*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[SilentFeathers]

This is REALLY STRANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Talk about throwing a mouse some cheese!!!!!

https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
This little parapet would be an ideal hide away for a hypothetical second shooter. Tucked under the parapet he's not visible from the ground from any angle. And once his job was done he could drop to the ground in a couple of seconds and quietly slip in the front door (entrance to building sits directly beneath him). Attachment 53543

At first glance, it seems to me that they would need a rather skinny, petite, sniper to hide below the edge of that parapet, without being visible from the ground below to anyone standing at least a modest distance from the building.

At it's maximum coverage depth, that parapet looks to me to be less than one foot higher than the metal roofing that extends into it.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
This is REALLY STRANGE!!!!!!!!!!!!

Talk about throwing a mouse some cheese!!!!!

https://x.com/RealGeorgeWebb1/status/

For those with busted browsers such as I have, SilentFeathers post refers to a GeorgeWebb tweet with video of a news report and with associated text of:

Yearick’s Iranian Bagman For Antifa Arrested - Metadata Stops on July 12th, one day before Trump Assassination.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Adding this Chris Martenson livestream discussion to our virtual library here

Chris Martenson (Peak Prosperity), in this interview with Gary of Paramount Tactical, nails John Cullen to the wall, on Cullen's "finding another shooter" based on video of a "bullet" traveling about 30 fps near Trump (start at the 21:38 mark):

Expert Post Mortem of the Security Failures at the Trump Rally (starts at 21:38 mark)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ou3B-rsKtP8

[Bill Ryan]

Chis Martenson published another update a couple of hours ago. What struck me strongly was this hypothesis proposed by someone in his research group. Below is a screenshot (shown starting at 19:15 in the video, after which Martenson discusses it in detail).

It suggests a concealed second shooter in the roof space above the windows. The idea on its own proves nothing, of course, but the hypothesis aligns with all the currently available data, with nothing ruling it out. It earned itself a loud-and clear personal bookmark for me, but of course confirming this may be next to impossible.

It's like the storm drain in the JFK assassination, which is where Johnny Roselli was when he took the fatal head shot. (That's absolutely what happened on that day, btw, but it's off-topic on this thread.)



The FBI and Regime Media Work Together to Bury the Investigation

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sN24It6Y9zM

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
It suggests a concealed second shooter in the roof space above the windows.

I've seen reports that that AGR location had been recently sold to another corporation, and that that location was not currently in active use.

If so, that would have made it easier to set up, and then after the fact tear down, such a second location in the roof space. There would be no regular AGR employees coming by every day as part of their normal job who might notice something they "shouldn't" see.

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
[...]

This "image" shows up on my screen with the third "smoke puff" line shifted right a little, as in:
Attachment 53552
Did you intend for the "smoke puff" line to be right shifted thus[...]

I intended no shift between the two lines. It might have been simpler and less confusing to just post it like this:

" ...look what hap-pened..."
.....smoke puff ^-|- ^ shot sound

The puff of smoke occurs on the "Hap-" syllable of the uttered "happened" and the shot sound spike occurs on the "-pened" part of the word.

Trump reaction time was way delayed in his motion to check his ear as the second shot occurred when his hand was over his ear.

So ... am I reading you right? Are you considering my hypothesis (which so far most others have found, to put it politely, quite unlikely) that Trump's ear was not actually injured by a bullet, but rather by some stage craft?

Indeed, that's my current strong tendency.

Ole Dammegard has a bunch of other clues which go along that same vein.


For comparison of when the shots are heard and Trump's reaction, check this video from the front audience (one might need to listen at 1/4 speed to pinpoint shot sounds/word uttered:

[Hermoor]

I'd be keen to hear the opinion of a genuinely independent expert on gunshot wounds. Would he or she consider the apparent wound to Trump's ear realistic? How about the healing time? Why was there no scab or scarring when he took his band aids off less than a fortnight later? Is accompanying damage to the eardrum common or uncommon in these cases?

Here's a photo by Anna Moneymaker. It's shortly after the bodyguards piled on Trump. One of them is already using a hand towel to wipe real blood or fake blood from Trump's ear and face.

https://media.gettyimages.com/id/216...MUcIehxotBgLs=

Three streams of blood were on Trump's cheek and running towards his mouth. The middle one was wiped away, it can be viewed in the photo above. Part of the lower one was also wiped away.

Given the amount of time the bodyguard spent wiping blood away from Trump's ear and cheek, it would have been easy for him to wipe away all the blood from Trump's cheek and around his mouth too. It would only take a second. But it would have also lessened the visual impact of the upcoming Iwo Jima photo op.

Having covered the hand towel in plenty of real or fake blood, the bodyguard then threw the towel on the floor and discarded it.



Surely that can't be standard protocol? Apparently large amounts of Trump's DNA have been left lying around for any Tom, Dick or Harry to get hold of?

All of the photographic images I've seen come from only four photographers: Anna Moneymaker, Evan Vucci, Jabin Botsford and Doug Mills. Are they all freemasons perchance? Who do they really work for? Is intelligence work part of their brief?

All four of them had access to the inner ring of security. All four of them obviously have at least security and intelligence clearance.

Doug Mills got the 'baby Bush hears about 9/11' photo in 2001? That's stinky. He must go to one of the favoured lodges. I've been reading military forums and they say he didn't photograph a bullet. They say he caught the contrail from a bullet, if the image isn't faked. It's a serious stretch that he was using a shutter speed of 1/8000. Even at the claimed f1.6 with an unknown (?) but low ISO. The sun was low and it was directly behind him or to his side. Plus f1.6 will give a razor sharp focal plane on the subject, but the bokeh will totally blur everything else. It's an aperture setting for portraits and totally isolating the subject. It's not for general reportage and photo journalism ffs.

None of the moments and angles I'm particularly interested in have any damn images, or footage. Zip. Nada. That stinks to high hell.

Other pro photographers were present outside the inner ring. I can't find their images anywhere. That really stinks too. Can anyone else find at least some of their images? Those images probably/possibly aren't under the blanket of Reuters, AP and Getty.

General footage clearly showed the presence of other pro photographers. It also showed that more pro video photographers were there than we've seen footage from.

Scores or even hundreds of zombie phones were behind and all around the stage. Where are the images and footage from them? Why wasn't/isn't social media awash with their images and footage of crucial moments and angles?

Are all the folk behind Trump and in the bleachers from rent-a-crowd? Were they approved diehards and crisis actors? Their behaviour after the shots rang out is best viewed with Benny Hill music.

At this stage I still have to, rightly or wrongly, deduce that the whole thing was a work. It was an esoteric ritual and Trump was in on it.

If Trump really was supposed to be assassinated, then going to those extremes and putting all your eggs in the one basket of a nobody kid who couldn't shoot for **** is preposterous.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
It suggests a concealed second shooter in the roof space above the windows.

I've seen reports that that AGR location had been recently sold to another corporation, and that that location was not currently in active use.

If so, that would have made it easier to set up, and then after the fact tear down, such a second location in the roof space. There would be no regular AGR employees coming by every day as part of their normal job who might notice something they "shouldn't" see.

The timing of the property sale or purchase, or delaying the new ownership process of occupancy of the property, etc. could of been actually a part of the overall assassination plot.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Excellent new video from Spa Guy showing, in detail, how and where Crooks accessed the roof and the exact route he took to reach his final position.

His hand marks and shoe-prints are still clearly visible.

This route also tallies with the Coperhaver footage of Crooks in the distance moving across the rooftops.

Updated Drone Analysis: Rooftop Access Butler's Trump Assassination Attempt How Did He Get on Roof?
10 mins

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SEaebA741ds

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Found a possible match for the footwear Crooks was wearing. Such details appear small fry, but if the tread matches the footprints it will conclusively prove that Crooks got up this way, while eliminating the ladder theory or that he climbed out a window. It also exposes the security failures even more keenly -- for the path he took he must have been visible from ground-level as well multiple first floor windows.

These "Skechers Flex Advantage" trainers/sneakers are not an exact match, but it's the closest I could find. I passed this info onto Spa Guy in case it's helpful in his investigation.

[Bill Ryan]

Chris Martenson is going live again right now.

The Abandonment of Posts in the Overwatch Building is Difficult to Accept

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7DccCDp1C9w

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

In response to fears aired by many, I doubt there'll be a second attempt against Trump. 'Last Card' is singular, you don't get to play it twice, not without showing your whole hand, and they can ill-afford that.

Remember Hinkley in '81 who took a shot at Reagan. IMO, that was with the express purpose of elevating Bush, his VP, to the Whitehouse. It failed, and they did not attempt it again, and they won't against Trump (or I hope not). No, if there's going to be another assassination attempt then more likely it'll be against Harris. The successful assassination of the Democrat candidate would play perfectly into their schemes, especially if the patsy is a Maga conservative. And, as a bonus (for certain factions in the party) it would also get Harris off the ticket.

[Hermoor]

Another interview with Ole Dammegard.

I don't currently agree with everything he says, but I appreciate him saying it.

I need to re-evaluate some of my own thinking on the matter, mostly the photographic specifics of the 'Iwo Jima' shot.

Ole totally thinks Trump was in on it. I respect him for saying that. At this stage I'd generally agree with him, but I'm still missing pieces to be fully convinced of it.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jhnazTWyJP7Z/


This was taken a very short time after the band aids came off.

[Delight]

Posted by Hermoor (here)
Another interview with Ole Dammegard.

I don't currently agree with everything he says, but I appreciate him saying it.

I need to re-evaluate some of my own thinking on the matter, mostly the photographic specifics of the 'Iwo Jima' shot.

Ole totally thinks Trump was in on it. I respect him for saying that. At this stage I'd generally agree with him, but I'm still missing pieces to be fully convinced of it.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jhnazTWyJP7Z/


This was taken a very short time after the band aids came off.

Attachment 53559

To my eyes, it looks possible there is an overlaid latex material.

[Hermoor]

Posted by Delight (here)
To my eyes, it looks possible there is an overlaid latex material.

I think so too.

We need an older photo to compare it with.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
In response to fears aired by many, I doubt there'll be a second attempt against Trump. 'Last Card' is singular, you don't get to play it twice, not without showing your whole hand, and they can ill-afford that.

Remember Hinkley in '81 who took a shot at Reagan. IMO, that was with the express purpose of elevating Bush, his VP, to the Whitehouse. It failed, and they did not attempt it again, and they won't against Trump (or I hope not). No, if there's going to be another assassination attempt then more likely it'll be against Harris. The successful assassination of the Democrat candidate would play perfectly into their schemes, especially if the patsy is a Maga conservative. And, as a bonus (for certain factions in the party) it would also get Harris off the ticket.

When I scratch my head and ponder what their next move might be, I ask myself, "What would Hillary do?". She's like one of the top boss rats in the sewer system calling the shots IMO.

I wonder what cards she still is holding. Not many, if any, continue to have a heart beat once on her s**t list. My guess is they'll lock him up at his sentencing in September and try to keep him behind bars until the steal is complete.

Will locking him up until after the election work? I'm not so sure. They've shown us they are willing to kill him, I see no reason why they would stop trying now.

[Bill Ryan]

Just a cross-reference here. For those who have been following the work of John Cullen, Chris Martenson briefly discusses Cullen starting at 21:38 in his livestream conversation of 1 August.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ou3B-rsKtP8

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Just a cross-reference here. For those who have been following the work of John Cullen, Chris Martenson briefly discusses Cullen starting at 21:38 in his livestream conversation of 1 August.

Chris Martenson absolute nailed Cullen to the wall. As a I result of

(1) Martenson's comments here, and (2) Martenson's observation elsewhere that

the "flinch" of almost everyone along the top back row of the southern bleacher at the same instant that a bullet clearly hit the back rail of that bleacher ... that that "flinch" might have been a reaction to having a hand on that back rail as that rifle round hit it (steel stings sharply if hit with a rifle round) ... rather than that "flinch" being evidence as Cullen saw it of a silent (subsonic) rifle round fired from the trees toward the northern sniper team that traveled past the intended target (some Secret Service snipers) and along that back rail ...

I changed my views here on this thread, canceled my Patreon subscription to Cullen, and sent Cullen a message with my key concerns with his work, to which message I have, not surprisingly, heard no response.

Score: Martenson 1, Cullen 0.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Martenson indeed landed a knock-out blow, and he did it with basic mathematics. That's due diligence in action. That's attention to detail -- qualities Cullen doesn't possess.

Cullen either (A) has poor judgement (a moron), or (B) is deliberately skewing the narrative (a disinfo agent). They both equate to the same thing: his information cannot be trusted.