Vaccine Crimes

[Eva2]

'A series of bombshell emails has just been released implicating Canada’s outgoing Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, in overseeing a series of experimental drug trials on Inuit infants without parental or community consent.

This information first came to light through an Access to Information request by Bret Sears, who uncovered a staggering 450,000-page treasure trove of emails detailing a secretive research program led by one of Canada’s chief architects behind the Orwellian COVID-19 response.

The program aimed to study the efficacy of an AstraZeneca drug to reduce RSV-related hospitalizations, but ultimately failed to achieve its goals.

Independent investigator Donald Best reviewed many of these emails. He found that despite concerns raised by health-care workers about the lack of informed consent and the absence of Inuit community involvement in the decision-making process, the trials continued.

Theresa Tam emails reveal unethical medical experiments on Inuit
babies

This was nothing but an unethical and appalling experiment on vulnerable babies.

And despite the failures, the drug, known as PVZ, is still being recommended for “infants and young children with health conditions that make them vulnerable to severe RSV disease.”

This information has been buried in secrecy for years. It adds to the alarming pattern of medical experiments conducted on Canada’s Indigenous communities and Canadians at large at the hands of Canada’s Public Health Agency.

These findings leave us with an important question: How far did these unethical practices go, and who, if anyone, will be held responsible?

Yours truly,

Tamara Ugolini '

See link below for video:

https://www.rebelnews.com/theresa_ta...ource=therebel

[onawah]

Peak Insanity--mRNA Products in the Development Pipeline
James Roguski
Mar 06, 2025
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...he-development

"Trillions of dollars are being invested in developing hundreds of mRNA "vaccines" and other mRNA-based "therapies." Our society has reached "Peak Insanity."

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bhRUIHpIRcI

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3YAbyCDpnAI

Moderna has dozens of mRNA “vaccines” in their development pipeline:
mRNA-1010 (Flu) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05606965

mRNA-1011 (Flu) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05827068

mRNA-1012 (Flu) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05827068

mRNA-1018 (Pandemic Flu) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05972174

mRNA-1020 (Flu) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05333289

mRNA-1030 (Flu) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05333289

mRNA-1045 (Flu + RSV vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05585632

MRNA-1073 (COVID + FLU) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05375838

mRNA-1083 (Flu + COVID vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06694389

mRNA-1189 (EBV vaccine to prevent infectious mononucleosis) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05164094

mRNA 1195 (EBV vaccine to address EBV sequelae) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05831111

mRNA-1215 (Nipah vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05398796

mRNA-1230 (Flu + COVID + RSV vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05585632

mRNA-1273 (COVID-19 vaccine Spikevax®)

mRNA-1273.815 (COVID-19 vaccine adolescents)

mRNA-1273.815 (COVID-19 vaccine pediatrics)

mRNA-1287 (Endemic HCoV Human Coronavirus vaccine)

mRNA-1283 (COVID-19 vaccine Next gen) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05137236

mRNA-1345 (RSV mRESVIA® Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine older adults)

mRNA-1345 (RSV Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine pediatrics) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06143046

mRNA-1365 (RSV + hMPV Human MetaPneumoVirus vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05743881

mRNA-1403 (Norovirus vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06592794

mRNA-1405 (Norovirus vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05992935

mRNA-1468 (VZV Varicella-zoster virus chickenpox/shingles vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05701800

mRNA-1574 (HIV vaccine)

mRNA-1608 (HSV Herpes Simplex Virus vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06033261

mRNA-1644 (HIV Vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05001373

mRNA-1647 (Cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05085366

mRNA-1769 (Mpox vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05995275

mRNA-1893 (Zika vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT04917861

mRNA-1975 (Lyme Vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05975099

mRNA-1982 (Lyme Vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05975099

CANCER THERAPIES:
mRNA-2752 (OX40L/IL-23/IL-36γ (Triplet) Solid tumors/lymphoma) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT03739931

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) adjuvant melanoma)

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – adjuvant NSCLC)

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – adjuvant NSCLC post neoadjuvant treatment)

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC))

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – renal cell carcinoma (RCC))

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) - adjuvant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC))

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – early and late solid tumor (first in human)) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT03313778

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – renal cell carcinoma (RCC))

mRNA-4157 (Individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) – bladder cancer)

mRNA-4359 (Checkpoint vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05533697

mRNA-5671 (KRAS vaccine) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT03948763

OTHER DISEASES:
mRNA-0184 Relaxin CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06655870

mRNA-3139 Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTC)

mRNA-3210 Phenylketonuria (PKU) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06147856

mRNA-3351 Crigler-Najjar Syndrome Type 1 (CN-1)

mRNA-3692 Cystic Fibrosis (CF)* / VX-522

mRNA-3705 Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT04899310

mRNA-3745 Glycogen storage disease Type 1a (GSD1a) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05095727

mRNA-3927 Propionic Acidemia (PA) CLINICAL TRIAL NCT04159103

https://www.modernatx.com/en-US/rese...oduct-pipeline

https://investors.modernatx.com/even...l/default.aspx

https://www.accessnewswire.com/newsr...nes-day-748485

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-inf...t-pandemic-flu

CureVac
A Study on the Safety and Immunogenicity of Hexavalent Influenza mRNA Vaccine in Adult Participants 50 Years of Age and Older

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06744205

GlaxoSmithKline
A Study on the Safety, Reactogenicity and Immune Response of a Vaccine Against Influenza in Healthy Younger and Older Adults

GlaxoSmithKline's (GSK) messenger RNA (mRNA)-based monovalent vaccine (GSK4382276A) candidate against influenza in healthy younger adults (YA) and older adults (OA).

GSK/CureVac’s GSK4382276 and GSK4388067
Influenza and, separately, COVID-19
GSK is also targeting both influenza and COVID-19, though currently with separate products. In July, the British multinational bought the global rights to develop CureVac’s investigational mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 (GSK4388067) and influenza (GSK4382276), with the option to develop a combination and an additional vaccine against avian flu. GSK4388067 and GSK4382276 are both currently in Phase II trials and are therefore not too far behind their rivals.

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05446740

Hans W. Nijman, MD PHD, University Medical Center Groningen
Ovarian Cancer Treatment With a Liposome Formulated mRNA Vaccine in Combination With (Neo-)Adjuvant Chemotherapy (OLIVIA)

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT04163094

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Dose Escalation, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of a Nipah Virus (NiV) mRNA Vaccine, mRNA-1215, in Healthy Adults

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05398796

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Single Dose of H1ssF-3928 mRNA-LNP in Healthy Adults

In May 2023, NIAID started enrolling participants in a phase 1 trial studying a universal flu vaccine that uses mRNA technology.

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05755620

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of BG505 MD39.3, BG505 MD39.3 gp151, and BG505 MD39.3 gp151 CD4KO HIV Trimer mRNA Vaccines in Healthy, HIV-uninfected Adult Participants

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05217641

Pfizer
A Study to Evaluate a Modified RNA Vaccine Against Influenza in Adults 18 Years of Age or Older

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05540522

Ruijin Hospital
Mechanistic Study of EBV mRNA Vaccine (WGc-043) in EBV-Positive Relapsed/​Refractory Lymphoma (WGc-043)

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06788600

Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
A Study on the Safety and Immunogenicity of Hexavalent Influenza mRNA Vaccine in Adult Participants 50 Years of Age and Older

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06744205

Safety and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Influenza mRNA Vaccine MRT5407 in Adult Participants18 Years of Age and Older.

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT05553301

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Treatment of Advanced Endocrine Tumor With Individualized mRNA Neoantigen Vaccine (mRNA-0523-L001)

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT06141369

Stemirna Therapeutics
Clinical Study of Personalized mRNA Vaccine Encoding Neoantigen in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

CLINICAL TRIAL NCT03908671

The information listed above is merely a drop in the bucket.





NotSafeAndNotEffective.com
CullingIsMurder.com
PCRfraud.com
MaskCharade.com
StopTheGlobalAgenda.com
I claim no copyright of any kind whatsoever, over any of my work, ever. Everyone is encouraged to copy any and all of it, in part, or in full, and use it for whatever purposes they wish. In fact, I would be delighted if someone were to copy this entire body of work. I encourage everyone to duplicate and mirror it in its entirety. I also encourage everyone to adapt and utilize the information in whatever manner they deem appropriate. No citation or other reference is requested or required. It would actually bring me great joy to see this information multiply exponentially and "go viral".

All content is free to all readers.

All support is deeply appreciated.James Roguski "
310-619-3055
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive

Please help spread the word about the harmful effects of the mRNA bioweapons:

[Eva2]

[onawah]

Breaking: Makary, Bhattacharya Nominations Move to Full Senate Vote, But Trump Pulls Weldon Nomination to Lead CDC
March 13, 2025
by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250313

(Podcast at the link and discussion featuring C.A. Fitts)

"Dr. David Weldon’s hearing was to take place today before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. However, a White House official last night told Weldon “they didn’t have the votes to confirm” his nomination, according to The New York Times.

The U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions this morning canceled a scheduled hearing on the nomination of Dr. David Weldon, President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Axios was the first to break the news, stating that Weldon’s “views questioning certain vaccines have garnered attention since he was nominated months ago and were sure to play a prominent role in questioning.”

The New York Times reached Weldon by phone. The former Florida congressman said he learned of the decision last night when a White House official told him that “they didn’t have the votes to confirm” his nomination.

In a statement to media, posted on X, Weldon said, “The concern of many people is that Big Pharma was behind this, which is probably true. They are probably the most powerful lobbying organization in Washington DC giving millions of dollars to politicians on both sides of the aisle.”

Mary Talley Bowden MD
@MdBreathe
Heartfelt statement sent to reporters from Dr Dave Weldon following withdrawal of his nomination for CDC (1/4):
10:24 AM · Mar 13, 2025
·
518.6K
Views

Meanwhile, the Senate Health committee today voted 14-9 to endorse Dr. Marty Makary to lead the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and 12-11 to endorse Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Both Makary and Bhattacharya “largely breezed through” their Senate confirmation hearings and are now set to be confirmed by a full Senate vote, according to STAT News.

Given the Republican control of the Senate, it is expected that Makary and Bhattacharya will be confirmed.

Weldon nomination pulled amid Texas measles outbreak, CDC plan to study vaccines

Weldon, 71, is a practicing internal medicine doctor and Army veteran. He represented Florida in Congress from 1995 to 2009.

The CDC has a $9 billion budget and staff of around 13,000, according to NBC.

According to the Times, Weldon said he had been excited about the opportunity to help restore the public’s confidence in the CDC and serve his country again.

Weldon had also been looking forward to working on the MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) agenda to address the proliferation of chronic diseases among U.S. Americans, particularly children.

In the days leading up to Weldon’s planned hearing, numerous media outlets ran a slew of articles highlighting Weldon’s history of questioning vaccine safety.

Reuters on March 7 broke the news that the CDC was planning a study on the possible link between vaccines and autism. Some senators “have expressed concerns over Weldon’s views on vaccines,” Reuters said.

The Washington Post confirmed that the CDC planned to “leave no stone unturned in its mission to figure out” why autism rates are soaring, including using the agency’s Vaccine Safety Datalink database to study any possible links between vaccines and autism.

The last-minute plan to pull Weldon’s nomination came against the backdrop of news reports about the CDC’s planned study and the West Texas measles outbreak. On March 10, Forbes reported, “Vaccine Skeptic Dave Weldon Is Up To Lead CDC As Measles And Flu Rage.”

According to Forbes, Weldon was a friend of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who “holds similar and, in some cases, seemingly more extreme views on some health matters.”

On March 12, STAT News reported, under the headline, “How CDC nominee Dave Weldon’s support for anti-vaccine theories runs long and deep” that Weldon in 2004 asked the U.S. House Appropriations Committee chair to fund an autism research center that would be led by Dr. Andrew Wakefield.

Wakefield was the first author of the 1998 study, published and later retracted in The Lancet, that linked the MMR vaccine to autism in certain children.

According to STAT News, Weldon requested $1.9 million in the 2005 budget for the center to study “the biological origins” of childhood developmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, Congress chose not to fund it.

In 2007, Weldon introduced a bill “to improve vaccine safety research” that would have transferred the responsibility of tracking vaccine safety from the CDC to an independent agency within HHS.

The bill stipulated that the independent agency would:

Conduct or support safety research and monitor licensed vaccines.
Develop a vaccine safety research agenda.
Evaluate means to promote compliance with federal adverse reaction reporting requirements.
Provide a clearinghouse for vaccine studies.
Ensure that functions relating to vaccine monitoring or research on adverse reactions are not carried out by anyone with a conflict of interest.
Oversee the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project.
Resolve U.S. conflicts of interest related to international agreements, partnerships, and activities.
However, the bill never made it to the House floor for a vote."

Watch Mary Holland discuss the breaking news on CHD.TV:
(Video at the link with C.A. Fitts)

[mountain_jim]

copying here

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1904941620283253060

Tucker Carlson

@TuckerCarlson

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong is a surgeon who made billions inventing cancer drugs. He says that Covid, and the vaccines that didn’t stop it, are likely causing a global epidemic of terrifyingly aggressive cancers.

(0:00) Why Are Cancer Rates Rising in Young People?
(6:16) What Is Causing This Cancer Epidemic?
(14:52) Is There a Connection Between Covid and Cancer?
(25:33) Why Dr. Soon-Shiong Never Got Covid
(39:36) How Big Pharma Tried to Undermine Dr. Soon-Shiong
(47:35) Dr. Soon-Shiong’s Analysis of RFK Jr.
(1:02:47) The Healthcare Industry’s Conflict of Interest
(1:05:51) How to Strengthen Your Immune System
(1:10:32) What Your Doctor Won’t Tell You About How to Fight Cancer
(1:20:58) Why Hasn’t Anyone Faced Consequences for These Crimes?
(1:33:59) Why Dr. Soon-Shiong Bought the LA Times

Includes paid partnerships.

[mountain_jim]

[mountain_jim]

copying here

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1907478555727904904

Tucker Carlson

@TuckerCarlson

Five years after the greatest crime in American history, the only people who’ve been punished are the ones who told the truth about Covid. Dr. Mary Talley Bowden is one of them.

0:00 Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Was Right All Along
6:19 The Origin of the Government’s Propaganda Campaign
17:57 How the Medical Establishment Tried to Destroy Dr. Bowden
22:30 How Much Money Was Made From the Pandemic?
24:17 How Effective Is Ivermectin?
20:24 When Did the Healthcare Industry Become Politicized?
39:26 The Health of Dr. Bowden’s Patients Compared to Others
49:04 Does the COVID Shot Need to Be Pulled From the Market?
50:06 They’re Giving Babies the Covid Shot
53:33 The Link Between Cancer and Covid
1:00:25 The Legal Protection of Vaccine Developers
1:09:48 Why Is There So Much Secrecy Around Covid Data?
1:13:01 Will Medicine Get Better Because of This?
1:20:00 How to Fix the Healthcare Industry

Includes paid partnerships.

updated with this view


Liz Churchill
@liz_churchill10
·
14h
History will view this as the most egregious CRIME against humanity.

“9 MILLION CHILDREN have received the latest ‘Covid Booster’ despite VAERS linking 38,000 deaths to these shots…enough to pull any other drug off the market…but the FDA doubled down”

[onawah]

Japanese Study: Spike Protein in Brain Arteries 17 Months After mRNA Jabs
Sonia Elijah
Apr 05, 2025
https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/japane...m_medium=email

"Two new studies- one from Germany, the other from Japan- join the rising stack of research tearing down the “safe and effective” and “it just stays in the arm” claims health authorities relentlessly sold about the Covid mRNA jabs, rolled out at warp speed and even mandated in some countries.

The Simonis et al. study from Germany, shows how Pfizer’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax leave “persistent H3K27ac epigenetic marks” that “rev-up” gene activity and cytokine release (eg., IL-1β) for months. After two Spikevax doses and a Comirnaty booster, macrophages stay primed, overreacting to spike protein with a “sustained pro-inflammatory immune response.” The findings point to a disturbing picture of chronic inflammation with cancer risks (e.g., Roe et al., 2017, on H3K27ac in leukemia) tied to this epigenetic rewiring.

New Covid mRNA Shot Study: Immune Boost or Ticking Cancer Time Bomb?
Sonia Elijah
·
Mar 28
New Covid mRNA Shot Study: Immune Boost or Ticking Cancer Time Bomb?
A new study praises Covid mRNA shots’ immune boost, but could their epigenetic findings suggest a ticking cancer time bomb?

Read full story: https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/new-co...t-study-immune

Now, a Japanese study by Ota et al., published in the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, reveals: SARS-CoV-2 spike protein lingering in the cerebral (brain) arteries of hemorrhagic stroke patients, up to 17 months post-vaccination.

The team at Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital examined 19 patients who suffered brain bleeds: 16 vaccinated, 3 unvaccinated, between 2023 and 2024. Using immunohistochemical staining, they found spike protein in 43.8% of vaccinated patients (7 of 16), lodged in the intima (inner lining) of brain arteries.



Source: “Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination”

In one case, a 70-year-old woman, had spike protein present 17 months after her last shot and in another, 11 months.

They also found immune cells (CD4+ T-cells, CD8+ T-cells, and CD68+ macrophages) targeting spike protein in these vessels, though not enough to signal active vasculitis (full-on vessel damage).

In situ hybridization revealed both vaccine and virus-derived mRNA encoding spike in select cases, yet no nucleocapsid protein was present (a sign of active viral infection). Two of three unvaccinated had spike too, likely from past infections.

In addition, the researchers noted:

“Spike protein positivity was observed exclusively in female patients”

This women-only pattern prompts questions: does it point to sex-specific immune responses, like stronger T-cell activation in women? And more critically: are women at greater risk for mRNA jab adverse events?

The researchers concluded:

“Although the possibility of spike protein expression due to asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection cannot be entirely excluded, this study demonstrated prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the cerebral arteries following mRNA vaccination. Additionally, some inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in spike-positive vessels. These findings raise significant concerns regarding the biodistribution of lipid nanoparticle-based vaccines and their long-term safety. Global replication studies are urgently required to validate these findings and ensure comprehensive safety evaluations of mRNA vaccines.”

The Japanese study by Ota et al. exposes spike protein lingering in brain arteries months to years post-vaccination, which dismantles the wide-spread claim of quick spike clearance. Also, it’s yet more evidence that the “vaccine stays in the arm” line fed to the public was false.

Notably, Japan’s own early tests hinted at this spread. The earliest documented biodistribution study on Pfizer's lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) related to their mRNA COVID-19 jab, was conducted in Japan, in November 2020. The study was performed as part of the regulatory evaluation process by Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) before the jab’s approval in February 2021. Wistar Han rats were used to track radiolabeled LNPs. The concerning results showed that LNPs were detected in the spleen, adrenal glands, ovaries, bone marrow, and trace amounts in brain, heart, and lungs. However, this animal study was limited to just 48 hours.

Both the German and Japan studies point to spike protein persisting in the body and causing problems. The German findings of primed macrophages could fuel Japan’s findings of arterial inflammation: macrophages primed by H3K27ac overreacting to spike protein in vessels, fueling inflammation that weakens arteries or worse- potentially triggering brain bleeds. For the billions jabbed, especially women, this is alarming.

The researchers push for global replication studies to validate their findings and ensure comprehensive safety evaluations of these novel jabs is urgently warranted and long overdue. Studies like this point to the egregious fact that regulators failed to conduct the necessary comprehensive safety evaluations before the rollout, but worse yet, 5 years on, they’re still asleep at the wheel.

Sonia Elijah investigates is a reader-supported publication."

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by onawah (here)
Japanese Study: Spike Protein in Brain Arteries 17 Months After mRNA Jabs

As I just noted in a post on another Covid Vaccine thread, The Covid Vaccines: "The Biggest Crime Ever Committed on Humanity" - Post #128, I think that this "17 month" time span is a minimum on how long the spike protein can last, meaning it could last longer, but we don't have testing to verify that, rather than this "17 month" time period being the maximum time the spike protein could possibly last.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1909017370628354441

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox

The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials.

There was a "bait and switch." The clinical trials tested "Process 1" while the public received "Process 2."

And what they never told you is that "Process 2" was only tested on about 252 people, instead of 40,000 people.

They also didn't tell you that the vials were contaminated with plasmid DNA.

A new study by Kevin McKernan and colleagues found "the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 to 509-fold."

In layman's terms, that's not 500%, that is up to 500 times the amount of residual DNA that is acceptable.

[onawah]

Dr Astrid Stuckelberger: Synthetic Biology with Nanocircuits that Go with 5G
Forbidden.News
Apr 06, 2025
https://forbiddennews.substack.com/p...m_medium=email

(Many links to other articles and videos in this article, too many Rumble videos to embed in one post, but the first one mentioned featuring Astrid Stuckleberger is at the end of this post.)
"FOR SOMETHING TO BE BIOLOGICAL, YOU NEED PHOSPHOROUS AND NITROGEN AND THEY FOUND NOTHING LIKE THAT IN ALL THE VIALS THEY SAW


RUMBLE VIDEO (at the end of this post): "Dr Astrid Stuckelberger: Synthetic Biology with Nanocircuits that Go with 5G" - Pub. April 6, 2025

"This is a recent interview with Swiss Public Health expert, Dr Astrid Stuckelberger about the preoccupation with the term "mRNA" when defining in the ingredients of the jab, when mRNA is the least of it.

What we're dealing with is synthetic biology and nanocircuitry.

TRANSCRIPT

Dr Astrid Stuckelberger: And I want to answer to, you know, what is in the jab and what's going on with the 5G. You know, the question that Pascal said, "Ask Astrid, because it's very important."

I've been into one of the first ones who really read and said "There is oxide graphene". Some scientists in Spain, Professor [Pablo] Campra found, you know, massive oxide graphene in nanoparticle in the job in June 2021. And then, he made another report, final in November 2021.

And then, others made, like Professor Arne Burkhardt made very scientific, really in the lab of like a medical analysis of the jab. And he did, in front of lawyers. He said "This is a crime against humanity. Anybody jabbing this thing is –" it's Pfizer – it was Pfizer – "Is is a criminal."

And he found he confirmed oxide graphene. He confirmed parasites. He confirmed metal; chrome, nickel that should never be there or massively – nanoparticle. And then, he also confirmed there is a RFID-type of thing in there.

So he did a very interesting move. He took lawyers to say and to affirm.

Now, there are others. And it's very interesting, you know, how we go in a crime scene.

We have one more element, one more, some contradictory, some not. A lot of people are talking of "mRNA, mRNA. spike, mRNA," but they never really give the nature of this mRNA. And two scientists started to do the whistleblowing, Dr Nagase in Canada and Dr Monteverde.

And for me, that was a key to this crime scene. And they said that, "For something to be biological, you need phosphorous and nitrogen." And they found nothing like that in all the vials they saw.

And it was confirmed again, after. So, it's not biological. What is in this little vial is not biological! So what is it? It is synthetic nanotech. Yes. And and beyond maybe other things we don't know.

You see, I leave it open, because we are in such a crazy situation of evil that we have to be open, so that we can stop and treat people.

So now, in the scientific community where I speak a lot, you know, in conference, I show the graphic of first question. "Is it biological or not?"

It's not. It's synthetic. David Martin said "They should never have accepted those patents. They're all synthetic, not biological!"

Then, you you start explaining. But if you explain mRNA, you have to define if it is synthetic or not. You have to say, "Is it a nanorobot," and you call mRNA?

Or do you call mRNA the consequence of a causality – and the causality is something synthetic and like a robot, which I think that is.

The mRNA spike is only an effect or an element of this nanocircuit and nanotech, because it's not possible that spike protein is everywhere, in the body after an injection.

So it is the transporter for oxide graphene; is like a flying carpet. I've made a report on that "flying carpet".

And it's – you can put a genome, you can put a parasite, you can put a bacteria and you can code it. And it mimics the code of a molecule, because we have the codes of molecules with Dr [Jacques] Benveniste in France and Professor [Luc] Montagnier tried to steal all his findings and then he got killed.

You know, so we know that biocoding exists since 50 years, but it's become very sophisticated, now. And they can send this biocode to the oxide graphene...it can load the data, up to terahertz and it can send it. And so it is like a computer.

Bill Gates is perfectly suited to know, with his engineers to develop this with DARPA. So we know this, that this can take control of the mind and of the body. And I invite everybody who has not seen this fantastic video of Dr Charles Morgan of DARPA.

And he's teaching on YouTube, the military, how oxide graphene can take command of someone on the other side of Earth through Wi-Fi and it's called "Psycho-Neurobiology and War". I don't know if you've seen it?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U

VIDEO: "Dr Charles Morgan on Psycho-Neurobiology and War" - Orig. Pub. June 15, 2018

Army Soldier: (Introducing Dr Morgan) Today, we have Dr Charles Morgan to talk to us about neuroscience and psychology and a whole gamut of things.

Right now, he is a Professor of National Security Studies at the University of New Haven. His focus is teaching National Security Studies, Domestic and International Intelligence Analysis and issues.

Dr Morgan is developing a concentration in the human aspects, intelligence analysis and Psychological Operations arenas, that are relevant to the Intelligence Community.

He has a pretty robust background, with military folks, doing research at Sears School, helping with selection processes for Special Operations Forces, down in Fort Bragg, etc. So, without further ado, I'll hand it over.

Dr Charles Morgan: So, what I would like to talk to you a little bit about today is something I was asked to do in 2010 and 2011. I was getting ready to leave, over at CIA, where I'd worked for a number of years.

And the Intelligence Science Board said, "Could you give us a brief on what's in store for us in the future?"

I was like, "I don't know. Predicting the future is really hard." So I told my boss at the time, I said, "Well, I think the best I'll do is make an estimate, over what I think is going to happen in the next five years," given certain technologies that were being developed at the time – and this is a bit of an extension of that – I present it to the SSG.

And it was some information I think some people didn't know. And I think it's good for people to be aware of what's going on out there.

The one thing that makes predicting a little bit of the future easier, when you look at biomedical science is that labs are working fairly systematically with overtly-stated goals.

But the really fun part was that you're taking over somebody else's physical body with the mind of another human. So what do you think would be the next step? You follow medical research: You say you can make a robot move. You can make a human hand move. What would you do next?

You say, "Wow, they're getting brains connected to run things." You have to begin to think either like doctors or like security and intelligence people, right?

Can you actually send and receive sensory information, like 'The Matrix'?

Dr [Craig] Venter's work is, in my view the equivalent of the development of nuclear weapons, when you realize that he created life in a cell, back in 2010. I don't know if people are familiar with his work, but this technology paired with something called CRISPR, which is like an editing software for genes, makes a number of things immediately available.

What he did is he programmed yeast cells to produce anything he wanted: They can produce perfume. They can produce petroleum. They can produce any peptide, anything we program the DNA to do and it's in the living cell.

So in medicine, the goal in medicine now is to be able to do designer medicine and therapy. If we can design a cell to get into your body and release the right product for you, you won't be losing half the drugs you take through your liver, when you swallow a pill and it gets digested.

These can be inserted into you through the hypospray needles, almost like Dr McCoy on Star Trek, getting the hypospray. It just blasts, now plasmids into your squamous cells. But Venter was able to do that and has the patent on the technology. But you can engineer anything.

You can engineer a thing that would only kill one person in the world.

VIDEO REPEATS:

You can engineer a thing that would only kill one person in the world.

It's how it's done. You put in a specific gene slicing. You program what you like. You put it in the cell and it can reproduce and make as much as you like.

Dr Astrid Stuckelberger: It's very interesting. When people are not convinced, I show them, "Go and see this and you will understand already a bit. Go and see the [CDC's] 'Pandemic Preparedness for Zombies'. You will understand.


WHITE PAPER: "Preparedness 101: Zombie Pandemic" - Orig. Pub. in 2011 by the Centers for Disease Control
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6023

Go and see that the ID is in the body of people who are dead and even in the cemetery, you know:


VIDEO: "Internet of Dead Bodies" - Pub. Jan 5, 2024 by ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net
And go and see the autopsy that what they're taking out of the blood is something like catsup. But nobody's really describing it:
https://rumble.com/v45e3v0-internet-of-dead-bodies.html

VIDEO: "Embalmer Richard Hirschman Reveals Novel Clotting in 65% of Cases" - Pub. Feb 8, 2022 by ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.net
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/emb...n-65-of-cases/

And I suspect they're afraid to say really what it is, because they don't know. Because, when there are two or three scientists who said something very interesting that goes with this AI science plasma, going around. It's that there is a parasite, as an egg:
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/cri...sm-identified/

If you put it at the temperature of the body under microscope, it develops and the egg bursts out and..
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/sho...vial-contents/

VIDEO: "SHOCKING: Dr. Carrie Madej Releases FIRST LOOK at Pfizer Vial Contents" - Pub. Oct 21, 2021 by ForbiddenKnowledgeTv.net
There's a lot to go and seek and to understand the causality of causality and not only talk of this mRNA! And I'm fed up of this mRNA! It's a messenger! It's a lot more!

I got censored in Stockholm in a conference because I said, "Go and look at the genome-editing document that WHO produced, because this is important."

But the cause of the cause is a synthetic injection with nanocircuits that go on with 5G. It's been evidenced by experts who recognized and did it, that it is a nanocircuit.

It's beyond what doctors know, what normal scientists know. And we have to get every engineer in – or veterans who have who know anything about nanoparticles and nanotech – to come and help us to understand what's going on, because we have to know how to detach this from the body and clean.

Sabrina Wallace gets into the latest detail of all of this, which I will cover in my next post, but here's a teaser:

"The cyber physical backbone with the IEEE was already in place in 2017. And Alison McDowell told you to write letters to the stakeholders, the people who pay their bills. You don't pay their bills – so, what do they care about your letters?!

Spartacus, March 25th, 2025: "It's a far more plausible scenario than people would think. AI don't have to run on computers alone. That's just one substrate. Biology is another substrate that AI can run on."

Yeah, human bodies make great antennas and the most powerful quantum computer is between your ears, said Our Divine Lady of the Red Phone.

DNA computers, lipid-based logic gates, chemical computation through receptor-ligand interactions, etc. 2006 paper entitled, "Towards Computing with Proteins". That's molecular communication, right now, today, and since 2014, commercially:


WHITE PAPER: "Towards Computing with Proteins" - Pub. April 1, 2006 by PubMed
To quote the abstract:

"We discuss how to design protein molecules that would serve as the best computational element by functioning as a nanological gate, utilizing DNA tags for recognition, phosphorylation, exonuclease reactions for information processing."

You're a walking hard drive. DNA steganography. That's what I said."

ForbiddenNews Substack is a reader-supported publication.


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6pj149/?pub=4

[Vangelo]

Biden Administration Concealed Congressionally Mandated Report on Earliest Suspected American COVID Cases
Seven U.S. servicemembers contracted COVID-19-like symptoms in Wuhan in October 2019
Andrew Kerr _ _ April 8, 2025

source: freebeacon.com

Seven Americans may have contracted COVID-19 in Wuhan in October 2019, several months before the reported start of the pandemic, according to a bombshell military report obtained by the Washington Free Beacon that the Biden administration concealed from the public.

The December 2022 report, which the Biden administration was required by law to release to the public over two years ago but didn’t, reveals for the first time that seven U.S. military service members contracted COVID-19-like symptoms during or after their participation in the World Military Games in Wuhan in October 2019—contradicting the Biden administration’s public claims in 2021 that there was no evidence that any American participants contracted the virus at those games. The revelation adds to a mounting body of evidence that the virus was circulating in Wuhan for months before China disclosed it to the world in December 2019 and further bolsters the growing consensus that it could have leaked into the human population from a Chinese lab.

The 2022 National Defense Authorization Act required the Biden administration to make its report on the 2019 Wuhan World Military Games "publicly available on an internet website in a searchable format" by the summer of 2022. Though the Biden administration transmitted copies of the two-page report to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees in December 2022, it didn’t see the light of day until sometime in late March when the Trump administration quietly uploaded it to a Defense Department website.

The potential COVID-19 illnesses from the American participants in the Wuhan World Military Games appear to have been a closely guarded secret of the Defense Department. Chinese authorities have suggested since as early as February 2020 that America could have unleashed COVID-19 into Wuhan through their participation in the World Military Games. Former Biden Defense Department spokesman John Kirby told the Washington Post in June 2021 that the military had "no knowledge" of any COVID-19 infections among the troops that participated in those games.

The first Trump administration issued similar statements regarding the Wuhan games. In June 2020, the Pentagon told the Prospect that it did not test any of the American troops that participated in the games because they were held "prior to the reported outbreak."

The games were held within close proximity of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where Chinese scientists, backed by U.S. taxpayer funds, conducted risky gain-of-function research on the same sort of bat coronaviruses that caused the pandemic. That research, which was supported by former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci, "almost certainly caused COVID-19," Rutgers University professor of chemical biology Richard Ebright told the Free Beacon.

The American military athletes traveled to and from Wuhan via Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, according to the Prospect, which noted that Washington was one of the earliest COVID-19 hotspots in the country.

The report speculated that other respiratory infections could have caused the COVID-like symptoms exhibited by the seven service members and that there was no "statistically significant difference" in COVID-like cases at the military bases those soldiers were stationed at compared to those without them. The seven soldiers all recovered from their symptoms within six days.

The Pentagon did not disclose when it discovered the potential illnesses. The Pentagon declined to comment

Knowledge that U.S. troops may have contracted COVID-19 in Wuhan during the October 2019 games may have been well received by U.S. allies. Military athletes from Germany, France, Italy, and Luxembourg who competed in the October 2019 games also reported coming down with COVID-19-like symptoms during their stay in Wuhan, which they described as a "ghost town," the Daily Mail reported.

Ebright, one of the most prominent academic proponents of the theory that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, said he was appalled that the Biden administration concealed crucial information about the first potential American cases of the virus from the public amid the ongoing debate over the pandemic’s origins.

"It is an outrage that the Biden White House and the 118th Congress Senate and House Armed Services Committees did not publicly release this information when it became available in 2022, but, instead, withheld this information for the duration of their terms," Ebright told the Free Beacon.

"This new information strengthens U.S. and allied intelligence data indicating that COVID-19 was circulating in Wuhan in October-November 2019, U.S. and allied intelligence data indicating that researchers working with genetically enhanced SARS viruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology contracted COVID-19 in October-November 2019, and phylogenomic data indicating that the virus that causes COVID-19 entered humans in July-November 2019."

Ebright’s sentiment was shared by Sen. Joni Ernst (R., Iowa), who said the report’s findings discredit the theory that COVID-19 originated from a Wuhan wet market in December 2019.

"Taxpayers deserve to know the truth about COVID-19 origins, but the Biden administration concealed this information from the American people for years," Ernst told the Free Beacon. "This report should have been made public immediately and not restricted to Washington insiders. If Americans visiting Wuhan were potentially infected with the COVID-19 virus in October 2019, those claiming the pandemic began in a wet market just two months later would be completely off base."

Congressional Republicans have long since concluded that the 2019 Wuhan World Military Games served as "one of the earliest super spreader events" of the pandemic, with House Foreign Affairs Republicans issuing its findings on the matter in August 2021.

The Defense Department uploaded the report sometime in late March to a section of its website dedicated to "quality-of-life" issues for military service members and their families. The Wuhan World Military Games report is sandwiched between two separate reports on military spouses obtaining occupational licenses.

Several federal agencies, including the CIA, FBI, and Energy Department, say the COVID-19 pandemic most likely originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1910328797871714578

The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox

Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Clinical Trials Finds 3 to 5 Times the Odds of Harm Over Benefit

Pfizer:
• 10.1 per 10,000 excess risk of serious adverse events.
• 2.3 per 10,000 reduction in C19 hospitalizations.

Moderna:
• 15.1 per 10,000 excess risk of serious adverse events.
• 6.4 per 10,000 reduction in C19 hospitalizations.

Dan Skorbach: "So more people suffered serious harms from the vaccine than the number of people who actually got protection against hospitalization."

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/annvandersteel/status/1911719851338432647

st

See new posts
Conversation
Ann Vandersteel™️
@annvandersteel
🚨🚨🚨 ARREST FAUCI NOW 🚨🚨🚨

🔥💉 BREAKING: mRNA "Vaccines" Linked to 30-Year Life Expectancy DROP 🔥

A bombshell peer-reviewed study has just rocked the global scientific community.

🚨 Lifespan slashed by 37% in people who received 2+ doses of the COVID mRNA shot.
That’s 29-30 years wiped off your life — in America, that’s going from 78 years to just 49.6.
Published in the MDPI Medical Journal by Prof. Marco Alessandria and his team of Italian researchers, this study confirms the worst fears of doctors silenced for years:

👉🏼 The mRNA injections are not “safe and effective” They’re toxic and terminal.

This isn’t misinformation. This is a scientific death sentence backed by real data. And the global medical elite knew.
Now we know.

➡️ You were never supposed to survive this.

Demand justice. Name names. Nuremberg 2.0 must begin.


https://x.com/annvandersteel/status/1911722181781864718

Ann Vandersteel™️
@annvandersteel
·
3h
Sauce:

https://t.co/RPoiwxx4YG

[Delight]

Mind Blowing CV19 Bioweapon Vax Still on Market – Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
4/15/2025
Greg Hunter's USAWatchdog.com

There is NOTHING good at all in any of the vaccine program. They are not effective. They are NOT safe. The MRNA platform is next level death jab.


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6pyarn/?pub=4

[Tintin]

Perhaps this should have its own thread but I do have to say that this is especially alarming and one assumes for any new therapeutic interventions in the pipeline. Placing this here as it may qualify as a pre-crime scenario. If one was ever wary of injections, at any time, this will do nothing to dissuade.

Please be very careful out there

--------------------------

"SaRNA turns cells into perpetual protein factories—but what happens when those cells should be performing other vital functions? What happens when this genetic machinery infiltrates delicate tissues like the brain, heart, or reproductive organs? The assumption that saRNA will behave in a predictable, localized manner is wildly naive."

Source: BeyondBio / John Catanzaro

The Reckless Gamble of Self-Amplifying RNA: A Runaway Experiment with No Off Switch

In the ever-growing arms race of genetic engineering, a new and deeply concerning player has emerged: self-amplifying RNA (saRNA). Unlike conventional mRNA shots, which at least carry the pretense of controlled dosing, saRNA introduces a self-replicating genetic mechanism into human cells—a mechanism that has no inherent safeguards, no patient-specific oversight, and no clear understanding of the long-term ramifications.

This is not just another chapter in the reckless rush toward biotech dominance; it is a blatant, high-stakes experiment on the human genome, masquerading as innovation. As we have already observed in the mRNA COVID vaccines, the risks are far from hypothetical.

The premise of saRNA is deceptively simple: instead of merely injecting a blueprint for protein production (as in traditional mRNA shots), which mounting evidence points toward rogue transcription, saRNA also carries the molecular machinery to make copies of itself intentionally. It does this by encoding a replicase enzyme, which hijacks cellular processes to continuously produce more saRNA molecules—ensuring that the body keeps generating foreign proteins long after the initial injection.

Think about that for a moment. This is not a controlled, single-shot therapy. This is a biological machine set loose inside your cells with no definitive stop signal. Imagine handing someone a single-page instruction sheet versus handing them a self-replicating printing press that churns out endless copies of that sheet—whether they need it or not.

Proponents of saRNA tout it as a way to “improve vaccine efficiency,” claiming it allows for lower doses and longer-lasting effects. But let’s cut through the marketing fluff and acknowledge the harsh reality: this is an uncontrolled genetic intervention with profound risks.

1. Loss of Dose Control

Unlike traditional mRNA, which degrades over time, saRNA amplifies itself indefinitely. The amount of foreign protein produced is not dictated by the initial dose but by the unpredictable replication rate within the body. How much is too much? At what point does the immune system become overwhelmed? No one can answer these questions because no one is monitoring patient-specific responses in real-time.

2. Cellular Hijacking Without an “Off” Switch

SaRNA turns cells into perpetual protein factories—but what happens when those cells should be performing other vital functions? What happens when this genetic machinery infiltrates delicate tissues like the brain, heart, or reproductive organs? The assumption that saRNA will behave in a predictable, localized manner is wildly naive.

3. Unchecked Inflammation and Autoimmunity

Continuous foreign protein production means constant aberrant signaling and immune system activation. Chronic inflammation is not a minor side effect—it is a gateway to autoimmune disorders, immune exhaustion, and long-term damage to the body’s regulatory systems; by forcing the body to engage in perpetual battle, saRNA risks dismantling the natural balance of immune function.

We have already seen this happen with mRNA COVID vaccines, which have been linked to myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clotting disorders, neurological complications, and immune dysregulation. Many individuals who received these shots have suffered long-term health consequences—some even resulting in death. Now, with saRNA, we are looking at a more aggressive, less controllable version of the same technology.

4. Potential for Genetic Disruption

The claim that saRNA “does not alter DNA” is a convenient half-truth. While saRNA itself is not directly inserted into the genome, human cells contain endogenous reverse transcriptases—enzymes capable of integrating foreign RNA sequences into DNA. The long-term consequences of this interaction remain completely unstudied.

5. The Utter Lack of Patient-Specific Surveillance

The most glaring flaw in the push for saRNA technology is the absence of real-time molecular surveillance. If you were introducing a self-replicating genetic program into human cells, wouldn’t you want precise, patient-specific monitoring to track its behavior? Wouldn’t you demand a way to shut it off if something goes wrong?

Instead, we see the same one-size-fits-all approach that characterized the disastrous rollout of mRNA shots. There is no mechanism for tracking where saRNA spreads, no way to measure its long-term persistence and no contingency plan for unintended consequences.

Even now, mRNA COVID vaccine injuries are being dismissed, ignored, or downplayed. Those suffering from heart damage, neurological disorders, and immune collapse are left without answers. And now, biotech firms are steamrolling forward with an even more dangerous, self-replicating version of the same flawed concept.

6. A Reckless Experiment Disguised as Innovation

This is not a well-controlled, precision-engineered therapy. It is a biological gamble, played out on the most complex system known to man—the human body—without adequate safety nets.

The same voices that dismissed concerns about mRNA safety are now doubling down, pushing an even less predictable, more dangerous technology. They assure us that “preliminary results look good” while conveniently ignoring the gaping holes in long-term safety data.

The Bottom Line

Self-amplifying RNA is not a medical breakthrough; it is an uncontrolled genetic intrusion. It represents the next phase in a reckless biotech experiment that prioritizes market expansion over patient safety. Until we see rigorous, long-term, patient-specific safety studies—not just industry-funded propaganda—this technology must be viewed for what it is: a high-risk, open-ended biological intervention with no clear exit strategy.

The mRNA COVID vaccine rollout has already shown us what happens when genetic technology is rushed to market without adequate oversight: millions of people around the world now suffer from chronic health complications that were initially dismissed as “rare” or “coincidental.”

Now, with saRNA, the stakes are even higher. This is not science. It is an intentional disregard for biological integrity, and the consequences could be catastrophic.

---------

References:

Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41417-022-00435-8

Title: Next generation self-replicating RNA vectors for vaccines and immunotherapies

PNAS: https://www.pnas.org/doi/epub/10.1073/pnas.2402649121
Title: RNA life on the edge of catastrophe

Edit to add: see also onawah's post on the The Depopulation Plan thread

[onawah]

PREP Act Brief: "License to Kill" must be repealed
A collection of articles for ease of educating your friends, family, doctors and legislators. Please sign the petition to repeal the PREP Act linked in the post.
Sasha Latypova
Apr 21, 2025
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p...m_medium=email
Sign the petition: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...RqpJA/viewform

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"This is a video...

(Rumble video at the end of this post)

...I recorded with James Roguski, explaining the monstrosity that is the PREP Act and the reasons why we are focusing on the campaign to educate the public about it and ultimately repeal it:
Brief: The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act.
1. Purpose - liability shield for those who cause death and injury during arbitrarily declared “public health emergencies”:

The PREP Act (2005) is federal legislation designed to provide immunity from liability for certain individuals and entities involved in the development, manufacture, distribution, and administration of "covered countermeasures" during a declared public health emergency. [Wiki]

The Act is activated upon the declaration of a Public Health Emergency (PHE) by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Such declaration is entirely arbitrary, based solely on the HHS Scy opinion that requires no justification and is non-reviewable by the judiciary branch, nor by Congress.

Nothing to declare

Pandemics are arbitrary declarations by HHS Secretary, requiring no evidence

Declaration of a pandemic sets up a legal cage

“Weaponized pathogens” cannot cause pandemics, and Ralph Baric explains

Fraudulent “science” of weaponized viruses

Pfizer failed to make animals sick from SARS-Cov-2

Pandemics are faked: the DOD script and Dutch/Erasmus script

Pandemics are a government-pharma racket - Col Matt Hepburn (DARPA)

Biodefense is a global pandemic racketeering enterprise

Natural epidemics are explained by lack of sanitation and anaphylaxis by animal/insect bites

Why are they doing it - eugenics documentary

The PREP Act is currently invoked for countermeasures related to COVID-19, Marburg virus, Ebola, Zika, avian flu, RSV, monkeypox, anthrax, and smallpox. There are no pandemics or epidemics of these diseases in the United States, therefore, these declaration have no basis in reality, nor do they serve any public health interests:

Covid emergency extended to Dec 2029

Marburg and Ebola


These are fake “emergencies” currently declared by HHS. There are no pandemics or epidemics of any of these diseases in the US. These declarations are in place solely to spend taxpayers’ money on purchasing unregulated and falsely labeled poisons, force them on duped civilians and military servicemembers, and then avoid any liability for death and injuries caused.

Due Diligence and Art is a reader-supported publication. 2. Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for deploying “Covered Countermeasures”:

The PREP Act enables the “non-investigational” (outside of the law, regulations and liability-free) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) pathway for drugs, vaccines and other medical products:

Section 564 of FD&CA

EUA pathway allows for the bypassing of ALL regulatory requirements for clinical trials, manufacturing quality, safety, and labeling due to non-enforcement of those laws for countermeasures under arbitrarily-declared pandemic emergency:

FDA Guidance on EUA Countermeasures

Pharmaceutical law/regs do not apply to EUA Countermeasures

Nobody knows what is in the vials

Under 21 USC 360bbb-3(k), the "use" of EUA products "shall not constitute clinical investigation," making informed consent inapplicable/meaningless:

EUA Countermeasures are non-investigational

FDA and DOD removed informed consent for covid shots

Peter Marks testifies that FDA removed informed consent for covid shots

Q&A re EUA Countermeasures

The definition of "covered countermeasures" is vague and includes vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics, treatments, and other items. This definition can even extend to targeting technologies (mandates for false-positive PCR or lateral flow tests), as well as sophisticated informational weaponry, such as coordinated media lies, propaganda and censorship.

Memo re EUA Countermeasures, applicable law

PREP Act shields hospital murder protocols as long as HHS orders are followed

3. Liability Protection:

“Covered Persons”: the PREP Act provides a significant liability shield to a wide range of individuals and entities, including manufacturers, distributors, program planners, qualified persons (like pharmacists and pharmacy technicians), and healthcare providers.

As long as these "covered persons" follow the orders of HHS/DOD and comply with protocols, they are generally exempt from civil liability for injuries or deaths resulting from the administration or use of covered countermeasures.

This liability shield applies regardless of the place of employment, and covered persons may be "deemed US Government employees for purposes of this work".

This protection is even described as potentially covering "bribery, coercion, assault and murder" if they occur within the context of a PREP Act declared emergency and related activities.

While criminal liability is technically not shielded by the PREP Act, the criminal pathway is available only if the state brings criminal charges first and wins:

Analysis of possible state-level criminal action under PREP

Criminal statutes relevant to covid crimes by state

Products authorized under EUA during a PHE and any products used to treat the injury resulting from use of EUA countermeasures can be considered "countermeasures" under the PREP Act, removing liability and enabling further injuries to the public:

All vaccines can be deemed liability-free “countermeasures” while any declaration of emergency is extended

4. Department of Defense (DOD) Involvement:

Operation Warp Speed was a public-private partnership under military command (DOD was the Chief Operating Officer) reporting to the National Security Council. The decisions about covid response policy were made in secret and remain classified to date.

Covid Dossier

Intent to Harm

The hidden hand - NSC and the Military

DOD/CIA linked Resilience manufactures mRNA vaccines

Why DOD partnered with HHS

The role of DOD and their co-investors in covid countermeasures

Catherine Austin Fitts on DOD

Information from a leaked audio recording from AstraZeneca shows that the DOD declared COVID-19 a "national security threat" as early as February 4, 2020, without any factual justification. This timing aligns with the retroactive declaration of the emergency under PREP Act for COVID-19.

DOD pushed pandemic actions/money ahead of POTUS (Tump 1.0)

Contracts for these countermeasures are managed by the DOD and may describe the products as having "civil and military application".

DOD contracts for covid countermeasures and here, here, and here

Moderna DOD contracts and here

State pharmacy distribution laws do not apply to EUA Countermeasures

6. No Legal Recourse for the Injured:

The PREP Act severely limits the ability of individuals injured or the families of those who died after using a covered countermeasure to seek legal remedies.

Lawsuits can only be filed in a three-judge court in the District of Columbia.

Plaintiffs must prove direct causality between the countermeasure and the injury or death AND demonstrate "willful misconduct" on the part of the defendant.

Even if causality and willful misconduct are proven, the defendant is not liable if they followed HHS/DOD orders and reported the injury or death to these agencies within seven days.

To date, covid shot manufacturers, hospitals and doctors participating in murder protocols, the DOD and other defendants successfully invoked "sovereign immunity" as a defense against lawsuits related to PREP Act countermeasures. Only one court, NC Supreme Court found that some state constitutional rights are not preempted by PREP Act.

7. No Oversight:

The PREP Act strips Congress of its authority to oversee or terminate emergency declarations made unilaterally by the HHS Secretary.

It also removes the authority of federal courts to review or nullify these declarations and pre-empts the jurisdiction of the states.

8. Relevant Litigation Discussed on this Substack:

North Carolina Supreme Court finds PREP Act does not preempt constitutional claims

Maine Supreme Court finds PREP Act shields those who inject children against parental consent

DOD/pharmas use claims of “sovereign immunity” to dismiss wrongful death lawsuits (Watts v DOD)

Brook Jackson v Pfizer, whistleblower lawsuit under False Claims Act and here

DOJ confirms that fraud and resulting deaths and injuries from covid shots are part of the US public health policy (Brook Jackson case)

TX v Pfizer - dismissed affirming state law preemption by PREP Act

KS v Pfizer

Dressen v AZ - contractual claims not preempted by PREP, and here

Analysis of constitutional issues of PREP Act by attorney Ray Flores

9. What can you do to dismantle PREP Act and help the victims:

Pray.

Share this information widely, attribution is nice but not necessary.

States can nullify PREP Act as it violates the rights of states and their citizens - please talk to your legislators.

US Congress can repeal the PREP Act as unconstitutional [Chemerinsky opinion], [Biden Clinton quotes], [other ref]

Sign Petition to Repeal Prep Act

James Roguski is organizing the work on this petition. Please make sure to include your congressional district (for US residents). You can sign the petition even if you are not a US resident. We appreciate your support!

Please join me calling on HHS Secretary RFK Jr to terminate the contrived emergency declarations, closing the window for lethal/damaging products and acts of deception on the public:

Open Letter to the HHS Secretary, RFK Jr.
Open Letter to the HHS Secretary, RFK Jr.
Sasha Latypova
·
Feb 26
Read full story
Do not comply, become vaccine-hostile, do not take any countermeasures nor any PCR tests. Avoid establishment healthcare as much as possible (they track your vaccination status), shield your children from from pediatricians that push poison:

Katherine Watt on habeas corpus and communicable disease control

Katherine Watt - comprehensive set of tools to dismantle evil law including PREP Act

In conclusion:
Katherine Watt refers to the framework created by the PREP Act and related legislation as the "American Domestic Bioterrorism Program", arguing that it legalized actions that were previously illegal under the guise of public health. This constitutes an overthrow of the U.S. Constitution.

Memo prepared for Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) in December 2022

PREP Act creates a "license to kill" with covered weaponry/”countermeasures” by covered persons, as long as the perpetrators claim they are acting in an emergency in the interests of public health and HHS’ orders are followed.

PREP Act must be repealed. Yet, not a single Congress person speaks about it. I don’t know when/if material progress toward this goal will be made. In the meantime, we must educate everyone around us about this atrocity. The problem is that most people, even those who are now awake to the vaccine and hospital murders still think that “if fraud can be proven” than the perps can be prosecuted. The fraud has not only been definitively proven, it hasn’t been really hidden to begin with and it is a key feature of weaponized “public health”. Fraud and resulting deaths have been acknowledged by the Department of Justice who stated in court that they are part of the US public health policy.

For further reading:
In-depth analysis of the PREP Act and Countermeasures Law by Katherine Watt (see Book 2, also liked in the article below):


Bailiwick News
Bailiwick reporting organized by subject
Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law…
Read more
19 days ago · 90 likes · Katherine Watt "

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6pzlwp/?pub=4

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/rustyrockets/status/1914105299176214816

Russell Brand
@rustyrockets

Rishi Sunak, later UK Prime Minister, invested in Moderna when it had just 10 employees—before the pandemic. As Chancellor, he approved vaccine deals. As PM, he signed a 10-year partnership with Moderna.

RESULT? The UK government profited from a crisis it controlled.

Evil.

[Ravenlocke]

Text:
Slovakia finds ‘UNDISCLOSED substances’ in COVID vaccines

PM Fico says manufacturers hid what was inside

Also detected: ‘exceptionally high’ DNA levels

Would you want this investigated in your country?

https://x.com/RT_com/status/1914772403202277459

https://x.com/PeterSweden7/status/1900590674954580463

https://x.com/helgy2/status/1914813780124487687

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/JoshuaHosler/status/1914702215547171052

Joshua T. Hosler
@JoshuaHosler

This is Julie Gerberding. She was the CDC director who ordered CDC researchers to destroy evidence from a CDC study that proved the MMR jab causes Autism and other NDD associated with brain damage and brain inflammation.

This is Julie Gerberding. She left the CDC to take a job as president of Merck's vaccine division. Merck is the maker of the MMR jab.

What do you call it when corporations get in bed with state authority and collude to amass power and subvert the will of the people?




When it's Pharma, I call it pharma-fascism





https://x.com/DiedSuddenly_/status/1914862355256693061

Died Suddenly
@DiedSuddenly_
·
12h
In 2008, CNN aired a segment about a Hannah Poling, a girl who contracted autism as a toddler due to vaccines.

Her father, a neurologist, claimed that the HHS ADMITTED her autism came from vaccines 👇