*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
A Secret Service counter sniper sent an email Monday night to the entire Uniformed Division (not agents) saying he will not stop speaking out until "5 high-level supervisors (1 down) are either fired or removed from their current positions." The counter sniper also said the agency "SHOULD expect another assassination attempt" before November and complained that he is no longer proud to be a USSS counter sniper after leadership failed the officers at the Trump rally in Butler on 7/13.

"This agency NEEDS to change," the sniper wrote in the email. "If not now, WHEN?

• "The NEXT assassination in 30 days?"

"Sadly we have fallen short for YEARS," the counter sniper lamented. "We just look good doing it. I have conveyed these thoughts to not only supervisors (to include the current Captain of CS, but those responsible for training us (SOTS/CS). Only to be brushed off as those with less experience somehow knew more than me."

"The team I was once proud to be a part of, is something I have to somehow hide as I move into my next career," the counter sniper continued. "Who wants to hire a USSS CS guy who failed? That's the public perception I'm not faced with. The USSS CS team is a stain I will never be able to cleanse."

He concluded with these two lines: "The motto of the USSS...CYA. And every supervisor is doing it right now."

The agency quickly deleted the email, a knowledgeable source told RealClearPolitics.

Full email with name redacted below:

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

• Secret Service Agent Warns Another Assassination Attempt Could Be Imminent:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1om47thhZGA

Fox News' CB Cotton reports the latest on the investigation into the assassination attempt against former President Trump. Former Secret Service agent Richard Staropoli also joined 'Fox & Friends' to discuss the report and the agency's security failures.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Don't mean to belabour the point, but here's a side by side of Crooks.

The two-year gap between images can explain the difference in hair length. But I conclude, with a high degree of confidence, that we're looking at the same individual.

[norman]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
.
The Best Analysis Yet.

Your link isn't working but I found it myself.

https://rumble.com/v592bhg-multiple-...-tpc-1538.html


I agree with everything he lays out except the gun flash in the window, I looked for it in the video and didn't find it, he might be using that still image in the other video that may be altered. That doesn't mean the kill shot sniper wasn't in that space, I very much suspect he was. He's even chosen suspect No 1 out of the Secret Service people there.

At this point, I suspect the gun flash in the window image is a result of the photographer's 'interview' and it's a planted debunkable product to kill the case for the assassin being inside that window.

[norman]

https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status...17137565679772

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1818701419660427510

Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
BREAKING: Video filmed by a Trump PA rally victim shows a person running on top of the roof where Thomas Crooks shot from just moments before Trump was shot in the face.

Holy sh*t.

The video was obtained by Fox News and filmed by James Copenhaver, who was shot twice.

The video was taken at 6:08pm, just three minutes before Crooks opened fire.

It's unclear how the sn*pers did not pick this up.



Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
The snipers did pick it up.

Why is everyone pushing this lie that Secret Service missed the shooter?

@SecretService didn’t miss. They wanted Trump to be assassinated, which is why they let him take the stage while knowing about the shooter. Mayorkas controls Secret Service and he wanted Trump’s head to explode on live television.

It’s time for people to come to terms with the fact that the Biden regime used Alejandro Mayorkas as a tool to assassinate President Trump 5 days before he was set to receive intel briefings again.

Mayorkas needs to be arrested and charged with being an accessory to murder and attempted murder.

Mayorkas is responsible and he will try to murder Trump again if he’s not arrested before November.


Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
·
39m
BREAKING.🚨

Newly released video shows the shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks moving along the rooftop in plain sight before he shot and nearly killed former President Trump.

The Secret Service claims that it didn't see him. 👀

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/1818696794437804033

Okay 𝕏, I’ll play… why does this keep getting deleted?

Crooks’ daddy should tell us who sanitized his house, not even a fingerprint to be found?

👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/52fQD4VfAE

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) July 31, 2024



Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
This is just more evidence that the plot to assassinate President Trump was an inside job by the INTEL AGENCIES and @SecMayorkas.

What type of Parent doesn’t express sorrow over their kid dying? What type of parent doesn’t apologize for their killer kid’s actions?

Makes me think and really wonder if the entire Crooks family was aware their son was utilized by the Deep State and a possible FBI handler for the sake of killing Trump.

Why won’t the FBI talk about the 2nd phone they recovered from Crooks’s home?

What’s on that burner phone they don’t want us knowing about?

Why isn’t anyone asking the family why their son had 3 overseas encrypted bank accounts?

This family is being protected by the Feds.




Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
·
28m
Let me help the Secret Service and FBI with a pro-tip.

The way to stop the public from believing the Trump assassination attempt was an 'inside job' is to actually FALSIFY that it was an 'inside job.'

This requires honesty and transparency. You up to the challenge or not?

Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
·
27m
Because everything coming out of your mouths on this WEEKS LATER is only fueling this public perception.

Come on. Give us the comms, the operational details, the paper trail leading up to it & PROVE the Butler County rally wasn't a massive deviation from protocol.

IF YOU CAN.


Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
We already have witness statements that USSS skipped out on a coordination meeting with Butler County law enforcement. We also have a timeline where it shows locals notifying the shared channel 20 MINUTES before the Trump shooting that Crooks was a threat.

Cheatle, before she hit the road, asserted that the USSS KEPT NO COMMS from the event.

The more deviations from protocol, the more suspect it gets. It's just like the J6 "security failure" all over again.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1818688063872078047

Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
Unexplainable:

Acting Secret Service Director testifies critical 30 second window with counter sniper team...

...warning about a "man on a roof with a gun" got "stuck" or "siloed" in state and local law enforcement channel.

"Stove piping" or "siloed" intel was also blamed for 9/11.

23 years later, billions spent to establish Homeland Security and address "interoperability." Secret Service is a component of DHS.



https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1818674648667566505

Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
JUST IN: Secret Service instructed the local counter-sniper team to set up at "ground level looking into the crowd" but NOT at an elevated position above the AGR building rooftop where Crooks tried to assassination Trump.

This is extremely sus.


My comment from middle of Cullen's latest (link from Norman)
https://rumble.com/v592bhg-multiple-...-tpc-1538.html

When are the SS sniper team members going to be interviewed officially? If they were taking shots, and subsonic shots, shouldn't we be hearing from them?

At 53:20, Cullen says that object flying by on video was the shot that took out Crooks - is that even possible for a cell phone camera to capture?

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1818683630371348587

Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
NEW: Thomas Crooks' father gives a statement after being confronted by Fox News Digital.

Reporter: "Is there any statement you would be willing to share with us right now, Mr Crooks?"

Matthew Crooks: "I gotta pee."

Crooks' parents are unlikely to face criminal charges however civil action may be pursued against them.

The video below was taken this week when Crooks was leaving a Pittsburgh office building where multiple law firms are.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

A zoomed in segment of Crooks walking, or should I stay strolling, across the roof of the AGR building.

SS Snipers had earlier used the excuse that Crooks had been scooching/crawling behind the ridge of the roof and was therefore unobservable.

I would say they were busted:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_OLq-BrVh14

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
And he's the same as this guy:

(captured on on the roof, aiming a rifle)
Attachment 53492

and who ended up as this guy:
Attachment 53493

When did he pull his hair back, so that it wasn't covering his ear?

He doesn't seem to want to move his hair while he was sighting his target. Apparently his hair isn't in his way then.

I doubt he wanted to move his hair after he "suddenly" stopped sighting his target ... he would have had other things "on" (rather "passing rapidly through") his mind then.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
.
The Best Analysis Yet.

He says at 7.50 the guy in the black pants and white shirt is Coperhaven, who is eventually shot.



That's not Coperhaven.

This is Coperhaven, lying on the steps in the grey and red shirt and dark baseball cap.



He's wrong right out of the gate, and it all goes down hill from there.

Cullen proceeds to formulate a grand hypothesis based, seemingly, on the reactions of the crowd. Yes, some spectators flinch, and one guy hits the deck, but that's a natural human reaction to the sudden report of gunfire, irrespective of direction of travel.

But he draws up a bullet path anyway, cutting across the back row of the bleachers. He says it originated from snipers hidden in the trees. That's a hefty conclusion to draw when all you're basing it on is people flinching in the crowd.

I watched no further than this, as he's talking out of arse. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that he was a shill whose purpose was the muddy the narrative. It's what 'they' do, and I choose not to get caught up in their mindgames.

The following is a reasonable -- evidence based -- projection of the first three bullet's trajectory. The first one snicks Trumps ear, hits David Dutch, skims the metal railing, before burying itself in the fork lift's hydraulic line. The second hits Coperhaven, the third Comperatore.

[norman]

How fruitful will it be to zero in on Secret Service being criminally involved. Of course they bloody were. So were elements of the local freemasons ( I mean cops ).

What we have to get to is the bigger network and the people who ran the operation. The Secret Service were not running it, they were operatives/patsies. The cops were not running it either.


And if anybody says Biden, I'll scream.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by norman (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
.
The Best Analysis Yet.

Your link isn't working but I found it myself.

https://rumble.com/v592bhg-multiple-...-tpc-1538.html

Thanks, norman. I fixed my post now (I hope).

Dang - I coulda' sworn that embedded Rumble video was showing fine in my post when I posted it.

Apparently Avalon's Rumble video embedding and myself still don't have a working relationship.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
And he's the same as this guy:

(captured on on the roof, aiming a rifle)
Attachment 53492

and who ended up as this guy:
Attachment 53493

When did he pull his hair back, so that it wasn't covering his ear?

He doesn't seem to want to move his hair while he was sighting his target. Apparently his hair isn't in his way then.

Not sure I follow. Are you suggesting that the guy photographed on the roof, looking down the sight of a rifle, is a different guy to the one who was shot seconds later, by a sniper, in the exact same spot on the roof?

[jaybee]

Posted by norman (here)
How fruitful will it be to zero in on Secret Service being criminally involved. Of course they bloody were. So were elements of the local freemasons ( I mean cops ).

What we have to get to is the bigger network and the people who ran the operation. The Secret Service were not running it, they were operatives/patsies. The cops were not running it either.


And if anybody says Biden, I'll scream.

I think these are the people you are referring to who ran the operation........or their close associates anyway....?

re bolded ---- I'll just hop on my Private Jet and go get 'em....

thread about the Committee of 300

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Not sure I follow. Are you suggesting that the guy photographed on the roof, looking down the sight of a rifle, is a different guy to the one who was shot seconds later, by a sniper, in the exact same spot on the roof?

My understanding of what you are suggesting, with those two photo's, one of the guy on the roof looking down his rifle sight, and the other of a very dead man on the roof with lots of blood on his head and with his right ear showing, are the same man. That's what you are suggesting, same man, right?

Ok - look at the hair of that man.

In the first photo, he has long hair, covering the side of his head. We cannot see any part of his ear.

In the second photo, his hair is pulled back behind his ear, so that we can see his right ear in all it's full glory.

When and how did his hair get moved, from covering his ear, to being tucked behind his ear?

I happen to have long hair at present, and when I tuck it behind, say, my right ear, it normally involves a specific sequence of motions of my right hand and arm. I can imagine that if I got shot in my head unexpectedly, my hair might get messed up, but I am having difficulty imagining how a bullet coming into say the left side of my head, perhaps into my left temple, and leaving perhaps below my right ear or from my neck near there, would cleanly and entirely pull back the hair that had been hanging over and entirely obscuring my right ear from view, so that now my right ear was in full and prominent view.

[jaybee]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
This may of course be nothing. But just a few minutes ago, when Clayton Morris from Redacted was talking about the new video of Crooks running along the rooftop in plain sight (and castigating the FBI), their livestream was suddenly cut dead on both YouTube and Rumble.

The live chats are going nuts, and the feed hasn't yet been restored. A pinned chat notice says they have 'tech issues'. They've been down now for over 10 minutes. (If this was just an innocent tech fault, I'll delete this post.)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T4cO7ffKQJg
https://rumble.com/v597up1-breaking-...redacted-.html

I suggested a few pages ago - that Crooks may have thought he was working for the security team - and might have been - because that way they could get him into position to be the patsy and be shot ....and the more freely he moved around without being challenged the more that could be interpreted that he WAS 'on the team'
- - so they left him alone - ??

dunno - just responding to the live feed going down... but now we have the Streisand Effect so ....?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

edit - not sure if I clicked the wrong thing because now I can't see your post - I thought I 'thanked' it - sorry if I reported you - to yourself accidently - now I'm definitely tired and had better stop...

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
My understanding of what you are suggesting, with those two photo's, one of the guy on the roof looking down his rifle sight, and the other of a very dead man on the roof with lots of blood on his head and with his right ear showing, are the same man. That's what you are suggesting, same man, right?

Without a doubt, yes,

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Ok - look at the hair of that man.

In the first photo, he has long hair, covering the side of his head. We cannot see any part of his ear.

In the second photo, his hair is pulled back behind his ear, so that we can see his right ear in all it's full glory.

When and how did his hair get moved, from covering his ear, to being tucked behind his ear?

An eye-witness might account for that, the one who responded to Dave Stewart when asked "Did they pick him off".

Quote:
"F*ck yeah, I saw a big poof of hair go up in the air."

[Details found in this post]

That was a high-velocity round punching through his skull. It didn't just kill, it obliterated. It doesn't strain the imagination that he'd have a bad hair day afterwards.

Or, maybe, a first responder moved it. We already know they cuffed him (in the bodycam footage we can see his wrists are bound with zip-ties). The first cop on the roof may have moved the hair from his face to check the condition of the subject -- to confirm a kill had been made. In fact, had that long drape of hair been covering it up I would expect someone (sooner or later) to do that.

Are you suggesting that roof-shooter and roof-corpse are two different people?

[Alecs]

Posted by norman (here)
https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status...17137565679772

In case anyone missed it, Paul Abbate (FBI) stated during yesterday's hearing (~3:18.30) that Crooks used an AR-15 style rifle manufactured by Panther Arms.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
He's wrong right out of the gate, and it all goes down hill from there.

Cullen proceeds to formulate a grand hypothesis based, seemingly, on the reactions of the crowd. Yes, some spectators flinch, and one guy hits the deck, but that's a natural human reaction to the sudden report of gunfire, irrespective of direction of travel.

But he draws up a bullet path anyway, cutting across the back row of the bleachers. He says it originated from snipers hidden in the trees. That's a hefty conclusion to draw when all you're basing it on is people flinching in the crowd.

So ... pray tell ... why did the set of people all "flinching" at that same moment only occur in:

(1) several of those all along the back row and
(2) the Secret Service sniper team on the roof of the more northern hanger behind Trump,
(3) while a bullet hit the railing at the end of that row, apparently (from the direction it's puff of smoke forms) having traveled along that back row,
(4) where all those balcony and sniper flinchers form a straight line into the trees south of the water tower where a sniper could easily hide,
(5) all occurring at the same instance, within a fraction of a second, as the first alleged silent, subsonic gunshot was recorded on the audio?

No one elsewhere flinched, at that instant, so far as we know, not even one row below in that balcony. No other bullets were flying about, at that instant, so far as we know.

This does not prove, "beyond the shadow of a doubt", that a bullet flew along that path, but it sure seems to me to be a good working hypothesis, at least until we find other evidence contradicting that hypothesis.

I gather that you have not, yet anyway, offered any contrary evidence.

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
I watched no further than this, as he's talking out of arse.

Thank-you for your careful analysis of the substantial material that this video presents.