*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[norman]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by jaybee (here)
just call me a quick fake dot spotter .... re Trump himself being part of the staging... with a blood capsule at the ready when the bullets started flying around like something from The OK Corral in the Wild West...

Clearly stated - thanks.

My bias leans more than most people toward believing weird conspiracy theories than it does toward believing in miracles. But that's just me ... y'all reading this may be grateful you don't have that particular bias, to the extent and in the direction I do. (It's made for an interesting life however .)

I remain open to the possibility that Trump knowingly burst a blood capsule over his right ear ... however even I have trouble figuring out how he or his trustworthy inner staff would risk putting him in such a shooting gallery of live fire.

If Trump activated a device that blew a hole in his own ear, it would have made a sound the microphone picked up. (?)

Is there such a sound ?

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by norman (here)
If Trump activated a device that blew a hole in his own ear, it would have made a sound the microphone picked up. (?)

I see no need for an explosion. A sharp blade, perhaps curved like a potato peeler, would suffice. If Trump had sprayed some Novocaine on his ear before coming out to speak, then it would be painless and easily done even by Trump himself, just after he hit the deck. This is the sort of showmanship that a man of Trump's temperament and WWE wrestling familiarity could easily pull off.

(Yes - I said "burst a blood capsule" earlier and use a "sharp blade" now ... my speculations continue to shift - sorry.)

[ThePythonicCow]

Jim Willie, the Golden Jackass, has the best analysis of the Trump assassination attempt, including the Secret Service (compromised under Obama), the FBI and CIA (trying to kill Trump), and the risk that Trump took to expose the Secret Service corruption to the White Hat military.

There are three groups that present a serious lethal threat to Trump in his second term:

1) CIA/Intelligence/FBI: They got "their guy", JD Vance as VP, so Trump will be safe from them so long as Trump doesn't threaten the CIA and their push for more surveillance authority. If Trump pushes the CIA too hard, Trump dies.

2) Rockefeller/Big Pharma (agents Obama and Jill Biden): Either Trump backs off from his stated goal of Nuremberg style trials of the genocidal Big Pharma COVID/vaccine campaign, or Trump dies

3) Military/industrial complex - they need their continued rich contracts in Ukraine or wherever.

Jim Willie covers the assassination attempt and its connections to the above powerful groups between the 21:34 and 40:45 marks of:

• Jim Willie: Trump Inside Job, Vaccine Problems, Poison

[Bill Ryan]

Mike Adams posted this update 24 hours ago. He now has 6 audio files (including the ones Chris Martenson has been analyzing), and concludes that 10 (ten) shots were fired, the last being the one that took out Crooks, the only round fired by Secret Service.

https://brighteon.com/268b2dc3-e9f9-...8-184ad5a383ed

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/268b2dc3-e9f9-4089-95a8-184ad5a383ed

[ThePythonicCow]

.
Now, using my over-active conspiracy theory brain lobe, let me expand on the above noted comments of Jim Willie with my own speculations ...

Trump figured he HAD to get the Secret Service back on mission ... get it back to the SS that Dan Bongino knew and remove the DEI (==> DIE) globalist driven corruption. Trump wouldn't have a chance to survive the above powerful enemies if even his Secret Service (the security force imposed on him and that took out JFK) was prepared to kill him. Trump has to do some more serious house cleaning this second term and will need better, more trustworthy, security.

As Jim Willie explains, Trump is forced to use the Secret Service, even while campaigning now. The law allows the Secret Service to take actions and avoid legal liability that a private security force can't do. If you're using a private force and things go south, big time, the legal liability would wipe out even a Trump, and would be practically uninsurable.

So Trump had to setup the Secret Service ... had to get them to run a real assassination attempt so he could catch them "in the act", while the White Hat military was tracking their treason, preparing to bring some serious "justice" to the worst of the lot.

For the last couple of days, I've been unable to imagine that Trump and his inner trusted staff would risk stepping into the kill zone setup in Butler, PA.

Now I've shifted back. Too many highly skilled snipers missed easy shots. Multiple snipers had, for them, easy shots at Trump's head, while he was standing initially, after he ducked with his head still visible to the AGR buildings, after he insisted on standing back up to shout "Fight, fight, fight", and while getting into his armored vehicle relying on poorly trained substitute security.

The snipers missed - deliberately - Trump would be dead six ways from Sunday otherwise. Whomever the patsy was (Crooks or Yearick?) might have been shooting blanks or mentally debilitated, or deliberately shot from behind by a compliant sniper, as soon as the shooting began. The first shot, from the water tower, that got the key sniper team off their scopes for several seconds, but did seriously wound a couple of people in the southern bleacher, must also have been a deliberate miss ... it would have been way too easy a shot if intended to hit one of those two snipers on the northern shed roof behind Trump.

This also explains why someone appearing as a Secret Service agent urgently cleared out all the photographers that were right behind Trump, on the ground between the podium and the central bleacher, just before the shooting began. The show absolutely could not risk a photographer getting a clear shot of Trump's right ear, still unharmed, just before Trump's right hand covered it.

So I'm back to the theory that Trump (and or one of the still actually trustworthy and competent SS agents who jumped on him the fastest) deliberately cut his ear. Trump had to trust that the real snipers had been "persuaded" to shoot elsewhere (including a head shot into someone in the crowd ... to keep things real, bloody, deadly and terrifying.) Perhaps the snipers figured that having White Hat protection, after the assassination attempt failed, was a safer role than having Black Hat protection in either outcome.

This is much the same strategy as Trump is using to clean up elections, the southern border, and many globalist aligned politicians and government agents, and it's the strategy he will be using to clean up our debt based monetary system, which is currently over burdened by debt. Motivate the cure by cranking up the pain.

Our monetary system will return to central bank gold backing. The coming financial crash, over the next year or so, will be one for the ages. Anyone still overly invested in debt-money based assets will risk great loses.

[Ernie Nemeth]

What's happening around here?

There was a purposeful hole opened up in the security perimeter to allow the shooter access to the kill zone.

Who done it, we might not know, but the idea of Trump setting it up is conspiracy theory to the nth degree.

Incredibly irresponsible conjecture without a bit of evidence.

Sure, and JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald...

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
What I (and John Cullen) are calling the second shot does not even show up on the audio tracks analyzed by Mike Adams and Chris Martenson. It was too far away from Trump's microphone for the ultrasonic shock wave of the bullet to show up, and the subsequent report of the rifle that shot it would have arrived at Trump's microphone at practically the same time as the first shot (that was fired from the water tower).

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Mike Adams posted this update 24 hours ago. He now has 6 audio files (including the ones Chris Martenson has been analyzing), and concludes that 10 (ten) shots were fired, the last being the one that took out Crooks, the only round fired by Secret Service.

Mike Adams and Chris Martenson are still missing what John Cullen calls the "first" shot, fired from the water tower. As I explained in the above quoted post, that water tower shot won't show up on audio analysis that Mike and Chris are doing. Rather one has to do the visual analysis of "kinetic reactions" to the water tower shot, as John Cullen did, to identify that shot.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Mike Adams posted this update 24 hours ago. He now has 6 audio files (including the ones Chris Martenson has been analyzing), and concludes that 10 (ten) shots were fired, the last being the one that took out Crooks, the only round fired by Secret Service.

https://brighteon.com/268b2dc3-e9f9-...8-184ad5a383ed

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/268b2dc3-e9f9-4089-95a8-184ad5a383ed

I've concluded my theory as 10 shots fired a couple of days ago, with the ninth shot being the one that killed Crooks (shot from the second story window) Crooks was basically shot behind his right ear and the blown out exit wound out his left temple area. (there's photos)

I should probably post my updated theory. I'm still trying to figure out that final 10th shot, it seems to serve no purpose, unless the sniper behind Trumps left was ordered to fire that shot so they would have that miracle sniper shot story to use and hide the shot fired from the 2nd story window?

We'll never know what exactly happened though, that is the only thing I'm certain of.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
Incredibly irresponsible conjecture without a bit of evidence.

I currently see fairly convincing reasons, which I presented above, for my conjecture. I welcome topical rebuttals. Having a listen to the Jim Willie segment that I described in my preceding post might help one grasp the powerful interests at play here.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Because we now learn, ... eight shell casing were collected from the roof

[*]What groups would we trust to conduct a full and honest investigation:

if you said "FBI", I'm giving you a failing grade on this test

I've little doubt the FBI will do as honest a job here as they did in 1963, where they moved heaven and earth to sell the lone-gunman theory; that a malcontent communist called Oswald fired three shots at the President's motorcade from the sixth storey window of the School Book Depository. And looky here, there are the casings from the three shots he fired:



We all know the "magic bullet" rubbish that followed.

Doubt and speculation still swirls around Dallas, and that's thanks to the lies we've been told. The official story has Oswald in the sniper's nest, but there isn't a shred of evidence to prove it. In fact, more evidence exists for the contrary, that at the time of the assassination Oswald was down in the break room on the second floor. Today, we're in a far more favourable position. Today, we have abundant photography of the incident, and can place Crooks on the roof, with a gun. The Dallas shooting purports anywhere from three to seven shots, but we have only witness testimony to go on, no acoustic record. We do with the attempt on Trump.

My point being, unlike '63, there's an army, a legion, of independent researchers poring over this incident worldwide. That did not exist in 1963. It wasn't until 1975 that the Zapruda film was shown on TV. Today, cellphone footage of Trump's shooting was on the net within minutes showing Crooks climbing onto the roof, of wandering the grounds earlier in the day -- establishing his presence beyond doubt, while highlighting the short-comings of the SS, and so on. Citizen journalism at its best, a movement the FBI and their ilk despise, but ironically helped create.

We have whistleblowers too, and independent experts in many fields, waiting and ready to step forward. It's happening in real-time right now on twitter -- it's the driving force of the unfolding narrative, a point raised in the hearing yesterday. By contrast the FBI is chasing their tail. If a conspiracy exists (and I strongly suspect it does -- a conspiracy to assassinate Trump), I've every confidence it will emerge, and perhaps sooner rather than later. Even Senators don't trust the FBI anymore...little surprising after the fiasco that was JFK, 9/11, Epstein, Hunter's laptop, Russia-Russia-Russia, and a million more examples.

[Satori]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
.
Now, using my over-active conspiracy theory brain lobe, let me expand on the above noted comments of Jim Willie with my own speculations ...

Trump figured he HAD to get the Secret Service back on mission ... get it back to the SS that Dan Bongino knew and remove the DEI (==> DIE) globalist driven corruption. Trump wouldn't have a chance to survive the above powerful enemies if even his Secret Service (the security force imposed on him and that took out JFK) was prepared to kill him. Trump has to do some more serious house cleaning this second term and will need better, more trustworthy, security.

As Jim Willie explains, Trump is forced to use the Secret Service, even while campaigning now. The law allows the Secret Service to take actions and avoid legal liability that a private security force can't do. If you're using a private force and things go south, big time, the legal liability would wipe out even a Trump, and would be practically uninsurable.

So Trump had to setup the Secret Service ... had to get them to run a real assassination attempt so he could catch them "in the act", while the White Hat military was tracking their treason, preparing to bring some serious "justice" to the worst of the lot.

For the last couple of days, I've been unable to imagine that Trump and his inner trusted staff would risk stepping into the kill zone setup in Butler, PA.

Now I've shifted back. Too many highly skilled snipers missed easy shots. Multiple snipers had, for them, easy shots at Trump's head, while he was standing initially, after he ducked with his head still visible to the AGR buildings, after he insisted on standing back up to shout "Fight, fight, fight", and while getting into his armored vehicle relying on poorly trained substitute security.

The snipers missed - deliberately - Trump would be dead six ways from Sunday otherwise. Whomever the patsy was (Crooks or Yearick?) might have been shooting blanks or mentally debilitated, or deliberately shot from behind by a compliant sniper, as soon as the shooting began. The first shot, from the water tower, that got the key sniper team off their scopes for several seconds, but did seriously wound a couple of people in the southern bleacher, must also have been a deliberate miss ... it would have been way too easy a shot if intended to hit one of those two snipers on the northern shed roof behind Trump.

This also explains why someone appearing as a Secret Service agent urgently cleared out all the photographers that were right behind Trump, on the ground between the podium and the central bleacher, just before the shooting began. The show absolutely could not risk a photographer getting a clear shot of Trump's right ear, still unharmed, just before Trump's right hand covered it.

So I'm back to the theory that Trump (and or one of the still actually trustworthy and competent SS agents who jumped on him the fastest) deliberately cut his ear. Trump had to trust that the real snipers had been "persuaded" to shoot elsewhere (including a head shot into someone in the crowd ... to keep things real, bloody, deadly and terrifying.) Perhaps the snipers figured that having White Hat protection, after the assassination attempt failed, was a safer role than having Black Hat protection in either outcome.

This is much the same strategy as Trump is using to clean up elections, the southern border, and many globalist aligned politicians and government agents, and it's the strategy he will be using to clean up our debt based monetary system, which is currently over burdened by debt. Motivate the cure by cranking up the pain.

Our monetary system will return to central bank gold backing. The coming financial crash, over the next year or so, will be one for the ages. Anyone still overly invested in debt-money based assets will risk great loses.

Under your theory of the case, and if in fact innocent people were shot and at least one killed, would Trump be an accessory to murder and attempted murder, not to mention a slew of other crimes?

[Gwin Ru]

...

... beside all the $$ deals and control take-overs, there's also the biblical mimicry angle:

Reader---

"In the Bible the concept of blood on the right ear (Leviticus 8:22-24 and 14:28) serves as a visible mark of consecration, signifying that the person is dedicated to God's service and has been set apart for a specific purpose. This act represents a physical and spiritual transformation, preparing the individual for their sacred role". ----Entering Donald J. Trump,....... "I am the Chosen One."

Leviticus 8:22-24:

And he brought the other ram, the ram of consecration: and Aaron and his sons laid their hands upon the head of the ram.And he slew it; and Moses took of the blood of it, and put it upon the tip of Aaron's right ear, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot. And he brought Aaron's sons, and Moses put of the blood upon the tip of their right ear, and upon the thumbs of their right hands, and upon the great toes of their right feet: and Moses sprinkled the blood upon the altar round about.

https://library.timelesstruths.org/m...but_the_Blood/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Donald wanted his shoes back to protect his big toes after the blood ritual simulacre.... I guess the shoe is made to fit

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1815952099861017042

MJTruthUltra
@MJTruthUltra
Oooo… the coverup always gets ya. 👀

🚨 Senator Chuck Grassley Uncovered Documents that show a SS (UAS) Drone Operator WAS Listed on the Ground Personnel Team — Director Cheatle lied… 🤥

• ALSO, Chuck is directly asking if the Water Tower played any role and was it cleared beforehand. 👀

🔗 Chuck Sauce
https://x.com/chuckgrassley/status/1...435484582?s=46

[Nasu]

Firstly let me say how proud I am of all the contributors to this thread. My suspicion is that the body of evidence in this thread and all the potential unanswered questions will not be in the FBI report. It will simply blame poor leadership, compounded operational mistakes and pure luck on the part of the assassin.

My hope and it is a small hope, is that even a small portion of this thread and the questions it raises will be looked into by either the FBI or senators who care, I'm not holding my breath though.

Collecting brass from one of the shooters visits to the shooting range, also used by Homeland Security wouldn't be hard, for placement later, if a patsy was needed.

As for the sights used by the shooter, Paul points out correctly in my opinion, that in that picture he looks to be looking over his sights. This is not uncommon as the field of view is limited and so to get a good overall view one has to look above the sights before returning to the limited view within any sights. As we see in the footage of the counter sniper teams behind Trump.

As for the sights on the gun they look to me like eotech or holosun red dot sights, or a cheap knock off or something similar, which are suitable for both Close Quarter Battle (CQB, battle in a confined space) and for short to medium operational distances of 100–150 meters / yards. They don't magnify the target at all, or put a lazer on the target, but rather put a small red or green dot on the target through the viewfinder. That being said, for a head shot, they are almost useless at that range, rather they are used for center mass shots or torso or body shots.

In short a very very poor choice of sights for the distance, even such a short one, especially for a head shot.......x.... N

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
So I'm back to the theory that Trump (and or one of the still actually trustworthy and competent SS agents who jumped on him the fastest) deliberately cut his ear.

I'm more conspiratorially minded than most, but a Trump-led conspiracy to 'stage a failed assassination attempt' doesn't add up at all.

The event was live, there were cameras everywhere. Also an army of citizen cell-phones to the left, right, and behind the podium. Altogether, a lot of lenses pointing in the direction of this sleight of hand routine.

The risk of detection is therefore supremely high: they'd have no guarantee someone wouldn't capture (and instantly upload to twitter) the moment he sliced his own ear, or the SS guy did, before applying a liberal squirt of fake blood.

Personally, I believe there is zero chance this was staged, that Trump had foreknowledge, had anything to do with it whatsoever, that he would for one second even countenance such a devilish scheme and of such elaborate theatre -- one that would involve exposing himself to live crossfire, counting on so many intricate moving parts, many beyond his control, where a single slip, a single error, a single miss-timing, could/would spectacularly expose the entire charade, destroying Trump and his movement forever, while at the same time sacrificing the innocent lives of patriots, his supporters...just for a scoop, a boost in the polls (which he hardly needs), or any other justification one could think up.

Of course everyone's welcome to their opinion, but mine, having ploughed many a furrow through the deep, muddy fields of conspiracy, and for many a long year, says there's as much weight to the 'staged' theory as a single proton in an inter-galactic void of nothingness.

I personally don't believe it's possible in any way, shape, or form. But that's just me...

[mountain_jim]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
So I'm back to the theory that Trump (and or one of the still actually trustworthy and competent SS agents who jumped on him the fastest) deliberately cut his ear.

I'm more conspiratorially minded than most, but a Trump-led conspiracy to 'stage a failed assassination attempt' doesn't add up at all.

The event was live, there were cameras everywhere. Also an army of citizen cell-phones to the left, right, and behind the podium. Altogether, a lot of lenses pointing in the direction of this sleight of hand routine.

The risk of detection is therefore supremely high: they'd have no guarantee someone wouldn't capture (and instantly upload to twitter) the moment he sliced his own ear, or the SS guy did, before applying a liberal squirt of fake blood.

Personally, I believe there is zero chance this was staged, that Trump had foreknowledge, had anything to do with it whatsoever, that he would for one second even countenance such a devilish scheme and of such elaborate theatre -- one that would involve exposing himself to live crossfire, counting on so many intricate moving parts, many beyond his control, where a single slip, a single error, a single miss-timing, could/would spectacularly expose the entire charade, destroying Trump and his movement forever, while at the same time sacrificing the innocent lives of patriots, his supporters...just for a scoop, a boost in the polls (which he hardly needs), or any other justification one could think up.

Of course everyone's welcome to their opinion, but mine, having ploughed many a furrow through the deep, muddy fields of conspiracy, and for many a long year, says there's as much weight to the 'staged' theory as a single proton in an inter-galactic void of nothingness.

I personally don't believe it's possible in any way, shape, or form. But that's just me...

I strongly agree with every word of this post

I have been researching conspiracies since before there was a web-based internet or browsers, with my start being the alt.conspiracy and alt.conspiracy.jfk Usenet newsgroups.

later update (woo): unless the staging was done by beings/consciousnesses with greater controls over our time and space and projecting this scene of this movie to wake us all up, something that neither Trump nor any of us normal humans normally have access to or knowledge of.

For that type of awakening to be true the human evil/dark side involved in this attempt were 'allowed' to proceed and will need to be totally exposed somehow.

very long odds of all that, it seems to me.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1816122980272918628

Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
"Why was President Trump not kept off the stage?"

NEW: FBI Director Wray is confronted about the Secret Service failing to protect Trump from a shooter it knew about 20 MINUTES before the assassination attempt.

"We don't know the answer to that."


https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1816119567585804477

Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
JUST IN: Democrat Jerrold Nadler just tried to blame Republicans for the Trump assassination attempt

https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1816119996298252732

Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
·
59m
Nadler refers to the infamous "bloodbath" hoax. Donald Trump was clearly talking about economics.

It had nothing to do with political violence.

The Democrats have become the party of lying creeps

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1816124678781465022

Benny Johnson

@bennyjohnson
FBI Director Chris Wray refuses to answer if there was any evidence that suggests there were other cooperators in the assassination attempt against President Trump:

WRAY: "We are investigating the shooter to both determine his motive and his preparations .. The investigation is ongoing."

REP. DAN BISHOP: "The country went for years with the understanding that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.. and the whole time the FBI had the laptop.."


https://x.com/PaulHook_em/status/1816125112778957023

[Nasu]

What a load of crap. FBI Director Cris Wray can only answer "some" questions about the shooter but nothing about the Secret Service which apparently is outside of his investigation. Ditto the Director of the SS, can't speak to things that the FBI are investigating. What a farce.

If I was Iran or someone bad plotting against any member of congress I would be rubbing my hands with glee. Basically any well trained team with five people or more, prepared to die for the cause, can probably take out anyone, given what we have learned over the past two weeks. Shocking, to say the least.

[T Smith]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

So Trump had to setup the Secret Service ... had to get them to run a real assassination attempt so he could catch them "in the act", while the White Hat military was tracking their treason, preparing to bring some serious "justice" to the worst of the lot.

I envisaged something similar to your hypothesis here. But I was just wildly speculating.

But if this theory bears any weight at all--it seems to me--there is no better time than now to expose the "real" assassination plot (and all the fu*kery we've all endured since 2020)--including all who orchestrated and executed the plot from the ground up to its upper-most echelons. I have to assume this would implicate the WH, the DNC, RINOs--among many other things we may not even be considering--and potentially up to 90% of congress, etc., and all their handlers.

We've heard for years now the White Hats have all the irrefutable receipts to expose the rigged 2020 election, but have put this mission on a slow burn due to the chaos, civil unrest--even catastrophic civil war that would ensue if these receipts were exposed. In short, the truth would literally tear the country apart, the cure being worse than the disease. Or so goes the reasoning.

My point is, I would argue the public is ready and willing to hear it all now and is now perfectly primed for the unveiling, including the normies. Enough on the waiting until the "people are ready" to hear the truth (to channel my inner Kerry Cassidy)... The country just had its near death experience... How much closer to death do we all need to come? (BTW, the same applies regardless if there was White Hat involvement or not)... This was clearly a Deep State assassination attempt. Time to officially call it that, expose the treason, and root out the criminals.

Also, I'm somewhat unsure how well your scenario dovetails with the death of Cory Comperatore. Are we to consider him but a casualty of war? Or a flaw/mishap in the execution of exposing the assassination plot? Or was his death staged? Based on the evidence (multiple eye witness reports of brain matter, etc.,) I find the latter possibility implausible. At least until further evidence emerges that might convince otherwise. I'm not saying I do not understand warfare with stakes this high may require wargaming and strategies that unavoidably shed innocent blood, but in order to consider the possibility of this we do have to go there.