*** Trump Shot (but safe) *** Live Now on all News Channels

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Daniel59 (here)
Side note: Even billionaires have hair in their ears

I have no doubt but that billionaires who have an interest in how their hair looks can afford to have someone clip the hairs in their ears, as part of their routine tasks.

[ExomatrixTV]

• The United Nations Plot to Stop Trump

[Hermoor]

I said from the outset this incident had all the hallmarks of an esoteric ritual by a secret society.

The bloodied right ear. The shoes. The toes bursting out of the socks. The blood at the mouth. The compasses. The all seeing eye looking over America. The miraculous miss(es). The apparent resurrection/rebirth of the fallen hero to many. The genuine sacrifice of genuine innocents or perhaps genuine crisis actors. The enough is enough motif and coincidences. All of the other many coincidences. The miraculous healing. It happening on the 13th. The shots starting at 6:11:33. Footage and photos from every angle, distance and moment, apart from a total lack of anything that would let the cat right out of the bag from behind the stage or its sides. How convenient. About as convenient as framing the world's worst patsy. If they really wanted him dead, then he'd be dead. Putting secret society photographers on the media interview circuit circus in the aftermath was a novel touch. And on and on the list could go. But enough of it for now.

Is Harris thesis? Is Trump antithesis? Or vice-versa?

No matter what. The synthesis coming down the pipe is going to be a gargantuan mess. Just like it was ordered and scripted to be long ago.

Good luck to all decent Americans, from my heart. You're going to need all the luck you can get, as will the rest of us. Nobody is coming to save any of us. We need to save ourselves.

I wonder how on point this rabbi is? By my reckoning he's at least in the general ball park.


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/V997TIRyPgnD/

[Gwin Ru]

...

... let's see now... more bullets than shots heard?:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m9_BwEB71Xk

[Daniel59]

If I find a photo from after the assassination in which Trump's ear is not covered by hair, I will improve the montage.


Photo 1: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail...oto/2023794789

Photo 4: https://www.alamy.com/republican-pre...d&searchtype=0

Photo 5 2024 August 8: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail...oto/2165919734

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
... let's see now... more bullets than shots heard?:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m9_BwEB71Xk

I have to say, that was an interesting discussion. (Great shame that the rest is behind a paywall, though, rather than free, but safe from censorship, on Rumble. )

I know Chris Martenson has problems with John Cullen, but I'd love to see Martenson address what's being shown here.

[Philippe]

Hereby links to the analysis by Alexis Cossette-Trudel from Radio Quebec (sorry I do not know if an english translation exists)
He is adamant that there was NO breach in security. There are several layers of military security. Why do you insist on unraveling this mystery? Let the deep state deal with it

Kimberley Cheatel, directrice des services secrets, confirme la continuité de gouvernement (« devolution ») : (Cf.1h02) https://vk.com/radioquebec?z=video54...wall_544172849

N.B. : « Ce n’est pas de sa responsabilité »… mais celle du JSOC
It was not her responsibility ... but the JSOC's

Alexis « JSOC » : https://vk.com/radioquebec?z=video54...l_544172849_-2

[ExomatrixTV]

• Dave Smith - Trump Isn't the Same Since the Bullet:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dfe1LQbxXfY

Polls don’t measure voter sentiment, pollings are just means to shape it.

[ExomatrixTV]

• 'Do you find it odd that body of Trump shooter…': Cory Mills raises questions on Federal inquiry:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Wpu4tzR0jUI

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1831318582443094092

Western Lensman
@WesternLensman
HAWLEY: Most agents guarding Trump during assassination attempt were Homeland Security personnel who took "two-hour online webinar."

🚨🚨🚨

THIS IS INSANE:

Whistleblowers have revealed to Sen. Hawley that most agents guarding Trump were not Secret Service, but DHS agents who were trained for two hours on zoom:

HAWLEY to
@JesseBWatters
: “What I've heard tonight, Jesse, is that most of the agents who were there at that rally in Butler were not Secret Service agents. They were, in fact, Homeland Security agents. And get this, most of those homeland security agents, the only training that they received was an online webinar, a two hour online webinar. And I'm told that about half the time the sound to the webinar didn't even work."

"So think about this. The president, the United States, former president, United States, Donald Trump is sent out on stage. Most of the people there aren't trained. They're not qualified. They only got a webinar training and even that didn't work. It is absolutely outrageous."

////////////


Jeff Carlson
@themarketswork
·
57m
The best explanation for all of this is a highly coordinated operation hidden under a pretense of planned incompetence.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Navy SEAL Vet CALLS OUT Feds for Pathetic Response to Trump Shooting:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=JbRZlktAb-Y

Erik Prince — Navy SEAL Veteran, founder of Blackwater, and host of “Off Leash” — says politicians are too cowardly to hold the government responsible for the Trump assassination attempt. He says the parallel investigation is necessary to get the bottom of the security failures that almost cost Trump his life. But Prince also asks what many are thinking: did the shooting happen due to incompetence or intentionally?

[Hermoor]

Ole Dammegard. "Diving Deeper Into The Trump Deception."

https://lightonconspiracies.com/divi...ump-deception/

Another Ole Dammegard research piece which is otherwise behind the paywall on his own website. "Trump. Shot Or Not?"


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uJSsBuS8JDXG

[Gwin Ru]

...

... it seems that John Cullen is getting close to demonstrating that there is an impossibility for the same first shot to have hit Trump's ear and the railing of the stage-left bleacher by focusing on what didn't happen at the upper left corner of that bleacher (starts at ~ 17:12 in the video):

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0NmX_qjFPtU

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)

Posted by Vangelo (here)
Was There A Second Shooter? Owen Shroyer And John Cullen Debate
source:

This is a well argued video presenting multiple shooters.
[...]

It seems like John Cullen is having as much of a hard time as I have, to get it across that Trump couldn't have been hit by that first shot...

Yet, Trump, at the moment that first shot was heard, started lifting his right hand towards his ear... not possible with the constraints imposed on the trajectory of that first shot by the evidence occurring at that same moment along the upper edge of the stage-left bleacher! Yet Trump already had his hand to his ear by the time of the second shot and was ducking at the time of the third shot.

That's why I am calling Trump's bloodied ear a simulation.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
That's why I am calling Trump's bloodied ear a simulation.

Yup - though perhaps it was not the bloody injury itself that was simulated. Rather it was perhaps the cause of the injury that was simulated.

As I posted above on July 14, one day after the shooting:

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
It wasn't ... fake blood ... Not a chance.

Here's a possibility that came to my mind a few hours ago, after a good friend of mine who had considerable experience with fake blood preparation for actors told me that that blood on Trump's ear was quite real, almost certainly not faked.

Perhaps Trump's blood and ear wound is quite real ... not faked at all.

But perhaps a complicit Secret Service agent, amongst those who piled on Trump after shots were fired, manually made that wound, with Trump's full consent and expectation (and perhaps a bit of Novocain applied to that ear lobe, before Trump came on stage, if Trump wanted to avoid a bit of discomfort).

... bet you hadn't thought of that possibility before (and quite possibly wish you had never thought of it )

It seems that 99% of all the analyses I've seen of possible shots, who shot what when from where to where, using what kind of ammunition and rifle ... almost all assume that the first audible round hit Trump's ear.

We know that something injured or at least surely appeared to injure Trump's ear before or just as he stood back up. But we have zero evidence as to when that injury occurred, between the time Trump turned to look to the "Immigration" chart to his right, and the time he stood back up from that Secret Service agent dog pile.

It would have been trivial for Trump, or his closest Secret Service agent in that dog pile of agents, to cut his ear. Given the "turn of events" and of Trump's head to his right, Trump's going off teleprompter deliberately, the shooing of press photographers from behind Trump's stage just before the shooting, and the total absence of any images confirming or denying that Trump's ear was injured before he dropped to the floor, ... all these are consistent with such an enactment, and each either slightly out of pattern or at least fortuitously well timed otherwise.

It would have been well within Trump's nature to "make a deal" ("You miss, you live well; you kill me, you die.") with the real first shooter to deliberately miss (especially if that real first shooter was a hired professional, not a mind controlled patsy), if only they had adequate foreknowledge of the planned assassination, and planned their counter-operation properly.

Given the high stakes intelligence and counter intelligence operations that have been in play for decades at that level, and given the outcome (quite favorable to Trump and the MAGA effort, and quite damaging to the Deep State agencies (*)) I find it highly likely that Trump's team had adequate foreknowledge of the planned assassination attempt in Butler.

Given the history of assassination attempts against "up-start" Presidents that Trump was very familiar with, I find it highly likely that they planned their counter-operation quite well. It was game on, for all the marbles, and they knew it.

Given Trump's long standing proclivity for such drama, for running sting operations, for high stakes "poker" games, and for "making deals" ... I continue to find some variation of this sort of scenario to be the most likely scenario.

(*) Cui bono?

[jaybee]

.

I feel the need to say this.....

There is no way in a million years that Trump was party to faking the attempted assassination - NO WAY -

I am, myself, 100% positive that he was (from whoever planned the whole thing's point of view) supposed to die on July 13th but it went wrong - and he lived -

Just a couple of practical reasons Trump would never have agreed to be part of faking his own assassination....

1. he knows how much the Deep State want him gone - GONE - and he could never be sure that he wouldn't REALLY be killed - while actors pretended to be part of a fake plot -

2. The Intelligence services in cahoots with the Deep State and Globalists have shown over and over that they are totally against Trump and if he was involved with a fake assassination plot they would soon use this + make it public to upset his supporters and discredit him and I mean really discredit him to the point of no return -

Generally I don't believe for a minute that Trump would act so dishonestly and disrespectfully towards his family, friends and supporters in America and throughout the wider world... he didn't need to do anything so crazy when he already has massive support... he wouldn't be so stupid to risk losing all credibility after working so hard for years to build up his base to make America great again... I just don't believe it's in his nature to do such a thing - it would be against all he is and all he stands for - including his belief in God.....

just wanted to get that off my chest ....

cheers to all whatever your theory about July 13th...

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by jaybee (here)
.I am, myself, 100% positive that he was (from whoever planned the whole thing's point of view) supposed to die on July 13th but it went wrong - and he lived -

I agree 100% that Trump was supposed to die on July 13 -- his brains blown out in full live video view of the world.

Posted by jaybee (here)
1. [Trump] knows how much the Deep State want him gone - GONE - and he could never be sure that he wouldn't REALLY be killed - while actors pretended to be part of a fake plot -

Yes - the Deep State knows their lives depend on Trump being gone. The Deep State is Deeply Desperate, and all their many less lethal cards have been played and failed. "Trump Must Die" (in their view).

However Trump has the temperament and experience to play high stakes poker, and to stack the odds in his favor, and win. He's been doing that for decades ... it's part of who he is. In this case, given the years that Trump and his military/intelligence allies have had to game this, turning this assassination into a sting operation was apparently quick, easy, and relatively certain to succeed.

Posted by jaybee (here)
2. The Intelligence services in cahoots with the Deep State and Globalists have shown over and over that they are totally against Trump and if he was involved with a fake assassination plot they would soon use this + make it public to upset his supporters and discredit him and I mean really discredit him to the point of no return -

The Deep state can NOT use this against him. No way!

For doing so would expose their major role in orchestrating and carrying out this assassination attempt. The Deep State really, really, did try to kill him, as they successfully did JFK, RFK and MLK, and nearly successfully did to Reagan. There is no way in hell the Deep State is going to abandon their "lone extremist nut shooter" narratives, and replace them with a "we really, really, with great effort, tried once again to kill a President or potential President, but he tricked us and the plot failed." No way in hell.

Posted by jaybee (here)
Generally I don't believe for a minute that Trump would act so dishonestly and disrespectfully towards his family, friends and supporters in America and throughout the wider world... he didn't need to do anything so crazy when he already has massive support...

Trump did not do this just to win some election.

Trump did this as an absolute essential act in taking down the Deep State that has spent centuries infiltrating and destroying this Republic. He knew beyond any reasonable doubt that they would try to kill him. He knew he would either (1) die, or (2) thwart the plot and begin to expose the corruption of the CIA/FBI/Secret Service/... agencies who engaged in the plot.

If Trump died, not only did he die, but so did our nation. Trump absolutely owed it to his family, friends, supporters and God to turn this inevitable assassination attempt into a sting operation. Trump has a long history of pulling off such sting operations ... "America's Mayor" Rudy Giuliani owes his political success to Trump's sting operations exposing some of the New York City mafia.

Trump has known for many years that his life was on the line, that if he was scared to die, he would be insufficiently bold to win. Trump made his choice when he descended that escalator on June 16, 2015, over nine years ago. He's been living it ever since. Such warriors aren't common in our world, but they exist, and have always existed. If I presumed that everyone would act like the wimp that I usually am, I would sometimes totally misunderstand the deliberate, bold, dangerous, and potentially deadly acts of those acting in their warrior spirit, for a larger cause.

The key to understanding such events is not only to understand "Cui Bono?" (who benefits?), but to also understand the sometimes quite unusual nature of the key characters involved, and the dominant issues at play.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Trump has a long history of pulling off such sting operations

This won't persuade anyone else not already thinking along these lines, but in my view, the scamdemic vaxxx genocide, the wars in the Ukraine and Israel, the stolen 2020 election, a likely upcoming nail-biting threat of nuclear war, the further collapse of several major U.S. cities, exposure somehow of the massive trafficking in children for sexual torture and adrenochrome, and a major financial/monetary collapse are also major sting operations, some already occurred, some still unfolding.

The size of the sting ops must be commensurate with the size of the evils being taken down. Only this way do a majority of ordinary people learn, deep in their bones, for generations to come, what must not be allowed.

[T Smith]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
.

The key to understanding such events is not only to understand "Cui Bono?" (who benefits?), but to also understand the sometimes quite unusual nature of the key characters involved, and the dominant issues at play.

It's an interesting hypothesis, but I'm not entirely sold on the "Cui Bono" component. For sure J13 directly benefited Trump for the first two weeks or so after the assassination, but now it would seem the entire story has been sucked deep down into a collective memory hole.

I do find it amazing, to paraphrase John Cullen in the first two minutes of this video, that J13 and all its massive implications has all but disappeared from the news cycle, as if it didn't happen. And all everybody is now talking about instead is Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala...

If this were some kind of Cui Bono counter psyop, wouldn't the Trump camp be exploiting the assassination attempt more to their benefit? Why isn't the Trump camp keeping what happened on J13 more front and center in the news cycle? Trump is infamous for driving the news cycle and certainly has no problem with humility; yet on this issue, he seems somewhat timid exploiting the public outcry and sympathy. It is as if he has a card to play (controversial though it may be), but doesn't really want to play it. Not something one might expect if it were a staged counter psyop.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by T Smith (here)
wouldn't the Trump camp be exploiting the assassination attempt more to their benefit?

The main stream media doesn't want to talk about it - that's for sure.

But the Secret Service and FBI are in desperate CYA mode, while those such as Dan Bongino are exposing their Deep (State) corruption for the world to see.

My son, who is a (sometimes somewhat reluctant) Trump voter and a Christian, observed, right after Trump survived the assassination attempt on July 13, that if Trump responded with his usual braggadocio to surviving the assassination attempt by such a close call, then that would turn him off to Trump. Rather my son was looking for Trump to display a bit of humility, after having been blessed with a hand of God miracle.

I think Trump knows this, instinctively. Sure, brag about the big sounding stuff that's a bit removed from the daily lives of most of us, most of the time ... but be more humble before the power of the higher being, when he touches so close.

The story is not that the bullet missed being a kill shot by a fraction of an inch. The story is the Deep State's deep involvement in committing and covering up yet another Presidential level assassination attempt.

Posted by T Smith (here)
And all everybody is now talking about instead is Kamala, Kamala, Kamala, Kamala...

Not everybody. Tucker Carlson and Dan Bongino now have some of the largest audiences, and Kamala only gets passing bits of ridicule and disgust from them.

[meat suit]

There are only 2 options in my view:

A. This was a clumsy failed assassination attemt by the bad guys.
Or
B. More likely a planned assassination attempt intercepted by a sting operation to 'catch them all'.

It will be 100 years or more before we find out, maybe never.

The 2 choices for team Trump if they got wind of the planned assassination attempt would have been:
A. Cancel the event
B. Play theatre and catch them all.

We will never know basically but hopefully a lot of bad actors will be rounded up in due course.