WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
The global elite are not threatened by hyperventilating conspiracists, such as QAnon enthusiasts.

Thank goodness. I doubt I could have handled the pressure as well as Dennis, Brian, or Greer. (For those who don't catch the drift of my odd sense of humor, I was once, and might still be, what I wryly label as a "Q-tard".)

Humor aside, I have zero doubt but that Wade is right and knows first hand the hard way that such next generation energy technology has presented and still presents a far more serious threat to the globalists than any of the Q stuff. A fundamental way by which the globalists control us is by control of the resources, such as wood, coal, oil and uranium, that are critical to our energy infrastructure. Wars, money (e.g. the petro-dollar), nations, corporations, food, industry, and law all orbit the supply of bulk fuels. Our civilization runs on "burning stuff", including targeted throttling of access to such fuels, aka the Green New Scam.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Paul:

You had to see Dennis in action to believe it. Both times when he was released from incarceration – and not any old incarceration, as the jailers were trying to kill him – I saw him immediately after his release, and he treated his years behind bars as some kind of vacation, where he could rest, write, and go back at it again harder than ever when he got out. And he turned down a billion dollars and got prison instead.

As Mr. Professor’s widow said, Dennis did not seem human. Unlike Ed and Brian, Dennis is still alive, and I am doing what I can so that our efforts might inch the ball down the field. Our adventures should be required reading for anybody who is trying to make a dent in these areas.

Conspiracies are very real and have an impact, but the picture is far larger than that. The conspiracists who think that the “White Hats” are going to come down the chimney like Santa Claus are in for a long wait. Just in the last week, I have been sent three “White Hat” predictions for next week, of Trump on the white steed, etc. I have seen at least 100 of those predictions since the 1990s, and they are always about something that will happen in days or weeks. Pure rubbish, but people keep cranking out that stuff. It helps turn people into spectators instead of participants. QAnon was only the latest iteration of that stuff.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

In 1968, my first professional mentor invented, in a flash at a stoplight, what a federal study concluded was the best engine for powering an automobile, by far. A rocket scientist who helped save the USA’s space program became that engine’s greatest champion, and a U.S. Senator called my mentor at home repeatedly to mount Congressional hearings to develop the engine. I got my first energy dreams then, during the USA’s first oil crisis. Many years later, my mentor told me that at a meeting of high-ranking federal officials, one told my mentor that if he thought that his engine was going to make the internal-combustion engine obsolete, that he should make his funeral plans.

An industrialist’s company stole my mentor’s engine, and I believe that I may have heard of its fate a decade later, and if so, my mentor’s engine was stolen and suppressed. Scientists calculated that a mail-delivery truck that used my mentor’s engine would get about 200 miles per gallon (MPG).

Before I met Dennis Lee, my mentor was building a vapor-injection carburetor with a colleague, before he sent for a list of patents for vapor-injection carburetors. The patents were largely owned by Detroit automobile makers, and my mentor wisely ceased his effort after that sobering revelation. Vapor-injection carburetors get 100-MPG or so.

After my first catastrophic stint with Dennis and after five years as a trucking-company controller, our insurance executive regaled me with a story from his Justice Department days, when he investigated the death threat made by a Detroit automobile company to an inventor with a vapor-injection carburetor. Instead of prosecuting the Detroit company, the Justice Department got the inventor a better settlement, so that his technology could be shelved. The capper of his story was that the oil companies funded the settlement.

In my early days with Dennis, after the Seattle company was stolen in 1986, the inventor in Dennis’s stable told me about his days working for General Motors (GM) in the 1940s, as he unwittingly helped GM steal patents. While at GM, he heard of a Chevy pickup truck prototype that was accidentally sold, and the amazed customer was getting 70 MPG with it. GM made a generous offer to gets its truck back.

In light of those anecdotes, when Dennis invited me to the White House in 2006 for a demonstration of the 100-MPG vapor-injection technology that he was selling (and working with a Detroit automaker to install his carburetor at the factory), I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.

When I visited Dennis in 2013, he told me about how David Rockefeller called him at home about a national ad that Dennis ran for his carburetor, before the ad ran. That was far from our first encounter with the Rockefellers. The Rockefellers’ bank wiped out Dennis’s manufacturer just as Washington’s electric companies called in all their favors to wipe out Dennis’s company. Coincidence? I would not bet on it. The Mormon Financial Empire was also involved. My sense is that the Rockefellers do not play at the highest levels. When we dealt with representatives of the global elite, they never identified themselves. The Rothschilds also got involved, meeting with one of Dennis’s associates in one of the CIA’s eavesdrop-proof rooms at Langley. That told me that the Rothschilds are not at the top, either, if they ever were. Is anybody very surprised that oil companies would conspire with automobile companies, whose cars were the biggest users of oil?

Those situations, with the sitting American president, all three of the big Detroit automakers, the Justice Department, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, etc., can provide the grist for numerous conspiracy theories. How much overlap was there between the Mormon Financial Empire and the Rockefellers and Rothschilds? I don’t know, but the Mormon interests seemed to have been the kingpins.

The suppression of exotic technologies such as free-energy technology is just one of many facets of what gets suppressed, especially regarding energy technologies.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

Bill Fairchild commented on how he saw so many ads in Popular Mechanics (PM) for high-MPG technology long ago, and nothing ever made it to market. I replied that Victor Fischer’s engine was in PM in the 1980s, and my mentor made a similar observation in the 1980s about PM and how nothing ever made it to market. As I wrote in my previous post, organized suppression is very real and one reason why nothing made it to market, but that is far from the only reason. Brian O’Leary spent his last years trying to educate the public on the vast gulf between a working prototype and something ready for the market. It is delusional to think that a working prototype means a couple of short-and-easy steps to the marketplace, when the fun has only begun.

My exchange with Bill inspired part of this post, to discuss some of those structural obstacles, before organized suppression even rolls out of bed. Victor is a good example. He was (he may be alive, but I doubt it, as he would be in his 90s by now and he was not a paragon of health) an American but developed his hydraulic heat engine in Australia, similar to how Yull Brown developed his Brown’s Gas technology in Australia. Fischer first patented his engine internationally, to avoid the USA’s patent-seizure laws. The company that developed his engine raised something like $10 million to develop his engine, but only about $2 million was spent on actual prototype development, while the rest went to “overhead,” which was basically pocket-lining of the people who raised the money. That is not unusual. For many capitalist plays, the technology is incidental, as the goal is making money, so soaking investors is a common tactic.

When Fischer’s prototype proved viable, then there were ugly power plays to steal it, etc. – the kind of thing that I saw many times during my days with Dennis. It reminds me of that old saw, that a criminal is a person with predatory instincts who could not raise enough capital to form a corporation. The criminal factor is very high in those entrepreneurial waters, which is why Dennis kept running afoul of actual mobsters who repeatedly tried to kill him. The global elite have been called very organized crime, and are just more sophisticated versions of street-corner mobsters.

For those hundreds, maybe thousands, of technologies advertised and covered in PM that never made it to market, my guess is that relatively few got much organized suppression, if any. Most succumbed to the vagaries of capitalism. Maybe the technologies were not as good as advertised, but many went nowhere through the inability to raise enough money, ended in self-inflicted bloodbaths of greed, or they just were not competent enough to ride that development curve to completion, and there is plenty of luck involved. I wrote a series of posts last month on this.

As Tom Bearden said, most of the time, when an effort was defeated by organized suppression, those who were suppressed did not even realize it. They had no idea that they had been subjected to organized suppression. When those Mormons stole our Seattle and Ventura companies, our business associates eagerly signed on with them, including people close to me, and I could not believe it at first. One talented agent of organized suppression was able to get nearly everybody to slit their own throats by playing to their greed and fear. Those were all part of the primary lesson of my journey and why I do not want to have anything to do with the businessman’s path to the Fifth Epoch. Victor and Yull both betrayed Dennis in the end, leaving him high and dry. That all contributed to Dennis’s statement that his allies hurt him more than his enemies did.

In the end, invoking organized suppression as the primary reason why those technologies in PM never made it to market is probably inaccurate. The reality is far more complex, and the structural issues are far more important than the conspiratorial ones.

In my coming posts on various conspiratorial topics, the explanations will mainly be pretty mundane, not some grand conspiracy.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

One of the most divisive subjects that I have encountered is also fundamentally an energy issue: Global Warming and the proposed “solutions.” The basics are simple, and people need minimal scientific literacy to understand them. It could almost begin and end with this simple fact: carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere captures infrared radiation. If somebody understands that, the rest is trivial.

When sunlight hits Earth, photons are captured by electrons. For photosynthesizers, that photon energy is captured until life uses that energy, and that captured energy powers virtually all of Earth’s ecosystems. We all eat sunlight. The only exception is chemosynthesis-based ecosystems that are underground and in volcanic vents in bodies of water, the ocean in particular. But even then, sunlight ultimately powers chemosynthetic organisms, as the Sun’s energy creates an energetic disequilibrium that makes chemosynthesis feasible.

For sunlight photons captured by atoms not involved in photosynthesis, they make their way back to space. But that radiation is in the less energetic infrared spectrum. Molecules of three atoms or more in the atmosphere temporarily capture those space-bound photons. They soon emit them again, but in a random direction, and enough of those photons are aimed back at Earth to create “radiative forcing,” which is the primary dynamic of today’s Global Warming.

Over the eons of life on Earth, scientists have reconstructed Earth’s climatic trends, and carbon-dioxide levels are considered to have been the primary drivers of Earth’s variable climate, with its hot and cold periods. The carbon cycle of Earth’s surface has had simple drivers. Until the rise of human civilizations and especially industrial ones, volcanism introduced carbon to the cycle, and the burial of sediments by plate tectonics removed the carbon. Since humans began burning hydrocarbon fuels in earnest, beginning with England’s industrialization, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels began dramatically rising. Today, the carbon dioxide vented to the atmosphere by human activities is 100 times what volcanoes produce. There is really nothing to argue about. Human activities are increasing carbon-dioxide levels, which is making Earth’s surface warmer than it would otherwise be. That should have been the end of the issue, but vested interests have muddied the waters.

Fred Singer mentored Brian O’Leary during Brian’s early days as a climate scientist. Singer sold his soul to vested interests, and the two most notorious were tobacco companies and hydrocarbon companies. Singer’s deceptions were criminal at times, and with a compliant media, Singer and a handful like him helped create a “debate” over Global Warming that really did not exist among scientists. Singer even introduced the conspiratorial idea that Global Warming is a hoax, which was highly dismaying to Brian. Singer’s work only duped the gullible, and millions of people have willingly been duped on that issue. I have had to listen to the scientifically illiterate arguments of people who deny Global Warming. Their delusions align with their self-interest, and they are almost all right wingers.

Many of them have a related delusion, which is that we will never run out of oil. That has long been a dubious fringe hypothesis, but even if true, all of Earth’s easy oil has been mined. Mining Earth’s hydrocarbons will never get any easier and they will all be largely depleted in this century.

Will we run out of hydrocarbons before we turn Earth into a sauna? I call that a race of the catastrophes. Then, what those same right wingers do is decry the “solutions” purveyed by people such as Bill Gates, of Net Zero and the like. I agree that the Net-Zero initiatives are fraudulent, but the Global Warming issue is real, denied by no credible scientist that I know of.

On the conspiratorial front, one “solution” has been climate engineering. I have been hearing about “chemtrails” and weather engineering for 30 years, and the mainstream always dismissed it as crazed conspiratorial delusions, but now mainstream scientists are openly advocating chemtrails and weather engineering, and experiments that are just like chemtrails are openly acknowledged now. Just last week, I read of scientists who advocated injecting diamonds into the atmosphere. How far off-base were chemtrail conspiracy theorists, or were they right all along?

And free energy, the solution to all of it and more, is still completely ignored on the world stage. That is the most mind-boggling part for me.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

While right wingers who deny Global Warming are scientifically illiterate in my experience, the problems with left wingers and science are a little different. While right wingers tend to reject science altogether (like postmodernists do), left wingers tend to worship science, even at its most corrupt. Both are lopsided positions. Science is mainly a process of discovery, of testing hypotheses against the evidence. But in the real world, science can be corrupted by conflicts of interest. Today’s materialism that dominates mainstream science is a religion, while global elites have hidden the most important findings and have hidden world-changing technologies from scientists and the public.

Conflicts of interest are always the first place to look for corruption, in any endeavor. In a world of scarcity and fear, corruption is rife everywhere. This was my journey’s primary lesson. Ed Herman’s Propaganda Model of media performance is a conflict-of-interest model, which Noam Chomsky said was only a special case of the constraints that all intellectuals in capitalist societies are subjected to.

I was introduced to the medical racket before the energy racket. I was 12 when our family changed its diet from processed to whole food, which led to a health miracle for my father, as he “impossibly” reversed his artery disease. The book that initiated our change was banned in the USA in the next decade, but I did not learn that until I got both barrels of the energy racket and saw the medical racket in action. The right wing plays into the hands of the energy racket, and the left wing plays into the hands of the medical racket.

I have long looked into the roots of Western medicine and how it came to be a racket, and it is partly a conflict of paradigms. The feminine approach is prevention and gentle remedies, while the masculine approach is to wage warfare, and the human body is merely the theater of glorious battle, in which doctors kill both the diseases and the patients (who are collateral damage). I know which paradigm I prefer.

Before there was a germ theory of disease, there were vying camps on numerous issues, such as where life came from. Pasteur’s germ theory of disease seems to be a poorly understood plagiarism of a rival, but it became a medical dogma to this day. The evidence is strong that both polio and AIDS are caused by chemical poisoning, not viruses. The Moth and the Iron Lung is an excellent history of polio. There is no credible evidence that infectious disease was conquered by medical interventions, especially vaccines and antibiotics. Infectious disease was conquered by improvements in sanitation, nutrition, and hygiene, which were side effects of the Industrial Revolution and led to the biggest event in the human journey so far: the elimination of childhood death, as childhood deaths went from about half to nearly zero. For instance, measles deaths declined in England by 99.96% by the time that the measles vaccine was introduced.

Polio was the first infectious-disease scare after childhood death had been conquered in the USA, but polio was caused by pesticides, and by the 1970s, even according to the CDC, nearly 90% of polio cases were caused by the vaccine.

But as the obsolete infectious-disease bureaucracy kept seeking relevance, it began a series of disease scares, beginning with swine flu in 1976. AIDS was a bonanza for the infectious-disease establishment and how Anthony Fauci came to prominence. But AIDS was caused by chemical poisoning, mainly recreational drugs, and when the world’s leading virologist dissented from the HIV/AIDS dogma, Fauci destroyed his career. That is how rackets work.

Just as Fauci’s drugs killed hundreds of thousands of healthy gay men and the Reagan administration was addicting Asian women and children to tobacco, vaccine makers got legal immunity from vaccine injuries and the era of mandatory vaccines began. The Mafia never had a sweeter deal. Chronic diseases in American children have skyrocketed ever since. Every few years, Fauci and friends would hype another phony disease scare, until he finally hit pay dirt with COVID-19, which he may well have had a hand in creating.

The conflicts of interest are so extreme in medical science that it is considered, even by the defenders of science, to be the flimsiest and most corrupt branch of science. But today’s left wingers cannot even be engaged on the subject, and it was never more apparent than during the COVID-19 pandemic, which culminated in Chomsky’s statement that the unvaccinated should be imprisoned. All early treatments for COVID were wiped out, to make way for harmful, worthless, but lucrative patented treatments, as the medical racket raked it in like never before, as civil rights were trampled in history’s greatest transfer of wealth ever, from the working classes to elites (and it was all a coincidence?).

About 100 million Americans were noticeably injured by COVID vaccines, hundreds of thousands died, it has all been covered up, and the media, as usual, has been complicit, as its censorship (1) and propaganda reached new levels. And the left is oblivious to all of that or even defends it. Recent commentators have noted that critiquing the medical establishment used to be the province of the left, but now, any criticism of the medical establishment is branded as a right-wing conspiracy theory. Feminists, who have been the core of the left for generations, are being portrayed as right wingers as they challenge the trans dogma that has infected the so-called left. Sanity was left behind long ago on these issues.

The medical racket is mostly a structural phenomenon, although there are people at the top who know what they are doing. This is the 1% conspiracy and 99% complicity dynamic that all of the rackets have in common.

Best,

Wade

[Hermoor]

Hi Wade. Your posts are an enjoyable read, they are a positive influence on my education. As a teenager and young man I was a competitive javelin thrower. Lorna Jackson was the star of our training group. She's still the Scottish record holder with a throw from July 2000.

I remember Al Gore warning us in the early 1990s that unchecked global warming would result in rapid and catastrophic sea level rises. As scientifically literate as I am, I still prefer the simple observations and evidence of my own senses. Scotland hasn't lost or gained even an inch of its beaches to rising or falling sea levels since I started sailing in the 1970s. My home port's anchorage hasn't got an inch deeper or shallower in the past decade, nor have the high tide marks on the port's pilings.

In a similar vein I worked in the Maldives for several months in the mid 1990s. I still keep in touch with old friends who work there now. The Maldive islands haven't lost or gained even an inch of their beaches to rising or falling sea levels since I was last there, so they assure me.

I'd appreciate your feedback on my sea level observations please. A global warming/climate change crisis is supposed to raise sea levels to the extent that even Mr. Magoo would notice over the time periods I've mentioned, right?

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Hermoor, fellow spear thrower ( ):

As you have likely read, my family name comes from Scotland. My direct ancestor migrated to North America in the decade before Culloden. It has been kind of eerie to watch a show about my family, seeing people that my grandfather mentioned, such as the last man beheaded in Britain. The French spelling of my surname is because my ancestors moved back and forth between France and Scotland, depending on who ruled in England. My ancestors got tired of being kicked around by the English and became pacifist Quakers. But they participated in the Great American Land Grab from the Indians.

I know that Scotland is a complex case of what you perceive as sea level, as the oceans are rising but so is the land. In the past 50 years, that means less than three inches of perceptible rise in Scotland. That would probably be hard to notice. It may become much more noticeable before long. The evidence of Global Warming has been in my face, however, as I have watched the glaciers rapidly recede and have experienced surreal heat waves, but I don’t go to the ocean. On the east coast of the USA, it has been noticeable, as sea water is invading land and killing forests.

In this photo of me, from 2001 (yes, that is a Star Trek t-shirt ), behind me is Glacier Peak. At Wikipedia, on the article of glacier retreats since 1850, those photos at the top are of the retreat of White Chuck Glacier. That rocky mountain behind me in that picture is where White Chuck Glacier used to be. One of my favorite hiking guidebooks is less than 30 years old and it is badly out of date. Where the guidebooks refer to craggy glaciers that you can get close to, those glaciers are now shadows of their former selves or even gone.

So, sea level changes so far are going to be hard to notice in a lifetime, but the changes in my lifetime in the mountains in my home state have been dramatic. Soon before my uncle died, he expressed his amazement to me at how far Washington’s glaciers had receded in his lifetime.

Not everybody has such dramatic markers as those in their lives, but in a lifetime, Global Warming has been very noticeable around the world for those paying attention. When I lived in Ohio in the 1990s, a coworker lamented that we rarely got snow in the winters any longer. His childhood memories were snow to his waist regularly (like in Calvin and Hobbes). Those days are long gone in Ohio. The USA’s Tornado Alley has shifted east in my lifetime. The changes are far more dramatic in Alaska, as the permafrost melts.

For sea-level rises, what happens in Antarctica is the big show, and everything else is kind of trivial except Greenland. In virtually every study of Antarctic ice that I have seen in the past 30 years, it was worse than they thought. I have been reading about the Gulf Stream’s slowing down for 30 years, and it is looming (and there is plenty of debate). If the Gulf Stream goes, Scotland will become like Norway, but you probably won’t live to see it.

I am not a fan of Al Gore. I thought that there were problems with his presentation, but sea-level rises are real, they are happening, and what has happened so far could just be a gentle prelude to what you and I likely won’t live long enough to see.

Of course, free energy makes it all go away.

I hope that helps.

Best,

Wade

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
The evidence of Global Warming has been in my face, however, as I have watched the glaciers rapidly recede and ...

... Of course, free energy makes it all go away.

The implication I am reading into your reply here is that a major cause of global warming is human burning of coal and oil, which free energy would resolve.

Am I reading your words as implied, or am I seriously misunderstanding your words?

I absolutely agree that wide spread use of free energy technology to provide much of our energy would dramatically reduce the burning of coal and oil. That's a no-brainer. I quite hope that happens and quite appreciate the work of the few, the bold, the relentless such as yourself towards that day. The potential benefits to our civilization are beyond our ordinary understanding.

My thoughts on whether human activity is a significant contributor to global warming are almost certainly sufficiently polluted by my dislike of Al Gore that it would not be productive for me to further discuss that aspect here, or most anywhere else for that matter. Sic erit.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Paul:

Al Gore is a grandstanding politician. When Gore was a young man, spending his summers in Tennessee, he hung out with my editor’s crowd, smoking weed, before he began working on his image. Gore knows all about free energy, just like the billionaire “philanthropists” do, but none of them will utter a public peep about it.

But because Gore made a name for himself on the Global Warming issue does not invalidate it. This graphic is all human-caused (the last two centuries of it), and the rise in carbon dioxide and temperature is very straightforward, not denied by any credible scientist on Earth. The mechanism is easy to understand. Carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation. The End.

With free energy, not only would carbon-dioxide pollution end, but it would be easy to pick a carbon dioxide level and achieve it. But also, human welfare will no longer be dependent on the weather, so it would not matter much what carbon dioxide did, but I would vote for bringing it back to preindustrial levels, for the sake of our fellow species. We have already driven enough species to extinction. Time to repair some of the damage.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

Machiavelli wrote that more princes died from palace coups and assassinations than ever died from foreign invasions or battles. Lately, I have found myself reading of Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Byzantine, Ottoman, and Roman times, among others. It seemed that most kings and emperors in those days died at the hands of their associates, as Machiavelli wrote. Many times I read of sons slaughtering each other for the right of succession. Game of Thrones seems normal, as far as palace intrigues go. The brutality of those times was stunning. Only with industrialization did societies become very humane. When half of the children died, untimely deaths were everywhere. Roman emperors died violently all the time, often assassinated by the Praetorian Guard, who were allegedly the emperor’s bodyguards, but who were regularly the executioners.

Life was nearly always awful until the Industrial Revolution began to raise living standards and, most importantly, eliminated childhood death. The “settling” of the Western Hemisphere by Europeans is considered history’s greatest crime, and my ancestors eagerly participated in it. The USA is built on stolen land and the genocide of the natives. Nearly all early American presidents owned slaves. There is little to cheer about in American history. A Rockefeller heir once had lunch with one of Dennis Lee’s associates, and he said that he did not know of one American dynastic family that made its fortune honestly. They were all criminal enterprises. That is The American Way, but there is no need to think that it was unusual. Amassing wealth has always been a criminal enterprise. Only industrialization made that a more genteel process, but that has been relative. Dennis should be dead dozens of times over from his adventures, and mobsters had more honor than government officials did, as they did the bidding of their elite patrons.

Before I ever met Dennis, my father told me about how people who crossed the local land baron simply disappeared, and Gary Wean had a very interesting encounter with that land-baron “philanthropist,” who made his fortune in the drug trade. The judges controlled the drug trade in my home county, and that kind of corruption is in every county. Our systems are corrupt, from top to bottom.

About the time that we were getting the boom lowered on us in Ventura, I spoke with some elderly brothers from Eastern Europe who attended a conference where Max Gerson was poisoned. A couple of years later, I read of the repeated assassination attempts on Gerson by the medical racket. By that time, nothing about human behavior could surprise me.

The month after the darkest month of my journey, I met Gary, whose advice was critical for my springing Dennis from jail a couple of months later, in the biggest miracle that I ever witnessed. In Gary’s book about his adventures (and he survived his own murder attempt by the gangster judges and their associates), one chapter was devoted to the JFK assassination and how Gary knew three weeks after JFK’s murder that Oswald did not do it. I made a Substack post on the JFK hit.

For the past 35 years, I never saw a credible piece of JFK-hit evidence that contradicted Gary’s story, and new evidence continually supported Gary’s story, such as the Operation Northwoods plan. I am certain that JFK died in a conspiracy, and the CIA led the cover-up, especially Allen Dulles, who led the “investigation” of the death of the man who fired him and whom he despised. According to what E. Howard Hunt told the original Watergate attorney, JFK was murdered over the ET issue, which did not surprise me.

The second American president to die in office was Zachary Taylor, and there is evidence that he was poisoned with arsenic, was hard to kill, so the assassins had to poison him twice. Arsenic was used to poison Gerson, and arsenic was in the pesticides that caused polio.

Abraham Lincoln was obviously killed in a conspiracy, and there has been speculation for many years on how high that conspiracy might have ranged. Ronald Reagan was the first president since William Henry Harrison who was elected in a year that ended with zero and did not die in office, and he nearly did.

If a person accepts that JFK died in a conspiracy, then it would be nonsensical to think that Bobby Kennedy was killed by a Lone Nut. From JFK to Reagan (including Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcom X, George Wallace, Gerald Ford, and John Lennon), assassination seemed to be a spook sport. It is legitimate to wonder if any of the presidential deaths while in office were really what they have been officially portrayed to be.

Reagan’s and Lennon’s shooters worked for a CIA front organization run by a good friend of the Bush family. In fact, Reagan’s shooter was a member of that family, for one of the many “it’s a small world” aspects of those assassinations and attempts. Allen Dulles knew both of Oswald’s suspected CIA handlers in Dallas, for instance.

Rodney Stich was an FAA investigator who got in way over his head and was kangarooed into prison in California like Dennis was, by the CIA and friends. Stich was privy to wiretap tapes that the FBI had from J. Edgar Hoover’s phone, which showed that Hoover planned the JFK hit with Lyndon Johnson, Nelson Rockefeller, Allen Dulles, and George H.W. Bush. None of that surprised me in the slightest. I have long suspected that the Eastern Oligarchy and Military Industrial Complex were behind the JFK hit because he was trying to end the Cold War, and that is the perfect cast of characters for it.

I long suspected that Donald Trump would be assassinated when the legal stratagems to derail him had failed, as he was no career politician and was not easily bought. The first assassination attempt is being attributed to Secret Service incompetence that beggars the imagination. I have to wonder about that miracle of incompetence.

Free-energy inventors have come to untimely deaths for many years. California officials repeatedly put Dennis in position to be murdered by the inmates, and it nearly worked. Gary wrote of how the gangsters in Ventura County rigged planes to crash to eliminate their targets, and Gary suspected that the aircraft deaths of John Tower, John Heinz, and Audie Murphy were just too convenient. The politician who had those FBI tapes died in the KLA crash. We had the “Watergate crash,” the politically convenient deaths of Paul Wellstone and Mel Carnahan, and other untimely and politically convenient aircraft deaths.

Eugene Mallove’s murder spooked Brian O’Leary, who immediately began planning his move to South America, and I did not blame him. Brian’s life was shortened when he poked into the UFO issue.

When Steven Greer mounted Congressional hearings on the UFO/ET issue, several people involved suddenly came down with strange and advanced forms of cancer, and only Greer survived it. When William Colby contacted Greer’s effort to transfer some exotic tech to them, Colby was found floating in a river a few days afterward.

In summary, there is not one American assassination or untimely death of politicians and other inconvenient people, such as those involved in the free-energy and UFO/ET fields, that I accept at face value, as the official explanations nearly always ignore or actively dismiss any conspiratorial aspects of them.

Best,

Wade

[ThePythonicCow]

It would be counter-productive to the important mission of Wade's work and this thread for me to discuss global warming issues.

I only refer, once more, to that issue in order to distinguish it from a related issue that I think is highly relevant to the success of Wade's work.

The "solution" which I understand is being proposed by John F'n Kerry and associates to global warming concerns is "carbon credits."

I take that to mean that they (as spokesman for the deep state) seek to micro-manage, surveil and control, the expenditure of energy by each of us, down to the individual watt-second (aka joule) level, world-wide. In addition to our bank accounts of dollars and cents (or whatever our local currency units are), we'd also have an energy account of carbon credits. If we overdrew that account (or if we pissed off John Kerry by misrepresenting his middle name as "F'n", or whatever such), then our electricity could be cut off. Some Amish and old school farmers and woodsmen have the skills and tools to carry on in that case, but most of us would soon be struggling desperately.

Just as "they" seek to micromanage what we speak, read, write and hear, what we drink and eat, when and where we go, what we spend, save, and earn, our health, thoughts, feelings, family and community, so "they" seek to micromanage our energy consumption. It's not, in my view, that "they" are worried so much about running out of watts, words, water, or wheat. Rather it's that the (usually overly hyped and fraudulently distorted) threat of essential resources to life, family, community and civilization being unreliable, fraudulent (e.g. voting), or scarce is used to justify micromanaging surveillance and control mechanisms over humanity.

In short, if carbon credits prevail and become persistent, then I predict that "free energy" technology will become another tool of the evil bastards to control humanity, rather than becoming an essential technology for the blossoming of a higher level of human civilization as Wade anticipates. If the next generation of Rockefeller's controls my energy consumption down the individual watt, then it matters little to me whether they got that watt from an oil well or a free energy device.

(It amuses one part of my mind to note that I could make a quite similar claim for Bitcoin, but that's waay off topic for this thread.)

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Paul:

I am very OK with discussing Global Warming issues, as long as we can agree on the basics:

• Carbon dioxide traps infrared radiation, which warms Earth;
• Carbon dioxide levels are skyrocketing due to burning fossil fuels.
• That is going to make Earth warmer than it would otherwise be.

I don’t know of a scientist on Earth who will dispute that. What oil company shills do is obfuscate those issues with all sorts of trivial and misleading issues and data, to create an illusion that dupes people who want to believe that their actions have no consequences.

On Kerry, et al., yes, their “solutions” are evil. But they can only micromanage something that is scarce. When it is abundant, it will no longer work. That is the crux of the issue, as I see it. That is why you won’t see any elites on Earth uttering a peep about free energy, although they all know about it. They know that it means Game Over.

Best,

Wade

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
I am very OK with discussing Global Warming issues, as long as we can agree on the basics:

Ah - but we don't agree on such basics. So best I stay out of that discussion here.

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
But they can only micromanage something that is scarce. When it is abundant, it will no longer work. That is the crux of the issue, as I see it.

I quite agree. The challenge, for them, and hence for us, will be whether "they" can keep control of the "allowed" (by us useless eaters) means of energy production.

Once such means (the means, not just the product thereof) as "free" energy are widely available, it's game over for their "scarce" energy gambit.

"They" have managed, for substantial periods of time, over various broad swaths of our civilization, to control or limit public access to:

• tools of personal protection (aka guns),
• honest, healthy food,
• honest, healing medicine,
• honest, non-usurious money,
• clean, healthy water,
• more efficient cooling and transport engines,
• honest voting,
• "classical" education,
• the best available sciences,
• our real history,
• the best available news,
• ... and so on.

Just because "they" have something, even when it is public knowledge what that something is and that some of "them" have it, even when some traditional societies have long had access to it, that doesn't mean that we, the ordinary humans, the masses, the useless eaters, are allowed to have it.

Unfortunately, whether or not the "Global Warming" issues you accurately itemized are true could be a useful key, though (fortunately) not an essential key, to this discussion. Those very "Global Warming" issues might be revealed, in such an open discussion, as false scare tactics, which would then further expose the "Global Warming" discussion as a scare tactic to help justify the imposition of global "carbon credits" micro-management of humanity's activity and energy consumption.

However for now, it is best I stay out of that particular discussion here, while we choose not to agree on the premises of such a discussion.

Meanwhile, I am hoping in these last few posts of mine to inquire whether we might agree that:

• broad imposition of "carbon credits" micro-management of humanity's activity and energy consumption,
• prior to broad public availability of the tools, means and methods to produce "free energy",
• could lead to a further, major, setback of the advances in our civilization that we would both relish.

In other words, including some of your words I believe, can we productively discuss this question:

Can they micromanage energy while it is still scarce, and then keep it scarce (as they have with so much else I listed above) thereafter, even as they then publicly use "free energy" to power our energy grid, just as they have been doing with "nuclear" and "atomic" energy generation since 1951?

If this question too, for whatever reason, does not, for now at least, provide fertile soil for a productive discussion here, then that's fine. It is very important, to all of us, that I don't further distract this thread from your vital work.

I ask this question, even at the risk of distracting from your vital work here, because I view the following possible scenario as quite possible, and quite dangerous for the well being and further advancement of humanity.

Could the evil bastards:

1. Use "global warming" scare tactics to help impose "carbon credit" micromanagement,
2. Publicly introduce, but continue to privately control, "free energy" production,
3. Power the public energy grid with such "free energy" means, and then
4. Continue to use "carbon credit" micromanagement to keep energy scarce?

The end result could empower the evil bastards with a tool for our enslavement even more powerful than the usurious debt-money that has been one of their favorite tools of enslavement in recent centuries.

I will not stand for such a result.

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

For any topic of study, the goal for honest people is learning the truth. The ideals of science and scholarship are about pursuing the truth. In a world of scarcity and fear, when everything is corrupt, those ideals can seem to be unscalable mountains, but caring and honest people still try. Some topics are trivial and some are the most important on Earth. The biggest issue on Earth right now is solving the energy issue, permanently. Everything else is noise. The technology to permanently solve the energy issue and end the world as we know it is older than I am, but has been sequestered from public awareness and use for reasons of Earthly power, in history’s greatest cover-up. More than 99% of humanity is either ignorant of that situation or reacts to it with denial and fear. I seek the tiny fraction of humanity that loves the truth more than that. They should be enough, if they can be educated and can unite their efforts. I know who I am looking for.

Ed Herman’s life’s work was about showing how the American mainstream media (and all capitalist media) is about brainwashing the public on behalf of elite interests. Ed used a scientific approach with statistical rigor (1, 2), which his critics have never fairly addressed. His work remains unrebutted.

I have long argued that retail politics is worthless for solving the existential problems that we face. As Bucky Fuller said, politicians are stooges of the economic interests. But it became worse in the USA with the murder of John F. Kennedy. In my opinion, the American presidency was permanently demoted with JFK’s murder, and all American presidents since him have been puppets and knew it. The sitting American president is a long ways down the hierarchy of power on Earth. The loud-and-clear message sent by JFK’s murder and cover-up to all succeeding presidents was: “You are expendable.”

I recently wrote two posts, on the energy and medical rackets and how the political left and right have abdicated the quest for the truth in favor of the ideologies that feed them. The right genuflects to the energy racket while the left does the same thing with the medical racket. They both sing the Rockefellers’ tune (1, 2) while thinking that they are challenging the elite.

I have inside information on JFK’s murder that I received from a former policeman, Gary Wean, whose advice was critical for springing my partner from jail, in the biggest miracle that I ever witnessed. Over 35 years of study later, I know of no more spectacular evidence to falsify the official view on the JFK hit than Gary’s testimony. A chapter of his book was devoted to the issue. I have no doubt that Gary recalled the John Tower conversation to the best of his recollection. According to the conversation, Oswald was part of a CIA effort to frame Castro for an assassination attempt of JFK, to justify an invasion of Cuba. While some JFK-hit efforts have given Gary’s testimony a place of prominence, most have not. I have seen various reasons for ignoring or dismissing his testimony, and some efforts have cherry-picked parts of it that suit their pet theories.

The decade after Gary published his book, the Operation Northwoods document was declassified. The Joint Chief’s plan was to stage fake terrorist incidents and frame Castro for them. The CIA’s and Joint Chief’s operations were actually concurrent, although the Joint Chief’s version never got off the drawing board, as far as I know.

In light of the Northwoods document alone, Gary’s testimony should have been the center-of-gravity of all JFK-hit efforts for the past generation. There is nothing remotely close in the JFK-hit canon to a validated insider’s perspective such as Tower’s. The evidence does not get any better than that. Gary was a policeman and investigator. Our lives were ruined by the same people. Whistleblowers such as Gary do not do it to get rich, tell tall tales, etc. Gary was a right-wing version of Ralph McGehee and Rodney Stich. There were not many like them, and they all had hell to pay. I have been called a whistleblower, but I was not on the inside of most situations that I write about, except maybe auditing.

Gary also had important testimony about Jack Ruby, who was a high-ranking mobster, not the two-bit nightclub owner that the Warren Commission portrayed him as. In a recent Israel-did-it book, the author cherry-picked Gary’s Ruby encounters while omitting his John Tower encounter, because it did not align with this theory. The bizarre part of that is that Gary is the originator of the Israel-did-it hypothesis of the JFK hit. Gary, being a professional investigator, tried his hand at solving the crime, but that is theory, while his encounters with Tower and Ruby are evidence. That author who reproduced Gary’s chapter on the JFK hit conflated the two to dismiss it all. That is irrational, to put it kindly.

The standards of science and scholarship can be applied to the JFK hit, as far as what is the best evidence, what is less so, what is speculation, and what is falsified or confirmed. That conspiracist who took me to task on the JFK hit, arguing that it was a big hoax, provided zero evidence for his assertion, which is typical of conspiracists, in my experience. They rarely deal in solid evidence, but instead purvey flimsy evidence, if evidence at all, leavened by crazed and often-paranoid speculation.

This is a huge topic that I cannot do justice to in one post, but coming posts with deal with aspects of this issue.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Paul:

I can’t recall the exact language right now, but I have seen conspiracists talk for many years, and it goes something like this:

• The elites make fortunes creating a problem;
• Then they make fortunes managing the problem that they created.

I have seen this play out many times in my lifetime. As I write this, we inch closer to nuclear war in Ukraine, and this was a very predictable outcome of expanding NATO as the USA has. I have written about how it is happening in the medical racket today. When I spoke at Department of Energy hearings, the man who ran the hearings admitted that nuclear waste management was a racket. I could provide several other examples of this that I have written about.

All elite “solutions” to our energy problems, including Global Warming, are more of the same. I have no argument with that, as the playbook works, as the sheeple shuffle along. The vast majority of humanity is fast asleep and is easily exploited by playing to their fears, greed, complacency, addictions, etc. I know that Global Warming is real, as I have been watching it happen in my lifetime. I don’t need to see the arguments and evidence out there, although I have studied the issue at great length. I have seen it with my own eyes.

Tomorrow, I see a college roommate for what may be the last time, as he is dying of brain cancer, likely caused by the COVID vaccine, and that is a forbidden topic. Like I have with others, I get to watch him needlessly die, as he believes in the system to his grave. I have known him for nearly 50 years, little of my journey has rubbed off on him, and he witnessed a lot of it. He is about as smart as I am, too. If I can’t reach him, when his life is at stake, who can I reach? Well, I know who I can reach, but not many of them walk the Earth today. But there are enough for my plan to work.

I have found that “exposing” evil elite plans sure does not stop them. Nearly everybody will either deny them or go into paranoiac obsession about them. I don’t let elite plans get much space in my brain. I aim to take out their entire foundation, which is to bring abundance to the world. Then their games will no longer work, and really won’t make sense any longer.

Free energy is a genie that the global elite have not let out of the bottle, although Greer’s sources say that most want to now, if the choice is losing their power or making Earth uninhabitable. I’ll buy that. The stuff that you see, of Kerry, Gates, WEF, and the like are the retail elite. They don’t run the show on Earth. I try to not pay much attention to them, as I also try to ignore the retail political system. They are not where the real power is. It is actually in each of us, if we woke up, but that is a story for another day.

Best,

Wade

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
I know that Global Warming is real, as I have been watching it happen in my lifetime.

I'm sure your life style is more likely to be aware of the climate than mine; the only tan I've gotten in the last half century is from my computer terminal, ever since I discovered computers back then.

So I'm not competent, from actual experience, to discuss whether global warming is occurring.

However I do study, amongst many things, in my amateur way, weather, astronomy, our earth and sun and solar system, and such things.

Where I likely differ from your view is whether our burning of "fossil" fuels is a substantial contributor to potentially dangerous changes in earth's climate.

Just because global warming, by the testimony of yourself and others, is happening doesn't mean our human activity is its primary cause.

===

But, still, I see little opportunity here for us resolving our different view on question of what causes the climate changes you observe, and I really do not want to distract this thread from your mission, as manifest in this thread.

Rather I do wish to send a warning:

If "carbon credit" micromanagement is successfully instituted, then "bringing abundance to the world" this way will not "take out their entire foundation". Rather it will provide them the finest foundation they could imagine for their tyranny, an infinite supply of energy that they totally micromanage.

If anthropomorphic global warming really is a serious problem, as I take it to be your understanding, then we do NOT need "carbon credit" micromanagement. Just quit burning carbon fuels and use our better energy technology instead.

Perhaps then we can agree on what is my primary point to be made here, even if we arrived at this common point by driving around opposite sides of the block:

• Just say no to "carbon credit" micromanagement.

If the elite bastards micromanaged all our energy consumption, then only those same elite bastards would be assured of reaping the benefits of the abundance that free energy provides.

What's worse, they would get to define what "abundance" meant for them. Since they would have total control over all the resources humans require to live and organizations require to operate, as all such resources require energy, therefore "abundance" for them could turn out to be "tyranny" for us, at least for those of us (perhaps the unluckiest ones of us) who survived their mass cullings. Given that absolute power corrupts absolutely, I would expect no better of the elite bastards who gained such power. The Rockefeller clan would be green with jealousy.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Paul:

As you say, it will probably not be productive to discuss Global Warming, but I have a few comments to make. The strategy of Fred Singer and friends was to initially deny that Global Warming was happening. When that strategy failed, the fallback position was that while conceding that Global Warming is real, human activities had nothing to do with it. Their third strategy was to stress the benefits of increasing carbon dioxide, such as making plants grow faster, while ignoring all of the damage. I saw Mercola publish just such an article in the last year, attached, as he was duped by the Singer-style propagandists. Mercola has been seduced by plenty of bright shiny objects over the years.

The fact is that the “radiative forcing” brought on by carbon dioxide (which bounces infrared photons back at Earth) has been considered the primary determinant of Earth’s surface temperature (after sunlight ) since the early days of climate science. I began to see that when I studied paleology (Earth’s ancient past, going back to when it was formed), and carbon dioxide levels were always considered to be the primary determinant of Earth’s temperature, even though the Sun is 30% brighter than it was billions of years ago. Earth’s declining carbon dioxide levels are why Earth has not turned into Venus. Anyway, it is a big subject that I will drop for now, other than to note that I looked at all of the objections to Global Warming, including how rising carbon dioxide levels were not responsible, or that burning fossil fuels had nothing to do with rising carbon dioxide levels, and none of those objections were credible in the slightest. They were all Fox News talking points.

Evil elite plans are as old as civilization. We could get into Gates and WHO and the new draconian powers that he is seeking, that are the medical racket’s version of the carbon credits that worry you so much. Again, Gates, the WHO, the Rockefellers, etc., are not at the top of the world’s power structure, and their plans will only work if the sheeple line up, and they almost always do. But most Americans are suspecting that something is awry, with what happened during the pandemic. Most no longer trust the mainstream media. Progress has been made, but I am not counting on them to turn the tide.

Free energy means a thousand times and more available energy for humanity, and the “carbon credit” system will not survive that. I believe that they know it is the beginning of the end of their reign if free energy ever makes its public appearance. It is just way too transformative to keep under their thumb to enact a global tyranny, although they may still try. They tried to wipe us out repeatedly, and here I still am, writing like I do. The darkness is far from all-powerful. They have not forgotten about me, but I don’t obsess about evil plans, as that is reactive and victim-oriented, and I have watched people lose their sanity when doing that. Only proactive acts, of focusing on the goal, will get us there, IMO.

Best,

Wade

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Free energy means a thousand times and more available energy for humanity, and the “carbon credit” system will not survive that.

So it seems we do agree on the end result ... carbon credits (will/must/can) not survive widely available free energy.

Being a paranoid conspiracy theory nutcase, I figure we'll have to push carbon credits off the cliff before free energy becomes widely available.

Given your far far greater than mine involvement for many years with free energy, you're confident that carbon credits will most certainly fall off the cliff on their own accord, on or before the arrival of free energy.

Either way works for me. Good.

I may have arrived at the cliff from the road in the valley below, and you may have arrived at the cliff by climbing the mountain and looking down on the cliff. But we see the same thing.

So be it.

May you carry on your good work, sir.

[Wade Frazier]

From Substack:

The day that I met Dennis Lee, he spoke at the Seattle Center in front of several hundred people and several news camera crews. A few days later, I saw the only positive TV coverage of Dennis that I ever saw, on a Canadian news show. Several days later, a Seattle news show about Dennis aired, and it was criminally deceptive. Everybody who bought Dennis’s heat pump and followed his directions for filing for Carter’s tax credit got it. Thousands of people did it right. In Seattle, that reporter found one customer who did not follow the directions and was initially denied. Out of Seattle’s 400 customers who filed, one did not do it right and was initially denied. That reporter used that one customer to announce that Dennis’s heat pump did not qualify for the tax credit. That reporter went on to have a long career as a “consumer protection” reporter. Could that reporter have been stupid enough to believe what she reported? Or was she following somebody’s orders? That was my first inkling that maybe the media did not pursue the truth.

Over the next four years, before I ever heard of Ed Herman, I got both barrels of how the media lies. How much was Ed’s Propaganda Model filters in action, and how much was just sheer criminality by the media? When I saw the cub reporter during Dennis’s preliminary hearing essentially take dictation from Mr. Deputy, that could have been the sourcing filter in action, but that cub reporter knew what he was doing. After I sprung Dennis from jail and we had the spectacle of a prosecutorial misconduct hearing, and the cub reporter was subpoenaed for his role, he suddenly began writing accurate articles. He knew how to write accurate articles, but that was not his job.

But the officials acted far more criminally than the media did, such as the day of the raid, when they stole our technical material. When I had my day on the witness stand, and Mr. Deputy tried to intimidate me while I testified, it was my life-changing moment. When Mr. Investigator later admitted that he did not care if his prosecutorial targets were innocent or not, and that he would lie as much as he had to in order to gain his coveted convictions, nothing about human behavior could surprise me anymore.

I am not a mind reader and do not know what those people were thinking. I only have their actions to go on. How much was conscious criminality, and how much was just doing their jobs and heading down the slippery slope of abandoning the ideals of their professions for successful careers, as they got their hands bloody? I doubt any of them knew that they were ultimately following orders of the global elite, as they helped derail a threat to their global dictatorship. Those are examples of how organized suppression is nearly all structural, not conspiratorial, in that 1% and conspiracy and 99% complicity ratio that I often cite.

Best,

Wade