France's First Lady is Actually a Man?!

[onawah]

Candace Owens a threat to world peace?
Trump Calls Candace Owens And Asks Her To Stop Exposing Brigitte Macron

Posted by Mike (here)
Yep, you read that right. Some truly weird Twilight Zone stuff here. But it gets even weirder...

This is one of those very bizarre threads that could have been posted in any number of forums or sub forums here: the human condition, conspiracy research, the unexplained, high strangeness, or even the lighter side.

The gist of it is this (and this is so surreal I can hardly believe I'm typing it here): President Trump put in a personal phonecall to Candace Owens and asked her - in the name of world peace - to stop exposing Brigitte Macron on her podcast.

Don't believe me? Well, have a listen for yourself. 56 mins:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1103XwJ2N9c

[Flash]

Wether she groomed him or not (everything is possible), the push on his face could really be playful, mostly when you know French behavior in general where physical manifestation of playfull is much more frequent than in the anglo saxon world.

A cultural difference - but I won’t ask American cheap podcasters to understand this. Much more interesting to have high number of clics. Which for me delineate good source of information from mediocre ones.

Good sources look at all aspects of an event. Or non event like this push from madame Macron.

[Mike]

Posted by Flash (here)
Wether she groomed him or not (everything is possible), the push on his face could really be playful, mostly when you know French behavior in general where physical manifestation of playfull is much more frequent than in the anglo saxon world.

A cultural difference - but I won’t ask American cheap podcasters to understand this. Much more interesting to have high number of clics. Which for me delineate good source of information from mediocre ones.

Good sources look at all aspects of an event. Or non event like this push from madame Macron.

Well they met when he was 14 and she was 39. So she groomed him!

The facial push is merely a side dish. The reality is that a 39 yr old dude presenting as a woman seduced a 14 year old boy...and this is a romance that's celebrated in France for it's charming whimsicality or something. Owens has exposed how demented it all really is. The evidence she presents is undeniable.

[Flash]

Posted by Mike (here)

Posted by Flash (here)
Wether she groomed him or not (everything is possible), the push on his face could really be playful, mostly when you know French behavior in general where physical manifestation of playfull is much more frequent than in the anglo saxon world.

A cultural difference - but I won’t ask American cheap podcasters to understand this. Much more interesting to have high number of clics. Which for me delineate good source of information from mediocre ones.

Good sources look at all aspects of an event. Or non event like this push from madame Macron.

Well they met when he was 14 and she was 39. So she groomed him!

The facial push is merely a side dish. The reality is that a 39 yr old dude presenting as a woman seduced a 14 year old boy...and this is a romance that's celebrated in France for it's charming whimsicality or something. Owens has exposed how demented it all really is. The evidence she presents is undeniable.

How do you know is is reality that she is a dude - grooming ok -for the rest, did you sleep with her?

Only vitriol, based on what Candace is exceptional at, presenting ‘research’ which isn’t under a vitriol umbrella. . Many clics please so that I become rich -her moto.


Not at your level Mike, so why do you succomb to this? Vitriol and hatred and separation, does not make great beings once on the other side of life.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Flash (here)
How do you know is is reality that she is a dude - grooming ok -for the rest, did you sleep with her?

He followed the crumbs and reviewed the evidence, which Candace Owens revealed in a series of investigative videos, all of them posted earlier in this thread.

Did you watch them, Flash? I suspect not. Before declaring your verdict, I suggest you first study the clues.

Episode 1 is here:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xIbUXQ5c-oQ

[Delight]

Hummmmm.....

[Kryztian]

Posted by Flash (here)

How do you know is is reality that she is a dude - grooming ok -for the rest, did you sleep with her?

Unlike the "Michelle Obama is a man" conspiracy, which is based on one strange comment by Joan Rivers, there really is a well-presented evidence-based case here.

Candace Owens thinks the case that Brigitte Macron is originally Jean-Michel Trogneux, is a 100% certainty and would be willing to stake her career on the matter. I don't completely agree - she may be right, or all the evidence may point to something else - the total lack of evidence about the life of young Brigitte should raise some eyebrows however.

On the one hand, I don't really think it should matter what the Macron's do in their bedroom (as long it is mutually consensual) or care about what anatomical features are actually located under Brigitte Macron's pants. If Emmanuel Macron is Gynandromorphophilic, (attracted to individuals with a combination of male and female physical characteristics, which can include trans women with penises) that really should not affect his job. In my opinion, he is a lousy Prime Minister and that has nothing to do with his predilections, and to focus on that would be a ludicrous distraction from what his real failures are.

On the other hand, if you are a politician and are constantly under public scrutiny, harboring secrets that you don't want made public can completely compromise your job, and just might be what could be happening here. Per Candace Owens, Macron is holding up a peace deal with Ukraine until Trump finds a way to silence Owens. If that is the case, than people are more people dying unnecessarily there because of Macron - which makes him a war criminal and this would be absolutely treasonous.

I think your instincts are completely right to doubt this narrative about the Macrons after so many people have spread the ridiculous "Mike" story about Obama based on almost no information other than a brief remark by a somewhat deranged Joan Rivers. Juvenile behavior in the conspiracy world does a lot of damage to the truth.

But the proof here is in the evidence and the rational analysis. There is something very wrong about Brigitte Macron's story about her early life and some answers should be forthcoming. If people can ask the questions in a mature and intelligent way (which isn't always done by some of the barbarians on this forum ) than we should be able to demand some intelligent answers. But if Macron's PR department (that is, just about the entire mainstream media) can spin this as some case of right wing irrational mob behavior (which it just might be with the Michelle Obama story) than they will be able to deflect attention on it.

[onawah]

The amount of evidence proving Big Mike is a man is just as substantial, if not more so, as the case proving Brigitte is a man, though not as damning since there was no pedophilia involved that we know of (at least, not between Obama and Mike, though there have been reports of very young men at the White House under suspicious circumstances).
That evidence has been posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...ght=the+Obamas

Posted by Kryztian (here)
Unlike the "Michelle Obama is a man" conspiracy, which is based on one strange comment by Joan Rivers, there really is a well-presented evidence-based case here.

[Kryztian]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

Posted by Flash (here)
How do you know is is reality that she is a dude - grooming ok -for the rest, did you sleep with her?

He followed the crumbs and reviewed the evidence, which Candace Owens revealed in a series of investigative videos, all of them posted earlier in this thread.

Did you watch them, Flash? I suspect not. Before declaring your verdict, I suggest you first study the clues.

Episode 1 is here:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xIbUXQ5c-oQ

This is a worthwhile video, BUT, it doesn't really prove anything about Brigitte's biological sex, or the coverup. It mostly established some very interesting connections that the Macron's have. It sets the stage by describing the cast of characters in the media, fashion industry, and cosmetic surgery field that the Macron's have.

Here's the one I recommend to get started on.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mXGUHYVUZZk

[Kryztian]

French President Emmanuel Macron sues right-wing podcaster Candace Owens
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...8904911Melissa Quinn
Wed, July 23, 2025 at 5:11 PM EDT
4 min read

Washington — French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron filed a defamation lawsuit against right-wing podcast host Candace Owens on Wednesday in response to claims she peddled that France's first lady was born a man.

The 22-count complaint was filed in Delaware Superior Court and seeks an unspecified amount of damages from Owens, who broadcast an eight-part series spreading a host of allegations about the Macrons, including that Brigitte Macron was born a man, stole another person's identity and transitioned to a woman.

Article continues here: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...8904911Melissa

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I can imagine that no one in the world is happier about this than Candace Owens herself. What an entertaining s***show this is going to be!

[Kryztian]

Apparently, the Macrons leaked the legal documents to the Financial Times and published them on the web before they served Candace Owens with paperwork - in other words, they are more interested in using the suit for publicity than in wining an actual lawsuit. They must have needed this publicity, since they lost their last lawsuit against two other individuals they accused of defamation.

And even the Financial Times doesn't think the Macron's have a leg to stand on:

https://www.ft.com/content/d9bf7d2b-...6-8629e3046f24
The suit is a rare case of a serving world leader personally suing an online influencer over their content, though it comes days after Donald Trump sued The Wall Street Journal and its parent companies over a report of a letter that the US president allegedly wrote to Jeffrey Epstein.
The Macrons face a high legal bar, since US defamation laws require public figures to show “actual malice”, meaning that the person knew the information was false or had a reckless disregard for the truth. The Macrons are seeking a jury trial and punitive damages.

I haven't finished listening to this yet, but here is Candace Owens in her own words on the lawsuit (52 minutes).

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PKKLk57tcLs