*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
This may be a stretch, but, could it be possible that the majority of the replacements on Trumps security detail July 13th were a part of this battalion of possibly compromised agents??????

From my perspective, Dept Homeland Security (DHS), Justice Dept (including FBI), Secret Service (SS) and much of the rest of the U.S. federal government is compromised, from the Cabinet level on down, with dark hat, deep state, globalists, and has been increasingly so over my lifetime, at least.

The failure of the assassination attempt against Trump is exposing them to grievous stress.

[s7e6e]

The bull**** never has just one but endless layers of "truth". The second one gets exposed as a lie, the next one takes its place. Trump's screen play is just a layer, the only assassination attempt was on general public's common sense and it succeeded.

It's really a shame CIA stopped using Hellfires and switched to ridicule for assassinations.

[norman]

So was it the 'White hats' that spun us off on a wrong path about who Sniper Team 2 shot on the roof ? ( in Cahoots with the crooked FBI [?] )

And/or . . . was that very long delay before the last shot a waiting period while some roof body swapping was done ?

How fast does blood dry ? How long after the shooting was the photo taken ?

These questions seem dull maybe, while the focus is on how miraculously lucky Trump was to dodge a professional sniper's kill shot, but there's a story and connections behind Maxwell Yearick being the dead body on the "Crooks" roof that every agency in the land doesn't want us exploring right now. Why's that ?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by norman (here)
So was it the 'White hats' that spun us off on a wrong path about who Sniper Team 2 shot on the roof ? ( in Cahoots with the crooked FBI [?] )

And/or . . . was that very long delay before the last shot a waiting period while some roof body swapping was done ?

How fast does blood dry ? How long after the shooting was the photo taken ?

These questions seem dull maybe, while the focus is on how miraculously lucky Trump was to dodge a professional sniper's kill shot, but there's a story and connections behind Maxwell Yearick being the dead body on the "Crooks" roof that every agency in the land doesn't want us exploring right now. Why's that ?

~~~

But the ears are surely very very different?

[Ewan]

Posted by Bruce G Charlton (here)
This has been such a rapid-posting thread I have probably missed someone making exactly this point, but anyway...

If the picture from the New York Times photographer of the bullet going past DT's head is genuine (and maybe it is not), and it was indueed captured during an 8000 images per second burst, then this is strong evidence that the photographer, hence the NYT, were expecting the assassination attempt at a very specific time, and the organizers were attempting to get a photographic image of DT's head exploding.

***

From Ann Barnhardt:

Professional photographer sends: NYT photographer was set up to shoot super-high speed… as if to capture Trump’s head exploding
🚨 NYT CAUGHT RED-HANDED? 🚨

Their photographer captured the bullet whizzing past Trump settings you’d use to capture a HEAD EXPLODING.

Camera was set at 1/8000 second shutter and f/1.6

Coincidence? Experts are raising serious questions. #AssassinationPlot #NYT #FalseFlag pic.twitter.com/qmCj7PwswM

— 459 Crimes (@459Crimes) July 18, 2024

Ann-

I can tell you. In all my years of photography. I never set a camera to 1/8000th of s second shutter. Only specialized lenses have apertures that go into the 1.4, 1.6, 1.8 range with the “fastest” greatest opening lens being about, .9. You need a LOT of light (light broad daylight) to shoot at 1/8000th of a second. You could never capture it indoors. This also would have been shot in rapid succession so there would be at least 30-40 frames BEFORE and AFTER this photograph which would allow investigators to actually track exact trajectory. (or see other bullets). I agree that the when the FBI director says “shrapnel or glass” there is a deep, DeepState issue.

I say again: all of the talk, bluster and outrage in the media and from Washington DC garbage humans about “incompetence” is pure head-fake.
The attempted assassination of Trump was meticulously planned, down to making sure that Zabraham Apruder was front-and-center with his shutter speed set to unthinkably fast levels, and that he was leaning on the shutter when Lee Harvey Asperger open fired so that Clown World would have their snuff reel of Trump’s brains being aerosolized to terrorize humanity with.

------

I don't know your muzzle velocity (presumably you can find out) but assuming it's around 800 m/s yes, around the 10000 mark. That's the highest rate we needed to use for ballistic research a while back. The bullet will still move 8cm. per frame, though, even then.

From this link.

Note: They were discussing this in 2011, newer/next generation cameras can appear every two to three years so more cameras will be capable of such pictures now. Why anyone would be shooting at that speed might beg the question 'was he expecting something?'.

=========================================

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
As for this "Magic Bullet" captured whizzing by Trumps head, I find it odd he was at 1/8000sec, F/1.6, ISO-50, but, I don't really see it as being freak settings to be at.

Is that "streak" showing the bullet itself, or is it showing a cloud of condensation formed by and left behind by the shock wave of the supersonic bullet?

I'd guess that clouds move slower than rifle bullets, so would be easier to capture on video.

The Sony A1 is a beast of a camera. He was likely shooting 30 frames per second. Even so, capturing a vapor trail of a bullet is quite astonishing, not impossible, but the timing is a miracle in itself....

ADDED: no normal professional camera can photograph a bullet in flight, a vapor trail is even highly unlikely, but not impossible.
One would need specialized high speed video/camera equipment that costs a fortune to actually capture a bullet in flight (done in a controlled setting).

Actually they can. Nikon-z9-is-so-fast-it-can-capture-a-speeding-bullet/

[Ewan]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by norman (here)
So was it the 'White hats' that spun us off on a wrong path about who Sniper Team 2 shot on the roof ? ( in Cahoots with the crooked FBI [?] )

And/or . . . was that very long delay before the last shot a waiting period while some roof body swapping was done ?

How fast does blood dry ? How long after the shooting was the photo taken ?

These questions seem dull maybe, while the focus is on how miraculously lucky Trump was to dodge a professional sniper's kill shot, but there's a story and connections behind Maxwell Yearick being the dead body on the "Crooks" roof that every agency in the land doesn't want us exploring right now. Why's that ?

~~~

But the ears are surely very very different?

This is an excellent point, and is true of all US Presidents as we well know.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
But the ears are surely very very different?

The bottom half of the right ear looks like Maxwell Yearick's right ear might look if he took out that earplug, and perhaps then had a surgeon stitch up the hole.

The upper half of the right ear might well look more like Cooks ear ... I've not checked that detail out ... but have heard comments on some video(s), sometime in the last week, making claims to that effect.

Some of those same videos speculated that it wouldn't be surprising if somewhere in our intelligence agencies there were some people skilled in Photoshop or similar image editing software, who could "paste" an image of part of Person A's ear into an image of Person B's head, replacing the corresponding part of that ear in B's head.

One analyst I listened to also commented on the resolution and dimensions of this image, claiming that (1) it was lower resolution than one might expect to come directly from any decent cell phone, and that (2) the aspect ratio of its horizontal and vertical sizes was not typical for any normal camera cell phone image. That analyst speculated that the original cell phone image, in a higher resolution, had the above speculated "Photoshop" editing done on it, replacing the top of the right ear, and that the image was then cropped, perhaps to hide "inconvenient" details (a second gun shot wound?) and "blurred" (resolution lowered), perhaps to hide any imperfections in the ear image editing just done.

If I recall correctly, the video we have of some military looking people (and then a man in a dark suit joining them) on that AGR building roof, standing around "Cooks" corpse, starts some 20 or so minutes after the shooting. There's no telling what transpired in the interim, on that roof (at least, no one is telling us.)

We are not dealing with Sherlock Holmes level crime scene investigators here. We are dealing with skilled intelligence (and Justice/FBI/SS) propaganda agents, and similar state, county and local officials, "investigating" the scene of a major crime (trying to assassinate a U.S. President, and shooting a few others, killing one) that they might well have just committed, facilitated, or willfully or incompetently allowed to happen, and what's more we're dealing with at least a half dozen such local, county, state and federal agencies, who won't hesitate to "cover their own butts" at the expense of some other agency's reputation.

In such cases (of which we've had too many in my lifetime), here's a rule of thumb I've found useful: I don't know what really happened, but it's never whatever we were first told.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Ewan (here)
This is an excellent point, and is true of all US Presidents as we well know.

Excuse my being dense ... but my reading of your words is that you're observing that US Presidents surely have very very different ears ... huh ?

Clearly I missed something in your words.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Ewan (here)

Posted by Bruce G Charlton (here)
I say again: all of the talk, bluster and outrage in the media and from Washington DC garbage humans about “incompetence” is pure head-fake.
The attempted assassination of Trump was meticulously planned, down to making sure that Zabraham Apruder was front-and-center with his shutter speed set to unthinkably fast levels, and that he was leaning on the shutter when Lee Harvey Asperger open fired so that Clown World would have their snuff reel of Trump’s brains being aerosolized to terrorize humanity with.

I'm not sure I got the who-said-what quoting right ... but my working theory agrees with that in the above quote, with a nod of appreciation toward the creatively misspelled names.

[Ewan]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Ewan (here)
This is an excellent point, and is true of all US Presidents as we well know.

Excuse my being dense ... but my reading of your words is that you're observing that US Presidents surely have very very different ears ... huh ?

Clearly I missed something in your words.

It was probably me being dense as I had not really followed this thread after the first few pages. I presumed Bill was making a witty remark about Biden's Mysterious Earlobes as we are now analysing Trumps ear/ears also.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Ewan (here)

=========================================

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
As for this "Magic Bullet" captured whizzing by Trumps head, I find it odd he was at 1/8000sec, F/1.6, ISO-50, but, I don't really see it as being freak settings to be at.

Is that "streak" showing the bullet itself, or is it showing a cloud of condensation formed by and left behind by the shock wave of the supersonic bullet?

I'd guess that clouds move slower than rifle bullets, so would be easier to capture on video.

The Sony A1 is a beast of a camera. He was likely shooting 30 frames per second. Even so, capturing a vapor trail of a bullet is quite astonishing, not impossible, but the timing is a miracle in itself....

ADDED: no normal professional camera can photograph a bullet in flight, a vapor trail is even highly unlikely, but not impossible.
One would need specialized high speed video/camera equipment that costs a fortune to actually capture a bullet in flight (done in a controlled setting).

Actually they can. Nikon-z9-is-so-fast-it-can-capture-a-speeding-bullet/

That's quite amazing. The technology in these cameras is advancing so fast I can't even keep up with it anymore.

The Sony A1 is similar to the Nikon Z9

From the article:

Freezing a bullet in a photograph is usually done with the help of special triggers that expose the photo at precisely the correct moment or high-speed cameras that can create ultra-slow-motion footage, but the $5,500 Nikon Z9 can capture 120 frames per second at a resolution of 11 megapixels per image.

“I thought that maybe the Nikon Z9 can catch a bullet as it leaves the rifle,” Strand says. “The bullet from a biathlon rifle has a speed of roughly 350 m/s or ~1,235 km/h (~767 mph), so it isn’t the easiest thing to photograph, but since the Nikon Z9 can go all the way down in exposure time to 1/32000th of a second, I thought that it might work.”

This does have me scratching my head....I suppose one of my camera's can also do this, but I'm not about to try to find out

[SilentFeathers]

A muzzle flash in the window directly beneath Crooks????? Imagine that......

https://x.com/PENELOPENICIA/status/

Added: This clip is better

https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status/

[mountain_jim]

^ One thing that video appears to show, though not sure of the timing, that multiple police vehicles were parked in the viciinity of the water tower, making it seem unlikely that anyone could have gone up there unseen (unless this part of video was shot some time after the shots)

Saw the freeze on a possible flash from a window but this is really hard to watch or make sense of.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
^ One thing that video appears to show, though not sure of the timing, that multiple police vehicles were parked in the viciinity of the water tower, making it seem unlikely that anyone could have gone up there unseen (unless this part of video was shot some time after the shots)

Saw the freeze on a possible flash from a window but this is really hard to watch or make sense of.

I'm going to wait until I see what some other people do with this video, it may actually be doctored. I've always thought from the start of all this that there was a shooter in the window directly beneath Crooks that shot the first 3 shots. But, 1 shaky video won't be enough for me to be completely convinced. I'm hoping Chris Martenson and Mike Adams gets their hands on this video and do an analysis.

Another thing I've noticed is several days ago I seen a couple of videos with people saying right before the shooting they saw that motorcycle pull up there and a cop get off it a walk directly into that same building. Now right after the shooting someone walks out the building and gets on that motorcycle????? Strange.

I'm not even putting the water tower in play anymore, I'm convinced there was no one on it ever. For some reason it was "off limits" to good guys and bad guys.

[Gwin Ru]

...

... John Cullen 🐓’s posts

Pinned

John Cullen

@I_Am_JohnCullen

CNN had forensic audio analyst Rober Maher evaluate the audio.

He places the origin of the 1st shots 360-393 feet from the microphone.

What's the Problem:

"Crooks" body is 475 feet away.

#UhOh #ISeeWhatOthersCant #TheScienceOfWhere

... that goes along fairly well with a shooter at window below roofer...

https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen/status...50907249316233

[Ernie Nemeth]

https://x.com/dlev89/status/

[Gwin Ru]

...

... another miracle:

Trump's doctor releases an update on his recovery from the shooting as ex-president appears without a bandage for the first time in Netanyahu meeting

By Jon Michael Raasch, Political Reporter On Capitol Hill, For Dailymail.Com
Published: 18:15 BST, 26 July 2024 | Updated: 21:09 BST, 26 July 2024

Trump's ear appeared to be normal after the bandages were removed






It is a remarkable turnaround for Trump, who was [blip] in the ear at the rally less than two weeks ago

... anointed alright... with someone else's blood? To conform to those biblical accounts?

[SilentFeathers]

If this is true, it's astonishing they didn't do something about it before Trump even got there. Like physically go to the onsite SS and demand answers, contact other officials and demand answers, etc.

Even this makes no sense....

https://x.com/SpeakerJohnson/status/

[Phoenix1304]

On X now when you watch a video, another one starts playing immediately after it, you can’t see who posted it or find it again, at least I can’t. Very frustrating, but particularly so because around the time of this event, (may even have been the same day) i was watching a vid that then moved onto one in which a long haired dweeb was saying that he hated Republicans, and hated Donald Trump, but “ you got the wrong guy.”. It was Crooks. I was baffled. I have been fully expecting it to surface on this thread and even asked John Kuhles earlier in the thread (assuming he’d seen it because of his exhaustive vid trawling) if he could explain when that was made because Crooks was supposedly shot at the scene. Does anyone know anything about this vid?

I know AI is already messing with us, but this was too weird…

[jaybee]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)

Posted by Alecs (here)
The New York Post is reporting that sources told them the gunman was 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania.



https://nypost.com/2024/07/13/us-new...ring-pa-rally/


Bethel Park is a middle class suburb just south of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

This video was just posted on youtube

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oHDszaeiUDQ

Posted by Phoenix1304 (here)
On X now when you watch a video, another one starts playing immediately after it, you can’t see who posted it or find it again, at least I can’t. Very frustrating, but particularly so because around the time of this event, (may even have been the same day) i was watching a vid that then moved onto one in which a long haired dweeb was saying that he hated Republicans, and hated Donald Trump, but “ you got the wrong guy.”. It was Crooks. I was baffled. I have been fully expecting it to surface on this thread and even asked John Kuhles earlier in the thread (assuming he’d seen it because of his exhaustive vid trawling) if he could explain when that was made because Crooks was supposedly shot at the scene. Does anyone know anything about this vid?

I know AI is already messing with us, but this was too weird…

re the bolded above...


I think it was in the top post above 156 (pg 8) - Sue can maybe confirm ?

I definitely saw it in this thread - and on retrospect I'm surprise more wasn't made of it ... but info was moving fast and somehow it didn't make an impression - for myself I think I thought ...what's that all about - wondering if it WAS actually Crooks - and if it was... how that fitted in with everything - if it WAS Crooks and he made the video saying 'you got the wrong guy' .... then I wouldn't expect him to be alive now.... but it could have been a Deep Fake thing.... and the muddying of the waters had already began....

although on the subject of whether it was Crooks who was the shooter or not....... as the Official Narrative is very much focused on it being him.... and as the agencies involved are all professional liars.... you do have to wonder... ? or he could have been conned into being the Patsy but didn't think he was going to actually assassinate Trump and then die .... he might have thought he was working for the Security team or something - then they planted explosives in his car to point even more at him....

oh I don't know - it can all get a bit much now there are layers of disinfo and redirection and muddying of the waters going on..... :/