The Wokeness Epidemic

[ExomatrixTV]

• Piers Morgan EVISCERATES Trump hating WOKE Host:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=AMmzyKZkaOY

00:00 - THE PREVIEW
00:45 - The intro
00:57 - Piers Morgan VS WOKE host
03:07 - Consider leaving a thumbs up
03:20 - Piers Morgan VS WOKE host
08:51 - My final thoughts

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Rise of the Woke Right: James Lindsay Exposes the Truth!:

Join James Lindsay as he dives deep into the phenomenon of the 'Woke Right.' In this eye-opening discussion, we explore what this term means and its implications for contemporary political dialogue. Are we witnessing a new wave of conservatism shaped by anti-woke sentiments? Don't miss out on this engaging conversation that challenges conventional narratives. Subscribe for the full episode coming soon and stay informed about the evolving cultural landscape!

• source

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VT8Yqndp3rA

00:00:00 Introduction
00:00:35 Is This The End Of Wokeness?
00:22:20 ExpressVPN Advert
00:23:37 Is This Going To Get Ugly?
00:30:42 The Divisiveness
00:43:22 Munk Debates Advert
00:44:27 Solvable Problems vs Non-Solvable Problems
00:48:12 What Is Meant By The Woke Right?
01:11:07 They Target Jews And Women
01:20:27 What's The Thing We're Not Talking About That We Should Be?

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Scientific American Goes Woke + Laura Helmuth's Resignation. By Michael Shermer:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=l471fRbAbcs

Laura Helmuth thought she was working at ministry of truth magazine.

"An Unscientific American" discusses the resignation of Laura Helmuth from her position as editor-in-chief at Scientific American. The author, Michael Shermer, argues that her departure exemplifies the risks of blending facts with ideology in scientific communication.

Helmuth faced backlash after posting controversial remarks on social media regarding political views, which led to public criticism and her eventual resignation. Shermer reflects on how the magazine's editorial direction has shifted towards progressive ideology, suggesting this has compromised its scientific integrity. He notes that had Helmuth made disparaging comments about liberal viewpoints, her outcome would likely have been more severe.

The article critiques Scientific American for endorsing positions on gender and race that Shermer sees as ideologically driven rather than based on scientific evidence. He expresses concern that such ideological capture within scientific publications can distort facts and undermine credibility.

• For more details, you can read the full article here.

@markcarew6724 quote: "I was a subscriber to "Scientific American" for 41 years, up until 2021. I canceled my subscription after the magazine became nothing more than a propaganda rag for the radical left. The final straw came when a regular columnist stated that "There needs to be fewer white males reading Scientific American." I followed the columnist's suggestion.

@harrymills2770 quote: "Neil deGrasse Tyson said "They fired her, didn't they?" Bill Maher said "But they published this crap!" which is the most important thing. The fact that such a person could rise to editor-in-chief of Scientific American says it's not worth the paper it's printed on.

@iyziejane quote: "We're decades into the problem of giving PhDs to people who do not deserve them. Almost all PhDs now are just normal average people who don't have the slightest inkling of what it means to be a doctor of philosophy.

@AlmostEthical quote: "I once made a quiet point on a podcasting professor that universities were increasingly prescriptive in telling students what they should think. I was met with a stream of insults and foul-mouthed invective. It's odd how many intellectuals(?) think that abusing those they disagree with is appropriate or helpful, as opposed to arguing lucidly.

@BOPBOY60 quote: "Her " scientific " acumen will be most welcomed at The View

@jameslasso1690 quote: "Similar to Mao’s cultural revolution in which history and culture were destroyed then replaced with Mao thought, today cultural woke warriors try to replace historical scientific and cultural knowledge with woke new thought. They seek to destroy the old and historical but if unable they will carry out subterfuge - if not that then cancel, if not that - ignore.

@davereesor4116 quote: "I canceled the magazine 10 years ago because of its incessant promotion of the climate alarmism industry.

@lostarrow861 quote: "New Scientist mag went the same way and National Geographic has become plain nauseating with wokery.

@saar2411 quote: "It used to be Scientific and American. It no longer is both.

@Carvin0 quote: "The rot at "Scientific American" started with John Rennie (editor) in the early 2000's when he trashed Bjorn Lomborg's book, "Skeptical Environmentalist". Rennie was the first at "Scientific American" of a breed of "science writers" who don't actually "do" science, but have the intellectual arrogance to "interpret" science for the scientifically benighted. Before Rennie, most articles were written by real scientists who actually did the "science", and used SA to explain their work to the wider public. I still treasure my collection of "Scientific American" from '71 to 2000 or so. But Rennie ended SA for me, and it has been worthless ever since. The latest kerfuffle is just a continuation of more than 20-years of "Scientific American" circling the drain.

@pelegst quote: "I've been a reader for about 60 years. When I was a child, I remember being challenged by the rigorous scientific content of the articles. They were often written by the scientists themselves and even showed the math related to the subject. This is no longer the case. I was not only inspired to become a scientist by the magazine but I also learned a tremendous amount of good science over the years. Lately, most of the articles are written by journalists, have little depth, and are formulaic. There is little, if anything, to inspire or to learn anymore. Sadly, I have recently bid farewell to a lifelong friend and let my subscription lapse.

--o-O-o--

"those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities"

• Voltaire

--o-O-o--

After my first UFO encounter in 1990 as a Security Officer in Amsterdam I was going to many different bookshops including "The American Book Center" searching for Magazine discussing UFOs and most of the time I felt guided (intuitively) ... and there it was between 1991 & 1998 I have red many UFO articles & Columns in "Scientific American" that were skeptical but in an open & honest way in the early & mid 1990s ... they were not afraid to ask the hard questions even allow to admit there might be a UFO Cover Up going on for decades. I remember they also discussed: "Citizens Against UFO Secrecy" headed by Peter Gersten, director of C.A.U.S., is a criminal defense attorney who in 1977 brought suit against the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) using F.O.I.A. successfully. As a result, over nine hundred declassified UFO documents were provided by the CIA in 1979. One year later Peter Gersten brought a suit against the US National Security Agency (NSA) through C.A.U.S.. On November 18, 1980, in response to an NSA affidavit,[2] the judge denied release of the documents.[3][4]

• So that is my past connection with "Scientific American" magazine!

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

[Tintin]

J.K Rowling eviscerates a recent 'mealy-mouthed' New York Times piece, and in her usual very eloquent way.

Go J.K

---

The rewriting of history begins.

Opponents of gender ideology haven't merely 'endured unsparing criticism'. I haven't simply been told I 'betrayed real feminism' or received a few book-burning videos.

I've been sent thousands of threats of murder, rape and violence. A trans woman posted my family's home address with a bomb-making guide. My eldest child was targeted by a prominent trans activist who attempted to doxx her and ended up doxxing the wrong young woman. I could write a twenty thousand word essay on what the consequences have been to me and my family, and what we've endured is NOTHING compared to the harm done to others.

By standing up to a movement that relies on threats of violence, ostracisation and guilt-by-association, all of us have been smeared and defamed, but many have lost their livelihoods. Some have been physically assaulted by trans activists. Female politicians have been forced to hire personal security on the advice of police. The news that one of the UK's leading endocrinologists, Dr Hillary Cass, was advised not to travel by public transport for her own safety should shame everyone who let this insanity run amok.

Lest we forget, gender apostates have been targeted for crimes such as doubting the evidential basis for transitioning children, for arguing for fair sport for women and girls, for wanting to retain single sex spaces and services, especially for the most vulnerable, and for thinking it barbaric to lock in female prisoners with convicted male sex offenders.

Now the political landscape has shifted, and some who've been riding high on their own supply are waking up with a hell of a hangover. They've started wondering whether calling left-wing feminists who wanted all-female rape centres 'Nazis' was such a smart strategy. Maybe parents arguing that boys ought not to be robbing their daughters of sporting opportunities might, sort of, have a point? Possibly letting any man who says 'I'm a woman' into the locker room with twelve-year-old girls could have a downside, after all?

Mealy-mouthed retconning of what has actually happened over the past ten years is predictable but will not stand. I don't doubt those who've turned a blind eye to the purges of non-believers, or even applauded and encouraged them, would rather minimise what the true cost of speaking out was, but 'yes, maybe trans activists went a little over the top at times' takes are frankly insulting. A full reckoning on the effects of gender ideology on individuals, society and politics is still a long way off, but I know this: the receipts will make very ugly reading when that time comes, and there are far too many of them to sweep politely under the carpet.

---

The piece being dismantled here is this:

[ExomatrixTV]

• John Oliver's Lies are Finally EXPOSED by a 14 Year Old Girl:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Gj8LTs-tUSI

“It’s not happening”
“It’s not happening that much”
“It’s a good thing that it’s happening”

[ExomatrixTV]

• Jordan Peterson's First Televised Debate Woke up the World:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oo5nITQRVrU

Before Jordan Peterson was "famous," he appeared on television to debate his colleague at the college. This is classic Jordan Peterson. The spark that lit the fire that still burns today.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Woke David Pakman vs Lex Fridman:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lRorZXSDxmk

Lex Fridman methodically dismantles David Pakman’s arguments, leaving him with no response. The intense debate between Lex Fridman and David Pakman highlights the sharp contrast in logic, with Lex Fridman delivering a masterclass in reasoning. Fans are calling it one of Lex Fridman’s most decisive wins, as he exposes David Pakman’s flawed takes point by point. The viral clip of Lex Fridman destroying woke David Pakman is being shared widely, with viewers praising Lex Fridman’s calm but devastating approach. David Pakman faces total destruction as Lex Fridman dominates the debate with brutal precision. The clash between Lex Fridman and woke David Pakman has become a major talking point, with fans replaying every moment of Lex Fridman’s takedown. Viewers are calling it a wake-up call for David Pakman as Lex Fridman exposes the weaknesses in his arguments. This viral moment has sparked intense online discussion, with Lex Fridman being hailed as a master debater. Watch how Lex Fridman destroys woke David Pakman in this unforgettable showdown.

[Vicus]

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[rgray222]

Wokeness and DEI was always meant to highlight our differences which only served to divide people and take us backward not forward.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Bill Maher vs Woke Whoopi Goldberg, and She's SHOCKED!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rjq79lZVI5Y

Bill Maher’s latest takedown on The View is sending shockwaves through woke Hollywood. This time, his target was none other than Whoopi Goldberg, who stepped into the spotlight armed with tired arguments and the usual woke playbook. But Maher, calm and collected as ever, didn’t just respond—he tore apart her claims with surgical precision, leaving Goldberg visibly stunned and the audience struggling to contain their reactions. In this video, we break down Maher’s masterclass in exposing hypocrisy. From Goldberg’s attempts to pivot the conversation to Maher’s brilliant rebuttals that left her arguments in shambles, this clash is a wake-up call for the woke mob. And if Sunny Hostin’s failed effort to take on Maher was any indication, Goldberg’s attempt only solidified how disconnected The View and woke Hollywood have become.

[Michi]

That's a strange video collection of snippets and statements. I was expecting an actual talk between Bill Maher and Whoopi Goldberg - actually matching the click-bait title ...

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

Wokeness Is Dying

00:00 - 00:33 Opening
01:59 - 15:55 Wokeness Is Dying
17:11 - 26:55 Gavin Newsom Continues To Make A Disaster Out Of California
26:56 - 37:27 College Students Set Up TikTok-Inspired Trap, Falsely Accuse Man Of Being A Predator
37:28 - 42:45 Chicago Mayor Is Asked Why His Constituents Hate Him So Much
44:00 - 50:22 The Comments Section
51:01 - 1:02:25 The Woman Who Made This TikTok Video Is NOT Canceled

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Woke Bishop Drives National Prayer Service Off the Rails in Bizarre Stunt:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NaIlNOnIMWc

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Woke Bishop Drives National Prayer Service Off the Rails in Bizarre Stunt:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NaIlNOnIMWc

Trump has responded.

But - my God, look at her eyes and tell me they do not disturb you!

Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok
Trump SHREDS leftist activist bishop who lectured him on trans propaganda and border security
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1881954312471101485

[ExomatrixTV]

• Day 1 of Trump's Presidency: the Woke Reaction ...
  

[ExomatrixTV]

source