*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[Vangelo]

Listening to the Elon interview...
Trump said that the cop who boosted himself up dropped and hurt his ankle very badly.  This is in conflict with what we saw from the police cam footage shown in Chris Martenson's recent video.

He also said that the Secret Service sniper that shot Crooks targeted him by first seeing the fire from the gun's muzzle.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Vangelo (here)
Trump said that the cop who boosted himself up dropped and hurt his ankle very badly.  This is in conflict with what we saw from the police cam footage shown in Chris Martenson's recent video.

If a hostile sniper turns and points his rifle in your face, from just a few feet away, you might run first and realize your ankle is messed up second.

Given enough adrenaline, most "fight or flight" body parts work just fine, even if seriously torn or broken by ordinary standards.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
It was all scripted!

Ah - yes - but the best scripts are so real that almost all the actors never realize they're acting

In other words, is it "all scripted", if only a handful of participants even know there's a "script" ?

[helium]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Vangelo (here)
Trump said that the cop who boosted himself up dropped and hurt his ankle very badly. This is in conflict with what we saw from the police cam footage shown in Chris Martenson's recent video.

If a hostile sniper turns and points his rifle in your face, from just a few feet away, you might run first and realize your ankle is messed up second.

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Given enough adrenaline, most "fight or flight" body parts work just fine, even if seriously torn or broken by ordinary standards.

Anyone with sufficient experience knows this to be absolutely true. Not many have such experience though. Military training has many goals but one major goal is to train the body/mind to recognize massive adrenaline dumps and to manage them without the kind of symptoms that you can clearly see when that officer runs to his vehicle and fumbles with his weapon, trying to get the magazines in order and to ready the weapon for use. The guy is practically pissing his pants and I suspect he’s thinking twice about leaving the safety of the cover that the vehicle provides. Saturated with adrenaline, the first thing that goes away are motor skills and basic coordination.

Another example would be the female SS operative that can’t seem to re-holster her weapon due to an unanticipated, uncontrolled, unmanaged adrenaline dump.

What you are witnessing here is lack of training.

Another example of lack of training would be evident in the body cam footage of all those guys milling about the building not sure what to do. The guys in tactical gear most likely have military training. The guys in blue perhaps not so much. But all of them are likely the kind of persons who are accustomed to taking orders. When nobody is giving orders they just stand around waiting for orders. None of these guys have trained as a team, nor as professionals working in a large, expansive protective operation such as they were mired in that day.

I hope that none of those local law enforcement people have any involvement or knowledge of a ‘second shooter’ or conspiracy. Their families and everyone they know would be at great risk if that was the case. As for the feds, well, I have less sympathy for them. The LEO’s should not have been put in the position they were in. Nobody can expect street cops, SWAT team members, and state police to be mixed into a pot together and magically become an effective team. Watching that officer fumbling with his weapon was especially excruciating for me because I’ve been there many times and I know what it feels like.

Local law enforcement was hung out to dry that day. They were the other patsy. And yes, any one of them could have done a better job and perhaps prevented loss of life.

Also, I’m not at all surprised that the officer who climbed to the roof could drive up, park his car, and head to the correct position to confront whomever was on the roof. All it would take is one radio communication to give him an idea where to expect a shooter. If a number of citizens standing around the building could see the shooter then it seems totally plausible that an officer with a radio could provide enough detail in a comm so that another officer could respond with a fair degree of accuracy to the right place on the roof.

As far as the sound of the shots recorded by the vehicle camera, the microphone is inside the vehicle which means the sound is filtered, removing high frequencies. Just because the shots sound the same from inside the vehicle doesn’t mean much. It’s higher frequencies that provide most of the directional details of sound. Echoes would be filtered out if they existed in that position where the vehicle was parked. From the stage microphone it’s all too obvious that the first three shots were distinct from the second volley. If there was just one shooter and all shots were fired from that roof position, the difference in sound could have been due to the rifle’s position and the ‘rest’ used by the shooter for the first three shots, vs. the shooter having moved to a slightly different position, perhaps being upright and not using a rest for the rapid firing of the remaining shots.

The three evenly spaced shots were probably too close together to come from a high-power bolt action sniper rifle. I hate to say that because I suspect that there were two shooters and the patsy on the roof simply shot after the first three ‘kill’ shots. Given the relatively short range, though, it’s possible that a professional sniper could have used a semi-automatic rifle (not an AR which is intended for fairly close-quarters) from a concealed position which would explain the very controlled, well spaced three initial shots. I don’t think the kid in sneakers fired those first three shots. And I don’t think the body we see in the video on the roof was hit by a high-power sniper rifle. More likely it was a close-in shot from a hand gun that took out the roof shooter kid. That would be shot ten.

Additionally, I seriously doubt that it was ‘Crooks’ who was seen purchasing a ladder that day, nor a box of ammo. And I have really serious doubts that there was anything like explosives and a detonator involved that weren’t planted by whomever may have benefited from these events if they had resulted in Trump being dead.

The dead kid on the roof was not acting alone. I’d like to think he was and that none of the law enforcement we see were complicit. But I simply can’t buy that story.

The one video that haunts me were those brief moments when the photographers were led from the back of the stage to the front, on purpose, just before shots were fired. That was just too coincidental to ignore.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/GtiWdyT7BRaB


One other thing. I’m agnostic when it comes to Donald Trump. If I put myself in his position though I can’t blame him for not having the kind of detailed knowledge that we have after we’ve spent so much time pouring over all of these videos. Donald has to keep to his script. He will rely on others to provide him with information and that info may not always be entirely true. The Donald has a lot going on in his life. I doubt that he really wants to be stuck in the position he’s in. Considering all that’s gone down since he won the previous election I have to say that he’s done a pretty good job lifting the lid on a reeking, putrid garbage can, revealing what’s simplest to refer to as The Deep State. For all his faults, Trump has done all of us a huge favor.

(to the tune of the intro to the original Star Trek) ‘These are the Chronicles of the Human Awakening – where all lives matter . . .’ And greed, malice, and hatred fade into ancient history.

[helium]

I guess I just can't win, Bill. I thought the font was OK and I didn't try to embed the video since the last time I tried failed.

But thanks and I'll try to do better.

[mountain_jim]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
There doesn't seem to be an opening in the side of this building through which a shooter can fire a weapon

You mean no vents like the two that I added arrows pointing to, in the lower right of this image:

Attachment 53582

If there was a second shooter able to hide and shoot from within a crawl space under that roof, I would be concerned he might be back in there again to finish the job when Trump returns in October.

And I realize it should be much harder then to go unnoticed - have any videos shown whether this building has a drop ceiling with space above?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Except he's got blood on his hand before he even hits the ground. It's very clear in the images.

I don't see clear blood - just a slightly different shade and tint of shadow, where his fingers are most bent.

Maybe these are better. Do you see blood now?

A split second after touching his ear



After rising from the ground

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
It was all scripted!

Ah - yes - but the best scripts are so real that almost all the actors never realize they're acting

In other words, is it "all scripted", if only a handful of participants even know there's a "script" ?

It is scripted so as to drill the other part of the script into the crowd's heads, whether that crowd is made of extras from Central casting or "RentaCrowd":

Techniques Of Propaganda (1949) 9:51

Old TV Time

Mar 1, 2017

Propaganda Techniques by Coronet Instructional Films Shows methods of recognizing and evaluating propaganda and encourages adoption of a judicious, critical attitude toward it. Chuck would like to know whether the election was really "a victory for good government" as the victorious party claimed...
Thanks to avgeeks.com

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OlMS-x7muVY

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by helium (here)
I guess I just can't win, Bill. I thought the font was OK and I didn't try to embed the video since the last time I tried failed.

But thanks and I'll try to do better.

No problem at all! Font Size 1 is just way too small for my own eyes to read easily, and (I suspect) for quite a few other readers as well.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
If there was a second shooter able to hide and shoot from within a crawl space under that roof, I would be concerned he might be back in there again to finish the job when Trump returns in October.

That depends on whether any such second shooter (likely the shooter of the first three rounds, as best as I can figure) worked _with_ Trump's security, and deliberately missed, or intended to kill Trump, only failing to do so by some great miracle or great luck, to Trump's benefit.

I remain convinced that shooter intended to miss, that Trump's inner security team and Trump himself knew of the assassination plot ahead of time, that they had a "serious conversation" with that shooter before the "big day", and that they knew that he intended to miss, but that his deep state management still thought he intended to kill.

This is just the sort of Big Time Sting operation that Trump has much experience running, and it's exactly the sort of Sting he had to run, to avoid dying like a couple of Kennedy's, whose sons he knew/knows well, died, as Trump lives out a long anticipated career to avenge exactly those deaths (and the 9/11 death of his home town, the Big Apple, and the removal from office, by an intelligence agency orchestrated impending impeachment, of their long time colleague Nixon.)

Serious snipers deal with life and death, up close and real. To a man I would expect that, given the choice, they would prefer to "accidentally or miraculously" miss Trump, rather than follow the treasonous B.S. orders of their DEI promoted managers (and as a typical consequence for Presidential level assassins, being dead within hours.)

Trump's security and intelligence was sufficient that that key sniper was given that choice. Trump knew before he walked down that escalator in 2015 that this day would come. This is exactly the sort of high stakes "poker" game that Trump plays to win.

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
And I realize it should be much harder then to go unnoticed - have any videos shown whether this building has a drop ceiling with space above?

The roof is seen as pitched from the exterior, but the ceiling is seen as flat from the inside. So the only question is how close that flat interior ceiling is to the underside of the slanted exterior roof. From what little I've seen of such construction, there is almost certainly enough space to work ventilation, lighting, and electrical service, hidden above the interior ceiling.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
It is scripted so as to drill the other part of the script into the crowd's heads, whether that crowd is made of extras from Central casting or "RentaCrowd"

I don't see where you need much scripting or fancy propaganda tools to get a bunch of people to all do exactly what they most naturally would want to do, are able to do, and will choose to do, given everything they each know at the time.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Maybe these are better. Do you see blood now?

Ok - a little bit of stage blood.

(I'd still wager a pretty penny that his ear is unscathed, and that Trump knows it is unscathed, at that exact moment in time.)

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
... is it "all scripted" ... Techniques Of Propaganda ...

So ... you're labeling (name-calling) something here with the glittering generalities of "scripted" and "propaganda".

I'm at a loss, however, to surmise what part(s) of this discussion you're so labeling (and apparently thus denigrating).

Oh well.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
However ... here's the key evidence, from the 13:24 mark to the 23:32 mark of Chris Martenson's The FBI and Regime Media Work Together To Busy The Investigation - Peak Prosperity video, posted five days ago now.

The first three shots are more muffled (reduced high frequencies), as if shot from inside a building, not from on the roof.

It's worth pointing out this key evidence more explicitly.

In the following screen shot, from the 16:01 mark of the Youtube video linked in the above quote of myself, you can see the audio spectrum of the first eight shots.



This audio recording was taken (if I recall correctly) from a mobile phone held by someone standing on the ground outside of and to the west of AGR Bldg #6. I have marked the two groups of shots as [Shots_A] and [Shots_B] in this screen shot.

The first three of these shots, which were shot at a slower pace, have reduced high frequencies (approximately 4000 Hz to 15000 Hz, as marked on the left hand scale).

The second five of these shots, which were shot at a faster pace, have more vivid high frequencies

[Shots_A] The first three shots evidently came from a more enclosed location, via a less direct path to the recording phone, thus their recorded sounds have lost some of their higher frequency intensity. In other words, the sound as recorded here of these first three shots is more muffled. My current hypothesis is that these shots came from a professional sniper, working above the first floor ceiling of Bldg #6, below its eaves, in front of the patsy on the roof. In the expectations of the deep state operatives who set him up there, this sniper wasn't supposed to miss. However, Trump made a better deal with him.

[Shots_B] The patsy sniper (Crooks, allegedly) was on the roof of that building. There would have been very little blocking the higher frequency sounds from his shots, as recorded by this phone just west of Bldg #6. So likely the second, more rapid, burst of five shots came from the patsy on the roof.

[Alecs]

Chris Martenson takes a look at video and audio to try to determine whose blood was in the bathroom.

Also, toward the very end (33:00) he makes note of a 'rifle swap' at the main entrance of the Building 6 and asks for anyone's ideas on it. I'm curious whether anyone can determine if the rifle swap guy (in camoflauge), perhaps being the 'operator', is wearing a glove on his right hand.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3-AKAEC8c6g

On rumble: https://rumble.com/v5au551-240813-aci-public.html

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Alecs (here)
Chris Martenson takes a look at video and audio to try to determine whose blood was in the bathroom.

Unfortunately, Chris Martenson makes no progress in determining this.

As I commented below this Youtube video yesterday:

All that chatter to tell is, at the 31:16 mark, that "for now it stands as a pretty interesting compelling mystery that we would want to resolve".

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Maybe these are better. Do you see blood now?

Ok - a little bit of stage blood.

It would be an amazing piece of stagecraft indeed (bordering on magic) to apply a streak of fake blood between this frame (no blood) ...




and this frame (bloodied from touching his ear) ...



...when the frames are separated by about one quarter of a second (I measured the timeline in a video editing program)

The blood on his fingers is visible only in this tiny split second window, because he closes his fist almost instantly. And at this point he hasn't been given his 'fake' injury yet.

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
(I'd still wager a pretty penny that his ear is unscathed, and that Trump knows it is unscathed, at that exact moment in time.)

I'm not a betting man my friend, but I'd take that wager [x10] every day of the week for one million years.

Genuine question (cordially asked), Are you sure you're not trying to bang a square peg into a round hole here -- trying to strong-arm the evidence to fit your theory? Because I'm sorry, nothing about it adds up.

That Trump was really hit by a real bullet isn't even a question in my mind. And to be frank, I'm slightly baffled it is in yours.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
It would be an amazing piece of stagecraft indeed (bordering on magic) to apply a streak of fake blood between this frame (no blood) ...
...
and this frame (bloodied from touching his ear) ...

What's so amazing about having a little, easily burst, packet of stage blood behind his right ear, hiding behind his magnificent hair for the ten (or whatever) minutes he was in public view, before the shooting began?

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
Genuine question (cordially asked), Are you sure you're not trying to bang a square peg into a round hole here -- trying to strong-arm the evidence to fit your theory? Because I'm sorry, nothing about it adds up.

That Trump was really hit by a real bullet isn't even a question in my mind. And to be frank, I'm slightly baffled it is in yours.

I don't believe in miracles, and I don't adopt one in bazillion "lucky shot" explanations unless I can find no option.

I do believe in people acting in character, especially in critical scenarios that they've obviously anticipated for much of their lives, when the outcome ends up being so nearly perfectly advantageous to them, against all apparent odds.

Once a few trivial conjectures and mistakes that you and others have pointed out (thanks!) have been corrected, I can find nothing in my hypothetical scenario that is surprising or unlikely. Everything and everyone behaved just as one might most likely expect them to behave.

Time and time again, Trump gets apparent adversaries to do exactly what Trump wants them to do, because Trump has successfully arranged the situation such that the other party chooses, quite predictably, to do just that.

When Trump gets the opportunity to set the stage, and he's had decades to set this stage and to know that it would be an absolutely critical event in his life and his endeavors, this is how he plays the game.

Similarly, everyone else who played a significant role in this event played right to their character and capacity, just as one would expect them to most likely do.

Given a choice between what is most likely, and what is most unlikely, I am at a loss to understand why anyone is still giving more than a passing consideration to the most unlikely.

===

Analogy:

Let's say (as might be the case - I've not gone back and researched this) that Bobby Fischer, as a young and upcoming chess genius, knew that eventually he would face whomever at the time was recognized as the best chess player of the time ... perhaps it was Boris Spassky, in the late 1960's.

Let's further say that Fischer had a reputation (I've no idea if he did) of closely studying the games of likely upcoming opponents, and that there were plenty of Spassky's games available for Fischer to study.

Now imagine that Fischer gets his first, highly anticipated, match with Spassky, and that Spassky plays his usual favorite opening and style of play, until late in the middle game when Fischer makes an unexpected sacrifice, an apparent error, that only in hindsight was understood to be a brilliant move that led to Fischer checkmating Spassky, a dozen moves later. "Not possible", all the chess commentators are saying. "Must be luck." "No one could have anticipated that checkmate, a dozen moves ahead of time." I would counter that "Fischer knew." He might not have known in the same way that you or I would know such things ... but he knew. That's how Fischer played.

Chess aside, back to Trump times.

This is how Trump plays. He's been doing it for decades, and he's known for decades that this particular event, or something closely resembling it, would happen ... the deep state would assign an assassin to shoot him, in the head, on live TV, after his security had been laid almost bare. Trump has clearly been working with excellent intelligence into his adversaries (he'd be long gone, six foot under, buried in a footnote of history, otherwise). He's been working with a number of others who know that taking down the Satanic deep state that has been feasting (literally) on humanity and on this planet's resources for hundreds if not thousands of years would be difficult in the extreme.

Do NOT DOUBT Trump's deliberate moves here just because "no one could have anticipated and planned so many details so well." That's exactly how Trump plays and Trump has had a near lifetime, since JFK was shot in Dallas when Trump was 17 years old, to anticipate and refine his plans, and to focus and energize his efforts, for exactly this event.

If Trump knew this particular assassination attempt was being laid out for his rally in Butler, PA, and if he knew who the intended "real" assassin was, the sniper who "couldn't miss" at that range, then all Trump had to do was "make a deal" with that sniper, a deal that greatly benefitted that sniper as well. "Just miss, and we'll take care of you." Then a trivial, I mean really trivial, bit of stagecraft involving Trump and one or two of his most trusted close body security agents, and it was fait accompli - good as gold - done deal.

I honestly cannot imagine Trump NOT choosing that path, if the choice was presented to him. Can you?

Given the brilliant success of Trump's counter-assassination operation that day in Butler, and given that Trump has survived and gained strength after eight years of relentless, focused, attacks from the Deep State, and given also the increasingly desperate and sloppy work of his adversaries, I also cannot imagine that Trump didn't know that that assassination was planned. Can you?

[Hermoor]

There appear to be a number of flaws with this photograph.



Also the interview Doug Mills gives here is a train wreck. It's excruciatingly fudged. I've listened to it several times. He's such a twee little lodge rodent, as is the melt who's fake interviewing him.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NVp3cTKWPcg5


Photography is a humble passion of mine. I like geeking out with these Butler photos because I've learned a chunk more about how the parasites do their thing.

All of the precise angles and moments I want to see photos or footage of don't appear to exist in the public domain. That is a colossal red herring in itself considering how many 'top' pros, regular pros and everyday folk were lensed up in all directions and distances from the stage.

All of the 'big four' photographers and at least half a dozen of their images are ringing my alarm bells all over the place for various reasons.

Jabin Botsford. Why is so much of his POV sunglasses cam footage missing? Where did it go? Why don't they want us to see it?

They don't want us to see it because it would give too much of the game away.

Anna Moneymaker's shot of Trump under the pile on with three big streaks of blood running down his right cheek? That image throws up questions and complications about what really happened before and after it was taken.

Evan Vucci's "Iwo Jima" shot is not natural. I'm still pondering over exactly how unnatural it really is.

Doug Mill's "bullet" photo? It's probably not a bullet. Military forums are saying it's a contrail from a bullet. It might be neither? The trajectory is parallel to the ground, or near as damn it. There is no discernible angle of elevation to it. Its flight path is nowhere near Trump's upper ear. Trump didn't miraculously escape it by turning his head at the last split second.

The image of Trump is slightly out of focus and/or slightly blurred. This is highly problematical and Mill's discussion of the subject was a clusterf*ck. You won't blur Trump with a shutter speed of 1/8000 second, he should be crystal clear. You won't get Trump even slightly out of focus either, the notion is absurd. It is a well known fact that Sony's autofocus systems are the very best and most advanced in the market. They've been leading the field for many years. We are supposed to think that a top photographer using the world's most advanced camera and a class leading fast prime lens took an image as blurred/out of focus as that? Utter baloney.

Plus the bokeh doesn't make a lot of sense either.

The whole image makes me angry. It's a bad joke.

There are at least half a dozen more 'big, famous' images I could chew out at length, but I've got better things to do with my time.

After a real trawl of a search I eventually found images of the event by another pro press photographer with an Oriental sounding name. There were plenty more about than just him, but their images have all found a truly remarkable hiding place.

So many of the photos have hugely different colour renderings. For sure different camera brands will render colours differently. For sure different angles all come with slightly different lighting conditions. Of course the natural, ambient light and weather are changing all the time. But the colour renderings of some of the images even have me questioning the weather and if the images were all taken on the same day.

There are loads of anomalies with the video footage side of things too.

I'm sure one or two of Moneymaker's images I initially viewed on Getty Images are not there any more.

Botsford and Moneymaker both apparently getting a timely stage cue from a secret service agent stinks like a trawlerman's wellies.

There were more freemasons per square foot on and around that stage than an octopus could shake eight sticks at. I'm actually quite shocked too by how many of these eejits and lost souls are faces in the alt media. Practically the biggest problem with the alt media is trying to find a researcher or commentator who isn't lodged up. They are crap at trying to hide themselves nowadays or maybe they just don't care any more.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Hermoor (here)
Doug Mill's "bullet" photo? It's probably not a bullet. Military forums are saying it's a contrail from a bullet. It might be neither? The trajectory is parallel to the ground, or near as damn it. There is no discernible angle of elevation to it. Its flight path is nowhere near Trump's upper ear. Trump didn't miraculously escape it by turning his head at the last split second.

I would expect the trajectory to be about flat. A high velocity sniper round at 140 or so yards, when shooter and target are at about the same elevation, will be more or less flat. You'd need more precise details of the exact elevations of both shooter and Trump than we reliably have to know exactly. If there were multiple shooters, we don't even have the shooter's elevation, whether above, below, or equal to the elevation of Trump's head, to be useful in our analysis here.

Given Mill's shutter speed of 1/8000 of a second and an estimated bullet speed of 3000 ft/sec, the bullet would travel about 4.5 inches (3000/8000 of one foot) during one shutter opening. The "bullet path" looks perhaps twice as long as 4.5 inches to me, so the "contrail" explanation makes more sense to me.

Since at least two of the three shots missed Trump, and by my hypothesis, all three missed by a safe margin, the lack of alignment of this bullet's (or its contrail) path with the upper lobe of Trump's right ear is yet more evidence consistent with my hypothesis, that the first shooter really was shooting to miss, than it is an anomaly that's difficult to explain by the "mainstream" narrative.

Posted by Hermoor (here)
The image of Trump is slightly out of focus and/or slightly blurred. This is highly problematical and Mill's discussion of the subject was a clusterf*ck. You won't blur Trump with a shutter speed of 1/8000 second, he should be crystal clear.

I thought f-stops determined depth of field, not shutter speed. Granted, getting fast shutter speeds and tight f-stops at the same time is (I'm guessing here ... at the ragged edge of my knowledge) more difficult. I would think that you would need a fast sensor, quality lenses and lots of light - but Mills had all those. Is that camera's auto-focus so good that it might have deliberately focused in on the bullet's contrail, center of shot? That would be sweet, if so.