this and while I understand that this may not make for a great talking point for our politicians on FOX it is foundational to humanity. The combination of the complexity of the topic and the bought off politicians makes this topic something many are afraid of but if we don’t deal with it we may just end up being remade into something we do not recognize."

[mountain_jim]

https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/st...-nor-effective

A Startling Compilation: 'Neither Safe Nor Effective'

BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, AUG 25, 2023 - 05:00 PM
Authored by Linda Weigenfeld via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),



A section of Dr. Colleen Huber’s introduction to her very important book, “Neither Safe Nor Effective 2nd Edition: The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines,” is worth quoting before looking at the book as a whole:

“Dr. Peter McCullough, an American cardiologist, called the COVID vaccines, ‘the worst pharmaceutical development idea in the history of mankind.’”

“It often comes as a surprise to people that mRNA-type medical interventions and coronavirus vaccines had plenty of red flags through their history prior to December 2020. The ingredients used were already known to be toxic: Cationic lipids injure the nervous system, lungs and liver, as well as cell membranes throughout the body. Polyethylene glycol was never used for injections, due to safety concerns. mRNA had already been shown to change DNA. Previous attempts at coronavirus vaccines had all failed and killed the test animals. So inflicting the world’s population with a new, mostly untested vaccine for which its components already had so many safety warnings was the most widespread reckless experiment in human history.”



Dr. Huber exposes the deaths, injuries, and the lack of desired results left in the wake of the COVID vaccines. She backs up her words with over 700 references to medical studies and government webpages.

A Little Background

Dr. Colleen Huber’s clinic in Tempe, Arizona, has provided cancer care by naturopathic physicians for its 16 years of existence. In 2014, Dr. Huber authored the largest and longest study in medical history on sugar intake in cancer patients.

Since the spring of 2020, Dr. Huber’s research interests have focused on the health hazards of masks and the COVID vaccines, as well as early treatments for COVID. As a medical expert in court cases related to vaccine safety concerns, she has, to prepare testimony for trials, compiled vital statistics, data from vaccine manufacturers, and other data from the United States and governments from around the world.

While parts of Dr. Huber’s book are quite technical and others unpleasant (to say the least), without access to a book with data such as this, the health of those receiving vaccines could be further jeopardized and lives lost. The documentation is complete and comprehensive, supporting Dr. Huber’s intention to expose the truth about the COVID vaccinations.



A Lack of Public Scrutiny

Dr. Huber discusses how the naïve public was required to allow Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson to inject substances on pure faith—without any scientific results backing up the company’s products.

Each of the manufacturers were inadequately scrutinized by the public prior to widespread use of the vaccines. Yet there was reason to thoroughly examine these companies. Pfizer had the distinction of paying the largest criminal fine in history for fraud, and Moderna had never produced anything before, much less a medical treatment. Johnson and Johnson had recently been convicted of asbestos contamination in its talcum powder. Thus, the three main manufacturers of the COVID vaccines each had a history that should have alarmed people.

There was also an assumption by the public that the vaccines would be better than the disease. Perhaps, in part, this assumption was due to a heavily financed and carefully choreographed COVID fear campaign.

Dr. Huber says that an emergency experimental vaccine cannot be assumed to be safer than a virus with a very high survival rate such as COVID.

Vaccine Side Effects

Dr. Huber documents the effects of COVID vaccinations. For example, the vaccine may cause blood clotting which can cause strokes, heart attacks, and pulmonary embolisms.

The vaccine turns the body into a spike-protein factory. These spike proteins then damage blood vessels and cells throughout the body, including cells in the heart.

Uveitis, an eye inflammation, is a common complaint within a few days following a COVID vaccination. This manifests as blurred vision, floaters, pain, redness and/or light sensitivity. Injuries to the retina and clouding of the vitreous humor (the clear gel that we see through) have also been reported.

By August 2022, data analyst Raimond Hagemann had compiled information on birth rate changes in 19 European countries and produced an extremely important paper. Nine months after the peak of COVID vaccinations, birth rates sharply declined and stayed down.

Cancers, especially aggressive cancers, have increased enormously since peak COVID vaccine uptake in spring of 2021.

Demyelinating disorders, that is, conditions that damage a layer of cells that protect the nerves, have been reported following the vaccinations. These include multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barre, seizures, encephalopathies, and encephalitis.



Other Chapters of Interest

Dr. Huber has a chapter giving a review of the immune system, and another explains why vaccines for respiratory diseases cannot work. There is also a chapter demonstrating with graphs that the more vaccines (boosters) a person receives, the more damage that can occur.

Offering suggestions for healing the vaccine injured, Dr. Huber adds the disclaimer that she cannot guarantee any of her advice will even partially heal the injured but some of it may prove effective in some cases. She mentions Vitamin D with its long and very successful history against viral infections, as well as agmatine, phosphatidyl serine, and nattokinase.

She also advises looking to Africa for solutions. Africa has been a beacon of light against an otherwise bleak global map. The continent has the distinction of having very little incidence and deaths from COVID when compared to the rest of the populated world. Africa also had an extraordinarily low vaccination rate. Instead, of vaccines, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been widely used throughout equatorial Africa for about a half century as they happen to be very useful against endemic parasites.

Dr. Huber includes a chapter on legal cases that are pertinent to bodily autonomy. She includes a link to each case, including some in which she was not involved, with quotes from each ruling judge.

She also talks about how to obtain religious and medical exemptions to COVID vaccines—providing a letter which asserts civil rights and supports bodily autonomy.

Speaking to the Author

Colleen Huber provided some insights as to why she wrote “Neither Safe Nor Effective.”



Fearing a pandemic may happen again, Dr. Huber worried about the almost blind acceptance of COVID vaccines. She hopes her book will help stop mandatory COVID vaccination for all people because one size does not fit all. The bodies of people are different and react in different ways to drugs, vaccines, and even food. Thus, she hopes her book will provoke second thoughts in those who are thinking of getting COVID injections in the future.

She also wants to dispense information that empowers people. By publishing her data now, she shows what happens when a government and social-media companies collude to stifle a free exchange of medical information. It’s become clear that problems with the COVID vaccines would have been easier to prevent before they were administered than to treat the problems they’ve created afterwards.

And, of course, she wants to provide resources to help the vaccine injured.

Dr. Huber’s reasons for her writing the book are the very reasons that you should buy the book. Knowledge is power.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/st...968138526?s=20

text

Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit
@drawandstrike
I can hear the sales pitch now:

"Unlike those OTHER vaccines we lied to ya about for 2 years that did not actually prevent ya from catchin' or spreadin' COVID, these NEW n' IMPROVED vaccines are AWESOME because they actually WORK to prevent you from catchin' COVID!

And its not like these new vaccines are really more mRNA gene therapy clot shots disguised as curative vaccines or anything like dat!"


https://twitter.com/MJTruthUltra/sta...777346419?s=20

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v395350

[mojo]

The pos biden/obama regime is back at it along with the rest of the evil cabal pushing another 'NEW" Covid poison and bringing back masks that dont work. That is the CRIME and to hell with our Constitutional rights!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Hk6KFgnLcaY

[mojo]

Sorry I'm getting more upset by the stupidity. Fox news is reporting this. So now they are talking about everyone has to take the shot.

Biden plans to ask Congress for funding to develop new COVID vaccine, may require shot for all

President Biden said Friday he plans to request additional funding from Congress for the development of a new COVID-19 vaccine, adding he may require everyone to take it, regardless of if they previously received a vaccine or not.

https://www.foxnews.com/health/biden...e-require-shot