copying here
copying here
I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson
The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)
(avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)
BMJ (12th December 2023), BushPilot (10th December 2023), ClearWater (10th December 2023), edina (10th December 2023), jaybee (10th December 2023), mojo (17th December 2023), Pris (10th December 2023), pyrangello (11th December 2023), Yoda (10th December 2023)
.
.
I think the following has some relevancy to this thread:
Posted by Pris (here)
.
Posted by Pris (here)
.
.
Elon Musk: The people have spoken and so it shall be.
Link includes an interesting comment section:
https://patriots.win/p/17rmSqhn2D/el...spoken-and-/c/
These two comments really caught my eye... I think the reply is right on (notwithstanding the so-called "public opinion" being so easy to manipulate):
A_Little_bitter
I love this because it is not like he just decided to bring him back. It was a twitter poll that everyone can vote on. So anyone who has a problem with this has a problem with democracy.
Reply:
TheOutlawPepeWales
I have a problem with our liberty and civil rights being predicated on public opinion. F*ck democracy.
Note: I'm thinking the real percent was closer to 80/20 or even 90/10 because of how the poll appeared at the beginning. It looks like the "Left" (with their Twitter-bots, multiple accounts...) didn't get the time they needed to include enough of their fake ballots lol.
.
I'm guessing there's a plan behind why Alex Jones is finally being brought back now... Timing is everything.
I thought it would be good to share a little reminder of why it's beneficial to have Alex Jones back:
(Off-topic: Alex Jones wasn't the only one to "predict" 9/11. But, the detail he shares in this old video from July of 2001 makes me wonder if he's a "white hat" [Elon Musk, too] whose function was and is to get information out into public awareness ahead of time in an informational "drip-drip-drip" counter-psyop to the Deep State's agenda.)
.
Last edited by Pris; 11th December 2023 at 00:22.
Blacklight43 (9th January 2024), BMJ (12th December 2023), mojo (17th December 2023), mountain_jim (11th December 2023), pyrangello (11th December 2023), Yoda (18th December 2023)
Recent gem from sleepydude: https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/kingmaker
In case you're unaware, sleepydude is without question the best big picture writer on this sort of stuff. Not mindless hype or analyzing current events, but really giving big picture on how comms work and how the whole system runs and breaking down specific comms a la decodingsymbols.wordpress.com but in a different style.
Here's another recent post of his on comms: https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/comms-integrity
There was a very productive comment thread on the post linked above. Direct link to comment back-and-forth -- https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/co...mment/44494046 -- and I will copy/paste the first questions and reply:
----
FANTASTIC WRITEUP. Thank you. The guy over at decodingsymbols.wordpress.com got me interested in this but your writing has really given me the essential holistic understanding, especially this article.
Question for you, if you have a minute. You've helped me understand how the symbolism is present, but I've wondered as to how some of these clown articles are applied. How exactly do seemingly very general comms prompt action from a certain individual or group? How is it useful to the person putting the comms out? Or are a lot of them just general communications -- in other words, the owner of the publication communicating to the cabal at large?
I guess I can see how "Biden's dog bit someone again" could be directly useful, as it lets people know that Biden's personal assistant did something (or something of that nature) and if you knew what was up then you'd know why that's important... but are clowns really going to know about the dealings of Biden's personal assistant? How do you get value from this comm without extreme insider info?
I guess maybe it's just a matter of me not really understanding the full picture? But wouldn't the clowns not see the full picture either? Or maybe if you understood every comm, you'd immediately see when a certain clown article applies to you? And I guess certain clowns know to focus on certain publications to look for comms? Just seems like some of the clown articles are really short.
Hope that made sense, no need to answer every question of course, just trying to put the finishing touches on my understanding of the concept. Have read all of your posts and may have missed it somewhere.
---
REPLY...
"How exactly do seemingly very general comms prompt action from a certain individual or group? How is it useful to the person putting the comms out? "
That depends on the group and the message. Some Comms have several layers of cryptographic scrambling going on, like the first letters of each sentence being part of a message. Only the two coordinating the message can know the meaning there.
Others are pretty damn blatant for orders that absolutely cannot be misinterpreted. The horse article I linked to, for example, with the Helicopters is straight up a call to all BLM handlers to cut loose and run. No more BLM(Bureau of Land Management) funding(leafy greens). No more instructions(water). "If you dare try to pull more crap we will send in the helicopters." It was a call to END the BLM and Antifa riots that surrounded the 2020 election. In short, the article told all the BLM handlers "your services are no longer required." Soros probably put out that article, so it had to go far and wide.
I like using the article as an example, because it is very blatant and demonstrates the themes perfectly with the BLM tie in.
"Or are a lot of them just general communications -- in other words, the owner of the publication communicating to the cabal at large?"
It used to be ONLY sensitive information would be sent in Comms posts. There was a time where most articles weren't fake news and clown articles. That time has long since passed, and MOST articles have some sort of Comms conscriptions tied to them. Some might be as simple as asking somebody to pick up some paper towels. They've gotten so spoiled with getting away with it, some use it instead of other messaging systems just because they're used to it and feel special when they do it. Definitely a power trip situation. It's not entirely problematic at first glance either, and I suspect using the Comms system was even encouraged for literal nonsense and frivolous messages just to throw more noise into the system. If you pump a whole lot of "flares" out, the enemy's missiles have less of a chance of hitting you. Some of these stupid articles might just be encoded with Comms, but they go nowhere just to keep White Hats guessing. The same is done in other forms of cryptographic messaging too.
Really, unless you're linked to a particular post from your "boss" through e-mail, or have a schedule where you're expected to check a publication every other day, most Comms articles deal with stuff only the sender and receiver can use. That's just how it is with most business orders, encoded or not.
"but are clowns really going to know about the dealings of Biden's personal assistant? How do you get value from this comm without extreme insider info?"
It's useful to know if someone's personal assistant is temperamental or not. Chances are the dog Comms for Biden's PA are to instruct people coming to try to get in contact and make a deal with the "Big Guy" that their own efforts to do so were met with hostility. In other words, "if you wanna talk to Joe's PA to make a deal, this might not be the best time." Secretaries and Personal Assistants can get bogged down with work and are likely to snap at people every now and again. If they've got a lot on their plate, the "dog" might just bite you for coming close at a bad time. It's useful to most people to know that. The value in the message will only help people who already have access that particular PA.
"But wouldn't the clowns not see the full picture either? Or maybe if you understood every comm, you'd immediately see when a certain clown article applies to you? And I guess certain clowns know to focus on certain publications to look for comms?"
Everything is compartmentalized and on a need-to-know basis. Even so, many people are nosey by nature, especially when they're paranoid mafia types. Some people in the Cabal probably just read these articles because they get a kick out of it like a gossip board. They can't do anything with the information, like most news, but they like to feel informed. The "Fear Of Missing Out" is really powerful, Comms or no.
"Just seems like some of the clown articles are really short."
Short articles can often be the most strict. The less colorful the language, and more to the point it is, the more serious the message being sent. Same thing goes for company memos. If your boss sends a message out and it's just one sentence, it has an air of strict and serious urgency. "DO THIS, OR ELSE!"
With all that said, you gotta keep in mind that it's not just a small group who are clued in to this information. There's a whole ecosystem of Comms aware people. Most Hollywood probably is in on it. They just know what happens if they talk too much about it. Some understand it's going on, and can read the Comms to some degree, but they leave it to the "wizards" who write the Comms because they can't really understand the language. How many people use HTML on a daily basis? Just about everyone these days. How many people can read HTML? Very few, comparatively. How many people can WRITE HTML? Even fewer.
Just because they are Comms aware doesn't mean they are Comms savvy. That's where Owls come in. Soros is an owl. A horned owl at that. $OrO$ <-- Looks like a horned owl.
Owls are night-time communications directors. "Night", as in "occult/hidden/secret." They are the most magically adept at transferring messages in the "wizard" world. Think: Owls in Harry Potter. That's why Soros is in charge of the BLM/Antifa crap. He's the guy who delivers the pallets of bricks. All coordinated, all planned, and all organized using Comms to secure the deliveries. That's why no one can trace who ordered the bricks and who told the brick makers where to drop them off. It was done purely through Comms on game forums and the like. That's why he spent 40million on World of Warcraft. They've been using WOW since their Star Wars game went down.
https://qalerts.app/?n=4004
Basically, Comms aren't just restricted to Clown World Articles. They use anything they can to talk to one another "in plain sight." Game terms help establish the plausible deniability. Replace "tusken raider" with Arabs and "jawas" with Jews. How might you plan an ISIS attack using tusken raiders and jawas as stand-ins?
"I believe many of the clowns are actually literal slaves without their own agency in a lot of cases due to trauma-based programming"
Blackmail is a currency. They wanna play in the arcade, they have to sign up and accept the arcade's tokens. It's a pay to win system. The more tokens(blackmail) you have, the more "tickets" you can acquire. More tickets = more prizes. The biggest prize is becoming a "sworn" member of the Cabal. People who can no longer pay the "entry fee" get fed to the wolves. Once you're in, you cannot leave without blood being shed.
Yours, or someone who has loose lips.
---
Link to full comment thread: https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/co...mment/44494046
BMJ (12th December 2023), ClearWater (11th December 2023), edina (12th December 2023), mountain_jim (11th December 2023), Pris (12th December 2023), Yoda (18th December 2023)