Black Triangles: the TR-3B

[ExomatrixTV]

• Secret.Space.UFOs.Rise.of.the.Tr3b.2021.720p

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bcLBpZTk2xI

• You Can Now Fly The USAF Ultra Top Secret TR-3B!
• TR3BUFO.ZIP file needed for Flight Simulator already shared here!

[amor]

I thought I had already posted my adventure with the TR3B seen from the bottom of my driveway as I put out the garbage pickup for the next morning. At first, I thought it was a bright star as the sky was overcast. Taking a more careful look, I clearly spotted the Triangle lightings. Sometime before that, I had spotted the triangle moving slowly Eastward away from our neighborhood which is fairly large.

The question arose in my mind, why is it right over the end of my driveway? Recently, a close relative of mine died by smoking himself to death. His son sent me a good secondhand car from across the country. On awakening one morning, I heard a nice matter-of-fact young male voice say, voice-to-skull technology, the car would cost me $2100 by the time I finished doing things to get it on the road. I was surprised, but realized what was happening immediately as I was worried about my monthly budget with this new expense; however, having received this type of transmission in the past, I put two and two together, realizing that thought-reading has been a DARPA technology at least since the 1950's. There may be military installations around here to explain why it is overhead, but it is not the first communication of its kind I have had.

In addition to the above, shortly after my relative died, while I was at the computer, I received a vision in my mind which was suspended in mid-air, of my relative sitting at a table and looking in my direction. He was wearing a collar and tie topped by a navy- blue suit jacket and was looking in my direction and looking about 20 years old. In life, he was dressed like a slob and looked older. I have to check to discover whether he was buried in a navy-blue suit. My immediate thought was, he has come to tell me that he is still alive, on the other side, and was doing so through TV technology which they had there. Very nice of him and encouraging to his family when I share it with them. Anyone monitoring my thought life from above is in for a harrowing time. Vengeance is mine is a humorous thought.

[ExomatrixTV]

• For the record: "Man made UFOs" do not exist ... Why?

... because (secret or advanced) man made technology posing and/or perceived as a "assumed UFO(s)" do exist ... The problem is: that ANYTHING that is a legit "UFO" can only have that label AFTER ruling out all earthly known anomalies being debunked or explained, thus you have to EARN the label: "U.F.O." after the thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations.

• A "UFO Report" (Reporting UFO) is not the same as being a Real UFO after the "reporting" of it is investigated and checked on multiple levels.

Reporting a (possible) crime by ANYONE is not the same as knowing a real crime-evidence AFTER it is verified/checked by honest (not corrupt) qualified investigators ... similar logic ... and I can give you much more examples how language is used/misused to frame things in a certain way jumping to conclusions without having real merit.

• This issue is as old as mainstream media exists, and they deliberately want to keep you and the masses dumb about it ... also known as: "perception wars" controlling and pushing the tunnel-vision narratives.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

UFO investigator since 1990 (33 years) gave among others 80+ UFO Lectures in 5 countries, co-organizer of the 1st Big International UFO Conference in Amsterdam November 20th, 1992 (sold out!) was also speaker at that conference. Written many UFO articles between 2000 & 2009 - Interviewed many top UFO researchers/authors live on my "Untold Mysteries" & "Exposure" Radio Shows between 1991 & 2009 - Been 22+ times on Dutch 🇳🇱 National TV discussing UFO research. I was also one of the first Dutch "UFO Hotline" receiving many national UFO reports (phone calls) between 1992 and 1996.

[RMF808]

Posted by amor (here)
I thought I had already posted my adventure with the TR3B seen from the bottom of my driveway as I put out the garbage pickup for the next morning. At first, I thought it was a bright star as the sky was overcast. Taking a more careful look, I clearly spotted the Triangle lightings. Sometime before that, I had spotted the triangle moving slowly Eastward away from our neighborhood which is fairly large.

The question arose in my mind, why is it right over the end of my driveway? Recently, a close relative of mine died by smoking himself to death. His son sent me a good secondhand car from across the country. On awakening one morning, I heard a nice matter-of-fact young male voice say, voice-to-skull technology, the car would cost me $2100 by the time I finished doing things to get it on the road. I was surprised, but realized what was happening immediately as I was worried about my monthly budget with this new expense; however, having received this type of transmission in the past, I put two and two together, realizing that thought-reading has been a DARPA technology at least since the 1950's. There may be military installations around here to explain why it is overhead, but it is not the first communication of its kind I have had.

In addition to the above, shortly after my relative died, while I was at the computer, I received a vision in my mind which was suspended in mid-air, of my relative sitting at a table and looking in my direction. He was wearing a collar and tie topped by a navy- blue suit jacket and was looking in my direction and looking about 20 years old. In life, he was dressed like a slob and looked older. I have to check to discover whether he was buried in a navy-blue suit. My immediate thought was, he has come to tell me that he is still alive, on the other side, and was doing so through TV technology which they had there. Very nice of him and encouraging to his family when I share it with them. Anyone monitoring my thought life from above is in for a harrowing time. Vengeance is mine is a humorous thought.

That is some heavy stuff! Thanks for sharing

[Pris]

.

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• For the record: "Man made UFOs" do not exist ... Why?

... because (secret or advanced) man made technology posing and/or perceived as a "assumed UFO(s)" do exist ... The problem is: that ANYTHING that is a legit "UFO" can only have that label AFTER ruling out all earthly known anomalies being debunked or explained, thus you have to EARN the label: "U.F.O." after the thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations.

Oh, really? And, we're not allowed to question your so-called "thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations"? All man-made and/or earthly known anomalies as possibilities are "officially" ruled out? Who, exactly, decides that? No room for doubt afterwards? Now, that's funny, John.

[Denise/Dizi]

There is another version of the TR3B as well.. (Probably many actually), but the one I am referring to in the post, is smaller.. And shaped like a flat rectangle. It has the same sides that resemble a harmonica when you see them, and it rotates (Rather quickly too!) as it propels itself...

After "Throwing it out there"... (The information for having seen one of these things)... Hoping someone "In the know" would bite on the topic, and talk about it? All that was ever said was... "There was regret making that thing"...

I can only assume, that due to its nature, (zipping over battlefields at head level...For recon purposes) That there have been some recovered, and more than likely being recreated by forces that they would not want to "Have that technology"... I was never given a name for the drone, but I have seen one... I have also seen a rotating ball which has a pole hanging from the bottom, and possibly one out to the side (It was dark, but it looked like it had a side arm as well)... and the ball spins... I am assuming the poles off of it, keep it orientated.. I had to ask my aunt if she was seeing what I was seeing, when I saw THAT one, as it blew my mind... We were camping at a local lake, and I was surprised to find this thing just hanging in thin air above us... She saw it too... I wasn't imagining it...

I would LOVE to take a tour and see everything that has been built as a result of the reverse engineering of the craft they dug up and were "Gifted"...

It wasn't light outside, so we could just see the ball, and red lights on the poles attached to it... But I couldn't draw it if I had to, as I couldn't make out any other details in the dark... Had I not see the red light, I never would have noticed it...

The skies are FULL of different drones, craft, and technologies that we could barely imagine these days..

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Pris (here)
.

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• For the record: "Man made UFOs" do not exist ... Why?

... because (secret or advanced) man made technology posing and/or perceived as a "assumed UFO(s)" do exist ... The problem is: that ANYTHING that is a legit "UFO" can only have that label AFTER ruling out all earthly known anomalies being debunked or explained, thus you have to EARN the label: "U.F.O." after the thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations.

Oh, really? And, we're not allowed to question your so-called "thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations"? All man-made and/or earthly known anomalies as possibilities are "officially" ruled out? Who, exactly, decides that? No room for doubt afterwards? Now, that's funny, John.

I was speaking if it is all done without corrupted individuals without deceptive tactics without pushing political agenda's etc. etc. then we STILL are allowed to question anyone but the word UFO means "unidentified" and REPORTING an "unidentified" is NOT the same as a real unidentified from a holistic approach ... Not from people who jump to conclusions superfast as it FITS a certain agenda or limited point of view like: beliefs, opinions, estimations, guessing etc. etc.

Only a small percentage of the reports are considered genuine UFOs and in due time ... part of them are losing the label "UFO" too AFTER new insights new data new information comes to surface ... this has always been the case ... But the mass brainwashing media LOVES to use the term "UFO" without real proper research and laugh about it later when it is debunked over and over again ... statements like: "UFO turns out to be Venus" or "UFO turns out to be Weather Balloon" deliberately not using the word "A report turns out to be: not a UFO" >>> the FRAMING of the term is why most people do not care about (real) UFOs anymore ... The PSYOP worked! ... That is why I say what I just explained!

• The "U" stands not only for "unidentified" but also "unexplained" .... the moment it is identified or explained in an honest way that is 100% legit it loses the "U" in the word U.F.O.

Imagine if all the mass media decided to FOCUS only on the genuine, solid UFO cases AFTER those cases EARNED that label ... You would have a complete different society based up on wanting to find out what they are, and a global quest for the truth will show us much more interesting revelations than focussing on shïtty reports that will be debunked most of the time later on!

• Sure, not all "debunking" are correct as they are done by dishonest people! ... I call them "pseudo skeptics" so OF COURSE we are always allowed to question everything all the time and for good reasons! ... That will never stop!

Pseudoskepticism and bad reports of allegedly "UFOs" work hand in hand, both serving the PsyOp even if they do not realize it.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[RMF808]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by Pris (here)
.

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• For the record: "Man made UFOs" do not exist ... Why?

... because (secret or advanced) man made technology posing and/or perceived as a "assumed UFO(s)" do exist ... The problem is: that ANYTHING that is a legit "UFO" can only have that label AFTER ruling out all earthly known anomalies being debunked or explained, thus you have to EARN the label: "U.F.O." after the thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations.

Oh, really? And, we're not allowed to question your so-called "thorough honest unbiased qualified investigations"? All man-made and/or earthly known anomalies as possibilities are "officially" ruled out? Who, exactly, decides that? No room for doubt afterwards? Now, that's funny, John.

I was speaking if it is all done without corrupted individuals without deceptive tactics without pushing political agenda's etc. etc. then we STILL are allowed to question anyone but the word UFO means "unidentified" and REPORTING an "unidentified" is NOT the same as a real unidentified from a holistic approach ... Not from people who jump to conclusions superfast as it FITS a certain agenda or limited point of view like: beliefs, opinions, estimations, guessing etc. etc.

Only a small percentage of the reports are considered genuine UFOs and in due time ... part of them are losing the label "UFO" too AFTER new insights new data new information comes to surface ... this has always been the case ... But the mass brainwashing media LOVES to use the term "UFO" without real proper research and laugh about it later when it is debunked over and over again ... statements like: "UFO turns out to be Venus" or "UFO turns out to be Weather Balloon" deliberately not using the word "A report turns out to be: not a UFO" >>> the FRAMING of the term is why most people do not care about (real) UFOs anymore ... The PSYOP worked! ... That is why I say what I just explained!

• The "U" stands not only for "unidentified" but also "unexplained" .... the moment it is identified or explained in an honest way that is 100% legit it loses the "U" in the word U.F.O.

Imagine if all the mass media decided to FOCUS only on the genuine, solid UFO cases AFTER those cases EARNED that label ... You would have a complete different society based up on wanting to find out what they are, and a global quest for the truth will show us much more interesting revelations than focussing on shïtty reports that will be debunked most of the time later on!

• Sure, not all "debunking" are correct as they are done by dishonest people! ... I call them "pseudo skeptics" so OF COURSE we are always allowed to question everything all the time and for good reasons! ... That will never stop!

Pseudoskepticism and bad reports of allegedly "UFOs" work hand in hand, both serving the PsyOp even if they do not realize it.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Mahalo (thank you) for the clarification John. I feel as if Project Avalon is a very accepting place overall but we as humans often get stuck on words. We are all climbing the same mountain using different paths. Speaking our truth means that we speak of our path which nobody else has taken. I honor your path but I also honor those to disagree. Though, they are regularly in a place where they can’t understand that you have not taken their path. I understand it but try not to use that perspective anymore.

Disagreement or discord just allows us to further explain our paths.

We are all just walking each other home.

[Pris]

.

Posted by RMF808 (here)
Mahalo (thank you) for the clarification John. I feel as if Project Avalon is a very accepting place overall but we as humans often get stuck on words. We are all climbing the same mountain using different paths. Speaking our truth means that we speak of our path which nobody else has taken. I honor your path but I also honor those to disagree. Though, they are regularly in a place where they can’t understand that you have not taken their path. I understand it but try not to use that perspective anymore.

Disagreement or discord just allows us to further explain our paths.

We are all just walking each other home.

Thought I'd respond to this. You're right, we humans often do get stuck on words and you make an interesting point. At the same time, I've noticed that the older I get, the more... careful I am with words. Spellings, for example, are spells after all. And, having good communication skills can take decades... it's so complex. Take the word "understand". I'll gladly stand with someone, but never under them lol!

Back to the TR-3B... The one I saw with my partner back in 2005 (very likely a TR-3B), at the time, we definitely thought it was man-made but we also considered it to be reverse-engineered from, possibly, ET technology. There's a reason for that. Our culture has inundated us with movies and TV shows about ETs and UFOs. That was when we were still quite influenced from years of watching shows like The X-Files. We didn't know what predictive programming was yet. And, we didn't know how easily that can skew one's interpretation of reality -- especially when you're exposed to the programming for decades -- into some kind of perceived hyperreality. 5th generation warfare [enter Hollywood and Hollywood magic] can and has been used against the population to psychologically steer them down a certain path. If you've got half the population believing in "aliens", it's quite easy to fake an alien invasion, for example, to scare the population. A scared population is so easy to conquer... It's very difficult to think rationally when a person is frightened (that's why the "man-made climate change" hoax works so well). Keep the population in constant fear (and social guilt)... that's been the globalists M O.

Back to my point about the TR-3B. These days, my partner and I think the technology is likely entirely man-made (including all "advanced technologies" and black ops, whatever they may be [the "alien" angle being the coverup] and since that explains it all rather simply, we go with that until proven otherwise.

[Valknut3301]

Last fall I saw what was possibly the TR-B3, or some variant, flying out of Beale Air Force base in California on three different occasions, each time with a military escort. They were flying fairly low, slow and towards the east north-east. Each sighting was around the same time, between eight and nine pm.

I thought it was very strange, given the time and clear visibility of the craft. They were right out in the open, and the triangular formation of unblinking, orange lights were unlike any aircraft, civilian or military, I've ever seen. It definitely didn't conform to regulations.

I reported my sightings to NUFORC, but they never contacted me or followed up. You'd think they would be interested in back engineered U.F.O tech flying out of an active air force base on a regular basis. Go figure.

[Pris]

Posted by Valknut3301 (here)
Last fall I saw what was possibly the TR-B3, or some variant, flying out of Beale Air Force base in California on three different occasions, each time with a military escort. They were flying fairly low, slow and towards the east north-east. Each sighting was around the same time, between eight and nine pm.

I thought it was very strange, given the time and clear visibility of the craft. They were right out in the open, and the triangular formation of unblinking, orange lights were unlike any aircraft, civilian or military, I've ever seen. It definitely didn't conform to regulations.

I reported my sightings to NUFORC, but they never contacted me or followed up. You'd think they would be interested in back engineered U.F.O tech flying out of an active air force base on a regular basis. Go figure.

Interesting! But, how do you know it was back engineered? Back engineered from what?

[Vicus]

[Bill Ryan]

In this new video, Michael Schratt continues his in-depth report about Edgar Fouché and the TR-3B. (This is Part 2. Part 1 is here.)

From 41:50—1:01:06 Michael shows on screen and reads out a whole series of written questions that he posed to Fouché, together with Fouché's answers. This was all so detailed and interesting that I OCRed the entire thing and the whole correspondence is reproduced below in full.

~~~

TR-3B Questions for Edgar Fouché

1. Who is the primary contractor for the TR-3B?
Lockheed, Boeing, Northrup, Teledyne Ryan, managed by NRO, NSA, and CIA.
There were a number of major defense contractors involved to keep different parts of the R&D compartmentalized.

2. What company was responsible for building the propulsion system (MFD) on the TR-3B?
(not answered)

3. What was the date of the first flight of the prototype of the TR-3B?
They built a lot of DIFFERENT prototypes from the early 70s on. I believe the first gravity warping vehicle, i.e. Triangle was flown in the early 70s.

4. How many different sizes of the TR-3B were built?
Approximately 250 feet (prototype) and three were flying before 1994. The operational model was supposed to be 600 feet. Never saw a large production model. Only saw them over Edwards AFB - AFFTC, and Nevada.

5. What military facility are these craft be kept?
Other than Groom, it's probably kept under water, or in the Antarctic. Don’t know.

6. What is the overall mission of the TR-3B?
Logistics support and transportation for the secret space command. If used on a planet, moon, or large outpost, you would have a ready-made transportable space station.

7. Does the TR-3B carry any weapons system on-board?
I have no knowledge of its weapons systems. But the three letter agencies and the military love adding weapons.

8. How many crew-members are on-board during a typical mission?
I believe it was a minimum of four for the prototype.

9. Please explain how the Magnetic Field Disrupter works?
See below.

10. How is the craft capable of making 40G turns, and abrupt stops?
Ask Warren.

11. What type pilots fly the TR-3B? (Air Force or contractor)
Both, but the military pilots are Navy and USAF and graduates of their own Test Pilot School, like at AFFTC - Edwards AFB.
Many astronauts were the top test pilots in our military. The top 1% for sure.

12. What type of navigation system is used on the TR-3B?
Advanced in atmosphere nav systems, celestial & star system navigation systems, C3 systems.
Of course it would have double or triple communications, navigation, IR, ILS/Tacan, radar, and (ECM) Electronics Communications Measures, and ECCM systems.

13. What type of flight control system is used on the TR-3B?
Variable vectored intake and thrusters on the edges, and advanced multimode propulsion engines on each tip of the triangle.

14. What is the power source of the craft?
Two nuclear reactors.

15. What materials are used to build the TR-3B?
Advanced composites, metamaterials, and titanium.

16. How may total TR-3Bs were built?
Prototype, at least 3. Don't know about the Operational model or the many variations that have come since.

17.Was the TR-3B the same craft that was seen over Belgium in 1989, and Southern Illinois in 2000?
I believe it was the final prototype, or perhaps and earlier R&D - FOT&E model.

18. What is the total cost per each TR-3B?
In 1990 dollars it was about 1 Billion dollars.
I assume the operational model would be three or four times that.

19. Does the TR-3B have a payload bay?
Never noticed one. But obviously they have to have different egress and ingress points.

20. Has the TR-3B been flown outside of our solar system?
Wouldn't even venture a guess. Why not?

21. How is the TR-3B capable of exceeding the speed of sound without causing a sonic boom?
I believe it's the ionic electrical discharge and warping of gravity that allows that.

22. Please describe what the early prototype looked like when you first saw it in a military hangar? What was the date when you first saw the TR-3B?
1975 high in the atmosphere at night at Edwards AFB.
1976 within the southern part of the Nellis Range.
Late 70s at Groom AB.
The schematic you have and my 3d triangle drawings are fairly accurate.
I was told that the operational model had different engines on the tips, that they had eliminated the rotatable crew compartment.

23. What is the exterior color of the craft?
It has a stealth electro chromatic coating that can change its color and electronic signature.

24. Please describe the landing gear on the TR-3B?
The only one I saw on the ground used 3 tripods with T pads.
No wheels.

25. What government agency is responsible for operating the TR-3B?
NRO, NSA, CIA.

26. Was Kelly Johnson the Sr. Project design for the TR-3B?
No, it would have been Ben Rich.

27. Does the TR-3B emit any low frequency electrical “humming” noises during operation?
When we were bike riding in the high desert of the Nellis range, it made a very slight magnetic hum. It also made the hair on our bodies stand up.
It was right over our heads, and was pretty much silent.

28. Are there any lights on the TR-3B?
Yes, each tip of the Triangle. The MFD on the prototype gave out a large diffused light in the bottom center of it.

29. Please describe how the multi-mode rockets operates, and who the prime contractor was for the three rockets on the bottom of the craft?
See below.

30. Does the craft incorporate any type of “visual stealth” technology which wide hide it from view?
Most likely since the electro chromatic coating can change color.
Of course, we have developed several types of Invisibility tech since the Operational model.
The one was saw high up in the atmosphere after dark got bigger and bigger as it descended. Also, the stars were blocked out above the triangle.


How does the Magnetic Field Disruptor Work?

Sandia and Livermore laboratories developed the reverse engineered MFD technology. The government will go to any lengths to protect this technology. The plasma, mercury based, is pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting gravity disruption. The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89 percent. Do not misunderstand. This is not antigravity. Anti-gravity provides a repulsive force that can be used for propulsion. The MFD creates a disruption of the Earth’s gravitational field upon the mass within the circular accelerator. The mass of the circular accelerator and all mass within the accelerator, such as the crew capsule, avionics, MFD systems, fuels, crew environmental systems, and the nuclear reactor, are reduced by 89%. This causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely light and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet constructed — except, of course, those UFOs we did not build.


The Propulsion System

The TR-38s propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above 120,000 feet — then God knows how fast it can go! The 3 multimode rocket engines mounted under each comer of the craft use hydrogen or methane and oxygen as a propellant. In a liquid oxygen/hydrogen rocket system, 85% of the propellant mass is oxygen. The nuclear thermal rocket engine uses a hydrogen propellant, augmented with oxygen for additional thrust. The reactor heats the liquid hydrogen and injects liquid oxygen in the supersonic nozzle, so that the hydrogen bums concurrently in the liquid oxygen afterburner. The multimode propulsion system can; operate in the atmosphere, with thrust provided by the nuclear reactor, in the upper atmosphere, with hydrogen propulsion, and in orbit, with the combined hydrogen/oxygen propulsion.


Additional comments by Edgar Fouché

"All those people speculating about how this is “impossible” because of the use of nuclear power are missing the claim that nuclear power is not used for thrust, but for modifying the “mass” of the vehicle, that is assuming the claim is true. So the nuclear power source is only used to supply electricity, by a turbine or thermionic generation, or both, which is then used to electrically accelerate a plasma to relativistic speeds. In principle everything suggested is plausible, although no known materials would allow actually building a torroidal enclosure strong enough to withstand the forces involved before breaking apart... notice I said “Known” materials. Who knows what secret/classified materials may exist, and what other missing pieces of the puzzle there could be.”


This covers the period while I was stationed at Nellis AFB from 1976 until late 1979.

In August of 1979 I was still on temporary duty (TDY) under orders from Detachment 3 of Edwards AFB. This was pretty much the whole summer.

The assignment location was Groom AB, part of Area 51. TDY personnel didn't have the privileges of Permanent Party assigned personnel.

I was always under observation and/or under guard. Even when I had to use the latrine. And there were NO doors on the toilets.

I worked on several systems related to satellite communications and crypto during that summer.

This is detailed during my presentation to the IUFOC in 1998 when I first disclosed publicly about my 20+ year career in the USAF.

I always went up on a darkened out Blue USAF Bus from Nellis AFB in the early morning and came back in the late evening or after dark.

In addition to working at Groom AB that summer I was also at a facility that was called Defense Advanced Research Center (DARC) which was an underground facility. It is more classified than Groom Air Base.

It was either southeast or south of Groom AB and it WAS NOT Papoose dry lake bed. Which has, by the way, never had any facilities on it, parking lots, lights, etc., as described by Lazar. The real S-4 is part of the Tonopah facilities.

One evening as it was getting dark I was at the Engineering, Test, Avionics building which I believe was called Building 9. However, as we came out the back side of the building our Bus was waiting outside for us.

The TDY personnel had to wear darkened out black goggles so we wouldn't see things we weren't supposed to. I had a habit of slightly pulling my goggles down a bit so I could peer out and see above the goggles.

On this specific occasion, as I was walking towards the bus, I noticed off in the distance a very large (200 to 250 feet) Triangular vehicle and was startled.

It appeared to be a dark gray with a copper like haze that caused it to shimmer a little bit. At the angle I viewed it, I'm 100 percent positive it was a perfect triangle with rounded corners, much like a Vick’s cough drop.

It did not have landing gear/wheels. It was a tripod - T pad type support.

I could see about 2/3rds of the triangle vehicle. It wasn't until several years I found out a lot more details of what was then designated the TR-3B Astra. There were NO markings that ! could see, or vertical or horizontal stabilizers.

I glimpsed it for just a very few seconds. I was absolutely stunned by what I saw. And I had seen a lot of things in my career and two tours of Vietnam.

For a long while I thought the TR stood for Tactical Reconnaissance as is the common designation used by the USAF. I'm of the opinion that the TR stood for Teledyne Ryan. The TR-3B was NOT a second version of the TR-3A, or the TIER series of aircraft.

The primary purpose for the TR-3B is as a Space Platform for our Top Secret Space Fleet. After Popular Science magazine's false article about the triangular blimp, which was done for disinformation, and the fact that we have many deltoid shaped aircraft flying around the world, it’s been quite confusing for people to know the truth.
Especially since the DoD spends so much money and resources on disinformation, propaganda, and psyops.

At the end of my TDY to Groom AB, I received an out of cycle Airman’s Performance Report (APR), called a form 77A I believe. It and many of my military documents and videos are on the internet.

My primary career was on Avionics, Automatic Test Equipment (Computer controlled ATE), Satellite Communications, Electronic Counter Measures (ECM), and Crypto (NSA).

I had 13 or 14 different Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSCs) during my career. I was handpicked Cadre for several versions of the F-111, the F-15, F-16, the original B-1, the A-10, the 8-52 (SAC).

I had over 4,000 hours of training in specialty schools, of which about half were Top Secret. I also had factory training at McAir, GD, Bendix, Lockheed, and a number of other DoD contractors.

On these aircraft and on the AFSCs that I had, I performed as Research and Development (R&D), Flight Operations Test & Evaluation (FOT&E), site activation, fielding of new aircraft squadrons until operational.

After completion of installation of a TS Satellite Communications Command Post for the SAC/USAF on the Canadian border at a secret dispersion base, I was assigned an office at a regional USAF depot at Kelly AFB in San Antonio, TX.

I started off as a Strategic Air Command Liaison to Industry (DoD) and it rapidly changed to DoD Liaison to the Defense Industry.

The last 15 years of my career I mostly worked directly for full Colonels and Generals. My last 7 years I worked and reported to a two-star general, who I rarely saw. We were in different states. Fun stuff...

I retired in 1987 and was hired by SAIC as a Senior Program Manager. I was 38. I also worked for CEA, PCA, SSAI, and was a consultant to several other DoD contractors.

After 1996 I had no direct employment with the DoD or the Military Defense Industry which President Eisenhower (Ike) called the ‘Military Industrial Complex’.