Amazing Polly's exposure of The Wellness Company

[grapevine]

I don't have anything to add except that the AP video left me feeling irritated that nothing we see or hear is bonafide, all is suspect, and that if we just look hard enough we will find something, which can then throw doubt on everything and everybody concerned.

During the Covid travesty I remember that Robert Malone and Peter McCullough were (just about) the only dissenting voices when we were being fed total crap about vaccines, and gradually other "experts" came around to where we are today. And, as someone who took one Astra Zeneca vaccine with a horrible reaction, I thank God they did, as my own doctor told me that was OK and to have another, so it was great to have that Expert opinion to resist any more

There's no doubt that The Wellness Company is a large and growing company, with huge marketing potential and presence, and the Blackwater connection is certainly questionable, but imo AP's reporting buys into our paranoia. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if all/most companies can be traced back through their investors to either Black Rock or Vanguard - or both.

[Jim_Duyer]

Bill Ryan - thanks for opening my eyes about these cretins who attack and defame those good Doctors who, during stressful times, helped the general population as much as they could.

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
...

Posted by ulli (here)
I’ve always trusted Clif High and Alexandra Bruce a lot more than AP. Just a feeling about her energy when she speaks.
So here is ForbiddenKnowledgeTV digging into her background.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/not...mall-business/

• How Amazing or Trustworthy is Polly aka Sherri Nelson?

• source

• Full Disclosure: Polly’s Government Psyop?

• Sherri Nelson (Amazing Polly) "Dissociative Identity Disorder" (DID)?

• source

No idea what to make of it all

Unless you are a "MASTER of spreading very clever insinuations & conjecture" not expecting that what you do to others can equally be done to you ... rightfully or not ... does not matter >>> because the super high standards you demand for others can easily be mirrored back ... Am more interested in her possible dodging techniques & evasiveness of what the LEGIT concerns are of many colleague researchers out there because she uses the same psychoanalyzes rhetoric too

I think she genuinely wants to expose stuff, BUT I sense she has enough blind spots she can not see for herself yet ... We must not make the same mistake by jumping to conclusions for or against ... first making a list of legit questions & concerns, then awaiting her effort to "debunk" or "correct" them ... or stay silent claiming/assuming "she is above everybody" ... I do not know ... We will see soon enough.

She is certainly "one of a kind", and not many are that thorough like her. I give her that!

The way she exposes topics like WEF/Agenda2030/Great Reset is truly amazing, that will never change!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[chrifri]

Miller
Agreed, that probably, if we just look hard enough we will find something and I certainly agree as well with your mentioning WC’s questionable connections and you are probably correct with Black Rock or Vanguard being main investors in WC or companies integrated in this group.

Regarding Robert Malone and Peter McCullough, I am of course very happy that these two helped you to take the correct decision by not accepting another shot and just this fact alone, certainly gives them a lot of credit but nevertheless, I cannot agree with the idea of both of them “being (just about) the only dissenting voices” ........
It might not be your intention but to me this seems to basically elevating these two to the top of those having fought for our health and freedom and this, in my humble opinion, is an affront to those who really were fighting hard from the very beginning.
Just to mention a few. Dr. Gold and Frontline Doctors, Dr. Sucharit Bakhti, Dr. Wolfgan Wodarg, Dr. Lee Merritt and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and their group and others. People that were in, basically from the very first minute. Other real fighters as for example Steve Kirsch, Dr. David Martin who gradually came around (and if I am not wrong McCullough belongs to this group) certainly merit being mentioned as well.
However, Dr. Robert Malone who entered into the scene basically when Brad Weinstein did a video with him and Steve Kirsch, should not be on that list. In that Weinstein video, it was Steve Kirsch who clearly was opposing the shot showing/mentioning real and true facts. Malone, during the whole video, was trying to negate/play down/trivialize the risks of the shot and of course his responsibility. Why down playing his responsibility? Because he apparently was one if not “the” inventor of the mRNA technology for this shot.

Malone, like Geert Vanden Bosche and others, entered into the scene rather by accident. Both were pro shot before and worked, in the relative past, for entities that pushed the shot(s). Both, in my opinion, got into the scene with the intention to down play the risks, but were overwhelmed, as some of the few real fighters welcomed them in their ranks, misunderstanding Malones and Vanden Bosches real intentions.

Back to the topic:

To AP vs WC: If the information in AP’s video is correct? I don’t know. If the WC company is to be trusted or not? I don’t know.
In any case, I agree with Norman, post 18 and Wegge, post 20

[norman]

LOOK WHO IS PUSHING BIRD FLU FEAR PORN
Dr. Jane Ruby

Coffee Chat 4/5/24: Pay close attention to who jumps into the chorus to push the H5N1 fear porn...it's some of your anti covid favorites...have they flipped?
Dr. Jane Ruby is an American scientist, medical professional, and commentator. You can follow her Substack at https://substack.com/@drjaneruby

https://rumble.com/v4np5v0-look-who-...fear-porn.html


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v4l3y8x/?pub=4

[Pam]

There seems to be a huge vulnerability among humans that most are unable to escape. I am not saying it applies to anyone mentioned in this thread, but I have observed it so many times it makes my head spin. Someone starts a YouTube channel or a social media account(s), because they have something pertinent to say, maybe even something life saving or paradigm changing. They become popular and sometimes for quite awhile their information is needed and wanted. Then, things change, or they resolve, or many people take up the same cause and this creates a sort of dilemma for some.

They have come to rely on the income and I think in many cases, more importantly, they become addicted to their level of fame, which is relative. They may no longer have anything groundbreaking to say, or certainly not on a daily basis but the need to maintain relevance and to continue the income is a huge incentive to stay pertinent. This is the time where integrity can come into the picture. Do they possibly cut back on how much they are doing on line or do the sometimes compromise what they are doing to stay pertinent. This might not even be a conscious thing.

I have seen a number of people I once deeply admired become nothing more than shills. They desire to maintain their importance so deeply that they compromise at varying levels. David Wilcox is an extreme example. Someone that one had some interesting information who was willing to totally sell out to keep his well paying gig going.

I am really not well informed enough to have any definitive opinions on "The Wellness Company", but they are at least a doorway out of the total regime of medicine. They don't require total solutions, or address the total issues and lean heavily on allopathic medicine but they are a step away from "doctors word as god" and do anything the authorities tell you.They promote some degree of taking personal responsibility for your own health. They also challenge the premise that because someone tells you something is "safe and effective" and they are an "expert or authority" figure, we don't have to go along with it unquestioningly.

I rarely watch him, but I watched a JP Sears comedian skit where he was pushing "the Wellness Company". So I bet they are making money and eventually they will probably be bought out. I remember when "Garden of Life" vitamins that I thought were great, was bought out by Nestles, a horribly corrupt corporation. That is what happens here. My premise is that everything eventually will become weaponized or inverted. I will believe that until I see evidence the tells me I am wrong, or this is no longer true. Maybe a jaded viewpoint and maybe I have created my own timeline where I made that true, I have no idea.I am not denying goodness or great small businesses ,yet I know in the US that every effort is made to buy them out or break them in one way or another.

At this point, I think that anything that is any sort of revelation of the exploitation and genocide and making infants, even fetuses ill or die and continuing the process throughout our lives so a handful can have control, anything that cracks that open a bit is good, until it becomes so corrupted it isn't any more.

That is the pathetic paradigm we live in at this time. It is NOT self sustaining and it will destroy itself. This sort of "Service to Self" creates it's own demise, it chokes itself off. It so very much reminds me of the self serving corrupted wizard Saruman in Lord of the Rings and what he made of the land he abided in, Isengard. He turned a beautiful place into a hellish ultimately unlivable place with creatures that were modified from their original lovely forms to his hideous monstrosities. The Lord of the Rings really is quite prophetic in so many ways. It was only recently that I saw this so clearly.

So the whole thing is unsustainable, but I applaud anyone that makes an attempt to fix things...

I did not intend to make this into a long winded philosophical discussion, but in a way that is what it is. I have huge respect for Dr. McCullough. The guy has moxy and integrity and shows us all what human potential can be, he has elements of masculinity that I savor. I doubt he cares about getting richer, he was probably doing quite well for himself. I think he is a tireless advocate for what he sees as right. For all he knew he could be sitting in prison for his efforts.

Why they don't see the bigger picture, I don't know, they seemed befuddled that the government doesn't do the right thing. Maybe they just don't go there, they would lose the audience. Well enough from me. Love, Pam

[norman]

I'm not promoting anything on this general topic other than the addition of more information and views.

I'm convinced there is something tilted going on but I can't honestly say I've got it figured out. I have suspicions about the rise of several popular 'influencers' but that's only what keeps me interested enough to revive this thread with a recent 'The Higherside Chats' episode that discusses the topic of the recent alt media landscape since the collapse of the MSM, post 2017.

Some strands of my suspicions go back a very long way. I don't even think of Art Bell in the way I used to, since I found out he was running a hippy/anti war music 'pirate' radio station out of an air force base during the Laurel Canyon haydays.


THC - 7Sees - Technocracy Take Over, Shady Sponsors of Podcasting, & The Web Of Lies
1 hour 23 minutes - Posted Jun 7, 2025


About Today’s Guest: 7Sees is an independent researcher, largely focused on mapping out connections few realize are there. He is the host of “This Week on the Web” on Ickonic, as well as “LIES & TIES” weekly livestreams on his youtube channel where he dives deep into technocracy, secret societies, and occult symbolism to expose globalist agendas.

Guest Links:
7Sees on Twitter: https://x.com/7SEES_
7Sees on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@7SEESLIVE
7Sees on Substack: https://substack.com/@7sees



adding the video version:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=liPjYAqr1i0