WW3? Ukraine/US vs. Donbass/Russia

[Ravenlocke]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
Text:
🚨🇺🇦 Pro-Ukraine Telegram channel ADMITS that Ukraine bombed the hospital & lied about it;

"The Office of the President made a mistake by instructing propaganda to widely promote the video and compare it to Patriot in order to convince Ukrainians that the enemy struck the hospital. It’s easy to compare photos of the X-101 on the internet and then look at the NASMAS missile to understand the simple truth: our air defense hit Okhmatdyt. For Bankova, it is now important to use the tragedy for a new emotional wave before the NATO summit, but by comparing the video and photos, we will face a major scandal in the future when Western journalists write about it." - RezidentUA

https://x.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1810342867036184654

Text:

Ukrainian Telegram channels have published a video clip filmed in the center of Kiev. The video shows a Ukrainian police officer pouring blood from a blood bag on a man in a doctor's coat.

The doctor is an employee of the Okhmatdet hospital, whose photos were published by the world's largest media outlets


https://x.com/rybar_force/status/1814252322765013096

https://x.com/rybar_force/status/1814284827148869890

https://x.com/squatsons/status/1814258814444515599

[Vicus]

War Crime 21+: Ukrainian Nazis From Azov Proud Of Killing Unarmed Russian Servicemen

After numerous videos of crimes of Ukrainian Nazis were widely spread online, nullifying the efforts of Ukrainian propaganda to create the fake image of ‘a brave Ukrainian serviceman fighting for democracy’, Ukrainian servicemen were officially prohibited to film the tortures and other their crimes. The hostilities continue, Ukrainian war crimes are hidden but they do not stop.

On July 15, official sources of the Ukrainian Nazi Azov battalion proudly published the video showing another their crime against a Russian servicemen. During the mop up operation in a captured Russian military position, Nazis of the 12th special purpose brigade “Azov” killed a wounded unarmed Russian serviceman.

Video 21+ Warning!

The official comment claimed that the video shows an alleged ”shooting battle at a distance of less than 10 meters”. This is the way, the Nazis are trying to hide the crime; but the video clearly shows that there was no shooting. There were no other Russian servicemen in the trenches except the wounded shell-shocked unarmed victim. This is a war crime.

The Russian Investigative Committee launched investigation of the circumstances of the murder. This is the way the grinded Ukrainian military responds to the mercy of Russian servicemen, who are trying their best to save lives of Ukrainian soldiers both on the battlefield and in the captivity.

Ukrainian Nazi militants grown by the Nazi Kiev regime do not care about the international law. Supported by Western warmongers, they are still living in the crumbling world of the rules-based order.

vicus comment:
You can see the azov emblem proud on that video ...
Those are the Nazis troops supported from "Democratic" West...

https://southfront.press/war-crime-2...an-servicemen/

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1814268119872889271

https://x.com/aussiecossack/status/1814299951029215478

[Vicus]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DjaPvpioS6g

6 hours ago

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1814295385126343070

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1814310862242435142

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/MayadeenEnglish/status...90791444959492

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/...n-bus-terminal

FSB thwarts ISIS terrorist attack on bus terminal

On Friday, Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said that it had disrupted a terrorist plan targeting a bus station in the southern city of Essentuki.

An official statement detailed how FSB officials captured a man accused of planning the assault who is believed to be a migrant from a Central Asian republic and an ISIS member.

The FSB released footage of the arrest and following interrogation. In the video, the inmate is heard stating that he "pledged allegiance" to ISIS and is prepared to assault their orders. Following the incident, he intended to fly to Syria and join the terrorist group.

According to the FSB, the suspect planned to carry out the assault using an improvised explosive device. Officers reported finding components for the device in a hiding area in the detainee's leased garage.

The suspect also examined the site of the attack, estimated times for large gatherings, and chose the location to install the explosive device before being captured. Terrorist propaganda materials were discovered at the suspect's apartment and a criminal investigation has begun. The culprit faces life imprisonment.

In early July, the FSB announced that it had foiled an attempt by Ukrainian special services to carry out a terrorist attack targeting Russia's sole aircraft carrier, Admiral Kuznetsov, stationed in Murmansk.

"The Russian Federal Security Service has stopped attempts by Ukrainian special services to commit terrorist attacks on the heavy aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov in the city of Murmansk," the statement read.

In detail, in March 2024, a Russian military serviceman stationed on an aircraft carrier was contacted through online messaging platforms by a Ukrainian special services operative. The operative employed psychological manipulation tactics to provoke the serviceman into planning a terrorist attack on the warship.

Upon the serviceman reporting the incident to security authorities, comprehensive measures were undertaken under their supervision to gather evidence of the Ukrainians' illicit activities and identify potential collaborators and accomplices in Kiev.

In March, a terrorist attack took place at the Crocus City Hall in Moscow. that claimed the lives of more than 137 people. At least 7 people were taken into custody and charged with terrorism.

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/ug_chelsea/status/1814322095674822949

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1814355899038752866

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/aussiecossack/status/1814303340945342717

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/MaimunkaNews/status/1814267458137600424

https://x.com/SputnikInt/status/1814372006697054379

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/MayadeenEnglish/status...81020276912171

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/...ng-before-uk-c

Zelensky requests long-range missiles in meeting before UK cabinet
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the United Kingdom cabinet on Friday, a move that demonstrates newly-elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer and London's support for Ukraine, as Zelensky asked Western allies for additional leeway on long-range capabilities.

Following a forum of European leaders at Blenheim Palace, Starmer continued his effort to elevate Britain's role in global affairs by inviting Zelensky to speak to his top ministers. According to Starmer's office, the last foreign leader to address the cabinet was US President Bill Clinton in 1997.

Reportedly, Zelensky reiterated a call for Western allies to allow long-range strikes deep into Russian territories and asked the UK to influence its allies to adjust their policy on the matter.

"Right now we are missing the main answer to this question and that is our long-range capability. Please convince the other partners to remove the limits," Zelensky pleaded at the meeting in Downing Street.

Moreover, Starmer assured Zelensky that his country would expedite the delivery of crucial aid to Ukraine. This follows the defense minister's statement earlier this month that the aid pledged by the previous Conservative government would be delivered within 100 days.

"Ukraine is, and always will be, at the heart of this government's agenda and so it is only fitting that President Zelenskiy will make a historic address to my cabinet," the prime minister said in a statement shortly before the meeting was convened.

Labour's support lies with Ukraine

Since taking office, Starmer reaffirmed the UK's unwavering support for Ukraine amid its war with Russia.

On Thursday, he announced that Britain would implement a new strategy to hinder Russia's attempts to bypass shipping sanctions. Additionally, Britain imposed sanctions on 11 vessels used for transporting Russian oil.

The new measures target Russia's "shadow fleet" by planning to share data on the network of often older tankers used for shipping Russian oil, enabling identification and action against individual vessels.

He also introduced the Defence Export Support Treaty, set to be signed by defense ministers, which will allow Ukraine to access £3.5 billion ($4.5 billion) in export finance to strengthen both countries' defense industries and increase production.

Last week at a NATO meeting, Starmer reaffirmed a commitment made by his predecessor, Conservative Rishi Sunak, to provide £3 billion annually in military support to Ukraine until 2030-31 and potentially beyond if necessary.

Labour to maintain decision allowing Kiev to hit targets in Russia

The new UK Labour government will not reverse the decisions of its Conservative predecessor regarding allowing Kiev to strike targets on Russian territory with weapons provided by London, the Financial Times reported last week.

In June, the United States and some other countries, including the UK under Rishi Sunak's premiership, allowed Kiev to use Western-donated weapons to strike inside Russian territory.

The newspaper mentioned that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer signaled that the UK arms must be used in accordance with international humanitarian law for defense, but it will be up to Kiev to decide how to use the ammunition.

"Today and tomorrow and the next day is all about standing together with our allies, discussing practically how we provide further support for Ukraine," Starmer told reporters before he headed to Washington to attend NATO's 75th-anniversary summit.

[Ravenlocke]

Text:
⚡️Chargé d’Affaires a.i. of the Russian Mission to the EU Kirill Logvinov answers a question by TASS News Agency, 18 July 2024

❓Question: How accurate were your predictions regarding the appointment of Ursula von der Leyen as President of the European Commission? How should we understand the daily publications in the Western media over the past month about various "risks" for the confirmation of Ursula von der Leyen, given that she is supported by the four mainstream political forces of the EU, which control 2/3 of the seats in the European Parliament, and her candidacy was the only and uncontested one from the very beginning?

💬Anyone who doubted a positive vote for Ursula von der Leyen right up to the end obviously did not fully understand the processes that are shaking the European Union. Today, Brussels tends to give the impression that there is a choice, but in reality it is only an illusion.

The triumph of Ursula von der Leyen is a triumph of the Eurocracy and the existing political system. Despite the painful results of the European Parliament elections, which should have affected this system, it continues to pursue a policy that has led to the strengthening of the positions of right-wing forces in Europe. Moreover, it has distributed the leading positions in the EU behind the backs of the voters and against their will.

❌The recent vote gave a clear answer to the question that worried many - what will change in the European Parliament after the elections? Well, absolutely nothing. This was a kind of first test of commitment to democracy, and the European Parliament failed it.

It would seem that the new MEPs should have taken into account the opinion of those voters who expressed their dissatisfaction with the current course of the EU, which is being pursued not by some abstract forces but by the European Commission led by Ursula von der Leyen. Instead, the MEPs voted for Ursula von der Leyen, and the people of Europe saw their wishes disregarded.

❗️The so-called "people's representatives" have made it clear that there will be no change, but rather a cementing of the existing political landscape. The newly elected MEPs have joined this system not to change it, but to enjoy its benefits and to stamp out globalist decisions that serve the interests of transatlantic lobbyists.

https://x.com/RusMission_EU/status/1813920615650230373

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/mfa_russia/status/1814055761124761958

Text:

NOTE: Originally published on July 13, 2024 by Compact dubbed in German.

This 80-minute interview lead to the German government outright banning the entire publication and harassing the media's associates only 2 days after the video was published. Among the many topics touched upon in the interview were facts about the origin of the crisis in Europe and developments in the Kiev regime-controlled Ukraine since 2014, its war on the people of Donbass that lasted for nearly 8 years as well as the topic of NATO non-enlargement promises given in the early 1990s and the terrorist attack on the Nordstream pipelines and the hard fact that should the German authorities wished it, the remaining line could go operational in a matter of a month, thus alleviating Germany's dire need for energy.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_ix_CTP5tuw

[jaybee]

.

Just seen this - is this really happening? Is Britain actually pulling back from the brink...? of war with Russia...

over Ukraine....

Is NATO facing the realities that a hot war with Russia would NOT go well.... for all involved AND in particular for the West - especially the UK and Europe...

I will look for more about it but it looks like although long range deadly weaponry will still be sent to Ukraine there will be restrictions on it's long range use...?

If the new Labour Government is pulling back from war with Russia I might have to say something nice about them...

Won't Help Ukraine...': UK PM Starmer Shocks Zelensky With Clear Refusal To Take On Russia(3:03)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=S5x5EQciuCI

edit to add.... I see that post 15912 (from Ravenlocke) talks about all this and it's not as simple as it might seem - BUT - I still hope that while the warmongers are saving face - there may be a glimmering of common sense happening...?

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/tassagency_en/status/1814387300060553332

https://tass.com/world/1819115?utm_s...m_social_share

US may stop helping Ukraine in future, says Blinken

Nevertheless, the US Secretary of State recalled a security agreement recently inked by the US and Ukraine

WASHINGTON, July 19. /TASS/. The United States may stop providing aid to Ukraine in the future, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said at a fireside chat at the 2024 Aspen Security Forum.

"Every [US] administration has an opportunity, of course, to set its own policies. We cannot lock in the future," the top US diplomat said when asked if Washington would continue to honor its obligations to Ukraine if Donald Trump is reelected president.

Nevertheless, Blinken recalled a security agreement recently inked by the US and Ukraine.

"Now if we were to renege on this, I suppose that’s possible. But happily, we have another 20 <..> countries [of the West that have similar agreements with Kiev]. And we are heading towards more than 30 that will be doing the same thing. These are long-term commitments to Ukraine," Blinken said.

On July 18, former US President Donald Trump formally accepted the Republican Party’s presidential nomination at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The presidential election will be held in the United States on November 5.

[jaybee]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)

post snipped...

"Ukraine is, and always will be, at the heart of this government's agenda and so it is only fitting that President Zelenskiy will make a historic address to my cabinet," the prime minister said in a statement shortly before the meeting was convened.

Labour's support lies with Ukraine

Since taking office, Starmer reaffirmed the UK's unwavering support for Ukraine amid its war with Russia.

On Thursday, he announced that Britain would implement a new strategy to hinder Russia's attempts to bypass shipping sanctions. Additionally, Britain imposed sanctions on 11 vessels used for transporting Russian oil.

The new measures target Russia's "shadow fleet" by planning to share data on the network of often older tankers used for shipping Russian oil, enabling identification and action against individual vessels.

He also introduced the Defence Export Support Treaty, set to be signed by defense ministers, which will allow Ukraine to access £3.5 billion ($4.5 billion) in export finance to strengthen both countries' defense industries and increase production.

Last week at a NATO meeting, Starmer reaffirmed a commitment made by his predecessor, Conservative Rishi Sunak, to provide £3 billion annually in military support to Ukraine until 2030-31 and potentially beyond if necessary.

Labour to maintain decision allowing Kiev to hit targets in Russia

The new UK Labour government will not reverse the decisions of its Conservative predecessor regarding allowing Kiev to strike targets on Russian territory with weapons provided by London, the Financial Times reported last week.

In June, the United States and some other countries, including the UK under Rishi Sunak's premiership, allowed Kiev to use Western-donated weapons to strike inside Russian territory.

The newspaper mentioned that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer signaled that the UK arms must be used in accordance with international humanitarian law for defense, but it will be up to Kiev to decide how to use the ammunition.

"Today and tomorrow and the next day is all about standing together with our allies, discussing practically how we provide further support for Ukraine," Starmer told reporters before he headed to Washington to attend NATO's 75th-anniversary summit.

no I can't say anything nice about the new Labour Government YET when it comes to their warmongering for the Globalists and Western based Deep State...

They clearly are still fully on board with the Globalist Agenda and the desire to convert and absorb Russia into the One World Government - while at the same time getting control of Russian natural resources...

and never mind how this affects the British People and how the money could be better spent...

looks like they will continue money laundering for the Military Industrial Complex - and the MIC won't be letting them off the hook any time soon.....

:/

[Tintin]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
https://x.com/mfa_russia/status/1814055761124761958

Text:

NOTE: Originally published on July 13, 2024 by Compact dubbed in German.

This 80-minute interview lead to the German government outright banning the entire publication and harassing the media's associates only 2 days after the video was published. Among the many topics touched upon in the interview were facts about the origin of the crisis in Europe and developments in the Kiev regime-controlled Ukraine since 2014, its war on the people of Donbass that lasted for nearly 8 years as well as the topic of NATO non-enlargement promises given in the early 1990s and the terrorist attack on the Nordstream pipelines and the hard fact that should the German authorities wished it, the remaining line could go operational in a matter of a month, thus alleviating Germany's dire need for energy.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_ix_CTP5tuw

Excellent - thanks for finding and sharing this. Just saving it now for the archives

[christian]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
NOTE: Originally published on July 13, 2024 by Compact dubbed in German.

This 80-minute interview lead to the German government outright banning the entire publication and harassing the media's associates only 2 days after the video was published.

The banning of Compact coincided with police raids on several private homes and offices all over Germany. It was a concerted action, planned long in advance. The government's stated reason for the ban was Compact's continued spread of hate against foreigners. In the words of the government, Compact propagates "a völkisch-nationalist concept of society that excludes 'ethnic foreigners' from the national population wherever possible."

Compact really does that, but, in my opinion, spreading such opinions should be allowed in a free society. I would expect a fair trial and a conviction before a ban, but Compact was never convicted of anything, the ban was arbitrary. In any case, the ban was certainly not a consequence of Compact's interview with Russia's Maria Zakharova. The interview just happened to be the last (or one of the last) that was uploaded to Compact's YouTube channel before it was shut down.

[christian]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)

This is propaganda indeed, but from Russia.

Shoes are different, pants are different, blood stains are different. These are two different people.