Terrence Howard & 1 x 1 = 2

[Neptune7]

Posted by ulli (here)
....unless they study how consciousness really works.

How can they study that if they continue to limit themselves to finite timespans and dimensions?

[Ernie Nemeth]

-------------------------------

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
given: 1 x 2 = 2

if: 1 x 1 = 2

then: 1 x 1 = 1 x 2

∴ 1 = 2

quote: "if: 1 x 1 = 2" ???

1 Amount Of Something Is Just 1 Something ...Not 2

1 Times 1 Is Not The Same As 2 Times 1

• An "amount" or a "quantity" is NOT the same as the object(s)/substance(s)/"physical thing(s)" that you are counting ... So why assume it is the same? ... Why?

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

• see also this

[Ernie Nemeth]

---------------------------------

[Ernie Nemeth]

--------------------------

[Bill Ryan]

Mod note from Bill:

I've moved a whole bunch of interesting posts to the far more serious thread: Is the Multiverse real...?

(This thread is NOT serious, and Terrence Howard is a fool. )

[Neptune7]

My intent when joining this thread was not to discuss the results of 1 x 1, but to ask the gnosis what they think the whole episode was about. In other words, why did Rogan give so much time to such silliness? In contrast, Rogan filmed an episode with Randall Carlson and Malcolm Bendall that he did not release as his staff thought Bendall might be a con artist.

However, Bendall makes ALOT more sense than Howard, and he supposedly has a working prototype in London that you can observe.

I came away from watching it with the feeling that the whole thing was concocted to promote Eric Weinstein; To make the light highlight in a painting brighter, surround it in darkness. To promote Eric, create a massive craze of silliness, (the darkness) and have him come in and give an 'Elite' review, (the light).

This is why I suspect that Weinstein is getting so much promotion:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aUgKYHPszDg

I have seen much evidence that almost all of the great breakthroughs since about 1920 have been taken out of the public eye, and replaced with String Theory and Feynman's circular reasoning.

The best source for that data that I know of are various podcasts (and books) by Dr. Joseph Farrell on the Nazi takeover of Science in Germany and Europe starting in about 1920. (The Nazi's not only scoured Europe for Gold and Gems, they spent as much or more effort ransacking the patent offices and removing all records of everything that was interesting.)

Before the end of the War, the Nazi's had also set up somewhere between 700 and 900 research labs around the world with one member of what Dr. Farrell calls the Nazi International on staff as 'observer.'

In other words, is Weinstein searching for the Nazi International? Was that the point of the whole episode?

N7

[lightpotential]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Mod note from Bill:

I've moved a whole bunch of interesting posts to the far more serious thread: Is the Multiverse real...?

(This thread is NOT serious, and Terrence Howard is a fool. )

Hello Bill,

I agree to the extent that I think Terrence Howard does not know what he is talking about. But I am quite convinced that he thinks he knows what he's talking about.

His knowledge appears to be quite superficial. One might say that he is ‘Facebook educated.’ It is strange and quite tragic.

Indeed, I have seen several people within the so-called alternative media go down the wrong rabbit hole and come up quite ‘mental.’ Dustin Nemos is a good example. A few years ago I thought he was a very level-headed man. And then, he went ‘full flat Earth.’ And even considers himself to be some kind of authentic Israeli – whatever that means.

Terrence Howard can be bypassed quite readily in favour of far more substantive voices within the field, far closer to the truth.

Keith

[Ernie Nemeth]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
given: 1 x 2 = 2

if: 1 x 1 = 2

then: 1 x 1 = 1 x 2

∴ 1 = 2

quote: "if: 1 x 1 = 2" ???

1 Amount Of Something Is Just 1 Something ...Not 2

1 Times 1 Is Not The Same As 2 Times 1

• An "amount" or a "quantity" is NOT the same as the object(s)/substance(s)/"physical thing(s)" that you are counting ... So why assume it is the same? ... Why?

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

• see also this

I cannot believe that a four line grade school mathematical proof was so badly misconstrued.
Let me explain it then.

1) the first line is the given - the part of the proof that is known to be a true statement, and will later be used to prove the premise of the the thread incorrect: 1 x 2 = 2

2) the 'if' statement is the premise of this thread, namely: 1 x 1 = 2

3) the 'then' statement is the consequence of the premise on one side compared to the fact that 2 = 1 x 2 on the other side (this is the comparison, which should give an equivalency, but doesn't): 1 x 1 = 1 x 2

4) this line is actually superfluous because the line above is not a true statement and has already proven that the premise of this thread is wrong, it was only added for clarity and obviousness because of course 1 ≠ 2: 1 = 2

But by removing all the other posts and leaving mine means that this simple proof was not understood for what it is, and now my posts were left out of context.


I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE PREMISE OF THIS THREAD AND THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PATENTLY OBVIOUS!
thanks

[Jim_Duyer]

When Actors do their work for some years, they tend to get addicted to the rush of fame. It becomes their judgment stick of their own self worth after some time - even though it should not. Age spots and lines on the face drive them nuts, lack of mentions in news outlets drives them to depression, drink, drugs or all of the above. Some, like Joe Black, react by poking Politicians and putting their opinions inside of conversations that they really have no knowledge or expertise of. Terrence is a good example. Starting some months ago he has been in the limelight nearly constantly, on one media or another. And, like those that push the flat earth, he is supporting theories with no evidence. When he dips into the areas of theoretical physics he has an easy playing field - all of that is theory and there is not and can not be any way to prove it scientifically, given today's state of knowledge. When he pollutes simple mathematics, he has gone past the point of helping people, and arrived at the area of indoctrination of less than brilliant thinkers into a camp of confusion. None of his activities will add to our knowledge, none will help to educate those less knowing - all they will do is add confusion and put attention on himself. Please, just let it go. The harm he does can only be fueled by attention - ignore him and he will soon pass into obscurity again - where he was before he began this campaign. Just in closing, notice how many times he has said "you only have three months before .....". How many times has this three months run out? Wow.