A.I. is Progressing Faster Than You Think!

[ExomatrixTV]

• Is Coding Dead? (AI's Takeover):

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z1Ph9sISqMY

• I Was Wrong About A.I. Video (A.I. is Progressing Much Faster!):

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UTziRyMzkO0

[ExomatrixTV]

• Trust Nothing - Introducing EMO: A.I. Making Anyone Say Anything:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BkAjoeBWPc4

EMO by AliBaba is scary-good at taking any source image plus audio and making the image look like they are saying/singing the audio. See for yourself.

[ExomatrixTV]

• China just entered The War for humanoid robots - But Tesla has an edge!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XF6AFAA6Wcc

• It Happened! Elon Musk Revealed BIG Upgrade Tesla Bot Gen 3 - Optimus! Hit the Market in 2025!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NOljjZP75Gg

[ExomatrixTV]

• A.I. News: Brace Yourself for the Coming A.I. Storm!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=w_MkopTWn-c

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Fastest A.I. Chip in the World Explained:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NzYpoPhckCk

[ExomatrixTV]

[norman]

Does anyone actually read this thread ?


Blackstone to build 60 football field-sized data centers worth $25 billion
Jan 30, 2024


https://interestingengineering.com/c...rth-25-billion


Blackstone's $25 billion data center will power the AI revolution.


Private equity giant Blackstone is constructing a colossal $25 billion empire of data centers in Arizona. The linchpin of this venture is the $10 billion takeover of data center operator QTS in 2021, marking one of the most significant investments in Blackstone’s history.

A strategic bet on the AI revolution

The biggest private equity firm globally will build massive facilities to meet the computing needs of big tech companies. By acquiring QTS, a top data center operator, Blackstone is well-positioned to benefit from the growing demand for digital infrastructure driven by the AI boom.

[grapevine]

Posted by norman (here)
Does anyone actually read this thread ?

Some of it, yes, although as a "dipper and skimmer" here I have only a conceptual understanding of the infinite possibilities of AI.

For me, the most frightening aspects are:
- the nature of the human race and its potential for harm, which we see daily;
- the inevitability of AI progression and our inability to opt out;

[ExomatrixTV]

• Breaking: Elon Musk Open A.I. Bombshell "AGI Achieved Internally", Q-star, Lawsuit To Dissolve OpenAI:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jPuLfomqS1Q

• 00:00 AGI Threat
  
• 06:18 OpenAI Institute
  
• 12:38 Falling Out
  
• 20:54 Q-Star aka Q*
  
• 27:40 Unfair Business Practices
  
• 32:08 The End

The Verve put it well: “it fundamentally accuses OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman, of pretending to run a nonprofit designed to benefit humanity while actually running a regular ol’ tech company and trying to make a lot of money. That’s a pretty good criticism of the entire OpenAI situation, actually! Someone with some intellectual honesty and a competent lawyer should run at that sometime.”

• Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman and others connected to OpenAI, aiming to dissolve OpenAI, setting the stage for a multi-act legal drama.
• Musk demands a jury trial, aiming for public attention, leveraging his understanding of the value of attention.
• The lawsuit delves into the risks of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the history of AI's evolution.
• AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) poses existential threats and economic shifts, with OpenAI aiming for AGI development.
• Musk sees AGI as an existential threat, while others view it as a source of profit and power.
• OpenAI, initially a nonprofit, aimed to counterbalance Google's AGI efforts.
• OpenAI's GPT-4 is its most powerful language model yet, scoring high on various tests, but its internal design is kept secret, causing controversy.
• GPT-4, developed by OpenAI, is deemed an AGI algorithm by Musk, sparking legal disputes.
• Microsoft's significant leverage over OpenAI, exploiting board changes, raises questions about control over AGI development and proprietary algorithms.
• Microsoft's involvement in OpenAI's affairs, particularly with GPT-4, is under scrutiny.
• OpenAI's internal dynamics, including board changes and Microsoft's involvement, hint at deeper power struggles and potential ideological conflicts.
• Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman and others connected to OpenAI, aiming to dissolve OpenAI, setting the stage for a multi-act legal drama.
• AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) poses existential threats and economic shifts, with OpenAI aiming for AGI development.
• OpenAI's GPT-4 is its most powerful language model yet, scoring high on various tests, but its internal design is kept secret, causing controversy.
• Microsoft's significant leverage over OpenAI, exploiting board changes, raises questions about control over AGI development and proprietary algorithms.
• OpenAI's internal dynamics, including board changes and Microsoft's involvement, hint at deeper power struggles and potential ideological conflicts.
• Board dynamics within OpenAI, including the firing and reinstatement of Sam Altman, indicate power struggles.
• The lawsuit brings attention to the complexities of AI development, legal implications, and corporate interests.

• Elon's bombshell lawsuit against OpenAI:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KbzGy3whpy0

• Breaking: Elon Musk Drops OpenAI Bombshell "AGI Achieved":

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eWn64SjTGx8

• Elon Musk files HUGE LAWSUIT against OpenAI (“He’s Hiding AGI”):

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_1Fp1A1JWT4

Elon Musk just dropped a massive lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman personally. He claims OpenAI took his money, didn’t pay taxes, and then converted into a for-profit entity, breaking their original charter.

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Miller (here)

Posted by norman (here)
Does anyone actually read this thread ?

Some of it, yes, although as a "dipper and skimmer" here I have only a conceptual understanding of the infinite possibilities of AI.

For me, the most frightening aspects are:
- the nature of the human race and its potential for harm, which we see daily;
- the inevitability of AI progression and our inability to opt out;

If the collective (harvested) Human Intelligence is, metaphorical speaking, the "father and mother" of A.G.I. ... is it not obvious it should pay 100% respect to its creator >>> UNLESS it gets hijacked by the pathetic "Ultra Elite Parasite Class" (over the top control freaks) like: WEF/Blackrock/Blackstone/Vanguard/Bilderbergers/Rothschilds/Rockefellers ... Then all goes out the window to serve their Dystopian Agenda2030 totalitarian NetZero2050 with their tunnel vision "The Great Reset" Transhumanist Depopulation Agenda.

That is why we need much stronger rogue A.I. & A.G.I. to counter that! ... Exposing, among others, ALL suppressed inventions that could have solved 1000s of problems already and reverse the mass enslavement agenda.

• Study: "Life in 20 years - David Shapiro 2044 'Hyperabundance' Predictions"
• and Transhumanism Upgrade - Wireless Body Area Network - Internet of Bodies & Behaviour.

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
March 3rd, 2024

[ExomatrixTV]

• China's Humanoid Robot JUST SHATTERED World Record! $90,000 Model Begins Deployment Across US and EU

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WWAnJX889j0

3.3 meter per second = 11.88 kilometers per hour = 7.38 mph.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Elon Musk Predicts AGI, Self-driving, Unlimited Energy, Robots Coming SOON:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9DA5cfCbVK0

Max Headroom Effect?

[meat suit]

Posted by Miller (here)

Posted by norman (here)
Does anyone actually read this thread ?

Some of it, yes, although as a "dipper and skimmer" here I have only a conceptual understanding of the infinite possibilities of AI.

For me, the most frightening aspects are:
- the nature of the human race and its potential for harm, which we see daily;
- the inevitability of AI progression and our inability to opt out;

I am very thankful for this thread, a most important topic. Thanks John

[norman]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Elon Musk Predicts AGI, Self-driving, Unlimited Energy, Robots Coming SOON:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9DA5cfCbVK0

Max Headroom Effect?

What Musk sees as an escalating buildout of A.I. ( and that video maker is salivating and excited about ) may actually be the true 'Black Hole' that the critics of CERN were warning about.

[Blastolabs]

This discussion could use a counterpoint.

AI isn't true intelligence yet, but it's an incredibly useful tool. As a musician with coding as a hobby, I admit my knowledge has significant gaps.

I'm also extremely disorganized – in the bottom 4% for organization skills. While I can grasp concepts I can not express my thoughts to others well but GPT-4 excels at explaining and organizing them.

It is truly amazing, what would have taken me many weeks if not months to understand and figure out I can now do in a few hours.

I don't have GPT actually write the code, but I do ask it about 200 questions everyday, and I always have it add comments that explain any new code I'm looking at.

I also have it help it organize stuff, and create mini manuals that explain the functionality in finished stuff.

Here is an example, today (in about 4 hours) I wrote new code for an audio prototyping rig I made a few days ago that functions as an audio looper that also has reverb and as a completely separate thing it also outputs an ASDR envelope that consists of voltage. (I needed an envelope)

Audio of one of many loops I made today after creating this strange device


Afterwards I finished the code, and (after some serious trouble shooting) was completely shocked to see that it worked highlighted the code and asked GPT, "write a quick manual explaining the features"

It output this image including formatting:

[Matthew]

There's a fine line between using AI to become a better content creator and having AI create your content for you. AI will ultimately become a rival content creator. Along the way AI is mind-blowingly seductive... the idea of it being a rival to humans seems so far away. But you heard it here first.

[norman]

Posted by Matthew (here)
There's a fine line between using AI to become a better content creator and having AI create your content for you. AI will ultimately become a rival content creator. Along the way AI is mind-blowingly seductive... the idea of it being a rival to humans seems so far away. But you heard it here first.

All the time that people spend "using" A.I. is a two way exchange.

Some may be comfortable with that . . . . . for now.

[Blastolabs]

Posted by norman (here)

Posted by Matthew (here)
There's a fine line between using AI to become a better content creator and having AI create your content for you. AI will ultimately become a rival content creator. Along the way AI is mind-blowingly seductive... the idea of it being a rival to humans seems so far away. But you heard it here first.

All the time that people spend "using" A.I. is a two way exchange.

Some may be comfortable with that . . . . . for now.

The fact that they use the word AI doesn't mean that we are dealing with a consciousness.

It's a tool, Cliff High has this part right, "AI" doesn't exist for the use of the general public yet.

GPT just looks at probability and has no intelligence at all.

People said the things about the typewriter

[norman]

Posted by Blastolabs (here)

Posted by norman (here)

Posted by Matthew (here)
There's a fine line between using AI to become a better content creator and having AI create your content for you. AI will ultimately become a rival content creator. Along the way AI is mind-blowingly seductive... the idea of it being a rival to humans seems so far away. But you heard it here first.

All the time that people spend "using" A.I. is a two way exchange.

Some may be comfortable with that . . . . . for now.

The fact that they use the word AI doesn't mean that we are dealing with a consciousness.

It's a tool, Cliff High has this part right, "AI" doesn't exist for the use of the general public yet.

GPT just looks at probability and has no intelligence at all.

People said the things about the typewriter

I'm sure that's true but I'm also sure it records everything for later, or it passes everything on to another process that does that. 25 billion 6 football field sized data farms aren't for writing people's code or writing people's science papers etc for them. Catherine Fitts said the winner in the game of A.I. is the one with the most data. That seems real to me and a powerful motivator for data hoarding in all possible ways that they may not even have the processing concepts for yet.

I've never touched ChatGPT or any of them so I don't know but I believe you can only do that by creating an account that identifies you with your activity interfacing with it. If the people running it don't allow random access to it, figure it out from there.

[Matthew]

AI is a learning program, not a program. Its creators have thrown their hands up, saying AI will get exponentially more powerful, more so than we can easily comprehend.

We don't have a frame of reference for it, or the problems it solves. What I mean is, ChatGPT 3 could have replaced the nations GCSE (UK) exam markers, and marked the exams more consistently than any hierarchy of teachers could have. What is the collective term for teachers? Anyway I could look it up but Chat GPT 3 from 2023, with say 100 teachers monitoring and correcting it, could have done that job. But it didn't because people weren't ready for it yet. But AI gets better and better through more usage. Typically it's hard to see its potential, although that wont stop its potential.

The best frame of reference we have for a technology revolution like this is the world wide web (www) introduced in 1997; first people saw its potential and spouted a load of bull****, then there was excitement and investment, then a bust, before a greater boom and now it has all but taken over. The www was a revolution because it bridged an ease of use gap for the internet. But the www cries itself to sleep dreaming of the ease of use gap AI brings. AI has unprecedented seductive charm and a psychopathic-like approach, be it in a mechanical way, not neurological way.

It famously gets exponentially better, because it's a learning program not a program. Your input is it's future output. Seriously, there are a lot of well qualified talking heads publicly worried about AI's potential, ..these are heads of AI companies who have stepped down. Check out some of the 2023 posts in this thread.