The Death of Princess Diana

[Carmody]

It's simple. Stay away from 'drive by wire' cars.

Don't allow any electronics between you and the fundamentals of the vehicular controls.

[jake gittes]

The 1st cover story was "Oh the paparrazi!" caused it. Then that she was going to raise a stink about how kids were being blown to bits by finding live bombs. Then they tried to say it was because she was going to shame them all and hook up with a ~gasp~ Muslim.

I think that's all bunk and that she had discovered the depth and extent of the child molesting going on and was gonna sing so TPTB whacked her.

[grannyfranny100]

I am sorry that after all these years and professional authors's books, that you are in so such pain. Have you ever considered working as a research assistant for a noted researcher so you can show your respect and pain for Princess Diana? I think it is a sad time to bring this up here when everyone is still trying to heal from the Corey threads.

[jake gittes]

Posted by grannyfranny100 (here)
I am sorry that after all these years and professional authors's books, that you are in so such pain. Have you ever considered working as a research assistant for a noted researcher so you can show your respect and pain for Princess Diana? I think it is a sad time to bring this up here when everyone is still trying to heal from the Corey threads.

Huh? I don't understand this post.

[Citizen No2]

It was The Increment who carried out that particular operation.

@ Cidersomerset:

In fact world famous explorer and former SAS officer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes did indeed
confirm the relatively common use of this assassination method with particular
reference to the death in England of one Major Michael Marman in a car accident that
bears uncanny resemblance to that of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul.
So what could have been the motive behind the theft of the Mercedes Benz S280 that
was involved in the Paris tunnel crash on August 31, 1997?

Fiennes took what he knew of The Increment and applied it to his fictional Feathermen. The Feathermen were overseen by committee and had morals and rules. Not so The Increment. The Increment are 'off the books', have no political, geographical or idealistic loyalties......... If you have enough money and the means of contact they are the men to do thy bidding. I was told that the only caveat was, "no women, no kids", but that seems to be not the case. If the right amount of persuasion, and of course, money, is thrown at a problem, it's amazing how some problems cease to be a problem no more.

The families of the bereaved were quite upset with Fiennes's actions and the inclusion of their demise in his book. There was/is a lot of speculation regarding the deaths' of Marman, Milling and Mac. What is not under dispute however, was that the Boston Brakes technique was used on Kealy's car.

By whom is a mute point.

This news regarding the comment from the Queen, together with the letter that Diana wrote to her close confidante Jane, along with myriad evidence leads one to believe that, yes, Diana was 'taken out'.


Regards.

[Cidersomerset]

By whom is a mute point.

This news regarding the comment from the Queen, together with the letter that Diana wrote to her close confidante Jane, along with myriad evidence leads one to believe that, yes, Diana was 'taken out'.


Regards.

Yes I have no doubt she was taken out for various possible reasons , but the main one could
have been the land mine issue and the fact she was becoming a focus for global peace, after
the end of the 'cold war' . Granted first Iraq and the break up of Yugoslavia and other smaller
conflicts had happened . But the big one was in the pipe line the war on terror and the agenda
being played out now. Theres no way the mil ind complex and NWO were going to let her live
imo and they tried to make it look like a 'Drunk' accident........

[Cidersomerset]

Many of the articles , threads and posts are related and when you are aware of
history and the agendas going on behind the 'smoke screen ' mainstream headlines
it becomes clear 'Real Power' is in the hands of a few elite bloodlines that go back
to Babylon and beyond and possibly Off world and inter dimensional ancestry and
manipulation .Which takes the discussion into realms hard to prove. But back on
the 3D world level its still obvious the 99% of humanity is manipulated by one
meme or another . There are exceptions around the world and many countries
may not be directly controlled,but most of them seem to be influenced by the NWO
and other older institutions.

Who’s Profiting From The War On ISIS? // The Business of War is the Cause of War // Contractors are Mercenaries !

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...759#post987759

===========================================

Most people in the alternate community are aware of this, but since the articles are
on the headline page today , and people are looking in all the time , as well as just
a refresher for other members I'l post them....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Who’s Profiting From The War On ISIS?

By David Icke on 11th August 2015

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_154wC9hLFE

Published on 4 Aug 2015

Don't you love no ****e questions? I sure do. I join "Watching the Hawks" with Tyrel
Ventura and Sean Stone as we ask the musical question, who's making money on the
mythical mafical war on terror? As if we didn't know.

=======================================================
=======================================================



By WakingTimes.... August 7, 2015


The Business of War is the Cause of War


American Flag Militray Industrial Complex
Sergey Baranov & Ethan Indigo Smith, Contributors Waking Times

If you objectively and consistently observe the mainstream media and its interpretation
of global events, its omissive and deceptive character soon becomes abundantly clear.
This could hardly be called incompetence. The coverage, which is popularly called
“news,” is in fact nothing but a propaganda mechanism, designed to persistently shape
public opinion in favour of war.

Quo Bono ? Who benefits from war?

Certainly not the people on the warring sides. People always suffer in war; their futures
ruined and their lives destroyed. In fear, they look to their government to protect them,
the very same government that is invested in war. War is a dirty business that profits
off death and destruction while generating blood money for the profiteers. The people
are told to look the other way, outside of their country – where the ‘enemy’ supposedly
resides.But what if the real enemy is inside the country, and wears expensive suits, not
turbans? What if he speaks your language while living in luxury and sending his children
to study at Princeton, Yale and Harvard? While your kids are sent off to fight in
fraudulent wars for corporate interests masquerading as ‘patriotism’.

This is in fact jingoism – a nationalized furvor of aggression, based on the notion of
supremacy, and usually founded in a lust for power and riches. This mindset, of course,
isn’t new and is no different from Adolf Hitler’s extreme nationalism, or fascism.

Today we are living under the rule of oligarchical, trans-humanist, eugenicist elites that
continuously consolidate power in order to control and confine humanity while
methodically stripping us of the power to govern ourselves. One of the best ways to
achieve this is to keep the people in constant fear of wars and threats of terrorism, that,
in reality governments themselves typically create or sponsor. For example, we can look
at the current threat of ISIS which is in fact a remodel of Al Qaida, a group the CIA
created in the 1970’s to fight the Russians in Afghanistan.

Constant mainstream promotion of ISIS with newly released videos of beheadings and
other types of inhuman cruelty is used to scare the American people into the further
submission, and ever-greater losses of rights and personal freedoms. The growing
surveillance and domestic police state, and the passage of laws including the recent
renewal of the Patriot Act, wouldn’t be possible without always frightening the general
public. This policy ensures the constant funding of the military industrial complex, which
unfortunately has taken over the government, as Dwight D. Eisenhower, the 34th
President of the United States had foreseen and warned us about on Jan. 17th, 1961.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rd8wwMFmCeE

READ: Former Presidents Warn About the “Invisible Government” Running the United States

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/08/0...-cause-of-war/




===================================================

The next President for all his faults did try to curb TNWO ,



===================================================
===================================================

After that from Bush Snr to now the ' picked and groomed ' leaders compliant
and part of this agenda , and the mil ind complex and other corperations , media
pharma , Agricuture etc with the funding of the 'Banksters' are the tools being used
to acomplish this.........

New world order quotes from different world leaders 2015

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=R2c9PMV3ZJg

The New World Order definitely exists as a concept and is probably well and truly
happening all around us.....

===================================================
===================================================


US intel chief admits Washington knew its policies could lead to rise of ISIS

By David Icke on 11th August 2015

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BdZwzA3btzY

Published on 10 Aug 2015

The US pins the blame for the rise of ISIS on Syrian President Bashar Assad, even
after a former intelligence chief says that the White House may have willfully
contributed to boosting it. RT’s Gayane Chichakyan reports.

[Citizen No2]

In situations such as these it is never for one reason (X).

There is always a Y and a Z. Authorisation will never be given because of X, but when Y and Z fall in to place it's a done deal.

Bill Clinton had signed-up for the anti-landmine push in a loud fanfare................... but very quietly removed his name after Diana's demise.


Regards.

[Cidersomerset]

Bill Clinton had signed-up for the anti-landmine push in a loud fanfare.....
but very quietly removed his name after Diana's demise.

Whether Bill was genuine or not ? or trying to leave some sort
of legacy in his second term, especially after almost being
impeached over the Monica Lewinsky affair . It did not last
long as the Mil ind com , lobby was having none of it.

Clinton Blasted on Landmines Decision
http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9709b/clintonmine.html

===================================================



Editorial: Why won't the US sign a land mine treaty?
by NCR Editorial Staff | Jul. 16, 2014

http://ncronline.org/news/peace-just...nd-mine-treaty

[Cardillac]

if one is interested in this topic John Morgan's book "How They Murdered Princess Diana" is an absolute must; almost 700 pages, 8 yrs. of research after plowing through 7000 pages of documentation: no stone is left unturned

[Cidersomerset]

if one is interested in this topic John Morgan's book "How They Murdered Princess Diana" is an absolute must;
almost 700 pages, 8 yrs. of research after plowing through 7000 pages of documentation: no stone is left unturned

Thanks Larry I was looking for something to watch for an hour or so.....


Princess Diana's Murder & Cover-Up

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gSaJDbia3EU

Published on 22 Feb 2015


James Fetzer interviews John Morgan.
http://princessdianadeaththeevidence....

[Cidersomerset]

I missed this last year just noticed the vid while on another topic. No way
of knowing if true without more details but possible ?


BEFORE ITS NEWS...

Dying Mi5 Agent Admits to Killing Princess Diana in Deathbed Confession
(Video) “Got Nothing Left to Lose Be4 Death”

Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:03

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birth...h-2509556.html

Retired MI5 Agent Reveals Princess Diana Secret at His Deathbed Confession.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=V7L-8Oae5GA

Published on 19 Jun 2017

Retired MI5 Agent Reveals His Secret about
Princess Diana at His Deathbed Confession.

[scotslad]

Very interesting revelations.

(apologies if this latest video has already been made available elsewhere on the forum)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Rhom9FqPoPY

[mountain_jim]

^ it says unavailable above now, and when I enter the direct youtube link, the video appears for less than one second, then is replaced by video unavailable

Mod note from Bill:
I just checked, and it does seem to be 100% all fine here.
Maybe just a glitch, or country-specific?

[palehorse]

It is all good here, I just downloaded a copy, thanks @scotslad for the upload.

Maybe the video uploader on YT had set some sort of restrictions.. try with a vpn, it may work, happen to me sometimes.

[Ewan]

It plays fine from Paris via VPN. Looks like may be blocked to UK IP's.

[Tigger]

Posted by Ewan (here)
It plays fine from Paris via VPN. Looks like may be blocked to UK IP's.

Unavailable in AUS too, it seems.

[Tintin]

Posted by Tigger (here)

Posted by Ewan (here)
It plays fine from Paris via VPN. Looks like may be blocked to UK IP's.

Unavailable in AUS too, it seems.

Diana: The New Evidence | Investigation (2017)

With thanks to Bill for helping with the MP4 render, we've now put this in the library



Description:

Diana: The New Evidence - Over twenty years on, there are still questions about the terrible crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Al Fayed and the driver Henri Paul. This new film brings the story up to date with new evidence not seen before on T.V.

Diana: The New Evidence (2017)
Director: David Cohen
Stars: Princess Diana, Tracey Emery
Genre: Documentary
Country: United Kingdom
Language: English
Release Date: 2017 (United States)

Synopsis:
When Princess Diana died twenty years ago, the media, the British public and her admirers around the world wanted to know the answer to one question: was Diana’s death a tragic accident, or the result of a conspiracy involving the Royal Family, and the British Secret Intelligence Service? Twenty years on, we re-examine the evidence to look into the truth behind the outlandish theories.

This 20th Anniversary special goes deeper than ever before into the events surrounding the crash, featuring eye-witness accounts, CCTV footage, and interviews with those closest to Diana. In particular, we investigate the whereabouts of Henri Paul, driver and MI6 informant, on that fateful night. With missing evidence, censored documents and eye-witness testimony ignored, the possibility of a shocking conspiracy involving nerve gas, a remote detonator, and years of planning remains, to this day, terrifyingly plausible.

Also including exclusive interviews with Prince Harry and Prince William, we look back at Diana’s legacy, and the lasting impact her death on her sons’ mental health. Diana’s own campaigning on mental health represented a bold challenge to the Royal Family, whose own mental health secrets were closely guarded. Did these confrontational, radical opinions cost Diana her life?