When they slander you on Wikipedia ... it is almost impossible to change their lies & obvious errors!

[ExomatrixTV]

When they slander you on Wikipedia ... it is almost impossible to change their lies & obvious errors!

• Has anyone experience successfully correcting a (personal) Wikipedia page?

⚠️ I studied (amongst others) the history of the Occult Network using Hitler as their front-puppet for years in the early 1990s then I decided to share (for consideration purpose only) at the time a very rare documentary called "UFOs, Secrets of The Third Reich" in 1998 via a local radio as a warning to all NOT to "promote fear" nor "spread propaganda" but to see & study BEYOND the obvious!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zZ7YyLg_ewU

Because of that I was falsely accused being an "Antisemitic". Many who know my true history debunked the bs claims/accusations. Years later most of the highly controversial documentary was also broadcasted on BBC, Belgium BRT, Dutch 🇳🇱 VPRO, France TV, German WDR, Discovery Channel etc. etc. between 2000-2007 >> I was/am 100% vindicated but some still assume i "must" be "Antisemitic" and recently they even put their false accusations on the Dutch 🇳🇱 part of Wikipedia

‼️ Must I sue Erik Krebbers for defamation, libel & slander if he does not take it down and publish a rectification. NO ONE in my family nor in my friends network has anything to do with being "pro-fascism" nor being "Antisemitic" and I have NO "track record" of being that at all ... If they can claim I am I love to study any real evidence but they are NOT ABLE as it is all based upon 2 sources: Extreme Leftist Erik Krebbers & Marcel Hulspas who works for the Military Intelligence attacking my former CNI Foundation I co-founded in 1992 with Exposure Magazine, Exposure Radio & Exposure TV Amsterdam organizing several (sold out) international conferences.

🌐 Soon all will be explained in 4 languages on my site WITH evidence of the original "Koekoeroe Reedio" broadcast in Leiden 1998 where at the time Extreme Leftist Erik Krebbers lived, used that as his bases to slander me which easily can be debunked.

I have been accused of being "Anti-Semitic" for discussing the Dutch 🇳🇱 Jewish Council in Amsterdam (Holland) unanimously helping the Nazis deportation the Jews more effectively to the death camps between 1940-1945 ... This is admitted amongst others by Rob Oudkerk (Alderman) son of the President of the Dutch Jewish Council ... Dutch Historians on AT5 ... all mainstream ... by ONLY quoting mainstream sources is considered "evidence" that I "must be Anti-Semitic".

I did this on Local Koekoeroe Radio Leiden 1998 ... I requested all listeners to correct me if I am wrong and the phone-lines were open to have an open debate ... some did but the guy Eric Krebbers (also from Leiden) who assumed I am "Far Right Fascist" (what I am not) so he refuses to talk to me but claims the "knows all about me" and wrote a hit-peace article without evidence that get copied all over the place. This far left OPINION article became the bases for Wikipedia to write me off as "Antisemitic" ... Because of this false accusation, I had to explain myself over and over.

Assumed "Far Right" (which most are not) articles with solid (mostly mainstream) sources & citations are not allowed on Wikipedia if it is controversial but if you have Far Left Opinions with no real sources & citations what is claimed it is allowed on Wikipedia. They even use that as an excuse NOT to correct anything on your own wiki page as they dominate the false narrative so much, so you lost all your "credibility" about your own life just because you were branded as "fascist" or "far right" which is hilarious as I have NO track-record of having that specific agenda.

You can not correct your own wiki-page because of an opinion article written by the far left branding you "far right", endless examples why I do not fit in that category.

Because I was founder of Exposure Magazine, Produced Radio & TV shows in Amsterdam, organized several sold out international Conferences all dealing with Suppressed News & Conspiracy Research.

To question all abuse of power will expose all forms of tyranny. Which later I got vindicated many times, but at the time I was accused being "extreme". When almost all predictions came to into fruition, they assume I have no effect because I was branded & banned.

I invited amongst others David Icke to the Netherlands in 1994 +'96. So many blindly trust the labels against David Icke. Framing anyone challenging the status quo.

At the same time I temporarily lived in a house full of Jewish symbols & customs because she (Arda) left Holland to go to Israel becoming an Orthodox Jew, and she is a long time friend of my mothers. When she came back too early due to circumstances, I was living WITH her being 100% Orthodox Jew with no problems at all respecting her wishes, her customs & daily rituals.

My German Grandfather Johan Kühles refuses to join the German army and fled to Holland (Limburg) before the World War II broke out to live with my Dutch-born Grandmother (Having roots in France).

He helped multiple Jewish family members during the war (taking high risk to his life and all his children) in his cellar of his grocery store he had. Later those who he had saved/helped, rewarded my Grandfather by putting all his 9 children (including my current father) having much faster a new house when the time comes ... As they owned many houses via big estate agency, who would not exist if they were sent to the death camps.

I worked in mid 1990s with "Alien Visitor Shop" (later been taken over by this lady) in Amsterdam selling UFO Magazines, Our Exposure & Frontier Magazine, T-shirts, Books, CDs, Gadgets etc. etc. and they all were Jews and had NO PROBLEM with that whatsoever they knew I was critical to all religions & atheist & political systems ... and they even agree with me being critical to ALL abuse of power no matter who doing it.

But somehow being critical of part of the Jewish Elite is not allowed. And I am also aware that if I do that too often I will attract real Antisemitic fanatics ... that is the KEY reason they want to silence ANYONE that questions "authorities" dealing with what really happened in Germany.

My passion is researching suppressed news, hidden history, cover-ups, conspiracies etc. ... that passion has NOTHING to do with "hating" a specific group of people.

cheers,
John Kuhles
October 7, 2020

[ExomatrixTV]

• Hitler's Monsters: A Supernatural History of the Third Reich:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=96r_nvkC30Y

• Where Is the Nazi Temple of Doom?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Apn1ybvcQu8

• The Occult Roots of Nazism

[ExomatrixTV]

• Larry Sanger: Wikipedia's 'Long, Slow Slide Into Leftist Propaganda':

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=McoEd6VqijY

Wikipedia's self-described "ex-founder" Larry Sanger describes the shift of the online wiki-encyclopedia from its early efforts towards neutrality to its current state of what he calls "Leftist Propaganda." In a conversation about the difference between neutrality and objective truth, Sanger says that Wikipedia currently adheres to neither—now it represents only the establishment view on topics.

[Open Minded Dude]

Recently saw parts of an interview with the author of 'Blackbook Wikipedia' (volume 2 already), don't know if it will ever appear with English translation but it would be worth it:

The encyclopedia of encyclopedias, in which everyone can contribute, has displaced all other reference works from the market: Wikipedia is free, available in over 300 languages ​​and is used by university professors as well as by teachers and students or journalists and editors. However, a knowledge monopoly harbors dangers. This is why the following applies in particular here: knowledge does not only mean power, but above all responsibility with regard to the accuracy and neutrality of the content. But does Wikipedia live up to this claim? Is the lexicon really as free and independent as it appears to be? Some people have already suspected it, but with this book it becomes a certainty: In Wikipedia there is targeted, even systematic manipulation in favor of influential interest groups from politics and business who are trying to push through their agenda in this way. The book uses numerous sources and illuminating examples to show that this is not a conspiracy theory and how this happens in practice. This, the second volume of Black Book Wikipedia, also deals with the dubious financing of the supporting organization Wikimedia Foundation and also the circles in which those responsible move. Last but not least, the book deals with how you can successfully defend yourself legally against defamation and character assassination on Wikipedia.

Quote is from here and the YouTube video (yes ... it's really on YT!) in German can be found there too, so for whoever knows a bit of German:

https://nuoflix-de.translate.goog/sc..._x_tr_pto=wapp

[ExomatrixTV]

• Wikipedia ... and the Blatant Propaganda!

Wikipedia: An open encyclopedia or a covert propaganda platform? (SPR)

Updated: March 2024
Published: March 2020

Mogelijk gemaakt door

Is Wikipedia an open encyclopedia or a covert propaganda platform?
The basics

As the seventh most visited website in the world and the most popular online encyclopedia, Wikipedia exerts great influence on the knowledge and worldview of many people.

While Wikipedia is generally thought of as an open, transparent, and mostly reliable community project, upon closer inspection, this turns out not to be the case.

In fact, the English Wikipedia with its 7 billion worldwide pageviews per month is governed by just 500 active administrators, whose real identity in many cases remains unknown.

Furthermore, studies have shown that 80% of all Wikipedia content is written by just 1% of all Wikipedia editors, which again amounts to just a few hundred mostly unknown people.

• Corporate influence

Obviously, such a non-transparent and hierarchical structure is susceptible to corruption and manipulation, the notorious “paid editors” hired by corporations being just one aspect.

In 2015, for instance, a German Wikipedia administrator was exposed as a project manager at pharma­ceu­tical company Merck who was whitewashing Wikipedia articles on Merck’s history and products. Yet despite the exposure, the manager remained a Wikipedia administrator.

In another case, a German journalist and PR consultant used several pseudonymous Wikipedia accounts to protect French pharmaceutical corporation Sanofi-Aventis against negative reports.

In 2014, a study revealed how German airline Lufthansa removed data on aircraft noise from Wikipedia, how vehicle manufacturer MAN deleted information on its tank production during World War II, how car producer Daimler removed information on political lobbying, and how pharma­ceutical company Boehringer excised information on its production of “Agent Orange”.

More recently, employees of Indian commodity trading billionaire Gautam Adani were caught using over 40 fake accounts and paid editors, including an influential Wikipedia reviewer, to manipulate Wikipedia articles related to the Adani Group and its founder.

Some of these actions are detected by Wikipedia editors themselves, others are uncovered by external researchers or journalists, and still others remain unnoticed.
Nevertheless, this murky corporate influence on Wikipedia is just the tip of the iceberg, as the covert and systematic manipulation of Wikipedia reaches much deeper than that.

• Intelligence services

Already in 2007, researchers found that one of the most active and influential English Wikipedia administrators, called “Slim Virgin”, was in fact a former British intelligence informer who had moved to Canada and lived there under a false identity.

In the wake of this discovery, academic researchers using the newly developed WikiScanner tool found that CIA and FBI employees were secretly editing Wikipedia articles on controversial topics, including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo military prison.

More recently, another highly prolific Wikipedia editor, going by the name of “Philip Cross”, turned out to be linked to British intelligence and several British establishment journalists. Among other things, “Philip Cross” targeted journalists and academics who opposed British military interventions.

In 2023, investigators found that the government of Saudi Arabia managed to install sixteen agents as Wikipedia administrators; the agents not only controlled articles on political topics, but revealed the identities of two independent administrators to Saudi authorities – who put them in jail.

Even in Switzerland, unidentified government employees were caught whitewashing Wikipedia entries about the Swiss secret service just prior to a public referendum about the agency.

• “Zionist editing of Wikipedia”

In addition to some Western countries, Israel is one of the most active and influential state actors on Wikipedia.

The Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Public Diplomacy, founded in 2006, has long been known to coordinate pro-Israel activists in various countries who assiduously edit Wikipedia and other online platforms according to Israeli interests. To this end, the Israeli ministry even developed an app, called Act.IL, to quickly define and assign various tasks.

As early as 2008, leaked messages revealed how Israeli lobby group CAMERA enlisted and covertly coordinated Wikipedia authors and administrators to influence articles on Israeli topics, vilify critics and dominate Google search results: “First we build our army, then we go to war. () This is a marathon, not a sprint. () Avoid the appearance of being one-topic editors.”

Israeli efforts to shape Wikipedia articles have been supported by some high-profile individuals. For instance, IT entrepreneur, IDF commander and later Israeli Prime Minister, Naftali Bennet, previously organized courses in “Zionist editing” of Wikipedia.

In Germany, one of the most aggressive Wikipedia editors was exposed, after a two-year legal battle, as a political operative formerly serving in the Israeli army as a foreign volunteer. The operative used the pseudonym “Feliks” – a reference to Feliks Dzerzhinsky, the architect of the early Soviet “Red Terror” campaign – and manipulated hundreds of articles.

In 2021, it was revealed that the American-Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) had an entire team of nine staff members dedicated to editing Wikipedia and working ADL sources into Wikipedia articles. The ADL had previously been caught in several illegal spying operations and was exposed as an Israeli intelligence front by Mossad whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky.

Wikipedia itself was founded in 2001 by two American-Jewish IT entrepreneurs, Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger. While Larry Sanger has since abandoned and criticized the platform (see below), Jimmy Wales remains a board member of the Wikimedia Foundation and in 2015 received the $1 million Israeli Dan David prize for technological accomplishments.

• Private intelligence firms

In addition to state intelligence services, private intelligence firms also manipulate Wikipedia articles as part of covert PR or smear campaigns on behalf of their corporate or government clients.

In 2022, for instance, the leaked Abu Dhabi Files exposed how a Swiss private intelligence firm called Alp Services secretly manipulated Wikipedia articles in several languages on behalf of the rulers of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The purpose of this multi-million dollar operation was to discredit or destroy people and organizations deemed unfriendly by the UAE.

To this end, Alp Services first planted defamatory articles about the targeted people in several media outlets and then “requested the assistance of friendly moderators” to add this negative information to their Wikipedia articles and block any attempted corrections. Finally, Alp Services ensured that the negative information ranked highly in Google internet searches.

The campaign on behalf of the UAE – just one of several such operations conducted by Alp Services – led to the bankruptcy of at least one energy trading company and damaged the reputation of a UN human-rights expert, who later described Wikipedia as “a monster”.

• “One of the most dangerous websites on the internet”

Many Wikipedia manipulators are editing articles almost all day and every day, indicating that they are either highly dedicated individuals, or perhaps operated by a group of people.

Moreover, articles edited by these personae cannot easily be revised, since the above-mentioned administrators can always revert changes or simply block disagreeing users altogether.

Many of these covert campaigns attempt to promote establishment and industry positions and destroy the reputation of critics. Because of its influence, German watchdog group WikiRadar described Wikipedia as “one of the most dangerous websites on the internet”.

Particularly affected by this kind of systematic and covert manipulation are Wikipedia articles about political and geopolitical, commercial, societal, medical and some historical topics as well as biographies of non-compliant academics, journalists, and politicians.

In some cases, relentless defamation campaigns on Wikipedia drove victims into suicide.

• The “Skeptics” movement

In addition to PR firms and state actors, several activist groups also play an important role in editing and manipulating Wikipedia articles.

One of the most influential but least known activist groups on Wikipedia are the so-called “Skeptics”, an obscure and cult-like organization whose members are “skeptical” not of official establishment positions, but of people challenging such positions. Thus, the “Skeptics” essentially serve as “cyber warriors” for political and corporate interests.

The “Skeptics” originally focused on esoteric topics such as UFOs, homeopathy and parapsychology (hence the name “Skeptics”) but have since expanded their online and offline activities into far more complex political, medical and scientific fields.

Although most “Skeptics” aren’t professional scientists themselves, they often defend an alleged scientific “consensus” or “authority” and vilify critics of an official position as “cranks” or “conspiracy theorists”. Typical examples include debates on medical and pharmaceutical questions, global climate change, or intelligence operations.

One the one hand, “Skeptics” keep real and sometimes dangerous quackery off of Wikipedia, but on the other hand, they also suppress legitimate debates on complex issues.

In 2010, the “Skeptics” launched an initiative called “Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia” (GSOW) to train their members in aggressive Wikipedia editing. Their global Wikipedia activities have since been coordinated on a dedicated “Project Skepticism” website.

In a 2019 comment on nutrition studies, a British member of the “Skeptics” confidently declared that “the Skeptics will always run Wikipedia”.

During the coronavirus pandemic (2020-2022), too, members of the “Skeptics” movement played a central role on Wikipedia by asserting official but mostly false positions and by defaming dissident researchers, doctors and journalists. Thus, to name but two examples, a lab origin of the virus was dismissed as a “conspiracy theory” and vaccine protection was greatly exaggerated.

In 2022, an anonymous Wikipedia editor and “Skeptic” was exposed as a Texas-based FBI informant specializing in “online marketing” and working for the “InfraGard” program. This might indicate that some members of the “Skeptics” movement do in fact act on behalf of intelligence services.

One of the founders and “gurus” of the Skeptics movement was American stage magician James Randi, who died in 2020. In the 1960s, phone calls by Randi requesting sexual services from teenage boys were recorded. In the 1980s, Randi received a grant of almost $300,000 from the CIA-linked MacArthur Foundation. In the 1990s, Randi was a consultant to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF), which questions allegations of child sexual abuse; two other consultants to the foundation worked for the notorious CIA program MK-Ultra, which carried out psychological experiments. In 2012, Randi’s Venezuelan partner was convicted of identity theft and passport forgery. In 2015, Randi’s name appeared in Jeffrey Epstein’s address book.

In a 2013 presentation of the James Randi Educational Foundation, “Skeptic” activist Susan Gerbic acknowledged that Wikipedia was “the single most important tool in the Skeptical toolbox”.

• Other activist groups

Another activist group that is very active in editing and manipulating various social and political topics on Wikipedia is the so-called “Antifa” movement. Unlike traditional left-wing movements, the modern “Antifa” movement supports Western military interventions and Israeli foreign policy.

In 2021, leaked documents showed that a leading member of the American “Antifa movement” was in contact with British and American intelligence services and attacked both conservative and traditional left-wing publicists and politicians who were critical of US and Israeli foreign policy.

In 2016, a German investigation revealed that many Wikipedia articles on political and historical topics were written by the same lead author: a piano teacher and “Antifa” member who used several different usernames and spent several hours per day editing Wikipedia.

A more recent investigation showed how a single pseudonymous Wikipedia author used a single newspaper article to add the term “right-wing extremist” to the very first sentence of twenty Wikipedia articles about state associations of a conservative German political party.

On the complex topic of global climate change, too, various activists try to assert the official view and vilify dissenting scientists. Some of this activity is sponsored by governments, such as the “project for improving communication of climate change knowledge through Wikipedia”.

In 2019, investigators found that German Wikipedia articles on global warming, climate change, climate change denial, science denial, wind energy, solar energy, and Greta Thunberg, all had the same lead author: a member of both the Green Party and the “Skeptics” organization.

• Wikipedia and the (psychopathic control freaks working for) WEF

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has repeatedly defended the current architecture and operation of Wikipedia. Wales is a friend of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair – in 2012, Wales even married Blair’s former diary secretary – and a “Young Global Leader” of the Davos World Economic Forum.

Speaking of Davos, Wikimedia has itself amassed a fortune of more than $160 million, donated in large part not by lazy students, but by major US corporations and influential foundations, a situation that has given rise to some significant conflicts of interest.

Despite its millions in foundation assets, every year Wikipedia asks its readers for donations, creating the misleading impression that it is a reader-funded platform.

Former Wikimedia CEO Katherine Maher (2016-2021) previously worked at the influential US Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as well as at a subgroup of the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a CIA front organization specialized in global influence operations and regime changes.

Katherine Maher is also a WEF Young Global Leader, a Senior Fellow at the NATO-linked Atlantic Council, and a member of the US State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board. In 2016, a Tunisian politician stated that Maher may in fact be a US intelligence asset.

Wikimedia Germany, too, is closely interlinked: its former Managing Director previously was Vice President for Corporate Communications at the Bertelsmann Media foundation and later became a State Secretary in Berlin. Media giant Bertelsmann is a corporate member of NATO think tank “Atlantic Bridge” and operates the so-called “content moderation” for the German Facebook.

• Geopolitical aspects

The fact that Wikipedia is influenced by Western and Israeli intelligence services may help explain why articles on geopolitical topics, such as Russia and Iran, are usually aligned with Western geopolitical interests.

Moreover, many leading authors of the Russian Wikipedia are located not in Russia, but in Ukraine, Germany, and the United States. Similarly, many leading authors of the Persian Wikipedia are located not in Iran, but in the United States, Canada, France, and Germany.

In 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Wikimedia and the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs started a collaborative campaign “to create and improve articles about the culture and people of Ukraine in as many language editions of Wikipedia as possible.”

The lack of control over Wikipedia editors may also explain why some non-Western countries decided to block access to Wikipedia altogether. Even Nato member Turkey blocked access to Wikipedia between 2017 and 2020 to “protect national security”, after political links to a terrorist group were mentioned on the platform.

Finally, US search engines and social media platforms increasingly refer to Wikipedia to outline or suppress “controversial topics”. The revelations discussed above may help explain why.

• “I no longer trust the website I created”

In a 2021 interview, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger revealed that he no longer trusted the website he had created. In particular, Sanger noted that any topic or controversy that didn’t appear in the “center-left mainstream media” wouldn’t appear on Wikipedia.

Indeed, Wikipedia accepts almost only establishment media outlets as “reliable sources”, while independent media outlets, regardless of their quality, remain largely excluded. Even some conservative establishment media outlets have been banned as “unreliable sources”.

In a 2023 interview with US journalist Glenn Greenwald, Sanger argued that Wikipedia had become an “instrument of control” in the hands of the American establishment and intelligence services, adding that “no encyclopedia has ever been as biased as Wikipedia”.

Sanger emphasized that “a great part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online, on websites like Wikipedia”, and that intelligence services “had learned the Wikipedia game and push what they want to say with their own people”.

Sanger has since helped launch two alternatives to Wikipedia, Justapedia and the Encyclosphere, both of which strive for objectivity, neutrality, and civility. Other Wikipedia alternatives include WikiSpooks (deep politics), Scholarpedia (scientific topics), and Metapedia (conservative).

• Conclusion: WikiWho?

As detailed in this article, Wikipedia may have started as a community project and open encyclopedia two decades ago, but it has since increasingly become a covert propaganda platform influenced by corporations, state actors, and activist groups.

To add at least some degree of transparency, German researchers have developed a free web browser extension called WikiWho that lets readers color code just who edited what in Wikipedia. In many cases, the result looks as discomforting as one might expect.

Figure: Editors of the Wikipedia article on the “war on terror” (WikiWho)



Who edited what? (WikiWho) Annex

Videos

• Wikipedia – A Tool Of The Ruling Elite (On Contact, 2018, 25 minutes)
• Wikipedia co-founder: I no longer trust the website I created (Unherd, 2021)
• “How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet” (IAK, 2018)
• Operation Feliks: Unmasking a Wikipedia Mercenary (Pohlmann, 2020)

Literature

General

• Wikipedia and the Intelligence Services (OhMyNews, 2007)
• CIA, FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits (Reuters, 2007)
• Spies in Wikipedia (Computerra Magazine, 2007, archived)
• What we know about SlimVirgin (Wikipedia Review, 2007)
• Wikipedia and the Spooks – The Remake? (Intel Today, 2018)
• The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites (ML, 2018)
• Wikipedia: Rotten to the Core (Helen Buyniski, 2018)
• Time to ditch Wikipedia? (Five Filters Analysis, 2018)
• Wikipedia Editing Scandal Continues (Neil Clark, 2019)

Skeptics

• Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia (FreeWiki, 2019)
• The Skepticism Syndrome (Dr. Edgar Wunder, 1998)
• Policing orthodoxy on Wikipedia: Skeptics in action? (JCOM, 2021)

Wikipedia Alternatives

• WikiSpooks (about deep politics)
• Scholarpedia (scientific topics)
• Metapedia (national-conservative)
• Conservapedia (US conservative)
• Justapedia (focused on objectivity)
• Encyclosphere (meta search engine)
• Britannica (Encyclopedia Britannica)
• InfluenceWatch (public policy influencers)

Tools

• Wikipedia X-Tools (Wikipedia analysis tools)
• Who Wrote That? (Wikipedia editor analysis)
• Wikipedia: Measures against abuse (SPR)

Wikipedia about SPR

In May 2020, two months after the first publication of the above analysis, a Wikipedia article about Swiss Policy Research was created that tries to misrepresent SPR as a “fake news website”. Most of the English version was written, anonymously, by one Mason Pelt, an FBI informant (InfraGard) and “Skeptic” from Dallas, Texas, who specializes in “online marketing”.

Additional input was provided by Thibaut Laurent Payet, a long-time Wikipedia administrator who used a fake account (“OKTalker”) to add defamatory statements about SPR. Payet lives in Geneva, Switzerland, and has been linked to a private intelligence firm specializing in online defamation campaigns on behalf of governments and corporations.

Other authors include a US political activist (“Gobonobo”), an English missionary (“Anna795bc”), and a Hungarian “Skeptic” (“MrFringilla”). The German Wikipedia article about SPR was written by well-known political activists like “Ghormon”, “KurtR” and “Anidaat”. Needless to say, almost all of the claims made in the two Wikipedia articles on SPR are false or misleading.

See also

• The CIA and the Media
• Advanced Online Media Use
• The US/UK Media Navigator

source 🇬🇧
german 🇩🇪

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Who has experience successfully changing (correcting) a Wikipedia page? ANYONE? ...

Maybe using someone else who has a "ranking trusted position", to change your "wiki page" the correct way with your name? (using valid sources & evidence) ANYONE?

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[Reinhard]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Who has experience SUCCESSFULLY changing (correcting) a Wikipedia page? ANYONE? ...

Maybe using someone else who has a "ranking trusted position", to change your "wiki page" the correct way with your name? (using valid sources & evidence) ANYONE?

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Hi John,
I remember Wade Frazier mentioning his experiences with Wikipedia. You may want to contact him.
cheers,
Reinhard

[ExomatrixTV]

See also:

• Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia
• He says there’s a complex game being played to make an article say what somebody wants it to say.

• Wikipedia Co-founder Says Site Is Now ‘Propaganda’ For Left-leaning ‘Establishment’

• Wikipedia Co-founder: I No Longer Trust The Website I Created

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳