30 Covid Facts-Sheet - A collection of all the arguments you’ll ever need.

[palehorse]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• I wonder if anyone on the whole planet found the time to try to "debunk" this Project Avalon Forum Thread called: "30 Covid Facts-Sheet - A collection of all the arguments you’ll ever need." (60,972+ Visits).

Correcting some (possible) mistakes or misunderstandings ... has anyone tried yet? ... If so ... please show/share url of the "debunking" if any.

cheers,
John

Well done John, great compilation of excellent information, many thanks!!!

[ExomatrixTV]

• Covid Facts:

PLANNED: Thousands of physicians, scientists & lawyers worldwide have come forward with evidence that this pandemic was planned, with a criminal purpose. COVID-19 vaccines were already developed in 2019, months before the pandemic! In 2018, every country in the world suddenly began importing hundreds of millions of COVID-19 test kits.Three months before the pandemic, it was announced that a coronavirus pandemic was coming from Wuhan.Two months before the pandemic, Bill Gates organized a ‘coronavirus pandemic exercise’.

In 2018, Fauci guaranteed there would be a pandemic during the first term of the Trump administration.And there’s much more!

• See it here: StopWorldControl.com/proof

BRIBERY: Politicians receive large sums of money to enforce lockdowns. For example, the president of Belarus was offered a billion dollars, but he refused and exposed this bribery. The Nigerian government was offered $400 million to follow the agenda of Bill Gates. Italian politician Sara Cunial confronted the Italian president for accepting money from Bill Gates to lock down the country. Hospitals receive $39,000 for every patient who dies and is registered as a ‘covid death’.

Newsmedia and celebrities are paid handsomely to spread covid propaganda. And much, much more!

• See all the facts and evidence for yourself: StopWorldControl.com/full

CRIME: In every country, there are organizations with thousands of medical professionals stating that the pandemic is an organized crime. USA: America’s Frontline Doctors. Europe: Doctors for Truth (Netherlands), Doctors for Freedom (Belgium), Doctors for Enlightenment (Germany), Medical Freedom Alliance (UK), etc. Examples ofglobal groups are the World Doctors Alliance and COMUSAV, where tens of thousands of physicians, academicians, lawyers, scientists and politicians join together in the fight against this crime.

LAW: A network of 100 lawyers, led by renowned international trial lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, is currently working with 100 experts from every field of science.They have irrefutable evidence that the pandemic, lockdowns,vaccines, etc. are - in their own words - ‘the worst crimes against humanity ever committed’. They are now preparing historic lawsuits to punish all who are complicit.

• See all the evidence with your own eyes here: StopWorldControl.com/fuellmich

Covid Facts Flyer: PDF

[Sadieblue]

A nurse speaking with Sen. Johnson on the mistreatment of Covid patients in hospital.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5SVO0lc_1_o

[ExomatrixTV]

• Must watch! 👀 IMMACULATE COVID DECEPTIONS:

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• An Open Letter to: PEI Premier Dennis King & PEI CHPO Dr. Heather Morrison

Dear Premier King and Dr. Morrison:
Thank you for your service throughout the COVID 19 pandemic.

We are a group of concerned Islanders with no agenda except to make sure that we and our families remain healthy. Since so much has been learned since the outbreak in March 2020, we would appreciate responses to the following current concerns and questions: COVID Mortality, Infection Fatality and Case Fatality:

• COVID fatality rates were overestimated in the beginning of the pandemic, in part due to inaccurate modelling, and because COVID case fatality rates were being compared to the flu infection fatality rates instead of the flu case fatality rates—comparing apples to oranges. See first link below for more detail.

• Why have you not explained to Islanders the actual risks of COVID? According to June 2021 statistics, the Overall Survival Rate from COVID is 99.93%. For people under 80, the survival rate is 99.98%. For people under 70, the survival rate is 99.99%. For people under 60, the survival rate is 99.996%. For people under 40, the survival rate is 99.9994%. For those under 19, the survival rate is 99.9997%. (These numbers include people who were already at high risk of death from pre-existing conditions.)

• We would appreciate clarity in your terminology. The WHO defines a case as someone who actually has symptoms and has 2 positive PCR tests. When you reference case fatality rate and call all positive tests “cases” regardless of whether the individuals are symptomatic, then you are overstating the risk of death and unnecessarily increasing fear among the public.

• According to a paper published in the WHO bulletin, the infection fatality rate of COVID is similar to that of the flu. The world has never been shut down for the flu. In fact, there have been virtually no recorded flu deaths/cases since COVID. What happened to the flu? Why do we remain shut down?

cambridge.org/core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness/article/public-health-lessons-learned-from-biases-in-coronavirus-mortality-overestimation/7ACD87D8FD2237285EB667BB28DCC6E9
jccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Covid-Statistics-canada-june-29-2021.png
who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf

• "State of Public Health Emergency":

• Why has the Provincial Legislative Assembly continually extended the state of public-health emergency since March 16, 2020, with no transparency or public debate?
• With under 200 cases, 0 community transmission, only 2 hospitalizations, and 0 deaths on the Island, what, exactly, is the current emergency, and why, with these reassuring statistics, does the Island remain in a state of public-health emergency?
• Do we have any assurance that the Island will not be closed off from the rest of Canada again?

• Emergency Use Authorization:

• Emergency Use Authorization allows for non-FDA approved vaccines to be used only when there are no effective treatments for COVID.
• It is now widely known that there are indeed effective treatments for COVID, which significantly reduce hospitalizations and deaths, especially if used early (e.g., Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, with many peer-reviewed studies showing their effectiveness).
• How does our public-health policy justify withholding potentially life-saving treatments for both vaccinated (“breakthrough” cases among the vaccinated have now been recorded) and unvaccinated individuals, especially before having to move a patient to ventilation, which, for most, will result in death? If there is effective treatment that could prevent suffering or death, why would it be withheld?

covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7330574/?report=reader
clinicalnews.org/2021/05/07/latest-peer-reviewed-research-immediate-global-ivermectin-use-will-end-covid-19-pandemic/

• Vaccinations:

• What is your office doing to ensure informed consent, which is federal law, to every person on PEI who is offered a COVID vaccine?
• Has the general public been made aware that the COVID vaccines are approved only under Emergency Use Authorization and that these vaccines are not licensed products, still in clinical trials? Their long-term safety and effectiveness remain unknown.
• Why is PEI recommending a target of 80% population vaccination when NB and NS targets are 75%? Shouldn’t this percentage be consistent across the country or at least within the Atlantic provinces? On PEI 86% of all eligible people have received one dose, the highest rate in the country, yet why do we still require a PEI Pass for travel to the Island?
• Because vaccinated people do, in fact, experience “breakthrough” cases and because the prevention of transmission remains unproven among the vaccinated, why do you assume the vaccinated are safe to roam the country and the province, free of concern, while the unvaccinated are not?
• It is important to understand the difference between relative and absolute risks. While
the relative risk reduction was 95% and 90% for the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines,
respectively, the absolute risk reduction was only 0.7% and 1.1% for these same vaccines. As an example: In the Pfizer trial, the risk of a positive PCR test with
symptoms was 0.04% in the vaccinated arm versus 0.74% in the placebo arm. This
absolute reduction rate is not as impressive in the context of already very low rates of
risk. Why isn’t this significant distinction explained to the public?
• One of the main reasons so many people are being vaccinated is that they feel coerced by governmental policies, by societal pressures, by work environments, and even by family members. Vaccination seems to be the only way to return life to “normal”—to spend time with loved ones, to restore liberties, to travel (even to Costco), and to fit in with the rest of society. In short, many people feel they simply do not have a choice. Is that how you want Islanders to feel under your leadership, Premier King and Dr. Morrison?

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33320052/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33652582/
gis.blog.ryerson.ca/2020/12/13/understanding-risk-ordered-weighted-averaging-and-relative-vs-absolute-risk-reduction/

• PCR Testing:

• PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 has been a contentious issue among scientists since the beginning of the pandemic because its accuracy (or inaccuracy) dictates ‘case numbers,’ covid deaths and covid policies around the world. In order for a virus to cause infection, it needs to be present in high enough amounts to be able to be cultured in a lab. There is a consensus among scientists that a specimen that registers a positive result above a PCR cycle threshold of 35 is unlikely to culture a virus in a laboratory setting. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci agrees with this upper limit. Why then is the PCR cycle threshold set as high as 40 in most provinces? In Manitoba, a chief microbiologist recently testified that 56% of cases were false positives. Shouldn’t we have a national consensus on a medical test that determines if we are “sick” or not, especially if all Canadians are now traveling in and out of PEI?
• The U.S. is testing vaccinated individuals at a much lower PCR threshold than unvaccinated people.

This makes it much less likely for a vaccinated person to test positive than an unvaccinated person. Are we doing the same in PEI? Should there not be one accurate PCR threshold, which minimizes false positives yet still captures the largest number of people who have a high enough viral load to infect others?

jccf.ca/manitoba-chief-microbiologist-and-laboratory-specialist-56-of-
medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4
medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v2
directorsblog.nih.gov/2020/07/28/immune-t-cells-may-offer-lasting-protection-against-covid-19/

• Adverse Reactions/Injuries (Deaths as a "Side Effects"):

• The American Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS), the European Medicines Agency, and the Government of Canada are reporting unexpected and unacceptably high adverse effects to and deaths from COVID vaccines.

On PEI there is anecdotal evidence of pericarditis/myocarditis, menstrual bleeding irregularities, changes in breast-fed infants from vaccinated mothers, neurological impairment, seizures, blindness, strokes, and even death following vaccination.
• What is your office doing to track and treat any vaccine adverse reactions?
cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html
health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/#a6
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
openvaers.com/covid-data/covid-full-data

• Pregnancy and Children:

• The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently not recommending COVID vaccines for children. Why, then, in an unaffected place like PEI, are we not applying the precautionary principle?
• The WHO also states that risks in pregnancy are not known; however, your office does not state that fact in any public information concerning vaccines. Both Pfizer and the FDA warn that they do not know the risks to women and babies during pregnancy or lactation. Therefore, how in good conscience can you allow a local obstetrician to promote this vaccine when neither a vaccine manufacturer, Pfizer, nor the FDA has any conclusive evidence of safety? (See fda.gov document below, 11.2, page 32).
• The UK is not offering COVID vaccines to those under 18 years of age.
• Why is our province coercing vaccination for those aged 12 to 18 and therefore putting our children at risk of unknown short- and long-term side effects when young people are not significant vectors of COVID and the vast majority of them have no or minor symptoms?
fda.gov/media/144413/download

• Immunity:

• Why has there been no word from your office about how individuals can support their immune systems to combat COVID? For example, sub-optimal Vitamin D levels are correlated with COVID susceptibility, severity, and mortality; further, low levels of Vitamin D disproportionately affect people of colour. (Health PEI won’t cover the minimal cost of a Vitamin D test.) There is also evidence that Zinc can be of benefit in prevention and can serve as an adjunct for treatment.
• Other major comorbidities include obesity and metabolic syndrome. Why has your office not launched any public-awareness campaign regarding overall good health, especially when there is inadequate vaccine data for those who are immuno-compromised?
• What herd immunity, which provides robust immunity, exists from natural infection? Why are we not doing T-Cell testing to confirm previous infection?
• Can you provide peer-reviewed evidence that vaccinated immunity can improve on natural immunity?
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc8039288
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc7395818

• Face Masks:

• In the summer of 2020, when the Atlantic Bubble was in full swing, masks were not mandated, and no community transmission occurred. Why, then, did PEI mandate masks only later, in November 2020, when the Bubble was closed?
• There is a large body of evidence that suggests that masks are neither effective nor safe (reduction in the flow of oxygen, carbon dioxide toxicity, bacterial growth, psycho-social concerns, to name a few associated problems). Where is the evidence that masks work and are safe?
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2781743
nc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
sott.net/article/438827-A-classic-fallacious-argument-If-masks-dont-work-then-why-do-surgeons-wear-them
rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

• Costs:

• What effect have the cancellations and delays of other health testing and treatments had on the Island’s population over the past 18 months? How many people have suffered or died from these cancellations and delays or will suffer premature death due to delayed cancer diagnoses, for example? How can any deaths in PEI due to COVID measures be justified without a single COVID death?
• It could be argued that the real public-health emergency on PEI is the extraordinary lack of doctors, nurses, and medical services for a quickly growing population. Are resources that could be used to impact this crisis being drained by COVID measures?
• What are COVID policies doing to our economy? What are the costs of all the signage, advertising, posters, flyers, direct mail, testing, tracking, police services, additional employees, and the new bridge entry system? How many tourists are choosing not to come to PEI this summer because of all the red tape?
• In human terms, how much are these COVID measures costing Islanders, as well as and the rest of the world, in the form of stress, mental and physical wellbeing, and even addictions? What untold effects are these policies having on our children, who have lost more than a year of critical in person learning, socialization, emotional development, and a general sense of safety? Around the world, those living in extreme poverty has increased by 150 million.
bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1179
worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/10/07/covid-19-to-add-as-many-as-150-million-extreme-poor-by-2021

• "Delta Variants":

• The CHPO’s daily briefing on July 20th, 2021, referred to the “the pandemic of the unvaccinated” and warned that a fourth wave will be caused by the Delta variant in the unvaccinated. Is this a scare tactic or coercion?
• Public Health England, in a publication titled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England: Technical briefing 17,” dated June 25, 2021, states that unvaccinated people were less likely to die (38 of 117 deaths) than fully vaccinated people (50 of 117 deaths) from the Delta variant, which is alarming, given the fact that the vaccine is considered “effective.” Israel is reporting similar data.
• While vaccination may indeed help some segments of society, where is the data that supports your claim that the unvaccinated will be more likely to spread COVID or even die from it, as you caution?

• Discrimination:

• Why is PEI the only Atlantic province to have a vaccine passport? PEI already has the highest single dose vaccination rate in the country, and community transmission has never occurred.
• Why is your office creating borders within our own country when our Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees inter-provincial travel?
• Have you considered how your policies discriminate against those who cannot be vaccinated due to known allergic reactions, prior history of adverse effects to some of the known components of the COVID vaccine, or personal choice?
• Why are you recommending that those who have recovered from COVID (i.e., all COVID cases on PEI) also get vaccinated, when studies report not only robust and likely long-term immunity resulting from COVID after infection and recovery but also the likely possible increased adverse effects from the vaccine?
• Do you believe in medical freedoms and the individual’s right to make their own decisions about medical treatments?

• In Conclusion:

“I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I'm a human being, first and foremost, and as such I'm for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.”
—Malcolm X

Sincerely,
Concerned Islanders
Please email freedomforumpei@protonmail.com to respond to these questions.
If you are a member of the public and would like a digital copy of this letter, please email
freedomforumpei@protonmail.com

• source

[raregem]

This is one heck of an interview and knowledge re: CV-19 and snake venom. The first 45 minutes are informative. Haven't finished the 2 hours yet. Working on it now.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9gb4C...=subscriptions

[ExomatrixTV]

• See also Project Avalon Forum Thread: 17,000+ Physicians & Medical Scientists Declare State Of Medical Emergency Must Be Lifted!

--o-O-o--

I wonder if anyone on the whole planet found the time to try to "debunk" this Project Avalon Forum Thread called: "30 Covid Facts-Sheet - A collection of all the arguments you’ll ever need." (63,347+ Visits).

Correcting some (possible) mistakes or misunderstandings ... has anyone tried yet? ... If so ... please show/share url of the "debunking" if any.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Mass Civil Disobedience is Spreading:

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/h8hHvqWEXw7s

[ExomatrixTV]

• What, Really?!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WHa10lZch9c

• Vaccination Injuries On Record for Covid19

[ExomatrixTV]

• "Why Should Americans Believe Anything The Government Says?" - Jordan Goes Nuclear On Biden's Lies:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NqsCVoauPAo

[ExomatrixTV]

• David Icke Clip10 The Flaws With Models:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_47SV_JPDKU

[ExomatrixTV]

• 22 legit questions about the mRNA injections, you're not supposed to ask!

[Dyle Daman]

Many thanks for this John ....its brilliant.
Best wishes

[ExomatrixTV]

• Investigation REVEALS The Shocking Truth About COVID:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=999QK1NTE_E

A groundbreaking investigation into the COVID dossier reveals that the pandemic response was not led by public health officials but by global military and intelligence agencies. Investigative researchers Sasha Latypova and Debbie Lerman uncover documents proving that COVID was treated as a national security threat, not a public health crisis. Why was the military involved? Who truly controlled the response? And what does this mean for the future of global health policies, digital IDs, and government control?

• The Covid Dossier: A record of military and intelligence coordination of the global Covid event.

US, UK, Canada, Australia, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy

Sasha Latypova

Feb 04, 2025

This is a set of facts and references compiled by independent researchers Debbie Lerman and Sasha Latypova.

Editorial note - my readers know that I have been vocal about covid as military operation since early 2022. I personally arrived at the conclusion that the massive harm from the covid shots and other government “pandemic response” measures was fully intentional. For purposes of this dossier, which Debbie and I disseminated to many other journalists and independent researchers, our aim was to remove any personal opinion and leave a dry, fact-only record. The readers can draw their own conclusions from this set of facts.

Due Diligence and Art is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

We have also recorded a 38 min video where we discuss the background and our own thinking about the global military-intelligence campaign which continues to date:

Please help us share this information far and wide. Feel free to repost/use any material herein and use the reference for further investigation. We appreciate credit, but it is also not obligatory. These are the facts from publicly available documentation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Covid Dossier is a compilation of the evidence we have amassed over the last three years supporting the following claim:

"Covid was not a public health event, although it was presented as such to the world’s population. It was a global operation, coordinated through public-private intelligence and military alliances and invoking laws designed for CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear) weapons attacks".

The Dossier contains information regarding the military/intelligence coordination of the Covid biodefense response in the U.S., U.K., Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, and Italy. For some countries we have extensively documented information. For others, we have some documentation of military/intelligence involvement, but not all the details. For as many countries as possible, we list the military/intelligence agencies in charge of their country’s Covid response; dates on which emergency declarations were made in each country; military/intelligence-related agencies and bodies in charge of censorship/propaganda; and top people with military/intelligence jobs who were known or reported to hold leadership positions in the response. We also list connections to global governing bodies, including the EU and UN/WHO, through which the response was coordinated. In the final section, we provide a list of military/intelligence/biodefense alliances that provide multinational frameworks for responding to a bioterror/bioweapons attack.

By providing all of this information in one place, we hope to dispel the notion that Covid was a public health event, managed independently by each country’s public health agencies, with some limited, logistically focused military involvement. We also hope to drive home the shocking realization that not only were military and intelligence agencies in charge of Covid in all of these countries, but the response to what was represented as a public health crisis was coordinated through military alliances, including NATO.

This should be the subject of front-page news everywhere.
We are calling on investigators, whistleblowers, and anyone with information related to this topic to contact us and/or publish the information so that we can continue to construct the full picture of what happened to the world starting in early 2020 and continuing to this day.

HOW IT STARTED: FIVE YEARS AGO TODAY

Exactly five years ago, on February 4th, 2020, two things happened that almost nobody knows about, but that played an important role in the course of recent world history:

• 1) Two declarations for CBRN (weapons of mass destruction) emergencies – EUA and PREP Act – made by the U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services, were registered on this date. [ref][ref]

EUA stands for Emergency Use Authorization. Legally, EUA powers are intended for situations of grave, immediate emergencies involving weapons of mass destruction. They allow for the use of countermeasures against CBRN (chemical, biological, nuclear or radiological) agents without the regulatory oversight intended to ensure safety and efficacy, because the immediate threat of a CBRN attack is deemed so much greater than any potential risks caused by the countermeasures.[ref] The PREP Act is the legal indemnity granted to anyone involved in using an EUA countermeasure, because if a weapon of mass destruction is involved, the risk of the CBRN attack is so great that no one should face legal consequences for potential collateral damage caused by using unregulated countermeasures.

In order to activate EUA, the law requires “A determination by the Secretary of HHS that there is a public health emergency… that involves a CBRN agent or agents, or a disease or condition that may be attributable to such agent(s). [ref] So when the EUA was officially activated on February 4, 2020, it was in essence a declaration of a state of emergency involving weapon(s) of mass destruction.

• This PREP Act Public Health Emergency declaration has been repeatedly renewed and is currently in effect through December 31, 2029.

2) A pharmaceutical executive was caught on tape saying that the U.S. Department of Defense called to inform him “that the newly discovered Sars-2 virus posed a national security threat.” [ref]

It is important to note that on February 4, 2020, there were fewer than a dozen confirmed cases of the novel coronavirus disease (later called Covid-19) in the US, and zero deaths. Worldwide, the death count was fewer than 500. There was nothing about the virus, at least as it was presented publicly, that would make anyone believe it posed a threat to national security.

These two events are remarkable for several reasons:

• They indicate that the beginnings of Covid were rooted in national security machinations, not public health considerations.
• They also strongly suggest that the deployment of the EUA “medical countermeasures” under Public Health Emergency declaration was officially launched at a time when an emergency, much less a national or a global one, could not possibly be determined. No public health parameters justifying that a novel virus posed a “threat to national security” existed at the time of the EUA and PREP Act declarations.

Thus, on this day five years ago, a military CBRN countermeasure deployment campaign was officially launched against a poorly defined illness that was alleged to have killed a few hundred people worldwide.

Within six weeks of this date, in order to ensure a market for the countermeasures (among other aims), the lockdown-until-vaccine response – which is a military/counterterrorism plan and has nothing to do with public health [ref] – went into effect all over the world.

WHY THIS INFORMATION IS CRUCIAL

It is crucially important to understand that Covid was a globally coordinated response, based on legal frameworks intended for biodefense/biowarfare situations. The attack that initiated the global Covid response could have been real, perceived or invented – regardless of the trigger, the lockdown-until-vaccine paradigm originated in the military/intelligence biodefense playbook, not in any scientifically based or epidemiologically established public health plan.[ref]

This means that nothing about the response – masking, distancing, lockdowns, vaccines – was part of a public health plan to respond to a disease outbreak. Rather, every aspect of the response was intended to induce public panic in order to gain compliance with biodefense operations, culminating with the injection of unregulated mRNA products, which were legally treated as biodefense military countermeasures (MCMs), into billions of human beings.

Who ordered and directed these operations? Who benefited from them? Who was and still is covering them up? We have been investigating these questions for the last several years, and we hope many who read this will join us moving forward.

CALL TO ACTION

Most journalists in both corporate and alternative spaces are either unaware or unwilling to cover the military/intelligence/biodefense/global coordination aspects of Covid. We need to change that.

• source

[Delight]

FYI