*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[ExomatrixTV]

Imagine if the people who saw the man on the roof SHOUTING OUT LOUD:

"There is a (possible) shooter on the roof ... GET Trump DOWN! ... BRING HIM OUT OF SIGHT"

... then running towards the crowd near Trump: saying AGAIN:

"There is a (possible) shooter on the roof ... GET Trump DOWN! ... BRING HIM OUT OF SIGHT"

then again:

"There is a (possible) shooter on the roof ... GET Trump DOWN! ... BRING HIM OUT OF SIGHT"

Until Secret Service near trump help him to protect BEFORE the 2 minutes countdown to the fatal shots ... as you saw in the video here!

This could also have saved the one who died!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳


For the record, I worked for security late 1980s early 1990s ... amongst others for the American Consulate in Amsterdam.

[norman]

Posted by Bright Skies (here)

Since when did the awake and aware community start bowing down and worshipping world leaders?

I'm very much of the same general perspective but I'm trying not to let the Black and white absolutist in me dominate over my faith orientated pragmatism. I think we have a part to play in fixing things, one pragmatic step at a time.

It's like how I hate and distrust allopathic medicine and want the world to be free from it, but the situation we are in right now is a train wreck and we need stretchers and ER facilities before we need 'lifestyle changes and healthy eating etc'.

But, you can be sure that if I see people (and I know I will) worshipping the ER crews or ER crews taking advantage of the trust people have placed in them for a specific and trained reason, I'll be speaking up and reminding them all what's what, as always, and as you are too, in your own way.

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Bright Skies (here)
"bowing down and worshiping"

So if we do not follow your assumed narrative, we suppose to be "bowing down and worshiping" world leaders?

Really?

[Delight]

Another video with some additional information about
Trump Assassination Attempt: False Flag, Inside Job, or USSS Failure? Analyzing July 13 w/ John Cardillo (Ex-NYPD) & Zach Vorhies (Google Whistleblower) – Ask Dr. Drew


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v54uzat/?pub=mpxgj

[Alecs]

Yesterday, CNN published that "Audio forensics suggest as many as three weapons fired at Trump rally".

The article states that forensic (audio) analysis shows the first 3 shots came from one weapon, the next 5 shots came from another weapon, and the final "acoustic impulse" came from possibly a third weapon. The analysis was performed by two members of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver. (USA)

While the article goes on to discuss the (rooftop) gunman's likely distance from the podium based on audio analysis, it mentions nothing of how far the other weapon user(s) were from the podium. (We might presume that the last weapon user was the professional who neutralized Crooks.)

[BMJ]

From Donald Trump Juniors twitter account, it speaks for itself.

Former Secret Service Agent @dbongino On @DonaldJTrumpJr 's Show Today With @TuckerCarlson And @DavidSacks

"I was also told that the Secret Service Director has been given instructions from the Administration and the DHS Secretary that if you want to keep your job, you'll keep your mouth shut about this."

Also some great news CIC Trump is in good spirits.

@DonaldJTrumpJr describes the first convo he had with his father after Trump was shot: “He comes out defiant, ready to fight for our country…I just said, ‘Hey, you’re the biggest bad ass I’ve ever met. I could not have been legitimately more proud, ever, as a son.’”

[helium]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by ErtheVessel (here)
Delight's post #418 above with regard to the mind-control aspect of all of this reminded me of another post Delight did on the Vaccine Crimes thread, #1985.

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by ErtheVessel (here)

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by ErtheVessel (here)
"And you can specifically, the explicit targeting of human cognition, how people perceive and interpret information to gain knowledge and understanding is very specific Cognitive Warfare. How do you do it? With these nano electronics. You can completely take over someone's brain."

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by ErtheVessel (here)

Is something about this entire drama perhaps an experiment to see how well their covid jab nano-technology actually works in real life in a high-stakes situation?

I found it suspicious that both of Crooks parents, Matthew and Mary, were both identified as professional "behavioral counselors" in this article here.

I found reference to the parents early on and have been waiting to see more info. This really does smell of MK Ultra-ish malfeasance such as with many teen (or early post-teen) mass shooters in the recent past. In the West we are aghast when we see children wrapped in explosive vests and told by elders in non-Western countries to detonate themselves in a public market. But the exact same thing is happening in the US, in our midst.

Especially with the 'water tower' shooter info coming out it seems obvious that a twenty year old kid was set up as a patsy.

I searched to see if this video has been posted yet or not and didn't find it.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/GtiWdyT7BRaB


Obviousy the author of the video has an agenda. At about the 2:00 mark there does seem to be a clear indication that the original footage was not tampered with, though, providing the actual timing of the ushering of the camera operators up to the front of the stage just before the shots were fired. And the checkered shirt/dark ballcap cameraman is clearly at front stage getting all kinds of iconic stills of the aftermath just after he was told to move up front from his backstage position. If this video is accurate it does indicate foreknowledge on the part of the SS (yes, they deserve that accronym). They wanted the scene to be recorded by the photographers. I'm sure they expected Trump's brains to be splattered instead of what they got.

Back to clif_high's attempt to decipher his data that pointed to something ocurring on or near the 15th of July: I found it interesting to listen to clif stumble around for some sort of explanation for his data. It's not easy to pin exact details to something like a precognitive vision, let alone details to something like clif's raw data. If the PEAR lab's random number generators were giving us data for this time frame I would bet that they'd show a significant perturbation.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1622881

The most significant aspect of this particular event in my eyes is the degree of participation by the public at large, not only in terms of the crowds present but also in terms of the collaboration online around the world. This hugely public event would naturally create an enormous energetic eruption. I know it sent me into a loop days before the event. Of course I knew nothing about the actual event, but did catch the very first reporting of it when it occured since I was furiously seeking some sort of explanation for why I was feeling what I was feeling beforehand.

Now, I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that in some far future time there will be a 'Harry Seldon' who develops a 'psychohistory' theory, and that theory will be traced all the way back to our very own Clif High and his data processing methods. Clif is so much fun.

One more comment: Clif does speak of UFO's as he attempts to interpret the July 15th data. We all know that clif is into aliens and UFO's. I think he was referencing the remote viewing data when speaking of UFO's in his video. I'd suggest that he refrain from including anything but his own data in his efforts to interpret it. That's just a suggestion coming from someone who has spent a lifetime interpretting scientific data (much of it related to EEG correlates to things like OBE's and lucid dreaming). BUT, there's one strange connection here to Clif speaking of UFO's. And that has to do with Daniel Liszt (Dark Journalist) who has consistently pointed out that Donald Trump is in possession of knowledge re: aliens/UFO's having it handed down to him by a family member. The most recent Dark Journalist presentation references this. And many of his past presentations suggest that the real reason the swamp creatures (or those who control them) do not want The Donald near any kind of power is that he will spill the beans on the hugely classified alien prescence.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=E9AruCirN2M

I just thought I'd make that connection just in case anyone might be interested. Please do not assume that I 'believe' any of this stuff. It's fun to take the broadest picture possible into consideration, though.

If you think about it, Clif's work really is very close to providing a beginning to understanding mass psycho-social behavior, ala 'psychohistory.' I get a grin on my face thinking about that.

[ExomatrixTV]

[norman]

As Ole Damegard would say, "there's always a Drill". Well, it wasn't a drill this time it was a Police and Fire 'Games'. Whatever that was, it would be a good way to bring specialists into the area to scope out the operation, to move people around and put operatives into position.

George is talking the most sense I've heard so far about the shooting lines of sight and the places where bullets hit.

George Webb joins Peter Duke, live from Butler, Pennsylvania

Boots on the Ground in Butler

https://rumble.com/v577zir-boots-on-...in-butler.html


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v54vqv7/?pub=1yatds

[norman]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by ErtheVessel (here)
Delight's post #418 above with regard to the mind-control aspect of all of this reminded me of another post Delight did on the Vaccine Crimes thread, #1985.


"And you can specifically, the explicit targeting of human cognition, how people perceive and interpret information to gain knowledge and understanding is very specific Cognitive Warfare. How do you do it? With these nano electronics. You can completely take over someone's brain."

Is something about this entire drama perhaps an experiment to see how well their covid jab nano-technology actually works in real life in a high-stakes situation?

I found it suspicious that both of Crooks parents, Matthew and Mary, were both identified as professional "behavioral counselors" in this article here.

That would be a good fit with MK Ultra originated programs that western Pennsylvania has a long deep history of, according Cathy O'Brien and Bryce Taylor.

The first questions to answer are Why do they live where they do?, was it a 'career opportunity', are they multigenerational etc.

I was reminded of this while listening to this DukeReport with George Webb. If you go to 57 minutes in the video you'll hear Peter Duke bring it up.

Having listened to hundreds of hours of podcasts etc about that kind of stuff I can very easily believe the kid's parents are up to their necks in at least an outer circle of such a network. These networks become vast and so long term and stable that people forget or ignore that they are involved in something wrong. It's a social and professional group just like any other social and professional group, with it's own package of acceptable ideologies and justifications.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

I started watching the video, as the Infowars title suggested that the Secret Service had been ordered to 'stand down' and allow an assassination to happen.

But it's misleading. He's discussing (correctly) how the level of protection has been generally ordered to be reduced for Trump, and of course not approved at all for RFK Jr.

It's merely about DHS protection policy, NOT about the details of this specific event.

[ThePythonicCow]

.
Three days ago, I wrote above:

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Here's a possibility that came to my mind a few hours ago ...

Perhaps Trump's blood and ear wound is quite real ... not faked at all.

But perhaps a complicit Secret Service agent ... manually made that wound ...

I've spent the last three days developing an increasingly complicated theory of what happened during this attempted assassination of Trump in Butler, PA., expanding on the above hypothesis.

Fortunately for my reputation here, my theorizing kept feeling a bit too weird, even by my standards, and I didn't post much, if any of it, here.

Well ... it's too late now. I have discarded my theory, after reading the best analysis of what happened that I've found so far. The following article's insights and observations turned my theory to garbage, and I tossed my theory into my mental wastebasket.

Here's the best analysis I've read so far of what happened at the attempted assassination of Trump in Butler, PA.:

• Trump assassination attempt: separating fact from fiction, in ArnGrimR's Substack

I had been figuring out in two dimensions the locations of buildings, bleachers, shooter, Trump, ... fairly carefully in my own studies, but ArnGrimR goes the extra mile and figures out their positions in three dimensions, and the resulting lines of sight.

When I gather the energy, I might return here and summarize it, in another post. Or perhaps someone will beat me to that task.

Here's a little teaser, that might send a few readers off to ArnGrimR's Substack to read this article right now:

Super brief summary:

• The Secret Service really botched it.
• There are hints (such as CNN broadcasting it live) that the assassination was a significant planned operation.
• Trump got really lucky ... or benefited from a miracle ... depending on how you understand such things.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Alecs (here)
Yesterday, CNN published that "Audio forensics suggest as many as three weapons fired at Trump rally".

The article states that forensic (audio) analysis shows the first 3 shots came from one weapon, the next 5 shots came from another weapon, and the final "acoustic impulse" came from possibly a third weapon.

CNN does a really sketchy job of covering that "three weapons fired" analysis.

For example, while I'd guess that the actual analysis got three separate distances, based on the timings of the shot sounds, for each of the three groups of shots, CNN totally glosses over those details, commenting only on the shot distance that matched the distance from the shooter on the roof to Trump at the podium.

CNN also provides no link or other reference sufficient to track down that audio analysis.

As a result, too little of whatever that audio forensic analysis might have noted makes it through CNN's reporting to be of much use, to me at least.

Perhaps CNN was just looking for someway to justify a headline that suggested multiple shooters, in order to get clicks on an article that was little more than a short assemblage of a few observations of the events.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
.
Three days ago, I wrote above:

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Here's a possibility that came to my mind a few hours ago ...

Perhaps Trump's blood and ear wound is quite real ... not faked at all.

But perhaps a complicit Secret Service agent ... manually made that wound ...

I've spent the last three days developing an increasingly complicated theory of what happened during this attempted assassination of Trump in Butler, PA., expanding on the above hypothesis.

Fortunately for my reputation here, my theorizing kept feeling a bit too weird, even by my standards, and I didn't post much, if any of it, here.

Well ... it's too late now. I have discarded my theory, after reading the best analysis of what happened that I've found so far. The following article's insights and observations turned my theory to garbage, and I tossed my theory into my mental wastebasket.

Here's the best analysis I've read so far of what happened at the attempted assassination of Trump in Butler, PA.:

• Trump assassination attempt: separating fact from fiction, in ArnGrimR's Substack

I had been figuring out in two dimensions the locations of buildings, bleachers, shooter, Trump, ... fairly carefully in my own studies, but ArnGrimR goes the extra mile and figures out their positions in three dimensions, and the resulting lines of sight.

When I gather the energy, I might return here and summarize it, in another post. Or perhaps someone will beat me to that task.

Here's a little teaser, that might send a few readers off to ArnGrimR's Substack to read this article right now:

Attachment 53392

Super brief summary:

• The Secret Service really botched it.
• There are hints (such as CNN broadcasting it live) that the assassination was a significant planned operation.
• Trump got really lucky ... or benefited from a miracle ... depending on how you understand such things.

This is a great article, I really like how this was phrased in the article:

I am not concerned about unity. Americans are much more united than they realize, and much more than our media, dividers par excellence, give them credit for.

I truly believe this! It's a great deception to believe that half the country is aligned with this dark and evil agenda being forced on the population.

As for this assassination attempt, I believe a huge percentage of the population suspect conspiracy/inside job.

[Phoenix1304]

This would indicate that the usual suspects were at play. So happy the attempt failed and hope they lose a TON of money.

[norman]

If anyone wants to check out the shooting location on Google maps/earth THIS is the exact address and coordinates as copied from the address bar in my browser while viewing it.



This LINK will bring up a street view of the now famous water tower ( seen from the car park near it ).

It looks like a place a sniper could shoot from but not a place a sniper WOULD shoot from. The trees behind it don't look mature enough to support a sniper either.

Google images are always out of date so things could be different now than when this image was captured.

[Antagenet]

I enjoyed her Maui Fire analysis, so I wanted to see her reaction to the Trump shooting.
About half way through she starts all her numerous questions. It's an enjoyable watch
and I like her sense of humor.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EC3yGf6SLOc

[Frankie Pancakes]

It was a theatrical production nothing more. No way in hell some pencil neck geek gets by the secret service no way. The fake blood, ridiculous fake picture of the alleged bullet in flight. Absolutely ridiculous. so say some.

Each side is seemingly supplied enough evidence to confirm their assumptions and drip-fed enough rage-bait – a lot of it entirely invented – to keep their echo chambers echoing and their attack dogs frothing at the mouth.

Essential to this of course is that neither ‘side’ and no theory is ever finally proven to be right or wrong.

Meanwhile, most of the MSM is currently happy to dismiss both sides as “conspiracy theorists”.

It really is a fascinating phenomenon to watch unfold. Are we witnessing a new meta for propaganda narratives? Instead of uniting with fake “consensus”, distracting with an eternal battle between two approved partial or total falsehoods.

As usual, the truth is likely in neither camp but buried beneath the unwarranted assumptions and unproven “facts” neither side questions.

But look at the benefits already accruing to the narrative-managers.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1812681701912625619

Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes

WOAH Listen To This: Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle “She has close ties to the Cheneys, the Bidens and is responsible for the J6 deleted texts scandal”

She “evacuated vice president Dick Cheney on 9/11”

You can not tell me this wasn’t an inside job 🚨

“She would know. The 28 year veteran was on the team that evacuated vice president Dick Cheney on 911, and she served on then then vice president Biden's protective detail. He named her director in mid 2022.

New election. Amid a swirl of controversy agency deleting nearly all of its text messages from January 6th.

The agency says that was due to a data migration. System migrations happen. But I think for a lot of Americans, it just doesn't pass the smell test given the timing and the volume of messages deleted.

Well, it's unfortunate that that would be the assumption that people would make. Our integrity is everything, and there was nothing nefarious attached to that.“




https://x.com/DarkSideAdvcate/status...45219579707876

IamLegend 🇺🇸
@DarkSideAdvcate
·
Jul 15
🚨Asset Identification Marker (A.I.M.)

Would be assassin: shoots

Unknown Woman: drops “SIGN”(A.I.M.) and start recording on her “IPhone”(A.I.M.)

__

Who is she?



https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1813566275064586418

Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
How many more of these disturbing questions are going to have to be raised?

This isn’t even a retractable ladder. This is a heavy ladder.

And we are being told that police lost visual ID on the suspect THREE TIMES?

This is beyond incompetence. Disturbing.

[Alecs]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by ErtheVessel (here)
Delight's post #418 above with regard to the mind-control aspect of all of this reminded me of another post Delight did on the Vaccine Crimes thread, #1985.


"And you can specifically, the explicit targeting of human cognition, how people perceive and interpret information to gain knowledge and understanding is very specific Cognitive Warfare. How do you do it? With these nano electronics. You can completely take over someone's brain."

Is something about this entire drama perhaps an experiment to see how well their covid jab nano-technology actually works in real life in a high-stakes situation?

I found it suspicious that both of Crooks parents, Matthew and Mary, were both identified as professional "behavioral counselors" in this article here.

Well, I'm trying to avoid making posts of minute speculation here, but there is something else about the article you reference. On that page, scroll down to the Jakob twitter post of Jul 14.

Specifically, look at the collage of 3 photos that, together, imply they are all of the same male. But, the ears (yes, back to ears) of the man in the larger of the photos looks different than in the photo of [him at a younger age] in the bottom right of the collage. (Click on that one to open up to a fuller view.)

Recall the personal short video of this man saying that he hates republicans, he hates Trump, and you got the wrong man.




Update: In second paragraph, I subsequently altered "earlobes" to "ears" which is what I meant to originally communicate.