God Save Canada

[jaybee]

Posted by BMJ (here)
Canada the Illusion

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8wHj2vucj4o

The Myth is Canada
Dec 19, 2024

A film produced by Timm Stein, in collaboration with Xander La Rue, Doug Force and The Myth Is Canada. This film is entirely based on facts and not opinions! The viewer is strongly encouraged to verify each fact. The film was first released on December 11, 2024.

This film exposes the fraud that has been committed on the people of the land mass commonly referred to as “Canada”. It highlights the historic facts and showcases in detail who committed the fraud and when it was committed. It presents hard facts that show how the illusion was implemented and how the people have been deceived, trapped and enslaved. It also presents the solution for the people to free themselves from the illusion and create a new reality.

[snipped see #219]

Thanks - the video is an interesting catalogue of historical facts - I've only watched it once but would it be fair to summarize and say that since 1931 Canada has had no legal basis as an Independent Nation...and all proclamations and laws after that year are technically null and void...?

I wonder if Trump is aware of all this and that's why he's angling for 'Canada' to become the 51st State... if there is no actual legal basis for Canada then the land mass is 'up for grabs' so to speak .... a (late) continuance of the American War of Independence could be in play -

Maybe that's why Trump made a point of calling Trudeau 'Governor' hinting that he knew the legal reality - ?

And why Mark Carney has been installed to deal with the 'situation'.... ?

[Rizotto]

BEWARE!

About "The Myth is Canada" movie above, it is part of a pattern since Trump got elected of onslaught on Canada's integrity as a country, along with the incessant threats from Trump to annex Canada and impose tariffs, as reported almost daily by the media.

There also is a relentless campaign along the same lines on Canadian social media. My hunch is that most of the social media posts that are mocking Canada and praising Trump are from AI bots. These are posts repeatedly claiming that Canada becoming the 51st state would be great, and they lavish praise on Trump. Any attempt from other posters to point out Trump's numerous flaws is answered by these 'bots' in crude and insulting ways. No intelligent debate is possible with them.

As for the above "The Myth is Canada" movie, it claims that Canada's problem is that 'communism' has taken hold of the country. This is bizarre. The Turdeau regime is a corrupt tool of the WEF, like most of the west, but not 'communist'. And what is the solution that this movie's summary claimed to offer? I didn't see it. I'd be interested to hear about it from those who watched that movie. (I only spot checked it, frankly I don't have the time to watch a series of hypnotic images with screened text overlay for an hour.)

It is curious that this movie was first released in December 2024, which is right after Trump was elected, and at the same time that Trump started to launch verbal attacks on Canada.

Also VERY curious is that many of the comments below that movie appear to be from USA citizens, calling out to their Canadian 'brothers'.

ALL of this seems too coincidental and contrived to be genuine. Most of this seems to be planned manipulation of Canadians into accepting a takeover by the Trump regime. In other words, an intense psyop has been launched on Canadians, similar to many of the 'regime change' operations the USA is infamous for, except that in this case it's about outright annexation.

My BS detector is on high alert. I hope to hear from other Canadians here.

[Bassplayer1]

Posted by Rizotto (here)
BEWARE!

About "The Myth is Canada" movie above, it is part of a pattern since Trump got elected of onslaught on Canada's integrity as a country, along with the incessant threats from Trump to annex Canada and impose tariffs, as reported almost daily by the media.

There also is a relentless campaign along the same lines on Canadian social media. My hunch is that most of the social media posts that are mocking Canada and praising Trump are from AI bots. These are posts repeatedly claiming that Canada becoming the 51st state would be great, and they lavish praise on Trump. Any attempt from other posters to point out Trump's numerous flaws is answered by these 'bots' in crude and insulting ways. No intelligent debate is possible with them.

As for the above "The Myth is Canada" movie, it claims that Canada's problem is that 'communism' has taken hold of the country. This is bizarre. The Turdeau regime is a corrupt tool of the WEF, like most of the west, but not 'communist'. And what is the solution that this movie's summary claimed to offer? I didn't see it. I'd be interested to hear about it from those who watched that movie. (I only spot checked it, frankly I don't have the time to watch a series of hypnotic images with screened text overlay for an hour.)

It is curious that this movie was first released in December 2024, which is right after Trump was elected, and at the same time that Trump started to launch verbal attacks on Canada.

Also VERY curious is that many of the comments below that movie appear to be from USA citizens, calling out to their Canadian 'brothers'.

ALL of this seems too coincidental and contrived to be genuine. Most of this seems to be planned manipulation of Canadians into accepting a takeover by the Trump regime. In other words, an intense psyop has been launched on Canadians, similar to many of the 'regime change' operations the USA is infamous for, except that in this case it's about outright annexation.

My BS detector is on high alert. I hope to hear from other Canadians here.

Hi Rizotto, your thoughts remind me of something I read on the CBC news (yes, I know its the CBC but since the whole Tariff drama, I check-in to observe what's being said by mainstream 'media.' Anyway, this article goes on to suggest that a social media propaganda campaign targeted at specific groups - especially young people who are struggling is a possibility from the U.S government to wear people down into the 51st State.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tru...nada-1.7479890

[norman]

I want to know what Canadians currently sticking up for Canada against the proposition Trump has raised see as the future for Canada.

I'm asking for any/all Canadian views and ideas but where I'm at with it in my own head at this point is a simple 2 way pair of options. Educate me if this seems naïve.

a) Canada goes it alone as an independent state after the mess of the Eurozone and the British Commonwealth floats it's value to what the market (globally) gives it.

b) Canada clings faithfully to the Crown and shares it's fate, whatever that eventually turns out to be.

oh, maybe there's a C) Carney is a heavyweight and Canada kicks Trump's ass, wipes out MAGA, finishes off the earlier Cartel/China American carcass cleaning and repurposes the 50 states within a Crown global empire.

Help me understand, on a simple mind map like mine, where Canadians' passions and fears distribute themselves.

[norman]

If anyone thinking about who Mark Carney really is hasn't found anything stinky enough to make a big noise about yet, try switching your research over to his wife for a while. Her official Wiki sparkles with interesting leads, even just as a nobody with no bloodline ID to consider yet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Fox_Carney

Net zero, Climate and Save The Children. Indoctrinated at Oxford and Pennsylvania Uni'. As classic as they come.

Mark Carney was almost a household name in England in the 90s as the governor of the Bank of England. Who gets to be the governor of the Bank of England for 7 years at the age he was then, in his 30s ?

You can bet your ass elite secret orders are involved, which probably also means 'bloodlines'.

[Flash]

Posted by norman (here)
I want to know what Canadians currently sticking up for Canada against the proposition Trump has raised see as the future for Canada.

I'm asking for any/all Canadian views and ideas but where I'm at with it in my own head at this point is a simple 2 way pair of options. Educate me if this seems naïve.

a) Canada goes it alone as an independent state after the mess of the Eurozone and the British Commonwealth floats it's value to what the market (globally) gives it.

b) Canada clings faithfully to the Crown and shares it's fate, whatever that eventually turns out to be.

oh, maybe there's a C) Carney is a heavyweight and Canada kicks Trump's ass, wipes out MAGA, finishes off the earlier Cartel/China American carcass cleaning and repurposes the 50 states within a Crown global empire.

Help me understand, on a simple mind map like mine, where Canadians' passions and fears distribute themselves.

We Canadians, cannot answer to your demand on this forum.

Why? Because this forum is Soooooo far on the right and sooooooo mentally ingrained with beliefs in Trump lies and propaganda that we would non stop try to show the fallacies and lies of Trump to not be believed, taken into account, or even be ostracised. Nobody has such time to lose with religious political fanatism.

To most of us, who believed that Biden and the democrats were a heavily corrupted dirty gang, we now seeworstwith Trump and his gang of oligarchs gangsters - exactly like Putin, same mentality, same lies, same not holding its words, same amd more corruption. (ex:Trump family is now looking at investing in Binance and of couse Trump allowing them back in USA -if this is not corruption, what is?).

You have gleefully elected a dictator with no counterbalance to ensure democracy.

Has anyone protesting Mussolini or Staline or Putin made a dent in saving their country from dictators? NO.

No Canadians, or about none if we taked exception with some Avalon Canadian members, no Europeans, no Asians like Trump and by ricochet the Americans. Americans were already hated in many places, now it has begun with their friends too.

Too many lies and deformed realities from Trump and his mafia gang to count and start arguing. When dealing with full fledge pervert narcissists one has to reject everything from them in one swing and try to stop or repair any damage they create whenever possible.

And i haven’t mentioned the spiritual swamp America is in. No way that karma will not show up. That spiritual swamp was obvious with Biden but is now in the open with Trump.

I am done here - not worth my time and energy.

Trump the loosh creator! Feed the lowest vibrations, loosh loosh loosh

[Rizotto]

Posted by norman (here)
I want to know what Canadians currently sticking up for Canada against the proposition Trump has raised see as the future for Canada.

I'm asking for any/all Canadian views and ideas but where I'm at with it in my own head at this point is a simple 2 way pair of options. Educate me if this seems naïve.

a) Canada goes it alone as an independent state after the mess of the Eurozone and the British Commonwealth floats it's value to what the market (globally) gives it.

b) Canada clings faithfully to the Crown and shares it's fate, whatever that eventually turns out to be.

oh, maybe there's a C) Carney is a heavyweight and Canada kicks Trump's ass, wipes out MAGA, finishes off the earlier Cartel/China American carcass cleaning and repurposes the 50 states within a Crown global empire.

Help me understand, on a simple mind map like mine, where Canadians' passions and fears distribute themselves.

The more pertinent question is, why are YOU so intent on spotting potential defects in Canada, and what designs do YOU have on Canada. It all sounds a little too predatory, in my opinion. Are you from the US?

As a Canadian, I certainly do not want to have any part of the United States of Isreal. USA politicians, including Trump, are literally bought and paid for by the Isreal lobby. The country is also run by the military industrial complex.

[norman]

Posted by Rizotto (here)

Are you from the US?

As a Canadian, I certainly do not want to have any part of the United States of Isreal..

I'm not from usa. I'm unfortunate enough to be under the same thumb you are, the people who created Israel.

[Flash]

Posted by norman (here)
I want to know what Canadians currently sticking up for Canada against the proposition Trump has raised see as the future for Canada.

I'm asking for any/all Canadian views and ideas but where I'm at with it in my own head at this point is a simple 2 way pair of options. Educate me if this seems naïve.

a) Canada goes it alone as an independent state after the mess of the Eurozone and the British Commonwealth floats it's value to what the market (globally) gives it.

b) Canada clings faithfully to the Crown and shares it's fate, whatever that eventually turns out to be.

oh, maybe there's a C) Carney is a heavyweight and Canada kicks Trump's ass, wipes out MAGA, finishes off the earlier Cartel/China American carcass cleaning and repurposes the 50 states within a Crown global empire.

Help me understand, on a simple mind map like mine, where Canadians' passions and fears distribute themselves.

I am pretty sure you are correct about Carney - we also almost always wear names showing who we are by the way - but why was he elected from his party?

Because the party reacted to Trump and thought he was the only one that could save the party and face Trump, although I am not sure of the latter.

Carney (flesh) is from the old establishment. I bet that Trump will respect him a tiny bit (because he respects none) since he made sure he was there.

Trump (trumping you, lying) is also from the hidden hand, israeli, extra terrestrial or other, the same hidden hand.

Trump the loosh creator. Feeding his masters.

[norman]

I seriously doubt there was any real electing going on in the selection of Carney.

Until something convinces me otherwise I see him as a direct parachute drop from Chatham House and the Crown. A 'big gun', in their eyes, and a shot at outsmarting and overpowering that pesky maga thing over the border.

I'm not saying JT wasn't supposed be heavyweight himself (in his own way), his Castro/Sinclair ancestry is extremely 'elite' but as an individual he was meant to be a pretty boy soft power seducer of sleeping fools. As soon as the Canadians woke up he was the wrong guy in the wrong position and now bringing Carney in is an attempt to fix that issue, in my estimation.

[Rizotto]

I'll repeat, again & again: What Canadians really need ASAP is a federal election.

Most Canadians are aware that the Liberal regime, whether headed by Turdeau or Carney, is a disastrous WEF agency.
We can debate later the Canadian constitution or modify our status, once we are rid of the WEF Liberals.

What Canadians DON'T need is interference by a predatory Trump, and his crude attempts at annexation. Because the Libs regime are going to use that as a pretext to put in 'emergency measures' and delay a federal elections that we so badly need.

Annexation psyops are even a family thing for the Trumps oligarchs. Below is an example of the ridiculous stunt Trump Jr. did in Greenland in January 2025 to give the impression Greenlanders favor joining the USA.
If that isn't a psyop, then what is it???
___________________________________________________________________

https://newrepublic.com/post/190070/...taged-homeless

January 9, 2025

Donald Trump Jr.’s Ridiculous Greenland Trip Just Took a Dark Turn
It appears the whole thing was staged.

A MAGA visit intended to make Greenland look pro–Donald Trump appears staged from the bottom up.

The so-called tourism trip saw Donald Trump Jr., far-right political pundit Charlie Kirk, and Trump administration staffer Sergio Gor visit the self-governing Danish territory at a time when the president-elect has made some odd jokes and eyebrow-raising militaristic threats about buying Greenland.

The trio’s presence on the island—and myriad photo ops with local residents—was not taken well by some of Greenland’s politicians, who slammed Don Jr.’s visit as a stunt to make the territory appear open to U.S. governance. Pipaluk Lynge, the chair of Greenland’s parliamentary foreign and security policy committee, told Politico that the territory wants its “own independence and democracy.” Lynge also warned the United States not to “invade” the nation, which is largely composed of Indigenous tribes, in light of its historical treatment of Alaska’s Indigenous population.

“Greenland is not for sale and will never be for sale,” Aaja Chemnitz, another member of Greenland’s Parliament, told NBC News.

But some of the behind-the-scenes details of the pro-Trump expedition are even worse.

Danish media reported Thursday that a series of photos featuring Kirk and Greenlandic residents in MAGA hats was staged. The MAGA cohort reportedly rounded up homeless people from the area—including one person from under a bridge—promising them a meal at the Hotel Hans Egede in exchange for their participation in the pro-Trump photo circuit.

Videos of the trip that circulated on X describe the Greenlandic participants as “the local community in Nuuk,” but several local sources that spoke with DR News described the photographed individuals as “homeless and socially disadvantaged” people who are often outside the supermarket directly across from the hotel where the Trump event was held.

“All they have to do is put on a cap and be in the Trump staff’s videos. They are being bribed, and it is deeply distasteful,” Tom Amtoft, a 28-year resident of Nuuk, told the Danish news outlet.

Amtoft reportedly witnessed the group’s attempts to get locals to wear the MAGA caps for the photos, describing the process as “very aggressive.” He said the Trump envoys chose a “selective” group of people “who could say that Greenland should be bought.”

Links to other articles on this event:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...t-in-greenland
https://www.arctictoday.com/donald-t...as-supporters/

______________________________________________________________

As for Greenland, they recently held a referendum resulting in most Greenlanders opting for an independent status. They also held elections recently.
That's the path Canada should take.

[T Smith]

Posted by Rizotto (here)
I'll repeat, again & again: What Canadians really need ASAP is a federal election.

What happens, hypothetically, if there is a federal election and the people of Canada get behind a Canexit? Where are we at in this discussion if that comes to pass? Would it be because the people have a gun to their heads, economically, and have no other choice? Or the result of a functioning democracy?

Annexation implies a forcible acquisition of territory. Which is absurd. No one is behind that. It wouldn't work, even if Trump went rogue against the populist movement that issued his mandate. The only annexation scenario (for lack of a better word) would be by the will of the Canadian people, a Canexit of sorts, not an annexation.

I have no idea what the overall political sentiment in Canada is at present regarding this rhetoric, but it seems to me if you are truly concerned about an "annexation", you should fear the will of the Canadian people, not Trump. Cuz that's the only way it would ever happen.

One more observation:

It may be hard for foreign observers -- especially those still under the yolk of globalist governments -- to truly appreciate exactly what is happening politically in the United States. The United States is undergoing a radical breakaway from the very same globalist interests that hitherto exploited the United States, its military, its innovation, its people, and its treasure as the brawn and flagship of its global order, and whose tentacles are still exploiting Canada and dictating its national policy. "Annexation rhetoric" from the Trump Administration is about advancing the national interests of the United States away from this globalist milieu relative to its economic relations with Canada, e.g. trade in lumber, dairy, etc. It is not about the cession of territory.

But what do I know? Perhaps Trump really is trying to sell the people of Canada on the idea of the becoming the 51st State... but even going that far is an entirely different dynamic from an annexation scenario. The Canadian people would still have to sign on the dotted line before that looks remotely like reality. More likely, the rhetoric is a whole lot of barking for a realignment in relations, and NOT about a cession of title.

[Eva2]

And I am reading reports that Carney will not be calling elections until November so reading different timing for this (if it ever happens). So, we now "officially" have an unelected PM running the show and there is all kinds of wrong about this scenario:

[truthseek]

I agree T. Smith.

Canada is totally under globalist control. Furthermore it has no leadership to speak of. During the last 9 years of the liberal government it has followed the globalist agenda play by play: this became extremely obvious during the pandemic, myself being multi-lingual, listening to the same press releases being read from in all western countries, in a pathetic attempt to convince people to be grateful for a lockdown.

It is so obvious that the current UNELECTED prime minister is a globalist monkey, one only need to look at his track record around the world and his family ties. Unfortunately, many Canadians are so programmed against "the Donald" that the liberal government (our version of the democrats) is using the Trump derangement as their strategy to win seats.

The globalist scheme for Canada has been genius from the standpoint in that they have changed the Canadian laws in such a way to allow for a takeover without revolt. Throughout the 9 years of rule they bought out the NDP opposition party to vote with them on every issue even when it became quite obvious that Canadians had had enough.

When Trudeau had outlasted his usefulness the adivisors convinced him to resign for the good of the party and made him fire the deputy prime minister beforehand to make sure Canada would not have a prime minister. Just before this, there would have been a no confidence vote in the government forcing an election, as the liberals had to present a budgetary accounting which should have failed misserably.

Hence, they invoked the "prorogation of government", which put parliamentary proceedings on hold until they could elect a new leader of their party, who in turn would be the new prime "monster". Enter Carnage: unelected, a globalist bureaucrat. Meanwhile Trudeau still had the power to jetset around the globe, make stupid comments on the world stage and also stack the senate with more liberal supporters (this is crucial as new bills must have senate approval in this country before they become law, irregardless of the goverment in power). How is that for Democracy?

Canada is in over their heads with an unelected prime minister, who has been seen quoting that "Canada needs a Globalist government". He is put in place as "the fixer". Canada is run coast to coast by white collar criminals, unfortunately this is not recognized by the average Canadian.

I don't agree with everything Trump does. I do admire that he is standing up against the globalist virus which has infiltrated our world (for millenia I might add, but that's a different topic all together). I know that he knows a lot more about Canada than he lets on and we need the USA to helps us recover from this great mess. We should be working together as such and not buy into the demonic division which is rapidly tracking around our world. Canada's liberal government is all about divisiveness under the auspice of "diversity and inclusion"

Canada is under a spell. Only through focussed positive intent and positive prayer can this have a succesful outcome.

[Rizotto]

How about we Canadian push for a federal election. The polls continually show that the opposition party, i.e. the Conservatives are way up high in the polls and would most likely win a majority. It's leader, Pierre Poilievre has made numerous statements against the WEF and globalization.

Simply let Canadian vote in a federal election, which needs to be held ASAP. We don't need right now a complicated rewriting of the constitution or hold consultations on whether Canada should be the 51st state (so bizarre). Right now we need an election, we can work on the other stuff afterwards.

As for Trump, he's not anti-globalist, it's more like he is just another faction of the globalists. He's made too many comments showing his bullying nature, such as annexing or attacking sovereign countries, e.g. not only Canada, but Panama, Greenland, Gaza. He's jerking everybody around, flip-flopping, e.g. after stopping weapons to Ukraine he just turned around to continue supplying weapons to Ukraine and sanction Russia if they don't agree to a 'ceasefire'. And now Trump has just launched a full-fledged attack on Yemen.

The most pressing issue with the USA doesn't seem to be discussed among USA citizens. Which is that most USA politicians are literally bought and paid for by the Israel lobby to do Israel's forever wars of expansion, which is how you got into a $37 trillions debt. What are USA citizens DOING to stop this.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Canadian 🇨🇦 Politician ARRESTED For Violating "COVID Rules"!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8ZK-lap2H8c

An already strained healthcare system faces the addition of 1.5 million new individuals, while 5.4 million Canadians 🇨🇦 currently lack access to a family doctor.

[onawah]

'Canada the Illusion'
THE CANADA ACT OF 1982 IS AN ACT OF BRITISH PARLIAMENT THAT WAS NEVER RATIFIED
Forbidden.News
Mar 17, 2025
https://forbiddennews.substack.com/p...m_medium=email

(I can't attest to the accuracy of this info, but Alexandra Bruce (Forbidden.News creator) is generally credible. The documentary was released in 2024, so it may have already been posted.)

"("'Canada the Illusion' (2024) – Documentary Film" - Running Time: 48 mins- Pub. Mar 16, 2025 on ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net)

This film is a collaboration between Canadian land patent expert, Doug Force and musician Timm Stein, that documents how there is no lawfully-established independent country called Canada. Doug Force further asserts that no confederation happened, because the provinces had never been sovereign states.

Furthermore, the Canada Act of 1982 is an act of British Parliament that was never ratified. In order to do so:

All provinces would need to sign Schedule B of the Act, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Québec would need to authorize a proclamation to enact Section 23.1.(a) of the Act.

Section 23.1.(a) Would be enacted through a proclamation.

Section 59.(3) would be enacted through a proclamation to repeal Section 59 and renumber the Act.

Section 58 would be enacted through a procalamation to pass the Act.

Doug Force says none these steps have been completed. In addition, the Royal Proclamation 1982 is only a proclamation stating that there will be a proclamation in the future. He says nothing was passed and nothing was enacted and therefore, "There is no Constitution. There is no Charter of Rights and Freedoms!"

Note that a charter differs from a constitution in this that the former is granted by a foreign government while the latter is established by the people, themselves.

Force walks us step-by-step through the history of Canadian law and he explains how in the Interpretations Act 1985, Canada is defined as the "internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada" and the land is not included, because they lost access to the land when the Dominion ended with the 1931 Statute of Westminster, which he calls "The most important document in the history of the landmass known as Canada!" in which he claims the land was naturally returned to the people.

Doug Force says, "This film is entirely based on facts and not opinions!" The viewer is strongly encouraged to verify each fact and that it is a matter of researching these statements and the historical legal documents presented here to awaken to the truth.

Doug Force says:

So… here are 11 very important questions that you need to ask yourself:

Where are the Articles of Confederation, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation?

Why was Canada known as the “Dominion of Canada” a British colony until 1938, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation?

Why in 1867 was the BNA act created to be Letters Patent for a Governor General to the Dominion of Canada if Canada had confederated and is a sovereign nation?

Why in 1893, would the British Parliament deem it necessary to repeal certain sections of the BNA act, with the “Statute Law Revisions act” if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation?

Why in 1931 would the British parliament create the “Statute of Westminster” to nullify the Dominion of Canada, if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation?

Why in 1946 did a foreign Monarch, King George VI appoint a representative for the UK, a Governor General and then command the Parliament of Canada to create Letters Patent and command the PM at that time to sign on his behalf those Letters Patent in 1947 for his Governor General, if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a Sovereign Nation?

Why did PM Trudeau in 1982 have the government create the “Canada Bill” and then take that Bill to a foreign Monarch and have her parliament pass that Bill as the “Canada Act, 1982” if Canada confederated 115 years earlier and is a sovereign nation?

Why do Prime Ministers and other officials when sworn into office here in Canada, swear their allegiance to a foreign monarch, Queen Elizabeth, and not to the people of Canada if Canada confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation?

If Canada is a sovereign nation, why does the Government of Canada in their Interpretations act define Canada as the internal waters and territorial seas if Canada confederated in 1867?

Why was it necessary in 1990 to sue a member of the federal parliament, J. Littlechild MP, to force him to do his duty to his constituents and have the courts rule against his constituents, if Canada had confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign Nation?

Why in the “Constitution act, 1867” of Canada is there no clause that allows for land for the Government of Canada to become a sovereign nation if Canada Confederated in 1867 and is a sovereign nation?

If the people in the 12 sovereign nations (Provinces and Territories) could awaken to what the Government of Canada Inc. really is (master that owns them upon their consent) and take the blinders off put there by those who call themselves the government, we could all have a bright future. The Government of Canada Inc. has painted itself as some sort of religious fairy tale set out to save everyone and keep them safe. Once people realize the truth and claim ownership over their land they can truly be free. Let us help you see the truth, The Myth is Canada.

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” – R. Buckminster Fuller

Share

TIMELINE OF EVENTS - CANADA'S HISTORIC EVENTS

Below are named legal documents that are directly related to the myth known as Canada.

1627 – 1663: Governors of New France

1663 – 1760: Governor Generals of New France

1670: Hudson’s Bay Company Chartered.

1759: Battle on the Plains of Abraham between France and England

1760 – 1763: Treaty of Paris aka Treaty of Peace and Friendship

1763: First “Letters Patent” issued by the British Crown

1763 – 1786: Governors of the Province of Quebec – England

1786 – 1841: Governor Generals of the “Province of Canada”

1791: The Constitutional Act

1841 – 1866: Governor Generals of the Province of Canada

1865: Colonial Laws Validity Act

1864: Quebec Resolutions / British North America (BNA) Act created.

1867: BNA Act passed by British Parliament cherry-picked from the Quebec Res. *Key document

1868: Rupert’s Land Act.

1869: Deed of Surrender. *Key document

1870: Manitoba Act

1871: BC Union

1871: BNA Act

1871: Treaty of Washington. *Key document

1873: Prince Edward Island Terms of Union

1876: Indian Act

1878: Letters Patent Revocation Act. *Key document

1886: BNA Act

1889: Interpretations Act (UK) – Sec. 18, Par. 3 – stating Canada is a Colony *Key document

1891: Judicature Acts (UK) – Ending the “Court of Chancery”

1893: Statute Law Revisions Act (UK) – Removal of Sec. 2 of the BNA act, legally removing the Monarchy from Canada *Key document

1898: Yukon Territory Act

1905: Alberta Act and Saskatchewan Act

1907: BNA Act

1907: Imperial Conferences

1911: Imperial Conferences

1915: BNA Act

1923: Imperial Conferences

1926: Native Sons of Canada. *Key document

1926: Balfour Declaration. *Key document

1930: BNA Act

1929 – 1930: Imperial Conferences.

1929: Manitoba Natural Resources Transfer Act

1930: Alberta Natural Resources Act

1930: Saskatchewan Natural Resources Act

1930: British North America Act

1931: Statute of Westminster. *Key document

1936-1937: Section 148 to be added to the BNA 1867. *Key document

1940: BNA Act

1943: BNA act, repealed by the Constitution Act, 1982

1946: BNA Act

1947: New “Letters Patent” signed by the PM Mackenzie King BUT not the King of England *Key document

1948: Income Tax Act. *Key document

1949: Newfoundland Act

1951: BNA Act

1952: Royal Styles and Titles Act, created the “Queen in Right of Canada” *Key document

1952: BNA Act

1960: BNA Act

1964: BNA Act

1965: BNA Act

1974: BNA Act

1975: BNA Act Part 1 and 2

1982: Canada Act. *Key document

1982: Royal Proclamation. *Key document

1983: Constitution Amendment Proclamation, 1983. An amendment of the Constitution Act, 1982 converting the status of the “Aboriginal People” from Sovereign to “Persons”. *Key document

1987: Meech Lake Accord aka the Constitutional Accord, failed

1992: Charlottetown Accord, failed

2000: Clarity Act.

OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS

The Quebec Act 1774

Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890

Merchant Shipping Act, 1894

Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960

Upper Canada Land Surrenders – Summary

Upper Canada Land Surrenders – Text

Interpretation Act, 1985. This Interpretation Act, under the definitions section, states clearly what “Canada” is (page 21): Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada; And again the definition that follows it is “Canadian Waters” and it is defined as: Canadian waters, includes the territorial sea of Canada and the internal waters of Canada; The key word here in identifying a grand deception is the word “includes”. Every law dictionary (and others) define includes as “to contain” and one of the universal common law maxims (principles of law) that Canada was founded upon states, for further clarity, “The inclusion of one is the exclusion of all others.” It is clear, with the definition of “includes” above, what The Interpretation Act defines Canada as. And it is even clearer when Canada is described as the exact same thing as “Canadian Waters”. So… What is Canada?

Acts of the Parliament, 1987

(A FULL TRANSCRIPT OF THIS FILM APPEARS BENEATH THE VIDEO, HERE)

ForbiddenNews Substack is a reader-supported publication. "
https://rumble.com/v6qra8g-canada-th...tary-film.html

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6ojp7o/?pub=4

[Yoda]

Mark Carney has a lot of different masks. Here is another layer.



Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AsPpwCT8XAEO



Canadian Trust and Estate Administration expert, Dr Sidney Brewer explains what nobody in either Canada or the US is being told: Canada Is a Failed State and Mark Carney Is BlackRock’s Bankruptcy Trustee.

Dr Brewer says that Canada is a signatory on the International Will Conventions of 1973 and that Mark Carney is being brought in as the unelected Prime Minister of Canada to be granted an Administration Bond, in order to act as an Executor to liquidate Canadian assets, in order to legally and lawfully go into the United States of America.

…

TRANSCRIPT

Dr Sidney Brewer: What’s up everybody, Sidney here. I’m going to explain to you exactly what’s going on. I know that a lot of you have been following me for a while, especially under the Trust and the Estate Administration sides of the world, especially if you’re in Canada and the United States, and why I’ve been moving everybody into a Common Law Organizational Trust and trying to protect you and shelter you from the situation that is actually playing-out in the general public, as we speak.

And it’s because there’s a really big secret that the Canadian citizens, as well as the Americans, are not actually being exposed to or being told. And I’m going to expose to you, right now why Mark Carney is actually in Canada.

So it actually has to do with Canada being liquidated. Canada is in probate at the moment, which means that the Trust and the Estate Administration, he’s been appointed as Executor on behalf of the Crown to basically, liquidate and probate the Estate so that Canada can go into the United States of America legally and lawfully.

That’s actually the right answer. And I know a lot of Canadians in here, especially First Nations and all you guys are not going to agree with me, but it is what’s being done, as we speak.

And there is a 90-day system going on, right now, which is January, February, and March. And that’s why the big actions are actually going to take place in March.

There’s a reason why this is happening. And I know that people don’t really know anything about asset-backed securities. That’s why Mark Carney is actually here. It’s because he was the Governor General of the Bank of Canada, the Governor General of the Bank of England, tied directly to the Crown, which is all of the allodial titles in the asset-backed securities.

That’s why Justin Trudeau had to step down. And that’s why he [Mark Carney] has to step in to the position of an unelected PM, in order to be able to get what’s called an Administration Bond, in order to liquidate the affairs. Because he is one of the foremost authorities on asset-backed securities in Canada and the United States.

And again, here are some of the examples why probate will be necessary:

(Reads from unnamed legal document)

“Financial institutions: In order to release funds from the deceased’s accounts, a financial institution or a broker, according to internal policy, will require the will to probate unless the value of the accounts is below the threshold.

“Title of assets: When transferring assets, the ownership of which is recorded in registrars, the record-keeping authority must be satisfied that the Executor has the power to deal with such assets.

(Meaning they gotta be competent).

“Examples of this class of property are: 1) land, 2) bonds, 3) public corporate shares, and 4) valuable art, which can be donated to charity.

“Property outside the jurisdiction: If some of the Estate Assets are situated outside the Province, it is necessary that an application be made to the court in that jurisdiction that the property be dealt with. Probate will have to be issued in the province where the assets are situated, so that the application of resealing or ancillary grant can be made.

“Involved in litigation: If the estate is involved in litigation, obtaining probate will be necessary. Litigation is actually quite common with the Crown, especially when dealing with First Nations.”

Now, you know why they’re doing what they’re doing. Will provided.

So let’s just move on. I’m gonna bring you to the important part. It’s the Testator’s Nominated Executor. So, this has to do with what Queen Elizabeth’s orders that just came out and got released and why you now know why Carney’s here.

(Continues to read from document)

“To illustrate the court’s reluctance to set aside the Testator’s Nominated Executor, even a person in prison or a Non-Resident individual may be appointed. This direction is allowed, if the Will does not state who the Executor is to be, but delegates the right to another person or a group of persons to name the Executor, such as the following.

“By permitting the testator to allow the person to nominate the Executor, the court is recognizing the Testator’s right to choose whomever he or she wishes to administer the Estate.

“It is felt that the Testator’s choice will be won better than that would result from the following arbitrary rules made for that purpose.”

They don’t want this going to court. They just want it dealt and done and over with. It was part of an agreement that was done to liquidate the estate of Canada, so that it can be entered into the United States, under a backdoor contract, because they want all of North America united under one system.

This is a true story. This is happening, right now, as we speak.

“Non-Resident Executor”. So for those of you that are Canadians in here and you’re lawyers and attorneys or any of the citizens that think that you understand that because, “Oh, they’re not citizens, they hold citizenship in other residencies!” They have other things going on, “Mark Carney is not Canadian!” “He’s English!” He’s this, he’s that, he’s Irish!”

You don’t know the law. You don’t know Trust and Estate administration. So listen to what they say about Non-Resident Executors:

(Reads from legal document)

“A person need not be a Resident in the Province or in Canada to be an Executor. However, if the person resides in a jurisdiction other than another Province of Canada or the British Commonwealth countries, it is necessary for the Non-Resident to post an Administration Bond, unless 1) the Will specifically waives the bond or 2) the beneficiaries consent to a waiver of the bond or 3) a judge agrees to make an order allowing the bond to be waived.”

So even the first one in there, the Executor has to post an Administrative Bond. That’s why Mark Carney is in Canada, as an unelected going into the PM position, because he will be granted an Administration Bond in order to act as the Executor to liquidate the affairs of Canada over to the United States.

For those of you that think, for some weird reason that this is not happening, that Canada isn’t part of the United States, they are actually accumulating all of the assets, right now. They’re getting all the records in place. They’re getting everything constructed. That’s why Parliament is prorated.

You can’t pass laws when you’re under probate. Nothing can move under probate. Everything must be settled-out. All transactions have to be settled. That’s why nothing is moving. That’s why Mark Carney is here. That’s why you’re seeing all of these things play out. It’s all part of the script. That’s what’s going on in the world.

So anyway, welcome to the wonderful world of Trust and Estate Administration and welcome to the Backdoor Deals that happen around the world that you probably don’t know sh!t about.

And just to take it one step further, I’m gonna give you the Smoking Gun:

“International wills: Not applicable in Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Québec, and Yukon, conveniently, territories and civil jurisdictions.

“On October 26th, 1973, in Washington, DC, various jurisdictions signed a convention providing a uniform law of form of International Will. The intent was to assist Testators with assets in multiple jurisdictions. A Jurisdiction may be an entire country, or in countries such as Canada, each province is a Jurisdiction.

“The countries and the states that signed the convention recognize that the will made in compliance with the annex to the convention. In other words, if a person domiciled in Belgium, a signatory jurisdiction, signs a will in Belgium, according to the prescribed international form, then all other jurisdictions, who are party to the convention will recognize that the will as validly made within their jurisdiction.

“An international will is one signed in according to the requirements listed in the convention. One requirement is that the will be signed before two witnesses and an authorized person. Sound familiar, “Authorized Person”? In Canada, an Authorized Person is a lawyer. Another requirement is that, after the will has been executed, the authorized person must complete a certification form.”

Isn’t that interesting?

These wills are very rarely used, since the person usually makes a will when they are at home, but those wills are validly made in accordance with Provincial and State requirements. So Canada was a signatory on the International Wills Convention on October 26, 1973 in Washington, DC, which means, yes, the full jurisdiction is there to liquidate the assets.

And to the First Nations community: your treaty and agreements were with the Crown, which was a subsidiary, which means that the Jurisdiction; your fight isn’t actually with the Crown, it’s with the United States of America, because that deal has already been done and it’s in probate, right now to liquidate all of the estates and all of the assets.

Now, you know why I moved everybody into a Common Law organizational trust, registered with the Secretary of State in the United States, so that you guys were protected during this transfer stage.

You’re welcome.


Contributed by Alexandra Bruce
Contact

FacebookMastodonEmailShare

[truthseek]

Here's another example of the liberal dog and pony show, revealing yet again the kinds of dictators that they are. Canadians on this forum, be sure to cast your vote!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=K-DtqkWe0Lw

[Ernie Nemeth]

All that proof is for fools, who, even when presented with receipts will not accept the facts. So why bother?

Canada has a king. That same king is the king of Britain. So, is Canada a sovereign state? Of course not, and never was.

Confederation was a ruse...