+ Reply to Thread
Page 108 of 117 FirstFirst 1 8 58 98 108 117 LastLast
Results 2,141 to 2,160 of 2337

Thread: Vaccine Crimes

  1. Link to Post #2141
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,596
    Thanks
    77,683
    Thanked 112,919 times in 12,436 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/catturd2/status/1915025171041132698




    Catturd ™
    @catturd2

    criminal.


    Quote
    David Kurten
    @davidkurten
    ·
    7h
    The FDA has now approved Ivermectin for 'Covid' - 5 years and 5,500,000,000 experimental injections too late.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  2. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd April 2025), ClearWater (24th April 2025), Ewan (24th April 2025), Harmony (24th April 2025), lisalu (23rd April 2025), Yoda (23rd April 2025)

  3. Link to Post #2142
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Sperm Being Replaced with Spike Protein
    From the Facebook post Jimmy Miller made on the Team Kennedy site, quoting Naomi Wolf:
    Jimmy Miller
    4/22/25

    "Replaces sperm with the spike protein. Watch the video attached to this. This is why I keep posting on not having sex with those who have been jabbed. This is way more sinister than people realize.
    This ties right into the biodigital convergence. Hydra Vril Borg~ing us. Connecting us to the AI internet of things. Jabbed bodies literally resonating bluetooth codes. I'm not making this up. Research it, and not on Google. We warned you these would be bad. I used the word sinister when I posted on it over 4 years ago, and was restricted for 30 days over it. We are just now seeing how sinister it in fact is."

    https://x.com/naomirwolf/status/1914...lVgnWwuXqecXUA
    Quote Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry.
    @naomirwolf
    In the Pfizer Papers, Pfizer warns vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women but they do not say why, except that it's clear that something they fear in "exposure" to the vaccine is via sperm. This may be what Pfizer was afraid of.
    Quote
    Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)
    @CartlandDavid

    Apr 20
    Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, a German pathologist, presents an unsettling slide show revealing that in vaccinated males, the spike protein from the COVID vaccine has entirely replaced their sperm.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th April 2025), ClearWater (24th April 2025), Ewan (24th April 2025), Harmony (24th April 2025), mountain_jim (24th April 2025), Yoda (24th April 2025)

  5. Link to Post #2143
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    CDC has dismantled the Vaccine Safety Datalink
    https://x.com/HighWireTalk/status/19...lVgnWwuXqecXUA
    Quote The HighWire
    @HighWireTalk
    🚨 BREAKING:
    @ICANdecide
    attorney
    @AaronSiriSG
    reveals the CDC has dismantled the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — a critical database holding vaccine safety data from over 21 million Americans.

    The data has reportedly been handed back to HMOs and other sources, making it nearly impossible for HHS to investigate environmental causes of autism — or to conduct a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study.

    “If that wasn’t government actors doing it, it would be absolutely criminal,” says Siri.

    What do you think they’re trying to hide?
    More here: https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/i...or-the-people/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th April 2025), ClearWater (24th April 2025), Ewan (24th April 2025), Harmony (24th April 2025), Kryztian (26th April 2025), mountain_jim (24th April 2025), Yoda (24th April 2025)

  7. Link to Post #2144
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Joe Rogan Experience #2294 - Dr. Suzanne Humphries
    PowerfulJRE
    19.7M subscribers
    Mar 26, 2025

    "Dr Humphries is a conventionally educated medical doctor who was a participant in conventional hospital systems from 1989 until 2011 as an internist and nephrologist. She left her conventional hospital position in good standing, of her own volition in 2011. Since then, she’s been furthering her research into the medical literature on vaccines, immunity, history, and functional medicine. She is the author of "Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History."
    http://dissolvingillusions.com/ "



    What’s the Real Story Behind Vaccines?
    Dr. Joseph Mercola
    May 04, 2025
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...&rid=284614981

    https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...ccines-pdf.pdf

    "Story at-a-glance
    Dr. Suzanne Humphries challenges conventional vaccine narratives, arguing that improvements in sanitation and nutrition, not vaccines, were primarily responsible for declining disease rates
    Humphries' journey from kidney specialist to vaccine researcher began after noticing patterns of kidney failure in patients following flu vaccination
    The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shields vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits, prioritizing profit over rigorous safety testing
    Early vaccines contained contaminants like SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus that entered polio vaccines through production methods using monkey kidneys
    Humphries emphasizes the importance of avoiding dogmatic thinking about vaccines, advocating for open-minded examination of medical practices

    Joe Rogan recently sat down with Dr. Suzanne Humphries, co-author of "Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History," one of my favorite books on vaccines.1 I previously interviewed Humphries about how vaccine science has been misrepresented to portray them as safe and effective, when in reality they're neither.
    See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=207W1A_bJqI

    She absolutely crushed it in this Rogan interview! I honestly don't think anyone in history has laid out such a clear, convincing, and downright compelling case about the vaccine downsides. After decades of grinding away, her hard work's finally getting the spotlight it deserves, and I'm beyond thrilled to have written the forward to her fantastic book.

    Rogan also asked Humphries questions about the history, science and real impact of vaccines, and she didn't hold back with her answers. Their conversation challenges conventional narratives about vaccines, explores the efficacy of natural remedies and uncovers an important history of medicine that is often overlooked.

    The Importance of an Open Mind
    Rogan opens the episode by emphasizing a key principle: avoiding dogma. "You can't be dogmatic when you're talking about vaccines — or about anything," he says, advocating for a flexible, 360-degree perspective rather than the tunnel vision often fostered by indoctrination. Humphries agrees, noting that intentional and profitable indoctrination has shaped public perception of medical practices.

    •Beneficial practices are often unfairly dismissed — Rogan praises "Dissolving Illusions" for highlighting the use of natural remedies like cinnamon, which are often discredited as "hippie nonsense." Humphries explains that cinnamon, a powerful herb, contains significant vitamin C, a nutrient she believes underpinned the effectiveness of many traditional remedies.

    She recalls dismissing such ideas early in her career, only to later recognize their value. Garlic, too, emerges as a standout, effective against staph infections without fostering drug resistance — a stark contrast to engineered pharmaceuticals.

    •This shift in perspective — from skepticism to appreciation — mirrors a broader theme — The conventional medical establishment has a tendency to reject natural solutions in favor of standardized, profitable interventions. Humphries argues that doctors should recommend these remedies alongside conventional treatments, citing, for example, vitamin D and vitamin A as important yet underutilized tools.

    Vaccines and Vitamin A — A Hidden Connection
    The conversation pivots to a striking revelation about the measles vaccine. Humphries explains that both natural measles infection and the vaccine deplete vitamin A levels in the body. "They don't tell you that," she says, noting that post-vaccination advice often only recommends Tylenol, which she notes impairs immune response and causes "immunological disturbances."

    •The medical system prioritizes standardized procedures over holistic care — This vitamin A depletion, Humphries argues, should prompt vitamin A supplementation to be recommended along with the measles shot, but this advice is absent from standard protocols. This point underscores a recurring critique of the medical system focusing on disease care instead of health care.

    •Variability in vaccine production contributes to inconsistent outcomes — This problem is made worse by legal immunity granted to vaccine manufacturers. Rogan probes this further, asking if the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shields vaccine companies from lawsuits, fueled this variability.

    Humphries traces the precedent to the 1976 swine flu vaccine fiasco, where injuries forced the government to absorb liability, setting the stage for 1986's broader measure.

    •Post-1986, vaccine makers prioritized profit over safety — They introduced vaccine enhancers, or adjuvants, like aluminum and, eventually, mRNA technology. The legal protection afforded under the 1986 Act, she contends, allowed companies to prioritize profit over rigorous safety testing, a theme that reverberates throughout their discussion.

    The Polio Paradox — Vaccines or Sanitation?
    Polio remains the poster child for vaccine success, but Humphries challenges this narrative with a detailed historical analysis. Rogan asks what caused polio's decline, questioning the vaccine's role. Humphries responds that the facts don't align with popular belief. "Polio is still here," she asserts, rebranded as conditions like Guillain-Barré syndrome — diagnostic criteria shifted post-vaccine to mask its persistence.

    •Environmental factors — pesticides like DDT, arsenic and lead — are primary culprits — DDT production, she notes, mirrored polio outbreaks, with rural communities exposed through livestock dipping and crop spraying. "Arsenic causes the exact same spinal pathology," she says, citing medical references that link these toxins to symptoms attributed to polio.

    •Up to 95% to 99% of polio cases are asymptomatic — This suggests it's a virus naturally present and benign in healthy individuals. Humphries cites a study of the Xavante Indians in South America, where nearly all tested had immunity to polio strains without paralysis, implying robust natural immunity negated its threat.

    Rogan marvels at this, pointing out that viruses often weaken on their own and become less harmful over time — yet human interventions, like the 1916 Rockefeller lab's engineered polio strain, made it more deadly.

    •The threat of vaccine-derived polio — This is particularly related to oral vaccines still used in India and Israel. These live strains, she says, caused more paralytic cases than they prevented in early trials, a fact obscured by redefined diagnostics and propaganda. This complexity dismantles the simplistic "vaccine eradicated polio" story, pointing instead to sanitation, nutrition and reduced toxin exposure as key drivers of its decline.

    Smallpox — A Tale of Sanitation and Suffering
    Smallpox, another supposed vaccine triumph, faces similar scrutiny. Humphries describes its vaccine as a crude concoction of animal pus — often from cows, horses or cadavers — mixed with glycerin and dubbed "pure lymph."

    •Far from pure, these vaccines harbored bacteria and fungi — Contamination persisted into the 20th century. Rogan is incredulous: "Can you believe that fairy tale?" he asks, as Humphries details how these vaccines spread disease, including tuberculosis, a side effect she dubs "the white plague."

    •Public health conditions amplified smallpox's toll — Rogan paints a vivid picture: streets awash with feces, no running water and rampant malnutrition. Humphries agrees, noting that in the late 1600s, smallpox was "one of the easiest diseases to treat" with supportive care. The Industrial Revolution worsened conditions, cramming people into filthy slums where disease thrived.

    Death rates, she argues, plummeted not due to vaccines but alongside improvements in water, shelter and labor laws. Death rates from conditions like diarrhea, which had no vaccine, also declined during this time.

    •Doctors of the era often worsened outcomes with toxic treatments — Mercury, arsenic and bloodletting were prescribed until vomiting or diarrhea ensued. These "purges," meant to expel illness, instead debilitated patients. Yet, natural remedies like apple cider vinegar showed promise, with historical reports of doctors using it to prevent smallpox infection — a practice echoing its modern resurgence for gut health.

    Natural Remedies Reclaimed
    The dismissal of natural remedies frustrates both Rogan and Humphries. "The hippies seem to have got it right," Rogan quips. Humphries recounts treating tetanus — a vaccine-targeted disease — with vitamin C and wound care, achieving better outcomes than in vaccinated cases. Studies, she says, show vitamin C prevents tetanus in rabbits if administered early, challenging the vaccine's necessity.

    •Breast milk emerges as a nutritional powerhouse — This food is rich in stem cells, immune factors and memory T-cells that confer cellular immunity. Humphries laments its replacement by formula, a profitable industry that downplays these benefits. Rogan agrees, decrying the arrogance of assuming artificial substitutes match nature's design.

    •Vitamins A, D and C recur as unsung heroes — Humphries ties vitamin A deficiency to vaccine side effects, vitamin D to immune resilience and vitamin C deficiency to hospital-acquired scurvy and more. "Most people are walking around with subclinical scurvy," she warns, worsened by stress, smoking and poor diets — conditions vaccines can't fix.

    The Dark Side of Vaccine Production
    How do contaminants like SV40, a cancer-causing monkey virus, end up in vaccines? Humphries explains the process: vaccines require living tissue — rotten meat for tetanus, monkey kidneys for polio, E. coli for COVID-19 mRNA shots.

    SV40, harmless in monkeys, infiltrated polio vaccines via African green monkey kidneys, and remained undetected until Dr. Bernice Eddy flagged it in the 1950s. Eddy's warnings were ignored and suppressed, and contaminated stocks persisted into the 1990s.

    •Now transmissible among humans, SV40 enhances cancer-promoting genes — It also inhibits cancer-suppressing genes, driving kidney, brain and lung tumors. Humphries links its introduction to rising cancer rates.

    Rogan is stunned: "How could they keep injecting that into people?" Humphries cites suppression — "any doubts ... must not be allowed to exist" — and profit motives, noting research into SV40's long-term effects was axed despite clear correlations.

    •COVID shots contain compounds that amplify side effects — These effects include blood clots and stem cell loss in placentas. These issues went unreported amid media silence. This opacity, Humphries argues, reflects a system that prioritizes industry over inquiry.

    A Doctor's Awakening
    Humphries' journey from kidney doctor to advocate began with the 2008-2009 flu vaccine, which she linked to kidney failure in her patients. "We're not told to take a vaccine history," she says, yet patterns emerged. Many patients experienced high blood pressure and dialysis post-vaccination. Her requests to delay shots for chemotherapy patients were rebuffed, sparking her research into polio, smallpox and beyond.

    •Humphries went on to co-author "Dissolving Illusions" — The book was self-published after multiple rejections. The book, now in eight languages, challenges vaccine efficacy with statistics showing death rates dropped before widespread vaccination, driven by improved sanitation and nutrition. Threats followed, but she remains undeterred, determined to spread the word.

    •Rogan, once a vaccine advocate, credits Humphries' book with shattering his illusions — "I would have told you vaccines saved us from polio," he admits, now seeing propaganda's power. Humphries, meanwhile, urges a return to healing's roots — nutrition, natural remedies and patient-centered care.

    •This conversation isn't anti-science; it's a call for true science — It's time for open, unbiased debate, unshackled from profit and dogma. Humphries invites us to question, explore and reclaim health through knowledge, not blind trust. For more, visit dissolvingillusions.com, where Humphries' work continues to challenge and enlighten.

    FAQs About Vaccines
    Q: What is the main argument against the conventional narrative of vaccines?

    A: The widely accepted belief that vaccines are solely responsible for the decline of diseases like polio and smallpox is oversimplified. Improved sanitation, better nutrition and natural remedies played significant roles in reducing disease rates.

    Q: How does vitamin A relate to vaccines, particularly the measles vaccine?

    A: Both natural measles infection and the measles vaccine deplete vitamin A levels in the body, which may lead to negative health effects. Humphries highlights that this depletion is rarely mentioned in standard medical advice, which often limits post-vaccination recommendations to Tylenol. She argues that vitamin A supplementation should be advised alongside the measles vaccine to support immune health, a practice currently overlooked.

    Q: What are the concerns about vaccine production and legal immunity?

    A: Variability in vaccine production results in inconsistent safety and efficacy outcomes. The legal immunity granted to vaccine manufacturers through the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which protects them from lawsuits, is also problematic. This legal shield has allowed vaccine manufacturers to prioritize innovation and profit over thorough safety testing, putting public health at risk.

    Q: What are some of the issues with smallpox vaccines?

    A: Early smallpox vaccines were crude, made from animal pus and often contaminated with bacteria and fungi, spreading diseases like tuberculosis. Smallpox declined primarily due to improvements in sanitation, living conditions and nutrition — not the vaccine.

    Q: What is SV40 and how did it end up in vaccines?

    A: SV40 is a cancer-causing monkey virus that contaminated polio vaccines in the 1950s and 1960s. It entered the vaccines because they were produced using monkey kidneys, and the virus went undetected until later flagged by Dr. Bernice Eddy. Despite warnings, contaminated vaccines were used for years, contributing to increased cancer rates. This is as example of flaws in vaccine production and oversight. "

    - Sources and References
    1 YouTube, Joe Rogan Experience #2294, Dr. Suzanne Humphries March 27, 2025
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th May 2025), ClearWater (5th May 2025), Ewan (5th May 2025), Harmony (5th May 2025), Ioneo (21st May 2025), meat suit (7th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), ronny (7th May 2025), ThePythonicCow (5th May 2025), Yoda (5th May 2025)

  9. Link to Post #2145
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Secret Recordings: The Real Peter Marks – An Immersive Timeline is LIVE
    Unreleased Documents. Exclusive Footage. Unfiltered Truth
    Informed Consent Action Network
    info.icandecide.org
    5/6/25



    "On March 28, 2025, Peter Marks declared his resignation from the FDA, effective April 5, 2025. The architect of Operation Warp Speed has stepped down.

    And now, what he hoped would never be revealed has been meticulously documented and outlined for the public to read, listen to, and determine for themselves what Marks’ involvement in the COVID narrative really entailed.

    Your invitation to look deeper has arrived. The Press Conference for the release of ‘Secret Recordings: The Real Peter Marks,’ hosted by ICAN CEO Del Bigtree, ICAN Lead Counsel Aaron Siri, Esq., and COVID Vaccine is live at thehighwire.com/watch.

    Click below to accept your invite.

    WATCH PRESS CONFERENCE
    https://thehighwire.com/watch/
    And after the press conference, go to TheRealPeterMarks.com to dive into ‘Secret Recordings: The Real Peter Marks,’ the interactive timeline.

    VIEW TIMELINE
    https://www.therealpetermarks.com/

    Truth matters. Accountability matters. "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th May 2025), ClearWater (6th May 2025), Ewan (7th May 2025), Harmony (7th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), Yoda (6th May 2025)

  11. Link to Post #2146
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,766
    Thanks
    9,482
    Thanked 45,598 times in 6,402 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    WATCH PRESS CONFERENCE
    https://thehighwire.com/watch/
    And after the press conference, go to TheRealPeterMarks.com to dive into ‘Secret Recordings: The Real Peter Marks,’ the interactive timeline.

    VIEW TIMELINE
    https://www.therealpetermarks.com/

    Truth matters. Accountability matters.
    ICANN has been amazing.

    David Martin has stated so many times that this is planned genocide. I came to the realization before that "Warp Speed" is the name for rapid delivery of the shot in every arm. If the plan is our death, the lack of compassion is sensible. I always go back to the idea that vermin, when killed, are not murdered.

    How deeply are our "leaders" mind controled to believe we are all "supposed" to DIE now? It is not a surface belief. My own freinds and family think I am a nut case to now understand that this is a murderous plan well known to those involved

    I am listening to this now.

    Dr. David Martin On Flourishing Amidst Emerging Chaos. No One Is Coming To Save Us, Embracing FULL Truth The Only Way.

    Shannon Joy
    5/5/2025


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6qsnd9/?pub=4

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th May 2025), Ewan (7th May 2025), Harmony (7th May 2025), Matthew (6th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), onawah (7th May 2025), Yoda (6th May 2025)

  13. Link to Post #2147
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    “COVID-19 Virus Was Created In An AMERICAN Lab!” – Jeffrey Sachs
    The Jimmy Dore Show
    1.52M subscribers
    96,757 views
    May 6, 2025

    (It's easy to discount Jimmy Dore as a reliable source because his show comes off in many ways and times as "entertainment", but in this case, the show does a good job of getting the truth out with reliable evidence.)

    "Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Sachs is now saying he is “99% sure” that the University of North Carolina (UNC) conducted extensive gain of function research beginning in 2015 and that this research led to the development of COVID-19.

    Sachs says he is concerned about unregulated research and the lack of global governance for handling dangerous pathogens. This systemic issue underscores the plausibility of an accidental release from a U.S. lab like UNC.

    Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the compelling evidence supporting the conclusion that COVID came from Ralph Baric’s research at UNC."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th May 2025), Delight (7th May 2025), Ewan (7th May 2025), Harmony (7th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), Sunny (8th May 2025), Yoda (7th May 2025)

  15. Link to Post #2148
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    70
    Posts
    11,562
    Thanks
    11,141
    Thanked 76,760 times in 10,839 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)

    "Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Sachs is now saying he is “99% sure” that the University of North Carolina (UNC) conducted extensive gain of function research beginning in 2015 and that this research led to the development of COVID-19.
    Dr David Martin has been 100% sure for 4 years, with all the receipts.

    Sachs may be offering something more pliable and spinable for someone's agenda ?

    It probably has already started with putting the date of 2015 on it. David Martin has the plot all the way back to 2011, with threads of planning going back further than that.

    By 2015 it was already C19/SC2.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  16. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th May 2025), Delight (7th May 2025), Ewan (8th May 2025), Harmony (7th May 2025), meat suit (7th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), onawah (7th May 2025), Sunny (8th May 2025), Yoda (7th May 2025)

  17. Link to Post #2149
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Deaths
    Analysis by A Midwestern Doctor
    May 09, 2025
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...&rid=288612947

    https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...deaths-pdf.pdf

    Story at-a-glance
    Multiple doctors have linked the DPT vaccine to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), noting that SIDS peaks coincide with vaccination schedules at 2, 4, and 6 months
    Since at least 1933, the medical community has known that vaccines cause infant deaths.
    To conceal this, those deaths were renamed “crib death” and then “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” (SIDS), eventually being attributed to infants not sleeping on their backs
    This revisionism is not supported by the existing evidence nor the historical changes in the frequency of SIDS.
    Most recently, SIDS rates have had an unprecedented decrease in tandem with the COVID-19 lockdowns reducing vaccination rates
    The vaccine most strongly associated with SIDS, DPT, was protected for decades by the government despite knowing a large body of evidence around the world showed it killed infants — particularly when an inevitable hot lot was released.
    Eventually, so many injury lawsuits were filed that in 1986, the government had to give blanket immunity to the vaccine manufacturers
    This article will review the body of evidence showing vaccines cause SIDS and reveal the mechanism modern research has now repeatedly proven causes vaccines to trigger infant death

    We're always told that vaccines were a medical marvel that safely ended the dark age of infectious disease. However, when the actual records are examined, they often abjectly failed to prevent those diseases, and worse still, frequently caused outbreaks and severely injured many of the recipients.

    This in part resulted from the inherent toxicity of vaccines and in part because manufacturing challenges regularly resulted in hot lots being released. Rather than address this, the vaccine industry chose to create a variety of strategies to conceal those issues, such as enshrining the dogma "all vaccines are safe" and giving blanket legal immunity to all the "safe" vaccines.

    https://odysee.com/@DoctorMercola:2/...lular-Wisdom:2

    The Toxicity Bell Curve
    When humans are exposed to toxins, the reactions to them are distributed such that severe injuries are much rarer. As a result, many of the more subtle, common reactions typically go unrecognized.



    Because of this, if a product causes a significant number of deaths (e.g., the COVID mRNA vaccines), that's often the tip of the iceberg and far larger number of injuries lie under the surface (e.g., polling showed that showed 34% of those vaccinated for COVID reported minor side effects and 7% reported significant side effects).

    Sudden Infant Deaths

    This sadly also holds true for infant deaths, and since its creation, the diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus (DPT) vaccine has been associated with those deaths.

    For example, in 2014, unmarked mass graves belonging to Irish orphans were discovered which belonged to a group of 2,051 children upon whom an early diphtheria vaccine was covertly tested in the 1930s.1

    Note: Early vaccine experiments2 (including DPT) were conducted in the 1960s to 1970s at Irish care homes, and the test subjects included babies and handicapped children.

    Likewise, as detailed by Sir Graham Wilson,3 in the early 1900s, there were over a dozen cases in the medical literature (and likely far more that weren't documented) where groups of children received an incorrectly prepared diphtheria vaccine, and collectively, thousands became severely ill, with hundreds suffering an agonizing death.

    A wave of deaths hence followed DPT's adoption, which like those following the COVID vaccines, became a "mysterious syndrome," initially being called "crib death" and then "Sudden Infant Death Syndrome" (SIDS). In turn, a few doctors saw this and spoke out against it.

    •James Howenstine, M.D. in 20034 stated:

    "The incidence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome has grown from .55 per 1000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota. The peak incidence for SIDS is at age 2 to 4 months, the exact time most vaccines are being given to children. 85% of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of infancy.

    The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992.

    This rise in SIDS deaths has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved sanitation and medical progress except SIDS. These deaths from SIDS did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given to a child was steadily rising to 36 per child."

    Note: It has always astounded me that the medical profession knows SIDS peaks at exactly 2, 4, and 6 months of age, but cannot connect that to childhood vaccines being given at the exact same time.

    •Robert Mendelsohn M.D. in his 1987 book "How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor"5 wrote:

    "My suspicion, which is shared by others in my profession, is that the nearly 10,000 SIDS deaths that occur in the United States each year are related to one or more of the vaccines that are routinely given to children. The pertussis vaccine is the most likely villain, but it could also be one or more of the others."

    Note: Although I believe pertussis (DPT) is the vaccine most strongly linked to SIDS, other vaccines also have an association (e.g., a 2007 VAERS analysis6 and a 1999, legislative testimony7 by Philip Incao, M.D. made compelling cases also linking SIDS to the hepatitis B vaccine).

    •In 1957, Archie Kalokerinos M.D.,8 desiring to serve the people, requested to be stationed in the neglected rural Aboriginal communities, as their infant mortality rate was 10% (whereas it was 2% in the surrounding white communities). Many diseases were rampant there (pneumonia, severe ear infections, severe infant irritability, and a frequent inability to feed the afflicted children), but were ignored and blamed on the uncivilized habits of the mothers.

    Quote A Midwestern Doctor
    @MidwesternDoc
    This is a shortened version of his opening statement:
    2:30 AM · Apr 24, 2025
    8,254 Views
    Archie eventually realized these deaths were due to severe nutritional deficiencies and quickly saved many lives9 (e.g., by injecting IV vitamin C or giving zinc).

    After the infant death rate climbed to 50% following an infant vaccination campaign, he realized that in the same way infections depleted vitamin C, vaccines did too, and rapidly stopped the vaccination deaths with injected vitamin C. Additionally, he also discovered that vaccinating a child who was currently ill was frequently lethal (which, to varying degrees, has also been reported throughout the medical literature).

    Note: Kalokerinos also found early breastfeeding was critical for infant health and preventing death, but unfortunately, colonial forces had shifted them towards formula — mirroring a pernicious trend seen globally. Many have since found breastfeeding counteracts many of the harms of vaccination (e.g., breastfeeding halves the rate of SIDS) — all of which is discussed here.

    Later, he used vitamin C to treat many other conditions too (e.g., otherwise fatal measles cases) — something coincidentally also being done by another pioneering doctor in America.10

    Note: Kalokerinos also showed that mothers accused of shaking their babies to death had in fact died of scurvy. Similarly, as I show here, the diagnosis "shaken baby syndrome" (invented in the 1970s) was frequently used to wrongfully convict parents whose children died in their sleep after vaccination.

    Many of these doctors' experiences (especially for Kalokerinos) were summarized in a talk by Raymond Obomsawin:
    https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/1915013128724664821

    Quote A Midwestern Doctor
    @MidwesternDoc
    In this powerful video Raymond Obomsawin PhD discusses all the evidence strongly linking vaccination to sudden infant death and what Archie (his friend) witnessed in Australia.
    7:01 AM · Apr 23, 2025
    5,819 Views

    https://x.com/i/status/1915013128724664821
    Note: Obomsawin also highlighted that when Japan moved the DPT injections from 3 to 5 months to 24 months of age, there was an 85% to 90% reduction in DPT brain damage and SIDS cases, and a 60% decrease in the overall infant mortality rate.

    A Shot in the Dark
    In addition to causing death, the DPT vaccine frequently caused brain injuries. As the media had not yet been bought out by the pharmaceutical industry (due to a 1997 FTC decision legalizing pharmaceutical television advertisements), programs critical of vaccination would occasionally air such as a 1982 one highlighting the profound disability being caused by the DPT vaccine.
    https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/1...nt-deaths.aspx
    Quote A Midwestern Doctor
    @MidwesternDoc
    In 1982, NBC aired an investigation about the pertussis vaccine (which was later banned) injuring children and the government's refusal to help them or develop a safer shot.

    In it, FDA and CDC officials used the same script to deny those injuries we still see today.
    11:35 AM · Nov 21, 2023
    152.3K Views
    Many parents with DPT injured children saw this program, called NBC and then were connected by NBC, forming "Dissatisfied Parents Together" one of the original vaccine safety groups, and in 1985, "DPT, A Shot in the Dark," was published.11 DPT, A Shot in the Dark highlighted that:12

    •As early as 1933, there were published reports of infant deaths shortly after DPT shots,13 including some where autopsies attributed the deaths to vaccination.14

    •Simultaneous identical twin deaths are an extraordinarily rare event and are hence considered a gold standard for establishing causality, and in 1946, two twins died (on their backs) within 24 hours of their second DPT vaccine15 — something also shown in 1987,16 2006,17 2007,18 2010,19 and 201320 case reports.

    •Researchers like Dr. William Torch (who analyzed 72 sequential SIDS cases21 and then over 200)22 showed that these deaths clustered shortly after vaccination — something which could not be explained by chance.

    •The FDA's pertussis vaccine specialist, Charles Manclark had stated in 197623 that:

    "Pertussis vaccine is one of the more troublesome products to produce and assay. As an example, the pertussis vaccine has one of the highest failure rates of all products submitted to the Bureau of Biologics for testing and release. Approximately 15% to 20% of all lots that pass the manufacturer's tests fail to pass the Bureau's tests."

    •In 1978 to 1979, eleven infants in Tennessee died within eight days of receiving a DPT vaccine; nine had been vaccinated with the same lot — Wyeth #64201 — and five (four from that lot) died within 24 hours. Statistical analysis showed that such a clustering of deaths would occur by chance only 3% of the time; later estimates put the probability even lower — between 0.2% and 0.5%.

    In June, CDC Director Dr. William Foege told the Surgeon General that while a causal link to those deaths couldn't be confirmed, it also couldn't be ruled out. Three weeks later, FDA official Harry Meyer cited Foege's memo to reject Wyeth's request to list SIDS-related risk factors as contraindications for the DPT vaccine, stating there was no medical basis or evidence that such labeling would prevent SIDS.

    •Following this, in 1979 Wyeth's senior leadership published a memo which stated future DPT lots needed to be distributed across the country (rather than sent to one place) so a repeat of the 1978 to 1979 incident would not occur again.

    Additionally, another cluster of SIDS deaths in Fresno California led to the local newspaper conducting an investigation that revealed widespread issues with hot DPT lots, had doctors in the area providence evidence DPT was indeed causing SIDS, and disclosed that a 1978 study on the safety of the DPT vaccine was buried after researchers discovered adverse reactions within 48 hours of immunization were 5000% higher than expected.

    This damning indictment of the DPT vaccine led to national vaccine safety legislation being passed in 198624 (which sadly subsequently got co-opted and became nothing but a blanket liability shield for industry) and the whole cell DTwP vaccine eventually being replaced with the safer acellular DTaP vaccine.

    Note: Since the DTaP vaccine costs more to produce, industry long resisted it and still gives DTwP to poorer regions like Africa.25

    Quote A Midwestern Doctor
    @MidwesternDoc
    Finally, RFK Jr. (in this 2023 campaign interview) discusses how the immune suppression and deaths Archie witnessed in Australia were also witnessed by the WHO in Africa (but sadly ignored).
    7:01 AM · Apr 23, 2025
    12.6K Views
    Peter Aaby, a renowned vaccine scientist and promoter of vaccination, was commissioned by the WHO to study the effects of vaccines commonly utilized in charitable programs by the international community on infant mortality (studies which for context are almost never conducted). To his horror, Aaby discovered:26

    "DPT was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated [DTwP increased deaths 3.93 times in boys and 9.98 times in girls]. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DPT. Unfortunately, DPT is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion of people who receive DPT is used globally as an indicator of a country's vaccination program performance.

    It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that the DPT vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Although a vaccine protects children against the target disease, it may also increase their susceptibility to unrelated infections."

    Aaby's 2017 results were, not surprisingly, buried, and due to Bill Gate's "donations" vaccination (including with DTwP) has become a greater and greater focus of the WHO. However, in 2019 Peter Gøtzsche, M.D., a renowned expert on research fraud (who has been a critical reformer in evidence-based medicine), then conducted a systematic review of the DPT program27 which concluded:

    "Evidence tells us that it is likely that the DPT vaccine increases total mortality in low-income countries."

    Note: Aaby found the primary cause of these deaths was DPT inducing immune suppression and other infections later killing the infants (something which has also been observed with many other vaccines).

    Dose-Response Relationships
    A key metric for establishing causality is demonstrating a dose-response relationship (e.g., more vaccines causing more deaths).

    On a national level, this has been shown by SIDS rates going up as the number of vaccines increased. Likewise, a 2011 study28 of the 34 nations with the lowest infant mortality rate (America being No. 34) showed an unmistakable relationship between total vaccinations and SIDS.


    [IMG]media.mercola.com/ImageServer/public/2025/April/mean-infant-mortality-rates.jpg[/IMG]

    Giving multiple vaccinations simultaneously (e.g., hexavalent vaccines29 containing DTP + Polio + Haemophilus Influenza B + Hepatitis B) has also been repeatedly shown to increase the risk of SIDS. For example:

    •When GSK's hexavalent vaccine hit the market, SIDS cases were observed, eventually prompting a 2005 study of Germany's adverse event database30 that found an increase in SIDS cases was associated with the vaccine.

    •A 2011 study31 of Italy's adverse event database found hexavalent vaccines increased the risk of infant death 2.2 times in the 14 days that followed.

    •A judge then forced GSK to release their confidential safety data which showed 90% of reported infant deaths occurred immediately following vaccination (again strongly suggesting an association).32,33

    •A later confidential 2015 report GSK gave to European regulators showed almost 52.5% of vaccine-linked deaths occurred within 3 days of vaccination, 82.2% within seven days, and 97.9% within ten days.34,35

    •A 2012 VAERS analysis36 of all reported infant deaths found that infants who received twice as many vaccines at one time were roughly twice as likely to die or be hospitalized.

    Similarly, since all infants receive the same vaccine dose, premature infants (being smaller) effectively receive a higher dose. In turn, that analysis37 also found the youngest infants were the most likely to die following vaccination.

    Respiratory Arrest
    Infants can experience a cardiorespiratory event, such as an interruption of breathing or a significant slowing of the heart rate, following vaccination. In many cases, these events require CPR, and had the infant not been monitored at the hospital when it occurred, the infant would have likely died. This has been proven by decades of hospital studies of premature infants that all showed:

    •Roughly a third of premature infants experienced a cardiorespiratory event following vaccination (whereas virtually none did beforehand), and about a third of those then required respiratory support.

    •Those who were smaller or who had existing chronic diseases were more susceptible to these cardiopulmonary events (mirroring Kalokerinos's observations).

    •These events often recurred after subsequent vaccinations.

    Note: I summarized 13 studies on vaccines stopping breathing here, including a recent 2025 trial.38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50

    Remarkably, despite this complication of vaccination being recognized by the medical field, it has never been connected to SIDS and still is viewed as inconsequential relative to "immense benefits of vaccination."51

    As such, an Australian group developed a way to monitor infants at home continuously52 and, like many others, was able to demonstrate non-fatal disruptions of breathing spiked following DPT and Polio vaccination (this is the most likely cause of SIDS) and that this disruption continued for over six weeks post-vaccination53 (hence overlapping with the typical period of death that has been observed to follow vaccination).

    Most importantly, the breathing often had not fully recovered by the time the next vaccine was given.54,55



    Note: Some package inserts56 for DTaP vaccines list SIDS as a possible side effect.

    What Causes SIDS?
    When SIDS autopsies are conducted (detailed here), they typically find unusual changes such as acute congestion, edema and small hemorrhages in the brainstem and internal organs along with brain tissue infiltration by different immune cells.57,58,59,60

    Note: These findings mirror what Kalokerinos observed in the many autopsies he conducted61 (and attributed to bacterial LPS endotoxins). Likewise, a government pertussis specialist shared with me that some of these effects (e.g., vascular leakage) are also seen with pertussis toxin toxicity (which suggests the vaccine pertussis toxin may not be fully inactivated — something which was frequently an issue with previous lethal diphtheria hot lots62).

    One of the greatest dangers with vaccines is that they cause blood cells to clump together, creating microstrokes in smaller blood vessels.63 Certain parts of the brain are more vulnerable to this, and as such, specific cranial nerves (e.g., 6 and 7) will frequently display observable deficits after vaccination (e.g., the eyes turning inwards).

    Since a key area of the brain for ensuring automatic breathing is very close to the nuclei for the commonly affected cranial nerves, breathing is likely affected by those microstrokes as well.



    In turn, I suspect that the partial interruptions of respiration occur when there is a partial interruption of one side's blood supply, whereas the full respiratory arrest occurs when both sides are affected. Similarly, the neurologist who discovered vaccination caused pathologic microstrokes also came across cases where a cranial nerve 6 deficit on both sides (implying both sides of the brainstem had a partial loss of blood flow) directly preceded SIDS.

    Note: Kalokerinos also believed the loss of automatic breathing came from LPS attacking the brainstem's respiratory center and that vitamin C rapidly neutralized it, whereas I believe the hemorrhages, coagulation, swelling he saw were in part due to zeta potential changes and that the rapid improvements he saw following vitamin C were due to it restoring the physiologic zeta potential.

    The Evolution of SIDS
    The Back to Sleep campaign (founded on the idea SIDS was caused by sleeping facedown and the infant then suffocating) is often heralded as one of the greatest successes in medical history since SIDS rates declined after it began — hence leading to that success being used to debunk the link between SIDS and vaccination.

    However, if you look at the actual data, a strong case can be made that drop was due to the TDwP to TDaP switch and then the reclassification of SIDS cases:



    Note: Somewhat analogously, the decline in Polio was likely due to nerve damaging pesticides being phased out when the vaccine was introduced, and most cases of paralysis being reclassified as no longer being polio.

    Since that time, the total infant death rate remained relatively unchanged, until in 2020 something extraordinary happened — the lockdowns led to America's first significant drop in vaccination as well-child (vaccination) visits were "non-essential." At the time, many in the vaccine safety community predicted this would lead to an unprecedented drop in SIDS rates. Vaccination rates indeed dropped, and in tandem, deaths did as well:64



    But only in children at the ages SIDS typically affects:



    Furthermore, due to the political climate in Florida in 2021,65 the state's childhood vaccination rate decreased from 93.4% in 2020 to 79.3% in 2021. At the same time, all-cause infant mortality under one year of age in Florida also reduced by 8.93% (a reversal of the 2020 trend, where infant mortality had increased by 0.67%).

    A 14% decrease in vaccination coverage was associated with a 9% decrease in infant mortality, suggesting roughly half of the infant deaths in Florida could potentially be attributed to vaccinations.

    Note: Earlier this week, Idaho twins were found dead in bed, a highly unusual event prompting a homicide investigation.66 From speaking to doctors directly connected to the case, I learned that the infants were three months premature, and after receiving five vaccines concurrently, became cyanotic, were told they had a vaccine reaction and give Tylenol. The infants completely changed and eight days later had terrible diarrhea and an unusual bile discharge, then died later that night in bed.

    Those who knew the family did not suspect a homicide and likewise, a colleague who reviewed the autopsy shared there was no evidence of foul play. Had the common risk factors for vaccine caused SIDS been known, this tragedy likely would have been avoided.67

    Conclusion
    "Something can be very obvious. I mean, what could be more obvious than the dead kid? It can be extremely serious and its existence not only be ignored, but denied, and unless this is understood, it is impossible to understand what my problem was. Now, I knew that these other places were having infant deaths too. Yet when I spoke to doctors, their response was almost universally hostile. So I was left to handle the problem by myself."

    ~ Archie Kalokerinos

    One of the saddest things about vaccine injuries is that children lack the ability to communicate how vaccines have injured them or refuse further immunizations. In turn, one of the most heartbreaking things I've had to witness in medicine are children, in whatever way they can, trying to tell their parents or doctors and nurses that vaccines are hurting them, but are ignored and have something catastrophic happen after they are injected without their consent.

    However, now that so many adults (who can communicate) have been injured by the COVID vaccines, the veil has been removed, and an awareness is forming around the potential consequences of vaccination. Secretary Kennedy is now at last beginning the long overdue evaluation of the safety of the vaccines given to our children, and it is imperative we do all that we can to support this investigation being allowed to proceed forward.

    Author's Note: This is an abbreviated version of a full-length article that takes a deeper look into the evidence linking SIDS to vaccination, which can be read here. Additionally, a companion article on exactly how vaccines cause microstrokes and neurological injuries can be read here along with a companion article which details all the evidence linking specific chronic illnesses and how to recognize the subtle effects of vaccination (which can be read here).

    A Note from Dr. Mercola About the Author
    A Midwestern Doctor (AMD) is a board-certified physician from the Midwest and a longtime reader of Mercola.com. I appreciate AMD's exceptional insight on a wide range of topics and am grateful to share it. I also respect AMD's desire to remain anonymous since AMD is still on the front lines treating patients. To find more of AMD's work, be sure to check out The Forgotten Side of Medicine on Substack.

    "


    Sources and References
    1 RT.com, 9 Jun, 2014
    2 The Independent, November 5, 2007 (Archived)
    3 The Athlone Press, 1967
    4 NewsWithViews.com, December 7, 2003
    5 Penguin, May 12, 1987
    6 Medical Veritas, 2007
    7 Ohio Legislative Testimony, 1999 (Archived)
    8, 61 Keats Pub, January 1, 1981
    9 Sunday Morning Herald, March 17, 2012 (Archived)
    10 Journal of Applied Nutrition, 1971, Vol. 23, Nos. 3 and 4, pp. 61–87
    11, 12 Amazon, Dpt: A Shot in the Dark
    13 JAMA. 1933;101(3):187-188
    14 Br Med J. 1978 Apr 1;1(6116):809-15
    15 J Am Med Assoc. 1946 Jun 29:131:730-5
    16 Arch Dis Child. 1987 Jul;62(7):754-9
    17, 18 J Forensic Leg Med. 2007 Feb;14(2):87-91
    19 Int J Legal Med. 2010 Nov;124(6):631-5
    20, 21, 22, 32, 35, 37, 55 Toxicol Rep. 2021 Jun 24;8:1324–1335
    23 Advances in Applied Microbiology, Volume 20, 1976, Pages 1-7
    24 H.R.5546 - National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
    25 Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis, December 2018 (Archived)
    26 eBioMedicine. 2017 Feb 1;17:192–198
    27 Peter C. Gøtzsche, June 19, 2019 (Archived)
    28 Hum Exp Toxicol. 2011 Sep;30(9):1420–1428
    29 Wikipedia, Hexavalent Vaccine
    30 Eur J Pediatr. 2005 Feb;164(2):61-9
    31 PLoS One. 2011 Jan 26;6(1):e16363
    33, 34 Jacob Puliyel, Sathyamala, September 5, 2017
    36 Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012 Apr 24;31(10):1012–1021
    38 J Paediatr Child Health. 1997 Oct;33(5):418-21
    39 Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E3
    40 Acta Paediatr. 2001 Aug;90(8):916-20
    41 Eur J Pediatr. 2005 Jul;164(7):432-5
    42 BMC Pediatrics volume 6, Article number: 20 (2006)
    43 Vaccine. 2007 Jan 22;25(6):1036-42
    44 J Pediatr. 2007 Aug;151(2):167-72
    45 J Pediatr. 2008 Sep;153(3):429-31
    46 J Perinatol. 2010 Feb;30(2):118-21
    47 Vaccine. 2011 Aug 5;29(34):5681-7
    48 J Pediatr (Rio J). 2012 Mar-Apr;88(2):137-42
    49 Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2012;156(3):A3797
    50 JAMA Pediatr. 2025;179(3):246-254
    51, 53 J. Aust. Coll. Nutr. & Env. Med. Vol. 23 No. 3 (December 2004) Pages 1-5 (Archived)
    52, 54 Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, 01 December 2004
    56 Fda.gov, Package Insert - INFANRIX
    57 Virchows Arch. 2006 Jan;448(1):100-4
    58 Current Medicinal Chemistry 21(7)
    59 Vaccine. 2006 Jul 26;24(31-32):5779-80
    60 Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Aug 6;179(2-3):e25-9
    62 The Forgotten Side of Medicine, July 12, 2024
    63 The Forgotten Side of Medicine, March 31, 2024
    64 Health Choice, June 18, 2020
    65 Igor’s Newsletter, March 14, 2022
    66 KTVB, May 2, 2025
    67 X, May 3, 2025
    Last edited by onawah; 9th May 2025 at 21:28.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (9th May 2025), ClearWater (10th May 2025), Ewan (10th May 2025), gs_powered (15th May 2025), Harmony (10th May 2025), meat suit (10th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), Yoda (10th May 2025)

  19. Link to Post #2150
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Sharyl Attkisson/How Pharma’s Pulls Off Their BIGGEST Crimes With Media Protection!
    The Jimmy Dore Show
    1.52M subscribers
    May 9, 2025

    (Jimmy Dore has been getting some great whistleblowers on his show recently, and Attkisson is certainly one...)

    Last edited by onawah; 10th May 2025 at 00:23.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th May 2025), Ewan (10th May 2025), Harmony (10th May 2025), mountain_jim (10th May 2025), Vangelo (11th May 2025), Yoda (10th May 2025)

  21. Link to Post #2151
    Avalon Member Eva2's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st January 2011
    Posts
    3,016
    Thanks
    11,675
    Thanked 26,800 times in 2,977 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Really don't understand people born in the 50s and 60s supporting/believing in this. Most people I know from that era, including myself that never got vaccines for this (I don't even think there was an actual vaccine for measles then?), got measles, chicken pox and some other childhood viruses, stayed out of school for a week or so quarantining at home, without any vaccines and after going through the process of healing, ended up with a natural immunity. Although this is an obvious statement/observation, it always surprises with the amount of coverage this all gets and how many people are buying into it.




  22. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Eva2 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th May 2025), bojancan (11th May 2025), ClearWater (11th May 2025), Ewan (11th May 2025), Harmony (12th May 2025), mountain_jim (11th May 2025), onawah (11th May 2025), Sue (Ayt) (11th May 2025), Vangelo (11th May 2025), Yoda (10th May 2025)

  23. Link to Post #2152
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,766
    Thanks
    9,482
    Thanked 45,598 times in 6,402 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Jack Kruse has hired people to investigate the Means twins. They are deep state assets.


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6qyayr/?pub=4

  24. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th May 2025), ClearWater (12th May 2025), Harmony (12th May 2025), mountain_jim (18th May 2025), Yoda (11th May 2025)

  25. Link to Post #2153
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,766
    Thanks
    9,482
    Thanked 45,598 times in 6,402 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Laura loomer talking about vetting MAHA candidates at 37:50


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6qzujh/?pub=4
    Last edited by Delight; 11th May 2025 at 21:20.

  26. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th May 2025), ClearWater (12th May 2025), Harmony (12th May 2025), mountain_jim (18th May 2025), Vangelo (11th May 2025), Yoda (11th May 2025)

  27. Link to Post #2154
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Moderna Faces Suspension in U.K. Over Allegations of Bribing Children to Join mRNA COVID-19 Shot Trials
    by Natasha Hobley
    Published May 13, 2025
    https://thevaccinereaction.org/2025/...9-shot-trials/



    "U.S. vaccine manufacturer Moderna is under investigation in the United Kingdom over claims it offered children financial incentives to participate in clinical trials of the mRNA COVID-19 biological, which is an alleged breach of British pharmaceutical regulations that could result in the company’s suspension from the country’s industry trade body.1

    According to reports, children were offered up to £1,500 (approximately $2,000) to join the trials—an incentive banned under the United Kingdom’s Medicines for Human Use regulations, which prohibit payments to minors or their parents for clinical trial participation.1

    Regulatory Body Finds Multiple Breaches from Moderna
    The U.K.’s Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the self-regulatory arm of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI), has found that Moderna violated key provisions of the ABPI Code. These include “bringing discredit upon, and reducing confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry” and “failing to maintain high standards,” according to an interim case report.1 2

    If formally found guilty, Moderna could be suspended or expelled from the ABPI—effectively stripping the company of its ability to market or sell products in the U.K.1

    Beyond financial inducements, Moderna reportedly distributed teddy bears to children and misled regulators about when it first became aware of the incentives. While the company claimed it acted immediately upon learning of the payments in January 2024, internal documents indicate senior executives were informed as early as August 2023 and failed to take prompt action.

    The PMCPA condemned the company’s behavior as demonstrating a “completely unacceptable” lack of transparency and a serious blow to the industry’s credibility.1 3

    Undisclosed Promotions from Moderna Employee Spark Further Criticism
    Further compounding the controversy, a senior Moderna employee was found to have co-authored three articles promoting Moderna’s products without disclosing his affiliation with the company. One article was co-written with former U.K. vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi. The same employee also promoted Moderna’s products on social media without transparency about his role at the firm.1

    Molly Kingsley, founder of the non-profit campaign group UsForThem, stated:

    Quote Many of the previous judgments against Moderna have revealed how readily it put profit ahead of the health and safety of children. Now it has also laid bare just how little regard it has had for the regulatory system that was supposed to keep it honest. Never before has a company so new to the pharmaceutical industry been rebuked in this way.3
    Moderna, which joined the ABPI in 2023, is now subject to a full audit by the PMCPA to assess whether its “culture, governance, and compliance framework” are functioning effectively. Additional sanctions may follow based on the audit’s findings.

    Moderna has already faced multiple PMCPA rulings in the past year, including fines for promoting its Spikevax COVID shot using off-label data—violations critics say are barely a deterrent for a company that earned nearly £7 billion in 2023.3

    Mounting Concerns Over Industry Trust
    Esther McVey, former member of the parliamentary group on COVID-19 vaccine damage, noted that the PMCPA has ruled against Moderna in six separate cases in recent months.

    “Ordering an audit of Moderna’s internal practices is highly unusual and reputationally damaging, but it is incredible that the regulator has no real power to impose appropriate fines or other meaningful penalties which might make pharmaceutical companies think twice before breaking the rules,” McVey continued.3

    “They know they can get away with it, and so they do; time and time again. It’s hardly surprising that public trust in the pharmaceutical industry and its regulators is through the floor.”3[/SIZE][/B] "

    References:

    1 Bergman F. Moderna faces ban for bribing children to join COVID ‘vaccine’ trials. Slay News Apr. 27, 2025.
    2 O’Dowd A. Moderna could be expelled from ABPI after breaching rules over covid vaccine trial. The BMJ News May 2, 2025.
    3 Knapton S. Moderna faces suspension over Covid jab breaches. Telegraph Apr. 26, 2025.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  28. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (14th May 2025), ClearWater (13th May 2025), Ewan (14th May 2025), Harmony (14th May 2025), mountain_jim (18th May 2025), Yoda (14th May 2025)

  29. Link to Post #2155
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,248
    Thanks
    12,502
    Thanked 11,080 times in 1,233 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    There is an important public meeting occurring in the U.S. on May 22nd about including the latest version of the Covid-19 shots in the childhood schedule. The U.S. federal government is asking for public comments before this important meeting. Use the following link to submit your comments:
    Comments link

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (14th May 2025), ClearWater (15th May 2025), Ewan (14th May 2025), Harmony (14th May 2025), mountain_jim (18th May 2025), onawah (14th May 2025), Yoda (14th May 2025)

  31. Link to Post #2156
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Dr. Andrew Wakefield/Policy Over Parents: The MMR Story You Haven’t Heard
    From:Bailey Kuykendoll <advocates@standforhealthfreedom.com>
    5/20/25
    https://open.spotify.com/episode/7gY...2aa57d37f84da1
    (Podcast at the link)


    (Dr. Andrew Wakefield paid a heavy price for being one of the first credible whistleblowers to give voice to what is obviously now part of the Globalists' depopulation agenda. Even after he was publicly vindicated, he faced huge odds in regaining his good name and it was heart-breaking to watch even as the evil agenda only gathered strength. It's good to see his name back in the news now. Much more about him in the latter part of the next article from Stand for Health Freedom posted in this thread.)

    "Too often, the answer to a controversial question is silence — or worse, punishment, even in the case of a doctor trying to take a stand for his patients.

    Our newest article and podcast episode dive into the untold story of the MMR vaccine, government overreach, and the silencing of medical dissent. Featuring Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the physician who first questioned the safety of the combined MMR shot, and whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, who exposed data manipulation at the CDC, this episode reveals a system more committed to control than to care.

    The government’s decision to eliminate access to individual measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines wasn’t made with families in mind. It was about convenience, cost-efficiency, and compliance — not safety, transparency, or choice.

    This is the reality of one-size-fits-all, government-backed medicine. And the consequences are too big to ignore.

    Read the full article here:https://healthfreedominstitute.com/mmr/
    Listen to the podcast, where we interview Andrew Wakefield here:
    https://open.spotify.com/episode/7gY...2aa57d37f84da1

    Let’s bring this conversation into the light. Because informed parents — not unaccountable policymakers — should be at the center of children’s health decisions."
    Last edited by onawah; 20th May 2025 at 21:44.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th May 2025), ClearWater (20th May 2025), Ewan (21st May 2025), Harmony (21st May 2025), mountain_jim (22nd May 2025), Vangelo (21st May 2025), Yoda (20th May 2025)

  33. Link to Post #2157
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Shining a Light on MMR
    https://healthfreedominstitute.com/mmr/
    5/20/25


    (Lots of info from and about Dr. Andrew Wakefield in the latter part of this article and a poscast featuring a new interview from Stand for Health Feedom with Wakefield is here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/7gY...39ff5bdcb04065

    "More combos, less choice.
    Highlights

    This article is a companion to measles, mumps, and rubella individually.
    Making MMR a combination shot, and removing the availability of the individual measles, mumps, or rubella vaccines, was a policy and profit decision.
    Vaccines have weakened the protection a mother can give naturally and generationally. The very policy aimed at eliminating measles created new vulnerability. By reducing natural infection, widespread vaccination has diminished maternal immunity across generations — leaving infants more susceptible and prompting new calls to vaccinate even earlier. The solution is the problem.
    Dr. Andrew Wakefield dared to call for an investigation between MMR and autism in an oft-cited 1998 Lancet publication and became public health enemy number 1. What do you need to know about “the Wakefield paper” to make an informed decision as a parent?
    A CDC scientist became a whistleblower in 2014, exposing a CDC cover-up of scientific study results showing that African American boys under age 3 had a 340% increased risk of autism after MMR.
    Two formerMerck virologists became whistleblowers in 2010, revealing fraud in studies given to the FDA about mumps vaccine efficacy. The resulting case was resolved in Merck’s favor 14 years later on a technicality.
    Choice is taken away from parents by combo shots
    If doctors could give your kid one shot with all the vaccines at once, they would. The “simplification” of the vaccine schedule has been the goal since the first meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization practices (ACIP) in 1964, which launched the childhood vaccine program as we know it. 1



    This holy grail of vaccinology has long been a dream, but always an undercurrent. Since the inception of influenza vaccine research a century ago, there have been attempts to create a universal flu vaccine for any strain, and researchers are still trying!2 Most recently, as part of “Generation Gold Standard” under the Trump administration, a new effort has been announced to create a “universal vaccine platform” for multiple pathogens in one. 3

    Of course, one shot is less stressful to administer than many. And the more visits needed, the less likely the patient is to receive any shot at all. It should be no surprise that combination shots are created with the specific intent to get more vaccines into more kids; it’s about policy and profits, rather than clinical best practices.

    What remains unspoken is the fact that combining shots takes away choice. The classic example is when a person is told in an emergency room they need a tetanus shot for a wound, but not told tetanus is available only in combination with diphtheria and maybe pertussis too. We see the lack of respect for choice expressly stated in a 2006 article in “Drugs of Today” about the development of the combination MMR-V, which combined the MMR shot, which had “almost 100% coverage,” with varicella (chickenpox), which had “significantly lower uptake of 84%.” The author concludes, “The ProQuad combination vaccine facilitates implementation of varicella vaccination into routine childhood immunization schedules and will help protect children against these four potentially serious diseases.” To translate, “facilitates implementation” means it makes it easier to carry out or advance a policy by removing barriers. It’s concerning when the primary factor for changing a nationwide pediatric recommendation is not based on optimal health outcomes, but on administrative logistics.

    Combination vaccines have been called the “cornerstone” of vaccine programs, but most research and development is not focused on combination shots.4 Perhaps this is not surprising.Why would a manufacturer focus manpower and money on combining existing shots when there’s a much bigger payoff for creating a new product?

    However, despite the “superabundance”5 of the ever-increasing, “saturated” list of recommended shots for our kids and pregnant moms, combination shots are seen as “the future.”6 Why? Because there are even more shots in the pipeline, and the more they add the more resistance, or “barriers to access,” they meet.



    Source: Oberman, Elayna. “Fewer Shots, More Protection: The Promise of Combination Vaccines.” PATH, (2025)
    In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) planned its first meeting of its new Technical Advisory Group on Combination Vaccines to run alongside the Global Vaccine and Innovation Research Forum in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in March 2025.7 Combo shots are seen as important in advancing the Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals.



    Source: “Terms of Reference for the Technical Advisory Group on Combination Vaccines.” World Health Organization, (2020)8
    History of the MMR combo
    The 1960s marked a major turning point in vaccine development for two reasons: New technologies for growing viruses in eggs and embryos expanded research possibilities9, and the U.S. government viewed the polio vaccine as a triumph it hoped to replicate.

    As explored in Shining a Light on Measles, the drive to develop a measles vaccine was scientific ambition, not a public health crisis. Prominent scientists likened it to conquering Mount Everest — we do because we can. Even leading epidemiologists believed society had adapted to the virus and it was no longer a major threat.

    The mumps vaccine was in the same category — the illness considered a nuisance but not a serious threat to children. The military considered mumps a national security threat during WWII, but that market was not big enough. As described by a surgeon of the United States Public Health Service in 1945, “Mumps in civilian populations does not usually constitute a serious public health problem. Epidemics are relatively infrequent, mortality negligible, and disability in children is usually of mild degree with few complications.”

    Merck was at the forefront of making these vaccines, and they found themselves in a pickle. They had two vaccines with no market because the illnesses they aimed to prevent were considered common, mild, expected, and generally self-limiting. Nonetheless, U.S. health authorities saw vaccine development as a means of demonstrating scientific leadership. Top scientists at the Public Health Service (the forerunner to the CDC) boasted in an official statement that measles could be eliminated within four years of vaccine introduction.10 That was delayed a few decades, and the World Health Organization launched a global measles eradication initiative through its Expanded Programme on Immunization in the 1970s. Scientific bravado was high — but public demand was not.

    But the general populations weren’t concerned with lofty scientific shows of might or what an international organization set its sights on. They had to be convinced to care. So Merck had a costly conundrum. How do you sell a product when there’s no market? What if it’s inescapably bundled with a product the public does want?

    Measles was licensed in 1963 and mumps in 1967. (Remember, the mumps vaccine was the fastest developed product before COVID.) These two vaccines were invented and licensed when another common childhood illness was surging, as it did every 6-9 years: rubella. Known as German Measles, rubella wasn’t considered a serious threat for children either. It wasn’t until the 1940s when an ophthalmologist noted a correlation between pediatric cataract patients and their mother’s rubella infections during pregnancy that any concern arose around mumps. However, debate about whether that singular finding was scientifically accurate and significant went on for years.

    Licensed in 1969, the rubella vaccine was immediately recommended for all children, in order to protect babies in the womb. The stage was set for quick acceptance by the public with statistics that tens of thousands of babies had been miscarried or born with serious developmental disability during the previous epidemic. The horrors of thalidomide (a drug for morning sickness that caused severe birth defects) were being revealed, with images of deformed children all over the media.

    Within two years, Merck was able to hitch the measles vaccine to the rubella vaccine, which did have a market, and add mumps as well. Interest in the rubella vaccine alone waned after the epidemic passed, but the federal government was invested in seeing the measles vaccine succeed, so packaging the three vaccines together was a stroke of sales brilliance for Merck.

    The MMR (and Measles-Rubella MR) was licensed in 1971, but interestingly the CDC didn’t officially recommend a mumps shot until 1977. The popular website History.com opines that we wouldn’t have a mumps vaccine if it hadn’t been grouped with measles and rubella.11



    Source: “Evidence and Policymaking: The Introduction of MMR Vaccine in the Netherlands.” Social Science & Medicine, (2010): bib12.
    The MMR has been around since 1971, but that doesn’t mean it’s been the same all that time. For example, the rubella portion was swapped from Merck’s design to Stanley Plotkin’s RA-27 fetal cell line version after it was determined by researchers the vaccine was safer and more effective when grown on aborted fetal cells, rather than chicken egg cell cultures.

    Why isn’t the MMR vaccine given before a child’s first birthday?
    The first dose of MMR is recommended for infants between 12 and 15 months. Why not younger? Infants below 12 months old are not given the MMR because their mother’s protection is so effective it stops the vaccine from working.

    As one study put it, “Maternal antibodies passed to the fetus during pregnancy impair vaccine efficacy in younger infants.”12 In other words, mothers give their babies antibodies to pathogens through the placenta before birth and in their milk following birth.

    The effect isn’t limited to components of the MMR. A publication in the journal “Vaccine” in 2015 noted, “Immune responses to all types of vaccines, including live-attenuated, inactivated, and subunit vaccines, have been reported to be inhibited by the presence of maternal antibody.”13 This raises an important question: If maternal antibodies inhibit the immune response to all vaccine types, why are 29 doses of vaccines administered during infancy on the current schedule?

    As it turns out, mothers who were vaccinated against measles instead of having a natural infection have fewer and shorter-lasting antibodies to give to their babies.14 This means MMR recommendations are leaving infants less protected than they would be if nature ran its course. Vaccines have weakened the protection a mother can give naturally and generationally. The very policy aimed at eliminating measles created new vulnerability. By reducing natural infection, widespread vaccination has diminished maternal immunity across generations — leaving infants more susceptible and prompting new calls to vaccinate even earlier. The solution is the problem.


    Source: “Measles Maternal Antibodies With Low Avidity Do Not Interfere With the Establishment of Robust Quantity and Quality Antibody Responses After the Primary Dose of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Administered at 12-Months of Age.” Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society, (2019).
    Undetected retroviruses
    In 2010, researchers discovered that MMR vaccines had been contaminated with avian retroviruses — specifically, avian leukosis virus (ALV) and endogenous avian retrovirus (EAV). These viruses had gone undetected for decades because older technology couldn’t identify them. According to pro-vaccine outlet Vaxopedia, these contaminants had been present in the vaccine since its creation, we just didn’t have the technology to find it.15

    While follow-up studies claimed these retroviruses do not pose a threat to human health16, the fact remains: They were not known to be there. This underscores a critical point for informed consent — vaccine risks are not always identified before widespread use. History has shown that contaminants can go undetected for years, and safety assurances often come after mass administration.17



    Mumps vaccine and the U.K. meningitis outbreak
    In the early 1990s, the United Kingdom (U.K.) withdrew a dangerous MMR vaccine that caused meningitis 2-4 weeks after the shot, but took four years to do it. After seeing a cluster of meningitis cases after vaccination in the city of Nottingham, England, that “suggested a risk of 1 in 4,000 doses, substantially higher than previous estimates based on case reports from pedaeatricians (4 per million),” the government decided to investigate.18 In a study published in the Lancet, it was assessed the risk was around 1 in 11,000 doses of Urabe-strain mumps vaccine.

    The British newspaper “The Independent” reported in 1992 that “children received vaccine despite meningitis risk.”19 It was told that the government spent four years ascertaining whether there was a link, while thousands of children were being vaccinated without parents knowing there was a question about safety. The article doesn’t focus on those four years where parents were not informed of a potentially serious increased risk; it focuses on the days between when the government decided it needed to pull the recommendation for brands with a dangerous strain of mumps vaccine and when they actually told the public. The Independent reported that officials delayed announcing the withdrawal in order to secure enough doses of the alternative MMR II vaccine. Their public health priority was uninterrupted coverage, not transparency.

    In 1994, a U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) report acknowledged the need for further investigation into whether the Urabe strain of mumps virus caused aseptic meningitis. This reflects a broader pattern in vaccine safety evaluation: Many risks are not definitively studied until after a product is licensed and in widespread use.

    The IOM also recommended further study into thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative found in some vaccines. This foreshadowed future public concern and the subsequent Omnibus Autism Proceedings in U.S. vaccine court, where our federal government summarily dismissed the claims of thousands of families citing vaccine-induced autism in children from either the MMR shot or thimerosal-containing shots – and claims were dismissed after evaluating only a few “test cases.”20 These examples show how the drug industry and specifically the vaccine program has a track record of waiting for postmarket safety evaluations, instead of honoring the precautionary principle, raising serious questions about the depth of informed consent that is possible. Time after time we see safety investigations secretly done after vaccine licensure, while parents are left in the dark about potential risks.

    At the same time our federal government was doubling down on vaccine policy with Clinton’s Comprehensive Childhood Immunization Initiative, leading to widespread federal payments of schedule-shots through Vaccines for Children21 and the corollary global push for more, the public was starting to see cracks in the foundation and to ask questions. It was at this moment that Andrew Wakefield and colleagues stepped on to the international stage to highlight big questions that needed to be asked.

    What about Wakefield?
    You may have heard the name Andy Wakefield. His story has been told many times, including in his own (highly recommended) book “Callous Disregard.” In short, he was falsely accused of writing a paper that said MMR causes autism, causing vaccine hesitancy to skyrocket, shot rates to decline, and epidemics to explode. By honestly reporting what parents told him as a clinician22, he became the face of the government- and industry-scorned “anti-vaccine” movement.


    Source: Wikipedia, March 31, 2025.
    Wakefield was deemed public health enemy number 1! Is it true? Did one man really have the power to change vaccine rates around the globe with one simple publication? Why would he and “that paper” still be a threat today, almost 30 years later? It is certainly possible for one person to make massive change, but there’s more than meets the eye in the public execution of Wakefield’s character and career. He was at the center of a terrible storm where a growing number of doctors and devastated families were finding their own links between autism and vaccines, and governments wanted to destroy that mounting association with no questions asked. Wakefield became their scapegoat. Even before Wakefield came along, the public’s perception of this combination shot had already been shaken by the meningitis link.

    Most people who talk about “that Wakefield paper” haven’t read it, haven’t even seen its title.23 Here it is:



    In layman’s terms, this is a report on 12 children who sought treatment for intractable gut issues and developmental disorder without a clear cause. It’s a case series – not a clinical trial. MMR is relevant in the publication as part of the children’s medical history because the parent or physician of 8 of the 12 children linked the onset of behavioral problems with administration of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination.

    In the One Dream interview, Wakefield explains there was debate among the authors about whether to include the MMR connection. He asked, “Why not?” and insisted on reporting the facts as they were given by the parents, respecting their role as parents and caregivers. As revealed in the podcast, the authors debated whether to mention MMR at all, but Wakefield held strong on keeping it in, despite colleagues telling him he was risking his career. He trusted that the medical and scientific community would want honest feedback. So the authors proceeded to share the clinical history of their patients, but perhaps trying to hedge anticipated pushback on questioning the sacred cow that is vaccination, the 13 authors of the paper made it crystal clear in writing they were not saying MMR causes autism. They were not studying the MMR, but a potential link between gut health and autism spectrum disorders in specific children. But they committed the professional sin of noting that information given by parents and doctors needed “further investigation.”



    Here is the offending conclusion: “We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to the vaccine.” (emphasis added)

    The study had no controls because it was not an experiment or trial. It was a case study, which is a common type of publication used by practicing doctors to quickly bring attention to a pattern they see in their practice, with the intent that further investigation be done. A press conference was held after the publication and Wakefield did take the position that the MMR should be broken out into three shots because the safety of the combo hadn’t been studied.

    The fallout was swift and vicious. But notably, of the 13 authors, only three were investigated for misconduct. One of the investigated, Dr. Murch, was not sanctioned, as GMC noted he was “instrumental in the retraction of the interpretation that had been placed on The Lancet article by the media.” In other words, because Murch orchestrated 11 authors to publicly reject the “interpretation” of their writing, he was left alone. Dr. Walker-Smith initially lost his license, but he appealed and it was reinstated. Wakefield lost his license and abandoned his appeal.

    Wakefield was accused of having a financial bias in linking autism and the MMR. He had filed a patent that included a measles-only vaccine and other therapeutics involving the gut illnesses he was researching and attempting to treat in his patients. He says he filed to make sure he protected the financial interests of all involved in the research, even before the product was finalized, and indeed, the patent was never granted nor commercialized.24 Does that mean he had a financial interest that clouded his professional judgment? We can be cynical and say yes, it’s financially better for him if the combo is deemed dangerous. But also, even in a capitalist society, it is plausible that the tail isn’t wagging the dog. If Wakefield thought the triple-shot was dangerous, wouldn’t that be motivation to try to make a better product?

    He also received money from the U.K.’s Legal Services Commission as an expert to investigate the safety of the MMR.25 During his hearings with the General Medical Council, he defended his participation in the government-funded investigation with a statement: “If these diseases are found to be linked to the MMR vaccine, these children are the few unfortunate who have been sacrificed to protect the majority.” That was 1997. If the MMR has been dangerous since at least then, how many more children have been seriously injured?



    In a striking move, after Wakefield recommended separate shots instead of the combo MMR, the U.K. government took away the choice. In Wakefield’s own words: “In the fall of 1998, six months after The Lancet paper was published, choice in the United Kingdom was denied to parents when the government removed the license for the importation of the single measles vaccine. Let me state that again. At a time when demand for single vaccines was at its highest and parents were choosing to continue vaccinating against measles, mumps, and rubella with the single vaccines, choice was removed. When I asked a senior member of the United Kingdom’s equivalent of the CDC why, she said that allowing parents to choose single vaccines would destroy their established MMR program.

    “Nevertheless, removing the choice between the triple vaccine and single vaccines did not have the effect they intended – parents chose not to vaccinate against MMR rather than to use the triple vaccine, and MMR vaccination rates fell in the United Kingdom. The regulators chose to protect policy above children.”26 So was the drop in MMR rates a result of a publication or an unpopular policy?

    Here’s your TLDR summary: Did MMR rates fall after the “Wakefield paper” was released? Yes. Did MMR rates fall because Wakefield said MMR causes autism? No. There were other forces at work, including parental instinct and oppressive government policy. Did Wakefield do anything at all that a critical mind could question? Of course; he’s human. Did he deserve to become public health enemy number 1? No.

    We encourage you to read the whole sordid story in his own words in his book “Callous Disregard.”27



    What does the CDC know about the MMR-autism link?
    Americans have been told ad nauseum and with a religious-type fervor that vaccines don’t cause autism. What is that based on? According to current Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., three of the main studies the CDC relies upon by their own scientists were published in 2004, 2007, and 2010. Dr. William Thompson, who was a senior scientist at the immunization office, was author or coauthor on all three studies.28 Thompson spoke to scientific researcher and father Dr. Brian Hooker, in 2002-2004 when Hooker tried to advise on CDC vaccine safety studies for neurodevelopmental disorders, but was stopped when Hooker filed a petition for vaccine injury for his son with autism in the vaccine court. Thompson reached out again in 2013-2014 to help Hooker access data that had been hidden and examine the science. Thompson was able to deliver potentially classified information to Hooker in a legal way by educating him on the “citizen’s request.”

    Thompson revealed that the CDC manipulated autism-vaccine-link studies, and “omitted statistically significant information” that showed African American boys who got the MMR before the age of 3 were at a 340% higher risk of autism than those who delayed the shot. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) used studies that Thompson worked on to “slam the door on future autism and vaccine research.”29 Thompson was ready to “stop lying.” He regretted playing a part in a fraud that put autism research 10 years behind because the CDC was not transparent. (It’s now been 20 years.)

    Unbeknownst to Thompson, Hooker recorded four of their calls and made them public. Read “Vaccine Whistleblower” by Kevin Barry, Esq. for a full transcript. Thompson did not deny his statements, instead becoming a whistleblower, funneling copies of hidden CDC data to Congressman Bill Posey.

    Watch Congressman Posey bring the information to Congress and call for an investigation on July 29, 2015. He reads a quote from Thompson who describes a meeting with coworkers and superiors where researchers were ordered to put their research in a garbage can, but Thompson did not.

    The Orlando Sentinel reported that Posey had been quietly working with families for years, who believed their child’s autism was linked to vaccines.30 When Thompson approached him with documents to back up his claims, Posey took a stand on the floor of Congress, calling on colleagues to do their jobs to exercise oversight over the accused executive agency. Just like our current HHS Secretary Kennedy, he was called many names, but nobody answered the questions.

    Source: Bill Posey, Orlando Sentinel, 2015.
    As reported in “Vaccine Whistleblower,” “In the 2007 study, CDC scientists removed the low IQ individuals with autism or other neurological diagnosis from the pool before even beginning their study on Thimerosal exposure.”31 This was at the same time the U.S. Senate investigation led by senator and practicing physician Tom Coburn found “widespread corruption and mismanagement at the CDC’s vaccine programs.”32 A year later, an investigation by HHS found “97% of special government advisors on committee in the CDC vaccine program failed to disclose necessary information about conflicts of interest,” which led to criminal investigations.33

    According to the book, “Thompson now confesses that he and his fellow CDC researchers found a strong autism signal in children who received the MMR vaccine before their third birthday. Then, under orders from their bosses and in violation of the study protocols, the scientists eliminated this data from the final published study, in order to fool the public about vaccine safety.”34



    Source: Barry, Kevin. 2017. Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC.
    Conclusion
    The government’s decision to eliminate access to individual measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines in favor of the combined MMR shot was not made with families in mind. It exemplifies the worst kind of one-size-fits-all, government-backed medicine — where bureaucratic convenience and pharmaceutical interests trump parental concerns, scientific transparency, and individualized care.

    The stories of Dr. Andrew Wakefield and CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson illustrate the high cost of questioning this system. Wakefield’s call for further investigation — not a definitive claim — was met not with inquiry, but with professional ruin. Thompson, meanwhile, revealed that critical data suggesting a heightened risk of autism in certain populations following the MMR vaccine was concealed, not debated.

    These are not anomalies; they are symptoms of a larger culture that suppresses dissent, buries risk, and refuses to adapt — even as the childhood schedule grows more bloated and trust continues to erode.

    As Wakefield wrote:

    “When you are stonewalled or these answers are not to your satisfaction, trust your instinct. I say this as someone who has studied and engaged in the science and who has become aware of the limitations of our knowledge and understanding of vaccine safety issues. Maternal instinct, in contrast, has been a steady hand upon the tiller of evolution; we would not be here without it.”
    — Andy Wakefield, The Suppression of Science, Vaccine Epidemic, 2011

    This is not just a scientific issue — it’s a human rights issue. As Wakefield affirmed:

    “In the spirit of the Constitution, the people will have their say — vaccination choice is a human right.”
    — The Suppression of Science, Vaccine Epidemic, 2011

    The future of health freedom depends on our willingness to question authority, demand transparency, and defend the right of every family to make informed medical decisions — especially when government and industry refuse to do so.

    References:
    “Minutes, Meeting No. 1, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, May 25-26, 1964.” CDC Stacks, (1964). https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/77545. ↩︎
    Nachbagauer, Raffael, and Peter Palese. “Is a Universal Influenza Virus Vaccine Possible?” Annual Review of Medicine 71, (2020): 315-327. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31600454/. ↩︎
    HHS, NIH Launch Next-Generation Universal Vaccine Platform for Pandemic-Prone Viruses.” HHS Press Office, (2025). https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-n...-standard.html. ↩︎
    Oberman, Elayna. “Fewer Shots, More Protection: The Promise of Combination Vaccines.” PATH, (2025). https://www.path.org/our-impact/arti...%20this%20work. ↩︎
    Hausdorff, William P. PhD, et al. “Facilitating the Development of Urgently Required Combination Vaccines.” The Lancet 12, no. 6 (2024). https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...092-5/fulltext. ↩︎
    “Combination Vaccines Could Be the Future of Immunization Programs.” PATH, (2024). https://www.path.org/our-impact/arti...tion-programs/. ↩︎
    Oberman, Elayna. “Fewer Shots, More Protection: The Promise of Combination Vaccines.” PATH, (2025). https://www.path.org/our-impact/arti...%20this%20work. ↩︎
    “Terms of Reference for the Technical Advisory Group on Combination Vaccines.” World Health Organization, (2020). https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/defau...rsn=d0a92ec0_1. ↩︎
    Roos, Dave. “How a New Vaccine Was Developed in Record Time in the 1960s.” History, (2020). https://www.history.com/articles/mum...e-world-war-ii. ↩︎
    Sencer, David J. MD, H. Bruce Dull MD, and Alexander D. Langmuir MD. “Epidemiologic Basis for Eradication of Measles in 1967.” Public Health Reports 82, no. 3 (1967). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article...00027-0069.pdf. ↩︎
    Roos, Dave. “How a New Vaccine Was Developed in Record Time in the 1960s.” History, (2020). https://www.history.com/articles/mum...e-world-war-ii. ↩︎
    Anonymous. 2002. Turtles All the Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth. Edited by Zoey O’Toole, and Mary Holland J.D., p.358. https://www.amazon.com/Turtles-All-W.../dp/9655981045. ↩︎
    Edwards, Kathryn M. “Maternal Antibodies and Infant Immune Responses to Vaccines.” Vaccine 33, no. 47 (2015): 6469-6472. https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...tion%20%5B3%5D. ↩︎
    Edwards, Kathryn M. “Maternal Antibodies and Infant Immune Responses to Vaccines.” Vaccine 33, no. 47 (2015): 6469-6472. https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...tion%20%5B3%5D. ↩︎
    Iannelli, Vincent MD. “Are Vaccines Contaminated with Retroviruses?” Vaxopedia, (2018). https://vaxopedia.org/2018/12/29/are...-retroviruses/. ↩︎
    Khan, Arifa S. PhD. “Investigating Viruses in Cells Used to Make Vaccines; and Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Transmission of Viruses to Humans.” FDA Science & Research (Biologics), (2024). https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...d-transmission. Tsang, Shirley X. et al. “Evidence of Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup E and Endogenous Avian Virus in Measles and Mumps Vaccines Derived from Chicken Cells: Investigation of Transmission to Vaccine Recipients.” Journal of Virology, (1999). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article...f/jv005843.pdf. ↩︎
    Victoria, Joseph G. et al. “Viral Nucleic Acids in Live-Attenuated Vaccines: Detection of Minority Variants and an Adventitious Virus.” Journal of Virology 84, no. 12 (2010). https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.02690-09. ;
    Hussain, A I. et al. “Lack of Evidence of Endogenous Avian Leukosis Virus and Endogenous Avian Retrovirus Transmission to Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccine Recipients.” Emerging Infectious Diseases 7, no. 1 (1999): 66-72. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2631681/. ↩︎
    Miller, E. MFPHM, et al. “Risk of Aseptic Meningitis after Measles, Mumps,and Rubella Vaccine in UK Children.” The Lancet 341, no. 8851 (1993): p 979-982. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...069-X/fulltext. ↩︎
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...k-1551697.html ↩︎
    Omnibus Autism Proceeding.” U.S. Court of Federal Claims,. https://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/omnib...ism-proceeding. ↩︎
    “Celebrating 30 Years of Vaccines for Children (VFC).” David J. Sencer CDC Museum,. https://www.cdc.gov/museum/online/vfc.html. ↩︎
    “WAKEFIELD EPISODE TITLE.” One Dream Podcast with Dr.Nick and Leah Wilson. Video, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas...n/id1443439682. ↩︎
    Wakefield, A J. et al. “Ileal-lymphoid-nodular Hyperplasia, Non-specific Colitis, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder in Children.” The Lancet 351, (1998): p.637-641. https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journ...97)11096-0.pdf. ↩︎
    “Day 31 GMC Fitness to Practice Hearing for Andrew Wakefield.” Wakefield GMC Transcripts, (2012). https://wakefieldgmctranscripts.blog...ce=chatgpt.com. ↩︎
    Dyer, Owen. “Wakefield Tells GMC He Was Motivated by Concern for Autistic Children.” British Medical Journal 336, no. 7647 (2008): 738. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article...ce=chatgpt.com. ↩︎
    Habakus, Louise K., Mary Holland M.A., J.D, and Kim M. Rosenberg J.D. 2012. Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed, Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health, and Our Children. Skyhorse. p. 232. https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Epide.../dp/1620872129., ↩︎
    Wakefield, Andrew J. 2017. Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines — The Truth Behind a Tragedy. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disre.../dp/1510729666. ↩︎
    Wakefield, Andrew J. 2017. Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines — The Truth Behind a Tragedy. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disre.../dp/1510729666. ↩︎
    Barry, Kevin. 2017. Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whist.../dp/1510727302, page xxi. ↩︎
    Powers, Scott. “Rep Posey at Center of Vaccine-Autism Fight.” Orlando Sentinal https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2015...-autism-fight/. ↩︎
    Barry, Kevin. 2017. Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whist.../dp/1510727302, page xv. ↩︎
    Barry, Kevin. 2017. Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whist.../dp/1510727302, page xvii.; Coburn, Tom M.D. . “CDC Off Center.” The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, (2007). https://coburn.library.okstate.edu/c...off_center.pdf. ↩︎
    Barry, Kevin. 2017. Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whist.../dp/1510727302, page xvii. ↩︎
    Barry, Kevin. 2017. Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Skyhorse. https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Whist.../dp/1510727302, page xiv, foreword by Robert F, Kennedy Jr. ↩︎ "
    Last edited by onawah; 20th May 2025 at 21:47.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th May 2025), Ewan (21st May 2025), Harmony (21st May 2025), meat suit (22nd May 2025), mountain_jim (22nd May 2025), Vangelo (21st May 2025), Yoda (20th May 2025)

  35. Link to Post #2158
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Breaking: Senate Report Exposes How Federal Health Officials ‘Downplayed’ COVID Vaccine Risks, Failed to Warn Public
    by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
    May 21, 2025
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250521

    "The report, issued today by the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, reveals previously redacted information from government records recently obtained by subpoena and by earlier requests under the Freedom of Information Act. The committee will hold a hearing later today.

    Public health officials under the Biden administration failed to warn the public of the myocarditis risk associated with COVID-19 vaccines and actively downplayed that risk, according to a U.S. Senate report released today.

    The report, issued by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, reveals previously redacted information from government records recently obtained by subpoena and by earlier requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

    The records show how U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) officials under Biden avoided issuing a formal warning to the American public despite a safety signal that the COVID-19 vaccines could cause myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in young men.

    Later today, the subcommittee will hold a hearing entitled, “The Corruption of Science and Federal Health Agencies: How Health Officials Downplayed and Hid Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccines.”

    Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), the subcommittee chair, wrote in the report’s executive summary that the records reveal three facts:
    U.S. health officials knew about the risks of myocarditis;
    Those officials downplayed the health concern; and
    U.S. health agencies delayed informing the public about the risk of the adverse event.
    In addition to the report, Johnson today also released the more than 2,400 pages of documents obtained by his subpoena to HHS.

    “Sadly, this report confirms what we have long suspected and proven,” said Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland. “It underscores the aberrant science and extreme cover-ups that were endemic during the COVID era.”

    Holland cited a peer-reviewed study published in October 2022, by CHD Senior Research Scientist Karl Jablonowski and CHD Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker, showing that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knew there was a safety “signal” for myocarditis more than three months before warning the public.

    The study documented that as early as Feb. 19, 2021, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), co-managed by the CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), showed a strong, statistically significant vaccine adverse event “signal” for myocarditis in males 8-21 years of age. Yet the CDC waited until late May 2021 to alert the public.

    According to the report released today, the CDC first warned the public on May 28, 2021, by posting an online “clinical considerations” note about myocarditis risk for COVID-19 vaccines.

    The report also revealed that the CDC initially considered issuing a more formal public alert that would have been sent to healthcare practitioners nationwide via its Health Action Network. However, agency officials decided against it.

    According to the CDC, its Health Alert Network is the agency’s “primary method of sharing cleared information about urgent public health incidents with public information officers; federal, state, territorial, tribal, and local public health practitioners; clinicians; and public health laboratories.”

    Holland said it will take “great skill and effort” to restore the public’s trust in its public health agencies and officials after this “extreme irresponsibility toward the American public.”

    Commenting on the new report, Hooker said, “It is so encouraging that Sen. Johnson is bringing this entire cover-up regarding COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis to light.”

    He added, “The corrupt CDC and FDA officials who stonewalled the truth need to be held to account for the huge increases in cardiac issues seen, especially among young adult males.”

    Report reveals records that ‘should have been provided years ago’

    The subcommittee called the new report an “interim” report because the HHS is still in the process of handing over documents subpoenaed by Johnson.

    In late January, Johnson subpoenaed HHS for COVID vaccine safety records after writing more than 70 congressional oversight letters to HHS officials and its health agencies during the Biden administration.

    In the letters, Johnson requested information on COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and related communications. Biden HHS officials “either completely ignored or inadequately addressed” the requests, according to the report.

    “Now,” the report states, “under a new administration and a new HHS secretary, HHS is beginning to produce records, pursuant to the chairman’s subpoena, that should have been provided years ago, without redactions, to Congress and the public.”

    A spokesperson for the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations told reporters that the report builds on the work of many journalists and researchers who tried to make data about the COVID-19 vaccine’s cardiac risks public.

    The spokesperson said:
    “Some of the people we want to credit are Brenda Baletti, Ed Berkovich, Brian Hooker, Amy Kelly, Zachary Stieber, Naomi Wolf, and many others who worked persistently to expose the truth about the association of myocarditis with the COVID-19 vaccines. We are grateful for their efforts.”

    CDC, FDA didn’t update V-safe program to track cardiac issues

    Although journalists and scientists had previously reported some of the material covered in the new report, the report reveals some new data.

    For instance, the report revealed documentation showing that top U.S. public health officials at HHS, CDC, FDA, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in April 2021 were warned that V-safe, another safety survelliance system, could miss “possible cases of cardiac adverse events” because it failed to include cardiac symptoms in its pre-programmed list of vaccine side effects for individuals to check off.

    CDC and FDA officials opted not to update the V-safe program to include cardiac-related symptoms, the report said.

    According to the report, CDC and FDA officials also failed to “take further steps to account for cases of underreporting in VAERS.”

    Although reports in VAERS require verification before they can be confirmed as vaccine-related injuries or deaths, the system has historically been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events."

    Peter Marks appeared still ignorant of VAERS safety signal in May 2021
    Additionally, the report revealed drafted notes for a May 24, 2021, “confidential” meeting of the CDC’s vaccine safety technical workgroup for the COVID-19 vaccine, which acknowledged a VAERS safety signal for myopericarditis in young people.

    The notes contained the question, “Is VAERS signaling for myopericarditis?” and the answer, “For the age groups 16-17 years and 18-23 years, yes.”

    The report also reveals that three days later, Dr. Peter Marks expressed concern about alerting the public to the risk of myocarditis from COVID-19 vaccines. On May 27, 2021, Marks, then-director of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, emailed Dr. Rochelle Walensky, then-director of the CDC, and copied Dr. Janet Woodcock, a former FDA official.

    In the email, Marks appeared unaware or ignorant of the VAERS signal mentioned in the May 24, 2021, CDC meeting notes. He wrote, “I need to ask for your patience with me. We still have concerns here if myocarditis and pericarditis have not actually signaled.”

    The report also makes public previously redacted Biden White House talking points used on May 25, 2021 — just three days before the CDC finally posted its “clinical considerations” about myocarditis.

    The talking points, which were emailed to Walensky, then-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, and then-NIH Director Francis Collins, made misleading claims about the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines and downplayed the risk of myocarditis.

    The fact that the Biden administration previously redacted the 17 pages of talking points in response to a FOIA request reveals the “absurdity” of the administration’s attempt to hide information from the public, the report said.

    According to the report:
    “The 17-page document contains all the talking points the public heard ad nauseam from public health officials throughout the spring and summer of 2021 and into 2022. There is nothing new revealed in the unredacted document that needed to be hidden, which raises the question: why did the Biden administration obstruct the Subcommittee’s efforts to obtain it?

    “Perhaps they were embarrassed by how misleading the talking points are in retrospect.” "

    Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa.

    Related articles in The Defender
    Mounting Evidence Suggests CDC Hid Data on COVID Vaccines and Myocarditis
    ‘Criminal Neglect’: CDC Knew COVID Vaccine Could Cause Myocarditis in Young Males Months Before Telling the Public
    FDA to Limit Approvals of New COVID Vaccines to Elderly, High-Risk Groups — But Hundreds of Millions Still Eligible for the Shots
    CDC Stonewalls Requests for COVID Vaccine Safety Monitoring Documents
    Study of 1.7 Million Kids and Teens Who Got Pfizer COVID Vaccine Found Myopericarditis Only in Vaxed
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (22nd May 2025), ClearWater (22nd May 2025), Harmony (22nd May 2025), mountain_jim (22nd May 2025)

  37. Link to Post #2159
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, RIPS mRNA Vaccines -So Why Won’t He Pull Them?!?
    The Jimmy Dore Show
    1.53M subscribers
    5/21/25

    (Tactics on the various political fronts are getting very "cagey". Maybe someday it will all be known as to who was threatening whom and with what... ...and why those who should have gone to prison never even got charged. )

    Last edited by onawah; 22nd May 2025 at 14:53.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (22nd May 2025), ClearWater (22nd May 2025), Harmony (22nd May 2025), mountain_jim (22nd May 2025)

  39. Link to Post #2160
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    26,310
    Thanks
    54,902
    Thanked 142,084 times in 24,712 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Articles on review today from Childen's Health Defense
    5/21/25
    http://support.childrenshealthdefens...38DB85E6D1B5C1

    ( The cracks are really beginning to show, but the vaccine makers and their medical shills are not going down without a fight... )

    Moderna Pulls Application for FDA Approval of Flu-COVID Shot After FDA Calls for New Clinical Trials
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250521

    MedPage Today Admits Mumps Vaccine Doesn’t Work, Shrugs Off RFK Jr.’s Concerns by Blaming His Law Career
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250521

    Senate Report Exposes How Federal Health Officials ‘Downplayed’ COVID Vaccine Risks, Failed to Warn Public
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250521

    Dear FDA Vaccine Advisers: It’s Time to Right a Terrible Wrong
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250521

    NHS ‘Overwhelmed’ by Soaring Autism as Number of Patients Jump by a Quarter – More Than 200,000 Britons Seeking Specialist Help + More
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...tm_id=20250521
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (22nd May 2025), ClearWater (22nd May 2025), Harmony (22nd May 2025), mountain_jim (22nd May 2025)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 108 of 117 FirstFirst 1 8 58 98 108 117 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts