The 2024 US POTUS Election - and now the aftermath

[OnyxKnight]

Posted by TravelerJim (here)
For the 2020 election Biden had 81MM votes and Trump had 74MM. In this 2024 election Harris had 67MM votes and Trump had 72MM.

We are being sold on the idea that Trump had this massive red wave of votes from rural areas and that he made amazing inroads into the black, Hispanic, and other demographic groups. Yet he had 2MM less votes than last time. So what voters did he lose from 2020 to 2024 to account for having less votes this go around than in 2020 even though he made all these inroads?

.....

Thoughts?

Its the hardcore conservative votes. It was bound to happen.

[Tintin]

Posted by OnyxKnight (here)

All of the astrologers, or at least almost all of them predicted Kamala winning. And they were all wrong.

I saw this earlier from Bernhard Guenther on X, and, I do have to agree. I'd also responded suggesting a very similar issue with the gifted remote viewers - and they are actually - at the Farsight Institute whose talents are certainly not being fully utilised, certainly regarding meaningful targets, and that correlating with Courtenay Brown's clear biases in his sometimes very rambling introductions tends to appeal to these "leftist" sentiments. It's not helpful, and rather makes them all look a bit foolish, unfortunately.

Here's this from Bernhard:

""Why did so many astrologers predict that Kamala would win?"

Because most astrologers are leftist liberals who have TDS and/or a bias/wishful thinking through which they "interpret" the charts.

Astrological interpretations are only as good as the level of consciousness of the person reading the chart.

Most popular astrologers are not individuated but part of the mainstream consensus, programmed and conditioned by society/culture, propaganda, and lies that unconsciously "poison" their interpretations.

Many astrologers also approach astrology with a very left brain and miss the psychic, intuitive, non-linear creative insights and talent.

Prediction is also a tricky business, to begin with, for none of us can see with the "eyes of the Divine" but are caught in the tunnel vision of the mind."

Of course he isn't tarring everyone with this brush but there does seem to be a tendency here.

[OnyxKnight]

Posted by Tintin (here)
I saw this earlier from Bernhard Guenther on X, and, I do have to agree. I'd also responded suggesting a very similar issue with the gifted remote viewers - and they are actually - at the Farsight Institute whose talents are certainly not being fully utilised, certainly regarding meaningful targets, and that correlating with Courtenay Brown's clear biases in his sometimes very rambling introductions tends to appeal to these "leftist" sentiments. It's not helpful, and rather makes them all look a bit foolish, unfortunately.

Here's this from Bernhard:

.....

Of course he isn't tarring everyone with this brush but there does seem to be a tendency here.

Indeed. I think being right-wing, even centrist/moderate might not be as compatible with the overall spiritually-ideological philosophy of tarot, astrology, alternative healing, reiki energy work, etc. There has been an emphasis that our planet, even though carrying a feminine energy, been drowned in masculine "destructive" tendencies from our species and we need to return to the "divine feminine" (many alternative societies practice modern day goddess worship as well), and I have noticed for a long time in our circles, ever since I was about 14-15 y.o. I am not at all surprised they thought she would win, it makes every ounce of sense to them that she would, in such a pivotal moment in history, as many seem to think we are in right now.

Another, maybe a bit just as kooky way to look at it, might be that they were right, but we "switched timelines" in the last moment. Whatever path a Kamala presidency would have led us, good or bad, has been rendered null. For us here anyway, experiencing this.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Posted by OnyxKnight (here)

Posted by TravelerJim (here)
For the 2020 election Biden had 81MM votes and Trump had 74MM. In this 2024 election Harris had 67MM votes and Trump had 72MM.

We are being sold on the idea that Trump had this massive red wave of votes from rural areas and that he made amazing inroads into the black, Hispanic, and other demographic groups. Yet he had 2MM less votes than last time. So what voters did he lose from 2020 to 2024 to account for having less votes this go around than in 2020 even though he made all these inroads?

.....

Thoughts?

Its the hardcore conservative votes. It was bound to happen.

My immediate thought is that the truly blatant discrepancy is where did the 14 million extra votes disappear to for the Democrats?

Don't forget, they are still trying to steal the down ballot votes for House representatives...
Last time, the down ballot made it to the finish for the Republicans even though Trump 'lost'.
This time trump wins, but looses the down ballot ticket.

That is why same day paper ballot voting and voter ID is so important for America.

[OnyxKnight]

Posted by Ernie Nemeth (here)
My immediate thought is that the truly blatant discrepancy is where did the 14 million extra votes disappear to for the Democrats?

Don't forget, they are still trying to steal the down ballot votes for House representatives...
Last time, the down ballot made it to the finish for the Republicans even though Trump 'lost'.
This time trump wins, but looses the down ballot ticket.

That is why same day paper ballot voting and voter ID is so important for America.

That's an interesting question. I don't know.

I do know that the Dems have been "bleeding" democrat voters to independents, libertarians and republicans for the last ... 16 years? Ever since the Obama days. But it has exponentially increased since Trump entered politics.

Just look at the #WalkAway movement alone and how many are in it (all former dems). There are other initiatives and movements as well.

I don't know if its related to what you asked - but it needs taking into account.

[SilentFeathers]

Coming up soon.....

Should be interesting to "decode" his language....(If you can understand him)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3OmadYAynL4

[Ernie Nemeth]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
We have had some political concerns expressed here from our Canadian members - here is my concern - get this WEF-backed petty dictator out of power!

I watched him closely during the COVID lockdowns and Truckers' protest and the authoritarian rule was concerning.

https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1854509111678746846

My eyes are opened.

Canada was never free. It is an oligarchy of political pundits that represent the uniparty of globalist scum.


Since the Reform Party from Alberta overturned the Conservative party, the Conservatives are no longer conservative. There is no opposition except for the communist NDP, and the separatist Bloc Quebecois.

Only the PPC, People's Party of Canada still stands as the only truly conservative party. But perception will keep the PPC out of power.


Canada was long ago captured and conquered.

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by Tintin (here)

Posted by Helvetic (here)
Source: David Icke on X


Description:

America is simply being led to the same AI control cliff edge via another route using different rhetoric and different Pied Pipers (controlled by the same masters). Naivety may be touching sometimes, but in the end it is always a disaster waiting to happen.
The new president - and it would have been the same with Harris.

David Icke's been on a real downer lately. He has of course been ahead of the game for a long time now, and I still do respect him, however, for a large chunk of recent time he seems to be sulking (the sense that he's being ignored, somehow), or his ego has gotten a hold. I get the "Zionist" reference of course here but Netanyahu I'm certain is a dead duck domestically politically, so he should perhaps have used a different image.

If Donald J Trump is foolish enough to rattle his sabre at Iran - he provoked them before with the assassination of Solemaini remember? - then it's goodbye to Israel, and by rote, Netanyahu too.

David: we get it man. Just lighten up a bit.

Tintin, I have to disagree. There is most certainly Trump Derangement Syndrome, and I note the most prominent feature is that the Democrat cult NEVER underscored Trump thinking/policy that was actually "bad behavior" because they were guilty of the same major misdeeds and policy. Support of Zionism and Palestinian genocide being the big one. Venezuela policy, as another obvious example of Democrat + Republican support. Support of CIA regime-change/assassination attempts and successes, Juan Guaido declared as president, crippling sanctions... Crushing Syria and making sure they cannot rebuild (all done for the Zionazis), ongoing theft of part of Syria (Golan Heights) by Israel, so they can steal Syria's oil. US soldiers guard the Syrian oil fields theft.

So the Dems never dare actually say out loud what makes Trump an insane warmongering Zionist, (and fully linked to Global Corporate Network, and ecocidal, and classist/exploitative of citizenry) because they would be outing themselves for the same policy/behavior.

But there is another syndrome, and it is displayed LOUDLY on this forum, and I'd call it Trump Deification Syndrome. It's far beyond the comparison rhetoric, where an overall conclusion of which miscreant is BETTER than the other miscreant is the intellectual exercise, and then whomever is deemed as BETTER is then magically stripped of all their traits/ideas/policies/agenda that are negative, leaving a demigod. I suspect Icke isn't willing to dismiss reality to pretend to feel good about a different Zionist getting elected as US president.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Coming up soon.....

Should be interesting to "decode" his language....(If you can understand him)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3OmadYAynL4

Speech starts at about 29 minutes in this video.

Once again Biden strongly pushes the narrative and how he assured Trump in a phone call of a commitment to peaceful transfer of power next January.

These people are pathological liars and hypocrites and I'm not buying it. Like Dennis said in a previous post, it's "Plausible deniability" (at it's finest).

This narrative being pushed by the democrats, MSM, and the Biden Administration of a "Commitment to democracy and to a peaceful transfer of power" next January is troubling to say the least. I personally don't believe for a second that they are capable of this, especially to of all people, Donald Trump.

To trust these lunatics and liars right now is extremely dangerous.

[Ernie Nemeth]

I can't believe I watched over 800 Trump rallies...is that right?

I heard Trump did over 900 rallies in nine years. That's more than one rally per every four days. For nine years straight!

I made sure to watch most of them...

[Ernie Nemeth]

An observation.

As an expert on Trump rallies, something just occurred to me.

To be fair:
Not once did I ever hear Trump speak of the war in the middle east. His only comment on the issue was to sidestep it and talk of the Abraham Accord and occasionally mention the embassy move to Jerusalem. His stance on the actual war is unknown, besides his actions as 45 might suggest, and who he favours, even if he favours either side, is a not a public policy position.

[Bill Ryan]

I think this is light relief.

https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1854302494890877234

Are you awake yet?
[...referring to—> ]

TRUMP: “Who knows, maybe we’ll pay off our 35 trillion dollars, hand them a little crypto check. We’ll hand them a little Bitcoin and wipe out our 35 trillion dollars.”

~~~

[BMJ]

So what's next ???

Ex-Top Official Catherine Austin Fitts: Inside Trump’s Victory, RFK Jr., and the Deep State

Former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President George H.W. Bush, Catherine Austin Fitts, shares her insights on Donald Trump’s recent victory in the U.S. presidential election, the rising influence of independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the impact of the so-called ‘Deep State’ on American politics. According to Fitts, change isn’t on the horizon—it’s happening right now. She also discusses the historic surge of independent voters, a movement that could permanently reshape the future of U.S. politics as we know it.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YTArsszj5gk

[lunaflare]

I liked Biden's speech a lot. He had a great script writer! It felt dignified and a true concession speech in terms of seeing the necessity to step forward with a vision of peace and unity as a nation.

I think there is trepidation surrounding the loads of laundry the Trump team are going to tend to when in office.
A lot of high profile people have dirty laundry.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
I think this is light relief.

https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1854302494890877234

Are you awake yet?
[...referring to—> ]

TRUMP: “Who knows, maybe we’ll pay off our 35 trillion dollars, hand them a little crypto check. We’ll hand them a little Bitcoin and wipe out our 35 trillion dollars.”

~~~

Not quite sure this has anything to do with what's really going on, but something big is happening right now.

I'm sure you've noticed in the last couple of posts of mine that I am convinced something isn't right with the behavior coming from the democrats right now with them seemly waving the white flag and vowing a peaceful transfer of power for Trump.

I don't trust them, I don't believe them, and I think they are faking this and have something up their sleeve. But none the less, I've been brainstorming this strange behavior for other possibilities.

Some possibilities: The Democrats are either lying, scared of something, being blackmailed, or they have Trump in their back pocket somehow. I'm not sure I buy into any of these possibilities.

Then I got to thinking about what has recently changed that really stands out. The only thing I can think of is when Trump got shot in the face and how naïve he acted when it came to the possibility of the SS being compromised. This whole assassination attempt was so messed up, covered up, even a child would see the flaws in the narrative. But, something happened about that same time that may be even bigger that many don't even talk about and may actually have more to do with how things are today and why we are seeing certain things playing out as they are. Elon Musk came on to the scene and completely aligned himself with Trump.

Any one that's dove in to what Elon Musk is involved with will know Space X, Telsa, and Twitter X is just the tip of the iceberg. Elon easily walks in both worlds when it comes to good and evil. He's involved in some of the most advanced things in human history and also with some of the most notorious people and businesses on the planet. Elon Musk aligning himself with Trump recently I would argue is possibly a bigger event than Trump getting shot in the face in Butler at that rally. The democrats were targeting Elon and when Elon seen Trump get shot in the face I'm sure he considered he might be next. It was that evening of the shooting that I think Elon came out publicly and began his alignment with Trump.

I'm sure Elon and Trump have had talks about crypto and bitcoin, but there's a lot more than that I'm sure they've talked about.

I really don't know what I'm trying to say, but, with what ever is really going on right now Elon may be playing a huge part in it.

[mojo]

and now the aftermath

Waking up the next day after the election was my aftermath that's for sure. I felt better. The ride will be interesting.

[Jaak]

Trump wont drain the swamp from any zionists because he is one of them. Aint he also jesuit?

[Vangelo]

[T Smith]

Posted by TravelerJim (here)
For the 2020 election Biden had 81MM votes and Trump had 74MM. In this 2024 election Harris had 67MM votes and Trump had 72MM.

We are being sold on the idea that Trump had this massive red wave of votes from rural areas and that he made amazing inroads into the black, Hispanic, and other demographic groups. Yet he had 2MM less votes than last time. So what voters did he lose from 2020 to 2024 to account for having less votes this go around than in 2020 even though he made all these inroads?

IMO the Dems, Chinese, etc., manufactured millions of votes in 2020. I think a lot of the 2024 votes were manufactured but at a lower rate. So...why did the Dems seem to "stand down" this time around? Were too many people watching too closely? Were election laws changed to where they couldn't get away with as much? Did threats from Trump that cheaters would be prosecuted scare people away from the ballot dumps etc. that were quite common in 2020?

In a nutshell, the numbers at least to me don't make sense matched against the narrative.

Thoughts?

2020 was a complete farce. Millions upon millions of votes were injected and tallied after the five states shut down counting on election night. All these votes were fraudulent. My guess is they had to inject some Trump votes in that mix to make the ratio of fraudulent votes plausible, e.g. the fake votes were reportedly being tabulated in the exact ratio of 9:1.

This time around the RNC successfully blocked tens of thousands of fraudulent votes being counted before election day via successful law suits litigated during the early vote count, before election day. The RNC literally found tens of thousands of votes that were being duplicated or submitted illegally that the courts threw out. There were also truck loads of ballots reportedly being delivered for count around mid-night (the so-called "blue shift" that never happened) that were intercepted this time given eyes on the ground.

In short, 2020 was a complete scam, enabled because of COVID. They (dems) tried this time around (2024), but couldn't pull it off.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
I don't trust them, I don't believe them, and I think they are faking this and have something up their sleeve. But none the less, I've been brainstorming this strange behavior for other possibilities.

Some possibilities: The Democrats are either lying, scared of something, being blackmailed, or they have Trump in their back pocket somehow. I'm not sure I buy into any of these possibilities.

My hunch is that the Democrats have more (nasty, in my view) moves they intend to pull off, but that when the limelight is quite predictably on them, they endeavor to appear as the good guys. It's the other side they want to paint as the bad guys, whenever they can arrange that.

An added benefit of losing this election graciously is that it diffuses election reform efforts. In a city run by bank robbers, those running the city want you to trust all the banks. The day after those robbers failed in a major heist is a great day to encourage everyone to trust the banks.