Derek Johnson says Trump could still be the legal US President

[Pris]

.

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
The Sahra Westall interview is disappointing. I like Sarah, but it is very frustrating when a key point is ready to be made, such as Trump and the vaccines, and then Sarah interrupts, and they never quite return to the point. No one learns anything.
Terrible. And then on to nonsense about psychopaths . I gained nothing from this interview, and Sarah sounds like she knows less than many here at Avalon

As for Jen Halper, she sounds like she doesnt have sure footing. Either nervous, stepping in unknown territory, or not sure what she can say.
She also never mentioned working for the military.
Not discounting her info, but just saying

Posted by norman (here)
Doug, I agree about Sarah's stupid interruptions, I was yelling at her to STFU at one point myself, BUT, I think this interview is meant to be about the state of mind of the public and how to get a handle on it, not about the "Q" narrative and it's well trodden path.

I listened to the interview at 2x speed on the verge of a snooze and it sounded great to me. :D Sure, for the most part, it wasn't much of anything I didn't already know or suspect, but it was kind of nice to hear it from two ladies going back and forth confirming it for me. For instance, I thought the part about Trump and the vaccines was quite explanatory, how so many more people in the world would have died from starvation and so on had the shots not been pushed through during Trump's presidency to speed up the globalist's agenda (their plandemic which they intended to draw out for many, many years by holding off on any "treatment"...).

Maybe because I listened to the interview on fast speed, I didn't get any sense from Jan that she was uncertain of herself and it didn't sound like Sarah made any interruptions lol. And, the conversation seemed to flow around the state of mind of the public, yes. Then, with regard to analyzing psychopaths (though the perpetrators, in general, are not all necessarily psycho according to Jan), how they seem to always project their evil deeds onto others as a way to deflect from themselves (knowingly and/or unknowingly?) was just good to hear even if it's a bit of a rehash. We see constant examples of this projection. I think it's very much a childish trait and that's why I think it throws off "normal-thinking" adult people when it comes from seemingly trustworthy adult "authority figures" because it's entirely incongruous. In other words, "normies" cannot comprehend they are constantly being lied to. It's impossible for "normies" to believe that the people they've learned to trust are pathological liars. (What that suggests about those of us who can figure it out... has something to do with being able to rationalize. Example: when words don't match actions, we distrust and question immediately.)

Also, how many psychopaths are actually in the population... I thought that was interesting -- 1 in 100,000... if I got this right, that means there's about 80,000 psychopaths in the world population of 8 billion... (Side note: I'd guess that inherited genes [from psychos] runs heavier in certain family lines noting that it probably skips some offspring entirely... Has to make you wonder how/why/where it originated... Complete lack of empathy? Sounds about right to me.). It's good to try to figure out what makes a psycho tick and why people fall for them. Being able to identify psychos thusly is how we can protect ourselves and others in order to avoid becoming their victims. Invaluable.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Pris (here)
Also, how many psychopaths are actually in the population... I thought that was interesting -- 1 in 100,000... if I got this right, that means there's about 80,000 psychopaths in the world population of 8 billion...

I think it's way more than 1 in 100,000. According to forensic psychologist Robert D. Hare the figure is closer to 1 in a 100.

Hare reports that about 1 percent of the general population meets the clinical criteria for psychopathy. Hare further claims that the prevalence of psychopaths is higher in the business world than in the general population. Figures of around 3–4% have been cited for more senior positions in business. A 2011 study of Australian white-collar managers found that 5.76 percent could be classed as psychopathic and another 10.42 percent dysfunctional with psychopathic characteristics.

[source]

That would equate to about 85 million psychos in the world, or people in possession of psychopathic traits. Tack on to this the approximate estimate that 1 in 25 are sociopaths, and the timeless idiom that "s**t always floats to the top" [see example of the business world cited above], you have the perfect recipe for the totally f****d up world we have.

[JackMcThorn]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

Posted by Pris (here)
Also, how many psychopaths are actually in the population... I thought that was interesting -- 1 in 100,000... if I got this right, that means there's about 80,000 psychopaths in the world population of 8 billion...

I think it's way more than 1 in 100,000. According to forensic psychologist Robert D. Hare the figure is closer to 1 in a 100.

Hare reports that about 1 percent of the general population meets the clinical criteria for psychopathy. Hare further claims that the prevalence of psychopaths is higher in the business world than in the general population. Figures of around 3–4% have been cited for more senior positions in business. A 2011 study of Australian white-collar managers found that 5.76 percent could be classed as psychopathic and another 10.42 percent dysfunctional with psychopathic characteristics.

[source]

That would equate to about 85 million psychos in the world, or people in possession of psychopathic traits. Tack on to this the approximate estimate that 1 in 25 are sociopaths, and the timeless idiom that "s**t always floats to the top" [see example of the business world cited above], you have the perfect recipe for the totally f****d up world we have.

I'm not sure it is that high because the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath is the ability to conduct violence and includes inflicting death. A psychopath is more prone to conducting violence and a sociopath is more of a psychological abuser and not prone to conducting physical violence. Therefore there would be far more incidents of violence among the population if there were a prevailing feature of psychopaths in the millions. Serial killers in america are quite rare this past 2o or 3o years. In Ireland there is a typical story of someone using an axe on another person, or there was one story of a lady who chopped someone up and left them in garbage bags by a river, but these stories are a few times a year regarding a population of about 5 million with another couple million in Northern Ireland. These types of cases are going to be reported because they are hard to get away with in the modern era, although I am sure some get missed. But psychological abuse is rampant and tens of thousands of these cases are indeed unreported. This leads me to believe that real, actual psychopaths are extremely rare and the term is just used loosely and many times out of context.

There is a bit of a story that is supposed to test someone if they are indeed a psychopath.

There is a lady who's mother has passed away and she is attending the funeral. She meets a man at the funeral who she never met before and who she is interested in, but fails to ask him for his number. What does she do to meet him again?

They indicate that if you answer this correctly, you might have psychopathic tendencies but I wouldn't take it too seriously.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Pris (here)
Also, how many psychopaths are actually in the population... I thought that was interesting -- 1 in 100,000... if I got this right, that means there's about 80,000 psychopaths in the world population of 8 billion...

Hello, everyone, just stepping in here briefly. (Yes, I read all the posts! )

The proportion is far more, according to many published clinical opinions. Here's just one:

About 1.2% of US adult men and 0.3% to 0.7% of US adult women are considered to have clinically significant levels of psychopathic traits.

That puts the number of potential psychopaths in the world at 80 million. (!)

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by JackMcThorn (here)
I'm not sure it is that high because the difference between a psychopath and a sociopath is the ability to conduct violence and includes inflicting death. A psychopath is more prone to conducting violence and a sociopath is more of a psychological abuser and not prone to conducting physical violence. Therefore there would be far more incidents of violence among the population if there were a prevailing feature of psychopaths in the millions.

I wasn't referring specifically to psychopaths in the general population.

I was talking about in the control structures. I was talking about the mental/spiritual/energy states of the elite, the puppet masters, the hidden hand(s) that command our civilization, that steers, drives, and conducts its political, economic, and social 'development' across every sector of society, and worldwide. And then the millions of their sociopathic minions, the say-so middle-management, or bureaucracy, that operate beneath them and do their will. By and large the 'politicians' -- and diplomats, judges, economists, and banksters; corporations, think-tanks, educational bodies, police bodies, regulatory bodies, security agencies, intelligence agencies, mobsters, tycoons -- the entire rotten shebang, in other words the 'the powers that be'.

As I said, "s***t floats to the top".

[BMJ]

The Greatest Show On Earth 2023

Class 101 on Laws & Orders by Goodlion.tv- The video breaks down the chronological history and implementation of the laws and orders.

On the hot topic of the moment EO13848, go to 46 minutes into the video.

Link: https://www.goodlion.tv/?fbclid=IwAR...=comp-lii68e5d

[JackMcThorn]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

I wasn't referring specifically to psychopaths in the general population.

I was talking about in the control structures. I was talking about the mental/spiritual/energy states of the elite, the puppet masters, the hidden hand(s) that command our civilization, that steers, drives, and conducts its political, economic, and social 'development' across every sector of society, and worldwide. And then the millions of their sociopathic minions, the say-so middle-management, or bureaucracy, that operate beneath them and do their will. By and large the 'politicians' -- and diplomats, judges, economists, and banksters; corporations, think-tanks, educational bodies, police bodies, regulatory bodies, security agencies, intelligence agencies, mobsters, tycoons -- the entire rotten shebang, in other words the 'the powers that be'.

As I said, "s***t floats to the top".

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Sounds like general population here in this suggestion:

I think it's way more than 1 in 100,000. According to forensic psychologist Robert D. Hare the figure is closer to 1 in a 100.

Hare reports that about 1 percent of the general population meets the clinical criteria for psychopathy. Hare further claims that the prevalence of psychopaths is higher in the business world than in the general population. Figures of around 3–4% have been cited for more senior positions in business. A 2011 study of Australian white-collar managers found that 5.76 percent could be classed as psychopathic and another 10.42 percent dysfunctional with psychopathic characteristics.

[source]

That would equate to about 85 million psychos in the world, or people in possession of psychopathic traits. Tack on to this the approximate estimate that 1 in 25 are sociopaths, and the timeless idiom that "s**t always floats to the top" [see example of the business world cited above], you have the perfect recipe for the totally f****d up world we have.

I don't mean to be petty but your first message doesn't mention anything about 'the powers that be'. My message wasn't personal, Mark. Even the statistics about business people in my mind are incorrect because there is no prevalence of violence or death, which I think is a key feature of a psychopath. They are pretty much all sociopaths. Sociopaths with soft office hands. A real psychopath is someone like Ed Gein or Dahmer and these are not prevailing personalities. They are distinct and extremely rare [and not to mention, disgusting].

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by JackMcThorn (here)
Even the statistics about business people in my mind are incorrect because there is no prevalence of violence or death, which I think is a key feature of a psychopath.

But it isn't. The key features of a psychopath are a tendency to egotistical traits, and anti-social behaviour, while exhibiting impaired empathy and lack of remorse or guilt. This according to Development and Psychopathology, a peer-reviewed medical journal. In 1993, psychologist Robert Hare wrote:

Psychopaths are social predators who charm, manipulate, and ruthlessly plow their way through life, leaving a broad trail of broken hearts, shattered expectations, and empty wallets. Completely lacking in conscience and in feelings for others, they selfishly take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without the slightest sense of guilt or regret.

Researchers have noted, and I quote, "psychopathy is dissociable from and not synonymous with violence."

Psychopathy in the workplace is a well-understood phenomenon. It manifests in the domain of self-serving ruthlessness, and in manipulation, character-assassination, sabotaging others, spying on others, bullying others, sexually harassing others, blackmailing others, and the list goes on. You don't get to succeed, and therefore rise to the top, by being violent. The psychopath is more cunning than that.

In 2011, psychologist Kevin Dutton conducted a study that concluded that the Top profession to have the highest number of psychopaths was:

CEO

Lawyers came second, media people third.

[thepainterdoug]

PRIS

You may have something there. listen to it at 2x the speed!
I think i got this feeling about her not being sure footed from not only this inteview but the other I saw with the british stuffed shirt. She appeared nervous.
And as I said, I like Sarah, but right when Jan was going to speak about Trump and the vaccines, that damn interruption.!

So now we have the continuation of EO 13848. Why would this be continued from Sleepy Joes poin to view?

[Ratszinger]

Probably because as long as there is an 'Emergency' Joe can send troops to respond to it much as George Bush did with Iraq and Bill Clinton before that when he ordered the bombing of Yugoslavia.The War Powers Resolution often referred to as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 does indeed exist but not as an "Act" as Derek refers to it all as all the time.. It is a law actually so there must be something in writing in the way of a document that proposed the bill to make that law. It is a law intended to check the U.S. president's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of the U.S. Congress.
The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States congressional joint resolution. It provides that the president can send the U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization", or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces".
Calling it an act may not be the correct term for it but people saying it doesn't exist because of that like they do to Derek on X all the time isn't quite accurate either.
Key note that when Clinton did it they called it abuse of the law and when Bush did it they calle dit abuse of the law also. They would likely do the same with Joe but he would still do it.

[Pris]

.

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
PRIS

You may have something there. listen to it at 2x the speed!
I think i got this feeling about her not being sure footed from not only this inteview but the other I saw with the british stuffed shirt. She appeared nervous.
And as I said, I like Sarah, but right when Jan was going to speak about Trump and the vaccines, that damn interruption.!

So now we have the continuation of EO 13848. Why would this be continued from Sleepy Joes poin to view?

About Jan appearing nervous? Somewhat, perhaps? Maybe that's because she's not comfortable in the public eye. Not everyone loves to be on camera. Besides, she does seem to KNOW things and she's being careful (comes across as hesitant) not to say too much. That can just mean she's being smart. She's... a psychologist, apparently. One thing's for sure, she seems to be very aware of the importance of words/communication.

I'd like for someone to ask Jan to explain why she came out publicly in 2016 (like on the fake news BBC) saying she thought Trump was "out of control" and "psychologically unbalanced' and was very concerned about it because he was running as a presidential nominee. Now, that's suspicious. But, again, there must certainly be players in this "movie" with roles to "make Trump look bad", gain the trust of a certain segment of the population, then later on switch sides as an effective strategy to wake people up. When you're trying to wake people up out of their "mass formation psychosis" (which Jan seems to be an expert on), this may indeed be an effective strategy. If anyone knows about 5th generation warfare, I'm sure it's Jan. So, I'm watching her carefully, regardless. Trump recently approved of her "viral" interview and said she's fantastic. I think that's very interesting.

I watch lots of videos on 2x speed now, definitely saves time and it's like being in "The Matrix" getting a brain download.

So, from Sleepy Joe's point-of-view, the extension of EO 13848... He (as the real Biden or an actor) either knows exactly what's going on (and only pretends to be a vegetable in public) and is quietly signing it on purpose to help Trump... or he knows absolutely nothing about it. Perhaps, the real Biden (held/imprisoned somewhere) is signing it to help Trump, or someone else is secretively signing it with Biden's signature to help Trump.

It's impossible to nail down what Sleepy Joe's point-of-view is -- especially if the guy is just an actor pretending to be Biden. From all outward appearances, he seems to be on a mission to wake people up lol. If so, you have to wonder why the other swamp creatures haven't taken him out yet knowing he's working for the "white hats" and undermining their operation. This suggests the other swamp creatures are also playing roles to help the "white hats" to wake everybody up. Trump did put out a video at least a couple of times that showed "The Swamp" had already SUBMITTED.

Link to video showing "THE SWAMP SUBMITTED". Start at 4:20:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1562256

Posted by Pris (here)
I agree with you that we're watching a "show". With regard to that extension of Executive Order 13848, "Biden" is either absolutely key to this and knowingly signing it for the benefit of CIC Trump or "Biden" has no clue and someone else is making sure the order gets extended for the benefit of CIC Trump. Either way, it looks entirely coordinated... as in a Plan to help Trump.

[T Smith]

Posted by Pris (here)

I'd like for someone to ask Jan to explain why she came out publicly in 2016 (like on the fake news BBC) saying she thought Trump was "out of control" and "psychologically unbalanced' and was very concerned about it because he was running as a presidential nominee. Now, that's suspicious.

She does address this a couple of times in a couple of interviews. Something about a behind-the-scenes struggle with the RNC and Reince Priebus early on, when Priebus was trying handle Trump and/or convince him to drop out. Once Trump snapped that yoke and broke free, her opinion of his behavior changed, i.e., when she understood the greater context of what was going on, Trump's contextual behavior made sense to her and she changed her mind about him.

You can listen to her explanation here, at the 36 minute mark. In another interview (can't remember which one) she explains herself in even more detail.

Bottom line: I have no problem with it. If anything, it makes her more real to me. People (especially real/genuine people) are entitled to evolve and change their minds...

[thepainterdoug]

T Smith , Thanks and I agree. There is no reason an intelligent person cannot re evaluate things once new or updated info has been discovered.

I was starting to think that with 13848 running out, the big operation would have to happen prior to it doing so. But as I see things, Trump now has more time and will let these so called indictments proceed with the ability to bring his own evidence. All this as these prosecutors are being put under more scrutiny.

This all has an interesting play window. I dont feel there will be any EBS happening for a while if ever. Little by litte everyday, Biden looks worse,( hard to believe that could happen) and Trump gains in popularity.

This Maui thing was really bad, as more and more of our money goes to Ukraine. People are seeing this.

[Pris]

.

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Pris (here)

I'd like for someone to ask Jan to explain why she came out publicly in 2016 (like on the fake news BBC) saying she thought Trump was "out of control" and "psychologically unbalanced' and was very concerned about it because he was running as a presidential nominee. Now, that's suspicious.

She does address this a couple of times in a couple of interviews. Something about a behind-the-scenes struggle with the RNC and Reince Priebus early on, when Priebus was trying handle Trump and/or convince him to drop out. Once Trump snapped that yoke and broke free, her opinion of his behavior changed, i.e., when she understood the greater context of what was going on, Trump's contextual behavior made sense to her and she changed her mind about him.

You can listen to her explanation here, at the 36 minute mark. In another interview (can't remember which one) she explains herself in even more detail.

Bottom line: I have no problem with it. If anything, it makes her more real to me. People (especially real/genuine people) are entitled to evolve and change their minds...

Thank you for sharing that! That's explains it, makes sense. I agree, people are certainly entitled to change their minds especially when -- unbeknownst to them -- they don't have the full picture to begin with and only find out later what was really going on.

[norman]

IF anyone here hasn't yet had enough of getting inside Jan Halper Hayes' mind, I've found an old and British podcast interview with her from 15th of February 2018.

It's a revealing listen. She says a lot about herself and her opinions on Trump and politics, at a time when the spotlight wasn't on her as it is now. Her criticism of Trump being potentially unbalanced gets a mention too and she says more about it than she did in the recent interviews.

The Political Party - 58 - Dr Jan Halper-Hayes 2018-02-15

[Pris]

.

Posted by BMJ (here)
The Greatest Show On Earth 2023

Class 101 on Laws & Orders by Goodlion.tv- The video breaks down the chronological history and implementation of the laws and orders.

On the hot topic of the moment EO13848, go to 46 minutes into the video.

Link: https://www.goodlion.tv/?fbclid=IwAR...=comp-lii68e5d

This was SUPER, BMJ! Really fantastic show! Just finished watching it, wow... Does it ever explain everything well! "Based on the work of Derek Johnson"! Where all the Executive Orders come into play, important events and the dates, correlations between events... And, it really shows it all in chronological order, with explanations of "why" certain events happened when they did, bringing us to where we are right now. The careful review of what Trump accomplished was awe inspiring -- especially with the submission of multiple nation's leaders to him... the symbolism carefully explained, so excellent. And, whoever added all the music to this show has absolutely great taste!



Under Pressure by Queen And David Bowie


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q4QcDkEZwsAE

[norman]

Posted by norman (here)



Sarah Westall - Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes (1of2) - Is the American Public Ready for the Change Coming?
49 minutes Posted Sep 8, 2023


SHOW NOTES
Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes, change management expert, psychologist and Worldwide Vice President of Republicans Overseas, joins the program to discuss the mental state of the American people. She has been tasked by the Department of Defense and the Trump administration to gauge where people are at and what it will take to awaken the people to what is really going on within the country and world. Not an easy task, but one worth doing. You can follow Dr. Jan on her Substack at https://DrJan.Substack.com.

Sarah Westall - Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes (2of2) - Is the American Public Ready for the Change Coming?
55 minutes - Posted Sep 10, 2023

[Ratszinger]

I've watched "The Greatest Show On Earth" and listened to Dr Jan twice. All were very interesting, Convincing in many parts but leaving serious questions after at least for me. I guess the point of contention I have is how we are supposed to trust the military to get us out of this when apparently it has been military intelligence behind all of this including COVID19 and the bi0-lab funding in Ukraine and China as well as in the USA. Wasn't it also through military channels in gov. that Chapel Hill NC got their exemption to continue working on their SARs2 weapon? So the military is fighting our own military deep state that has worked above the law in secret since at least Eisenhower days? This is pretty far out there stuff guys. Its a nice fantasy I admit. I'd love it to be true. I hope it is. Pray it is actually but and that is the problem none of this hopium has removed that "BUT" for me. It is good to get into the heads of those following Trump to know what they see tho and for that and the talking points it will provide in the future I am grateful. Thanks for posting it.

[Pris]

.

Posted by Ratszinger (here)
I've watched "The Greatest Show On Earth" and listened to Dr Jan twice. All were very interesting, Convincing in many parts but leaving serious questions after at least for me. I guess the point of contention I have is how we are supposed to trust the military to get us out of this when apparently it has been military intelligence behind all of this including COVID19 and the bi0-lab funding in Ukraine and China as well as in the USA. Wasn't it also through military channels in gov. that Chapel Hill NC got their exemption to continue working on their SARs2 weapon? So the military is fighting our own military deep state that has worked above the law in secret since at least Eisenhower days? This is pretty far out there stuff guys. Its a nice fantasy I admit. I'd love it to be true. I hope it is. Pray it is actually but and that is the problem none of this hopium has removed that "BUT" for me. It is good to get into the heads of those following Trump to know what they see tho and for that and the talking points it will provide in the future I am grateful. Thanks for posting it.

Lol! It really wasn't so bad "getting into our heads" now, was it? ;D

[BMJ]

Posted by BMJ (here)

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
Mountain Jim and friends.
Pris is the only one who I shared this with a while ago.
What I say is credible. I have been invited to Trumps Bedminster golf course many times. I was a guest for the screening of , The Sound of freedom.
Here am I with the wonderful Kari Lake and Jim Caviesel . I share this only so you know this is truthful. Although it could be greenscreen! lol

I have a friend who directly asked D J T, are we in Cog, are you the CIC? His answer was yes. Just stay calm. everything is going to be ok.

Many know. Its not a secret. It just seems to be a secret among the sleepers

I'm inspired by Doug's post to share this with you guys, I wasn't going to because I didn't want it to seem like I was bragging.

The fact is they say they have it all, they " literally " have everything they know who are the good guys out there that support this movement no matter whom you are.

In Australia, recently we had the Talisman Sabre exercise which is a huge military exercise with 30,000 soldiers held biennial primarily up north and well away from major cities.

I live down south in Sydney's western suburbs which is highly populated and well away from all the action, at least 2,000km away, and really a no fly zone for that reason.

I know the flight routes of aircraft in my area because I am a keen observer of aircraft.

Recently, I was shown a bit of support over the last month, one occasion I had a flight of three Taipan helicopters fly directly over my house at only 200 feet if that going south.
Another day I stepped out to go shopping and was walking down my driveway and had a P-8 Poseidon fly straight up my driveway at a height going east to west, very good timing.
Lastly I came back from a day out with my best friend and as we reached the porch a US Chinook flew by parallel to our driveway which is quite long then the Chinook peeled off going south maybe at yet again 200 feet.

None of those helicopters or aircraft had a reason to do this, it's out of the way.

Similiar to what Rick Bossi and other guys had retold, the military are showing us their support. They know who we are and they have our backs.

This Chinook was olive drab in colour had inflight refueling probe and large fuel tanks and wasn't a Aussie Chinook which has none of these attributes.

UPDATE 25.8.23 - This US Chinook was was operating off Queensland about 1,000km north of Sydney at about the time I saw that Chinook and it looks very similar to what I saw.

This United States Army MH-47G Chinook helicopter from 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Night Stalkers) prepares to land on the Royal Australian Navy ship HMAS Adelaide during Exercise Balance Action 2023 off the Queensland coast on 25th July 2023.

Link: https://images.navy.gov.au/Home/Sear...&Type=Filename

Looks like DJ also had a Chinook do a flyby parallel to his driveway just coming by to say hello and show some support. (And the video just happens to be 17 seconds long, ThankQ )

Quote:
" Out in the country in Tennessee nowhere near Clarksville coming from Alabammer 😎
Wait for it… some hillbilly bumpkin from Oklahoma will say she took this 6 years ago… 🥁
Just happened, not on radar 💯🇺🇸 "